Larger scale biological purification/filtration of gas and liquid materials requires correspondingly larger scale purification/filtration devices, including filtration media. The design and development of such devices are limited by several parameters, for example, the need for large specific surface area filter media (to increase efficiency), the tendency of filtration media to collapse or fold under the combined load of biomass and liquid, and the commercial pressure to minimize the footprint of the device. Filter media composed of a corrugated bacterial bed rolled into a “jelly roll” configuration with spaced apart channels for water flow have been suggested for use in the purification of sewer water. Other prior art devices use external structures to provide structural strength to the media material within the reactor vessels, for example “wagon wheel” configured metal scaffolding around which filter media is disposed or web-like support elements that encased the filter media. However, the external structures alone cannot prevent collapse of the media and such configurations may be prone to clogging by excess biomass. Moreover, the scaffold-like support structures occupy space in the reactor that could be filled by ‘live’ media, thereby eroding the efficiency of the system.
Thus, there remains need in the art for filtration media, modules and devices that optimize performance of the filtration activity, including optimizing mass transfer (and therefore optimization of filtration/biological oxidation efficiency), provide for retention of more microorganisms per unit of volume of media, and that enhance the “life expectancy” of the filtration media itself, allowing for longer use before replacement or maintenance (necessitated, for example, by collapse of mat material or clogging of mat with biomass that has overproliferated) as compared to conventional filtration equipment.
The invention includes a filtration medium for the purification of a liquid or a gas material that includes a mat having a first surface and a second surface. At least one of the first surface or the second surface is substantially non-planar. The mat comprises a foamed resin having a density of about 1 lbs/ft3 to about 3 lbs/ft3 and/or an indentation load deflection of about 35 lbs to about 150 lbs.
Also included in the invention is a filtration medium for the purification of a liquid or a gas material comprising at least two mats, each mat having a first surface and a second surface, wherein at least one of the first surface or the second surface is substantially non-planar and has a substantially non-uniform convolution profile.
Included are devices for the filtration of a liquid and/or a gas that comprise one or more reactor modules. The reactor modules include the filtration medium and a substantially cylindrical chamber and/or a substantially rectangular chamber that may include sides, a top and a bottom. The chamber additionally includes a base that extends from the sides of the chamber towards the interior of the chamber and the filtration medium is disposed within the chamber.
Methods of filtering a gas or liquid material using the filtration medium are also provided, as are methods of fabrication of the modules.
The foregoing summary as well as the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention may be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings:
The invention provides a filtration medium that can be used to filter various liquid or gas materials. The filtration medium may be inoculated with a biomass (most often primarily bacterial or fungal (yeast) in nature; often a specific strain or mixture of strains) that oxidizes or breaks down compounds in the gas or liquid as it passes across the medium. The filtration media, modules, and devices of the invention were developed to emphasize performance of the filtration activity, including enhancement of mass transfer (and therefore enhancement of filtration/oxidation efficiency) and improvement of the adherence of microorganisms to the media (providing increased number of microorganisms per unit volume of media) as well as enhance the “life expectancy” of the filtration medium itself, allowing for longer use before replacement or maintenance of the filtration medium (necessitated, for example, by collapse of mat material or clogging of mat with biomass that has overproliferated) as compared to conventional biological filtration mediums and/or modules.
The invention includes a filtration medium for the purification or filtration of a liquid or a gas material, such as wastewater, or reduction and elimination of odorous compounds in water, gas or other emissions. The filtration medium includes a mat that has a first surface and second surface and may be of any size or format. In general, it may be desirable that the mat has a substantially rectangular prism format; however, depending on the end use and the specifics of the module or device into which it is to be fitted, the size, shape, and format may be varied. In an embodiment, the mat has thickness (i.e., length of Z axis of the mat) of about ¼ inches to about 4 inches, alternatively, about ¾ inches to about 3 inches, or about 1 inch to about 2 inches in thickness. In most applications the mat may be 1 inch thick or greater.
As explained above, the length and width of the mat may vary, but in most circumstances it may be preferable that the length dimension of the mat is greater than the width dimension. For example, the length dimension of the mat may be about 2 to about 35 times greater than the width dimension or about 400 to about 750 times greater than the width dimension. In some embodiments, the mat may be any shape, including plan view polygon (irregular or regular), circle, rectangle (including square), oval, ellipse, or triangle. The format of the mat will vary depending on the format of the reactor chamber that is selected.
The mat or mats used may be unitary or may be formed of two or more sections of mat pieces together to form the desired geometry. The sections may be attached to one another in any manner, such as, for example, by glue, staples, they may be sewed together or joined by heat fusion or heat seaming.
In an embodiment, the mat has a first surface and a second surface, at least one of which is non-planar, wholly or in part. By non-planar, it is meant that the surface, when viewed from the side (i.e., as a profile) is not flat, but rather is convoluted and exhibits surfaces terminating in at least two different planes in space (the “peak” and the “valley” points), thereby expanding the surface area of the mat available for bacterial (biomass) adherence. The structures that provide the non-planar characteristics are described by their “convolution profiles” as discussed below.
In some embodiments, the mat may have each side with a non-planar surface. The mat may be multilayered; for example it may have 2 to 95 layers. As an example, the mat may consist of three or more layers, wherein one or both of the outer layer(s) had a non-planar surface (i.e., bears a convolution profile as noted above).
At least one of the mat's surfaces has a non-continuous convolution profile, that is, when viewed in cross section the surface is substantially non-planar and such characteristic is provided to the surface by convolutions that are arranged so that, when sequential cross sections of the mat are viewed, the “peak” and “valley” of the first cross section are located along the mat in a different place than the “peak” and “valley” of the subsequent cross section. This non-uniform placement of the convolutions provides turbulence to the material being passed through the filter. This differs from a foam mat having uniform corrugations, that is a profile such that when sequential cross sections of such a mat are viewed, they are substantially identical in relative placement of the “peak” and the “valley” of the convolutions.
The surface convolutions may take the form of random convolutions, ordered or patterned convolutions or any combination of these. For example, with reference to
The surface convolutions may be placed or spaced on the surface(s) of the mat in any manner to create the profiles discussed above. For example, as shown in
The mat may comprise a foamed resin. The resin may be any known or developed in the art that permits at least a minimal level of bacterial adhesion. Thermoplastic resins may be preferred. In some embodiments, the resin may be, for example, a phenolic resin, a urethane resin, a polyurethane resin, a polyolefin, a nylon, a polystyrene, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyether, polyester and/or copolymer and derivatives of such polymers. The foamed resin may be a reticulated or open cell foamed resin.
In some embodiments, it may be preferred that the foamed resin is a polyurethane, an ester polyurethane, or an ether polyurethane. Such foamed resins may be prepared by any means known in the art. As an example, if the selected foamed resin is an ether polyurethane foam, it may be made by, for example, by first forming a cellular polyurethane foam that has a network of a least some strands and at least some cell windows by mixing together foam-forming compounds.
As is known to a person of skill in the art, the recipes for polyurethane foam are expressed in terms of parts by weight per 100 parts of polyol. Thus, for example, for each 100 parts by weight of a polyether polyol, the foam formulation according to the invention includes: about 20.0 to about 60.0 parts by weight of an isocyanate; about 1.5 to about 5.0 parts of a blowing agent, such as water; about 0.20 to about 4.0 parts of a blow catalyst; about 0.0 to about 1.0 parts of a gel catalyst, and about 1.0 to about 3.0 parts of stabilizing surfactant, such as a silicone surfactant. Other additives such as dyes, pigments, colorants, crosslinking additives may also be incorporated into the foam formulation. After the foam forming components have been mixed together, the foam is permitted to rise and cure, preferably under atmospheric temperature and pressure. The resulting foam has pore sizes preferably in the range of about 8 to about 50 pores per linear inch. The foam is further reticulated to remove any cell windows. This process renders the foam with minimum resistance to fluid flow. Reticulation is carried out by melting the windows by, for example, a high temperature flame front to heat the cell windows or walls to above the melting point of the polymer. Thus, by carefully regulating the conditions under which this process is carried out, the cell windows can be melted without adversely affecting or melting the skeletal strands. The resulting foam will permit air flows through the foam in a range of about 10 to about 50 cubic feet per minute when measured through a 2 inch by 2 inch by 1 inch foam sample.
Regardless of the type of foamed resin selected, the selected material or materials may be substantially hydrophobic or substantially hydrophilic, depending on the specific end application of the mat and the desired level of bacterial adherence necessary or desired. The material may be selected for its inherent capacity to promote the growth of certain desirable bacterial strains and/or retard the growth of other, less desirable microorganisms, depending on the end application for the media. In some embodiments, it is desirable that the materials selected are suitable for maintaining a bacterial population so that, in practice, at least 90%, at least 80%, at least 70%, or at least 60% of the volume of filter medium is capable of supporting biomass, thereby improving the number of microorganisms per unit volume and, consequently, the efficiency per unit volume of the system.
In some embodiments where the filtered material is a gas, it may be preferred that the material selected has a porosity of at least about 99%, at least about 95%, at least about 90%, or at least about 85%, to facilitate permeation of the gas phase to the bacterial population.
Additionally, the mat may be coated with a material that enhances bacterial attachment (and/or selectively promotes or retards growth of specific microorganism) and/or such additives may be mixed into the foamed resin material prior to cure. For example, the foamed resin may contain an anti-mycotic or a differentially selective antibacterial compound. The foamed resin may be coated with any substance to alter or enhance desirable properties. Suitable coatings may include acrylic polymer and/or acrylic copolymers and latex emulsions.
In an embodiment, the mat of the filtration medium is configured into a cylindrical format (33). With reference to
The winding tension applied will vary depending on the material used, the type of convolutions, the end application and other factors. However, in an embodiment, it may be desirable to have a winding tension of about 1 to about 40 lbs per foam width (ft) or about 2 to about 20 lbs per foam width (ft). In an embodiment, the winding tension may be about 4 lbs/ft. The modification of winding tension allows for adjustment in turbulence created by the medium and to which the filtered material is subjected as it passes though the medium.
In an embodiment, the mat is rolled with sufficient winding tension such that contact of at least a portion of first surface (25) to the second surface (26) is made. If too much space is permitted between the layers of the rolled cylindrical format (33), the liquid or gas material may pass through the medium at too high a rate to enable mass transfer at optimum efficiency. In an embodiment where the filtration medium is used to remove certain odorous compounds from air, it may be desirable to ensure that the first surface and the second surface of the mat are substantially in continuous contact when the mat is rolled in cylindrical format. Preferably, the mat is wound in a manner that avoids formation of substantially any straight line or direct channels through the filter medium.
In an alternative configuration, the mat used may be of a polygon geometry (such as a rectangular) format. Two or more mats of substantially similar dimensions may be arranged together in a vertical stack, as shown for example in
The selected foamed resin used for the mat may have one or more mechanical characteristics that provide structural support for the mat during the filtration process once it is loaded with biomass and fluid weight. In an embodiment, the foamed resin has at least one mechanical characteristic chosen from a density of about 1 lbs/ft3 to about 3 lbs/ft3, alternatively, about 1.2 lbs/ft3 to about 2.5 lbs/ft3, or about 1.8 lbs/ft3.
Additionally or alternatively, it may be preferable that the foamed resin from which the mat is made of a moderate to high firmness. Firmness may be quantified by several methods/protocols in the art, including determination of a given material's indentation load deflection. Indentation load deflection (ILD) is the force required to deflect the foam 25% (by volume) in pounds (lbs). ILD is a well-known method of analysis and may be carried out, for example, as directed in ASTM D3574-95.
In an embodiment of the invention, one of the mechanical characteristics of the foamed resin is an indentation load deflection of about 35 lbs to about 150 lbs, about 75 lbs to about 120 lbs, or about 85 lbs to about 105 lbs. It may be suitable for the foamed resin to exhibit both a higher density and a greater firmness (i.e., within the parameters noted above), although the presence of only one of these mechanical characteristics may be present if the mat has sufficient mechanical strength to bear the load of biomass and/or added liquid in the specific application into which is it placed.
The mechanical characteristics of density and/or ILD may be uniform throughout the foamed resin of the mat, or the resin may be formulated or assembled such that the mechanical characteristic(s) vary from area to area of the mat. For example, if the mat is in the form of a substantially rectangular prism, it may be desirable that the mechanical characteristic(s) of the foamed resin is present as a decreasing or increasing gradient along the X-axis of the prism, i.e., a hypothetical geometric axis initiating at a point on the first surface and terminating at a point on the second surface. (For purposes of clarity, it is noted that this geometric axis is an axis of the mat itself and is therefore different that the winding axis described above). As an example, the ILD of the foamed resin may be about 100 lbs. at the first surface, then decreases along the geometric X axis and may be about 25 lbs. at the second surface, or the pore size of the foamed resin may be about 4 to about 8 ppi at the first surface, the decreases along the geometric X axis to be about 25 to about 35 ppi at the second surface. Alternatively, the mat may include two or more discrete layers of foamed resins, each of which exhibits a different magnitude of the selected mechanical characteristic. In such configuration, it is preferred that the layer or portion of the mat that forms the exteriormost (or the interiormost) region of the cylindrical format is the layer or portion having the greater ILD and/or density.
The foamed resins may exhibit other mechanical or chemical properties. The nominal pore size of the foamed resin may vary; it may be dictated by the specific end application or desired use. In an embodiment, foamed resin has a nominal pore size of about 5 pores per liner inch (ppi) to about 70 ppi, about 7 to about 35 ppi or about 10 to about 25 ppi.
Nominal distribution of pores within foamed resin may also be varied. However, it may be preferred that pore distribution is about 5 to about 70, alternatively, about 10 to about 40.
The foamed resin of the mat may be prepared of a neat resin. Alternatively, it may be desirable to include various additives in the resin to improve or modify performance, durability, water sheddability, handling and other properties. For example, it may be desirable to include clays, UV absorbers or protectants, antimycotic agents, antibacterial components (for example, if selective for specific types of undesirable bacteria), colorants, deodorizers, fragrances, crafted polyols and combinations thereof.
The invention also includes a device for the filtration of a liquid or gas material. The device may include one or more reactor modules. The reactor modules include a filtration medium (as described herein). In an embodiment, the reactor module includes at least one chamber. It may be any configuration, such as square, polygonal or rectangle or circular in cross-section.
A given device of the invention may include one or more reactor modules that contain the filtration media discussed above and, optionally, a lid or cover. Within a device, each reactor module may be identical (that is same type and structure of foam and/or biomass). Alternatively, each reactor module may be targeted to remove or oxidize a particular contaminant and therefore necessarily contain a structurally different mat and/or contain a mat that has been inoculated with a specific type of microorganism that is know to reduce the targeted contaminant. The devices may also include other features that aid in the efficiency of the process, such as baffles to facilitate the even distribution of gas or liquid through the device; spray nozzles situated to permit moistening of the media and/or delivery of other substances to the media; and/or collection or elimination systems.
Referencing
In some embodiments, the modules may contain one or more mediums (for example, layer within a chamber). Such media ay be the same or may be different. For example, at least one medium may be a medium of the invention and the other(s) may be of another type of medium, such as, for example, charcoal, carbon, wood chips, compost, fiberglass, paper, silica, and/or clay. Similarly, the device may include one or more modules, each modules having a different medium or set of media.
In an embodiment, the base (9) is in the form of a grate, support beams, posts, wire shelf or combinations of these. The selected filtration medium (11) is disposed within the chamber (3) such that the winding axis (29) of the mat (35) is substantially parallel to the sides of the chamber (3) and the filtration medium rests within the chamber (3) on the base (9). Optionally, a spacer may be placed between the base (9) and the filtration medium (11), and/or between any adjacently stacked mediums. Such spacer may be adapted to promote even distribution of the material undergoing filtration through the medium and/or to create turbulence in the material.
Also included within the scope of the invention are methods of filtering a gas or liquid material. Such methods include applying a gas or liquid material to the filtration medium described above, preferably when such medium is disposed within the device described above.
For example, if material to be filtered is a gas, foul air enters the bottom of the chamber (1) through port (15) after which it is equalized in the bottom portion of chamber (1) before it flows at substantially equal upflow velocity through the cross section of the filtration medium (11). While the air flows through the filtration medium (11), the odorous and other compounds in the air are transferred to the microorganisms that oxidize the compounds to non-odorous compounds. The filtration media may be separated to include an equalization layer between the filtration media. While the air is flowing through the filtration medium (11), potable or substantially clean wastewater effluent is sprayed on top of the filtration medium (11) at uniform flow distribution. The water is used to remove the microbial products of oxidation, dead microorganisms, enhance mass transfer of compounds from air to water and microorganisms, and keep the microorganisms moist to allow for optimum growth. The water flow may be intermittent or continuous. The chamber (1) is fitted with a roof (39) and the filtered air exits the roof (39) through port (21).
Referencing
The individual mats in the vertical stack of
Referencing
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of priority to copending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/581,686, filed Oct. 19, 2009, which in turn claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/106,467, filed Oct. 17, 2008, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2883058 | Rene | Apr 1959 | A |
3112261 | Porter et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3347381 | Minch et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3365864 | Yoshitomo | Jan 1968 | A |
3506600 | Zocco et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3552553 | Reading | Jan 1971 | A |
3720319 | White | Mar 1973 | A |
3842804 | Christensen et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3847811 | Stengelin et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3925248 | Moroni et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3947362 | Etani | Mar 1976 | A |
3957017 | Carmignani et al. | May 1976 | A |
4039448 | Etani | Aug 1977 | A |
4165281 | Kuriyama et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4178161 | Galica et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4192742 | Bebin et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4334944 | Creyf et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4421534 | Walker | Dec 1983 | A |
4427548 | Quick | Jan 1984 | A |
4469599 | Gros et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4503150 | Triolo | Mar 1985 | A |
4555342 | Grant | Nov 1985 | A |
4576718 | Reischl et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4620917 | Nozawa et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4662900 | Ottengraf | May 1987 | A |
4696747 | Verstraete et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4758460 | Spicer et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760027 | Sublette | Jul 1988 | A |
4810385 | Hater et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4826882 | Bredbenner et al. | May 1989 | A |
4861465 | Augustyniak | Aug 1989 | A |
4869824 | Melin et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4877527 | Brownell | Oct 1989 | A |
4908128 | Chiba | Mar 1990 | A |
4911843 | Hunniford et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4931183 | Klein et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4988436 | Cole | Jan 1991 | A |
5031261 | Fenner | Jul 1991 | A |
5084164 | Del | Jan 1992 | A |
5096591 | Benn | Mar 1992 | A |
5116506 | Williamson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5139543 | Sowinski | Aug 1992 | A |
5232676 | Wolff et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5270207 | Matsumura et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273818 | Kim et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5348654 | Fischer | Sep 1994 | A |
5445660 | Koers | Aug 1995 | A |
5563069 | Yang | Oct 1996 | A |
5578114 | Oude | Nov 1996 | A |
5718823 | Tomita et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5762784 | Jowett | Jun 1998 | A |
5858768 | Bonnin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6087159 | Finn | Jul 2000 | A |
6100081 | Buelna | Aug 2000 | A |
6168711 | Teramachi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194198 | Koers | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221652 | Janssen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271020 | Coleman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283309 | Koers | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6531078 | Laine et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6602407 | Talbot et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6696284 | Haridas et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7276366 | Parker et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7530127 | Leifermann et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536739 | Poulos | May 2009 | B2 |
7621010 | Eltzroth | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7674306 | Bugli et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8318476 | Parker et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8673140 | Jowett et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8765451 | Schreuder | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9890343 | Ettl et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10434467 | Shen | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10493402 | Koers | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10543458 | Klok | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10661220 | Jackson | May 2020 | B2 |
10695716 | Harshman | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10974190 | Jackson | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11613710 | Roe | Mar 2023 | B2 |
20010034056 | Corey | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020023871 | Talbot et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20060042209 | Dallas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060134771 | Deshusses | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151655 | Johnston | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060216492 | Thomson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070096523 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180802 | Parker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070259416 | Parker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080184684 | Bugli et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080274020 | Matsuoka | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100089818 | Koers | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107872 | Bethell | May 2010 | A1 |
20100261266 | Nagamori | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120264197 | Mitariten | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140335001 | Niedringhaus | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20160200996 | Ettl et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20180311614 | Koers | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180333676 | Jameson | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190039001 | Le Roux | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190039020 | Mahajan | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190262769 | Jackson | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200246744 | Jackson | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210113959 | Little | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210253444 | Little | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20220241724 | Tee | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20240066439 | Le Roux | Feb 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2740898 | Apr 2017 | CA |
106621533 | May 2017 | CN |
4004030 | Aug 1991 | DE |
0190801 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0669155 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0903476 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2051381 | Apr 1971 | FR |
1281874 | Jul 1972 | GB |
2178447 | Feb 1987 | GB |
2180554 | Apr 1987 | GB |
H0389913 | Apr 1991 | JP |
H05312017 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H0947613 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H10272325 | Oct 1998 | JP |
6148819 | May 2017 | JP |
6259787 | Dec 2017 | JP |
2006009427 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2010045644 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Performance of High-Rate Biotrickling Filter Under Ultra-High H2S Loadings at a Municipal WWTP; by Louis D. le Roux and Matthew E. Johnson; published by BioAir Solutions; 11 Pages; 2010. (Year: 2010). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 3, 2010 in Application No. PCT/US09/61182 (11 pages). |
Japanese Response to Office Action of Jun. 3, 2016 in Divisional Application No. 2015-83330 (5 oaqes) (English claims). |
“Anaerobic Digester Improvement Project”, Oct. 2010, 31 pages. |
“Applicant Response to Examination Report No. 1 (May 19, 2022) in counterpart Australian Application No. 2020204464”, May 19, 2022. |
“Biofiltration Primer, CEP www.aiche.org/cep/”, Apr. 2001, 9 pages. |
“Biological Odor Control System”, 31 pages. |
“Biotrickling Filter Systems”, 19 pages. |
“Biotrickling Scrubber, Technical Specifications”, 16 pages. |
“Chinese Response to Reexamination Notification of Sep. 13, 2015”, Sep. 13, 2015, 14 pages. |
“Examination Report No. 1 (May 24, 2021) in counterpart Australian Application No. 2020204464”, May 24, 2021. |
“Japanese Notice of Final Rejection dated Dec. 11, 2014”, Dec. 11, 2014, 5 pages. |
“Japanese Response to Pre Appeal Exam Report dated Oct. 6, 2015”, Oct. 6, 2015, 10 pages. |
“Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Manufactured Odor Control System”, 11 pages. |
Indian Examination Report dated May 15, 2018 in Application No. 2817/DELNP/2011, May 15, 2018, 6 pages. |
“Northeast V\ANTP Biofilter Odor Control System”, 10 pages. |
“Notice of Acceptance (Jun. 2, 2022) in counterpart Australian Application No. 2020204464”, Jun. 2, 2022. |
“Odor Control Equipment Shreveport”, Aug. 2011, 16 pages. |
“Odor Control System”, Feb. 18, 2010, 30 pages. |
“Polyurethane Foam Association Brochure”, In Touch, May 1991, 3 pages. |
“Response to Second Chinese Office Action”, Jul. 23, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Section 41 70 19—Biotower Units”, Aug. 2011, 21 pages. |
200980149626.6 , “Second Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2014 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, Mar. 13, 2014, 30 pages. |
AU2009305531 , “Australian Examination Report dated Jun. 26, 2015 in Application No. 2009305531”, Examination Report, Jun. 26, 2015, 4 pages. |
AU2016203952 , “Australian Exam Report dated Jul. 3, 2017 in Application No. 2016203952”, Jul. 3, 2017, 3 pages. |
CA2,740,898 , “Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2015 in Application No. 2,740,898”, Office Action, Jan. 26, 2015, 3 pages. |
CA2,740,898 , “Response to Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2015 in Application No. 2,740,898”, Office Action, Jul. 24, 2015, 11 pages. |
CA2,740,898 , “Response to Second Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2016 in Application No. 2,740,898”, Second Canadian Office Action, Mar. 29, 2016, 8 pages. |
CA2,740,898 , “Second Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 in Application No. 2,740,898”, Office Action, Sep. 29, 2015, 3 pages. |
CA2,740,898 , “Third Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2016”, Office Action, Apr. 20, 2016, 3 pages. |
CN 200980149626.6 , “Chinese Office Action dated May 24, 2013 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, May 24, 2013, 28 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Chinese Decision of Reexamination dated May 19, 2016 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, May 19, 2016, 25 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Chinese Decision on Rejection of Sep. 2, 2014 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, Sep. 2, 2014, 26 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Chinese Notification of Reexamination of Jan. 4, 2016 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, Jan. 4, 2016, 24 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Chinese Reexamination Notification of May 29, 2015 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, May 29, 2015, 24 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Chinese Request for Reexamination dated Dec. 17, 2014 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, Dec. 17, 2014, 6 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Chinese Response to Second Notification of Reexamination of Apr. 5, 2016 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, Apr. 5, 2016, 21 pages. |
CN200980149626.6 , “Response to Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2013 in Application No. 200980149626.6”, Dec. 9, 2013, 18 pages. |
CN2018042601872070 , “Chinese Office Action dated May 2, 2018 in Divisional Application No. 2018042601872070”, May 2, 2018, 33 pages. |
EP09821392 , “European Search Report in Application No. EP09821392”, Nov. 29, 2012, 3 pages. |
EP09821392 , “Response to European Search Report dated Oct. 29, 2013 in Application No. EP09821392”, Oct. 29, 2013, 11 pages. |
EP09821392.9 , “European Communication with Examiner dated Apr. 24, 2018 in Application No. 09821392.9”, Apr. 24, 2018, 5 pages. |
Gabriel, David , et al., “Conversion of Full-Scale Wet Scrubbers to Biotrickling Filters for H2S Control at Publicly Owned Treatment Works”, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Oct. 2004, 8 pages. |
Gabriel, David , et al., “Performance of a Full-scale Biotrickling Filter Treating H2S at a Gas Contact Time of 1.6 to 2.2 Seconds”, Environmental Progress, vol. 22, No. 2, Jul. 2003, 9 pages. |
JP2011-532315 , “Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2013 in Application No. 2011-532315”, Oct. 24, 2013, 8 pages. |
JP2011-532315 , “Japanese Office Action of Sep. 16, 2016 in Application No. 2011-532315”, Sep. 16, 2016, 3 pages. |
JP2011-532315 , “Japanese Pre Appeal Exam Report dated Jul. 31, 2015 in Application No. 2011-532315”, Jul. 31, 2015, 3 pages. |
JP2011-532315 , “Japanese Response to Office Action of Mar. 16, 2017 in Application No. 2011-532315”, Mar. 16, 2017, 205 pages. |
JP2011-532315 , “Response to Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2014”, Office Action, Apr. 24, 2014, 36 pages. |
JP2011-532315 , “Second Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2014 in Application No. 2011-532315”, Dec. 15, 2014, 8 pages. |
JP2015-83330 , “Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2015 in Divisional Application No. 2015-83330”, Dec. 14, 2015, 3 pages. |
JP2015-83330 , “Japanese Office Action of Nov. 1, 2016 in Divisional Application No. 2015-83330”, Nov. 1, 2016, 4 pages. |
JP2015-83330 , “Japanese Response to Office Action filed May 1, 2017 in Divisional Application No. 2015-83330”, May 1, 2017, 206 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240066439 A1 | Feb 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61106467 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12581686 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 17967052 | US |