This invention relates to a method of removing a biofilm from a surface. More particularly, this invention relates to a method of removing a biofilm from a catheter.
Almost all micro-organisms subsist in elaborate colonies that are embedded in biofilms of self-produced exopolymer matrices. The biofilm allows the micro-organisms to adhere to any surface, living or nonliving. The adaptive and genetic changes of the micro-organisms within the biofilm make them resistant to all known antimicrobial agents. Thus, the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies used to fight acute infections are not effective in eradicating medical device biofilm-related infections or chronic biofilm diseases. Today, vascular catheter-related bloodstream infections are the most serious and costly healthcare-associated infections.
Catheter-related bloodstream infection originates from biofilm formation on either extra- or intra-luminal surfaces of the catheter. Microbial points of entry are the skin (extra-luminal) and any access port or disconnection site of the administration system.
The disinfection of access sites is a preventative intervention for microbial entry to the intra-luminal catheter surface. Currently, an alcohol (I.P.A.) prep pad is used in clinical practice for this purpose although no standard applies to address the optimal antiseptic, method of application or duration of application. The surfaces of the access ports and needle less connectors are highly variable in configuration.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to disinfect the surface of any type of access system prior to entry.
It is another object of the invention to substantially remove a biofilm from a surface and particularly the surfaces of a female luer or similar catheters.
Briefly, the invention provides a method of removing a biofilm from a surface comprising the steps of providing a substrate characterized in having a roughness sufficient to scrape a biofilm on a surface, a plurality of cavities or pores for capturing scrapings of biofilm and an antibacterial disinfectant therein; and moving the substrate across the surface having a biofilm thereon for a number of times sufficient to substantially remove the biofilm.
During the times that the substrate is moved across the biofilm-containing surface, a pressure is applied to facilitate the scrubbing action of the substrate on the biofilm.
The substrate is particularly useful on catheters, such as female luers, that have surfaces that can become the site for the growth of bacteria and, in particular, the growth of a biofilm.
The substrate that is preferably used is a semi-closed hydrophilic polyurethane medical grade foam.
In one embodiment, use is made of a scrub brush as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,065,773, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. In this respect, the scrub brush includes a housing that defines a cavity, a swab of foam material disposed in the cavity and an anti-bacterial disinfectant in the swab. In addition, a lid is removably mounted on the housing for sealing over the cavity in order to maintain the cavity and swab therein in a sterile condition until ready for use.
In accordance with the invention, the scrub brush is placed concentrically over the outer surface of a female luer with the swab compressed circumferentially between the housing and the luer in order to effect a full contact of the swab with the outer surface. Thereafter, the scrub brush is rotated relative to the outer surface of the female luer for a time sufficient to substantially remove the biofilm on the outer surface.
Experiments have shown that for a female luer of conventional size, the number of rotations of the scrub brush relative to the female luer is in the range of from 6 to 10 rotations and, preferably, 8 rotations in order to substantially remove the biofilm.
It is understood that the action of the scrub brush is such as to effectively remove bacteria on the surface of a biofilm and, upon subsequent rotations, to scrape into the biofilm thereby removing scrapings of the biofilm into the cavities (pores) of the swab. Upon completion of the number of rotations, substantially all of the biofilm is scraped off the luer surface contacted by the swab and held within the cavities (pores) of the swab.
After the swab has been rotated on the female luer, the swab may be slid off the female luer and discarded.
In an embodiment in which the swab of a scrub brush includes an annular portion for enveloping the outer surface of a female luer and an inner central portion for insertion within the central passage of the female luer, a similar method is carried out as described above. In this case, the scrub brush is again placed concentrically over the outer surface of the female lure with the annular portion compressed circumferentially between the housing of the scrub brush and the luer to effect a full contact of the swab with the outer surface while the central portion of the swab is compressed within the central passage of the female luer. After a sufficient number of rotations have been effected to remove or substantially remove the biofilm, the scrub brush can be removed from the female luer and discarded.
Where the female luer has an external thread, the scrub brush is threaded onto the outer surface and conforms to the shape of the external thread in order to contact the surfaces thereof. In this way, all the nooks and crannies on the outer surface of the female luer can be scrubbed by the swab.
Use may be also be made of a microbial scrub brush that has a pair of cavities on opposite sides of a housing with each cavity housing a swab of foam material with an antibacterial disinfectant therein. As above, a lid is removably mounted on the housing for sealing over each respective cavity in order to maintain the cavity and swab therein in a sterile condition until ready for use.
This embodiment is particularly useful in removing multiple layers of biofilm from a female luer that has been in use for an extended period of time. In such cases, it has been known that multiple layers will build up on the surfaces of the female luer.
The use of the multi-cavity housing allows the user to apply one of the swabs to the female luer to remove at least some of the biofilm layers followed by use of the second swab to remove the remaining layers of biofilm.
One advantage of the multi-cavity scrub brush is that the swabs may be made of different compositions. For example, one swab may be a low density hydrophilic polyurethane medical grade foam of high porosity while the other swab is a medium density hydrophilic polyurethane medical grade foam of low porosity. Further, one swab may be provided with a higher concentration of disinfectant than the other swab. Using the swab with the greater roughness first allows most of the biofilm layers to be removed. Follow-up swabbing with the less rough swab should result in the removal of the remaining biofilm layer or layers.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to
Referring to
The swab 13 includes an annular portion 14 for enveloping an outer surface of a female luer 15 (see
The swab 13 is a substrate characterized in having a roughness sufficient to scrape a biofilm on a surface and a plurality of cavities (pores) for capturing scrapings of biofilm therein. By way of example, the foam material may be a low to medium to density foam having a density of up to 5 pounds per cubic foot with an average core size of 0.013 inch.
The antibacterial disinfectant which is employed may be any suitable solution, such as, an aqueous solution containing from 2% to 5% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and, in particular, a 3.15% CHG Solution, a 4% CHG Solution and a 5% CHG Solution.
Referring to
Referring to
During rotation of the scrub brush 13 on the female luer 15, a scrubbing action takes place under compression. During the first turns of the scrub brush 13, the layer of bacteria 19 on top of the biofilm is removed. Subsequent turning of the scrub brush 13 scrapes into and removes the biofilm 17. The final turns of the scrub brush 13 remove the layer of bacteria 18 located below the now removed biofilm 17.
The combination of the roughness and the compression of the foam material of the swab 13 serves to scrape the biofilm 17 along the edges of the pores or cavities of the foam while capturing the scrapings in the pores or cavities of the foam.
Where the luer 15 has an external thread, or an internal thread, the compression of the foam material of the swab 13 serves to insure a full contact of the swab 13 with the surfaces to be rendered antiseptic. Thus, the foam material yields to conform to the threaded surfaces to be cleaned so that all nooks and crannies can be swabbed.
As indicated in
Referring to
The swab 13 on one side of the housing 11′ is made of a different porosity than the swab 13′ on the opposite side of the housing 11′.
For example, the swab 13 is a semi-closed low density hydrophilic polyurethane medical grade foam of high porosity while the oppositely disposed 13′ is a semi-closed medium density hydrophilic polyurethane medical grade foam of low porosity. The high porosity swab 13 would be used initially as a rough grain sandpaper to remove “chunks” of built-up biofilm layers and the lower porosity swab 13 used thereafter as a fine grain sandpaper to remove any remaining biofilm.
Further, the swab 13 may contain a different concentration of disinfectant from the other swab 13′. For example, the swab 13 may have a higher concentration of chlohexidine gluconate than the other swab 13′.
When placed into use, the lid 20 on one side of the scrub brush 10′ is removed to expose the swab 13. The scrub brush 10′ is then placed concentrically over the outer surface of a female luer in a manner as described above with respect to
By using a swab with a greater roughness, several layers of biofilm may be removed from the female luer. Following with a swab that is less rough, serves to remove any remaining layer or layers of biofilm. In this respect, if only one swab were used, there is a risk that the one swab would become saturated with scraped off biofilm and would not remove all the biofilm layers from the female luer. The use of the second swab reduces this risk.
The invention thus provides a method of removing biofilm from a female luer and like catheters.
Further, the invention provides a method of reducing the risk of catheter-related blood stream infections originating from biofilm formation.
The invention further provides a method that is able to disinfect the surface of any type of access system prior to entry.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2878128 | Jorgenson | Mar 1959 | A |
3396727 | Mount | Aug 1968 | A |
3450129 | Brewer | Jun 1969 | A |
3860348 | Doyle | Jan 1975 | A |
3915806 | Horlach | Oct 1975 | A |
3961629 | Richter et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4326569 | Vaillancourt | Apr 1982 | A |
4340052 | Dennehey et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4354490 | Rogers | Oct 1982 | A |
4375849 | Hanifl | Mar 1983 | A |
4407429 | Hekal | Oct 1983 | A |
4417890 | Dennehey et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4432259 | Werth, Jr. | Feb 1984 | A |
4432764 | Lopez | Feb 1984 | A |
4440207 | Genatempo et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4453636 | Meadows et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4465200 | Percarpio | Aug 1984 | A |
4484595 | Vanek et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4513888 | Curry | Apr 1985 | A |
4551146 | Rogers | Nov 1985 | A |
4624664 | Peluso et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4734950 | Schenke et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752983 | Grieshaber | Jun 1988 | A |
4778447 | Velde et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4801029 | Begley | Jan 1989 | A |
4830674 | Kaufman | May 1989 | A |
4847597 | Dobosi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862549 | Criswell | Sep 1989 | A |
4867309 | Germain | Sep 1989 | A |
4872135 | Peterson et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4872235 | Nielsen | Oct 1989 | A |
4886388 | Gulker et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4893956 | Wojcik et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4919837 | Gluck | Apr 1990 | A |
4981230 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4989733 | Patry | Feb 1991 | A |
5049139 | Gilchrist | Sep 1991 | A |
5180061 | Khan et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5193525 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195957 | Tollini | Mar 1993 | A |
5203771 | Melker et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5242425 | White et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5274874 | Cercone et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5308406 | Wallock et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330235 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332113 | Kusler, III et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5368049 | Raman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372429 | Beaver, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382297 | Valentine et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5471706 | Wallock et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5531341 | Shlisky | Jul 1996 | A |
5536258 | Folden | Jul 1996 | A |
5554135 | Menyhay | Sep 1996 | A |
5566823 | Summers | Oct 1996 | A |
5613521 | Knapp | Mar 1997 | A |
5620427 | Werschmidt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5673722 | Brass | Oct 1997 | A |
5694978 | Heilmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719113 | Fendler et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722537 | Sigler | Mar 1998 | A |
5743892 | Loh et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763412 | Khan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776430 | Osborne et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782808 | Folden | Jul 1998 | A |
5792120 | Menyhay | Aug 1998 | A |
5829976 | Green | Nov 1998 | A |
5830488 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5894015 | Rechtin | Apr 1999 | A |
5906808 | Osborne et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913630 | Kelders et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5954957 | Chin-Loy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980925 | Jampani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000580 | Nilson | Dec 1999 | A |
6027492 | Vetter | Feb 2000 | A |
6045539 | Menyhay | Apr 2000 | A |
6045623 | Cannon | Apr 2000 | A |
6047431 | Canonica | Apr 2000 | A |
6086275 | King | Jul 2000 | A |
6096701 | Mondin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108847 | Cueman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110292 | Jewett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116468 | Nilson | Sep 2000 | A |
6130196 | Mondin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143025 | Stobie et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152913 | Feith et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6245056 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250315 | Ernster | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254550 | McNamara et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289547 | Narula et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299520 | Cheyne, III | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6357947 | Mark | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387865 | Mondin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387866 | Mondin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395697 | Cheung et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432213 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447446 | Smith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472356 | Narula et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488942 | Ingemann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508601 | Lui et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508602 | Gruenbacher et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6564415 | Katakura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6589212 | Navis | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6617294 | Narula et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6669387 | Gruenbacher et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699233 | Slanda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708363 | Larsen | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726386 | Gruenbacher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6745425 | Tope | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6821043 | Teh | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824015 | Ammann | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6855678 | Whiteley | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6911025 | Miyahara | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6991527 | Linzell | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021848 | Gruenbacher et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7083605 | Miyahara | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108440 | Gruenbacher et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7144172 | Zhadanov et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163914 | Gluck et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179007 | Wong et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199090 | Koivisto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7282177 | Castaneda | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282186 | Lake, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7338927 | Shapiro | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347458 | Rome et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7452349 | Miyahara | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7488757 | Hoang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513957 | Condliff | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537779 | Modak et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
D596308 | Fisher | Jul 2009 | S |
7560422 | Shapiro | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D607325 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2010 | S |
7682561 | Davis et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704002 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7763006 | Tennican | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7794675 | Lynn | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799010 | Tennican | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828777 | Vetter et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7834328 | Redmond et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857793 | Raulerson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7922701 | Buchman | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931877 | Steffens et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7972322 | Tennican | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7993309 | Schweikert | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015653 | Bargiel et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8065773 | Vaillancourt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069523 | Vaillancourt et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8336151 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8336152 | Vaillancourt et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010031221 | Wu et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031721 | Webb et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032659 | Wang et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020002984 | Loy | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022660 | Jampani et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020062147 | Yang | May 2002 | A1 |
20030019767 | Cabrera | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030144647 | Miyahara | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147925 | Sawan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156884 | Teh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164175 | Linzell | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030211066 | Scholz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213501 | Thomson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217423 | Larsen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233074 | Shields | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019990 | Farrell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052831 | Modak et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111078 | Miyahara | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040214785 | Dees et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230162 | Tan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237235 | Visioli et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258560 | Lake et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050081888 | Pung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050124970 | Kunin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142945 | Mejlhede et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147524 | Bousquet | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171489 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177964 | Cisneros | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201812 | Wong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214185 | Castaneda | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215461 | Gluck et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222542 | Burkholz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050241088 | Brunner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050241089 | Brunner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050282727 | Shapiro | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003082 | Marumo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030827 | Raulerson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048313 | Yamaki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102200 | Esquenet et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060189961 | Miyahara | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060281663 | Asmus | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033753 | Kritzler | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065388 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093762 | Utterberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106205 | Connell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112333 | Hoang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130707 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157408 | Bargiel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176117 | Redmond et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225660 | Lynn | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070266509 | Kohlruss et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277852 | Condliff | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282280 | Tennican | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080011310 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014224 | Boyd et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019889 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033371 | Updegraff et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034515 | Hilscher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038167 | Lynn | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039803 | Lynn | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080086091 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098543 | Esquenet et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103210 | Shapiro | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132880 | Buchman | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137969 | Rueckert et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080138438 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147047 | Davis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152894 | Beihoffer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155769 | Schonewille et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172007 | Bousquet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177250 | Howlett et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187460 | Utterberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194994 | Bown et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080235888 | Vaillancourt et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090008393 | Howlett et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028750 | Ryan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041619 | Cady et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062766 | Howlett et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099529 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090104281 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090117164 | Toreki et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090126134 | Whipple et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137969 | Colantonio et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143470 | Hoang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162301 | Tarrand | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165228 | Kilkenny et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175759 | Davis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187148 | Knight | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191249 | Adelakun | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090205151 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226241 | McEwen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090297400 | Cady et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000040 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100047123 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049170 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050351 | Colantonio et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100083452 | Vaillancourt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100200017 | Kerr et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100242993 | Hoang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110030726 | Vaillancourt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110039764 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110039765 | Connor | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044850 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046563 | Vetter et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054440 | Lewis | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110125104 | Lynn | May 2011 | A1 |
20110154591 | Ernster | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110213339 | Bak | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213341 | Solomon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110217212 | Solomon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110265834 | Tennican | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284024 | Trebella et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110290799 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000487 | Esquenet et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016318 | Hoang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1829551 | Sep 2006 | CN |
102448502 | May 2012 | CN |
103 35 794 | Oct 2005 | DE |
10 2005 027 982 | Dec 2006 | DE |
1977714 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2467217 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2003 319825 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2008094915 | Apr 2008 | JP |
5108591 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013502317 | Jan 2013 | JP |
WO 9904623 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0015036 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2004018003 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004084973 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2006019782 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006062846 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006138111 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007084908 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007097985 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007137056 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008100950 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009123709 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010039171 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011022601 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP08250832 filed Mar. 12, 2008 EP Search Report dated Aug. 15, 2008. |
PCT/US2009/002011 filed Mar. 30, 2009 Search Report dated Jun. 1, 2009. |
PCT/US2009/002011 filed Mar. 30, 2009 Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2009. |
PCT/US2009/005120 filed Sep. 14, 2009 Search Report dated Jul. 1, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/029641 filed Apr. 1, 2010 Search Report dated Jul. 1, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/029641 filed Apr. 1, 2010 Written Opinion dated Jul. 1, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,740, filed Sep. 11, 2009 Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/832,437, filed Jul. 21, 2006 entitled Disinfecting Cap. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/850,438, filed Oct. 10, 2006 entitled Disinfecting Cap. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/195,002, filed Oct. 2, 2008 entitled Site Scrub Brush. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/281,711, filed Nov. 17, 2005 Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,805, filed Feb. 12, 2007 Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 22, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/705,805, filed Feb. 12, 2007 Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 21, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/732,075, filed Apr. 2, 2007 Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/005120 filed Sep. 14, 2009 Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,740, filed Sep. 11, 2009 Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 21, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/732,075, filed Apr. 2, 2007 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 14, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/002011 filed Mar. 30, 2009 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 5, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/005120 filed Sep. 14, 2009 Written Opinion dated Jul. 1, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/046096 filed Aug. 20, 2010 Search Report dated Oct. 1, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/046096 filed Aug. 20, 2010 Written Opinion dated Oct. 1, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,740, filed Sep. 11, 2009 Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/732,075, filed Apr. 2, 2007 Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2011. |
JP 2008-094915 filed Apr. 1, 2008 Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
PCT/US11/37176 filed May 19, 2011 International Search Report dated Sep. 12, 2011. |
PCT/US11/37176 filed May 19, 2011 Written Opinion dated Sep. 12, 2011. |
PCT/US2010/046096 filed Aug. 20, 2010 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2012. |
JP 2008-094915 filed Apr. 1, 2008 Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,744, filed Apr. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated May 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/860,114, filed Aug. 20, 2010 Non-Final Office Action dated May 2, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/860,114, filed Aug. 20, 2010 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 23, 2012. |
CN 200980120104.3 filed Nov. 30, 2010 First Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2012. |
CN 200980138362.6 filed Apr. 2, 2011 First Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
MX/a/2011/010308 filed Sep. 29, 2011 First Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/691,273, filed Nov. 30, 2012 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090241991 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |