This invention relates to a method of recovering metals from low grade ores and residues. More particularly, the invention is concerned with increasing the economic viability of recovering base or other metals by means of cyanide leaching of low grade ores and residues by providing a method for the effective recovery of cyanide, contained in a lixiviant to the leach process, which allows for the recovered cyanide to be recycled.
Without being restrictive “low grade ores”, as used herein, includes oxide and sulphide ores, especially ores containing high acid-consuming gangue materials such as calcite, dolomite, calcium, magnesium, aluminium, manganese and iron.
The recovery of base metals such as copper, nickel, cobalt and zinc from low grade ores by means of sulphuric acid leaching is often considered uneconomical, at least for the following reasons:
Although the cyanidation of low grade ores can be very effective in recovering base metals and precious metals, the high levels of free cyanide that are required to ensure effective leaching have a detrimental effect on the economic viability of the process.
Several methods for recovering cyanide, following a cyanidation process, have been developed so that the recovered cyanide can be recycled in order to make the cyanidation process more economical. One method, referred to as the SART process, used for recovering gold from copper-gold ores, has shown promise.
A basic flow sheet of the SART process is shown in
The SART process is primarily used for gold recovery. To the applicant's knowledge the SART process has not been considered for the treatment of low grade base metal ores or residues, for the quantity of base metal which would be recovered would not normally justify the high cost of the reagents.
An object of the present invention is to provide a method which, at least partially, addresses the problem associated with these high costs.
The invention provides a method for the recovery of at least one metal from a low grade ore or residue, wherein the method includes the following steps:
The cyanide leaching step a) is conducted at a pH which preferably is between 10 and 11.
The removal of the leached or barren solids from the pregnant leach solution in step b) may be effected by means of counter-current decantation, filtration or the like.
In order to optimise the recovery of the metal sulphide and the hydrogen cyanide, the leached or barren solids may be subjected to a washing step. A resulting solution is then separated into a wash water which is recycled to the upgraded pregnant leach solution, and a washed leach residue which may then be subjected to a cyanide destruction step.
The nano-filtration in step d) may be carried out using any suitable membrane having an appropriate pore size to prevent the metal cyanide concentrate from permeating the membrane.
The permeate produced in step d) may be recycled to the cyanide leaching step a).
In the acidification of the metal cyanide concentrate (in step e)) the pH of the concentrate may be lowered to a value of between 2 and 6. This may be done by the addition of sulphuric acid. The lowering of the pH causes the metal cyanide concentrate to dissociate and form a solution which contains metal-sulphate and hydrogen cyanide.
In the subsequent sulphidisation process, which is preferably effected by adding sulphide in the form of hydrogen sulphide or sodium sulphide, the metal sulphate in the solution is sulphidised to form the stream which contains metal sulphide.
The permeate which is produced in step d) is, in a variation of the invention, subjected to a reverse osmosis process to form a high quality water stream and a NaCN concentrate which is recycled to the cyanide leaching step a).
The metal may be extracted from the metal sulphide by any suitable means known in the art. The metal recovered may be base metal, such as copper, nickel, cobalt or zinc, or precious metal, such as gold or silver.
The invention is further described by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In a first step 14 the ores and residues 12 are subjected to cyanide leaching at an alkaline pH by the addition of cyanide 16. Preferably the pH is between 10 and 11 pH values which are regarded as optimal. The outcome of the cyanide leaching step is a pregnant leach solution 18 which contains at least one metal cyanide i.e. a cyanide of a target metal which may be any one of the aforementioned metals.
The pregnant leach solution 18 is subjected to a solid/liquid separation process 20 which may be effected by means of counter-current decantation, filtration or the like. The process 20 removes barren or leached solids 22 from the solution and produces an upgraded pregnant leach solution 24 which contains the metal cyanide.
To optimise the recovery of the base metal and the free cyanide the solids 22 are washed in a step 26 and a resulting solution is filtered to produce a wash water 28 and washed solids 30.
The washed solids are subjected to a cyanide destruction step 32 to produce a detoxified product 34 which is sent to a slimes dam 36.
The wash water 28 which may contain some of the metal cyanide, and the upgraded pregnant leach solution 24 are subjected to an ultrafiltration or clarification step 38 which produces a clarified liquor 40 which contains the metal cyanide. This is followed by a nano-filtration step 44 during which the metal cyanide is removed from the clarified liquor 40. The nano-filtration step 44 is carried out using an appropriate membrane which has a chosen pore size which allows a permeate 46 of water and sodium cyanide (NaCN) to pass through the membrane. The permeate is then recycled to the step 12.
The pore size of the membrane prevents the metal cyanide from permeating the membrane. The metal cyanide which is thereby concentrated constitutes the retentate 48.
In an acidification step 50 sulphuric acid 52 is added to the retentate 48 to lower the pH of the retentate to a value of between 2 and 6. Once the pH is sufficiently low, the metal cyanide complex dissociates and forms a solution 54 which contains a metal sulphate complex and dissolved hydrogen cyanide.
In a subsequent sulphidisation step 56 hydrogen sulphide 58 (or sodium sulphide in a salt form) is added to the solution 54 to produce a solution 60 which contains a metal sulphide complex 62. This complex 62, which for example may be a copper, gold or silver sulphide product, is recovered from the solution 60 by means of a solid/liquid separation step 64. The metal content may be recovered from the complex using any suitable technique.
The pH of a liquid 66 produced by the step 64 is adjusted in a step 68, for example by the addition of lime 70 (CaO), to a value of between 10 and 11, ie. to the alkaline operating range of the cyanide leaching step 14. Hydrogen cyanide 74 emerging from the step 68 is recycled to the cyanide leaching step 14.
The invention provides a number of significant benefits which include the following:
The aforementioned benefits produce a substantial saving in operating and capital costs. Table 2 shows the savings in operating expenditure (OPEX) produced by the process according to
In the process 10A the permeate 46 emerging from the nano-filtration step 44 is subjected to a reverse osmosis step 80. This produces a sodium cyanide concentrate 82 and high quality water 84. The concentrate 82 is recycled to the step 14. The modification embodied in the process 10A means that the production of waste water of an unacceptable quality is reduced.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014/04452 | Jun 2014 | ZA | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/ZA2015/000045 | 6/18/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/196220 | 12/23/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3681055 | Little | Aug 1972 | A |
5961833 | Green et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6156186 | Mueller | Dec 2000 | A |
6355175 | Green | Mar 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0162993 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/ZA2015/000045, dated Apr. 20, 2016. |
M. Stewart et al: “SART for copper control in cyanide heap leaching”, Dec. 1, 2012 (Dec. 1, 2012), pp. 1037-1043. XP055263836, Retrieved from the Internet:URL:http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/jsaimm/v112n2/11. pdf [retrieved on Apr. 8, 2016] the whole document. |
Written Opinion, PCT/ZA2015/000045, dated Apr. 20, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170152583 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |