Method of stabilizing protein contained in specimen and solution for stabilizing protein contained in specimen

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12215140
  • Patent Number
    12,215,140
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 28, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 4, 2025
    2 days ago
Abstract
The present invention provides a method of stabilizing a protein. The method includes a step of causing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid. The protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one type selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex. According to the present invention, it is possible to stabilize a protein such as a blood protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body. The present invention further provides a stabilizing solution for stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body and a method and a kit for detecting a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method for stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, a solution for stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, and a method and a kit for detecting a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body.


BACKGROUND ART

Detection of proteins contained in specimens such as feces, urine, and saliva is useful for diagnosis of many diseases. For example, a fecal occult blood test of detecting blood in a fecal specimen enables acquisition of important information in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases such as colon cancer. Known methods of detecting blood proteins or the like such as hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex contained in a specimen such as feces include an immunological measurement method for detection using an antibody which reacts with these proteins.


A specimen to be subjected for an occult blood test is usually collected by a subject in a container containing a preservation solution, and is sent to an inspection institution such as a hospital. In many cases, the preservation solution (sample) containing a specimen (the preservation solution containing a specimen will be referred to as a sample herein) is often exposed to unfavorable temperature conditions for preservation because its transportation requires several days and temperature management during the transportation is generally difficult. If proteins such as blood proteins contained in a specimen are denatured due to temperature conditions during the transportation and the like or decomposed or modified by bacteria or enzymes contained in the specimen to change the structure of the epitope or its vicinity, then the antibody cannot recognize the proteins contained in the feces, and accurate measurement by the immunological measurement method will be difficult. In particular, hemoglobin is unstable in the solution and liable to be denatured or decomposed under high temperature conditions.


As a technique for stabilizing hemoglobin in the preservation solution, for example, various methods have been proposed, including a method of adding an antibacterial agent such as thimerosal or chlorhexidine (e.g., Patent Document 1), a method of adding a protease inhibitor (e.g., Patent Document 2), a method of adding a glycosidase-type lytic enzyme (e.g., Patent Document 3), a method of adding an enzymatic decomposition product of hemoglobin (e.g., Patent Document 4), a method of adding an organic acid such as malic acid (e.g., Patent Document 5), a method of adding iminocarboxylic acid (e.g., Patent Document 6), and a method of adding haloalkanesulfonic acid (e.g., Patent Document 7).


Furthermore, there has been known a method of adding haptoglobin to stabilize hemoglobin (e.g., Patent Document 8). It is known that haptoglobin exists in blood of a wide variety of animals, rapidly binds to hemoglobin, and forms a stable hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex (Hb-Hp complex). By preliminarily adding haptoglobin to the preservation solution or the like which preserves a specimen such as feces, when the specimen such as feces is added to the preservation solution, the hemoglobin contained in the specimen derived from a living body can be made to a stable hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


However, because hemoglobin is extremely unstable, even such methods of stabilizing hemoglobin have not yet sufficiently prevented the denaturation or decomposition. In this context, a method of measuring transferrin which is more excellent in the stability than hemoglobin is also known as a method of detecting the fecal occult blood (e.g., Patent Document 9), but the transferrin exists in blood only at about 1/60 as compared with hemoglobin, and the problem is therefore that the sensitivity is low.


PRIOR ART DOCUMENTS
Patent Documents





    • [Patent Document 1] JP63-271160A

    • [Patent Document 2] JP3-279859A

    • [Patent Document 3] JP63-246667A

    • [Patent Document 4] JP11-218533A

    • [Patent Document 5] JP2003-14768A

    • [Patent Document 6] JP2009-097956A

    • [Patent Document 7] JP2016-191580A

    • [Patent Document 8] JP10-132824A

    • [Patent Document 9] JP63-246668A





SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention

A considerable number of bacteria and enzymes that cause decomposition and modification of proteins such as hemoglobin exist in a specimen derived from a living body, such as feces, urine, or saliva, and particularly in feces; therefore, even proteins having relatively high stability, such as a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex, may be decomposed or modified.


An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a method of enhancing the stability of a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body even under unfavorable temperature conditions in which decomposition, denaturation, and the like are likely to occur.


Means For Solving the Problems

(1) A method of stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, the method including a step of causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid, wherein

    • the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one type selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


(2) The method according to (1), wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid and derivatives thereof.


(3) The method according to (1)(2), wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, hydroxyphenylboronic acid, carboxyphenylboronic acid, aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof.


(4) The method according to (1) to (3), wherein

    • the step is a step of dispersing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body in a solution containing the arylboronic acid, and
    • the concentration of the arylboronic acid in the solution is 0.1 mmol/L or more.


(5) The method according to (1) to (4), wherein the step is a step of causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body to coexist with the arylboronic acid and a sugar.


(6) The method according to (5), wherein the sugar is at least one type selected from the group consisting of sugar alcohol, monosaccharide, and disaccharide.


(7) The method according to (5)(6), wherein the sugar is at least one type selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, glucose, mannitol, fructose, xylitol, erythritol, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, and maltose.


(8) The method according to (5) to (7), wherein

    • the step is a step of dispersing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body in a solution containing the arylboronic acid and the sugar, and
    • the concentration of the sugar in the solution is 5 mmol/L or more.


(9) The method according to (1) to (8), wherein

    • the specimen derived from the living body contains at least hemoglobin, and
    • the method includes a step of bringing the hemoglobin and haptoglobin into contact with each other to form a complex of hemoglobin and haptoglobin.


(10) The method according to (1) to (9), wherein the specimen derived from the living body is feces, saliva, or urine.


(11) A stabilizing solution for stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, wherein

    • the stabilizing solution contains an arylboronic acid, and
    • the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one type selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


(12) The stabilizing solution according to (11), wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid and derivatives thereof.


(13) The stabilizing solution according to (11)(12), wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, hydroxyphenylboronic acid, carboxyphenylboronic acid, aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof.


(14) The stabilizing solution according to (11) to (13), containing a sugar.


(15) The stabilizing solution according to (14), wherein the sugar is at least one type selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, glucose, mannitol, fructose, xylitol, erythritol, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, and maltose.


(16) The stabilizing solution according to (11) to (15), containing haptoglobin.


(17) The stabilizing solution according to (11) to (16), wherein the specimen is feces, saliva, or urine.


(18) The stabilizing solution according to (11) to (17), wherein the stabilizing solution is a solution for preserving the specimen derived from the living body.


(19) A method of detecting a protein in a specimen derived from a living body, the method comprising:

    • a step of adding the specimen derived from the living body to the stabilizing solution according to (11) to (18) to obtain a sample containing the specimen; and
    • a step of detecting the protein in the sample by an immunological measurement method, wherein
    • the protein in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one type selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


(20) The method according to (19), wherein

    • the specimen derived from the living body contains at least hemoglobin, and
    • the hemoglobin in the sample forms a complex together with haptoglobin.


(21) The method according to (20), wherein the stabilizing solution is the stabilizing solution according to (16).


(22) A kit for detecting a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, the kit including:

    • the stabilizing solution according to (11) to (18); and
    • a reagent containing an antibody that recognizes the protein, wherein
    • the protein is at least one type selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


Advantageous Effect of the Invention

According to the present invention, the protein such as blood protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body can be stabilized. In other words, according to the present invention, it is possible to prevent denaturation, decomposition, or modification of the protein such as blood protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body. According to the present invention, therefore, it is possible to accurately measure the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body by an immunological measurement method.







EMBODIMENTS FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Hereinafter, one or more preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described.


(Method of Stabilizing Protein Contained in Specimen Derived From Living Body and Stabilizing Solution For Protein)


The method of stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a step of causing a protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid. In the present embodiment, the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


By causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid, the stability of the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body can be enhanced. The protein-containing specimen derived from a living body may be feces, saliva, or urine and may be feces.


The method of causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid is not particularly limited, but examples of the method include a method of dispersing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body in a solution containing an arylboronic acid. Here, “dispersion” includes dissolution and suspension.


Examples of the solution containing an arylboronic acid include a preservation solution for preserving the specimen derived from a living body, a diluent solution for further diluting a sample in which the specimen is dispersed in a preservation solution, and a reaction solution in a kit or the like for detecting a protein in the specimen. In particular, the preservation solution for a specimen can be preferably used because it can significantly improve the stability of a protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body according to the present embodiment.


The arylboronic acid can be appropriately selected from known ones. The arylboronic acid may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid and derivatives thereof, may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, hydroxyphenylboronic acid, carboxyphenylboronic acid, aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof, may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid, 2-carboxyphenylboronic acid, 3-carboxyphenylboronic acid, 4-carboxyphenylboronic acid, 3-aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof, and may particularly be at least one type selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid, 3-carboxyphenylboronic acid, 3-aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof.


The lower limit of the concentration of the arylboronic acid in the above solution may be preferably 0.1 mmol/L or more, 0.2 mmol/L or more, or 0.5 mmol/L or more. When the concentration of the arylboronic acid is the above lower limit or more, the effect of stabilizing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body is more excellent.


From another aspect, the upper limit of the concentration of the arylboronic acid in the above solution may be preferably 100 mmol/L or less, 50 mmol/L or less, or 30 mmol/L or less. If the concentration of the arylboronic acid is unduly high, the apparent recovery ratio may decrease when the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body is measured by an immunological measurement method. This appears because the stabilizing effect of the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body does not decrease, but the high concentration of arylboronic acid adversely effects the immunological measurement. Fortunately, however, when the concentration of the arylboronic acid is the above upper limit or less, the adverse effects on the immunological measurement method are suppressed, and more accurate measurement can be performed.


It is to be noted, however, that even when the solution contains a high concentration of arylboronic acid, if it coexists with a high concentration of sugar, which will be described later, the arylboronic acid and the sugar form a complex thereby to suppress the adverse effects on the immunological measurement method due to the high concentration of arylboronic acid. Thus, provided that the arylboronic acid coexists with a high concentration of sugar, even when the concentration of the arylboronic acid is about 50 mmol/L or further about 100 mmol/L, accurate measurement by the immunological measurement method is ensured.


In a more specific aspect of the present embodiment, the arylboronic acid can be contained in a solution (stabilizing solution) for stabilizing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body. For example, when the stabilizing solution does not contain haptoglobin, which will be described later, the lower limit of the concentration of the arylboronic acid in the stabilizing solution can be 0.1 mmol/L or more, 0.2 mmol/L or more, or 0.5 mmol/L or more. From another aspect, the upper limit of the concentration of the arylboronic acid in the stabilizing solution can be 20 mmol/L or less, 10 mmol/L or less, or 5 mmol/L or less.


The above step can be a step of causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body to coexist with a sugar together with the above arylboronic acid. By coexisting with a sugar in addition to the arylboronic acid, the stability of the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body can be further enhanced. Examples of the method of causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body to coexist with a sugar include a method of causing the sugar to be further contained in a solution that contains the above arylboronic acid.


The sugar can be appropriately selected from known ones, and examples of the sugar include sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol, and erythritol; monosaccharides such as glucose, fructose, mannose, and galactose; disaccharides such as sucrose, trehalose, lactose, and maltose; and oligosaccharide.


The sugar may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of sugar alcohols, monosaccharides, and disaccharides, may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, glucose, mannitol, fructose, xylitol, erythritol, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, and maltose, and may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, mannitol, fructose, and sucrose.


However, sugars (reducing sugars) such as glucose and fructose that form aldehyde groups or ketone groups in a solution react with proteins contained in the specimen derived from a living body or with albumins or the like added to the solution as stabilizers for these proteins (Maillard reaction) to modify the proteins and generate a brown substance (melanoidin) and, therefore, a sugar that does not react with proteins may be preferred. If the epitope or its vicinity of a protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body is modified by a reducing sugar to change the structure, some antibodies cannot recognize such proteins contained in the specimen derived from a living body, so that accurate measurement by an immunological measurement method may not be possible. In a more specific aspect of the present embodiment, therefore, it is more preferred to use a non-reducing sugar that does not react with proteins. The non-reducing sugar may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol, erythritol, trehalose, sucrose, and lactose, and may be at least one type selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, mannitol, and sucrose.


The lower limit of the sugar concentration may be preferably 5 mmol/L or more, 10 mmol/L or more, or 25 mmol/L or more. When the sugar concentration is the above lower limit or more, the sugar acts synergistically with an arylboronic acid, and the effect of stabilizing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body is further excellent.


The upper limit of the sugar concentration may be 1000 mmol/L or less, 500 mmol/L or less, or 100 mmol/L or less for sugar alcohols and monosaccharides, and may be 500 mmol/L or less, 250 mmol/L or less, or 100 mmol/L or less for disaccharides. When the sugar concentration is the above upper limit or less, the viscosity of the stabilizing solution is not unduly high, so the measurement may be performed without any problem.


It suffices that the stabilizing solution for preserving the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body is a buffer solution that can keep the pH at 5 to 10 or preferably 6 to 8, and the stabilizing solution may be a buffer solution that contains a Good buffer such as 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES), hydroxyethylpiperazine-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), or piperazine-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES), and may be a phosphate buffer solution, a tris buffer solution, or a glycine buffer solution.


The stabilizing solution may further contain additives such as an antibacterial agent, a pH adjuster, a salt for adjusting the ionic strength, a surfactant, an agglutination promoter, and a known stabilizing agent used when preserving proteins. Examples of the antibacterial agent include sodium azide, an antibiotic, and a lytic enzyme. Examples of the additives include known substances that are known to have a protein stabilizing action, such as histidine, lysine, and other amino acids, albumin, a protease inhibitor, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and other chelating agents.


According to the above-described stabilizing method or stabilizing solution, the stability of the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body can be enhanced by the action of the arylboronic acid or the synergistic action of the arylboronic acid and the sugar. In other words, according to the above-described stabilizing method or stabilizing solution, it is possible to prevent denaturation, decomposition, or modification of the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body and maintain the structure of the epitope and its surrounding region of the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body. Thus, when detecting the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body by an immunological measurement method, improvement in the detection accuracy can be expected.


A more specific aspect of the present embodiment may include a step of bringing the specimen derived from a living body containing at least hemoglobin into contact with haptoglobin thereby to form a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex. In this case, the specimen derived from a living body containing hemoglobin may be feces, saliva, or urine and may be feces. The method of the present embodiment is distinctly useful because feces contain a particularly considerable number of bacteria and enzymes that cause decomposition and modification of hemoglobin.


The specimen derived from a living body containing hemoglobin may be brought into contact with the haptoglobin in any manner, but it may be preferred to add the specimen derived from a living body containing hemoglobin to the previously described preservation solution containing haptoglobin. Hemoglobin contained in the specimen derived from a living body rapidly reacts with the haptoglobin in the preservation solution to form a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex. Then, the preservation solution to which the specimen derived from a living body is added may be preserved without any treatment, and the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex can thereby be stably preserved. In the formation of a complex of hemoglobin and haptoglobin, the hemoglobin dissociates from a tetramer (α2β2) having two α chains and two β chains associated with each other into two dimers (αβ), but this phenomenon does not represent the “decomposition” or “denaturation” in the present specification.


The stabilizing solution for stabilizing the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body containing hemoglobin according to the present embodiment may preferably be a solution obtained by further adding haptoglobin to the above-described stabilizing solution which contains an arylboronic acid or contains an arylboronic acid and a sugar. The concentration of haptoglobin in the stabilizing solution depends on the amount of the specimen derived from a living body, but may be, for example, 0.05 units/L to 50 units/L, 0.1 units/L to 10 units/L, or 0.2 units/L to 2 units/L. Here, one unit represents the amount of haptoglobin that binds to 1 mg of hemoglobin. The haptoglobin concentration in the above range is a concentration sufficient to convert all hemoglobin in the specimen derived from a living body into a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


Here, when the stabilizing solution contains haptoglobin, which will be described later, the lower limit of the concentration of the above arylboronic acid in the stabilizing solution can be 0.1 mmol/L or more, 0.2 mmol/L or more, 0.5 mmol/L or more, 1 mmol/L or more, or 5 mmol/L or more. When the concentration of the arylboronic acid is the above lower limit or more, the stabilizing effect of the arylboronic acid on the hemoglobin contained in the specimen derived from a living body is more remarkable in corporation with the stabilizing effect of the haptoglobin.


From another aspect, the upper limit of the concentration of the arylboronic acid in the stabilizing solution can be 100 mmol/L or less, 50 mmol/L or less, or 30 mmol/L or less. When the concentration of the arylboronic acid is the above upper limit or less, adverse effects on an immunological measurement method are suppressed, and more accurate measurement is possible.


According to the stabilizing method or stabilizing solution of the above-described aspect, the hemoglobin contained in the specimen derived from a living body can be stably preserved in the form of a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex. In other words, according to the above-described stabilizing method or stabilizing solution, it is possible to prevent denaturation, decomposition, or modification of the hemoglobin contained in the specimen derived from a living body and maintain the structure of the epitope and its surrounding region of the hemoglobin. Thus, when measuring the hemoglobin contained in the specimen derived from a living body by an immunological measurement method, improvement in the detection accuracy can be expected.


(Method of Detecting Protein Contained in Specimen Derived From Living Body and Detection Kit)


The method of detecting a protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body, which is provided by an embodiment of the present invention, includes a step of adding the specimen derived from the living body to the above-described stabilizing solution for stabilizing the protein to obtain a sample containing the specimen derived from the living body and a step of detecting the protein in the sample by an immunological measurement method.


The kit for detecting a protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body, which is provided by another embodiment of the present invention, includes the above-described stabilizing solution and a reagent containing an antibody that recognizes the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body.


In the above detection method or detection kit, the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body may be at least one type selected from hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.


Examples of the stabilizing solution used in the present embodiment include a preservation solution for preserving the specimen derived from a living body, a diluent solution for further diluting a sample in which the specimen is dispersed in a preservation solution, and a reaction solution in a kit or the like for detecting the protein in the specimen. Examples of the reaction solution in a kit or the like include a solution containing an antibody in an immunological measurement method, which will be described later, and a solution for being mixed with a sample to adjust the measurement environment.


The immunological measurement method is a method utilizing an antibody which reacts with a protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body, and a known immunological measurement method can be used. The immunological measurement method may be, for example, an immunoagglutination method such as a latex agglutination method or a gold colloid agglutination method, an immunochromatography method, or an ELISA method.


The antibody reacting with the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body may be, but is not limited to, a polyclonal antibody, a monoclonal antibody, or a fragment of an antibody reacting with the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body, which fragment is capable of recognizing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body.


It suffices that the antibody reacting with the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body is an antibody that recognizes the protein to be measured, and the antibody may be an anti-hemoglobin antibody, an anti-haptoglobin antibody, or an anti-hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex antibody. These antibodies can be made by commonly-used methods.


As an example, detection of the protein contained in the specimen derived from a living body, such as detection of hemoglobin, can be performed as follows. First, the specimen is added to a container containing a preservation solution to prepare a sample. The specimen may be preserved in the container for an arbitrary time, or the preservation solution containing the specimen may be filtered to prepare a sample. Then, the hemoglobin in the sample is detected by an immunological measurement method such as a latex agglutination method. More specifically, a reagent containing latex particles having surfaces immobilizing an anti-hemoglobin antibody is added to the sample. Before adding the reagent containing the latex particles, the sample may be diluted with a diluent, or a reaction solution may be added. In the present aspect, the above-described stabilizing solution containing an arylboronic acid may be any of a preservation solution, a diluent solution, and a reaction solution. It is particularly preferred that the preservation solution be the above-described stabilizing solution. In this case, the diluent solution and/or reaction solution may or may not contain an arylboronic acid.


In the specimen derived from a living body, hemoglobin may form a complex together with haptoglobin in the specimen or may exist as free hemoglobin. Thus, preferably, the anti-hemoglobin antibody used for the detection of hemoglobin is capable of recognizing the epitope of the free hemoglobin and the epitope of hemoglobin in the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex and does not cross-react with haptoglobin.


When hemoglobin exists in a sample, the anti-hemoglobin antibody recognizes the hemoglobin, and the latex particles immobilizing the antibody agglutinate. The change in turbidity due to agglutination is measured, and the hemoglobin concentration in the sample may be obtained from the calibration curve created using a calibrator that contains hemoglobin of a known concentration. Additionally or alternatively, the concentration of hemoglobin in the sample can be obtained from the calibration curve created based on the concentration of hemoglobin in the calibrator.


When the above stabilizing solution contains haptoglobin, detection of hemoglobin can be performed, for example, as follows. First, the specimen is added to a container containing a preservation solution to prepare a sample. The specimen may be preserved in the container for an arbitrary time, or the preservation solution containing the specimen may be filtered to prepare a sample. Then, the hemoglobin in the sample is detected by an immunological measurement method such as a latex agglutination method. More specifically, a reagent containing latex particles having surfaces immobilizing an anti-hemoglobin antibody is added to the sample. Before adding the reagent containing the latex particles, the sample may be diluted with a diluent, or a reaction solution may be added.


In the present aspect, the stabilizing solution containing an arylboronic acid and haptoglobin may be any of a preservation solution, a diluent solution, and a reaction solution.


It is particularly preferred that the preservation solution be the stabilizing solution containing an arylboronic acid and haptoglobin. In this case, the diluent solution and/or reaction solution may or may not contain haptoglobin and may or may not contain an arylboronic acid.


In the present aspect, when hemoglobin exists in the specimen, the hemoglobin reacts with haptoglobin contained in the stabilizing solution to form a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex. It is not necessary for all hemoglobin in the specimen to form a complex, and hemoglobin that does not form a complex together with haptoglobin may exist in the stabilizing solution (sample) containing the specimen (the preservation solution containing a specimen will be referred to as a sample herein), but preferably, all hemoglobin in the specimen forms a complex together with haptoglobin.


Preferably, the anti-hemoglobin antibody is capable of recognizing the epitope of hemoglobin in the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex and does not cross-react with haptoglobin.


When hemoglobin exists in the sample, the anti-hemoglobin antibody recognizes the hemoglobin (including hemoglobin that forms a complex with haptoglobin), and the latex particles immobilizing the antibody agglutinate. The change in turbidity due to agglutination is measured, and the hemoglobin concentration in the sample may be obtained from the calibration curve created using a calibrator that contains a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex of a known hemoglobin concentration. Additionally or alternatively, the concentration of the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex in the sample can be obtained from the calibration curve created based on the concentration of the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex in the calibrator.


It should be appreciated that the embodiments heretofore explained are described to facilitate understanding of the present invention and are not described to limit the present invention. It is therefore intended that the elements disclosed in the above embodiments include all design changes and equivalents to fall within the technical scope of the present invention.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

Preservation solutions were prepared with the addition of 40 mmol/L HEPES (pH 6.8), 0.1% BSA, 0.1% NaN3, 1 unit/L haptoglobin, and 0 to 100 mmol/L phenylboronic acid. Samples obtained by adding hemoglobin-added fecal specimens to the preservation solutions so that the fecal concentration would be 0.5% were preserved at 37° C. for 0, 7, 14, and 21 days. The fecal specimens were added with hemoglobin having an amount such that the hemoglobin concentration in the samples would be about 300 μg/L. Instead of the fecal specimens to which hemoglobin was added, samples containing no fecal specimens, in which hemoglobin was added to the preservation solutions so that the hemoglobin concentration in the samples would be 300 μg/L, were similarly preserved. The hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations (μg/L) in the preserved samples were measured by the latex agglutination method.


The concentrations of hemoglobin were measured using “OC-Hemodia (registered trademark) Auto III ‘EIKEN’” (available from EIKEN CHEMICAL CO., LTD.) as a measurement reagent and “OC-sensor DIANA” (available from EIKEN CHEMICAL CO., LTD.) as a measurement device. The above measurement reagent contains latex particles immobilizing an anti-human hemoglobin rabbit polyclonal antibody.


From the measured concentrations of hemoglobin, the recovery ratios (%) were calculated with respect to the hemoglobin concentrations immediately after the fecal specimens were added to the preservation solutions (i.e., concentrations 0 days after the fecal specimens were added). The results are listed in Table 1. As clearly understood from Table 1, in any of samples of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the samples was improved by adding phenylboronic acid at a concentration of 0.5 mmol/L or more. The recovery ratio of hemoglobin was improved depending on the phenylboronic acid concentration and reached the maximum at a phenylboronic acid concentration of 15 mmol/L, and the apparent recovery ratio decreased with the addition of 50 mmol/L or more. In the samples containing no fecal specimens, the improvement of recovery ratio by addition of phenylboronic acid was not observed. These results indicate that the phenylboronic acid stabilizes the hemoglobin in the samples containing feces. The hemoglobin in the samples exists as a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex react to haptoglobin contained in the preservation solution; therefore, the above results mean that the phenylboronic acid stabilized the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.













TABLE 1











Recovery ratio with respect to Hb




Hb concentration (μg/L)
concentration after 0 days (%)



Phenyl-boronic
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.

















acid (mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days




















Feces 1
0
282
135
99
71
100
48
35
25



0.5
279
181
147
129
100
65
53
46



1
275
182
148
125
100
66
54
45



2.5
289
207
175
152
100
72
61
53



15
302
243
239
224
100
80
79
74



50
290
230
204
185
100
79
70
64



100
271
186
137
97
100
69
51
36


Feces 2
0
292
111
68
50
100
38
23
17



0.5
271
147
113
91
100
54
42
34



1
284
166
136
116
100
58
48
41



2.5
288
195
159
139
100
68
55
48



15
283
249
214
191
100
88
76
67



50
269
214
174
149
100
80
65
55



100
250
139
80
36
100
56
32
14


Feces 3
0
286
93
60
51
100
33
21
18



0.5
283
133
104
93
100
47
37
33



1
281
159
131
115
100
57
47
41



2.5
290
189
160
145
100
65
55
50



15
288
224
200
185
100
78
69
64



50
274
204
176
158
100
74
64
58



100
247
156
88
53
100
63
36
21


No
0
268
243
238
239
100
91
89
89


feces
0.5
257
248
243
246
100
96
95
96



1
265
244
241
244
100
92
91
92



2.5
272
249
244
258
100
92
90
95



15
286
262
253
264
100
92
88
92



50
260
242
228
235
100
93
88
90



100
239
198
183
178
100
83
77
74









Example 2

Preservation solutions were prepared by adding 2-carboxyphenylboronic acid (2-CPBA), 3-carboxyphenylboronic acid (3-CPBA), 4-carboxyphenylboronic acid (4-CPBA), 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid (3-HPBA), and 3-aminophenylboronic acid (3-APBA) each at 15 mmol/L as substitute for the phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 1, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1. For comparative examples, preservation solutions to which no arylboronic acid was added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner. The results are listed in Table 2. As clearly understood from Table 2, also when other arylboronic acids were used, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the sample was improved in any of fecal specimens of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3 as compared with the comparative examples in which no arylboronic acid was added.













TABLE 2











Recovery ratio with respect to Hb




Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)



Arylboronic
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.















acid (15 mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
0 days
7 days
14 days


















Feces 1
No addition
315
154
119
100
49
38



2C-PBA
315
196
150
100
62
48



3C-PBA
309
249
239
100
81
77



4C-PBA
312
252
234
100
81
75



3H-PBA
327
269
268
100
82
82



3A-PBA
339
275
260
100
81
77


Feces 2
No addition
313
108
78
100
34
25



2C-PBA
311
157
103
100
50
33



3C-PBA
309
264
240
100
85
78



4C-PBA
315
239
227
100
76
72



3H-PBA
326
227
264
100
85
81



3A-PBA
330
287
261
100
87
79


Feces 3
No addition
304
90
63
100
30
21



2C-PBA
300
124
76
100
41
25



3C-PBA
300
213
200
100
71
67



4C-PBA
300
219
194
100
73
65



3H-PBA
313
213
206
100
68
66



3A-PBA
324
227
209
100
70
64


No
No addition
295
276
267
100
94
91


feces
2C-PBA
292
272
264
100
93
90



3C-PBA
293
281
276
100
96
94



4C-PBA
279
275
271
100
98
97



3H-PBA
303
294
296
100
97
98



3A-PBA
278
275
272
100
99
98









Example 3

The concentration of phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 1 was fixed to 15 mmol/L, preservation solutions to which a sugar (sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, glucose, fructose, or mannitol) was further added at 50 mmol/L or 100 mmol/L or preservation solutions to which no sugar was added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1. For comparative examples, preservation solutions to which the phenylboronic acid and sugar were not added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner. The results are listed in Table 3. As clearly understood from Table 3, when sorbitol, mannitol, sucrose, or fructose was further added to the phenylboronic acid, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the sample was further improved in any of fecal specimens of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3 and remarkably improved particularly with any of sorbitol and mannitol. With trehalose or glucose, however, fecal specimens (Feces 3) in which the recovery ratios were not improved were also recognized. These results indicate that the stability of hemoglobin in the samples containing feces can be further improved by adding a sugar to the phenylboronic acid, but the effects differ depending on the type of a sugar added. Among sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, glucose, fructose, and mannitol, the sorbitol and mannitol had remarkable effects, and in particular, the sorbitol exhibited no decrease in the recovery ratios in the fecal specimens (Feces 1).












TABLE 3










Recovery ratio with respect to Hb



Hb concentration (μg/L)
concentration after 0 days (%)












Phenyl-boronic

Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.


















acid (mmol/L)
Sugar (mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days





















Feces 1
No addition
No addition
282
135
99
 71
100
48
35
25



15
No addition
302
243
239
224
100
80
79
74


















Sorbitol
50
291
300
300
296
100
103
103
102 




100
287
292
294
290
100
102
102
101 



Sucrose
50
291
281
274
268
100
97
94
92




100
286
272
270
258
100
95
94
90



Trehalose
50
299
261
247
241
100
87
83
81




100
291
249
238
230
100
86
82
79



Glucose
50
283
255
242
239
100
90
86
84




100
291
251
236
230
100
86
81
79



Fructose
50
297
294
285
280
100
99
96
94




100
287
276
247
228
100
96
86
79



Mannitol
50
288
278
270

100
96
94





100
281
279
276

100
99
98


















Feces 2
No addition
No addition
292
111
68
 50
100
38
23
17



15
No addition
283
249
214
191
100
88
76
67


















Sorbitol
50
281
280
252
222
100
100
90
79




100
274
276
246
219
100
101
90
80



Sucrose
50
273
266
232
212
100
97
85
78




100
267
257
236
219
100
96
88
82



Trehalose
50
284
257
223
201
100
90
79
71




100
269
251
227
206
100
93
84
77



Glucose
50
275
260
230
205
100
95
84
75




100
281
246
223
203
100
88
79
72



Fructose
50
270
275
243
222
100
102
90
82




100
280
264
235
212
100
94
84
76



Mannitol
50
296
291
280

100
98
95





100
290
290
286

100
100
99


















Feces 3
No addition
No addition
286
93
60
 51
100
33
21
18



15
No addition
288
224
200
185
100
78
69
64


















Sorbitol
50
283
250
235
223
100
88
83
79




100
278
244
226
219
100
88
81
79



Sucrose
50
286
234
209
195
100
82
73
68




100
272
230
201
187
100
85
74
69



Trehalose
50
282
221
197
178
100
78
70
63




100
281
213
192
179
100
76
68
64



Glucose
50
285
217
196
184
100
76
69
65




100
276
210
188
174
100
76
68
63



Fructose
50
272
238
218
203
100
88
80
75




100
276
244
222
204
100
88
80
74



Mannitol
50
293
247
238

100
84
81





100
286
243
240

100
85
84


















No
No addition
No addition
268
243
238
239
100
91
89
89


feces
15
No addition
286
262
253
264
100
92
88
92


















Sorbitol
50
281
261
251
265
100
93
89
94




100
276
252
244
255
100
91
88
92



Sucrose
50
271
253
246
257
100
93
91
95




100
267
247
241
260
100
93
90
97



Trehalose
50
268
253
255
257
100
94
95
96




100
269
248
251
251
100
92
93
93



Glucose
50
282
254
263
260
100
90
93
92




100
266
251
253
257
100
94
95
97



Fructose
50
286
255
261
275
100
89
91
96




100
281
245
251
262
100
87
89
93



Mannitol
50
270
263
254

100
98
94





100
269
260
252

100
97
94











Example 4

Preservation solutions in which sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, glucose, fructose, or mannitol was added at 100 mmol/L to the preservation solutions of Example 1 containing no phenylboronic acid were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1. For comparison, the same testing was conducted without adding these sugars. The results are listed in Table 4. As clearly understood from Table 4, addition of sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, glucose, or fructose to the preservation solutions containing no phenylboronic acid does not improve the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the samples containing fecal specimens. This result indicates that a sugar such as sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, glucose, or fructose alone does not stabilize the hemoglobin in the samples containing feces and also indicates that the phenylboronic acid and a sugar have to exist together.














TABLE 4












Recovery ratio with respect to Hb





Hb concentration (μg/L)
concentration after 0 days (%)



Phenyl-boronic

Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.


















acid
Sugar (100 mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days





















Feces 1
No
No addition
282
135
99
71
100
48
35
25



addition
Sorbitol
283
143
102
97
100
51
36
34




Sucrose
264
115
70
80
100
44
27
30




Trehalose
266
121
80
44
100
45
30
17




Glucose
276
135
99
59
100
49
36
21




Fructose
285
127
85
81
100
45
30
28




Mannitol
276
156
130

100
57
47



Feces 2
No
No addition
292
111
68
59
100
38
23
20



addition
Sorbitol
277
113
77
51
100
41
28
18




Sucrose
270
96
49
31
100
36
18
11




Trehalose
264
106
61
41
100
40
23
16




Glucose
276
105
54
37
100
38
20
13




Fructose
273
100
56
35
100
37
21
13




Mannitol
284
97
81

100
34
28



Feces 3
No
No addition
286
93
60
51
100
33
21
18



addition
Sorbitol
278
98
62
56
100
35
22
20




Sucrose
267
89
55
40
100
33
21
15




Trehalose
267
91
56
47
100
34
21
18




Glucose
272
93
55
46
100
34
20
17




Fructose
265
83
41
39
100
31
15
15




Mannitol
282
93
78

100
33
28



No
No
No addition
268
243
238
239 
100
91
89
89


feces
addition
Sorbitol
255
239
235
236 
100
94
92
93




Sucrose
245
228
223
222 
100
93
91
91




Trehalose
243
229
225
222 
100
94
93
91




Glucose
245
231
223
223 
100
94
91
91




Fructose
250
215
196
177 
100
86
78
71




Mannitol
261
251
244

100
96
93










Example 5

The concentration of phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 1 was fixed to 15 mmol/L, preservation solutions to which sorbitol was added at 10 to 500 mmol/L or sucrose was added at 10 to 250 mmol/L or preservation solutions to which no sugar was added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1. For comparative examples, preservation solutions to which the phenylboronic acid and sugar were not added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner. The results are listed in Table 5. As clearly understood from Table 5, in any of the samples of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the samples containing feces was improved depending on the added concentration of sorbitol or sucrose and became constant with addition at 25 mmol/L or more.












TABLE 5










Recovery ratio with respect to Hb



Hb concentration (μg/L)
concentration after 0 days (%)












Phenyl-boronic

Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.


















acid (mmol/L)
Sugar (mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days
0 days
7 days
14 days
21 days





















Feces 1
No addition
No addition
282
135
99
71
100
48
35
25



15
No addition
302
243
239
224
100
80
79
74


















Sorbitol
10
305
280
269
259
100
92
88
85




25
301
288
289
276
100
96
96
92




50
291
300
300
296
100
103
103
102




100
287
292
294
290
100
102
102
101




500
251
251
256
251
100
100
102
100



Sucrose
10
304
273
264
249
100
90
87
82




25
287
281
266
261
100
98
93
91




50
291
281
274
268
100
97
94
92




100
286
272
270
258
100
95
94
90




250
258
250
241
232
100
97
93
90

















Feces 2
No addition
No addition
292
111
68
50
100
38
23
17



15
No addition
283
249
214
191
100
88
76
67


















Sorbitol
10
289
262
225
197
100
91
78
68




25
283
277
245
213
100
98
87
75




50
281
280
252
222
100
100
90
79




100
274
276
246
219
100
101
90
80




500
256
250
226
204
100
98
88
80



Sucrose
10
286
270
237
213
100
94
83
74




25
287
274
241
223
100
95
84
78




50
273
266
232
212
100
97
85
78




100
267
257
236
219
100
96
88
82




250
245
235
216
193
100
96
88
79

















Feces 3
No addition
No addition
286
93
60
51
100
33
21
18



15
No addition
288
224
200
185
100
78
69
64


















Sorbitol
10
279
233
210
201
100
84
75
72




25
285
240
225
213
100
84
79
75




50
283
250
235
223
100
88
83
79




100
278
244
226
219
100
88
81
79




500
246
221
203
199
100
90
83
81



Sucrose
10
286
227
205
195
100
79
72
68




25
272
228
203
192
100
84
75
71




50
286
234
209
195
100
82
73
68




100
272
230
201
187
100
85
74
69




250
248
213
189
176
100
86
76
71

















No
No addition
No addition
268
243
238
239
100
91
89
89


feces
15
No addition
286
262
253
264
100
92
88
92


















Sorbitol
10
284
261
249
257
100
92
88
90




25
287
261
250
265
100
91
87
92




50
281
261
251
265
100
93
89
94




100
276
252
244
255
100
91
88
92




500
242
227
218
230
100
94
90
95



Sucrose
10
274
258
251
268
100
94
92
98




25
277
262
252
268
100
95
91
97




50
271
253
246
257
100
93
91
95




100
267
247
241
260
100
93
90
97




250
238
227
221
235
100
95
93
99










Example 6

Preservation solutions were prepared through adding 3-carboxyphenylboronic acid (3-CPBA), 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid (3-HPBA), and 3-aminophenylboronic acid (3-APBA) each at 15 mmol/L as substitute for the phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 1 and adding sorbitol, sucrose, or mannitol at 100 mmol/L, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1. For comparative examples, preservation solutions to which no arylboronic acid was added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner. The results are listed in Table 6. As clearly understood from Table 6, also when other arylboronic acids were used, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the sample was further improved in any of fecal specimens of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3 if sorbitol, sucrose, or mannitol was further added, and it has been recognized that the stability of hemoglobin in the samples containing feces can be synergistically enhanced.














TABLE 6












Recovery ratio with respect to Hb





Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)



Arylboronic

Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
















acid (15 mmol/L)
Sugar (100 mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
0 days
7 days
14 days



















Feces 1
No addition
No addition
315
154
119
100
49
38



3C-PBA
No addition
309
249
239
100
81
77



3C-PBA
Sorbitol
305
299
305
100
98
100



3C-PBA
Sucrose
285
260
268
100
91
94



3C-PBA
Mannitol
301
280
306
100
93
102



3H-PBA
No addition
327
269
268
100
82
82



3H-PBA
Sorbitol
310
309
303
100
100
98



3H-PBA
Sucrose
311
267
278
100
86
89



3H-PBA
Mannitol
314
302
298
100
96
95



3A-PBA
No addition
339
275
260
100
81
77



3A-PBA
Sorbitol
327
316
310
100
97
95


Feces 2
No addition
No addition
313
108
78
100
34
25



3C-PBA
No addition
309
264
240
100
85
78



3C-PBA
Sorbitol
302
283
260
100
94
86



3C-PBA
Sucrose
286
260
240
100
91
84



3C-PBA
Mannitol
304
290
282
100
95
93



3H-PBA
No addition
326
277
264
100
85
81



3H-PBA
Sorbitol
313
304
288
100
97
92



3H-PBA
Sucrose
310
272
262
100
88
84



3H-PBA
Mannitol
315
300
297
100
95
94



3A-PBA
No addition
330
287
261
100
87
79



3A-PBA
Sorbitol
315
295
277
100
94
88


Feces 3
No addition
No addition
304
90
63
100
30
21



3C-PBA
No addition
300
213
200
100
71
67



3C-PBA
Sorbitol
293
251
239
100
85
81



3C-PBA
Sucrose
283
226
214
100
80
76



3C-PBA
Mannitol
294
241
234
100
82
80



3H-PBA
No addition
313
213
206
100
68
66



3H-PBA
Sorbitol
295
241
229
100
82
78



3H-PBA
Sucrose
289
226
210
100
78
73



3H-PBA
Mannitol
299
248
241
100
83
81



3A-PBA
No addition
324
227
209
100
70
64



3A-PBA
Sorbitol
313
258
246
100
82
79


No
No addition
No addition
295
276
267
100
94
91


feces
3C-PBA
No addition
293
281
276
100
96
94



3C-PBA
Sorbitol
288
280
271
100
97
94



3C-PBA
Sucrose
271
263
257
100
97
95



3C-PBA
Mannitol
285
271
267
100
95
94



3H-PBA
No addition
303
294
296
100
97
98



3H-PBA
Sorbitol
300
292
291
100
97
97



3H-PBA
Sucrose
283
279
278
100
99
98



3H-PBA
Mannitol
296
289
288
100
98
97



3A-PBA
No addition
278
275
272
100
99
98



3A-PBA
Sorbitol
278
275
272
100
99
98









Example 7

Preservation solutions were prepared through setting the concentration of phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 1 to 0 to 50 mmol/L and adding sorbitol or mannitol at 100 mmol/L, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1. The results are listed in Table 7. As clearly understood from Table 7, in the preservation solutions to which a sugar was added, decrease in the apparent recovery ratios was not observed even when the phenylboronic acid was added at 50 mmol/L. This appears to be because the arylboronic acid has the property of inhibiting the immunoagglutination reaction (at high concentrations), but the existence of a high concentration of the arylboronic acid adversely affects the immunological measurement method to deteriorate the apparent recovery ratio, while on the other hand, when a high concentration of sugar further coexists, the arylboronic acid and the sugar form a complex thereby to suppress the adverse effects of a high concentration of the arylboronic acid on the immunological measurement method.














TABLE 7












Recovery ratio with respect to Hb





Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)



Phenyl-boronic

Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
Number of days for preservation at 37° C.
















acid (mmol/L)
Sugar (100 mmol/L)
0 days
7 days
14 days
0 days
7 days
14 days



















Feces 1
No addition
No addition
315
154
119
100
49
38



0.5
Sorbitol
310
206
178
100
66
57



15

301
297
295
100
99
98



50

281
274
275
100
98
98



15
Mannitol
301
288
287
100
96
95



50

270
257
255
100
95
95



No addition
No addition
313
108
78
100
34
25


Feces 2
0.5

301
173
154
100
57
51



15
Sorbitol
299
300
298
100
100
100



50

275
279
284
100
101
103



15
Mannitol
298
284
284
100
95
95



50

268
263
274
100
98
102


Feces 3
No addition
No addition
304
90
63
100
30
21



0.5

294
163
145
100
55
49



15
Sorbitol
292
246
233
100
84
80



50

273
247
230
100
90
84



15
Mannitol
288
231
220
100
80
76



50

254
233
226
100
92
89


No
No addition
No addition
295
276
267
100
94
91


feces
0.5

291
277
273
100
95
94



15
Sorbitol
288
274
268
100
95
93



50

290
295
293
100
102
101



15
Mannitol
287
272
269
100
95
94



50

254
242
241
100
95
95









Example 8

Preservation solutions were prepared with the addition of 40 mmol/L HEPES (pH 6.8), 0.1% BSA, 0.1% NaN3, and 0 to 2.5 mmol/L phenylboronic acid. In addition, preservation solutions were also prepared by adding of 0.5 mmol/L 3-carboxyphenylboronic acid (3-CPBA), 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid (3-HPBA), and 3-aminophenylboronic acid (3-APBA) respectively as substitute for the phenylboronic acid. Samples obtained by adding hemoglobin-added fecal specimens to the preservation solutions so that the fecal concentration would be 0.5% were preserved at 37° C. for 0, 16, 38, and 62 hours. The fecal specimens were added with hemoglobin having an amount such that the hemoglobin concentration in the samples would be about 300 μg/L. Instead of the fecal specimens to which hemoglobin was added, samples containing no fecal specimens, in which hemoglobin was added to the preservation solutions so that the hemoglobin concentration in the samples would be 300 μg/L, were similarly preserved. The hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations (μg/L) in the preserved samples were measured by the latex agglutination method using the same measurement reagent and measurement device as in Example 1.


In the present example, the preservation solutions contain no haptoglobin, so the hemoglobin is decomposed earlier than in Examples 1 to 7, but the stabilizing effect of the arylboronic acid on the hemoglobin was also recognized in the present example. That is, as clearly understood from Table 8, in any of samples of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the sample was improved by adding arylboronic acid at a concentration of 0.25 mmol/L or more. Most of the hemoglobin in the samples is recognized to exist without forming a complex with haptoglobin because no haptoglobin is contained in the preservation solutions unlike Examples 1 to 7. The above results therefore mean that the arylboronic acid also stabilized the hemoglobin which did not form a complex with haptoglobin.











TABLE 8









Recovery ratio with respect to Hb










Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)











Arylboronic
Preservation time at 37° C.
Preservation time at 37° C.

















acid (mmol/L)
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h




















Feces 1
No addition
309
146
39
2
100
47
13
1


















PBA
0.25
295
172
74
24
100
58
25
8




0.5
300
174
74
17
100
58
25
6




1
298
182
92
30
100
61
31
10




2.5
294
177
80
23
100
60
27
8



3-CPBA
0.5
296
163
68
20
100
55
23
7



3-HPBA
0.5
298
171
79
25
100
57
26
8



3-APBA
0.5
318
178
92
31
100
56
29
10
















Feces 2
No addition
282
54
0
0
100
19
0
0


















PBA
0.25
298
103
10
0
100
35
3
0




0.5
299
103
10
0
100
34
3
0




1
299
119
17
0
100
40
6
0




2.5
299
124
18
0
100
41
6
0



3-CPBA
0.5
288
90
8
0
100
31
3
0



3-HPBA
0.5
295
95
11
0
100
32
4
0



3-APBA
0.5
303
89
4
0
100
29
1
0
















Feces 3
No addition
277
36
0
0
100
13
0
0


















PBA
0.25
284
92
8
0
100
32
3
0




0.5
289
92
8
0
100
32
3
0




1
287
112
14
0
100
39
5
0




2.5
293
119
18
0
100
41
6
0



3-CPBA
0.5
281
95
5
0
100
34
2
0



3-HPBA
0.5
295
106
9
0
100
36
3
0



3-APBA
0.5
298
94
4
0
100
31
1
0
















No
No addition
303
274
252
240
100
91
83
79

















feces
PBA
0.25
303
281
263
265
100
93
87
88




0.5
295
284
270
263
100
96
91
89




1
292
276
261
259
100
95
90
89




2.5
291
273
257
259
100
94
88
89



3-CPBA
0.5
299
279
264
266
100
94
88
89



3-HPBA
0.5
306
282
263
264
100
92
86
86



3-APBA
0.5
312
291
274
274
100
93
88
88









Example 9

The concentration of phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 8 was fixed to 0.5 mmol/L, preservation solutions to which sorbitol or sucrose was further added at 10 to 250 mmol/L or trehalose, glucose, fructose, or mannitol was further added at 50 to 100 mmol/L were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 8. In addition, preservation solutions to which the phenylboronic acid was added but no sugar was added were prepared, preservation solutions to which the phenylboronic acid and sugar were not added were prepared for the comparative examples, and testing was conducted in the same manner. The results are listed in Tables 9A and 9B. As clearly understood from Tables 9A and 9B, even in the preservation solutions containing no haptoglobin, when the phenylboronic acid was further added with sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, glucose, fructose, or mannitol, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the sample was further improved in any of fecal specimens of Feces 1, Feces 2, and Feces 3. Moreover, even when a sugar is added to the preservation solutions containing no phenylboronic acid, the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the samples containing fecal specimens is not improved. These results indicate that even with the preservation solutions containing no haptoglobin, a synergistic effect between the phenylboronic acid and various sugars can be obtained as in Examples 2 to 7.












TABLE 9A










Recovery ratio with respect to Hb



Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)












Phenyl-boronic

Preservation time at 37° C.
Preservation time at 37° C.


















acid (mmol/L)
Sugar (mmol/L)
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h





















Feces 1
No addition
No addition
309
146
39
2
100
47
13
1



0.5
No addition
300
174
74
17
100
58
25
6



















0.5
Sorbitol
10
300
179
81
20
100
60
27
7



0.5

50
290
175
81
21
100
61
28
7



0.5

100
289
177
90
28
100
61
31
10



0.5

250
277
182
105
45
100
65
38
16



No addition

100
290
146
39
1
100
50
13
0



0.5
Sucrose
10
294
169
79
28
100
57
27
9



0.5

50
284
173
92
34
100
61
33
12



0.5

100
273
166
88
31
100
61
32
11



0.5

250
249
167
97
43
100
67
39
17



No addition

100
271
137
45
10
100
51
16
4



0.5
Trehalose
50
285
168
81
26
100
59
28
9



0.5

100
272
164
78
27
100
61
29
10



No addition

100
268
133
41
8
100
50
15
3



0.5
Glucose
50
282
176
84
27
100
63
30
10



0.5

100
278
178
92
32
100
64
33
12



No addition

100
281
136
32
0
100
49
12
0



0.5
Fructose
50
286
182
102
41
100
64
36
14



0.5

100
290
185
105
46
100
64
36
16



No addition

100
281
134
35
0
100
48
12
0



0.5
Mannitol
50
279
176
90
34
100
63
32
12



0.5

100
277
173
91
32
100
62
33
12



No addition

100
276
131
29
1
100
48
10
0

















Feces 2
No addition
No addition
282
54
0
0
100
19
0
0



0.5
No addition
299
103
10
0
100
34
3
0



















0.5
Sorbitol
10
299
102
8
0
100
34
3
0



0.5

50
292
107
10
0
100
37
4
0



0.5

100
288
110
15
0
100
38
5
0



0.5

250
275
117
20
0
100
43
7
0



No addition

100
275
61
0
0
100
22
0
0



0.5
Sucrose
10
297
100
15
0
100
34
5
0



0.5

50
282
106
17
0
100
38
6
0



0.5

100
276
107
19
0
100
39
7
0



0.5

250
249
107
23
0
100
43
9
0



No addition

100
255
57
3
0
100
22
1
0



0.5
Trehalose
50
278
97
14
0
100
35
5
0



0.5

100
267
102
15
0
100
38
6
0



No addition

100
254
54
1
0
100
21
0
0



0.5
Glucose
50
281
102
10
0
100
36
4
0



0.5

100
278
105
8
0
100
38
3
0



No addition

100
256
54
0
0
100
21
0
0



0.5
Fructose
50
290
114
20
0
100
39
7
0



0.5

100
283
116
21
0
100
41
7
0



No addition

100
268
60
1
0
100
22
0
0



0.5
Mannitol
50
287
115
21
0
100
40
7
0



0.5

100
284
116
23
0
100
41
8
0



No addition

100
266
55
1
0
100
21
0
0




















TABLE 9B










Recovery ratio with respect to Hb



Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)












Phenyl-boronic

Preservation time at 37° C.
Preservation time at 37° C.


















acid (mmol/L)
Sugar (mmol/L)
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h





















Feces 3
No addition
No addition
277
36
0
0
100
13
0
0



0.5
No addition
289
92
8
0
100
32
3
0



















0.5
Sorbitol
10
294
105
12
0
100
36
4
0



0.5

50
296
111
15
0
100
38
5
0



0.5

100
285
124
19
1
100
43
7
0



0.5

250
274
134
25
2
100
49
9
1



No addition

100
277
49
1
0
100
18
0
0



0.5
Sucrose
10
294
114
13
0
100
39
4
0



0.5

50
286
110
11
0
100
38
4
0



0.5

100
268
102
9
0
100
38
3
0



0.5

250
244
114
17
0
100
47
7
0



No addition

100
257
67
0
0
100
26
0
0



0.5
Trehalose
50
279
96
8
0
100
34
3
0



0.5

100
264
91
7
0
100
35
3
0



No addition

100
260
48
0
0
100
19
0
0



0.5
Glucose
50
285
112
15
0
100
39
5
0



0.5

100
276
110
16
0
100
40
6
0



No addition

100
270
46
1
0
100
17
0
0



0.5
Fructose
50
286
119
16
0
100
42
6
0



0.5

100
288
130
22
0
100
45
8
0



No addition

100
263
51
0
0
100
19
0
0



0.5

100
288
96
6
0
100
33
2
0



No addition

100
269
57
0
0
100
21
0
0

















No
No addition
No addition
303
274
252
240
100
91
83
79


feces
0.5
No addition
295
284
270
263
100
96
91
89



















0.5
Sorbitol
10
296
277
263
259
100
94
89
87



0.5

50
290
273
250
252
100
94
86
87



0.5

100
289
266
247
255
100
92
86
88



0.5

250
276
262
245
245
100
95
89
89



No addition

100
300
263
245
235
100
88
82
79



0.5
Sucrose
10
304
271
255
258
100
89
84
85



0.5

50
293
272
251
251
100
93
86
86



0.5

100
278
260
244
249
100
93
88
89



0.5

250
258
241
228
226
100
93
88
88



No addition

100
278
245
229
224
100
88
83
81



0.5
Trehalose
50
284
260
249
253
100
91
88
89



0.5

100
276
254
246
242
100
92
89
88



No addition

100
280
241
228
219
100
86
81
78



0.5
Glucose
50
292
272
260
257
100
93
89
88



0.5

100
287
267
255
254
100
93
89
89



No addition

100
283
256
230
218
100
90
81
77



0.5
Fructose
50
296
271
254
256
100
91
86
86



0.5

100
292
265
254
262
100
91
87
90



No addition

100
284
246
233
230
100
86
82
81



0.5
Mannitol
50
292
273
255
259
100
94
87
89



0.5

100
285
266
250
259
100
93
87
91



No addition

100
281
254
237
235
100
91
84
84










Preservation solutions were prepared through fixing the concentration of phenylboronic acid in the preservation solutions of Example 8 to 0.5 mmol/L, adding of 0.5 mmol/L 3-carboxyphenylboronic acid (3-CPBA), 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid (3-HPBA), and 3-aminophenylboronic acid (3-APBA) respectively as substitute for the phenylboronic acid, and adding sorbitol or sucrose at 100 mmol/L, and testing was conducted in the same manner as in Example 8. For comparative examples, preservation solutions to which no arylboronic acid was added were prepared, and testing was conducted in the same manner. The results are listed in Table 10. As clearly understood from Table 10, even with the preservation solutions containing no haptoglobin, the combined use of various arylboronic acids and sugars further improve the recovery ratio of hemoglobin in the samples, and it has been recognized that the stability of hemoglobin in the samples containing feces can be synergistically enhanced.














TABLE 10












Recovery ratio with respect to Hb





Hb concentration (μg/L)
after 0 days (%)



Arylboronic

Preservation time at 37° C.
Preservation time at 37° C.


















acid (0.5 mmol/L)
Sugar (100 mmol/L)
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h
0 h
16 h
38 h
62 h





















Feces 1
No addition
No addition
309
146
39
2
100
47
13
1



PBA
No addition
300
174
74
17
100
58
25
6




Sorbitol
289
177
90
28
100
61
31
10




Sucrose
273
166
88
31
100
61
32
11



3-CPBA
No addition
296
163
68
20
100
55
23
7




Sorbitol
290
173
89
31
100
59
30
11




Sucrose
274
160
64
15
100
58
23
6



3-HPBA
No addition
298
171
79
25
100
57
26
8




Sorbitol
295
195
118
56
100
66
40
19




Sucrose
278
170
86
28
100
61
31
10



3-APBA
No addition
318
178
92
31
100
56
29
10




Sorbitol
293
177
97
36
100
60
33
12




Sucrose
277
168
75
21
100
61
27
8


Feces 2
No addition
No addition
282
54
0
0
100
19
0
0



PBA
No addition
299
103
10
0
100
34
3
0




Sorbitol
288
110
15
0
100
38
5
0




Sucrose
276
107
19
0
100
39
7
0



3-CPBA
No addition
288
90
8
0
100
31
3
0




Sorbitol
283
99
13
0
100
35
4
0




Sucrose
265
86
6
0
100
32
2
0



3-HPBA
No addition
295
95
11
0
100
32
4
0




Sorbitol
288
100
14
0
100
35
5
0




Sucrose
262
95
9
0
100
36
3
0



3-APBA
No addition
303
89
4
0
100
29
1
0




Sorbitol
286
103
14
0
100
36
5
0




Sucrose
270
91
9
0
100
34
3
0


Feces 3
No addition
No addition
277
36
0
0
100
13
0
0



PBA
No addition
289
92
8
0
100
32
3
0




Sorbitol
285
124
19
1
100
43
7
0




Sucrose
268
102
9
0
100
38
3
0



3-CPBA
No addition
281
95
5
0
100
34
2
0




Sorbitol
283
117
15
0
100
41
5
0




Sucrose
267
92
9
0
100
34
4
0



3-HPBA
No addition
295
106
9
0
100
36
3
0




Sorbitol
287
113
12
0
100
39
4
0




Sucrose
266
94
8
0
100
35
3
0



3-APBA
No addition
298
94
4
0
100
31
1
0




Sorbitol
284
116
10
0
100
41
4
0




Sucrose
273
99
13
0
100
36
5
0


No
No addition
No addition
303
274
252
240
100
91
83
79


feces
PBA
No addition
295
284
270
263
100
96
91
89




Sorbitol
289
266
247
255
100
92
86
88




Sucrose
278
260
244
249
100
93
88
89



3-CPBA
No addition
299
279
264
266
100
94
88
89




Sorbitol
287
271
253
254
100
94
88
89




Sucrose
281
254
246
247
100
91
88
88



3-HPBA
No addition
306
282
263
264
100
92
86
86




Sorbitol
294
273
259
259
100
93
88
88




Sucrose
276
261
248
248
100
95
90
90



3-APBA
No addition
312
291
274
274
100
93
88
88




Sorbitol
300
279
265
268
100
93
88
89




Sucrose
293
227
261
257
100
94
89
88








Claims
  • 1. A method of stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, the method comprising a step of causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid and a sugar in a solution, wherein the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid and derivatives thereof.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, hydroxyphenylboronic acid, carboxyphenylboronic acid, aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body to coexist with an arylboronic acid comprises dispersing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body in a solution containing the arylboronic acid, anda concentration of the arylboronic acid in the solution is 0.1 mmol/L or more.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sugar is at least one selected from the group consisting of sugar alcohol, monosaccharide, and disaccharide.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sugar is at least one selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, glucose, mannitol, fructose, xylitol, erythritol, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, and maltose.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the causing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body to coexist with the arylboronic acid and a sugar comprises dispersing the protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body in the solution containing the arylboronic acid and the sugar, anda concentration of the sugar in the solution is 5 mmol/L or more.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the specimen derived from the living body contains at least hemoglobin, andthe method further comprises bringing the hemoglobin and haptoglobin into contact with each other to form a complex of hemoglobin and haptoglobin.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the specimen derived from the living body is feces, saliva, or urine.
  • 10. A stabilizing solution for stabilizing a protein contained in a specimen derived from a living body, wherein the stabilizing solution comprises an arylboronic acid, a sugar, andthe protein contained in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.
  • 11. The stabilizing solution according to claim 10, wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid and derivatives thereof.
  • 12. The stabilizing solution according to claim 10, wherein the arylboronic acid is at least one selected from the group consisting of phenylboronic acid, hydroxyphenylboronic acid, carboxyphenylboronic acid, aminophenylboronic acid, and salts thereof.
  • 13. The stabilizing solution according to claim 10, wherein the sugar is at least one selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, glucose, mannitol, fructose, xylitol, erythritol, sucrose, trehalose, lactose, and maltose.
  • 14. The stabilizing solution according to claim 10, comprising haptoglobin.
  • 15. The stabilizing solution according to claim 10, wherein the specimen is feces, saliva, or urine.
  • 16. The stabilizing solution according to claim 10, wherein the stabilizing solution is a solution for preserving the specimen derived from the living body.
  • 17. A method of detecting a protein in a specimen derived from a living body, the method comprising: adding the specimen derived from the living body to the stabilizing solution according to claim 11 to obtain a sample containing the specimen; anddetecting the protein in the sample by an immunological measurement method, whereinthe protein in the specimen derived from the living body is at least one selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, haptoglobin, and a hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex.
  • 18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the specimen derived from the living body contains at least hemoglobin, andthe hemoglobin in the sample forms a complex together with haptoglobin.
  • 19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the stabilizing solution further comprises haptoglobin.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2018-037227 Mar 2018 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2019/007867 2/28/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/168109 9/6/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
4861772 Merz Aug 1989 A
8445719 Sugo May 2013 B2
20110174621 Yonehara Jul 2011 A1
20190056328 Olivo Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0997527 Jun 2010 EP
2204648 Nov 2016 EP
2353797 Mar 2001 GB
S63243756 Oct 1988 JP
8262020 Oct 1996 JP
9224942 Sep 1997 JP
H10132824 May 1998 JP
2000206117 Jul 2000 JP
2000258420 Sep 2000 JP
2009097956 May 2009 JP
2016191580 Nov 2016 JP
2011058958 May 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Search report in corresponding EP19761056.1 dated Jan. 31, 2022 (pp. 1-9).
International Search Report PCT/JP2019/007867 dated May 28, 2019 (pp. 1-4).
Frantzen et al., “Protein-boronic acid conjugates and their binding to low-molecularmass cis-diols and glycated hemoglobin” , Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1995, 670(1), pp. 37-45.
Office Action in corresponding Taiwanese Application No. 108107034 dated Apr. 8, 2022 (pp. 1-3).
Office Action in corresponding CN 201980016412.5 dated Jul. 1, 2023 (pp. 1-9).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200407425 A1 Dec 2020 US