The field of this invention relates to techniques for repair of collapsed or otherwise damaged tubulars in a well.
At times, surrounding formation pressures can rise to a level to actually collapse well casing or tubulars. Other times, due to pressure differential between the formation and inside the casing or tubing, a collapse is also possible. Sometimes, on long horizontal runs, the formation surrounding the tubulars in the well can shift in such a manner as to kink or crimp the tubulars to a sufficient degree to impede production or the passage of tools downhole. Past techniques to resolve this issue have been less than satisfactory as some of them have a high chance of causing further damage, while other techniques were very time consuming, and therefore expensive for the well operator.
One way in the past to repair a collapsed tubular downhole was to run a series of swages to incrementally increase the opening size. These tools required a special jarring tool and took a long time to sufficiently open the bore in view of the small increments in size between one swage and the next. Each time a bigger swage was needed, a trip out of the hole was required. The nature of this equipment required that the initial swage be only a small increment of size above the collapsed hole diameter. The reason that small size increments were used was the limited available energy for driving the swage using the weight of the string in conjunction with known jarring tools. Tri-State Oil Tools, now a part of Baker Hughes Incorporated, sold casing swages of this type.
Also available from the same source were tapered mills having an exterior milling surface known as Superloy. These tapered mills were used to mill out collapsed casing, dents, and mashed in areas. Unfortunately, these tools were difficult to control with the result being an occasional unwanted penetration of the casing wall. In the same vein and having similar problems were dog leg reamers whose cutting structures not only removed the protruding segments but sometimes went further to penetrate the wall.
What is needed and is an object of the invention is a method and apparatus to allow repair of collapsed or bent casing or tubulars in a single trip using an expansion device capable of delivering the desired final internal dimension. The method features anchoring the device adjacent the target area, using a force multiplier to obtain the starting force for expansion, and stoking the swage as many times as necessary to complete the repair. These and other advantages of the present invention will become clearer to those skilled in the art from a review of the detailed description of the preferred embodiment and the claims below.
A method of repairing tubulars downhole is described. A swage is secured to a force magnification tool, which is, in turn, supported by an anchor tool. Applied pressure sets the anchor when the swage is properly positioned. The force magnification tool strokes the swage through the collapsed section. The anchor can be released and weight set down on the swage to permit multiple stroking to get through the collapsed area. The swage diameter can be varied.
a–1d show the anchor in the run in position;
a–2d show the anchor in the set position;
a–3e show the force magnification tool in the run in position;
a–5c are a sectional elevation view of the optional adjustable swage shown in the run in position;
a–6c are the view of
a–7c are the views of
Referring to
Located below the slips 40 is closure piston 56 having seals 58 and 60 and biased by spring 62. A passage 64 allows fluid to escape as spring 62 is compressed when the slips 40 are driven down by pressure in passage 34. Closure piston 56 is located in chamber 57 with ratchet piston 59. A ratchet plug 61 is biased by a spring 63 and has a passage 65 though it. A dog 67 holds a seal 69 in position against surface 71 of ratchet piston 59. A seal 73 seals between piston 59 and bottom sub 22. Area 75 on piston 59 is greater than area 77 on the opposite end of piston 59. In normal operation, the ratchet piston 59 does not move. It is only when the slips 40 refuse to release and rupture disc 20 is broken, then pressure drives up both pistons 56 and 59 to force the slips 40 to release and the ratchet teeth 79 and 81 engage to prevent downward movement of piston 56. Passage 65 allows fluid to be displaced more rapidly out of chamber 83 as piston 59 is being forced up.
Referring now to
The illustrated swage 134 is illustrated schematically and a variety of devices are attachable at thread 130 to allow the repair of a bent or collapsed tubular or casing 136 by an expansion technique.
The operation of the tool in the performance of the service will now be explained. The assembly of the anchor 10, the force magnifying tool 66 and the swage 134 are placed in position adjacent to where the casing or tubular is damaged. Pressure applied to passage 32 reaches piston 38, pushing it and slips 40 down with respect to body 16. Ramps 48 ride down ramps 50 pushing the slips 40 outwardly against the return force of band springs 44. Inserts 42 bite into the casing or tubing and eventually slips 40 hit their travel stop 52. Piston 56 is moved down against the bias of spring 62. The pressure continues to build up after the slips 40 are set, as shown in
Those skilled in the art can see that the force-magnifying tool 66 can be configured to have any number of pistons moving in tandem for achieving the desired pushing force on the swage 134. Optionally, the swage can be moved with no force magnification. The nature of the anchor device 10 can be varied and only the preferred embodiment is illustrated. The provision of an adjacent anchor to the section of casing or tubular being repaired facilitates the repair because reliance on surface manipulation of the string, when making such repairs is no longer necessary. Multiple trips are not required because sufficient force can be delivered to expand to the desired finished diameter with a swage such as 134. Even greater versatility is available if the swage diameter can be varied downhole. With this feature, if going to the maximum diameter in a single pass proves problematic, the diameter of the swage can be reduced to bring it through at a lesser diameter followed by a repetition of the process with the swage then adjusted to an incrementally larger diameter. Optionally the anchor 10 can also include centralizers 138 and 140. A single or multiple cones or other camming techniques can guide out the slips 40. Spring 63 can be a bowed snap ring or a coiled spring. Slips 40 can have inserts 42 or other types of surface treatment to promote grip into the casing or tubular.
Additional flexibility can be achieved by using flexible swage 138.
Segments 140 have a wide top 150 tapering down to a narrow bottom 152 with a high area 154, in between. Similarly, the oppositely oriented segments 142 have a wide bottom 156 tapering up to a narrow top 158 with a high area 160, in between. The high areas 154 and 160 are preferably identical so that they can be placed in alignment, as shown in
Segments 140 have a preferably T shaped member 166 engaged to ring 168. Ring 168 is connected to mandrel 144 at thread 170. During run in a shear pin 172 holds ring 168 to mandrel 144. Lower segments 142 are retained by T shaped members 174 to ring 176. Ring 176 is biased upwardly by piston 178. The biasing can be done in a variety of ways with a stack of Belleville washers 180 illustrated as one example. Piston 178 has seals 182 and 184 to allow pressure through opening 186 in the mandrel 144 to move up the piston 178 and pre-compress the washers 180. A lock ring 188 has teeth 190 to engage teeth 192 on the fixed swage 134, when the piston 178 is driven up. Thread 194 connects fixed swage 134 to mandrel 144. Opening 186 leads to cavity 196 for driving up piston 178. Preferably, high areas 154 and 160 do not extend out as far as the high area 198 of fixed swage 134 during the run in position shown in
The operation of the method using the flexible swage 138 will now be described. The assembly of the anchor 10, the force magnifying tool 66, the flexible swage 138 shown in the run in position of
When it is time to come out of the hole it will be desirable to offset the alignment of the high areas 154 and 160. When aligned, these high areas exceed the nominal inside diameter of the casing or tubing 133 by about 0.150 inches or more. To avoid having to pull under load to get out of the hole, the mandrel 144 can be turned to the right. This will shear the pin 172 as shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that swaging can be done going uphole rather than downhole; if the flexible swage 138 shown in
The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof, and various changes in the size, shape and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated construction, may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application is a divisional application claiming priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/359,759, filed on Feb. 6, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/356,061, filed on Feb. 11, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
556718 | Semmer | Mar 1896 | A |
1457139 | Bell et al. | May 1923 | A |
1794652 | Stone | Mar 1931 | A |
2187482 | Baker et al. | Jan 1940 | A |
2624409 | O'Neill | Jan 1953 | A |
2735497 | Brumleu et al. | Feb 1956 | A |
2877822 | Buck | Mar 1959 | A |
3002564 | Baker | Oct 1961 | A |
3011558 | Conrad | Dec 1961 | A |
3306361 | Lebourg | Feb 1967 | A |
3354969 | Ebeling | Nov 1967 | A |
3454092 | Page, Jr. | Jul 1969 | A |
3508610 | Kisling, III | Apr 1970 | A |
3664416 | Nicholas et al. | May 1972 | A |
3776307 | Young | Dec 1973 | A |
3785193 | Kinley et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
RE28449 | Edmond | Jun 1975 | E |
3948321 | Owen et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4059150 | Manderscheid | Nov 1977 | A |
4095655 | Still | Jun 1978 | A |
4311196 | Beall et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4436150 | Barker | Mar 1984 | A |
5141053 | Restarick et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5348095 | Worrall et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5366012 | Lohbeck | Nov 1994 | A |
5586601 | Pringle | Dec 1996 | A |
5623991 | Jani | Apr 1997 | A |
5667011 | Gill et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5785120 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794703 | Newman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5901789 | Donnelly et al. | May 1999 | A |
5960895 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012523 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021850 | Wood et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029748 | Forsyth et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6070671 | Cumming et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6241424 | Bath et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263966 | Haut et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315040 | Donnelly | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325148 | Trahan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6779600 | King et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0370591 | May 1990 | EP |
23461658 | Aug 2000 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050161213 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60356061 | Feb 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10359759 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 11087778 | US |