Patent Grant
11473500
The invention is in the field of engines for flight vehicles such as airplanes, missiles, projectiles or access-to-space systems.
Supersonic and hypersonic air-breathing engines, such as dual-mode ramjets/scramjets, include isolators. The isolator is typically a constant-area or slightly-monotonically-increasing area section located downstream of an air inlet throat, between the inlet and an engine/combustor. The purposes for the isolator may be to separate fluctuations between conditions in the inlet and the combustor, to provide a desired flow profile to the combustor, to reduce problems with inlet unstart and/or combustion stability. The isolator may also provide additional pressure rise upstream of the combustor when the combustor demands it.
Isolators can have shock systems set up along their lengths. The resulting shock train can create pressure rises that match those demanded by the combustor. This pressure rise must not allow pressure communications to travel through the isolator boundary layer and upstream past the inlet throat or allow the shock train to extend upstream of the inlet throat, both potentially resulting in unstart of the inlet. The isolator removes dynamic cross-talk between fluctuations in the inlet or combustor that can result in inlet unstart or engine flame-out/stall. Strong shock-boundary layer interactions can occur within the isolator, especially on the body-side of a vehicle where the boundary layer is thickest and has a more depleted energy profile. These strong shock interactions with weak boundary layers can result in lower pressure-rise capability and/or high distortion of the flow profile (mass flux, Mach Number, total pressure, etc.) at the isolator exit, which will be ingested by the engine and may reduce combustion efficiency or cause engine stall/flame-out.
Integrated airbreathing hypersonic vehicles usually suffer from highly distorted flow profiles at the combustor face, which is known to reduce combustion efficiency substantially and has the effect of reducing the vehicle's range and acceleration capabilities. Also, separated regions induced by strong shock-wave boundary layer interactions during isolator back pressured conditions, especially in isolators with oblique shock train systems, can cause separation zones in the isolator to propagate to the combustor face. These separation zones generally occur on the body-side and centerline of the vehicle where the boundary layer has built-up the thickest and where low momentum flow tends to collect with many high Mach Number inlet design methodologies. This opens-up the possibility for combustion gases to become entrained in the isolator with high potential to cause a burn-through of the isolator. Distorted inlet flow profiles generally have low momentum regions which can reduce the isolator maximum back pressure capability as well.
A flight vehicle engine isolator includes an inner-mold-line swept-back ramp or wedge that anchors a shock or shocks at a forward part of the wedge, such as at a bottom of the isolator.
A flight vehicle engine isolator includes an inner-mold-line swept-back ramp or wedge that improves flow mixing.
A flight vehicle engine isolator includes an inner-mold-line swept-back ramp or wedge that reduces or removes downstream/isolator exit flow separation (and thereby greatly reduces risk of isolator burn-through).
Removal of flow non-uniformities before they occur along the isolator length and removal of the majority of flow separations due to the isolator geometry reduces losses, allows the isolator to reach higher back pressures than it could otherwise.
The ability of the isolator features to create stronger shock anchoring at high back pressures also improves the maximum back pressure capability of an engine.
An isolator inner-mold-line geometry shaping may improve maximum throttle capability (maximum back pressure capability).
An isolator inner-mold-line geometry shaping improves off-design performance.
According to an aspect of the invention, a flight vehicle includes: a fuselage; and a propulsion system mechanically coupled to the fuselage. The propulsion system includes: an air inlet; an isolator downstream of the air inlet; and a combustor downstream of the isolator. The isolator includes a swept-back wedge on the inner-mold-line of the isolator. In operation a forward part of the wedge produces an oblique shock, and features of the wedge divert boundary-layer and core flow that is close to the surface of the wedge, radially outboard and circumferentially along the walls of the isolator as the flow proceeds axially downstream through the isolator, to improve flow mixing.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the features of the wedge are an aft part of the wedge.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the forward part of the wedge is at a bottom-centerline of the isolator; and the aft part of the wedge is along the outboard sides of the isolator.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the oblique shock produced at the forward part of the wedge due to back pressure impositions is part of a shock train that also includes an additional oblique shock produced at a location on the isolator that is diametrically opposed to the forward part of the wedge.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the swept-back wedge is a band around the isolator, with the band angled relative to an axial direction along the isolator.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the forward part of the wedge is at a bottom of the isolator.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the wedge has a maximum compression angle at the forward part.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the compression angle tapers from the maximum at the bottom to a minimum at the aft part of the wedge, along sides of the isolator.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the maximum compression angle is 5°-50°.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the wedge has a sweep back angle of 20°-75°.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the swept-back wedge is flush with walls of the isolator downstream of the wedge, so as to blend in with the downstream wedge shape.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, a minimum compression angle at an aft part of the wedge is zero.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method of reducing low energy flow in an isolator of a propulsion system of a flight vehicle includes the steps of: producing an oblique shock at a forward part of a swept-back wedge that is part of the isolator during back pressure demands from the combustor; and turning flow through the isolator using the wedge, wherein the wedge diverts boundary-layer and core flow, radially outboard and circumferentially along walls of the isolator as the flow proceeds axially downstream through the isolator, to thereby improve flow mixing.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the method further includes the wedge producing additional weaker shocks.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the method includes producing the oblique shock at a bottom of the isolator.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, turning the flow also includes directing the flow from the bottom and from sides of the isolator, to a top of the isolator.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, turning the flow includes diverting boundary layer streamlines toward running parallel to or parallel but moving outward conically to a leading edge of the wedge.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, a shock train of the oblique shocks produced by the swept-back wedge reduces a separation region at the top or sides of the isolator, relative to an isolator not having the swept-back wedge.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a method of reducing low energy flow in an isolator of a propulsion flowpath of a flight vehicle includes the steps of: setting up swept oblique shocks along the length of a swept-back wedge that is part of the isolator; turning the viscous and non-viscous flow outboard and upward with velocity vectors consistent with the swept-back wedge geometry and incoming flow conditions; and generating oblique shocks at intersections of sidewalls of the isolator and the swept-back wedge, to further instigate flow turning upward along the sidewalls.
According to an embodiment of any paragraph(s) of this summary, the method further includes flow through the isolator wrapping along the sidewalls and upward within the isolator, thereby reducing a separation zone within the isolator, and mixing in high energy flow with lower energy flow in an upper portion of the isolator.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The annexed drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, show various aspects of the invention.
A flight vehicle engine includes an isolator with a swept-back wedge to improve flow mixing. The wedge includes forward shock-anchoring locations, such as edges or rapidly-curved portions, that anchor oblique shocks in situations where the isolator has sufficient back pressure. The swept-back wedge may also create swept oblique shocks along its length. Boundary layer flow streamlines are diverted running parallel to or parallel but moving outward conically to the swept-wedge leading edge moving outboard and upward. This flow may create and propagate vortices as well, which may increase the energy of this flow and folds-in high energy non-viscous flow. The non-viscous flow outside the boundary layer is processed through the swept-back ramp shock and diverted outboard and upward as well, with velocity vectors consistent with the swept-back wedge geometry and incoming flow conditions. The outboard aft portion of the wedge close to and at the sidewall intersection may also induce shocks and divert flow near the walls closer toward the walls, and/or improve flow mixing, such as by diverting the collecting flow that has been directed toward this region upward along the sides of the isolator and toward the top of the isolator, where low-energy flow and/or a flow separation regions may be located.
The propulsion system 12 may be coupled to the fuselage 14 in any of a variety ways, including parts of the propulsion system 12 being integrally formed with parts of the fuselage 14. The fuselage 14 may have any of a variety of suitable shapes, and may include additional components for carrying out one or more operations of the air vehicle 10. Such additional components, to give a few non-limiting examples, may include control systems (such as for steering), lift-producing and/or control surfaces (such as wings, fins, or canards, either fixed in position or movable in whole or in part), communication systems, cooling systems, sensors or other data-collecting systems, and/or any of a variety of payloads.
With reference in addition to
The combustor 24 may be any of variety of suitable devices for burning a fuel-air or fuel-oxidizer mixture and producing thrust. For example the combustor 24 (and/or the engine 12) may be a ramjet, a scramjet, a dual-mode ramjet/scramjet, or perhaps a turbojet. In
The inlet 20 may have any of a variety of suitable shapes, for example being round, elliptical, or rectangular. The isolator 22 may have a general shape that makes the transition between a square, rectangular, trapezoidal or elliptical shape of the inlet 20 (to give a few examples) to a round or other-shaped combustor 24. The inlet 20 and the combustor 24 may be in line with each other, or may be offset from one another and at different angular orientations.
The swept-back wedge 44 on the bottom of the isolator 22 is a ramped portion of the wall of the isolator 22 and is configured to compress the flow to generate and anchor shocks at desired locations, and to turn some of the flow through the isolator 22 to encourage flow mixing and reduce separation regions throughout the isolator 22. Weaker shocks can setup parallel to the wedge 44 across the entire length of it, providing further anchoring. In the illustrated embodiment the wedge 44 is a band that stretches around a perimeter of the wall of the isolator 22, with the band being angled so as to be axially forward (closer to the upstream inlet) at the top on the symmetry plane of the isolator 22, and axially farther back (farther from the upstream inlet) at the sides of the isolator 22. A bottom part 52 of the wedge 44 acts as a shock generator and an anchor point 54 for strong oblique shocks within the isolator 22 when moderate to high pressure rises are demanded by the combustor 24. At the top of the isolator 22 an oblique shock is located at 56.
The angle of the wedge 44 at the bottom of the isolator 22 may be chosen to achieve the desired amount of compression. This compression sets up a shock train 60 to meet the demand. The compression surfaces of the wedge 44 divert boundary layer as well as high energy core flow that is near the isolator bottom surface to flow outboard and upward which reduces the size of a separation region 62, caused by the forward-most oblique shock, in which flow separates from the wall of the isolator 22, and recirculates therein. The band 44 may have varying wedge angles along its perimeter with the steepest angles in the center (at the bottom of the isolator 22 and this angle approaching zero as one moves outboard toward the bands widest parts 64 to the sidewalls. The bottom (forward) part 52 sets up a strong oblique shock, and the remainder of the wedge 44 diverts boundary-layer and some core flow (close to the boundary layer) outboard to the isolator sidewalls, to improve flow mixing. The swept-back wedge 44 may be flush with walls of the isolator 22 downstream of the wedge 44, so as to blend in with the downstream wedge shape. Alternatively there may be a discontinuity, such as a step, on the downstream side of the wedge 44. Such a discontinuity may be used to set up a desired shock orientation to re-orient velocity vectors, diverting or directing the flow as desired.
The band 44 may be tapered from the bottom 52 to the sides, with the compression angle of the wedge (the amount of compression) decreasing from a maximum value to zero (or a non-zero minimum). The (maximum) wedge compression angle may be 10°-30°, or more broadly 5°-50°, to give some (non-limiting) values. As an alternative to the use of a band, there may be wedges at discrete locations around a perimeter of the isolator, at different axial stations. As yet another additional alternative, the band along the top of the isolator only acts as an expansion surface, and can be blended into the surrounding geometry of the isolator 22. As yet another additional alternative, the band 44 may be have a constant compression wedge 44 angle across the entire surface at the bottom 52 of the isolator 22.
With reference now to
Features at the bottom of the isolator 22 help improve the desirable flow mixing. The wedge 44 has a drastically increasing geometry slope, with discrete or continuous but rapid geometry changes that create a swept compression ramp. This wedge 44, when placed correctly axially, with the right sweep angle and shock wedge angle, greatly increases flow upwash of the high energy flow around the inner-mold-line of the isolator 22. The swept feature also rolls more high energy flow toward the wall due to the large pressure gradients imposed by the swept shocks. This flow is subsequently deflected upwards, again increasing upwash. Duct shaping, when positioned correctly, creates a “whip” effect on the flow as well, further improving upwash. This shaping is accomplished by tailoring the swept-back wedge to sidewall geometry intersection and by a drastic duct height increase by either following the tangent angle at the downstream-end of the swept-back compression wedge or by further increasing the instantaneous upward angle of the isolator 22 immediately downstream of the swept-back wedge 44. Cross-sectional area distributions along the length of the isolator may be monotonically increasing, or alternatively these diffusion rates may be tailored along the length to achieve other specific goals. All of this upwash translates down the isolator 22 (in the direction downstream) and results in colliding of different flow streams and mixing with the low energy or separated flow that is present in the top or side portions of the isolator 22.
The wedge 44 may set up swept oblique shocks along its length. This may produce turning of the viscous and non-viscous flow outboard and upward with velocity vectors consistent with the swept-back wedge geometry and incoming flow conditions. Further, there may be generating of oblique shocks at intersections of sidewalls of the isolator and the swept-back wedge, further instigating flow turning upward along the sidewalls. Flow through the isolator 22 may be pushed from inboard locations outboard and wrap along the sidewalls and upward within the isolator 22, thereby reducing the separation zone within the isolator 22, and may mix in high energy flow with lower energy flow in an upper portion of the isolator 22.
The improved mixing and removal of the majority of flow separations due to the tailored isolator geometry reduces losses, allowing the isolator to reach higher back pressures. The ability of the features to create stronger shock anchoring at high back pressures also improves the maximum back pressure capability.
Bifurcated flows with low/high momentum flow disparities from top to bottom caused by oblique shock trains generally have separated flow regions in the low momentum regions, especially in highly constrained systems where isolator length is low or S-duct height is high and separations cannot be avoided. The above-mentioned geometric features that create upwash of the high energy flow around the circumference remove this separation and mitigate the potential of entraining combustion products from the engine into the isolator and subsequently burning through the isolator.
Oblique shocks are mentioned herein. It will be appreciated that normal shocks may also occur in some places as an alternative to oblique shocks.
Tailored isolator inner-mold-line geometry shaping encourages shock anchoring which improves off-design performance and consistency by keeping the shock train positioning consistent across a wide range of flight conditions and throttle (back pressure demand) settings. Also, the low momentum and separated regions in typical isolators change location and size based on operating condition, throttle setting and in time (transient conditions), all of which lead to distortion pattern changes at the combustor entrance which may reduce combustion efficiency if an active fuel injection scheme is not incorporated. Removing these variations by mixing-out the low energy flow regions improves consistency across the flight envelope and throttle settings and either simplifies the engine or improves combustion efficiency, both of which increase specific impulse (fuel efficiency) and/or thrust at a given throttle setting.
In the isolator 22 (
Further variations are possible. For example, all of the illustrated embodiment isolators have constant areas and constant cross-sections in the forward portion, before the swept-back wedge. This is not necessary or required, and other embodiments may have a different configuration.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to a certain preferred embodiment or embodiments, it is obvious that equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described elements (components, assemblies, devices, compositions, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such elements are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any element which performs the specified function of the described element (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary embodiment or embodiments of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been described above with respect to only one or more of several illustrated embodiments, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other embodiments, as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/833,526, filed Dec. 6, 2017, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under contract HR0011-17-C-0025 awarded by the United States Department of Defense. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2788183 | Ferri | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2975587 | Rae | Mar 1961 | A |
| 2989846 | Hausammann | Jun 1961 | A |
| 3027118 | Willox | Mar 1962 | A |
| 3027711 | Rae | Apr 1962 | A |
| 3062484 | Himka | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3066892 | Thomas | Dec 1962 | A |
| 3417767 | Young | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3777488 | Gross et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 4170110 | Radin | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4378097 | Ferguson | Mar 1983 | A |
| 5058837 | Wheeler | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5082206 | Kutschenreuter, Jr. et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5301901 | Kutschenreuter, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5598990 | Farokhi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5660040 | Henry et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5749542 | Hamstra et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5779189 | Hamstra et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5881758 | Koncsek | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5971000 | Koncsek | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6793175 | Sanders et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6881758 | Guillard et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7048229 | Sanders et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7207520 | Lundy et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 8256706 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8292217 | Smith et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8359825 | Alvi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8403271 | Domel et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8434723 | Simpson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8656957 | Babinsky et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8662453 | Richards | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 9447731 | Adamson et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9758253 | Troia et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9874144 | Huynh | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9896219 | Adamson et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 10190539 | Bowcutt et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10590848 | Cicchini | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 20060107648 | Bulman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070235590 | Kokoshkin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080060361 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092519 | Bulman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080128547 | Pederson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271787 | Henne et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283677 | Pederson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090288711 | Alvi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313968 | Smith et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100181436 | Richards | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20120049008 | Domel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120325325 | Quackenbush et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20140182697 | Davidenko et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140224949 | Mark et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20160244177 | Adamson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160273452 | Huynh | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160376018 | Troia et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160376987 | Huynh | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170002768 | Bowcutt et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20180274486 | O'Brien et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180347461 | Cicchini | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180347462 | Cicchini | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1445465 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1898080 | Mar 2008 | EP |
| 911074 | Nov 1962 | GB |
| 2343297 | Apr 2007 | RU |
| 2017158857 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/833,526, filed Dec. 6, 2017. |
| Maheswaran et al., “Computational Analysis The Effect of Micro Vortex Generator in E2R Scramjet Engine”, May 2013, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. |
| Sabean et al., “Computational Optimization of a Hypersonic Rectangular-to-Circular Inlet”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 17, No. 3, May-Jun. 2001, pp. 571-578. |
| Gounko et al., “Numerical investigation of flow over two sweepback wedges at M=4 and 6”, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, vol. 20, No. 2, 2013, pp. 179-193. |
| Settles et al., “Investigation of Three-Dimensional Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions at Swept Compression Corners”, AIAA Journal, vol. 18, No. 7, Jul. 1980, pp. 779-785. |
| Settles et al., “Cylindrical and Conical Flow Regimes of Three-Dimensional Shock/Boundry-Layer Interactions”, AIAA Journal, vol. 22, Feb. 1984, pp. 194-200. |
| Inger, “Supersonic Viscous-Inviscid Interaction of a Swept Ramp with a Turbulent Boundary Layer”, AIAA-85-1669,Jul. 1985, 60 pages. |
| Stalker, “Spanwise Propagation of Disturbances in Swept Shock Wave—Boundary Layer Interactions”, AIAA-82-0988, Jun. 1982, 9 pages. |
| Zheltovodov et al., “Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions”, Chapter 5.3.4 “Swept Compression Ramp; Interaction and Its Modeling”, 2011, pp. 230-237. |
| Gun'ko, Yu., and I. Mazhul'. “Numerical Investigation of Flow Past a System of Two Sweptback Compression Wedges.” Fluid Dynamics, vol. 49, No. 2, Mar. 2014, pp. 259-269. EBSCOhost, doi: 10.1134/S0015462814020148. (Year: 2014). |
| Gun'ko, Yu., and I. Mazhul'. “Supersonic Flow Past a System of Two Swept Wedges Mounted on a Preliminary Compression Surface.” Fluid Dynamics, vol. 48, No. 2, Mar. 2013, pp. 260-270. EBSCOhost, doi: 10.1134/S0015462813020130. (Year: 2013). |
| Gounko, Yu. P., and I. I. Mazhul. “Supersonic Flow over Paired Compression Wedges of Different Sweep Installed on the Pre-Compression Surface.” Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, No. 1, 2015, p. 1. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1134/S0869864315010011 (Year: 2015). |
| Sabean et al., “Optimization of a Hypersonic Inlet with a Rectangular to Circular Transition”, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, AIAA 99-0612, 1999, pp. 1-9.017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210246850 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15833526 | Dec 2017 | US |
| Child | 17242394 | US |
