Method Of Serving A Slushy Drink And A Product For Use In Such

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080085342
  • Publication Number
    20080085342
  • Date Filed
    June 20, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 10, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
An improved method of serving a slushy drink is provided wherein a manufactured slush is filled into a container (I) to occupy at least 70% of the volume of the container and then hardened to produce a frozen product in the container. The frozen product is then transported through a cold chain to a retail outlet. Following warming to a temperature of between −14 and −5° C., the frozen product is transformed into the slushy drink, preferably by deforming the container.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1
a is a frontal elevation of a container for use in an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 1
b is a sectional side elevation of the container of FIG. 1a;



FIG. 2
a is an elevation of a container for use in a further embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2
b is a sectional elevation of the container of FIG. 2a;



FIG. 3
a is a sectional view of a size-reduction device comprising parallel plates for use in an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3
b is a plan view of the fixed (bottom) plate of the size-reduction device of FIG. 3a; and



FIG. 3
c is a plan view of the rotating (top) plate of the size-reduction device of FIG. 3a.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention will now be described with reference to the following non-limiting examples.


EXAMPLE 1

In this example, various modes of transforming a frozen product into a slushy drink were evaluated. Four modes of transformation were evaluated: stirring, shaking, squeezing and kneading.


Containers

The containers used for the stirring tests were simple plastic cups (PET high-clarity tumblers supplied by Huhtamaki, Ronsberg, Germany) having a brim full capacity of 290 ml. These containers are referred to as Container A.



FIGS. 1
a and 1b show a container (1) similar to those used for the kneading tests. The container (1) comprises a flexible pouch or tube (2) forming a wall delimiting a cavity (6). The pouch (2) is in sealing engagement with a spout (5) which has a product outlet (3) in fluid communication with the cavity (6) and is threaded (4) to receive a sealing cap (not shown). The containers used in the tests were flexible LDPE tubes as used for applying Vanish™ stain remover gel (Reckitt Benckiser, Mannheim, Germany) and having a brim full capacity of 235 ml. These containers are referred to as Container B.



FIGS. 2
a and 2b show a container (101) similar to those used for both the shaking and squeezing tests. The container (101) comprises a blow-moulded plastic bottle (102) which is substantially circular in cross-section and forms a wall delimiting a cavity (106). The bottle (102) has a cylindrical spout (105) which comprises a product outlet (103) in fluid communication with the cavity (106) and is threaded (104) to receive a sealing cap (not shown). The spout (105) is integral with the top section (107) of the bottle which comprises a bulbous portion (107a) coaxial with and extending upwards from a frusto-conical section (107b). Coaxial with the top section (107) is a bowl-shaped end section (108) and extending there-between a tubular first section (109). For the squeezing tests the containers used were flexible PET bottles having a brim full capacity of 270 ml. These containers are referred to as Container C. For the shaking tests, four types of PET bottle were used having brim full capacities of 316, 347, 396, and 526 ml. These containers are referred to as Container D1, D2, D3 and D4 respectively.


Formulations

All concentrations are given on a w/w basis.


Specialist materials were as follows:

    • Xanthan gum was Keltrol™ supplied by CP Kelco (Lille Skensved, Denmark) and had a moisture level of less than 14%.
    • Low Fructose Corn Syrup was C*TruSweet 017Y4, had a moisture level of 22%, a DE of 63 and was supplied by Cerester, Manchester, UK.


A peach tea flavoured frozen product was prepared by combining a syrup with ice particles. The formulations of the syrup and the final frozen product are given in Table I.












TABLE I







Syrup
Frozen Product




















Low Fructose Corn Syrup (%)
26.00
13.00



Dextrose Monohydrate (%)
28.00
14.00



Xanthan gum (%)
0.30
0.15



Citric Acid (%)
1.20
0.60



Malic Acid (%)
0.20
0.10



Peach Flavour (%)
0.90
0.45



Tea Solids (%)
0.14
0.07



Water (%)
43.26
71.63



FPDS (%)
45.7
22.9



<M>n (g mol−1)
216
216










Preparation of Syrup

All ingredients except for the flavour and acids were combined in an agitated heated mix tank and subjected to high shear mixing at a temperature of 65° C. for 2 minutes. The resulting mix was then passed through a homogeniser at 150 bar and 70° C. followed by pasteurisation at 83° C. for 20 s and rapid cooling to 4° C. using a plate heat exchanger. The flavour and acids were then added to the mix and the resulting syrup held at 4° C. in an agitated tank for a period of around 4 hours prior to freezing.


Preparation of Ice Particles

A Ziegra Micro Ice machine (ZIEGRA-Eismaschinen GmbH, Isernhagen, Germany) was used to manufacture ice particles measuring approximately 5×5×2-7 mm.


Manufacture of Slush

The syrup was frozen using a typical ice cream freezer (scraped surface heat exchanger) operating with an open dasher (series 80), a mix flow rate of 120 1/hour, an extrusion temperature of −14° C. and an overrun at the freezer outlet of less than 10%.


Immediately upon exit from the freezer, the ice particles were fed into the stream of frozen syrup using a fruit feeder (star wheel or vane type) to form a slush. The rate of addition of ice particles was controlled such that the syrup:particle ratio was 1:1 (i.e. 50% ice particles by total weight of slush).


The slush was then passed through a size-reduction device. The size-reduction device (10) is schematically illustrated in FIGS. 3a to 3c and comprises the drive (20) and casing (11) of a centrifugal pump (APV Puma pump supplied by Invensys APV, Crawley, UK).


The generally cylindrical casing (11) has a tubular outlet (13) disposed at its edge and has a tubular inlet (12) located centrally in its base. Opposite the inlet (12) and located in the centre of the top of the casing (11) is an aperture (14) for receiving the drive shaft (20) of the centrifugal pump. The drive shaft (20) is in sealing engagement with the casing (11) owing to the presence of an annular seal (14a) located there between.


Located within the casing (11) is a pair of parallel plates (15, 25), being coaxially aligned with the casing (11) and spaced longitudinally from each other by a distance, d. The lower plate (15) is fixedly attached to the base of the casing (11) whilst the upper plate (25) is fixedly attached to the drive shaft (20). By means of its attachment to the drive shaft (20) the upper plate (25) is rotatable relative to the casing (11). In contrast, the lower plate (15) is stationary owing to its attachment to the casing (11).


The lower plate (15) comprises a disc (16) having a central aperture (18) there through which is in fluid communication with the inlet (12) of the casing (11). The whole of the bottom surface of the disc (16) is flat and in contact with the base of the casing (11). The top surface of the disc (16) tapers radially inwards towards the central aperture (18). Projecting upwards from the top surface of the disc (16) are a plurality, for example four, fins (17) spaced regularly around the circumference of the plate (15). Each fin (17) has an upper surface that extends radially inward from, and remains at a height level with, the outer edge of the top surface of the disc (16).


The upper plate (25) is similar to the lower plate (15) but inverted such that it is the top surface of the disc (26) that is flat and the bottom surface tapered. The central aperture of the disc (26) of the upper plate receives the drive shaft (20) and the top surface of the disc (26) is slightly spaced longitudinally from the top of the casing (11) to allow the plate (25) to rotate freely. The top plate (25) may be provided with a different arrangement of fins to the lower plate (15) and in this case the upper plate (25) has three fins (27) whilst the lower (15) has four fins (17).


The size-reduction device (10) is arranged such that slush pumped in through the inlet (12) is required to pass between the parallel plates (15, 25) before it can exit through the outlet (13). The narrow spacing (d) of the plates along with the grinding action of the fins (27) on the rotating top plate (25) against the fins (17) of the bottom plate (15) ensures that the ice particles passing through the device have a maximum length of less than d in at least one dimension.


In this example the size-reduction device had a constriction size, d, of 2.5 mm.


Following size-reduction, the slush was dosed into containers in the quantities given in Table II. At the dosing stage the slush had a temperature of about −6° C. The containers were then capped and placed in a blast freezer (−35° C.) for around four hours wherein the slush hardened to form the frozen product.












TABLE II






Brim full Capacity
Fill Volume
Fill Volume


Container
(ml)
(ml)
(% of brim full)







A
290
233
81


B
235
191
81


C
270
229
85


D1
316
238
75


D2
347
229
66


D3
396
238
60


D4
526
241
46









Storage

The frozen products in the containers were stored at a temperature of −25° C. for approximately one week following removal from the blast freezer. This is similar to the temperature that would be employed when transporting commercial samples from the hardening location to a retail outlet.


Tempering

The frozen products in the containers were tempered to −10° C. by storage for 24 hours in a freezer cabinet operating at −10° C.


Transformation Tests

Each frozen product was removed from the −10° C. cabinet into a room having an ambient temperature of +20° C. and immediately tested. The test duration was 60 s, at which time a straw was inserted into the centre of the product and drinkability assessed on a scale of 1 to 7, wherein a score of 1 represented very difficult, 4 represented drinkable and 7 represented very easy to drink. The tests were as follows:


STIRRING: The cap was removed from the cup and a straw forced into the frozen product within the cup. The straw was then used to stir the product. Often, the straw would have to be intermittently removed and re-inserted at a different position to prevent the product simply rotating within the cup.


KNEADING: With the cap in place, the container was gripped in both hands such that the fingers and thumbs were substantially around the first section (2). The grip was then tightened and the container worked by twisting, folding and pressing.


SQUEEZING: With the cap in place, the container was gripped in both hands such that the fingers and thumbs were substantially around the first section (109). The grip was then rhythmically tightened and released to crush the product within the container. Intermittent inversion of the container was required to move remaining solid portions of the product into the vicinity of the first section (109).


SHAKING: With the cap in place, the container was gripped in one or both hands about the first section (109) and then shaken continually by rapidly moving it up and down by a distance of about 30 cm.


Results

The results of the tests are given in Table III.













TABLE III







Transformation Mode
Container Type
Drinkability (60 s)









Stirring
A
2



Kneading
B
4



Squeezing
C
3



Shaking
D1
2




D2
1




D3
4




D4
4










It is apparent from these tests that both squeezing and kneading are more efficient modes of transforming a frozen product into a slushy drink than is stirring. It is also apparent that shaking is only effective when the container is only part-filled (i.e. less than 66% fill volume).


Example 2

In this example two fruit-based smoothies according to the invention are described.


Containers

All products were packaged in PET bottles having a brim full capacity of 250 ml and similar to the container shown in FIG. 2.


Formulations

All concentrations are given on a w/w basis.


Specialist materials were as follows:

    • Low Fructose Corn Syrup was C*TruSweet 017Y4, had a moisture level of 22%, a DE of 63 and was supplied by Cerester, Manchester, UK.
    • Whey Powder was Avonol™ 600 Whey powder supplied by Glanbia Ingredients (Ballyragget, Co. Kilkenny, Ireland), and has a moisture content 3.7%, a lactose content of 53% and a protein content of 31%.
    • Strawberry Puree was supplied by SVZ International BV (Holland) and was an aseptically filled, seedless, single-strength puree having a water content of 89%, a sucrose content of 0.9%, a dextrose content of 2.2% and a fructose content of 2.3%.
    • Iota Carrageenan was Deltagel™ P388, supplied by Quest International (Bromborough Port, UK) and had a moisture content of less than 10%.
    • Guar Gum was supplied by Willy Benecke (Hanburg, Germany) and had a moisture content below 14%.
    • Monoglyceride emulsifier was ADMUL MG 40-04 supplied by Quest International, Bromborough Port, UK.
    • Yoghurt was supplied by Delicelait (Normandy, France) and had 3.5% fat, 3.8% protein and 4.9% galactose.


The smoothies were prepared by combining syrups with ice particles. The formulations of the syrups and the final frozen products are given in Table IV.












TABLE IV









Smoothie E
Smoothie F













Frozen

Frozen



Syrup
Product
Syrup
Product















Dextrose Monohydrate (%)
14.90
10.43
15.30
9.94


Low Fructose Corn Syrup (%)
30.50
21.35
21.40
13.91


Skimmed Milk Powder (%)
1.70
1.19
4.60
3.00


Whey Powder (%)
1.70
1.19
6.70
4.36


Coconut Oil (%)
1.10
0.77
4.60
3.00


Iota Carrageenan (%)
0.14
0.10
0.15
0.10


Guar Gum (%)
0.07
0.05
0.08
0.05


Monoglyceride Emulsifier(%)
0.20
0.14
0.23
0.15


Yoghurt (%)
12.00
8.40




Strawberry Puree (%)
20.00
14.00
23.00
14.95


Beetroot Red Colour (%)
0.10
0.07
0.10
0.07


Citric Acid (%)
0.12
0.08
0.15
0.10


Flavour (%)
0.12
0.08
0.15
0.10


Water (%)
17.35
42.15
23.54
50.27


FPDS (%)
40.7
28.5
37.5
24.4


<M>n (g mol−1)
236
236
237
237









Preparation of Frozen Products

The frozen products were prepared as in Example 1, except for the ingredients added following rapid cooling of the mix, the amount of overrun whipped into the syrup during freezing, the amount of ice particles combined with the syrup and the size of the constriction, d, used in the size-reduction device.


For both smoothies, the strawberry puree as well as the acids and flavours were added post-pasteurisation. For smoothie E, the yoghurt was also added post-pasteurisation.


For both smoothies the overrun of the syrup at the freezer outlet was around 50%; which gave a final product overrun of around 30%.


For both smoothies the constriction size, d, was 2 mm.


For smoothie E, the syrup and ice particles were combined in a weight ratio of 2.33 syrup : 1 ice (i.e. 30% w/w ice particles on total product). For smoothie F, the ratio was 1.86 syrup : 1 ice (i.e. 35% w/w ice particles on total product). For both smoothies the fill volume was 230 ml.


Example 3

This example describes a milkshake according to the invention.


Container

The container used was as in Example 2.


Formulation

All concentrations are given on a w/w basis. Specialist materials were as in Example 2.


A strawberry flavoured frozen product was prepared having the formulation given in Table V.











TABLE V







Milkshake



















Dextrose Monohydrate (%)
12.60



Low Fructose Corn Syrup (%)
14.10



Skimmed Milk Powder (%)
4.00



Whey Powder (%)
4.40



Coconut Oil (%)
8.00



Iota Carrageenan (%)
0.12



Guar Gum (%)
0.10



Monoglyceride Emulsifier(%)
0.30



Strawberry Puree (%)
15.00



Beetroot Red Colour (%)
0.10



Citric Acid (%)
0.15



Flavour (%)
0.12



Water (%)
41.01



FPDS (%)
27.5



<M>n (g mol−1)
232










Slush Manufacture

All ingredients except for the puree, flavour, acids, fat and emulsifiers were combined in an agitated heated mix tank. The fat was then melted and emulsifiers added to the liquid fat prior to pouring into the mix tank. The mix was subjected to high shear mixing at a temperature of 65° C. for 2 minutes. The mix was then passed through a homogeniser at 150 bar and 70° C. and then subjected to pasteurisation at 83° C. for 20 s before being rapidly cooled to 4° C. by passing through a plate heat exchanger. The puree, flavour and acids were then added and the mix held at 4° C. in an agitated tank prior to freezing.


The mix was frozen into a slush using a typical ice cream freezer operating with an open dasher (series 80), a mix flow rate of 150 1/hour, an extrusion temperature of −12° C. and an overrun of 50%.


Filling and Hardening

The slush exiting the freezer was dosed into the containers at a fill volume of 230 ml. The containers were then capped and then blast frozen for 4 hours at −35° C.


Transportation

The products were stored at −25° C. for 1 week and then transported from the hardening location in Bedfordshire, UK to a second location in Rome, Italy. Transportation was via refrigerated lorry operating at a temperature of −20° C.


Tempering

At the second location the products were stored for 7 days in a freezer cabinet operating at −10° C. No phase separation, shrinkage or other instability is apparent in the products following such storage and distribution.


Transformation

The products were removed from the freezer cabinet and transformed into a drinkable state by squeezing and kneading the containers for around 60-90 s. The caps were then removed from the containers and the resulting milkshakes drunk from the containers.

Claims
  • 1. A method of serving a slushy drink comprising the steps of: manufacturing a slush, thenfilling a container with the slush, thenhardening the slush at a hardening location to produce a frozen product in the container, thentransporting the frozen product in the container from the hardening location through a cold chain to a retail outlet, thenwarming the frozen product in the container at the retail outlet to a temperature, T, of between −14 and −5° C., and thentransforming the frozen product in the container into the slushy drink;
  • 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the container is deformable by hand pressure.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the frozen product in the container is transformed into the slushy drink by deforming the container.
  • 4. A method according to claim 3 wherein the frozen product in the container is transformed into the slushy drink by manually deforming the container.
  • 5. A method according to claim 4 wherein manually deforming the container involves a mode selected from squeezing, kneading and combinations thereof.
  • 6. A method according to claim 1 wherein T is between −12 and −6° C.
  • 7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of warming the frozen product in the container is achieved by tempering the frozen product at the temperature T.
  • 8. A method according to claim 1 wherein the slush is manufactured by a process comprising the steps of: providing an aqueous syrup comprising freezing point depressants,providing particles of ice, andcombining the aqueous syrup with the particles of ice to form the slush.
  • 9. A method according to claim 8 wherein the process comprises the additional step of reducing the ice particle size in the slush.
  • 10. A method according to claim 9 wherein the additional step of reducing the ice particle size in the slush comprises passing the slush through a constriction of less than 5 mm, preferably of between 0.5 and 3 mm.
  • 11. A frozen product in a container, the container (1, 101) comprising a wall (2, 102) delimiting a cavity (6, 106), the frozen product being within the cavity and at least a first section (2, 109) of the wall being deformable by hand pressure; characterised in that, at a temperature in the range −10° C. to −8° C., the frozen product is transformable from a non-drinkable to a drinkable state by manually deforming the first section of the wall for a period of between 10 and 200 s, preferably for a period of between 30 and 100 s.
  • 12. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the volume of the frozen product is at least 70%, preferably at least 80% of the brim full capacity of the container.
  • 13. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product has an overrun of less than 5%.
  • 14. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product has an overrun between 5 and 80%.
  • 15. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains freezing point depressants in an amount from 20 to 40% (w/w), the freezing point depressants having a number average molecular weight below 275 g mol−1.
  • 16. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains less than 1.5% glycerol, preferably less than 0.2%.
  • 17. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains from 0.001 to 2% (w/w) of a stabiliser selected from iota-carrageenan, xanthan gum and mixtures thereof.
  • 18. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains fat in an amount from 0.5 to 12% (w/w).
  • 19. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains less than 0.5% (w/w) fat.
  • 20. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains one or more milk proteins in an amount of between 0.5 and 5% (w/w).
  • 21. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains less than 0.5% (w/w) milk protein.
  • 22. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the frozen product contains ice particles having a size distribution wherein at least 25% by number of the ice particles have a size of greater than 1 mm2.
  • 23. A frozen product in a container according to claim 11 wherein the container additionally comprises a straw and the frozen product transformed to a drinkable state has a flow rate through the straw of at least 1.75 g s−1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
04254314.0 Jul 2004 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP05/06697 6/20/2005 WO 00 1/19/2007