The present invention relates to a method of reinforcing a plastic pallet, and more particularly to a method of reinforcing a plastic pallet by applying a plurality of sheet strips along relatively weak structural portions of the pallet to form a plurality of substantially rectangular hollow vertical cross-sections along the length of the relatively weak structural portions for improved stiffness.
Replacing wood pallets with plastic pallets has been a goal for many years. The advantages of the plastic pallets are many as compared to wood, including greater durability, lighter weight, more consistent dimensions, improved cleanliness, water resistance, higher residual value for recycling, and no nails which may damage products being supported thereon.
One major hurdle to overcome with plastic is the cost. Plastic pallets are more expensive than wood by three to five times. This cost can be offset by the number of trips or shipments that can be achieved with plastic versus wood pallets. Another major hurdle is the stiffness of plastic pallets. Racking loaded pallets in warehouses for up to 30 days is common, and the combination of low tensile strength and creep limit the use of plastic.
There are three conventional methods of overcoming these weaknesses. The first is to add reinforcement such as steel or a composite to the pallet. This generally adds significant cost and weight and complicates recycling of the pallet. The second is to make the pallet taller. This limits the height of product to be stacked on the pallet. The third is to use reinforced or engineered resins. Again, this adds significant cost and weight. All three obviously limit the acceptance of plastic pallets.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,580,190 provides a partial solution to the stiffness problem by attaching top and bottom sheets 22,24 to the structural network 23, as shown in
Further complicating the problem, modern pallets typically require large openings for receipt of pallet jacks. For example, the pallet shown in
Because pallets are exposed to significant abuse, any solution to the stiffness problem must not adversely effect the impact strength of the pallet.
Accordingly, a need exists for improving the stiffness of modern plastic pallets configured to receive a pallet jack, without reducing impact strength of the pallet.
The present invention provides a method of reinforcing a modern plastic pallet by affixing sheet strips along relatively weak structural portions of the pallet to form a plurality of substantially rectangular hollow vertical cross-sections along the length of the relatively weak structural portions for improved stiffness without loss of impact strength.
More specifically, the present invention provides a method of reinforcing a plastic pallet having a thin top deck portion, a plurality of support columns extending from the top deck portion and a plurality of support rails connected to the support columns to form a thin bottom deck portion, wherein the support rails each include a sheet portion with a plurality of vertical ribs extending therefrom. The method includes the step of welding a plurality of plastic sheets to the vertical ribs between the support columns to form a plurality of substantially rectangular hollow vertical cross-sections along the length of the support rails for improved stiffness. It is contemplated that the substantially rectangular hollow vertical cross-sectional areas may be filled with a secondary material, such as structural foam for improved structural integrity.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method of structurally reinforcing a modern plastic pallet configured to receive a pallet jack, in a manner which improves stiffness without loss of impact strength.
The above object and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
In a racking scenario, the modern plastic pallet 10 (which is configured to receive a pallet jack from any side), shown in
Using simple beam formulas it is known that the deflection increases as the load or the span distance increases and decreases as the material modulus (E) or section moment of inertia (I) increases. Since the load and the span are defined for a given application, the variables used to minimize deflection are the material and the section design.
A good rule of thumb with plastics is that as the E value increases for a given material, the impact strength decreases. There are engineered materials that can solve these problems but they are too expensive for wide spread use. The most common method is to use a commodity resin such as polyethylene or polypropylene and add a filler to stiffen the resin. Fillers add weight and reduce impact strength for a given material as well as impact the recyclability in some cases. They also add cost, which can be the biggest problem to overcome. So, the ideal pallet would use a commodity resin because of cost, weight, and impact strength. Accordingly, optimizing the design of the pallet is the preferred method to achieve improved pallet performance.
As mentioned above, deflection decreases as the section moment of inertia (I) increases. For a pallet, the easiest method to increase stiffness is to increase height. However, in practice there is a maximum allowable height for pallets, and existing pallets are generally designed at this maximum value. Accordingly, the only alternative is to maximize the moment of inertia for each pallet component, namely the top deck 16 and bottom deck support rails 20.
For a given section geometry, the highest I value is for a solid section. For instance, the stiffest top deck design is one that is a solid plastic. Obviously, this is impractical because of weight and cost. Most designs attempt to overcome this by using ribbed sections instead of solid sections to minimize the loss of I and reduce the weight to an acceptable level. Another method is to use foaming agents along with the ribs to minimize the weight of the ribs and improve the I value. Both methods have a limit to their effectiveness. Namely, ribs are not the ideal geometry to maximize the I value, and while foaming improves this slightly, it also reduces the impact strength of the material.
It is known that for a given section the material closest to the neutral axis has the least effect on the I value, and the material farthest away has the greatest effect. In other words, a hollow or I-beam section is stiffer than a rectangular section of equal height and area. Therefore, the object of the design is to create hollow or boxed sections everywhere possible. Conventional injection molding techniques make this almost impossible to create, but by using a simple secondary operation, we are able to make a boxed top deck 16 and bottom deck 19.
A pallet in accordance with the present invention includes the top deck portion 16, which is injection molded conventionally and consists of a flat upper surface 22 with a series of ribs 24 protruding from the upper surface 22 as shown in
The bottom deck 19 is constructed similarly but has the support columns 18 integrally molded therewith. Ribs 30 protrude downwardly from the sheet portions 32 of the support rails 20, and a plurality of plastic sheet strips 34 are welded to the ends of the ribs 30 to form a plurality of boxed cross-sections along the length of the rails 20 between the columns 18. The top and bottom decks 16,19 may be joined permanently by welding, or can be snapped together as commonly known in the art.
The method described above is preferably used to stiffen conventional ribbed pallet designs. The small sheets of plastic 34 are welded into critical deflection areas of the existing pallets for stiffening. Also, new pallets could be designed to accept the sheets for applications that require racking, and would eliminate the sheets for lighter, lower cost applications. For example, the ribs 30 may be recessed in order to receive the sheets 34 in a position flush with the bottom surface of the support rails 20.
The method described above is particularly applicable for use in pallets such as that shown in
Referring to
The pallet shown in
It is contemplated that good results could be achieved even by only welding the peripheral ribs to the plastic sheet strips. It is further contemplated that the plastic sheet strips need not be welded, but could be affixed in any manner, such as adhesive, etc. It is also contemplated that the sheet strips need not be plastic.
Referring to
While the best mode for carrying out the invention has been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/891,949 filed Jun. 25, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,990 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/108,532 filed Jul. 1, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,234.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1910781 | Way | May 1933 | A |
2544657 | Cushman | Mar 1951 | A |
2699912 | Cushman | Jan 1955 | A |
2828933 | De Pew et al. | Apr 1958 | A |
2991965 | Drieborg | Jul 1961 | A |
3126843 | De Laney | Mar 1964 | A |
3152693 | Anderson | Oct 1964 | A |
3187689 | Hess | Jun 1965 | A |
3307504 | Cloyd et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3424110 | Toot | Jan 1969 | A |
3467032 | Rowlands et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3481285 | Yellin | Dec 1969 | A |
3580190 | Fowler | May 1971 | A |
3602157 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3603272 | Ditges | Sep 1971 | A |
3606844 | Lubker et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3613605 | Holdredge, Jr. | Oct 1971 | A |
3638586 | Elshout | Feb 1972 | A |
3640229 | Bell | Feb 1972 | A |
3651769 | Foley | Mar 1972 | A |
3654874 | Skinner | Apr 1972 | A |
3664271 | Wolder et al. | May 1972 | A |
3667403 | Angelbeck, Jr. | Jun 1972 | A |
3675595 | Sullivan | Jul 1972 | A |
3678868 | Hirota | Jul 1972 | A |
3680495 | Pike | Aug 1972 | A |
3680496 | Westlake, Jr. | Aug 1972 | A |
3683821 | Mangold | Aug 1972 | A |
3685461 | Belcher | Aug 1972 | A |
3699901 | Cook, III | Oct 1972 | A |
3699902 | Allgeyer et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3710733 | Story | Jan 1973 | A |
3720176 | Munroe | Mar 1973 | A |
3759194 | Fujii et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3795206 | Utz | Mar 1974 | A |
D231096 | Adam | Apr 1974 | S |
3814031 | Fowler | Jun 1974 | A |
D232019 | Rehrig et al. | Jul 1974 | S |
3824933 | Lind | Jul 1974 | A |
3835792 | Wharton | Sep 1974 | A |
3861326 | Brown | Jan 1975 | A |
3868915 | Hafner | Mar 1975 | A |
3878796 | Morrison | Apr 1975 | A |
3916803 | Garcia | Nov 1975 | A |
3917066 | Cloyd | Nov 1975 | A |
3938448 | Nishitani et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3964400 | Brand | Jun 1976 | A |
3994241 | Evans | Nov 1976 | A |
4002126 | Bell et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4013021 | Steinlein et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4051787 | Nishitani et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
D246296 | Fujii et al. | Nov 1977 | S |
4103857 | Levenhagen | Aug 1978 | A |
4133270 | Ravera | Jan 1979 | A |
4146205 | Skinner | Mar 1979 | A |
4183491 | Sanders et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4220100 | Palomo et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4287836 | Aoki | Sep 1981 | A |
4316419 | Cupido | Feb 1982 | A |
4403555 | Forrest | Sep 1983 | A |
4597338 | Kreeger | Jul 1986 | A |
4606278 | Shuert | Aug 1986 | A |
RE32344 | Wind | Feb 1987 | E |
4735154 | Hemery | Apr 1988 | A |
4742781 | Shuert | May 1988 | A |
4799433 | Luft | Jan 1989 | A |
4843976 | Pigott et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4869456 | Jacobs | Sep 1989 | A |
4951821 | Kempkes | Aug 1990 | A |
4972782 | Shepherd et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4998619 | Sowa et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5042396 | Shuert | Aug 1991 | A |
5046434 | Breezer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5097951 | Pigott et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117762 | Shuert | Jun 1992 | A |
5154286 | Gits | Oct 1992 | A |
5160029 | Pigott et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197395 | Pigott et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5205221 | Melin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
D346681 | Pigott et al. | May 1994 | S |
D347511 | Pigott et al. | May 1994 | S |
5337681 | Schrage | Aug 1994 | A |
5343814 | Pigott et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
D354606 | Pigott et al. | Jan 1995 | S |
5391251 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5401347 | Shuert | Mar 1995 | A |
5404829 | Shuert | Apr 1995 | A |
5413052 | Breezer et al. | May 1995 | A |
D364030 | Pigott et al. | Nov 1995 | S |
5470641 | Shuert | Nov 1995 | A |
5520121 | Schubart et al. | May 1996 | A |
D370763 | Pigott et al. | Jun 1996 | S |
D371882 | Kristoffersson | Jul 1996 | S |
D372192 | Pigott et al. | Jul 1996 | S |
5549056 | Jordan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555820 | Shuert | Sep 1996 | A |
5566624 | Brown et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579686 | Pigott et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
D378458 | Pigott et al. | Mar 1997 | S |
5638760 | Jordan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5666886 | Alexander et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676064 | Shuert | Oct 1997 | A |
5736221 | Hardigg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755162 | Knight et al. | May 1998 | A |
5778801 | Delacour | Jul 1998 | A |
D398731 | Pigott et al. | Sep 1998 | S |
D398732 | Pigott et al. | Sep 1998 | S |
5806436 | Weichenrieder, Sr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836255 | Uitz | Nov 1998 | A |
5845588 | Gronnevik | Dec 1998 | A |
5868080 | Wyler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5894803 | Kuga | Apr 1999 | A |
5950546 | Brown et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967057 | Nakayama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6125770 | Brandenburg | Oct 2000 | A |
6199488 | Favaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6250234 | Apps | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283044 | Apps | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6354230 | Maschio | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357366 | Frankenberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389990 | Apps | May 2002 | B1 |
6446563 | Ohanesian | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 232 200 | Jan 1973 | DE |
26 13 083 | Oct 1977 | DE |
27 33 457 | Feb 1979 | DE |
3205910 | Nov 1983 | DE |
3205910 | Nov 1983 | DE |
38 06 097 | Sep 1989 | DE |
196 51 999 | Jun 1998 | DE |
166485 | Jul 1921 | EP |
1310898 | Mar 1973 | EP |
0 226 505 | Jun 1986 | EP |
0202203 | Nov 1986 | EP |
0301445 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 754 540 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 849 184 | May 1998 | EP |
2 274 512 | Aug 1974 | FR |
2 259 023 | Jan 1975 | FR |
2 486 029 | Jul 1980 | FR |
2 715 127 | Jul 1995 | FR |
9303243 | Mar 1994 | HU |
9900326 | May 1999 | HU |
53 058581 | May 1978 | JP |
06-179448 | Jun 1994 | JP |
09 202327 | Aug 1997 | JP |
701 869 | Dec 1979 | RU |
WO 9001448 | Feb 1990 | WO |
WO 9408861 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 94 10051 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 94 11262 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9709239 | Mar 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020134284 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09891949 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10150916 | US | |
Parent | 09108532 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 09891949 | US |