Method of self-synchronization of configurable elements of a programmable unit

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6526520
  • Patent Number
    6,526,520
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 29, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 25, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of synchronizing and reconfiguring configurable elements in a programmable unit is provided. A unit has a two- or multi-dimensional, programmable cell architecture (e.g., DFP, DPGA, etc.), and any configurable element can have access to a configuration register and a status register of the other configurable elements via an interconnection architecture and can thus have an active influence on their function and operation. By making synchronization the responsibility of each element, more synchronization tasks can be performed at the same time because independent elements no longer interfere with each other in accessing a central synchronization instance.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a method of synchronization and reconfiguration of configurable elements in a programmable unit.




BACKGROUND INFORMATION




Synchronization of configurable elements in conventional units (e.g., FPGAs, DPGAs, etc.) is usually based on the clock pulse of the unit. This type of time-controlled synchronization poses many problems. One problem is that the amount of time a task will require is often not known until a final result is achieved. Another problem with time-controlled synchronization is that the event upon which the synchronization occurs is triggered by an independent element instead of the element to be synchronized itself. In this case, two different elements are involved in the synchronization which leads to high management overhead.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a method for synchronization based on the elements to be synchronized themselves. In accordance to an exemplary embodiment according to the present invention, synchronization is no longer implemented or administered by a central instance. By making synchronization the responsibility of each element, more synchronization tasks can be performed at the same time because independent elements no longer interfere with each other in accessing the central synchronization instance.




In a unit with a two- or multi-dimensional, programmable cell architecture (e.g., DFP, DPGA, etc.), any configurable element can have access to the configuration and status register of the other configurable elements via an interconnection architecture and can thus have an active influence on their function and operation. Thus, in addition to the usual method, the configuration may also take place from a processing array (see PACT02: PA) through a primary logic unit.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows an exemplary loop construct implemented using triggers in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 2

shows an exemplary comparator construct implemented using multiple triggers in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 3

shows an exemplary comparator construct with multiple outputs implemented by using multiple triggers and interleaving them in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 4

shows exemplary extensions in comparison with a device from PACT02.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention includes a run-time programmable, run-time reconfigurable unit. The configurable elements on the chip have one or more configuration registers for different tasks. Read and write access to these configuration registers may be provided. In describing the present invention, it is assumed that a configuration can be set in an element to be configured for the following information:




Interconnection register. The type of connection with other cells is set in this register.




Command register. The function to be carried out by the configurable element is entered in this register.




Status register. The cell stores its current status in this register. This status provides information to the other elements of the component regarding which processing cycle the cell is in.




A cell is configured by a command which determines the function of the cell that is to be carried out. In addition, configuration data are entered to set the interconnection with other cells and the contents of the status register. The cell is then ready for operation after this procedure.




To permit a flexible and dynamic interaction of multiple cells, each cell can have read or write access to all the configuration registers of another cell. The type of command with which a specific cell has been configured will determine to which of the many configuration registers the cell has read or write access. Each command that can be executed by the cell exists in as many different modes of address as there are different independent configuration registers in an element to be configured.




For example, assume that a cell has the configuration registers indicated above (i.e., interconnection, command and status) and is set to execute an ADD command, which performs addition. Through the various types of ADD commands, the present invention allows a selection of where the result of this function is to be transferred. The following are examples of some possibilities:




ADD-A. The result is transmitted to operand register A of the target cell.




ADD-B. The result is transmitted to operand register B of the target cell.




ADD-V. The result is transmitted to the interconnect register of the target cell.




ADD-S. The result is transmitted to the status register of the target cell.




ADD-C. The result is transmitted to the command register of the target cell.




In addition to generating the result, each cell can also generate a number of trigger signals. The trigger signals need not necessarily be transmitted to the same target cell that receives the result of processing the configured command. One trigger signal or a combination of multiple trigger signals triggers a certain action in the target cell or puts the cell in a certain status. A description of the states can be found in the following text. The following are some exemplary trigger signals:




GO trigger. The GO trigger puts the target cell in a READY status.




RECONFIG trigger. The RECONFIG trigger sets the target cell in a RECONFIG status, so that the cell can be reprogrammed. This trigger is especially appropriate in conjunction with switching tables. If it is assumed that the data to be processed is loaded into the operand registers at the rising edge of the clock pulse, processed in the period of the H level, and written to the output register at the trailing edge, then reconfiguration of the cell is possible at the trailing edge. The new configuration data is written to the command register at the trailing edge. The period of the L level is sufficient to successfully conclude the reconfiguration.




STEP trigger. The STEP trigger triggers a single execution of the configured command by the target cell that is in a WAIT status.




STOP trigger. The STOP trigger stops the target cell by setting the cell in a STOP status.




The ability to indicate, in the processing cell, which register of the target cell the result is to be entered and which type of trigger signal is to be generated, a quantity of management data can be generated from a data stream. This management data is not a result of the actual task to be processed by the chip, but instead serves only the function of management (e.g., synchronization, optimization, etc.) of the internal status.




Each cell can assume the following states, which are represented by appropriate coding in the status register:




READY. The cell has been configured with a valid command and can process data. Processing takes place with each clock cycle. The data is entered into the register of the target cell on the basis of the addressing type of the cell sending the data.




WAIT. The cell has been configured with a valid command and can process data. Processing takes place in part on the basis of a trigger signal which can be generated by other elements of the unit. The data is entered into the register of the target cell on the basis of the addressing type of the cell sending the data.




CONFIG. The cell has not been configured with a valid command. The data packet which is sent to the cell with the next clock cycle is entered into the command register. The data packet is entered into the command register, regardless of which addressing type has been used by the cell sending the data.




CONFIG WAIT. The cell has not been configured with a valid command. A data packet is entered with the next trigger signal which can be generated by other elements of the unit and can be written to the command register. The data packet is entered into the command register, regardless of which addressing type has been used by the cell sending the data.




RECONFIG. The cell has been configured with a valid command, but it is not processing any data at the moment. The data is accepted by the cell (transferred to the input register) but is not processed further.




STOP. The cell is configured with a valid command, processed, but with no data so far. The data is received by the cell (transmitted to the input register) but not further processed.




Due to these various states and the possibility of read and write access to the various registers of the other cells, each cell can assume an active management role. In contrast, conventional units of this type have a central management instance which must always know and handle the overall status of the unit.




To achieve greater flexibility, there is another class of commands which change in type after the first execution. Using the example of the ADD command, the command may have the following format:




ADD-C-A. The result of the ADD function is written to the command register of the target cell with the first execution of the command. With each subsequent execution, the result is written to operand register A.




This possibility can be expanded as much as desired, so that commands of the type ADD-C-V-A-C- . . . B are also conceivable. Each command can assume all permutated combinations of the different addressing and triggering types.




The following are hardware expansions that may be required to implement an exemplary embodiment according to the present invention using a base device described in PACT02. In addition, a complete illustration of the necessary hardware is also provided in FIG.


4


.




Additional Registers




A status register and a configuration register are added to the registers described in PACT02. Both registers are triggered by the PLU bus and have a connection to the state machine of the SM UNIT (PACT02, FIG.


2


:


0213


).




Change in the PLU Bus




In PACT02, the configurable registers M/F-PLUREG are managed exclusively over the PLU bus (PACT02, FIG.


2


:


0210


). To ensure the functional capabilities provided by the present invention, there must also be an additional possibility of access through the normal system bus (PACT02, FIG.


2


:


0201


). The same thing is true of the new status and configuration registers.




Only the part of the system bus that is interconnected with the PAE over the BM UNIT (PACT02, FIG.


2


:


0210


) is relevant for the registers. Therefore, the bus is relayed from the BM UNIT to the registers, where upstream multiplexers or upstream gates assume the switching between the PLU bus and the system bus relevant for the PAE.




The multiplexers or gates are wired so that they always switch through the system bus relevant for the PAE except after a reset of the unit (RESET) or when the ReConfig signal (PACT02, FIG.


3


:


0306


) is active.




Expansion of the System Bus




The system bus (PACT02, FIG.


2


:


0201


) is expanded to the extent that the information about the target register is transmitted together with the data. This means that an address which selects the desired register at the data receiver is also sent at the same time.




In the example shown in

FIG. 1

, macro


0103


will be executed 70 times. A single execution of the macro


0103


requires 26 clock cycles. This means that counter


0101


may be decremented by one only once in every 26 clock cycles. One problem with freely programmable units is that it is not always possible to guarantee that the execution of macro


0103


will actually be concluded after 26 clock cycles. A delay can occur, for example, due to the fact that a macro which is supposed to deliver input data for macro


0103


suddenly needs ten clock cycles longer. For this reason, the cell in macro


0103


sends a trigger signal to counter


0101


which determines when the result of the computation is sent to another macro. At the same time, processing of macro


0103


is stopped by the same cell. This cell “knows” exactly when the condition for termination of a computation has been reached.




The trigger signal sent in this case is a STEP trigger which causes counter


0101


to execute its configured function once. The counter decrements its count by one and compares whether it has reached the value zero. If this is not the case, a GO trigger is sent to macro


0103


. This GO trigger signal causes macro


0103


to resume its function again.




This process is repeated until counter


0101


has reached a value of zero. Then a trigger signal is sent to macro


0102


, where it triggers a function.




A very precise synchronization can be achieved by this interaction of triggers.





FIG. 2

is similar to

FIG. 1

except, in this case, the function in element


0202


is not a counter but a comparator. Macro


0201


sends a comparison value to comparator


0202


after each processing run. Depending on the output of the comparison, different triggers are again activated to, for example, cause an action in macros


0203


. The construct shown in

FIG. 2

corresponds to that of an IF query in a conventional program language.




In

FIG. 3

, several comparators


0301


,


0302


are implemented in a construction of an IF-ELSE-ELSE construct (or a multiple choice). By using various types of triggers and connections of these triggers to macros


0303


,


0304


, a very complex sequences can be easily implemented.





FIG. 4

shows the differences in

FIG. 2

in comparison with PACT02 with the differences shown with shading. The configuration register


0401


and the status register


0402


are connected to the SM UNIT over the bus


0407


. Registers


0401


,


0402


, F- and M-PLUREG are connected to a gate


0403


over an internal bus


0206


that connects the internal bus


0406


to the PLU bus


0405


(e.g., to permit configuration by the PLU), or to the BM UNIT over a bus


0408


. Depending on the addressing on data bus


0404


, the BM unit relays the data to the O-REG or to the addressed register


0401


,


0402


, F- or M-PLUREG.




GLOSSARY OF TERMS




Definition of Terms




BM UNIT: Unit for sending data on the bus systems outside the PAE. The data is sent over multiplexers for the data inputs and gates for the data outputs. OACK lines are implemented as open-collector drivers. The BM UNIT is controlled by the M-PLUREG.




Data receiver: The unit(s) that further process(es) the results of the PAE.




Data transmitter: The unit(s) that make(s) data available for the PAE as operands.




Data string: A data string consists of a bit sequence of any length. This bit sequence is a processing unit for a system. Commands for processors and similar units as well as strictly data can be coded in a data string.




DFP: Data flow processor according to (unexamined) German Patent Application DE 44 16 881.




DPGA: Dynamically programmable gate array. Known.




EALU: Expanded arithmetic and logic unit. An ALU that has been expanded by adding special functions that are needed or appropriate for operation of a data processing system according to German Patent Application DE 441 16 881 A1. These are counters in particular.




Elements: Collective term for all types of self-contained units which are used as one piece in an electronic unit. Elements are thus:




Configurable cells of all types




Clusters




RAM blocks




Logic units




ALUs




Registers




Multiplexers




I/O pins of a chip




Event: An event can be analyzed by a hardware element in any appropriate manner for the application and it can trigger a conditional action as a response to this analysis. Events are thus, for example:




Clock cycle of a data processing system,




Internal or external interrupt signal,




Trigger signal from other elements within the unit,




Comparison of a data stream and/or a command stream with a value,




Input/output events,




Running, overrunning, resetting, etc. a counter,




Analysis of a comparison.




FPGA: Field-programmable gate array. Known.




F-PLUREG: Register in which the function of the PAEs is set. Likewise, the one-shot and sleep modes are set. The PLU writes into the register.




H level: Logic 1 level, depending on the technology used.




Configurable element: A configurable element is an element of a logic unit which can be set by a configuration string for a specific function. Configurable elements are thus all types of RAM cells, multiplexers, arithmetic and logic units, registers and all types of internal and external interconnection description, etc.




Configurable cell: See logic cells.




Configure: Setting the function and interconnection of a logic unit, a (FPGA) cell or a PAE (see reconfigure).




Configuration data: Any quantity of configuration strings.




Configuration memory: The configuration memory contains one or more configuration strings.




Configuration string: A configuration string consists of a bit sequence of any length. This bit sequence represents a valid setting for the element to be configured, so the result is a functional unit.




Primary logic unit: Unit for configuring and reconfiguring the PAE. Embodied by a microcontroller adapted specifically to its task.




Logic cells: Configurable cells used in DFPs, FPGAs, DPGAs which fulfill simple logical or arithmetic tasks according to their configuration.




L level: Logic 0 level, depending on the technology used.




M-PLUREG: Register in which the interconnection of the PAEs is set. The register is written by the PLU.




O-REG: Operand register for storing the operands of the EALU. Permits chronological and functional independence of the PAEs from the data transmitters. This simplifies the transfer of data because it can take place asynchronously or packet-oriented. At the same time, this creates the possibility of reconfiguring the data transmitters independently of the PAEs or reconfiguring the PAEs independently of the data transmitters.




PLU: Unit for configuring and reconfiguring the PAEs. Embodied by a microcontroller adapted specifically to its function.




SM UNIT: State machine UNIT. State machine that controls an EALU.




Switching table: A switching table is a ring memory which is addressed by a control. The entries in a switching table may contain any configuration strings. The control can execute commands. The switching table responds to trigger signals and reconfigures the configurable elements on the basis of an entry in a ring memory.




Reconfigure: Reconfiguring any quantity of PAEs while any remaining quantity of PAEs continue their own functions (see configure).




Processing cycle: A processing cycle describes the period of time needed by a unit to go from a defined and/or valid state to the next defined and/or valid state.




Cells: Synonym for configurable elements.




Naming conventions




Subassembly:UNIT




Operating mode:MODE




Multiplexer:MUX




Negated signal:not




Register for PLU visible: PLUREG




Register internal:REG




Shift registers: sft















Function conventions











AND function &













A




B




Q









0




0




0






0




1




0






1




0




0






1




1




1














OR function #













A




B




Q









0




0




0






0




1




1






1




0




1






1




1




1














NOT function !














A




Q











0




1







1




0















GATE function G













EN




D




Q









0




0











0




1











1




0




0






1




1




1













Claims
  • 1. A method for processing data by a data processor, the data processor including a plurality of cells arranged in a multi-dimensional pattern, comprising the steps of:storing result data by a first cell of the plurality of cells into a register of a second cell of the plurality of cells; transmitting a first trigger signal by the first cell to the second cell, the first trigger signal having a type; receiving the first trigger signal by the second cell; and processing the stored result data by the second cell in response to receiving the first trigger signal, the way in which the stored result data is processed by the second cell varying as a function of the type of the first trigger signal.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:storing command data by the first cell into a command register of a third cell of the plurality of cells; transmitting a second trigger signal by the first cell to the third cell; receiving the second trigger signal by the third cell; and executing the stored command by the third cell.
  • 3. The method for processing data by a data processor of claim 2, whereinthe second trigger signal has a type and the way the stored command is executed by the third cell varies as a function of the type of the second trigger signal.
  • 4. The method for processing data by a data processor of claim 2, further comprising:performing a computing operation with the first cell of the plurality of cells; and determining the type for the second trigger signal as a function of a result of the computing operation performed with the first cell of the plurality of cells.
  • 5. The method for processing data by a data processor of claim 1, further comprising:performing a computing operation with the first cell of the plurality of cells; and determining the type for the first trigger signal as a function of a result of the computing operation performed with the first cell of the plurality of cells.
  • 6. The method for processing data by a data processor of claim 5, whereinthe type of the first trigger signal indicates that the second cell should process the result data in a single step mode, and wherein processing the stored result data by the second cell is carried out in the single step mode.
  • 7. A data processor, comprising:a plurality of cells arranged in a multi-dimensional pattern, each of the plurality of cells including at least one respective register, each of the plurality of cells including a respective logic unit configured to perform a computer operation producing a result, and a respective configuration register, each of the plurality of cells capable of storing the result in the respective configuration register of at least one of the other plurality of cells.
  • 8. The data processor according to claim 7, wherein each of the plurality of cells selectively transmits trigger signals to the at least one of the other plurality of cells.
  • 9. The data processor according to claim 7, wherein the at least one of the other plurality of cells are selectively responsive to the trigger signals.
  • 10. The data processor of claim 7, whereineach of the plurality of cells further includes a respective status register, and each of the plurality of cells is capable of storing the result in the respective status register of at least one of the other plurality of cells.
  • 11. The data processor of claim 7, whereineach of the plurality of cells further includes a respective command register, and each of the plurality of cells is capable of storing the result in the respective command register of at least one of the other plurality of cells.
  • 12. The data processor of claim 11, whereinthe computer operation which the respective logic unit is configured to perform is determined by a value stored in the respective command register.
  • 13. The data processor of claim 7, whereineach of the plurality of cells further includes a respective operand register, and each of the plurality of cells is capable of storing the result in the respective operand register of at least one of the other plurality of cells.
  • 14. The data processor of claim 13, whereinthe computer operation which the respective logic unit is configured to perform is performed on a value stored in the respective operand register.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
197 04 728 Feb 1997 DE
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a division of U.S. Ser. No. 08/946,812, filed Oct. 8, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,081,903.

US Referenced Citations (131)
Number Name Date Kind
4591979 Iwashita May 1986 A
4706216 Carter Nov 1987 A
4739474 Holsztynski et al. Apr 1988 A
4761755 Ardini et al. Aug 1988 A
4811214 Nosenchuck et al. Mar 1989 A
4852048 Moton Jul 1989 A
4870302 Freeman Sep 1989 A
4901268 Judd Feb 1990 A
4967340 Dawes Oct 1990 A
5014193 Garner et al. May 1991 A
5015884 Agrawal et al. May 1991 A
5021947 Campbell et al. Jun 1991 A
5023775 Poret Jun 1991 A
5043978 Nagler et al. Aug 1991 A
5081375 Pickett et al. Jan 1992 A
5109503 Cruickshank et al. Apr 1992 A
5113498 Evan et al. May 1992 A
5115510 Okamoto et al. May 1992 A
5123109 Hillis Jun 1992 A
5125801 Nabity et al. Jun 1992 A
5128559 Steele Jul 1992 A
5142469 Weisenborn Aug 1992 A
5204935 Mihara et al. Apr 1993 A
5208491 Ebeling et al. May 1993 A
5226122 Thayer et al. Jul 1993 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5233539 Agrawal et al. Aug 1993 A
5247689 Ewert Sep 1993 A
5287472 Horst Feb 1994 A
5301284 Estes et al. Apr 1994 A
5301344 Kolchinsky Apr 1994 A
5303172 Magar et al. Apr 1994 A
5336950 Popli et al. Aug 1994 A
5347639 Rechtschaffen et al. Sep 1994 A
5361373 Gilson Nov 1994 A
5410723 Schmidt et al. Apr 1995 A
5418952 Morley et al. May 1995 A
5421019 Holsztynski et al. May 1995 A
5422823 Agrawal et al. Jun 1995 A
5426378 Ong Jun 1995 A
5430687 Hung et al. Jul 1995 A
5440245 Galbraith et al. Aug 1995 A
5440538 Olsen et al. Aug 1995 A
5442790 Nosenchuck Aug 1995 A
5444394 Watson et al. Aug 1995 A
5448186 Kawata Sep 1995 A
5455525 Ho et al. Oct 1995 A
5457644 McCollum Oct 1995 A
5465375 Thepaut et al. Nov 1995 A
5473266 Ahanin et al. Dec 1995 A
5473267 Stansfield Dec 1995 A
5475583 Bock et al. Dec 1995 A
5475803 Stearns et al. Dec 1995 A
5475856 Kogge Dec 1995 A
5483620 Pechanek et al. Jan 1996 A
5485103 Pedersen et al. Jan 1996 A
5485104 Agrawal et al. Jan 1996 A
5489857 Agrawal et al. Feb 1996 A
5491353 Kean Feb 1996 A
5493239 Zlotnick Feb 1996 A
5497498 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5506998 Kato et al. Apr 1996 A
5510730 El Gamal et al. Apr 1996 A
5511173 Yamaura et al. Apr 1996 A
5513366 Agarwal et al. Apr 1996 A
5521837 Frankie et al. May 1996 A
5522083 Gove et al. May 1996 A
5532693 Winters et al. Jul 1996 A
5532957 Malhi Jul 1996 A
5535406 Kolchinsky Jul 1996 A
5537057 Leong et al. Jul 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5541530 Cliff et al. Jul 1996 A
5544336 Kato et al. Aug 1996 A
5548773 Kemney et al. Aug 1996 A
5555434 Carlstedt Sep 1996 A
5559450 Ngai et al. Sep 1996 A
5561738 Kinerk et al. Oct 1996 A
5570040 Lytle et al. Oct 1996 A
5583450 Trimberger et al. Dec 1996 A
5586044 Agrawal et al. Dec 1996 A
5587921 Agrawal et al. Dec 1996 A
5588152 Dapp et al. Dec 1996 A
5590345 Barker et al. Dec 1996 A
5590348 Barker et al. Dec 1996 A
5596742 Agarwal et al. Jan 1997 A
5617547 Feeney et al. Apr 1997 A
5634131 Matter et al. May 1997 A
5649176 Selvidge et al. Jul 1997 A
5652894 Hu et al. Jul 1997 A
5655124 Lin Aug 1997 A
5659797 Zandveld et al. Aug 1997 A
5713037 Wilkinson et al. Jan 1998 A
5717943 Barker et al. Feb 1998 A
5734921 Dapp et al. Mar 1998 A
5742180 Detton Apr 1998 A
5748872 Norman May 1998 A
5754871 Wilkinson et al. May 1998 A
5761484 Agarwal et al. Jun 1998 A
5778439 Trimberger et al. Jul 1998 A
5794059 Barker et al. Aug 1998 A
5801715 Norman Sep 1998 A
5828858 Athanas et al. Oct 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5844888 Markkula Dec 1998 A
5854918 Baxter Dec 1998 A
5867691 Shiraishi Feb 1999 A
5892961 Trimberger et al. Apr 1999 A
5915123 Mirsky et al. Jun 1999 A
5927423 Wada et al. Jul 1999 A
5936424 Young et al. Aug 1999 A
5965518 DeHon et al. Oct 1999 A
6014509 Furtek et al. Apr 2000 A
6052773 DeHon et al. Apr 2000 A
6034538 Abramovici May 2000 A
6081903 Vorbach et al. Jun 2000 A
6054873 Laramic Aug 2000 A
6108760 Mirsky et al. Aug 2000 A
6122719 Mirsky et al. Sep 2000 A
6127908 Bozler et al. Oct 2000 A
6202182 Abramovici et al. May 2001 B1
6243808 Wang Jun 2001 B1
6282627 Wong et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288566 Hanrahan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6311200 Hanrahan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6341318 Dakhil Jan 2002 B1
6347346 Taylor Feb 2002 B1
6349346 Hanrahan et al. Feb 2002 B1
6370596 Dakhil Apr 2002 B1
6389579 Phillips et al. May 2002 B1
6392912 Hanrahan et al. May 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
4416881.0 Nov 1994 DE
19654595 Jul 1998 DE
19654846 Jul 1998 DE
19704728 Aug 1998 DE
19651075 Oct 1998 DE
0 221 360 May 1987 EP
0428327 May 1991 EP
0748051 Dec 1991 EP
748 051 Dec 1991 EP
0539595 May 1993 EP
0 678 985 Oct 1995 EP
0 726 532 Aug 1996 EP
0735685 Oct 1996 EP
735 685 Oct 1996 EP
726532 Aug 2000 EP
A9004835 May 1990 WO
WO9011648 Oct 1990 WO
A9311503 Jun 1993 WO
9408399 Apr 1994 WO
9500161 Jan 1995 WO
9526001 Sep 1995 WO
0707269 Apr 1996 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Norman, Richard S., Hyperchip Business Summary, The Opportunity, Jan. 31, 2000, pp. 1-3.
Villasenor, John, et al., “Configurable Computing.” Scientific American, vol. 276, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 66-71.
Villasenor, John, et al., “Configurable Computing Solutions for Automatic Target Recognition,” IEEE, 1996 pp. 70-79.
Tau, Edward, et al., “A First Generation DPGA Implementation,” FPD'95, pp. 138-143.
Athanas, Peter, et al., “IEEE Symposium on FPGAs For Custom Computing Machines,” IEEE Computer Society Press, Apr. 19-21, 1995, pp. i-vii, 1-222.
Bittner, Ray, A., Jr., “Wormhole Run-Time Reconfiguration: Conceptualization and VLSI Design of a High Performance Computing system,” Dissertation, Jan. 23, 1997, pp. i-xx, 1-415.
Myers, G., Advances in Computer Architecture, Wiley-Interscience Publication, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 463-494, 1978.
M. Saleeba, “A Self-Contained Dynamically Reconfigurable Processor Architecture”, Sixteenth Australian Computer Science Conference, ASCS-16, QLD, Australia, Feb., 1993.
M. Morris Mano, “Digital Design,” by Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, 1984, pp. 119-125, 154-161.
Maxfield, C. “Logic that Mutates While-U-Wait” EDN (Bur. Ed) (USA), EDN (European Edition), Nov. 7, 1996, Cahners Publishing, USA.