Method of rolling hot mill band on a twin stand reversing mill

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5752403
  • Patent Number
    5,752,403
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 25, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 19, 1998
    26 years ago
Abstract
A method of hot rolling steel slabs of thin to standard thickness into hot mill band is carried out on a hot reversing mill having a coiler furnace upstream and downstream of the reversing mill. A twin stand hot reversing mill is used and the slab is introduced into the first stand of the mill without any breakdown pass. Flat passes of the slab back and forth through the first stand and the second stand occur to form an intermediate product having a thickness capable of being coiled. Thereafter, the intermediate product is coiled on one of the upstream or downstream drums. The product is then passed back and forth between the first and second stand in tandem. An edging stand is positioned between the reversing stands to edge the product during the flat passes. The final product is removed from the hot mill band in one of sheet, plate or coil form.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the rolling of hot mill band and more particularly to the rolling of hot mill band from thin to standard size slabs on a twin stand hot reversing mill having a coiler furnace on each side thereof.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In our copending application directed to a method of rolling light gauge hot mill band on a hot reversing mill, we disclose a preferred method for rolling light gauge hot mill band on the order of 0.040" through the use of a twin stand hot reversing tandem mill having coiler furnaces on either side thereof.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,511,303, issued Apr. 30, 1996 and filed on even date with the above-identified parent application, we also disclose a twin stand hot reversing mill. In this patent, the twin stand hot reversing mill is inline with an intermediate thickness caster and a vertical edger mill is positioned intermediate the two hot reversing stands. It is also disclosed that in addition to introducing inline intermediate thickness slabs from a continuous caster, outsource slabs, which may have a thickness greater than that cast on the intermediate thickness caster, may be introduced into the processing line.
Others have disclosed twin stand mills, but these mills are either operated independently and not in a twin reversing mode or require a roughing mill upstream of the twin stand mill and/or additional finishing stands downstream of the twin stand hot reversing mill. Representative of these teachings are U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,497,191; 3,331,232; 4,494,395 and British Patent Specification No. 918,005.
The need remains for a hot rolling method which will accommodate the many slab sizes that are now available for hot rolling and produce a wide range of product mix including substantially varying chemistries and substantially varying thicknesses and widths. All of this must be accomplished with a reasonable capital expenditure and a production capacity to assure a reasonable return on the investment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Our invention is a method of hot rolling steel slabs of intermediate and/or standard thickness into hot mill band. The method utilizes a twin stand hot reversing mill preferably having a vertical edger positioned therebetween and having upstream and downstream coiler furnaces inline with the twin stand hot reversing mill. The slabs are introduced directly into the first stand of the twin stand without any previous breakdown pass. The slab is flat passed back and forth through the twin stand hot reversing mill with the individual stands working in tandem. The flat passes continue until an intermediate product having a thickness capable of being coiled is formed. The intermediate product is then passed back and forth through the hot reversing mill in tandem and between the upstream and downstream coilers. The reduction of the intermediate product is continued until the hot mill band of the desired thickness is formed. Thereafter, the hot mill band is passed through a finishing area where it is removed from the hot mill in either sheet, plate or coil form.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIGURE 1 is a schematic showing the twin stand hot reversing mill processing line where the method is being carried out.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The general arrangement of the hot mill 10 is illustrated in FIGURE 1. The mill 10 includes a pair of four high hot reversing mill stands 16 and 18, each having a pair of backup rolls and a pair of work rolls. A coiler furnace 20 is positioned upstream of the mill stand 16 and a coiler furnace 22 is positioned downstream of the mill stand 18. Each coiler furnace 20 and 22 includes a drum about which the product being rolled is coiled once it has been reduced to a thickness capable of being coiled.
A slab source 12 consisting of a continuous caster and/or a slabbing mill and/or an outsource of supply is provided. The slabs can be of a thin slab thickness or an intermediate slab thickness or a standard slab thickness. By thin slab thickness, we mean on the order of about 2 inches or less. By intermediate slab thickness, we mean a slab generally on the order of greater than 3 inches and up to about 6 inches and by a standard slab, we mean a slab having a thickness of 6 to 10 inches. The slabs are fed into a reheat and/or soaking furnace 14 where they are brought to the appropriate hot rolling temperature and temperature homogeneity. The slab is then introduced along the pass line into the first hot reversing mill stand 16 and then subsequently into the second hot reversing mill stand 18. The slab is passed back and forth through mill stands 16 and 18 in a series of flat tandem passes until the slab has been reduced to an intermediate product having a thickness capable of being coiled. During the flat passes, the slab is subjected to the vertical edger 24. Vertical edger 24 is intended to be used conventionally or to taper the leading and trailing ends, respectively, of the slab on the first pass through the mill stands 16 and 18 so as to compensate for the flaring of the extreme ends which occurs during subsequent rolling. Such tapering can be controlled by the Automatic Gauge Control (AGC) and the vertical edger 24 can be passively driven by the twin mill stands 16 and 18 of the mill 10. The effectiveness of the tapered ends can be monitored by a width gauge at the exit end of the downstream hot reversing stand 18 wherein a fingerprint of the width is taken and adjustments are made through a feedback loop to the vertical edger 24, where necessary. Generally, the vertical edger 24 is used on flat passes until a thickness of about 2 inches is achieved.
The intermediate product, when it has achieved a thickness on the order of an inch or less, can be easily coiled and the subsequent passes through the twin mill stands 16 and 18 are taken by passing the strip back and forth between the coiler furnaces 20 and 22. The use of the second mill stand 18 not only increases productivity over a single mill stand, but also improves efficiency by providing an additional source for tensioning, which is particularly relevant as the thinner gauge hot mill bands are rolled.
Generally, a coil is formed on the upstream coiler 20 prior to the last pass through each of the mill stands 16 and 18. Following the last pass through each of the mill stands 16 and 18, the coil, which is now reduced to the desired thickness, enters the finishing unit 26. The finishing unit can either be a down coiler, a cut-to-length line or an appropriate shear and cooling bed crossover for the handling of plate product. Conventional equipment, such as crop shears, scale breakers, cooling sprays and the like is obviously present but is not shown in the schematic drawing.
In order to support the unique operation of the twin stand hot reversing mill 10, a sophisticated control strategy incorporating specialized software and hardware components has been developed to control the operation of the mill 10. Dependent upon the rolling parameters required for a particular product, the control system will first calculate the rolling schedule for that product empirically. Then as the band is being processed from pass to pass, the control system will recalculate the rolling schedule for each subsequent pass based on the actual data acquired during the rolling process. This recalculation will maximize the operation of the twin stand mill 10 based on the actual temperature characteristics and gauge of the band as it exits the second mill stand 16 or 18 for that particular pass. This recalculation will reset the speed and the roll gap settings for each mill stand 16 and 18, predicated on which mill stand 16 or 18 is now the first stand and which mill stand 16 or 18 is now the second stand which alternates with each pass. The key to the operation of the mill 10 is that the new operating parameters, as calculated by the control system, will determine the maximum speed each mill stand 16 and 18 can operate at, taking into consideration the percent of reduction required in each mill stand 16 and 18, mass flow of the hot band between mill stands 16 and 18, required band temperature, and the amount of horsepower/torque per mill stand 16 or 18, which will vary with each pass as the thickness of the band is reduced. Further to providing the operational parameters for the mill 10, the speed at which this calculating process takes place is critical, in that, any type of delay can effect the properties, quality and the production rate for any particular product being produced on the mill 10.
The utilization of the twin stand hot mill has been projected to produce 1,295,000 tons annually of the product mix set forth in Table I.
TABLE I______________________________________PRODUCT MIXSteel Grade Tons Gauge (in) Width (in)______________________________________AISI 1002-1008 465,000 .040-.375 30-62AISI 1009-1018 185,000 .040-.375 30-62AISI 1019-1050 170,000 .040-.375 30-62AISI 1051-1095 205,000 .061-.375 30-62HSLA 95,000 .061-.375 30-62409 Stainless Steel 70,000 .060-.375 37-62304 Stainless Steel 45,000 .060-.250 37-62316 Stainless Steel 25,000 .091-.375 37-62Silicon Steel 35,000 .060-.126 37-55Total 1,295,000______________________________________
This product mix is produced from a mix of slab thicknesses ranging from 5.5 inches to 10.0 inches. Such a slab mix can be supplied from on site steelmaking facilities, toll production or purchased slabs.
The use of the twin stand hot reversing mill results in production rates of generally 190 tons per hour, and greater, depending upon the finish gauge and width.
The above description will be clarified in the following examples. The following computer simulated examples illustrate three different sized slabs all being hot rolled on the twin stand mill 10.
EXAMPLE I
A 51/2 inch thick slab 37 inches wide of high carbon AISI 1051-1095 steel is reduced to a hot mill band of 0.060 inches in a series of ten passes. Coiling begins on the upstream coiler after the fourth pass.
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________18.500 tons 1000. PIWRolling Schedule HSM - 37.00 - 5.500/ .0600 Mill Bite Mill Speed Strip Speed Roll Delay ElapsedPass Stand Gauge % Draft Angle Length FPM FPM Time Time TimeNo. Name in. Red in. Deg. ft. Thread Roll Front Body sec. sec. sec.__________________________________________________________________________0 FCE: 5.5000 .0 .000 .00 53.5 .0 .0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .001 TF1: 3.9350 28.5 1.565 17.99 74.8 336.2 512.3 336.2 512.3 8.76 .00 8.762 TF2: 2.5200 36.0 1.415 17.10 116.9 525.0 800.0 525.0 800.0 8.76 3.00 14.983 TF2: 1.5250 39.5 .995 14.33 193.1 309.8 737.7 737.7 309.8 25.71 .00 40.684 TF1: .9000 41.0 .625 11.34 327.2 525.0 1250.0 1250.0 525.0 23.69 3.00 45.155 TF1: .4750 47.2 .425 9.35 619.9 273.0 1040.0 273.0 1040.0 50.76 .00 95.916 TF2: .2470 48.0 .228 6.84 1192.2 525.0 2000.0 525.0 2000.0 47.84 3.00 99.957 TF2: .1420 42.5 .105 4.64 2073.7 342.0 1628.5 1628.5 342.0 93.34 .00 193.288 TF1: .0925 34.9 .050 3.19 3183.5 525.0 2500.0 2500.0 525.0 90.84 3.00. 196.959 TF1: .0690 25.4 .024 2.20 4267.7 456.5 2173.9 456.5 2173.9 120.15 .00 317.1010 TF2: .0600 13.0 .009 1.36 4907.8 525.0 2500.0 525.0 2500.0 117.79 .00 317.10__________________________________________________________________________Mill Entry Exit Roll RMSStand Gauge Temp. Temp. Force Torque Horse Load TimeName in. Deg. F Deg. F lb .times. 10**6 lb-ft .times. 10**6 Power Ratio sec.__________________________________________________________________________FCE: 5.5000 2250.00 2250.00 .0000 .0000 0. .0000 .00TF1: 3.9350 2218.77 2213.86 2.6062 1.0802 12578. 1.8360 29.54TF2: 2.5200 2210.34 2219.73 2.9032 1.1425 20773. 1.9419 33.05TF2: 1.5250 2170.17 2164.92 3.0640 1.0080 16901. 1.7133 75.47TF1: .9000 2151.90 2167.15 2.9209 .7575 21520. 1.5371 55.96TF1: .4750 2131.18 2150.47 3.2585 .6902 16315. 1.1732 69.86TF2: .2470 2138.61 2162.57 3.1644 .4810 21866. 1.5619 116.71TF2: .1420 2088.70 2102.68 3.0025 .2980 11030. .7879 57.94TF1: .0925 1999.91 2012.92 2.9099 .1867 10610. .7579 52.18TF1: .0690 1920.02 1919.28 2.6649 .1088 5378. .3841 17.73TF2: .0600 1893.00 1875.83 1.6542 .0384 2180. .1557 2.86__________________________________________________________________________Reversing Tandem Mill RMS Production: 210.03 TPHReversing Tandem Mill Peak Production: 210.03 TPHCoiling begins at Pass Number: 4 TF1Tandem Passes begin at Pass Number: 1 TF1Distance Between Cfce #1 and Mill: 35.00 ft.Distance Between Mill and Cfce #2: 35.00 ft.__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE II
A 7 inch thick, 48 inch wide slab of AISI Type 304 stainless steel is reduced to 0.070 gauge in twelve passes. Coiling of the intermediate product begins at the conclusion of the sixth pass in the upstream coiler.
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________24.596 tons 1025. PIWRolling Schedule HSM - 48.00 - 7.0000/ .0700 Mill Bite Mill Speed Strip Speed Roll Delay ElapsedPass Stand Gauge % Draft Angle Length FPM FPM Time Time TimeNo. Name in. Red in. Deg. ft. Thread Roll Front Body sec. sec. sec.__________________________________________________________________________0 FCE: 7.0000 .0 0.000 .00 42.1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .001 TF1: 5.8500 16.41 .150 15.41 50.3 412.8 511.1 412.8 511.1 5.91 .00 5.912 TF2: 4.6000 21.4 1.250 16.07 64.0 525.0 650.0 525.0 650.0 5.91 3.00 11.533 TF2: 3.4000 26.1 1.200 15.74 86.6 359.8 548.2 548.2 359.8 9.48 .00 21.004 TF1: 2.3300 31.5 1.070 14.86 126.4 525.0 800.0 800.0 525.0 9.48 3.00 27.015 TF1: 1.6250 30.3 .705 12.05 181.2 313.4 626.8 313.4 626.8 25.70 .00 52.706 TF2: .9700 40.3 .655 11.61 303.6 525.0 1050.0 525.0 1050.0 23.97 3.00 57.437 TF2: .5450 43.8 .425 9.35 540.3 269.7 642.2 642.2 269.7 60.79 .00 118.218 TF1: .2800 48.6 .265 7.38 1051.8 525.0 1250.0 1250.0 525.0 58.47 3.00 122.909 TF1: .1527 45.5 .127 5.11 1928.6 367.5 1400.1 367.5 1400.1 96.89 .00 219.7810 TF2: .1069 30.0 .046 3.07 2754.8 525.0 2000.0 525.0 2000.0 94.72 3.00 223.5511 TF2: .0825 22.8 .024 2.24 3569.6 445.5 2121.2 2121.2 445.5 117.32 .00 340.8812 TF1: .0700 15.2 .013 1.60 4207.0 525.0 2500.0 2500.0 525.0 115.41 3.00 344.39__________________________________________________________________________Mill Entry Exit Roll RMSStand Gauge Temp. Temp. Force Torque Horse Load TimeName in. Deg. F Deg. F lb .times. 10**6 lb-ft .times. 10**6 Power Ratio sec.__________________________________________________________________________FCE: 7.0000 2250.00 2250.00 .0000 .0000 0. .0000 .00TF1: 5.8500 2225.76 2220.18 2.6948 1.2945 15038. 2.2004 28.61TF2: 4.6000 2217.64 2219.82 2.8119 1.3201 19502. 2.2438 29.75TF2: 3.4000 2204.01 2196.48 3.0226 1.3178 16420. 2.2399 47.56TF1: 2.3300 2190.77 2196.72 3.3121 1.2929 23508. 2.1976 45.78TF1: 1.6250 2100.01 2089.67 3.9770 1.2686 18072. 2.1564 119.49TF2: .9700 2084.05 2101.49 4.8244 1.2755 30440. 2.1743 113.34TF2: .5450 2058.06 2074.48 5.3385 1.1238 16403. 1.9101 221.78TF1: .2800 2038.23 2063.77 6.0436 .9815 27885. 1.9918 231.94TF1: .1527 1988.20 2008.94 6.5193 .6983 22221. 1.5872 244.08TF2: .1069 1986.44 1992.88 4.7014 .2783 12651. .9036 77.34TF2: .0825 1904.54 1905.01 4.7312 .1872 9027. .6448 48.78TF1: .0700 1802.94 1799.37 4.4714 .1126 6396. .4569 24.09__________________________________________________________________________Reversing Tandem Mill RMS Production: 121.66 TPHReversing Tandem Mill Peak Production: 190.68 TPHCoiling begins at Pass Number: 6 TF2Tandem Passes begin at Pass Number: 1 TF1Distance Between Cfce #1 and Mill: 35.00 ft.Distance Between Mill and Cfce #2: 35.00 ft.__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE III
A 10 inch thick, 48 inch wide slab of AISI Type 1095 carbon steel is reduced to a 0.0910 inch coil in fourteen passes with coiling beginning following the eighth flat pass.
TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________24.003 tons 1000. PIWRolling Schedule HSM - 48.00 - 10.0000/ .1185 Mill Bite Mill Speed Strip Speed Roll Delay ElapsedPass Stand Gauge % Draft Angle Length FPM FPM Time Time TimeNo. Name in. Red in. Deg. ft. Thread Roll Front Body sec. sec. sec.__________________________________________________________________________0 FCE: 10.0000 .0 .000 .00 29.5 .0 .0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .001 TF1: 8.7000 13.0 1.300 16.39 33.9 446.6 510.3 446.6 510.3 3.98 .00 3.982 TF2: 7.4000 14.9 1.300 16.39 39.8 525.0 600.0 525.0 600.0 3.98 3.00 9.403 TF2: 6.1000 17.6 1.300 16.39 48.3 413.1 472.1 472.1 413.1 6.14 .00 15.534 TF1: 4.8000 21.3 1.300 16.39 61.4 525.0 600.0 600.0 525.0 6.14 3.00 21.155 TFI: 3.5500 26.0 1.250 16.07 83.0 369.7 739.4 369.7 739.4 6.73 .00 27.886 TF2: 2.5000 29.6 1.050 14.72 117.8 525.0 1050.0 525.0 1050.0 6.73 3.00 33.807 TF2: 1.5300 38.8 .970 14.14 192.5 308.8 617.6 617.6 308.8 27.07 .00 60.878 TF1: .9000 41.2 .630 11.39 327.2 525.0 1050.0 1050.0 525.0 25.32 3.00 65.629 TF1: .4900 45.6 .410 9.18 601.0 283.9 838.3 283.9 838.3 55.28 .00 120.9010 TF2: .2650 45.9 .225 6.80 1111.3 525.0 1550.0 525.0 1550.0 52.76 3.00 125.1911 TF2: .1550 41.5 .110 4.75 1900.0 401.4 1414.4 1414.4 401.4 93.86 .00 219.0512 TF1: .1185 23.5 .036 2.74 2485.2 525.0 1850.0 1850.0 525.0 91.93 3.00 222.8113 TF1: .1000 15.6 .019 1.95 2945.0 477.7 1683.5 477.7 1683.5 107.22 .00 330.0314 TF2: .0910 9.0 .009 1.36 3236.3 525.0 1850.0 525.0 1850.0 104.96 .00 330.03__________________________________________________________________________Mill Entry Exit Roll RMSStand Gauge Temp. Temp. Force Torque Horse Load TimeName in. Deg. F Deg. F lb .times. 10**6 lb-ft .times. 10**6 Power Ratio sec.__________________________________________________________________________FCE: 10.0000 2250.00 2250.00 .0000 .0000 0. .0000 .00TF1: 8.7000 2233.52 2230.65 2.9455 1.1122 12901. 1.8905 14.22TF2: 7.4000 2228.90 2231.02 2.9444 1.1118 15162. 1.8898 14.21TF2: 6.1000 2223.40 2218.64 2.9807 1.1255 12077. 1.9131 22.45TF1: 4.8000 2215.76 2218.92 2.9799 1.1252 15344. 1.9125 22.44TF1: 3.5500 2197.47 2194.82 3.0996 1.1473 19281. 1.9501 25.60TF2: 2.5000 2192.27 2199.25 3.1747 1.0753 25662. 1.8330 22.62TF2: 1.5300 2152.23 2162.99 3.9125 1.2708 17839. 2.1600 126.39TF1: .9000 2150.13 2164.66 3.8200 .9946 23736. 1.6954 72.79TF1: .4900 2122.20 2138.42 4.1219 .8576 16340. 1.4577 117.47TF2: .2650 2124.48 2144.50 3.9851 .6028 21235. 1.5168 121.39TF2: .1550 2066.25 2079.02 3.8870 .3972 12769. .9121 78.08TF1: .1185 2000.17 1996.30 2.4799 .1389 5842. .4173 16.01TF1: .1000 1910.11 1896.43 2.0006 .0766 2931. .2094 4.70TF2: .0910 1873.84 1853.88 1.3299 .0342 1436. .1026 1.11__________________________________________________________________________Distance Between Mill and Cfce #2: 35.00 ft. Coiling begins at Pass Number: 8 TF1Reversing Tandem Mill RMS Production: 220.01 TPH Tandem Passes begin at Pass Number: 1 TF1Reversing Tandem Mill Peak Production: 261.83 TPH Distance Between Cfce #1 and Mill: 35.00 ft.__________________________________________________________________________
Having thus described the invention in the detail and particularity required by the Patent Laws, what is desired protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the following claims.
Claims
  • 1. In a method of hot rolling steel slabs of thin to standard thickness into hot mill band on a hot mill having a coiler furnace upstream and downstream of a reversing mill, the improvement comprising utilizing a twin stand hot reversing mill and:
  • a) introducing a slab directly into a first stand of said mill without any breakdown pass;
  • b) flat tandem passing said slab back and forth through said first stand and a second stand to form an intermediate product having a thickness on the other of an inch or less capable of being coiled;
  • c) coiling said intermediate product on one of said upstream or downstream coiling furnaces;
  • d) passing said intermediate product back and forth between said first and second stand in tandem while coiling and decoiling in said upstream and downstream coiler furnaces to form a hot mill band of the desired thickness; and
  • e) removing said hot mill band in one of sheet, plate or coil form from said hot mill.
  • 2. The improvement of claim 1 including utilizing a vertical edger located between the first and second stand and subjecting the intermediate product to edging passes during at least said flat passes.
  • 3. The improvement of claim 1 including producing in excess of 1 million tons annually at a production rate of generally 190 tons per hour and greater.
  • 4. The improvement of claim 1 including producing a product mix of carbon, high strength low alloy, stainless and silicon steels.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 including taking 10 to 14 passes to achieve the hot mill band.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 including 4 to 8 flat passes.
CROSS REFERENCE TO-RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation-in-part of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/371,137, filed on Jan. 11, 1995.

US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
372747 Everson Nov 1887
1964503 Coryell Jun 1934
2025002 McIlvried Dec 1935
2123291 Smitmans Jul 1938
3331232 King Jul 1967
3485077 Wilson Dec 1969
4497191 Langer et al. Feb 1985
4580428 Brettbacher et al. Apr 1986
4745556 Turley May 1988
4793169 Ginzburg Dec 1988
4958677 Kimura Sep 1990
5133205 Rostik et al. Jul 1992
5140837 Thomas et al. Aug 1992
5276952 Thomas et al. Jan 1994
5437089 Salganik et al. Aug 1995
5511303 Tippins et al. Apr 1996
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
178107 Oct 1984 JPX
918005 Feb 1963 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Sendzimir, Michael G., "Hot strip mills for thin slab continuous casting systems", Iron and Steel Engineer, Oct. 1986, pp. 36-43.
Buch, E. et al., "Continuous thin slab casting--direct rolling. Why the planetary hot strip mill?", presented at Iron and Steel Society, Inc., May 1987.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 371137 Jan 1995