1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching)-based multicast routing protocol, more particularly, to a point-to-multipoint traffic routing method that routes a multicast traffic through a determined tree on an MPLS network.
2. Description of the Related Art
An MPLS ensures quality of service (QoS) for a traffic transported through an IP (Internet Protocol) network and efficient use of network resources. Therefore, it is spotlighted in traffic engineering field.
The MPLS traffic engineering determines an LSP (Label Switched Path) in various ways to appropriately accept a variety of QoS demands for users' IP packets. The LSP is a point-to-point (PTP) path connecting from an ingress to an egress edge router.
By the way, due to rapid growth of an IP base network, various multimedia services such as VoIP, VOD, AOD, on-line movie, and video conference are being demanded. Many of those multi-media services require a point-to-multipoint (PTM) tree. If a PTM multimedia service is provided through PTP LSPs, use efficiency of network resources becomes worse and/or management of QoS becomes not easy. This is because multicast traffic is routed through a unicast way.
In the Internet proposal room of the IETF committee, many ways to distribute MPLS label are being listed up. Those many ways use PIM-SM or PIM-DM which is conventional multicast IP protocol. Besides the proposed many ways, MPLS multicasting way is being standardized in the IETF.
However, since tree determining methods of existing multicast protocols proposed until now are all receiver-based, it is not easy to reflect intentions of a service provider or users appropriately. As a result, network resources can not be used efficiently, which results in deterioration of service quality.
To resolve such problems, new traffic path determining methods, which determine traffic paths at an originating node on an MPLS network, have been proposed by this applicant. They have been filed at Korean Intellectual Property Office in Patent Application No. 2001-65798, No. 2001-65799, and No. 2001-65800, respectively on Oct. 24, 2001 altogether.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of routing forward and backward traffic on a multicast traffic tree determined for a PTM traffic at an originating node of an MPLS network.
A node conducting a method of routing a point-to-multipoint traffic on an MPLS network in accordance with the present invention receives a message with an object including topology information on a determined tree, determines whether itself is a copy node or not based on the topology information, and copies, if determined to be a copy node, the received message to transmit to at least two nodes specified as next by the topology information.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, illustrate the preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
In the drawings:
In order that the invention may be fully understood, a preferred embodiment thereof will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In this specification, a tree means a collection of paths from an originating point, namely, an ingress to several destination points, namely, egresses. A term of ‘tree’ is also called ‘LST’ (Label Switched Tree) afterward.
The first LST ‘LST1’, drawn as thick sold line, is a tree of Ingress→LSR2→LSR5→Egress1,2,3 and the second LST ‘LST2’ or the backup tree ‘BT’, drawn as thick dotted line, is a tree of Ingress→via LSRs→Egress1,2,3. Every LST is determined by the ingress LER as aforementioned when routing of a multicast traffic is demanded.
As shown in
The present invention defines an MMRP (MPLS-based Multicast Routing Protocol) for routing a multicast traffic through trees determined as illustrated.
Namely, the present invention relates to a protocol for the tree ‘LST1’ if a single tree is set-up for multicasting, for the trees ‘LST1’ and ‘LST2’ if two trees are used, and for a single tree ‘LST1’ and a single backup tree ‘BT’ if a tree and a backup tree are set-up, respectively.
The MPATH message further includes an MRO (Multicast Route Object) defined as
When the MPATH message is transmitted along a setup tree in downstream direction, namely in forward direction, junction nodes (called ‘copy node’ or ‘branch node’) 2 and 3 copy a received message individually. The junction nodes (called ‘merge node’) 2 and 3 merge the MRESV message transmitted in upstream direction, namely in backward direction. Comparing
As aforementioned, the MPATH message includes objects of a PATH message defined by RSVP-TE as well as a new object ‘MRO’ defined as in
The MRO of
When a message containing topology information like
In the same manner, the node 3 copies the received MPATH message to the next nodes 4 and 5.
When copying the received message, the node 2 or 3 may delete partial information related with previous nodes from topology information written in MRO. This operation is an additional burden on a node, however, the size of message to be transmitted becomes smaller.
After the node 2 or 3 copies and transmits the MPATH message, it measures an elapsing time until the MRESV with an MRRO of
The merge node 2 or 3 of
The MRRO of
The above-explained PTM traffic routing method on an MPLS network has extended an RSVP-TE protocol, which is under standardization by IETF, to route forward and backward multicast traffic via a traffic tree determined for multicasting, whereby, operations of a copy and a merge node as well as an overall routing process can be smoothly conducted.
The detailed description of the invention has been directed to certain exemplary embodiments, various modifications of these embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, will be suggested to those skilled in the art. The invention encompasses any modifications or alternative embodiments that fall within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2001-0074381 | Nov 2001 | KR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4740954 | Cotton et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5490143 | Hara et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
6034961 | Masuo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6148000 | Feldman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6336129 | Ise et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374303 | Armitage et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6529958 | Oba et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563793 | Golden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6631128 | Lemieux | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6778531 | Kodialam et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6862288 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879594 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6901048 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904018 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6947434 | Hundscheidt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6985960 | Takashima et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20020054405 | Guo et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030037276 | Mo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030099235 A1 | May 2003 | US |