Spinal surgery methods and devices are disclosed for repairing damaged or deteriorated vertebrae at the lower lumbar levels, such as in the L5-S1 intervertebral space.
The vertebral column is the central pillar of the body. It is a generally flexible column that bears tensile and compressive loads, permits bending motions, and provides an attachment site for ribs, muscles and other structures. The vertebral column includes irregular bones called vertebrae that are separated by fibrocartilaginous structures known as intervertebral discs. There are seven vertebral, twelve thoracic, five lumbar, five sacral, and four coccygeal vertebrae. A typical vertebra consists of a rounded anterior body and a posterior vertebral arch that together form a protective structure around the vertebral canal that contains the spinal cord.
The intervertebral discs can be damaged or undergo degeneration, which often results in painful and sometimes debilitating nerve impingement syndromes. It is sometimes necessary to surgically replace the native disc with prosthetic disc implants to relieve the pain, restore the functional mechanics of the vertebral column, and promote fusion between adjacent vertebral bodies. Procedures such as total disc arthroplasty (disc replacement) have used a direct anterior approach orthogonal to the midline of the vertebral body, but such procedures require unfettered anterior spinal exposure for precise midline placement of the prosthetic disc. The major vascular structures that run along the anterior spine must be mobilized to achieve this exposure, which typically requires the assistance of a vascular surgeon. The procedure also causes significant surgical disruption of the anterior annular element around the disc.
Bertagnoli has described an anterolateral transpsoatic approach (ALPA) for implantation of prosthetic disc replacement devices. The patient is positioned in a supine position on the operating table, with the arms in abduction. The target disc level is localized through bi-planar fluoroscopy, and an inflatable bladder is placed beneath the level of interest to permit additional lordosis. An anterolateral incision is made on the left side for access to lumbar intervertebral spaces, while the incision is made on the right side for access to L5-S1. The fascia of the external oblique muscle is opened along the direction of its fibers and the muscle is split. The retroperitoneal space is entered and the peritoneal sac mobilized away from the overlying fascia to develop an operative pathway along the anterior aspect of the psoas muscle to the lateral aspect of the intervertebral space. The target zone for annulotomy is from the one o'clock to three o'clock position above the L5-S1 level, which leaves the anterior longitudinal ligament intact and avoids mobilizing the iliac vessels. At the L5-S1 level the target annulotomy zone is from the eight o'clock to ten o'clock position with mobilization of the iliac vessel toward the midline. Injury to the left iliac vessel is an unfortunate complication of such procedures. Additional information about anterolateral approaches to spinal surgery at the L4-L5 level is found in Bertognali et al, U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,216.
A minimally invasive procedure promoted by Nuvasive, Inc. uses a direct lateral, retroperitoneal approach to access the intervertebral discs above the L5-S1 level with minimal muscular disruption. The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position and the direct lateral incision is made in the axillary line. Another incision is made posterior to the lateral border of the erector spinae muscle, and finger dissection is conducted through this opening to the retroperitoneal space. The index finger of the surgeon sweeps the peritoneum anteriorly and palpates the psoas muscle. A dilator instrument is then introduced through the direct lateral incision and the index finger then guides the dilator instrument to the psoas muscle. The fibers of the psoas muscle are then split using blunt dissection and EMG monitoring to minimize damage to the nerves of the lumbar plexus that run through the posterior psoas muscle. A tissue distraction and tissue retraction assembly are then used to help establish an operative corridor to the direct lateral aspect of the intervertebral space at about the 3 o'clock position, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949. The direct lateral retroperitoneal approach to the L5-S1 space has not been possible because the anterior superior iliac spine obstructs a direct lateral approach to the L5-S1 intervertebral space. Hence approaches to the L5-S1 space typically use a standard anterior approach. For a laterally positioned patient, an extremely large sigmoidal incision has been required, with subsequent reflection of all the overlying musculature to expose the L5-S1 space.
It would therefore be useful to provide a minimally invasive approach to the L5-S1 space that minimizes injury to the blood vessels and nerves around the vertebral bodies. It would also be helpful to perform such a procedure in a manner that minimizes retroperitoneal scarring and damage to other body structures. Minimally invasive surgical approaches to the intervertebral spaces in the past have also been limited by the need to insert the prosthetic disc implant either into the front portion, posterior portion, or the side of the disc space to achieve stable placement of the prosthetic implant. It would therefore be useful to have a procedure that could avoid such a limitation at any vertebral level.
The inventor has found it is advantageous to provide a method, device and system that permit an angle between a disc implant and insertion instrument to be altered without removing the implant from the intervertebral space. This new surgical approach also removes the native disc contents from a generally lateral direction, which permits the peritoneal contents to fall out of the surgical field, while also taking advantage of the mechanics of anterior interbody surgery.
Disclosed methods, devices and systems are suitable for performing a minimally-invasive procedure for accessing the intervertebral space along an oblique pathway with an insertion instrument that holds a disc implant, and reorienting the angular relationship between instrument and implant while the implant is inside the body (for example at or within the disc space). In some disclosed embodiments, a prosthetic disc implant is inserted diagonally within the disc space, and the implant is then pivoted to a medial-lateral orientation within the disc space. The invention is particularly useful for accessing the L5-S1 intervertebral space along an anterolateral pathway to the anterior aspect of the spine, placing a prosthetic disc implant diagonally within the intervertebral space, and pivoting the implant within the disc space. However the method can also be used at other vertebral levels. In one embodiment, the oblique pathway has a caudal or cephalad-directed component, and the implant can be repositioned into a transverse anatomic plane through the intervertebral space.
In one embodiment, an implant is positioned in the intervertebral disc space of a laterally positioned subject by accessing the anterior face of the spinal disc intervertebral space, between the L5 and S1 vertebrae, from an anterolateral retroperitoneal approach. An oblique operative corridor is then established to the anterior face of the spinal disc space by introducing a retractor instrument anterolaterally to the spinal disc space, for example anterior to the anterior superior iliac spine, and in some instances between the level of the anterior superior iliac spine and the anterior inferior iliac spine. The spinal disc contents are removed from the intervertebral space through the operative corridor, and an elongated implant is introduced through the operative corridor into the intervertebral space diagonally (at an angle). The elongated implant is then pivoted within the intervertebral space to eventually position the implant substantially medial-laterally within the intervertebral space and achieve midline symmetric distribution of the mechanical load on the implant. The ability to pivot the implant within the intervertebral space permits the elongated implant to be generally aligned with the insertion instrument and advanced into the body through a relatively narrow operative corridor, then turned to its final position within the intervertebral space.
In a disclosed embodiment, the retractor instrument includes a proximal handle portion and a distal retractor blade portion that carries opposing ipsilateral and contralateral vascular retractor blades that are placed between the right and left iliac vessels and moved apart from one another to retract the right and left iliac vessels away from the anterior face of the spinal disc intervertebral space. A particular example of the retractor instrument has an ipsilateral arm on which the ipsilateral blade is mounted and a contralateral arm on which the contralateral blade is mounted. The retractor blades are placed between the right and left iliac vessels to move them away from one another to expose the anterior surface of the spine as the ipsilateral and contralateral arms of the retractor instrument move the retractor blades apart. For example, the blades of the retractor instrument are positioned at the anterior face of the vertebral body adjacent the anterior longitudinal ligament, and the retractor blades are spread to expose an area from about the 10 o'clock to 2 o'clock position of the vertebral body.
The elongated implant may be advanced into the intervertebral space through the operative corridor defined by the arms of the retractor instrument by securing the implant to a distal end of an elongated rigid introducer instrument and advancing the implant on the introducer instrument through the operative corridor to the anterior face of the intervertebral space at an oblique angle so that the implant enters the disc space diagonally. The angle between the implant and the introducer is then selectively changed to pivot the implant in one or more subsequent steps into the medial-lateral position for symmetric midline placement within the intervertebral space. In some embodiments the introducer instrument has a distal docking element that selectively docks with an interface element of the implant in a series of preselected positions to alter the angle between the implant and the introducer instrument. For example, the docking element is a plurality of docking pins on the tip of the introducer element, and the interface element is a corresponding series of docking holes that cooperatively mate to hold the implant in preselected angular orientations to the introducer instrument.
In some disclosed embodiments, the implant is an elongated elastomeric member that has a top bearing face, a bottom bearing face, a front face, a rear face, an ipsilateral face and a contralateral face. The rear face of the implant may be substantially flat. The contralateral face of the implant may be rounded (particularly at its corners that adjoin the front and rear faces) to minimize trauma induced by advancing the implant diagonally into the intervertebral space at the oblique angle, and using the ipsilateral face to function as an impact hinge or pivot point as the implant is moved in one or more realignments from the oblique to medial-lateral orientation. The ipsilateral end of the implant may have a pivot axis and an interface element, such as multiple pairs of spaced docking holes arranged on a curved surface that extends partially circumferentially around the pivot axis. The selected pairs of spaced docking holes are positioned to mate with the docking element of the introducer instrument, such as a pair of docking pins that extend from a distal tip of the introducer instrument.
In some embodiments the implant tapers in height from its front face to rear face, and/or medially to laterally, and it may be a partially hollow member in which the top face and bottom face are substantially open and separated by an internal divider wall that extends from the front face to the rear face to form a contralateral and ipsilateral window though the implant to promote the growth of bone within the implant. In some disclosed embodiments, the implant is a slightly compressible member in which the front face is convex and the ipsilateral face includes the interface element that mates with the docking element. The external surfaces of the implant (such as the top and bottom faces of the implant) have protuberances that help frictionally engage the implant to adjoining vertebral bodies, and also promote bone growth into the implant. The protuberances may have a variety of shapes, such as grooves or corrugations, but a frustopyramidal protuberance is believed to be particularly suitable.
The retractor instrument may also take a variety of forms, but certain disclosed embodiments have an ipsilateral arm that is shorter than the contralateral arm. A retractor blade on the ipsilateral arm therefore extends a shorter distance from the handle than the retractor blade on the contralateral arm. This asymmetric arrangement permits the retractor instrument to be advanced diagonally through the body from an anterolateral entrance point through the abdominal wall to the anterior aspect of the vertebral body. Since the contralateral arm is longer than the ipsilateral arm, the retractor blades at the anterior vertebral body span the anterior face of the vertebral body, for example from the 10 o'clock to 2 o'clock positions. The retractor blades may be curved outwardly from a longitudinal axis of the retractor instrument to help minimize damage to the blood vessels as they are retracted. A thin shim with a tapered tip may be inserted into the intervertebral space and mounted to the ipsilateral blade to retain the instrument in its desired angular orientation and distract adjacent vertebral bodies (such as L5 and S1) apart from one another during the procedure. The shim curves inwardly into the disc space, toward the midline of the body, away from the ipsilateral retractor blade, and toward a longitudinal axis of the retractor instrument. The shim has a height sufficient to maintain the adjacent vertebral bodies spaced from one another while a trial spacer and subsequent disc implant are pivoted into place within the disc space. The present disclosure also includes a system for positioning an implant in an intervertebral space of a subject. In certain disclosed embodiments, the system includes the retractor instrument for establishing an operative corridor to the anterior face of the intervertebral space. The retractor instrument has a proximal handle portion and a distal retractor blade portion that includes opposing ipsilateral and contralateral arms that are movable toward and away from one another to define a portion of the operative corridor therebetween. In certain embodiments, the ipsilateral retractor blade is carried by the ipsilateral arm, and a contralateral vascular retractor blade is carried by the contralateral arm. The contralateral arm and blade are longer than the ipsilateral arm and blade so that the retractor instrument can be introduced at an oblique angle with the two retractor blades spaced apart on the anterior aspect of the vertebral body.
The system also includes the introducer instrument for advancing an elongated prosthetic spinal disc implant between the arms and blades of the retractor instrument to the intervertebral space at an oblique angle so that the implant enters the intervertebral space diagonally. The introducer instrument is capable of pivoting the implant in the intervertebral space, for example by connecting docking pins on a tip of the introducer instrument to different sets of corresponding docking holes on the implant. The docking pins selectively mate with the different sets of docking holes on the implant to maintain the implant at different fixed angles to the introducer instrument. By mating the docking pins with different docking holes, the implant can be pivoted within the intervertebral space to move it from its initial diagonal orientation to a medial-lateral orientation generally symmetric with respect to the axis of the vertebral column. In certain embodiments, the system also includes the implant which has a top bearing face, a bottom bearing face, a front face, a rear face, an ipsilateral face and a contralateral face. The implant's contralateral face may be rounded to minimize trauma induced by advancing the implant diagonally into the intervertebral space and pivoting it around a pivot axis within the intervertebral space. The implant has an interface element for coupling with the introducer instrument and pivoting the implant within the disc space. For example, the interface element includes multiple pairs of spaced docking holes arranged on a curved surface that extends partially circumferentially around the pivot axis, and selected pairs of spaced docking holes are positioned to mate with the docking element of the introducer instrument. In certain disclosed embodiments, the implant tapers in height from the front face to the rear face. The implant may also be a partially hollow member in which the top face and bottom face are substantially open and may be separated by an internal divider wall that extends from the front face to the rear face to define the ipsilateral and contralateral windows therebetween for promoting tissue growth within the implant.
Another aspect of the invention is the prosthetic implant itself, the retractor itself, and the introducer element itself.
Advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art with the benefit of the following detailed description of embodiments and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. The drawings may not be to scale. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but to the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
It is to be understood the present invention is not limited to particular devices or methods, which may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include singular and plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Furthermore, the word “may” is used throughout this application in a permissive sense (i.e., having the potential to, being able to), not in a mandatory sense (i.e., must). The term “include,” and derivations thereof, mean “including, but not limited to.” The term “coupled” means directly or indirectly connected.
Embodiments of the invention are disclosed herein for accessing an intervertebral space, such as the L5-S1 space, and implanting a prosthetic disc implant within that space. The disclosed devices, methods and systems are suitable for use in a minimally invasive procedure for repairing degenerated or otherwise injured intervertebral discs.
The method generally includes initially accessing the intervertebral space using a retroperitoneal lateral approach. Then, with a finger-directed dilator or other suitable instrument, the distal retroperitoneum is swept anteriorly to expose an eventual channel to a direct approach to L5-S1. In most people, the direct approach to L5-S1 is anterior to the anterior superior iliac spine, or between the anterior superior iliac spine and the anterior inferior iliac spine. An incision is then made to open this channel, and blunt dilators are directed in an oblique direction directly to the mid-anterior aspect of L5-S1, for example between the 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock position. Fluoroscopic guidance may be used in accordance with known techniques to assist in advancing and positioning the dilators.
A retractor is then advanced over the dilators. In certain embodiments, the blades of the retractor are translucent so that the retracted contents can be seen through the blades. In contrast to existing retractors used in minimally invasive spinal surgery, the blades are shaped so that the curvature of the retractor blades conforms to the unique shape of the anatomy for the approach described herein, and is particularly suitable for use in this portion of the spine. For example, the ipsilateral blade may be shorter than the contralateral blade, and the ipsilateral blade may be more arcuate with a steeper curve as compared to the less curved, straighter contralateral blade. In one embodiment, the blades can accommodate a xenon light source for visualization in the cavity.
Once the retraction blades are advanced to the anterior aspect of the spine (for example between the 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock positions at the L5-S1 intervertebral space), the retractor blades are positioned below the iliac bifurcation between the right and left iliac vessels. The retractor blades are moved apart to increase exposure of the anterior vertebral column. A docking shim that is angled away from the ipsilateral blade and toward the disk space is placed in the intervertebral space to secure the retractor in position and maintain distraction of the vertebral bodies. If the small middle sacral artery is viewable in the midline, the surgeon may choose to ligate or electrocauterize this small vessel.
The procedure provides a relatively large window within which a discectomy and reconstruction can be carried out. The tools used for the discectomy may be slightly angled (relative to tools used for existing techniques) to maximize disc removal from an oblique direction. Trial spacers and final disc implants have a unique design suited to the trajectory of the implantation, as described in greater detail below. Radiopaque markers may be included on the trial spacers and implants (for example at its corners) to enable the structures to be visualized under fluoroscopy.
One or more trial spacers are then introduced into the evacuated disc space to help select an appropriate size implant. During introduction of the trial spacer or final implant, the initial insertion trajectory is oblique, resulting in diagonal entry of the trial spacer into disc space with impaction of the contralateral face of the implant or trial spacer to the far lateral aspect of the apophyseal rings (for example of L5-S1). The angle of impaction is then reoriented so that the portion of the trial spacer or implant that is present in the more anterior portion of the intervertebral space is impacted posteriorly on the apophyseal ring by using the contralateral side as a swivel point. Under fluoroscopic control, final seating of the implant or trial spacer is achieved. Once the final implant is in place, retraction is slowly released by allowing the retraction blades to move toward one another to check for any residual bleeding. The retractor is then slowly removed so that the skin closure of the percutaneous incision can be carried out.
This general summary of the procedure is illustrated in more detail in the following sections of this specification.
As shown in
To clarify some of the terms in this specification, the anatomic planes of the body in the standard anatomical position are shown in
An “oblique plane” is any plane that is at an angle (not within or parallel) to any one of the coronal, median or transverse planes. Hence an operative corridor is “oblique” if it is an oblique plane. An oblique angle can lie in one of the illustrated coronal, median or transverse planes, be parallel to one or two of those planes, or be outside of (and not parallel) to all three of them. For instance, an oblique pathway P1 to an intervertebral space can extend in a transverse plane at a non-zero angle to the median plane. Alternatively, an oblique pathway P2 can extend at a non-zero angle to the transverse, coronal and median planes.
Additional pertinent anatomy at the anterior aspect of the spine is illustrated in
Additional pertinent perispinal anatomy is shown in
The surgeon palpates the subject to locate the position of the anterior superior iliac spine 32, and an initial incision 90 (
Progressively larger dilators (not shown) may be used to further establish the operative pathway. The dilators are labeled with depth markings to help assure insertion of the successive dilators to the appropriate depth. The dilators are introduced obliquely into the body along a diagonal pathway from incision 92 to the anterior aspect of the spine to enter the intervertebral space between the twelve o'clock and two o'clock positions. The particularly illustrated pathway is generally in a transverse plane at the level of L5-S1, but at an angle to (and between) the coronal and median planes (for example in the direction of the pathway P1 in
In the illustrated embodiment, one of more of the dilators is left in place to serve as a guide for insertion of a retractor instrument 110 (
A pair of angled extension members 117, 119 can extend from handle portion 112 to improve the access angle provided by the retractor instrument. Conventional retraction instruments are not well suited for approaches that are not directly lateral to an implantation site. The increased distance from the handle to the blades and the change in angle provided by extension members 117, 119 improve access to the implantation sites for the methods described herein.
In particular, extension members 117, 119 can extend from handle portion 112 such that they are substantially parallel to one another and form an angle of between about 45 and 80 degrees from a plane formed by a surface of handle portion 112 to which extension members abut and from which extension members extend. As shown in
Arms 116, 118 and their respective retraction blades 120, 122 can be moved toward and away from one another by the movement of handles 124, 126, generally as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,949. Preferably, handles 124, 126 are coupled to a gear mechanism that converts the movement of the handles toward each other into linear movement of retraction arms 116, 118 away from one another to widen the distance between those arms without rotating them. The distance between handles 124, 126 can be adjusted and fixed by rotation of knobs 134, 136.
The retraction instrument 110 is placed in cannulated fashion over the dilators with the shorter ipsilateral arm/retraction blade on the ipsilateral side of the operative corridor. Retraction instrument 110 is slightly opened by moving handles 124, 126 toward one another so that opposing retraction arms 116, 118 move farther apart without rotation of the retraction arms. A standard xenon light source is carried by the instrument, and it is used for visualization of the anatomy at the distal tip of the instrument to position the retractor blades between the bifurcation of the right and left common iliac arteries and veins. The foot of ipsilateral blade 122 is placed beneath the ipsilateral vasculature (the right side for the approach illustrated in
According to one aspect of the invention, once satisfactory ipsilateral vascular retraction is achieved, a shim 132 (
Shim 132 is an elongated plate with a substantially planar proximal portion 130a and a curved distal portion 130b. The curved distal portion 130b also tapers to a pointed distal tip 131 that is designed for introduction into an intervertebral space. The substantially planar proximal portion of shim 132 has a height h greater than its thickness t to minimize obstruction of access to the disc space when the shim is in place, and the height of the shim narrows anteriorly to pointed distal tip 131. Shim 132 further has a reversed curvature, in that its distal portion 130b is curved away from ipsilateral retraction blade 122 and toward contralateral retraction blade 120.
The curvature of the distal portion of shim 132 is relatively slight, being only 5-15 degrees out of the plane of the planar proximal portion 130a of shim 130. Alternatively, as shown in
As shown in
Shim 132 also rigidly couples ipsilateral retractor blade 122 in fixed relation relative to the vertebral bodies, and helps ensure that surgical instruments employed within the operative corridor are not advanced outside the operative corridor, thereby avoiding inadvertent contact with the exiting nerve roots and vasculature during the surgery. Once the operative corridor is established, any of a variety of surgical instruments, devices, or implants may be passed through and/or manipulated within the operative corridor depending upon the given surgical procedure.
Superior and inferior soft tissue retractors (not shown) may also be placed as needed for retraction for any creeping retroperitoneal contents to allow creation of a box-type approach to the L5-S1 disc space. Discectomy is than carried out in a conventional fashion to evacuate as much of the disc and interspace contents as possible. The handle portion 112 may be coupled to any number of mechanisms for rigidly registering it in fixed relation to the operative site, such as through the use of an articulating arm mounted to the operating table 22.
Once the discectomy has been completed, trial implants are introduced into the L5-S1 disc space 70 to select an appropriate size final implant, and a final implant is then introduced into the disc space.
As shown best in
Threaded rod 150 and coupling pins 154, 156 form an example of a docking element of introducer instrument 140. The docking element selectively docks with an interface element 170 of an implant 172, as shown in
An example of an implant 172 is shown in greater detail in
In use, introducer instrument 140 is secured to an implant 172 by threading rod 150 into opening 191 of rotation pin 188 by rotating handle 146 to turn shaft 147 within sheath 142. Handle 146 is rotated until implant 172 is tightly secured to distal tip 152 and pins 154, 156 are aligned with and inserted within a pair of the upper and lower aligned docking holes. The angular relationship between instrument 140 and implant 172 can be altered by slightly unscrewing threaded rod 150 from threaded opening 191. This action moves face 160 of distal tip 152 sufficiently out of engagement with interface element 170 to disengage pins 154, 156 from a first set of docking holes without completely disconnecting instrument 140 from implant 172. The implant 172 and instrument 140 can then pivot relative to one another until sheath 142 is again advanced to engage coupling pins 152, 154 with a new pair of docking holes by rotating handle 146 to once again securely engage instrument 140 to implant 172, so that the implant is fixed at a new angular relationship with the instrument.
Although a particular embodiment of the device is illustrated in which the angular relationship between instrument 140 and implant 172 can be selectively altered, many other means for varying this angular relationship to pivot the implant are contemplated. For example, rotation of handle 146 can actuate a gear that pivots implant 172, or handle rotation can actuate a cam that selectively moves pins 154, 156 to selectively engage and disengage them from interface element 170. Alternatively the tip of instrument 140 can fit into a slot within implant 172 to pivot the implant as instrument 140 is moved from the contralateral to the ipsilateral arm of the retractor instrument. In other embodiments, a universal joint is provided between the instrument 140 and implant 172 to selectively pivot the implant relative to the instrument. Different numbers and arrangements of the pins can also be provided. Electronic devices can also be used that rotate the implant in the plane of the disc space while maintaining the instrument within the operative pathway defined between the retraction blades of instrument 140.
Additional features of implant 172 are shown in detail in
Top and bottom faces 176, 178 are provided with protuberances 206 that also help promote bone growth into implant 172. The protuberances may take a variety of shapes, but the illustrated frustopyramidal protuberances 206 are believed to be particularly suitable for this purpose.
In addition to the implant, trial spacers are also provided to help assess the size of the disc space once the disc space contents have been evacuated but before the final implant is advanced into the disc space.
An interface element 270 (
Lips 292, 294 of interface element 270 can have a series of spaced docking holes such as that shown in
As shown in
Like implant 172, implant 272 can be provided with protuberances 306 that help promote bone growth into implant 172. As noted above, such protuberances can take a variety of shapes. Also like implant 172, implant 272 can be at least partially hollow and can have one or more windows (e.g., windows 300, 302). Windows 300, 302 can provide the same benefits as windows 200, 202 in the previous embodiment, which is to provide communication between the open bottom and top faces of the implant to promote ingrowth of tissue within and through implant 272. Implant 272 can also have one or more openings 303 that extend through a side wall of the implant to further promote ingrowth of tissue and to facilitate access to internal areas of implant 272 (e.g., access to one or both of windows 300, 302) when implant 272 is implanted in the body.
Windows 300, 302 can extend between top and bottom faces 276, 278 as shown in
Because rotation pin 222 is positioned horizontally (
As with the other implants described herein, implant 220 can be provided with one or more windows 228, 230 and a plurality of protrusions 232 to promote the ingrowth of tissue. Implant 220 can also be provided with a plurality of docking holes 234 to help lock or secure implant 220 to a distal end of instrument 140. Alternatively, implant 220 can be secured to the instrument 140 via a frictional fit or other similar mechanism.
Once the operative corridor has been established by retraction instrument 110 and the operative field has been exposed, a trial spacer 210 is attached to introducer instrument 140 and advanced into the L5-S1 disc space as shown in
As trial spacer 210 enters the illustrated L5-S1 disc space (
Trial spacers of different sizes may be introduced into the disc space and pivoted from the diagonal to the medial-lateral orientation until a trial spacer of the appropriate size and height is found. Introducer instrument 140 is detached from trial spacer 210 by rotating handle to unscrew threaded 150 from the internally threaded opening of trial spacer 210 to secure different trial spacers until the correct one is found. The trial spacer is then withdrawn from the disc space and detached from introducer instrument 140, and the final implant 172 is directly laterally attached to distal tip 152 of introducer instrument 140 (as illustrated in
Additional positioning of implant 172 can be achieved by pushing it with the tip of instrument 140, or with other elongated instruments introduced through retractor instrument 110. Retractor instrument 110 can then be removed from the body by moving arms 116, 118 toward one another to reduce the width of instrument 110 then withdrawing it from the body. Normal closure of the surgical incisions on the body surface is then carried out.
Implant 272 is desirably secured to the distal end of instrument 140 so that divider wall 304 is generally in-line with axis 350 of instrument 140. In this manner, implant 272 can exhibit increased strength to ensure that it can withstand the impaction force, which is generally applied along the axis 350 to deliver implant 272 to the desired location in the body.
The implants described herein can be coated with and/or impregnated with various elements to promote bone in-growth. In a preferred embodiment, stem cells can be delivered along with the implant (either delivered into openings in the implant or coated thereon) to improve and facilitate bone in-growth. In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/149,108 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,959,860) entitled “METHOD OF RETROPERITONEAL LATERAL INSERTION OF SPINAL IMPLANTS” filed on Oct. 1, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/235,957 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,085,854) entitled “METHOD OF RETROPERITONEAL LATERAL INSERTION OF SPINAL IMPLANTS” filed on Aug. 12, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/239,014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,451,940) entitled “METHOD OF RETROPERITONEAL LATERAL INSERTION OF SPINAL IMPLANTS” filed on Sep. 21, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/133,909 entitled “MINIMALLY-INVASIVE RETROPERITONEAL LATERAL APPROACH FOR SPINAL SURGERY” filed on Jun. 9, 2011, which was the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2009/069476, filed Dec. 23, 2009, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/178,315, filed May 14, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/140,926, filed Dec. 26, 2008, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1706500 | Smith | Mar 1929 | A |
D245789 | Shea et al. | Sep 1977 | S |
4512351 | Pohndorf | Apr 1985 | A |
4515168 | Chester et al. | May 1985 | A |
4519403 | Dickhudt | May 1985 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4561445 | Berke et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562832 | Wilder et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4592369 | Davis et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4595013 | Jones et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4595018 | Rantala | Jun 1986 | A |
4611597 | Kraus | Sep 1986 | A |
4616635 | Caspar et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4633889 | Talalla | Jan 1987 | A |
4658835 | Pohndorf | Apr 1987 | A |
D295445 | Freeman | Apr 1988 | S |
4744371 | Harris | May 1988 | A |
4753223 | Bremer | Jun 1988 | A |
4759377 | Dykstra | Jul 1988 | A |
4784150 | Voorhies et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4807642 | Brown | Feb 1989 | A |
D300561 | Asa et al. | Apr 1989 | S |
4892105 | Prass | Jan 1990 | A |
4913134 | Luque | Apr 1990 | A |
4917274 | Asa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917704 | Frey et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4926865 | Oman | May 1990 | A |
4934352 | Sullivan | Jun 1990 | A |
4950257 | Hibbs et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962766 | Herzon | Oct 1990 | A |
4964411 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5007902 | Witt | Apr 1991 | A |
5015247 | Michelson | May 1991 | A |
5045054 | Hood et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052373 | Michelson | Oct 1991 | A |
5058602 | Brody | Oct 1991 | A |
5081990 | Deletis | Jan 1992 | A |
5092344 | Lee | Mar 1992 | A |
5127403 | Brownlee | Jul 1992 | A |
5161533 | Prass et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5196015 | Neubardt | Mar 1993 | A |
5215100 | Spitz et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
RE34390 | Culver | Sep 1993 | E |
D340521 | Heinzelman et al. | Oct 1993 | S |
5255691 | Otten | Oct 1993 | A |
5282468 | Klepinski | Feb 1994 | A |
5284153 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284154 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295994 | Bonutti | Mar 1994 | A |
5297538 | Daniel | Mar 1994 | A |
5299563 | Seton | Apr 1994 | A |
5312417 | Wilk | May 1994 | A |
5313956 | Knutsson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313962 | Obenchain | May 1994 | A |
5327902 | Lemmen | Jul 1994 | A |
5331975 | Bonutti | Jul 1994 | A |
5333618 | Lekhtman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5342384 | Sugarbaker | Aug 1994 | A |
5352219 | Reddy | Oct 1994 | A |
5357983 | Mathews | Oct 1994 | A |
5375067 | Berchin | Dec 1994 | A |
5375594 | Cueva | Dec 1994 | A |
5383876 | Nardella | Jan 1995 | A |
5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
5450845 | Alexgaard | Sep 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474057 | Makower et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474558 | Neubardt | Dec 1995 | A |
5480440 | Kambin | Jan 1996 | A |
5482038 | Ruff | Jan 1996 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5487739 | Aebischer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509893 | Pracas | Apr 1996 | A |
5514153 | Bonutti | May 1996 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness et al. | May 1996 | A |
5540235 | Wilson | Jul 1996 | A |
5549656 | Reiss | Aug 1996 | A |
5560372 | Cory | Oct 1996 | A |
5566678 | Cadwell | Oct 1996 | A |
5569290 | McAfee | Oct 1996 | A |
5571149 | Liss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579781 | Cooke | Dec 1996 | A |
5593429 | Ruff | Jan 1997 | A |
5599279 | Slotman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609635 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | A |
5630813 | Kieturakis | May 1997 | A |
5667508 | Errico et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671752 | Sinderby et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681265 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688223 | Rosendahl | Nov 1997 | A |
5707359 | Bufalini | Jan 1998 | A |
5711307 | Smits | Jan 1998 | A |
5728046 | Mayer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5759159 | Masreliez | Jun 1998 | A |
5762629 | Kambin | Jun 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5775331 | Raymond et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776144 | Leysieffer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776199 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
5779642 | Nightengale | Jul 1998 | A |
5785658 | Benaron | Jul 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797854 | Hedgecock | Aug 1998 | A |
5797909 | Michelson | Aug 1998 | A |
5814073 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
5830151 | Hadzic et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851191 | Gozani | Dec 1998 | A |
5853373 | Griffith et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
5862314 | Jeddeloh | Jan 1999 | A |
5872314 | Clinton | Feb 1999 | A |
5885210 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
5885219 | Nightengale | Mar 1999 | A |
5888196 | Bonutti | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895352 | Kleiner | Apr 1999 | A |
5902231 | Foley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928158 | Aristides | Jul 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5935131 | Bonutti et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938688 | Schiff | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5976094 | Gozani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984922 | McKay | Nov 1999 | A |
6004262 | Putz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004312 | Finneran | Dec 1999 | A |
6007487 | Foley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010520 | Pattison | Jan 2000 | A |
6024696 | Hoftman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024697 | Pisarik | Feb 2000 | A |
6027456 | Feler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030401 | Marino | Feb 2000 | A |
6038469 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038477 | Kayyali | Mar 2000 | A |
6042540 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050992 | Nichols | Apr 2000 | A |
6074343 | Nathanson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080105 | Spears | Jun 2000 | A |
6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
6083154 | Liu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095987 | Schmulewitz | Aug 2000 | A |
6096026 | Schultz | Aug 2000 | A |
6104957 | Alo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104960 | Duysens et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120503 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6126660 | Dietz | Oct 2000 | A |
6132386 | Gozani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132387 | Gozani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135965 | Tumer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139493 | Koros et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142931 | Kaji | Nov 2000 | A |
6143032 | Schafer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146335 | Gozani | Nov 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6159215 | Urbahns et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161047 | King et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174311 | Branch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181961 | Prass | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183517 | Suddaby | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196969 | Bester et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217509 | Foley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221082 | Marino et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224545 | Cocchia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6224549 | Drongelen | May 2001 | B1 |
6224603 | Marino | May 2001 | B1 |
6245082 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245108 | Biscup | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251140 | Marino et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259945 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264651 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266394 | Marino | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266558 | Gozani et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273905 | Streeter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280447 | Marino et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290724 | Marino | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292701 | Prass et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306100 | Prass | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308712 | Shaw | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312392 | Herzon | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312443 | Stone | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325764 | Griffith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334068 | Hacker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348058 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360750 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368325 | McKinley et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387070 | Marino et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387130 | Stone et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395007 | Bhatnagar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6416465 | Brau | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6425859 | Foley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425887 | McGuckin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425901 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450952 | Rioux et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451015 | Rittman, III et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466817 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468205 | Mollenauer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468207 | Fowler, Jr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478805 | Marino et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485518 | Cornwall et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491626 | Stone et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500116 | Knapp | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500128 | Marino | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6519319 | Marino et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520907 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524320 | DiPoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533797 | Stone et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535759 | Epstein et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540747 | Marino | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564078 | Marino et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579244 | Goodwin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599294 | Fuss et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6620157 | Dabney et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645194 | Briscoe et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679833 | Smith et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6719692 | Kleffner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723043 | Kleeman et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6760616 | Hoey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764452 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770074 | Michelson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796985 | Bolger et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802844 | Ferree | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810281 | Brock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819956 | DiLorenzo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829508 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847849 | Mamo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849047 | Goodwin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852126 | Ahlgren | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855105 | Jackson, III et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6902569 | Parmer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869398 | Obenchain | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871099 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6887248 | McKinley et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916330 | Simonson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923814 | Hildebrand et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6926728 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929606 | Ritland | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945933 | Branch | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945973 | Bray | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951538 | Ritland | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964674 | Matsuura et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7025769 | Ferree | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7047082 | Schrom et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7050848 | Hoey et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079883 | Marino et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089059 | Pless | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7115132 | Errico et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125380 | Yager | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156875 | Michelson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162850 | Marino et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166113 | Arambula et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169182 | Errico et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177677 | Kaula et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198598 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207949 | Miles et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207991 | Michelson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226451 | Shluzas et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235081 | Errico et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235082 | Bartish et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261688 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7288093 | Michelson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320688 | Foley et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326216 | Bertagnoli et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341587 | Molz et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341590 | Ferree | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7361193 | Frey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7452359 | Michelson | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7455692 | Michelson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462195 | Michelson | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7470236 | Kelleher et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7473222 | Dewey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7476252 | Foley | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481766 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481812 | Frey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485146 | Crook et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7491205 | Michelson | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7503933 | Michelson | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513869 | Branch et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522953 | Kaula et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524285 | Branch et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527649 | Blain | May 2009 | B1 |
7556601 | Branch et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582058 | Miles et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7643884 | Pond et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7691057 | Miles et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693562 | Marino et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7717959 | William et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7819801 | Miles et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7935051 | Miles et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8000782 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005535 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8021430 | Michelson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8133173 | Miles et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8182423 | Miles et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192356 | Miles et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8251997 | Michelson | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8303458 | Fukano et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8343046 | Miles et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8343224 | Lynn et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388527 | Miles | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8394144 | Zehavi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409290 | Zamani et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8506629 | Weiland | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8562521 | Miles | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8602982 | Miles | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8740783 | Gharib et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9028553 | Lindenmann et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9345587 | Mitchell | May 2016 | B2 |
9451940 | Spann | Sep 2016 | B2 |
10478313 | Sweeney, III | Nov 2019 | B1 |
20010034535 | Schultz | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010039949 | Loubser | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056280 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007129 | Marino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010392 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013514 | Brau | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020065481 | Cory | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072686 | Hoey et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077632 | Tsou | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120336 | Santilli | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123744 | Reynard | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123780 | Grill et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161415 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165612 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193843 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032966 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060687 | Kleeman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070682 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105503 | Marino | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139648 | Foley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149341 | Clifton | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030225405 | Weiner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233147 | Nicholson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236544 | Lunsford et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024291 | Zinkel | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040106927 | Ruffner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117020 | Frey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040176665 | Branch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199084 | Kelleher et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225228 | Ferree | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004593 | Simonson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004623 | Miles et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033380 | Tanner et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043796 | Grant et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071009 | Muhanna et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075578 | Gharib et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080320 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149035 | Pimenta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182454 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192575 | Pacheco | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060025703 | Miles et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052828 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069315 | Miles et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060195017 | Shluzas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224044 | Marchek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224078 | Hoey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229627 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241761 | Gately | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016097 | Farquhar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055109 | Bass et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093850 | Harris et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100212 | Pimenta et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156026 | Frasier et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173941 | Allard | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179611 | DePoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198062 | Miles et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203580 | Yeh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208227 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213826 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225726 | Dye et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225808 | Warnick | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255415 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282449 | de Villiers | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293782 | Marino | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021285 | Drzyzga et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058606 | Miles et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058838 | Steinberg | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064976 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064977 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065082 | Chang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065144 | Marino et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065178 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065219 | Dye | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071191 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077241 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077247 | Murillo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091211 | Gately | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097164 | Miles et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080119851 | Shelokov | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140085 | Gately et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183046 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215153 | Butterman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221694 | Warnick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300465 | Feigenwinter et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080300688 | Cannon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306489 | Altarac | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030423 | Puno | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043345 | Matthews | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099660 | Scifert et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124860 | Miles et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138050 | Ferree | May 2009 | A1 |
20090192403 | Gharib et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204016 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090259108 | Miles et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276049 | Weiland | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100069783 | Miles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094422 | Hansell et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130827 | Pimenta et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152603 | Miles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160738 | Miles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174146 | Miles | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174148 | Miles et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110313530 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010472 | Spann | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010715 | Spann | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010716 | Spann | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010717 | Spann | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035730 | Spann | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120130429 | Mitchell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120238822 | Miles | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238893 | Farquhar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20170112635 | Ty et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299 08 259 | Jul 1999 | DE |
10048790 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0334116 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0567424 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0972538 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1002500 | May 2000 | EP |
2795624 | Jan 2001 | FR |
793186 | May 1990 | JP |
10-14928 | Mar 1996 | JP |
3019990007098 | Nov 1999 | KR |
WO 199428824 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 199700702 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 199823324 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 199952446 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 200027291 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 200038574 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 200044288 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 200066217 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 200067645 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 200108563 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 200137728 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 200160263 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2002054960 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 2002058780 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 200271953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 200287678 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2003005887 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003026482 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2003037170 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2005013805 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005030318 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006042241 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006066217 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006079356 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007016247 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2010075555 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“MetRx System MicroEndoscopic Discectomy: An Evolution in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery,” Sofamor Danek, 1999, 6 pages. |
“Sofamor Danek MED Microendoscopic Discectomy System Brochure” including Rapp “New endoscopic lumbar technique improves access preserves tissue” Reprinted with permission from: Orthopedics Today, 1998, 18(1): 2 pages. |
Baulot et al., Adjuvant Anterior Spinal Fusion via Thoracoscopy, Lyon Chirurgical, 1994, 90(5): 347-351 (13 pages with English Translation and Certificate of Translation. |
Bergey et al., “Endoscopic Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Lumbar Spine,” Spine, 2004, 29(15): 1681-1688. |
Brau, “Chapter 22: Anterior Retroperitoneal Muscle-Sparing approach to L2-S1 of the Lumbar Spine,” Surgical Approaches to the Spine. Robert G. Watkins, MD. (ed) 2003. pp. 165-181. |
Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/169,919 by Spann entitled “MINIMAtty-Invasive Retroperitoneal Lateral Approach for Spinal Surgery” filed Jun. 27, 2011. |
Crock, H.V. MD., “Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number One Hundred Sixty Five, 1982, pp. 157-163, 13 pages. |
De Peretti et al., “New possibilities in L2-L5 lumbar arthrodesis using a lateral retroperitoneal approach assisted by laparoscopy: preliminary results,” Eur Spine J, 1996, 5: 210-216. |
Dezawa et al., “Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A New Approach, Technique, and Clinical Trial,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, 2000, 13(2): 138-143. |
Dirksmeier et al., “Microendoscopic and Open Laminotomy and Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Disease” Seminars in Spine Surgery, 1999, 11(2): 138-146. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. EP09835860, date of completion: Feb. 7, 2013 (6 pages). |
Foley and Smith, “Microendoscopic Discectomy,” Techniques in Neurosurgery, 1997, 3(4):301-307. |
Friedman, “Percutaneous discectomy: An alternative to chemonucleolysis,” Neurosurgery, 1983, 13(5): 542-547. |
Gardocki, “Tubular diskectomy minimizes collateral damage: A logical progression moves spine surgery forward,” AAOS Now, 2009, 5 pages. |
Gumbs et al., “Open Anterior Approaches for Lumbar Spine Procedures,” The American Journal of Surgery 194:98-102, 2007. |
Gumbs et al., “The Open Anterior Paramedian Relroperitoneal Approach for Spine Procedures,” Arch Surg 140:339-343, Apr. 2005. |
Hovorka et al., “Five years' experience of retroperitoneal lumbar and thoracolumbar surgery,” Eur Spine J., 2000, 9(1): S30-S34. |
Intemational Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/069476, mailed Aug. 17, 2010. (5 pages). |
Kossman et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine,” Eur Spine J, 2001, 10: 396-402. |
Kossmann et al., “Minimally Invasive Vertebral Replacement with Cages in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine,” European Journal of Trauma, 2001, 27: 292-300. |
Mathews et al., “Laparoscopic Discectomy with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine, 1995, 20(16): 1797-1802. |
Mayer and Brock, “Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy,” J. Neurosurg. 1993, 78: 216-225. |
Mayer and Wiechert, “Microsurgical Anterior Approaches to the Lumbar Spine for Interbody Fusion and Total Disc Replacement,” Neurosurgery, 2002, 51(2): 159-165. |
Mayer H. M., “Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Surgical Manual”, Springer, 262 pages, 2000. |
Mayer, “A New Microsurgical Technique for Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Spine, 1997, 22(6): 691-699. |
Mayer, “The ALIF Concept,” Eur Spine J., 2000, 9(1): S35-S43. |
McAfee et al., “Minimally Invasive Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach to the Lumbar Spine: Emphasis on the Lateral BAK,” Spine, 1998, 23(13): 1476-1484. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “METRx System Surgical Technique,” 2004, 22 pages. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek “METRx™ MicroDiscectomy System,” Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, 2000, 21 pgs. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2009329873, dale of issue: Mar. 7, 2014. (4 pages). |
Pimenta et al., “Implante de protese de nucleo pulposo: analise inicial,” Journal Brasileiro de Neurocirurgia, 2001, 12(2): 93-96 English Abstract. |
Pimenta et al., “The Lateral Endoscopic Transpsoas Retroperitoneal Approach (Letra) for Implants in the Lumbar Spine,” World Spine II—Second Interdisciplinary Congress on Spine Care, Aug. 2003, 2 pages. |
Pimenta, “Initial Clinical Results of Direct Lateral, Minimally Invasive Access to the Lumbar Spine for Disc Nucleus Replacement Using a Novel Neurophysiological Monitoring System.” The 9th IMAST, May 2002, 1 page. |
Rao, et al. “Dynamic retraction of the psoas muscle to expose the lumbar spine using the retroperitoneal approach,” J. Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 5: 468-470. |
Schaffer and Kambin, “Percutaneous Posterolateral Lumbar Discectomy and Decompression with a 6.9-Millimeter Cannula,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1991, 73A(6): 822-831. |
Schick et al., “Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study,” Eur Spine J, 2002, 11: 20-26. |
Smith and Foley “MetRx System MicroEndoscopic Discectomy: Surgical Technique” Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2000, 24 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,909, mailed Jul. 2, 2013. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,042, mailed Feb. 6, 2014. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,053, mailed Feb. 13, 2014. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,909, mailed Mar. 20, 2013. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed Sep. 14, 2015. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,024, mailed Jun. 17, 2014. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed Oct. 30, 2013. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,024, mailed Jul. 19, 2013. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,042, mailed Oct. 30, 2013. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,053, mailed Oct. 18, 2013. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,909, mailed Dec. 26, 2013. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed Dec. 24, 2013. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed Dec. 31, 2015. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed May 6, 2015. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,024, mailed Dec. 30, 2013. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,042, mailed Dec. 27, 2013. |
USPTO Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,053, mailed Dec. 26, 2013. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,909, mailed Jul. 13, 2012. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/133,909, mailed Sep. 10, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed Dec. 4, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,014, mailed Feb. 21, 2013. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,024, mailed Dec. 20, 2012. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,024, mailed Jan. 28, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,024, mailed Nov. 28, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,042, mailed Dec. 4, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,042, mailed Mar. 6, 2013. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,053, mailed Nov. 6, 2014. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,053, mailed Jan. 29, 2013. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction/Election for U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,053, mailed Nov. 2, 2012. |
Wolfla et al., “Retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion with titanium threaded fusion cages,” J. Neurosurg (Spine 1), 2002, 96: 50-55. |
Zdeblick, Thomas A. (ed.). Anterior Approaches to the Spine, 1999, Chapters 11, 13, and 14, 43 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210205097 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61140926 | Dec 2008 | US | |
61178315 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16149108 | Oct 2018 | US |
Child | 17209874 | US | |
Parent | 15235957 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 16149108 | US | |
Parent | 13239014 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 15235957 | US | |
Parent | 13133909 | US | |
Child | 13239014 | US |