Method of synthesis and testing of combinatorial libraries using microcapsules

Description

The present invention relates to methods for use in the synthesis and identification of molecules which bind to a target component of a biochemical system or modulate the activity of a target.

Over the past decade, high-throughput screening (HTS) of compound libraries has become a cornerstone technology of pharmaceutical research. Investment into HTS is substantial. A current estimate is that biological screening and preclinical pharmacological testing alone account for ˜14% of the total research and development (R&D) expenditures of the pharmaceutical industry (Handen, Summer 2002). HTS has seen significant improvements in recent years, driven by a need to reduce operating costs and increase the number of compounds and targets that can be screened. Conventional 96-well plates have now largely been replaced by 384-well, 1536-well and even 3456-well formats. This, combined with commercially available plate-handling robotics allows the screening of 100,000 assays per day, or more, and significantly cuts costs per assay due to the miniaturisation of the assays.

HTS is complemented by several other developments. Combinatorial chemistry is a potent technology for creating large numbers of structurally related compounds for HTS. Currently, combinatorial synthesis mostly involves spatially resolved parallel synthesis. The number of compounds that can be synthesised is limited to hundreds or thousands but the compounds can be synthesised on a scale of milligrams or tens of milligrams, enabling full characterisation and even purification. Larger libraries can be synthesised using split synthesis on beads to generate one-bead-one compound libraries. This method is much less widely adopted due to a series of limitations including: the need for solid phase synthesis; difficulties characterising the final products (due to the shear numbers and small scale); the small amounts of compound on a bead being only sufficient for one or a few assays; the difficulty in identifying the structure of a hit compound, which often relies on tagging or encoding methods and complicates both synthesis and analysis. Despite this split synthesis and single bead analysis still has promise. Recently there have been significant developments in miniaturised screening and single bead analysis. For example, printing techniques allow protein-binding assays to be performed on a slide containing 10,800 compound spots, each of 1 nl volume (Hergenrother et al., 2000). Combichem has so far, however, generated only a limited number of lead compounds. As of April 2000, only 10 compounds with a combinatorial chemistry history had entered clinical development and all but three of these are (oligo)nucleotides or peptides (Adang and Hermkens, 2001). Indeed, despite enormous investments in both HTS and combinatorial chemistry during the past decade the number of new drugs introduced per year has remained constant at best.

Dynamic combinatorial chemistry (DCC) can also be used to create dynamic combinatorial libraries (DCLs) from a set of reversibly interchanging components, however the sizes of libraries created and screened to date are still fairly limited (≤40,000) (Ramstrom and Lehn, 2002).

Virtual screening (VS) (Lyne, 2002), in which large compound bases are searched using computational approaches to identify a subset of candidate molecules for testing may also be very useful when integrated with HTS. However, there are to date few studies that directly compare the performance of VS and HTS, and further validation is required.

Despite all these developments, current screening throughput is still far from adequate. Recent estimates of the number of individual genes in the human genome (˜30,000) and the number of unique chemical structures theoretically attainable using existing chemistries suggests that an enormous number of assays would be required to completely map the structure-activity space for all potential therapeutic targets (Burbaum, 1998).

Hence, a method with the capability to both create and screen vast numbers (≥10¹⁰) of compounds quickly, using reaction volumes of only a few femtoliters, and at very low cost should be of enormous utility in the generation of novel drug leads.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention, in a first aspect, provides a method for preparing a repertoire of compounds comprising the steps of:

(a) compartmentalising two or more sets of primary compounds into microcapsules; such that a proportion of the microcapsules contains multiple copies of one or more compounds representative of each of said sets, and wherein said one or more compounds represents a subset of the set of primary compounds; and
(b) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets.

A compound is “representative” of a set where is member of said set; advantageously, therefore, each microcapsule contains compound(s) from each set. Although a microcapsule may contain more than one different compound from each set, it contains only a proportion of said set—i.e. a subset. The subset of a set advantageously represents no more that 10% of the members of the set; preferably, this figure is 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1% or less.

Most advantageously a microcapsule contains only a single compound from each set of primary compounds.

The sets of primary compounds used in the method of the invention can consist of any number of different compounds. At least a first set comprises two or more compounds; but the other set may be a single compound. Preferably, if a first set is a single compound, at least one further set comprises a repertoire of compounds. The larger this repertoire, the greater the number of different secondary compounds that will be generated.

Preferably, at least one set of compounds comprises a repertoire of different compounds. At least one set, however, may consist of a single compound, such that secondary compounds are all constructed based on or containing the single compound used in one set. The greater the number of sets, and the greater the diversity of each set, the greater the final diversity of the secondary compounds generated.

Advantageously, in step (a) the number of different compounds per compartment will be equivalent to the number of primary compounds forming the secondary compound in step (b).

In a second aspect, the invention provides a method for identifying primary compounds which react together to form secondary compounds capable of binding to or modulating the activity of a target, comprising the steps of:

(a) compartmentalising two or more sets of primary compounds into microcapsules; such that a proportion of the microcapsules contains two or more compounds;
(b) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
(c) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

In a third aspect, the invention provides a method for synthesising compounds with enhanced ability to bind to or modulate the activity of the target, comprising the steps of:

(a) compartmentalising into microcapsules subsets of primary compounds identified in step (c) of the second aspect of the invention and, optionally, compartmentalising additional sets of primary compounds;
(b) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
(c) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

Advantageously, steps (a) to (c) can be repeated, but after the first cycle, step (a) comprises compartmentalising subsets of primary compounds identified in step (c) into microcapsules and, optionally, compartmentalising additional sets of compounds.

In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a method for identifying individual compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target, comprising the steps of:

(a) compartmentalising into microcapsules a primary compound identified in step (c) of the second or third aspect of the invention and additional sets of primary compounds;
(b) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
(c) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

If the secondary compound is formed by the chemical reaction between more than two primary compounds it can be identified by iteratively repeating steps (a) to (c), but after the first cycle, step (c) comprises compartmentalising the primary compound identified in step (c) of the second or third aspect of the invention, a primary compound identified in step (c) of each of the previous cycles (of the fourth aspect of the invention) and additional sets of primary molecules.

Preferably, the desired activity is selected from the group consisting of a binding activity and the modulation of the activity of a target. Advantageously, the target is compartmentalised into microcapsules together with the compounds.

Sets of compounds may be compartmentalised in different ways to achieve encapsulation of multiple copies of two or more compounds into microcapsules.

For example, small aliquots of an aqueous solution of each compound can be deposited into an oil phase (advantageously containing surfactants and/or other stabilising molecules) whilst applying mechanical energy, thereby dispersing each compound into multiple aqueous microcapsules, each of which contains (for the most part) a single sort of compound but multiple copies thereof. Advantageously, the compounds can be deposited into the oil phase in the form of droplets generated using inkjet printing technology (Calvert, 2001; de Gans et al., 2004), and more advantageously by piezoelectric drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet printing technology. Inkjet printing technology can be used to mix primary compounds and, optionally, other reagents (e.g the target and reagents to assay target activity) immediately prior to forming the emulsion. Advantageously, multiple compounds can be mixed with multiple targets in a combinatorial manner.

Thus, step (a) above can be modified such that it comprises forming separate emulsion compartments containing two or more compounds and mixing the emulsion compartments to form an emulsified compound repertoire wherein a subset of the repertoire is represented in multiple copies in any one microcapsule.

Moreover, compound libraries can be compartmentalised in highly monodisperse microcapsules produced using microfluidic techniques. For example, aliquots of each compound can be compartmentalised into one or more aqueous microcapsules (with less than 3% polydispersity) in water-in-oil emulsions created by droplet break off in a co-flowing steam of oil (Umbanhowar et al., 2000). Advantageously, the aqueous microcapsules are then transported by laminar-flow in a stream of oil in microfluidic channels (Thorsen et al., 2001). The microcapsules containing single compounds can, optionally, be split into two or more smaller microcapsules using microfluidics (Link et al., 2004; Song et al., 2003). Microcapsules containing primary compounds can be fused with other microcapsules (Song et al., 2003) to form secondary compounds. Microcapsules containing compounds can also, optionally, be fused with microcapsules containing a target. A single microcapsule containing a target can, optionally, be split into two or more smaller microcapsules which can subsequently be fused with microcapsules containing different compounds, or compounds at different concentrations. Advantageously, a compound and a target can be mixed by microcapsule fusion prior to a second microcapsule fusion which delivers the reagents necessary to assay the activity of the target (e.g. the substrate for the target if the target is an enzyme). This allows time for the compound to bind to the target. The microcapsules can be analysed and, optionally, sorted using microfluidic devices (Fu et al., 2002).

In a further aspect, there is provided a method for preparing a repertoire of compounds comprising the steps of:

(a) attaching two or more sets of primary compounds onto microbeads;
(b) compartmentalising the microbeads into microcapsules such that a proportion of the microcapsules contains two or more microbeads;
(c) releasing at least one of the sets of primary compounds from the microbeads;
(d) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets.

Advantageously, the compounds are cleavable from the beads. Where more than two sets of compounds are used, all the sets with the exception of one are cleavable; preferably, they are all cleavable. The compounds may be attached to the microbeads by photochemically cleavable linkers.

In a still further aspect, the invention provides a method for identifying primary compounds which react together to form secondary compounds capable of binding to or modulating the activity of a target, comprising the steps of

(a) attaching two or more sets of primary compounds onto microbeads;
(b) compartmentalising the microbeads into microcapsules together with the target such that many compartments contain two or more microbeads;
(c) releasing the primary compounds from the microbeads;
(d) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
(e) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

Advantageously, in step (b) the modal number of microbeads per compartment will be equivalent to the number of primary compounds forming the secondary compound in step (d).

In a further aspect, the invention provides a method for synthesising compounds with enhanced ability to bind to or modulate the activity of the target, comprising the steps of:

(a) attaching onto microbeads subsets of primary compounds identified in step (e) of the second aspect of the invention and, optionally, attaching additional sets of primary compounds;
(b) compartmentalising the microbeads into microcapsules together with the target such that many compartments contain two or more microbeads;
(c) releasing the primary compounds from the microbeads;
(d) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
(e) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

Advantageously, steps (a) to (e) can be repeated, but after the first cycle, step (a) comprises attaching onto microbeads subsets of primary compounds identified in step (e) and, optionally, attaching additional sets of compounds.

In a further aspect, the invention provides a method for identifying individual compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target, comprising the steps of:

(a) attaching onto microbeads a primary compound identified in step (e) of the second or third aspect of the invention and additional sets of primary compounds;
(b) compartmentalising the microbeads into microcapsules together with the target such that many compartments contain two or more microbeads;
(c) releasing the primary compounds from the microbeads;
(d) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
(e) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target;

If the secondary compound is formed by the chemical reaction between more than two primary compounds it can be identified by iteratively repeating steps (a) to (e), but after the first cycle, step (a) comprises attaching onto microbeads the primary compound identified in step (e) of the second or third aspect of the invention, a primary compound identified in step (e) of each of the previous cycles (of the fourth aspect of the invention) and additional sets of primary molecules.

According to a preferred implementation of the present invention, the compounds may be screened according to an activity of the compound or derivative thereof which makes the microcapsule detectable as a whole. Accordingly, the invention provides a method wherein a compound with the desired activity induces a change in the microcapsule, or a modification of one or more molecules within the microcapsule, which enables the microcapsule containing the compound and, optionally, the microbead carrying it to be identified. In this embodiment, therefore, the microcapsules are either: (a) physically sorted from each other according to the activity of the compound(s) contained therein, and the contents of the sorted microcapsules analysed to determine the identity of the compound(s) which they contain; or (b) analysed directly without sorting to determine the identity of the compound(s) which the microcapsules contain.

According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the screening of compounds may be performed by, for example:

(I) In a first embodiment, the microcapsules are screened according to an activity of the compound or derivative thereof which makes the microcapsule detectable as a whole. Accordingly, the invention provides a method wherein a compound with the desired activity induces a change in the microcapsule, or a modification of one or more molecules within the microcapsule, which enables the microcapsule containing the compound and the microbead carrying it to be identified. In this embodiment, therefore, the microcapsules are either: (a) physically sorted from each other according to the activity of the compound(s) contained therein, the contents of the sorted microcapsules optionally pooled into one or more common compartments, and the microcapsule contents analysed to determine the identity of the compound(s); or (b) analysed directly without sorting to determine the identity of the compound(s) which the microcapsules contained. Where the microcapsule contains microbeads, the microbeads can be analysed to determine the compounds with which they are coated.
(II) In a second embodiment, microbeads are analysed following pooling of the microcapsules into one or more common compartments. In this embodiment, a compound having the desired activity modifies the microbead which carried it (and which resides in the same microcapsule) in such a way as to make it identifiable in a subsequent step. The reactions are stopped and the microcapsules are then broken so that all the contents of the individual microcapsules are pooled. Modified microbeads are identified and either: (a) physically sorted from each other according to the activity of the compound(s) coated on the microbeads, and the sorted microbeads analysed to determine the identity of the compound(s) with which they are/were coated; or (b) analysed directly without sorting to determine the identity of the compound(s) with which the microbeads are/were coated. It is to be understood, of course, that modification of the microbead may be direct, in that it is caused by the direct action of the compound, or indirect, in which a series of reactions, one or more of which involve the compound having the desired activity, leads to modification of the microbead. Advantageously, the target is bound to the microbead and is a ligand and the compound within the microcapsule binds, directly or indirectly, to said ligand to enable the isolation of the microbead. In another configuration, a substrate for the target is and is bound to the microbead, and the activity of the compound within the microcapsule results, directly or indirectly, in the conversion of said substrate into a product which remains part of the microbead and enables its isolation. Alternatively, the activity of the compound may prevent or inhibit the conversion of said substrate into product. Moreover, the product of the activity of the compound within the microcapsule can result, directly or indirectly, in the generation of a product which is subsequently complexed with the microbead and enables its identification.
(III) In a third embodiment, the microbeads are analysed following pooling of the microcapsules into one or more common compartments. In this embodiment, a compound with a desired activity induces a change in the microcapsule containing the compound and the microbead which carries it. This change, when detected, triggers the modification of the microbead within the compartment. The reactions are stopped and the microcapsules are then broken so that all the contents of the individual microcapsules are pooled. Modified microbeads are identified and either: (a) physically sorted from each other according to the activity of the compound(s) coated on the microbeads, and the sorted microbeads analysed to determine the identity of the compound(s) with which they are/were coated; or (b) analysed directly without sorting to determine the identity of the compound(s) with which the microbeads are/were coated.

The microcapsules or microbeads may be modified by the action of the compound(s) such as to change their optical properties. For example, the modification of the microbead can enable it to be further modified outside the microcapsule so as to induce a change in its optical properties.

In another embodiment, the change in optical properties of the microcapsules or microbeads is due to binding of a compound with distinctive optical properties to the target.

Moreover, the change in optical properties of the microcapsules or microbeads can be due to binding of a target with distinctive optical properties by the compound.

The change in the optical properties of the micro capsule may be due to modulation of the activity of the target by the compound. The compound may activate or inhibit the activity of the target. For example, if the target is an enzyme, the substrate and the product of the reaction catalysed by the target can have different optical properties. Advantageously, the substrate and product have different fluorescence properties. In the case where the microcapsules contain microbeads, both the substrate and the product can have similar optical properties, but only the product of the reaction, and not the substrate, binds to, or reacts with, the microbead, thereby changing the optical properties of the microbead.

The change in optical properties of the microcapsules or microbeads can also be due to the different optical properties of the target and the product of the reaction being selected. Where both target and product have similar optical properties, only the product of the reaction being selected, and not the target, binds to, or reacts with, the microbead, thereby changing the optical properties of the microcapsules or microbeads.

In a further configuration, further reagents specifically bind to, or specifically react with, the product (and not the substrate) attached to or contained in the microcapsule or microbead, thereby altering the optical properties of the microcapsule or microbead

Advantageously, microcapsules or microbeads are modified directly or indirectly by the activity of the compound are further modified by Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA™; NEN), resulting directly or indirectly in a change in the optical properties of said microcapsules or microbeads thereby enabling their separation.

It is to be understood that the detected change in the compartment may be caused by the direct action of the compound, or indirect action, in which a series of reactions, one or more of which involve the compound having the desired activity leads to the detected change.

Where the compounds are attached to beads, the density with which compounds are coated onto the microbeads, combined with the size of the microcapsule will determine the concentration of the compound in the micro capsule. High compound coating densities and small microcapsules will both give higher compound concentrations which may be advantageous for the selection of molecules with a low affinity for the target. Conversely, low compound coating densities and large microcapsules will both give lower compound concentrations which may be advantageous for the selection of molecules with a high affinity for the target.

Preferably, microencapsulation is achieved by forming an emulsion.

The microbead can be nonmagnetic, magnetic or paramagnetic.

Advantageously, the microcapsules or microbeads are analysed by detection of a change in their fluorescence. For example, microbeads can be analysed by flow cytometry and, optionally sorted using a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS). The different fluorescence properties of the target and the product can be due to fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).

In a further embodiment, the internal environment of the microcapsules can be modified by the addition of one or more reagents to the continuous phase of the emulsion. This allows reagents to be diffused in to the microcapsules during the reaction, if necessary.

The invention moreover relates to a method according to the preceding aspects, further comprising the step of isolating the secondary compound produced by reaction of the primary compounds and optionally further comprising the step of manufacturing one or more secondary compounds.

The invention also provides for a product when identified according to the invention. As used in this context, a “product” may refer to any compound, selectable according to the invention.

Further embodiments of the invention are described in the detailed description below and in the accompanying claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1. Examples of PTP1B inhibitors. Compounds with a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (e.g. 2) have significantly more potency than those with a single moiety (e.g. 1).

FIG. 2. Screening PTP1B inhibitors using IVC. Polystyrene beads with surface carboxylate groups, died with orange or red fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997), are derivatised with a phosphopeptide PTP1B substrate, and either PTP1B inhibitors or non-inhibitory compounds, attached via a cleavable linker (1). After mixing the beads, single beads and target enzyme (PTP1B) are colocalised in a microcompartment by forming a water-in-oil emulsion (2). The compound is released (photochemically) (3). Inhibitors reduce the amount of substrate converted to product (dephosphorylated peptide) (4). The enzyme reaction is stopped and the emulsion is broken (5). After labelling with green fluorescent anti-substrate antibodies, beads are analysed by 3-colour flow cytometry to simultaneously determine extent of inhibition and the compound on the beads (6). Compound libraries can be coupled to optically tagged beads (see below) and rapidly decoded by flow cytometry (at up to 100,000 beads s⁻¹). Hit compounds are re-synthesised for further characterisation (7) or elaborated and rescreened in a process of synthetic evolution (8).

FIG. 3. Synthesising PTP1B inhibitors in an emulsion. Two types of beads are created, differentially labelled with orange and red fluorochromes, and derivatised with two types of molecule, A or B (neither, one, or both of which contain a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety), attached via a reversible connection (a Schiff base). Beads are emulsified to give, on average, two beads per compartment. The molecules, A & B, are released from the beads in the compartment and react to form a new molecule, A-B, (in solution). If A-B is a PTP1B inhibitor the PTP1B substrate also on the beads is not dephosphorylated and these beads identified by flow cytometry as FIG. 2.

FIG. 4. Small molecule evolution using four-component reactions. Four sets of 25 beads are created, each derivatised with one of 25 variants of molecules A, B, C or D, emulsified to give, on average, 4 beads per compartment, the compounds released to synthesise a large combinatorial repertoire (4×10⁵) in situ and screened as FIG. 2. Low affinity inhibitors will be ‘recombined’ by re-screening mixtures of beads carrying moieties identified in inhibitors. Beads carrying a moiety found in inhibitors (e.g. A₁₀) can also be mixed with complete sets of beads coated with B, C and D and screened. If a moiety (say B₈) is then identified as a component of an inhibitor, beads coated with A₁₀and B₈can be mixed with complete sets of beads C and D and the process repeated. This process of ‘mutation’ also results in deconvolution. After fixing three of the four moieties in active compounds, deconvolution can be completed using multiplex bead analysis as above. Compounds can be re-diversified or ‘mutated’ using bead sets carrying variant, exploded sets of the molecules used in the original libraries.

FIG. 5. Compartmentalisation of small molecules in water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Water-in-perfluorooctyl bromide emulsions were made containing texas red (1 mM) and calcein (1 mM) in the aqueous phase by homogenisation as described in example 6 The two emulsions were mixed by vortexing and imaged by epifluorescence microscopy after 24 hours. No exchange of texas-red (red fluorescence) and calcein (green fluorescence) between microdroplets could be observed.

FIG. 6. Primary compounds for the synthesis of PTP1B inhibitors. An amine (A) and an aldehyde (B) with difluoromethylene phosphonate moieties. Amine A reacts with aldehyde B in the aqueous microcapsules of a water-in-oil emulsion to generate the imine C which is a potent PTP1B inhibitor. C can be reduced in situ using cyanoborohydride to generate the stable amine D.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Definitions

The term “microcapsule” is used herein in accordance with the meaning normally assigned thereto in the art and further described hereinbelow. In essence, however, a microcapsule is an artificial compartment whose delimiting borders restrict the exchange of the components of the molecular mechanisms described herein which allow the identification of the molecule with the desired activity. The delimiting borders preferably completely enclose the contents of the microcapsule. Preferably, the microcapsules used in the method of the present invention will be capable of being produced in very large numbers, and thereby to compartmentalise a library of compounds. Optionally, the compounds can be attached to microbeads. The microcapsules used herein allow mixing and sorting to be performed thereon, in order to facilitate the high throughput potential of the methods of the invention. Arrays of liquid droplets on solid surfaces, and multiwell plates, are not microcapsules as defined herein.

A “proportion” of the microcapsules, which is defined as comprising two or more compounds, or two or microbeads, is any fraction of the microcapsules in question, including all of said microcapsules. Advantageously, it is at least 25% thereof, preferably 50%, and more preferably 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or 95%.

The term “microbead” is used herein in accordance with the meaning normally assigned thereto in the art and further described hereinbelow. Microbeads, are also known by those skilled in the art as microspheres, latex particles, beads, or minibeads, are available in diameters from 20 nm to 1 mm and can be made from a variety of materials including silica and a variety of polymers, copolymers and terpolymers. Highly uniform derivatised and non-derivatised nonmagnetic and paramagnetic microparticles (beads) are commercially available from many sources (e.g. Sigma, Bangs Laboratories, Luminex and Molecular Probes) (Fornusek and Vetvicka, 1986).

Microbeads can be “compartmentalised” in accordance with the present invention by distribution into microcapsules. For example, in a preferred aspect the microbeads can be placed in a water/oil mixture and emulsified to form a water-in-oil emulsion comprising microcapsules according to the invention. The concentration of the microbeads can be adjusted to control the number of microbeads, which on average, appear in each microcapsule.

The term “compound” is used herein in accordance with the meaning normally assigned thereto in the art. The term compound is used in its broadest sense i.e. a substance comprising two or more elements in fixed proportions, including molecules and supramolecular complexes. This definition includes small molecules (typically <500 Daltons) which make up the majority of pharmaceuticals. However, the definition also includes larger molecules, including polymers, for example polypeptides, nucleic acids and carbohydrates, and supramolecular complexes thereof.

The term “primary compound” is used herein to indicate a compound which is compartmentalised in a microcapsule or coupled to a bead.

The term “secondary compound” is used herein to indicate a compound which is formed by the reaction between two or more primary compounds in a microcapsule, optionally after the release of at least one of the primary molecules from a microbead. Advantageously, all primary molecules are released from the microbeads. The secondary compound may be the result of a covalent or non-covalent reaction between the primary compounds.

The term “scaffold” is used herein in accordance with the meaning normally assigned thereto in the art. That is to say a core portion of a molecule common to all members of a combinatorial library (Maclean et al., 1999). Secondary compounds may optionally comprise scaffolds.

A “repertoire” of compounds is a group of diverse compounds, which may also be referred to as a library of compounds. Repertoires of compounds may be generated by any means known in the art, including combinatorial chemistry, compound evolution, or purchased from commercial sources such as Sigma Aldrich, Discovery Partners International, Maybridge and Tripos. A repertoire advantageously comprises at least 10², 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶, 10⁷, 10⁸, 10⁹, 10¹⁰, 10¹¹or more different compounds, which may be related or unrelated in structure or function.

A “set” of compounds may be a repertoire of compounds or any part of a repertoire, including a single compound species. The invention envisages the use of two or more sets of compounds, which are reacted together. The sets may be derived from a single repertoire, or a plurality of different repertoires.

Compounds can be “released” from a microbead by cleavage of a linker which effects the attachment of the compound to the microbead. Release of the compounds from the microbead allows the compounds to interact more freely with other contents of the microcapsule, and to be involved in reactions therein and optionally to become combined with other reagents to form new compounds, complexes, molecules or supramolecular complexes. Cleavage of linkers can be performed by any means, with means such as photochemical cleavage which can be effected from without the microcapsule being preferred. Photochemically cleavable linkers are known in the art (see for example (Gordon and Balasubramanian, 1999)) and further described below.

As used herein, the “target” is any compound, molecule, or supramolecular complex. Typical targets include targets of medical significance, including drug targets such as receptors, for example G protein coupled receptors and hormone receptors; transcription factors, protein kinases and phosphatases involved in signalling pathways; gene products specific to microorganisms, such as components of cell walls, replicases and other enzymes; industrially relevant targets, such as enzymes used in the food industry, reagents intended for research or production purposes, and the like.

An “activity”, as referred to herein in connection with the modulation of an activity of a target, can be any activity of the target or an activity of a molecule which is influenced by the target, which is modulatable directly or indirectly by a compound or compounds as assayed herein. The activity of the target may be any measurable biological or chemical activity, including binding activity, an enzymatic activity, an activating or inhibitory activity on a third enzyme or other molecule, the ability to cause disease or influence metabolism or other functions, and the like. Activation and inhibition, as referred to herein, denote the increase or decrease of a desired activity 1.5 fold, 2 fold, 3 fold, 4 fold, 5 fold, 10 fold, 100 fold or more. Where the modulation is inactivation, the inactivation can be substantially complete inactivation. The desired activity may moreover be purely a binding activity, which may or may not involve the modulation of the activity of the target bound to.

A compound defined herein as “low molecular weight” or a “small molecule” is a molecule commonly referred to in the pharmaceutical arts as a “small molecule”. Such compounds are smaller than polypeptides and other, large molecular complexes and can be easily administered to and assimilated by patients and other subjects. Small molecule drugs can advantageously be formulated for oral administration or intramuscular injection. For example, a small molecule may have a molecular weight of up to 2000 Dalton; preferably up to 1000 Dalton; advantageously between 250 and 750 Dalton; and more preferably less than 500 Dalton.

A “selectable change” is any change which can be measured and acted upon to identify or isolate the compound which causes it. The selection may take place at the level of the microcapsule, the microbead, or the compound itself, optionally when complexed with another reagent. A particularly advantageous embodiment is optical detection, in which the selectable change is a change in optical properties, which can be detected and acted upon for instance in a FACS device to separate microcapsules or microbeads displaying the desired change.

As used herein, a change in optical properties refers to any change in absorption or emission of electromagnetic radiation, including changes in absorbance, luminescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence. All such properties are included in the term “optical”. Microcapsules or microbeads can be identified and, optionally, sorted, for example, by luminescence, fluorescence or phosphorescence activated sorting. In a preferred embodiment, flow cytometry is employed to identify and, optionally, sort microcapsules or microbeads. A variety of optical properties can be used for analysis and to trigger sorting, including light scattering (Kerker, 1983) and fluorescence polarisation (Rolland et al., 1985). In a highly preferred embodiment microcapsules or microbeads are analysed and, optionally, sorted using a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) (Norman, 1930; Mackenzie and Pinder, 1936).

The compounds in microcapsules or on beads can be identified using a variety of techniques familiar to those skilled in the art, including mass spectroscopy, chemical tagging or optical tagging.

General Techniques

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art (e.g., in cell culture, molecular genetics, nucleic acid chemistry, hybridisation techniques and biochemistry). Standard techniques are used for molecular, genetic and biochemical methods (see generally, Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2d ed. (1989) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. and Ausubel et al., Short Protocols in Molecular Biology (1999) 4^thEd, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. which are incorporated herein by reference) and chemical methods. In addition Harlow & Lane, A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., is referred to for standard Immunological Techniques.

(A) General Description

The microcapsules of the present invention require appropriate physical properties to allow the working of the invention.

First, to ensure that the compounds and the target may not diffuse between microcapsules, the contents of each microcapsule must be isolated from the contents of the surrounding microcapsules, so that there is no or little exchange of compounds and target between the microcapsules over the timescale of the experiment.

Second, the method of the present invention requires that there are only a limited number of beads per microcapsule. This ensures that the compounds and the target will be isolated from other beads.

Third, the formation and the composition of the microcapsules must not abolish the activity of the target.

Consequently, any microencapsulation system used must fulfill these three requirements. The appropriate system(s) may vary depending on the precise nature of the requirements in each application of the invention, as will be apparent to the skilled person.

A wide variety of microencapsulation procedures are available (see Benita, 1996) and may be used to create the microcapsules used in accordance with the present invention. Indeed, more than 200 microencapsulation methods have been identified in the literature (Finch, 1993).

These include membrane enveloped aqueous vesicles such as lipid vesicles (liposomes) (New, 1990) and non-ionic surfactant vesicles (van Hal et al., 1996). These are closed-membranous capsules of single or multiple bilayers of non-covalently assembled molecules, with each bilayer separated from its neighbour by an aqueous compartment. In the case of liposomes the membrane is composed of lipid molecules; these are usually phospholipids but sterols such as cholesterol may also be incorporated into the membranes (New, 1990). A variety of enzyme-catalysed biochemical reactions, including RNA and DNA polymerisation, can be performed within liposomes (Chakrabarti et al., 1994; Oberholzer et al., 1995a; Oberholzer et al., 1995b; Walde et al., 1994; Wick & Luisi, 1996).

With a membrane-enveloped vesicle system much of the aqueous phase is outside the vesicles and is therefore non-compartmentalised. This continuous, aqueous phase should be removed or the biological systems in it inhibited or destroyed in order that the reactions are limited to the microcapsules (Luisi et al., 1987).

Enzyme-catalysed biochemical reactions have also been demonstrated in microcapsules generated by a variety of other methods. Many enzymes are active in reverse micellar solutions (Bru & Walde, 1991; Bru & Walde, 1993; Creagh et al., 1993; Haber et al., 1993; Kumar et al., 1989; Luisi & B., 1987; Mao & Walde, 1991; Mao et al., 1992; Perez et al., 1992; Walde et al., 1994; Walde et al., 1993; Walde et al., 1988) such as the AOT-isooctane-water system (Menger & Yamada, 1979).

Microcapsules can also be generated by interfacial polymerisation and interfacial complexation (Whateley, 1996). Microcapsules of this sort can have rigid, nonpermeable membranes, or semipermeable membranes. Semipermeable microcapsules bordered by cellulose nitrate membranes, polyamide membranes and lipid-polyamide membranes can all support biochemical reactions, including multienzyme systems (Chang, 1987; Chang, 1992; Lim, 1984). Alginate/polylysine microcapsules (Lim & Sun, 1980), which can be formed under very mild conditions, have also proven to be very biocompatible, providing, for example, an effective method of encapsulating living cells and tissues (Chang, 1992; Sun et al., 1992).

Non-membranous microencapsulation systems based on phase partitioning of an aqueous environment in a colloidal system, such as an emulsion, may also be used.

Preferably, the microcapsules of the present invention are formed from emulsions; heterogeneous systems of two immiscible liquid phases with one of the phases dispersed in the other as droplets of microscopic or colloidal size (Becher, 1957; Sherman, 1968; Lissant, 1974; Lissant, 1984).

Emulsions may be produced from any suitable combination of immiscible liquids. Preferably the emulsion of the present invention has water (containing the biochemical components) as the phase present in the form of finely divided droplets (the disperse, internal or discontinuous phase) and a hydrophobic, immiscible liquid (an oil’) as the matrix in which these droplets are suspended (the nondisperse, continuous or external phase). Such emulsions are termed water-in-oil’ (W/O). This has the advantage that the entire aqueous phase containing the biochemical components is compartmentalised in discreet droplets (the internal phase). The external phase, being a hydrophobic oil, generally contains none of the biochemical components and hence is inert.

The emulsion may be stabilised by addition of one or more surface-active agents (surfactants). These surfactants are termed emulsifying agents and act at the water/oil interface to prevent (or at least delay) separation of the phases. Many oils and many emulsifiers can be used for the generation of water-in-oil emulsions; a recent compilation listed over 16,000 surfactants, many of which are used as emulsifying agents (Ash and Ash, 1993). Suitable oils include light white mineral oil and decane. Suitable surfactants include: non-ionic surfactants (Schick, 1966) such as sorbitan monooleate (Span™ 80; ICI), sorbitan monostearate (Span™ 60; ICI), polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate (Tween™ 80; ICI), and octylphenoxyethoxyethanol (Triton X-100); ionic surfactants such as sodium cholate and sodium taurocholate and sodium deoxycholate; chemically inert silicone-based surfactants such as polysiloxane-polycetyl-polyethylene glycol copolymer (Cetyl Dimethicone Copolyol) (e.g. Abil™ EM90; Goldschmidt); and cholesterol.

Emulsions with a fluorocarbon (or perfluorocarbon) continuous phase (Krafft et al., 2003; Riess, 2002) may be particularly advantageous. For example, stable water-in-perfluorooctyl bromide and water-in-perfluorooctylethane emulsions can be formed using F-alkyl dimorpholinophosphates as surfactants (Sadtler et al., 1996). Non-fluorinated compounds are essentially insoluble in fluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons (Curran, 1998; Hildebrand and Cochran, 1949; Hudlicky, 1992; Scott, 1948; Studer et al., 1997) and small drug-like molecules (typically <500 Da and Log P<5) (Lipinski et al., 2001) are compartmentalised very effectively in the aqueous microcapsules of water-in-fluorocarbon and water-in-perfluorocarbon emulsions—with little or no exchange between microcapsules.

Advantageously, compounds can be compartmentalised in microcapsules comprising non-aqueous (organic) solvents. Non-fluorinated organic solvents are essentially insoluble and immiscible with fluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons (Curran, 1998; Hildebrand and Cochran, 1949; Hudlicky, 1992; Scott, 1948; Studer et al., 1997) allowing the formation of emulsions with a fluorocarbon (or perfluorocarbon) continuous phase and a discontinous phase formed from a non-aqueous solvent such as dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, and ethanol. The ability to form secondary compounds in microcapsules comprising non-aqueous solvents greatly expands the repertoire of chemical reactions that can be performed and secondary molecules that can be synthesised therein. Most of synthetic organic chemistry is carried out in organic solvents including dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, and ethanol. Organic molecules dissolve better in organic solvents. Electrostatic interactions are enhanced in organic solvents (due to the low dielectric constant), whereas they can be solvated and made less reactive in aqueous solvents. For example, much of contemporary organic chemistry involves reactions relating to carbonyl chemistry, including the use of metal enolates. Likewise for a growing number of other organometallic interactions. These reactions are often carried out under an inert atmosphere in anhydrous solvents (otherwise the reagents would be quenched by water). There are also a large number of reactions which use palladium catalysis including the Suzuki reaction and the Heck reaction.

Creation of an emulsion generally requires the application of mechanical energy to force the phases together. There are a variety of ways of doing this which utilise a variety of mechanical devices, including stirrers (such as magnetic stir-bars, propeller and turbine stirrers, paddle devices and whisks), homogenisers (including rotor-stator homogenisers, high-pressure valve homogenisers and jet homogenisers), colloid mills, ultrasound and ‘membrane emulsification’ devices (Becher, 1957; Dickinson, 1994).

Complicated biochemical processes, notably gene transcription and translation are also active in aqueous microcapsules formed in water-in-oil emulsions. This has enabled compartmentalisation in water-in-oil emulsions to be used for the selection of genes, which are transcribed and translated in emulsion microcapsules and selected by the binding or catalytic activities of the proteins they encode (Doi and Yanagawa, 1999; Griffiths and Tawfik, 2003; Lee et al., 2002; Sepp et al., 2002; Tawfik and Griffiths, 1998). This was possible because the aqueous microcapsules formed in the emulsion were generally stable with little if any exchange of nucleic acids, proteins, or the products of enzyme catalysed reactions between microcapsules.

The technology exists to create emulsions with volumes all the way up to industrial scales of thousands of liters (Becher, 1957; Sherman, 1968; Lissant, 1974; Lissant, 1984).

The preferred microcapsule size will vary depending upon the precise requirements of any individual screening process that is to be performed according to the present invention. In all cases, there will be an optimal balance between the size of the compound library and the sensitivities of the assays to determine the identity of the compound and target activity.

The size of emulsion microcapsules may be varied simply by tailoring the emulsion conditions used to form the emulsion according to requirements of the screening system. The larger the microcapsule size, the larger is the volume that will be required to encapsulate a given compound library, since the ultimately limiting factor will be the size of the microcapsule and thus the number of microcapsules possible per unit volume.

Water-in-oil emulsions can be re-emulsified to create water-in-oil-in water double emulsions with an external (continuous) aqueous phase. These double emulsions can be analysed and, optionally, sorted using a flow cytometer (Bernath et al., 2004).

Highly monodisperse microcapsules can be produced using microfluidic techniques. For example, water-in-oil emulsions with less than 3% polydispersity can be generated by droplet break off in a co-flowing steam of oil (Umbanhowar et al., 2000). Microfluidic systems can also be used for laminar-flow of aqueous microdroplets dispersed in a stream of oil in microfluidic channels (Thorsen et al., 2001). This allows the construction of microfluidic devices for flow analysis and, optionally, flow sorting of microdroplets (Fu et al., 2002).

Microcapsules can, advantageously, be fused or split. For example, aqueous microdroplets can be merged and split using microfluidics systems (Link et al., 2004; Song et al., 2003). Microcapsule fusion allows the mixing of reagents. Fusion, for example, of a microcapsule containing the target with a microcapsule containing the compound could initiate the reaction between target and compound. Microcapsule splitting allows single microcapsules to be split into two or more smaller microcapsules. For example a single microcapsule containing a compound can be split into multiple microcapsules which can then each be fused with a different microcapsule containing a different target. A single microcapsule containing a target can also be split into multiple microcapsules which can then each be fused with a different microcapsule containing a different compound, or compounds at different concentrations.

Microcapsules can be optically tagged by, for example, incorporating fluorochromes. In a preferred configuration, the microcapsules are optically tagged by incorporating quantum dots: quantum dots of 6 colours at 10 concentrations would allow the encoding of 10⁶microcapsules (Han et al., 2001). Microcapsules flowing in an ordered sequence in a microfluidic channel can be encoded (wholly or partially) by their sequence in the stream of microcapsules (positional encoding).

Microbeads, also known by those skilled in the art as microspheres, latex particles, beads, or minibeads, are available in diameters from 20 nm to 1 mm and can be made from a variety of materials including silica and a variety of polymers, copolymers and terpolymers including polystyrene (PS), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyvinyltoluene (PVT), styrene/butadiene (SB) copolymer, and styrene/vinyltoluene (S/VT) copolymer (www.bangslabs.com). They are available with a variety of surface chemistries from hydrophobic surfaces (e.g. plain polystyrene), to very hydrophilic surfaces imparted by a wide variety of functional surface groups: aldehyde, aliphatic amine, amide, aromatic amine, carboxylic acid, chloromethyl, epoxy, hydrazide, hydroxyl, sulfonate and tosyl. The functional groups permit a wide range of covalent coupling reactions for stable or reversible attachment of compounds to the microbead surface.

Microbeads can be optically tagged by, for example, incorporating fluorochromes. For example, one hundred different bead sets have been created, each with a unique spectral address due to labelling with precise ratios of red (>650 nm) and orange (585 nm) fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997) (www.luminex.com) and sets of up to 10⁶beads can be encoded by incorporating quantum dots of 10 intensities and 6 colours (Han et al., 2001).

The compounds can be connected to the microbeads either covalently or non-covalently by a variety of means that will be familiar to those skilled in the art (see, for example, (Hermanson, 1996)). Advantageously, the compounds are attached via a cleavable linker A variety of such linkers are familiar to those skilled in the art (see for example (Gordon and Balasubramanian, 1999)), including for example, linkers which can be cleaved photochemically and reversible covalent bonds which can be controlled by changing the pH (e.g. imines and acylhydrazones), by adjusting the oxido-reductive properties (e.g. disulphides), or using an external catalyst (e.g. cross-metathesis and transamidation).

The method of the present invention permits the identification of compounds which modulate the activity of the target in a desired way in pools (libraries or repertoires) of compounds.

In a highly preferred application, the method of the present invention is useful for screening libraries of compounds. The invention accordingly provides a method according to preceding aspects of the invention, wherein the compounds are identified from a library of compounds.

The compounds identified according to the invention are advantageously of pharmacological or industrial interest, including activators or inhibitors of biological systems, such as cellular signal transduction mechanisms suitable for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. In a preferred aspect, therefore, the invention permits the identification of clinically or industrially useful products. In a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a product when isolated by the method of the invention.

The selection of suitable encapsulation conditions is desirable. Depending on the complexity and size of the compound library to be screened, it may be beneficial to set up the encapsulation procedure such that one or less than one secondary compound is formed per microcapsule. This will provide the greatest power of resolution. Where the library is larger and/or more complex, however, this may be impracticable; it may be preferable to form several secondary compounds together and rely on repeated application of the method of the invention to identify the desired compound. A combination of encapsulation procedures may be used to identify the desired compound.

Theoretical studies indicate that the larger the number of compounds created the more likely it is that a compound will be created with the properties desired (see (Perelson and Oster, 1979) for a description of how this applies to repertoires of antibodies). It has also been confirmed practically that larger phage-antibody repertoires do indeed give rise to more antibodies with better binding affinities than smaller repertoires (Griffiths et al., 1994). To ensure that rare variants are generated and thus are capable of being identified, a large library size is desirable. Thus, the use of optimally small microcapsules is beneficial.

The largest repertoires of compounds that can be screened in a single experiment to date, using two dimensional microarrays of 1 nl volume spots, is ˜10³(Hergenrother et al., 2000). Using the present invention, at a microcapsule diameter of 2.6 mm (Tawfik and Griffiths, 1998), by forming a three-dimensional dispersion, a repertoire size of at least 10¹¹can be screened using 1 ml aqueous phase in a 20 ml emulsion.

In addition to the compounds, or microbeads coated with compounds, described above, the microcapsules according to the invention will comprise further components required for the screening process to take place. They will comprise the target and a suitable buffer. A suitable buffer will be one in which all of the desired components of the biological system are active and will therefore depend upon the requirements of each specific reaction system. Buffers suitable for biological and/or chemical reactions are known in the art and recipes provided in various laboratory texts, such as (Sambrook and Russell, 2001).

Other components of the system will comprise those necessary for assaying the activity of the target. These may for example comprise substrate(s) and cofactor(s) for a reaction catalysed by the target, and ligand(s) bound by the target. They may also comprise other catalysts (including enzymes), substrates and cofactors for reactions coupled to the activity of the target which allow for the activity of the target to be detected.

(B) Screening Procedures

To screen compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of a target, the target is compartmentalised in microcapsules together with one or more compounds or compound-coated microbeads. Advantageously each microcapsule contains only a single sort of secondary compound, but many copies thereof. Advantageously each microbead is coated with only a single sort of compound, but many copies thereof. Advantageously the compounds are connected to the microbeads via a cleavable linker, allowing them to be released from the microbeads in the compartments. Advantageously, each microcapsule or microbead is optically tagged to allow identification of the compounds contained within the microcapsule of attached to the microbead.

(i) Screening Binding

Compounds can be screened directly for binding to a target. In this embodiment, if the compound is attached to a microbead and has affinity for the target it will be bound by the target. At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds exhibiting the desired binding can be selected by affinity purification using a molecule that specifically binds to, or reacts specifically with, the target.

In an alternative embodiment, the target can be attached to microbeads by a variety of means familiar to those skilled in the art (see for example (Hermanson, 1996)). The compounds to be screened contain a common feature—a tag. The compounds are released from the microbeads and if the compound has affinity for the target, it will bind to it. At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds exhibiting the desired binding can be selected by affinity purification using a molecule that specifically binds to, or reacts specifically with, the “tag”.

In an alternative embodiment, microbeads may be screened on the basis that the compound, which binds to the target, merely hides the ligand from, for example, further binding partners. In this eventuality, the microbead, rather than being retained during an affinity purification step, may be selectively eluted whilst other microbeads are bound.

Sorting by affinity is dependent on the presence of two members of a binding pair in such conditions that binding may occur. Any binding pair may be used for this purpose. As used herein, the term binding pair refers to any pair of molecules capable of binding to one another. Examples of binding pairs that may be used in the present invention include an antigen and an antibody or fragment thereof capable of binding the antigen, the biotin-avidin/streptavidin pair (Savage et al., 1994), a calcium-dependent binding polypeptide and ligand thereof (e.g. calmodulin and a calmodulin-binding peptide (Montigiani et al., 1996; Stofko et al., 1992), pairs of polypeptides which assemble to form a leucine zipper (Tripet et al., 1996), histidines (typically hexahistidine peptides) and chelated Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺³⁰ and Ni²⁺, (e.g. Ni-NTA; (Hochuli et al., 1987)), RNA-binding and DNA-binding proteins (Klug, 1995) including those containing zinc-finger motifs (Klug and Schwabe, 1995) and DNA methyltransferases (Anderson, 1993), and their nucleic acid binding sites.

In an alternative embodiment, compounds can be screened for binding to a target using a change in the optical properties of the microcapsule or the microbead.

The change in optical properties of the microcapsule or the microbead after binding of the compound to the target may be induced in a variety of ways, including:

- (1) the compound itself may have distinctive optical properties, for example, it is fluorescent
- (2) the optical properties of the compound may be modified on binding to the target, for example, the fluorescence of the compound is quenched or enhanced on binding (Voss, 1993; Masui and Kuramitsu, 1998).
- (3) the optical properties of the target may be modified on binding of the compound, for example, the fluorescence of the target is quenched or enhanced on binding (Guixe et al., 1998; Qi and Grabowski, 1998)
- (4) the optical properties of both target and compound are modified on binding, for example, there can be a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from target to compound (or vice versa) resulting in emission at the “acceptor” emission wavelength when excitation is at the “donor” absorption wavelength (Heim & Tsien, 1996; Mahajan et al., 1998; Miyawaki et al., 1997).

The invention provides a method wherein a compound with the desired activity induces a change in the optical properties of the microcapsule, which enables the microcapsule containing the compound and the microbeads contained therein to be identified, and optionally, sorted.

In an alternative embodiment, the invention provides a method wherein microbeads are analysed following pooling of the microcapsules into one or more common compartments. In this embodiment, a compound having the desired activity modifies the optical properties of the microbead which carried it (and which resides in the same microcapsule) to allow it to be identified, and optionally, sorted.

In this embodiment, it is not necessary for binding of the compound to the target to directly induce a change in optical properties.

In this embodiment, if the compound attached to the microbead has affinity for the target it will be bound by the target. At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds exhibiting the desired binding can be identified by adding reagents that specifically bind to, or react specifically with, the target and thereby induce a change in the optical properties of the microbeads allowing their identification. For example, a fluorescently-labelled anti-target antibody can be used, or an anti-target antibody followed by a second fluorescently labelled antibody which binds the first.

In an alternative embodiment, the target can be attached to the microbeads by a variety of means familiar to those skilled in the art (see for example (Hermanson, 1996)). The compounds to be screened contain a common feature—a tag. The compounds are released from the microbeads and if the compound has affinity for the target, it will bind to it. At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds exhibiting the desired binding can be identified by adding reagents that specifically bind to, or react specifically with, the “tag” and thereby induce a change in the optical properties of the microbeads allowing their identification. For example, a fluorescently-labelled anti-“tag” antibody can be used, or an anti-“tag” antibody followed by a second fluorescently labelled antibody which binds the first.

In an alternative embodiment, microbeads may be identified on the basis that the gene product, which binds to the ligand, merely hides the ligand from, for example, further binding partners which would otherwise modify the optical properties of the microbeads. In this case microbeads with unmodified optical properties would be selected.

Fluorescence may be enhanced by the use of Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA™) amplification to make the microbeads fluorescent (Sepp et al., 2002). This involves peroxidase (linked to another compound) binding to the microbeads and catalysing the conversion of fluorescein-tyramine in to a free radical form which then reacts (locally) with the microbeads. Methods for performing TSA are known in the art, and kits are available commercially from NEN.

TSA may be configured such that it results in a direct increase in the fluorescence of the microbeads, or such that a ligand is attached to the microbeads which is bound by a second fluorescent molecule, or a sequence of molecules, one or more of which is fluorescent.

(ii) Screening for Regulation of Binding

In an alternative embodiment, the invention can be used to screen compounds which act to regulate a biochemical process. If the compound activates a binding activity of a target, a ligand for the target which is activated can be attached to microbeads by a variety of means familiar to those skilled in the art (see for example (Hermanson, 1996)). At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds exhibiting the desired binding can be selected by affinity purification using a molecule that specifically binds to, or reacts specifically with, the target.

In an alternative embodiment, microbeads may be screened on the basis that the compound inhibits the binding activity of a target. In this eventuality, the microbead, rather than being retained during an affinity purification step, may be selectively eluted whilst other microbeads are bound.

In an alternative embodiment, compounds can be screened for the ability to modulates a binding activity of a target using a change in the optical properties of the microcapsule or the microbead.

The change in optical properties of the microcapsule or the microbead after binding of the target to its ligand may be induced in a variety of ways, including:

- (1) the ligand itself may have distinctive optical properties, for example, it is fluorescent
- (2) the optical properties of the ligand may be modified on binding to the target, for example, the fluorescence of the ligand is quenched or enhanced on binding (Voss, 1993; Masui and Kuramitsu, 1998).
- (3) the optical properties of the target may be modified on binding of the ligand, for example, the fluorescence of the target is quenched or enhanced on binding (Guixe et al., 1998; Qi and Grabowski, 1998)
- (4) the optical properties of both target and ligand are modified on binding, for example, there can be a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from target to ligand (or vice versa) resulting in emission at the “acceptor” emission wavelength when excitation is at the “donor” absorption wavelength (Heim & Tsien, 1996; Mahajan et al., 1998; Miyawaki et al., 1997).

In this embodiment, it is not necessary for binding of the target to the ligand to directly induce a change in optical properties.

In this embodiment, if a ligand attached to the microbead has affinity for the target it will be bound by the target. At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds which modulate the binding activity can be identified by adding reagents that specifically bind to, or react specifically with, the target and thereby induce a change in the optical properties of the microbeads allowing their identification. For example, a fluorescently-labelled anti-target antibody can be used, or an anti-target antibody followed by a second fluorescently labelled antibody which binds the first.

In an alternative embodiment, the target can be attached to the microbeads by a variety of means familiar to those skilled in the art (see for example (Hermanson, 1996)). The ligand to be screened contains a feature—a tag. At the end of the reaction, all of the microcapsules are combined, and all microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads carrying compounds which modulate binding can be identified by adding reagents that specifically bind to, or react specifically with, the “tag” and thereby induce a change in the optical properties of the microbeads allowing their identification. For example, a fluorescently-labelled anti-“tag” antibody can be used, or an anti-“tag” antibody followed by a second fluorescently labelled antibody which binds the first.

Fluorescence may be enhanced by the use of Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA™) amplification to make the microbeads fluorescent (Sepp et al., 2002), as above.

(iii) Screening for Regulation of Catalysis

In an alternative embodiment, the invention provides a method wherein a compound with the desired activity induces a change in the optical properties of the microcapsule, which enables the microcapsule containing the compound and, optionally, the microbeads contained therein to be identified, and optionally, sorted. The optical properties of microcapsules can be modified by either:

- (a) the substrate and product of the regulated reaction having different optical properties (many fluorogenic enzyme substrates are available commercially, see for example (Haugland, 1996 and www.probes.com) including substrates for glycosidases, phosphatases, peptidases and proteases, or
- (b) the presence of reagents which specifically bind to, or react with, the product (or substrate) of the regulated reaction in the microcapsule and which thereby induce a change in the optical properties of the microcapsules allowing their identification.

A wide range of assays for screening libraries of compounds for those which modulate the activity of a target are based on detecting changes in optical properties and can be used to screen compounds according to this invention. Such assays are well known to those skilled in the art (see for example Haugland, 1996 and www.probes.com).

Alternatively, selection may be performed indirectly by coupling a first reaction to subsequent reactions that takes place in the same microcapsule. There are two general ways in which this may be performed. First, the product of the first reaction could be reacted with, or bound by, a molecule which does not react with the substrate(s) of the first reaction. A second, coupled reaction will only proceed in the presence of the product of the first reaction. A regulatory compound can then be identified by the properties of the product or substrate of the second reaction.

Alternatively, the product of the reaction being selected may be the substrate or cofactor for a second enzyme-catalysed reaction. The enzyme to catalyse the second reaction can be incorporated in the reaction mixture prior to microencapsulation. Only when the first reaction proceeds will the coupled enzyme generate an identifiable product.

This concept of coupling can be elaborated to incorporate multiple enzymes, each using as a substrate the product of the previous reaction. This allows for selection of regulators of enzymes that will not react with an immobilised substrate. It can also be designed to give increased sensitivity by signal amplification if a product of one reaction is a catalyst or a cofactor for a second reaction or series of reactions leading to a selectable product (for example, see (Johannsson, 1991; Johannsson and Bates, 1988). Furthermore an enzyme cascade system can be based on the production of an activator for an enzyme or the destruction of an enzyme inhibitor (see (Mize et al., 1989)). Coupling also has the advantage that a common screening system can be used for a whole group of enzymes which generate the same product and allows for the selection of regulation of complicated multi-step chemical transformations and pathways.

In an alternative embodiment, if the target is itself an enzyme, or regulates a biochemical process which is enzymatic, the microbead in each microcapsule may be coated with the substrate for the enzymatic reaction. The regulatory compound will determine the extent to which the substrate is converted into the product. At the end of the reaction the microbead is physically linked to the product of the catalysed reaction. When the microcapsules are combined and the reactants pooled, microbeads which were coated with activator compounds can be identified by any property specific to the product. If an inhibitor is desired, selection can be for a chemical property specific to the substrate of the regulated reaction.

It may also be desirable, in some cases, for the substrate not to be attached to the microbead. In this case the substrate would contain an inactive “tag” that requires a further step to activate it such as photoactivation (e.g. of a “caged” biotin analogue, (Pirrung and Huang, 1996; Sundberg et al., 1995)). After convertion of the substrate to product the “tag” is activated and the “tagged” substrate and/or product bound by a tag-binding molecule (e.g. avidin or streptavidin) attached to the microbead. The ratio of substrate to product attached to the nucleic acid via the “tag” will therefore reflect the ratio of the substrate and product in solution. A substrate tagged with caged biotin has been used to select for genes encoding enzymes with phosphotriesterase activity using a procedure based on compartmentalisation in microcapsules (Griffiths and Tawfik, 2003). The phosphotriesterase substrate was hydrolysed in solution in microcapsules containing active enzyme molecules, and after the reaction was completed, the caging group was released by irradiation to allow the product to bind, via the biotin moiety, to microbeads to which the gene encoding the enzyme was attached.

After the microbeads and the contents of the microcapsules are combined, those microbeads coated with regulators can be selected by affinity purification using a molecule (e.g. an antibody) that binds specifically to the product or substrate as appropriate.

In an alternative embodiment, the invention provides a method wherein the microbeads are analysed following pooling of the microcapsules into one or more common compartments. Microbeads coated with regulator compounds can be identified using changes in optical properties of the microbeads. The optical properties of microbeads with product (or substrate) attached can be modified by either:

- (1) the product-microbead complex having characteristic optical properties not found in the substrate-microbead complex, due to, for example;
  - (a) the substrate and product having different optical properties (many fluorogenic enzyme substrates are available commercially (see for example Haugland, 1996 and www.probes.com) including substrates for glycosidases, phosphatases, peptidases and proteases, or
  - (b) the substrate and product having similar optical properties, but only the product, and not the substrate binds to, or reacts with, the microbead;
- (2) adding reagents which specifically bind to, or react with, the product (or substrate) and which thereby induce a change in the optical properties of the microbeads allowing their identification (these reagents can be added before or after breaking the microcapsules and pooling the microbeads). The reagents;
  - (a) bind specifically to, or react specifically with, the product, and not the substrate, (or vice versa) if both substrate and product are attached to the microbeads, or
  - (b) optionally bind both substrate and product if only the product, and not the substrate binds to, or reacts with, the microbeads (or vice versa).

In this scenario, the substrate (or one of the substrates) can be present in each microcapsule unlinked to the microbead, but has a molecular “tag” (for example biotin, DIG or DNP or a fluorescent group). When the regulated enzyme converts the substrate to product, the product retains the “tag” and is then captured in the microcapsule by the product-specific antibody. When all reactions are stopped and the microcapsules are combined, these microbeads will be “tagged” and may already have changed optical properties, for example, if the “tag” was a fluorescent group. Alternatively, a change in optical properties of “tagged” microbeads can be induced by adding a fluorescently labelled ligand which binds the “tag” (for example fluorescently-labelled avidin/streptavidin, an anti-“tag” antibody which is fluorescent, or a non-fluorescent anti-“tag” antibody which can be detected by a second fluorescently-labelled antibody).

(iv) Screening for Compound Specificity/Selectivity

Compounds with specificity or selectivity for certain targets and not others can be specifically identified by carrying out a positive screen for regulation of a reaction using one substrate and a negative screen for regulation of a reaction with another substrate. For example, two substrates, specific for two different target enzymes, are each labelled with different fluorogenic moieties. Each target enzymes catalyse the generation of a product with a different fluorescence spectrum resulting in different optical properties of the microcapsules depending on the specificity of the compound for two targets.

(v) Screening Using Cells

In the current drug discovery paradigm, validated recombinant targets form the basis of in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. Isolated proteins cannot, however, be regarded as representative of complex biological systems; hence, cell-based systems can provide greater confidence in compound activity in an intact biological system. A wide range of cell-based assays for drug leads are known to those skilled in the art. Cells can be compartmentalised in microcapsules, such as the aqueous microdroplets of a water-in-oil emulsion (Ghadessy, 2001). The effect of a compound(s) on a target can be determined by compartmentalising a cell (or cells) in a microcapsule together with a compound(s) and using an appropriate cell-based assay to identify those compartments containing compounds with the desired effect on the cell(s). The use of water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions may be particularly advantageous: the high gas dissolving capacity of fluorocarbons can support the exchange of respiratory gases and has been reported to be beneficial to cell culture systems (Lowe, 2002).

(vi) Flow Cytometry

In a preferred embodiment of the invention the microcapsules or microbeads will be analysed and, optionally, sorted by flow cytometry. Many formats of microcapsule can be analysed and, optionally, sorted directly using flow cytometry. Some formats of microcapsule may require that the microcapsules be further processed before analysis or sorting. For example, water-in-oil emulsions can be converted into water-in-oil-in-water double emulsions to facilitate analysis by flow cytometry (Bernath et al., 2004). Multiple emulsions are prepared by the re-emulsification of a simple primary water-in-oil (or oil-in-water) emulsion to provide water-in-oil-in-water (or oil-in-water-in-oil) emulsions (Davis and Walker, 1987).

Highly monodisperse microcapsules can be produced using microfluidic techniques. For example, water-in-oil emulsions with less than 3% polydispersity can be generated by droplet break off in a co-flowing steam of oil (Umbanhowar, 2000). Microfluidic systems can also be used for laminar-flow of aqueous microdroplets dispersed in a stream of oil in microfluidic channels (Thorsen, 2001). This allows the construction of microfluidic devices for flow analysis and, optionally, flow sorting of microdroplets (Fu, 2002).

A variety of optical properties can be used for analysis and to trigger sorting, including light scattering (Kerker, 1983) and fluorescence polarisation (Rolland et al., 1985). In a highly preferred embodiment the difference in optical properties of the microcapsules or microbeads will be a difference in fluorescence and, if required, the microcapsules or microbeads will be sorted using a fluorescence activated cell sorter (Norman, 1980; Mackenzie and Pinder, 1986), or similar device. Flow cytometry has a series of advantages:

- (1) commercially available fluorescence activated cell sorting equipment from established manufacturers (e.g. Becton-Dickinson, Coulter, Cytomation) allows the analysis and sorting at up to 100,000 microcapsules or microbeads s⁻¹.
- (2) the fluorescence signal from each microcapsule or microbead corresponds tightly to the number of fluorescent molecules present. As little as few hundred fluorescent molecules per microcapsules or microbeads can be quantitatively detected;
- (3) the wide dynamic range of the fluorescence detectors (typically 4 log units) allows easy setting of the stringency of the sorting procedure, thus allowing the recovery of the optimal number microcapsules or microbeads from the starting pool (the gates can be set to separate microcapsules or microbeads with small differences in fluorescence or to only separate out microcapsules or microbeads with large differences in fluorescence, dependant on the selection being performed);
- (4) commercially available fluorescence-activated cell sorting equipment can perform simultaneous excitation and detection at multiple wavelengths (Shapiro, 1995) allowing positive and negative selections to be performed simultaneously by monitoring the labelling of the microcapsules or microbeads with two to thirteen (or more) fluorescent markers, for example, if substrates for two alternative targets are labelled with different fluorescent tags the microcapsules or microbeads can labelled with different fluorophores dependent on the target regulated.

If the microcapsules or microbeads are optically tagged, flow cytometry can also be used to identify the compound or compounds in the microcapsule or coated on the microbeads (see below). Optical tagging can also be used to identify the concentration of the compound in the microcapsule (if more than one concentration is used in a single experiment) or the number of compound molecules coated on a microbead (if more than one coating density is used in a single experiment). Furthermore, optical tagging can be used to identify the target in a microcapsule (if more than one target is used in a single experiment). This analysis can be performed simultaneously with measuring activity, after sorting of microcapsules containing microbeads, or after sorting of the microbeads.

(vii) Microcapsule Identification and Sorting

The invention provides for the identification and, optionally, the sorting of intact microcapsules where this is enabled by the sorting techniques being employed. Microcapsules may be identified and, optionally, sorted as such when the change induced by the desired compound either occurs or manifests itself at the surface of the microcapsule or is detectable from outside the microcapsule. The change may be caused by the direct action of the compound, or indirect, in which a series of reactions, one or more of which involve the compound having the desired activity leads to the change. For example, where the microcapsule is a membranous microcapsule, the microcapsule may be so configured that a component or components of the biochemical system comprising the target are displayed at its surface and thus accessible to reagents which can detect changes in the biochemical system regulated by the compound on the microbead within the microcapsule.

In a preferred aspect of the invention, however, microcapsule identification and, optionally, sorting relies on a change in the optical properties of the microcapsule, for example absorption or emission characteristics thereof, for example alteration in the optical properties of the microcapsule resulting from a reaction leading to changes in absorbance, luminescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence associated with the microcapsule. All such properties are included in the term “optical”. In such a case, microcapsules can be identified and, optionally, sorted by luminescence, fluorescence or phosphorescence activated sorting. In a highly preferred embodiment, flow cytometry is employed to analyse and, optionally, sort microcapsules containing compounds having a desired activity which result in the production of a fluorescent molecule in the microcapsule.

In an alternative embodiment, a change in microcapsule fluorescence, when identified, is used to trigger the modification of the microbead within the compartment. In a preferred aspect of the invention, microcapsule identification relies on a change in the optical properties of the microcapsule resulting from a reaction leading to luminescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence within the microcapsule. Modification of the microbead within the microcapsules would be triggered by identification of luminescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence. For example, identification of luminescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence can trigger bombardment of the compartment with photons (or other particles or waves) which leads to modification of the microbead or molecules attached to it. A similar procedure has been described previously for the rapid sorting of cells (Keij et al., 1994). Modification of the microbead may result, for example, from coupling a molecular “tag”, caged by a photolabile protecting group to the microbeads: bombardment with photons of an appropriate wavelength leads to the removal of the cage. Afterwards, all microcapsules are combined and the microbeads pooled together in one environment. Microbeads coated with compounds exhibiting the desired activity can be selected by affinity purification using a molecule that specifically binds to, or reacts specifically with, the “tag”.

(i) Primary Compounds Libraries

Libraries of primary compounds can be obtained from a variety of commercial sources. The compounds in the library can be made by a variety of means well known to those skilled in the art. Optionally, compound libraries can be made by combinatorial synthesis using spatially resolved parallel synthesis or using split synthesis, optionally to generate one-bead-one-compound libraries. The compounds can, optionally, be synthesised on beads. These beads can be compartmentalised in microcapsules directly or the compounds released before compartmentalisation.

Advantageously, only a single type of compound, but multiple copies thereof is present in each microcapsule.

The compounds can, optionally, be connected to microbeads either covalently or non-covalently by a variety of means that will be familiar to those skilled in the art (see, for example, (Hermanson, 1996)).

Microbeads are available with a variety of surface chemistries from hydrophobic surfaces (e.g. plain polystyrene), to very hydrophilic surfaces imparted by a wide variety of functional surface groups: aldehyde, aliphatic amine, amide, aromatic amine, carboxylic acid, chloromethyl, epoxy, hydrazide, hydroxyl, sulfonate and tosyl. The functional groups permit a wide range of covalent coupling reactions, well known to those skilled in the art, for stable or reversible attachment of compounds to the microbead surface.

Advantageously, the compounds are attached to the microbeads via a cleavable linker. A variety of such linkers are familiar to those skilled in the art (see for example (Gordon and Balasubramanian, 1999)), including for example, linkers which can be cleaved photochemically and reversible covalent bonds which can be controlled by changing the pH (e.g. imines and acylhydrazones), by adjusting the oxido-reductive properties (e.g. disulphides), or using an external catalyst (e.g. cross-metathesis and transamidation).

Advantageously, only a single type of compound, but multiple copies thereof is attached to each bead.

(ii) Second Compound Libraries

Secondary compound libraries are created by reactions between primary compounds in microcapsules. Secondary compounds can be created by a variety of two component, and multi-component reactions well known to those skilled in the art (Armstrong et al., 1996; Domling, 2002; Domling and Ugi, 2000; Ramstrom and Lehn, 2002).

To form secondary compound libraries by a two-component reaction, two sets of compounds are compartmentalised in microcapsules such that many compartments contain two or more compounds. Advantageously, the modal number of compounds per microcapsule is two. Advantageously, the microcapsules contain at least one type of compound from each set of compounds. Advantageously, the microcapsules contain one type of compound from each set of compounds. The secondary compounds are formed by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets. The secondary compound may be the result of a covalent or non-covalent reaction between the primary compounds.

A variety of chemistries, familiar to those skilled in the art, are suitable to form secondary compounds in two-component reactions. For example, reversible covalent bonds which can be controlled by changing the pH (e.g. imines and acylhydrazones), by adjusting the oxido-reductive properties (e.g. disulphides), or using an external catalyst (e.g. cross-metathesis and transamidation), can be used (Ramstrom and Lehn, 2002).

In a further embodiment, the method can also be used to create secondary compound libraries using three-component, four-component and higher order multi-component reactions. Three, four or more sets of compounds (as appropriate) are compartmentalised in microcapsules. The compounds are compartmentalised in microcapsules such that many compartments contain multiple compounds. Advantageously, the modal number of compounds per microcapsule is equal to the number of components in the reaction. Advantageously, the microcapsules contain at least one type of compound from each set of compounds. Advantageously, the microcapsules contain one type of compound from each set of compounds. The secondary compounds are formed by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets. The secondary compound may be the result of covalent or non-covalent reactions between the primary compounds.

Examples of suitable multi-component reactions are the Strecker, Hantzsch, Biginelli, Mannich, Passerini, Bucherer-Bergs and Pauson-Khand three-component reactions and the Ugi four-component reaction (Armstrong et al., 1996; Domling, 2002; Domling and Ugi, 2000).

Secondary compound libraries may also be built using a scaffold molecule which is common to all the secondary compounds (Ramstrom and Lehn, 2002). This scaffold molecule may be compartmentalised into microcapsules together with the other primary compounds.

In a further embodiment, to form secondary compound libraries by a two-component reaction, two sets of compounds are attached to microbeads, advantageously to give only a single type of molecule per microbead. The microbeads are compartmentalised in microcapsules such that many compartments contain two or more microbeads. Advantageously, the modal number of beads per microcapsule is two. The compounds comprising at least one of the two sets are released from the microbeads. The secondary compounds are formed by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets. The secondary compound may be the result of a covalent or non-covalent reaction between the primary compounds.

In a further embodiment, the method can also be used to create secondary compound libraries using three-component, four-component and higher order multi-component reactions. Three, four or more sets of compounds (as appropriate) are attached to microbeads, advantageously to give only a single type of molecule per microbead. The microbeads are compartmentalised in microcapsules such that many compartments contain multiple microbeads. Advantageously, the modal number of beads per microcapsule is equal to the number of components in the reaction. The compounds comprising either all, or all bar one, of the sets are released from the microbeads. The secondary compounds are formed by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets. The secondary compound may be the result of covalent or non-covalent reactions between the primary compounds.

Advantageously, the same reversible covalent bond can used to couple the primary compound to the microbead as is used to form the secondary compound.

(D) Identification Compounds

The compounds in microcapsules or on microbeads can be identified in a variety of ways. If the identified microcapsules are sorted (e.g. by using a fluorescence activated cell sorter—FACS) the compounds can be identified by direct analysis, for example by mass-spectroscopy. If the compounds remain attached to beads isolated as a result of selection (for example by affinity purification) or sorting (for example using a FACS) they can also be identified by direct analysis, for example by mass-spectroscopy. The microcapsules or beads can also be tagged by a variety of means well known to those skilled in the art and the tag used to identify the compound attached to the beads (Czarnik, 1997). Chemical, spectrometric, electronic, and physical methods to encode the compounds may all be used. In a preferred embodiment microcapsules or beads have different optical properties and are thereby optically encoded. In a preferred embodiment encoding is based on microcapsules or beads having different fluorescence properties. In a highly preferred embodiment the microcapsules or beads are encoded using fluorescent quantum dots present at different concentrations in the microcapsule or bead (Han, 2001). Microcapsules flowing in an ordered sequence in a microfluidic channel can also be encoded (wholly or partially) by their sequence in the stream of microcapsules (positional encoding).

Advantageously, each compounds is present in different microcapsules at different concentrations (typically at concentrations varying from mM to nM) allowing the generation of a dose-response curve. This would, for example, allow the determination of the inhibition constant (K_i) of an inhibitory compound. The concentration of the compounds in the microcapsules can be determined by, for example, optical encoding or positional encoding of the microcapsules or microbeads as above.

(E) Identification of Targets

Advantageously, multiple different targets can be compartmentalised in microcapsules such that each microcapsule contains multiple copies of the same target. For example, multiple protein kinases, or multiple polymorphic variants of a single target, can be compartmentalised to allow the specificity of compounds to be determined. The identity of the target in a microcapsule can be determined by, for example, optical encoding or positional encoding of the microcapsules or microbeads as above.

Expressed in an alternative manner, there is provided a method for the synthesis and identification of compounds which bind to a target component of a biochemical system or modulate the activity of the target, comprising the steps of:

- (a) compartmentalising two or more sets of primary compounds into microcapsules together with the target such that many compartments contain two or more primary compounds;
- (b) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
- (c) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

There is also provided a method for the synthesis and identification of compounds which bind to a target component of a biochemical system or modulate the activity of the target, comprising the steps of:

- (1) attaching two or more sets of primary compounds onto microbeads;
- (2) compartmentalising the microbeads into microcapsules together with the target such that many compartments contain two or more microbeads;
- (3) releasing the primary compounds from the microbeads;
- (4) forming secondary compounds in the microcapsules by chemical reactions between primary compounds from different sets; and
- (5) identifying subsets of primary compounds which react to form secondary compounds which bind to or modulate the activity of the target.

If the primary compounds react, not only with other primary compounds in the same compartment, but also with other microbeads in the compartment, the primary compounds which react together to form a secondary compound can be identified by direct analysis of the compounds present on a microbeads isolated as a result of selection or sorting. For example, if the primary compounds are linked to the beads via a disulphide bond when they are released in the compartment the primary compounds will react both with each other to form a secondary compound and with the sulphydryl groups on the beads. Hence, if two beads are co-compartmentalised, each bead will end up carrying both primary compounds. After isolation of these beads both primary compounds which reacted to form the secondary compound can be identified.

Various aspects and embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the following examples. It will be appreciated that modification of detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES
Example 1

Screening for Inhibitors of the Enzyme Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B (PTP1B)

A solution of 1% (w/v) Span 60 and 1% (w/v) cholesterol in decane (all from Sigma Aldrich) is prepared by dissolving 80 mg of Span 60 and 80 mg of cholesterol into 7.84 ml of decane. The decane is heated to 45° C. to allow complete solubilization of the surfactant and cholesterol. The surfactant/decane solution is divided over batches of 200 μl and placed in a block-heater at 37° C.

A hand-extruding device (Mini extruder, Avanti Polar Lipids Inc, Alabaster, Ala., USA) is assembled according to the manufacturer's instructions. For extrusion, a single 19 mm Track-Etch polycarbonate filter with average pore size of 14 μm (Whatman Nuclepore, Whatman, Maidstone, UK) is fitted inside the mini extruder. Two gas-tight 1 ml Hamilton syringes (Gastight #1001, Hamilton Co, Reno, Nev., USA) are used for extrusion. The extruder was pre-rinsed with 3×1 ml of decane by loading one of the Hamilton syringes with 1 ml of decane, placing the syringe at one and of the mini extruder and extruding it through the filters into the empty Hamilton syringe on the other side of the extruder.

The first emulsion is made by loading 50 μl of 100 μM compound 2 (FIG. 1), which has a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate and is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002), the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP 1 B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at 5 mU/ml, the fluorogenic PTP1B substrate 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) (Molecular Probes), and 100 μM Texas Red (Sigma; excitation/emmission maxima 595/615 nm; red fluorescence) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002) into one of the Hamilton syringes, and 200 μl of the pre-heated decane/surfactant mix into the other Hamilton syringe. The syringes are fitted into the openings on both sides of the filter holder of the extruder. The compound mix is forced through the filter holder into the alternate syringe containing the decane/surfactant mix and directly forced back into the original syringe to complete one round of extrusion. In total, 7.5 rounds of extrusion are completed. The filled syringe is removed from the extruder and emptied into a 1.7 ml Axygen tube (#MCT-175-C, Axygen Scientific, Inc., Union City, Calif., USA).

A second water-in-oil emulsion is made identical to the emulsion above but containing 100 μM hydrocinnamic acid (Aldrich), a compound that is not a PTP1B inhibitor, in place of compound 2, and 100 μM calcein (Sigma; excitation/emmission maxima 470/509 nm; green fluorescence) in place of Texas Red.

The two emulsions are mixed by vortexing in ratios varying from 1:1000 to 1:1 (compound 2 emulsion: hydrocinnamic acid emulsion) and incubated at 37° C. for 30 min. Inhibitors reduce the amount of non-fluorescent substrate (DiFMUP) converted to the dephosphorylated product (DiFMU; excitation/emmission maxima 358/452 nm; blue fluorescence).

The water-in-oil emulsions are then converted into water-in-oil-in water double emulsions as follows. The extruder (see above) is disassembled, cleaned extensively with soap and reversed-osmosis water, and re-assembled. A single 19 mm Track-Etch polycarbonate filter with an average pore size of 8 μm is fitted. The extruder is pre-rinsed with 3×1 ml phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS). 750 μl of PBS containing 0.5% (w/v) Tween 80 (Sigma Aldrich) is loaded into a 1 ml gas-tight Hamilton syringe and fitted into the extruder. 250 μl of the water-in-oil emulsion is loaded into the alternate 1 ml Hamilton syringe and fitted into the extruder. The emulsion is forced through the filter into the alternate syringe containing the PBS/0.5% Tween 80 and immediately forced back into the original syringe to complete one cycle of extrusion. In total, 4.5 cycles of extrusion are performed. The filled syringe is removed from the extruder and emptied into a 1.7 ml Axygen tube. The water-in-oil-in-water double emulsions formed are placed on ice.

The double emulsions are then analysed by multi-colour flow cytometery using a MoFlo (Cytomation) flow cytometer. Predominantly, microcapsules exhibiting green fluorescence (and containing hydrocinnamic acid) also show blue fluorescence due to dephosphorylation of DiFMUP by PTP1B. Predominantly, microcapsules exhibiting red fluorescence (and containing compound 2) also show little or no blue fluorescence due to inhibition of PTP1B.

Example 2

Two aqueous mixtures are made on ice (to prevent reaction). The first mixture contains 100 μM compound 2 (FIG. 1), which has a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate and is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002), the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at 5 mU/ml, the fluorogenic PTP1B substrate 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) (Molecular Probes), and 100 μM Texas Red (Sigma; excitation/emmission maxima 595/615 nm; red fluorescence) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002). A second mixture is created identical to the above but containing 100 μM hydrocinnamic acid (Aldrich), a compound that is not a PTP1B inhibitor, in place of compound 2, and 100 μM calcein (Sigma; excitation/emmission maxima 470/509 nm; green fluorescence) in place of Texas Red.

50 μl of each of the compound mixtures is added sequentially to a solution of 1% (w/v) Span 60 and 1% (w/v) cholesterol in decane, made and held at 37° C. as example 1, whilst homogenising at 25,000 r.p.m. using an Ultra-Turrax T8 Homogenizer (IKA) with a 5 mm dispersing tool. Homogenisation is continued for 3 minutes after the addition of the second aliquot. The coarse emulsion produced is then extruded as in example 1 to create a fine water-in-oil emulsion and incubated at 37° C. for 30 min. Inhibitors reduce the amount of non-fluorescent substrate (DiFMUP) converted to the dephosphorylated product (DiFMU; excitation/emmission maxima 358/452 nm; blue fluorescence). The water-in-oil emulsion is then converted into a water-in-oil-in water double emulsion and analysed by multi-colour flow cytometery as in example 1. Predominantly, microcapsules exhibiting green fluorescence (and containing hydrocinnamic acid) also show blue fluorescence due to dephosphorylation of DiFMUP by PTP1B. Predominantly, microcapsules exhibiting red fluorescence (and containing compound 2) also show little or no blue fluorescence due to inhibition of PTP1B.

Example 3

Screening of PTP1B Inhibitors from a Compound Library

100 water-in-oil emulsions are made on ice (to prevent reaction) as in example 1. The first emulsion is made by dispersing a mixture of 100 μM compound 2 (FIG. 1), which has a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate and is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002), the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at 5 mU/ml, the fluorogenic PTP1B substrate 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) (Molecular Probes), and a pre-defined ratio of Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates with emmission maxima at 585 nm, 655 nm and 705 nm (Quantum Dot Corporation, Hayward Calif.) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002). The 99 other water-in-oil emulsions are identical to the above but each contain one of 99 carboxylic acids from the Carboxylic Acid Organic Building Block Library (Aldrich) in place of compound 2, and different ratios of Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates with emmission maxima at 585 nm, 655 nm and 705 nm. In all emulsions the concentration of the 705 nm Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates is 100 nM, and the concentrations of the 585 nm and 655 nm Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates is either 0, 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88 or 100 nM. Hence, there are 100 (10×10) permutations of Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugate concentrations which allows the microcapsules containing each compound to have a unique fluorescence signature which is read by determining the fluorescence ratios of fluorescence at 705 nm, 585 nm and 655 nm.

The 100 emulsions are mixed in equal ratios by vortexing and the temperature raised to 25° C. for 30 min. Inhibitors reduce the amount of non-fluorescent substrate (DiFMUP) converted to the dephosphorylated product (DiFMU; excitation/emmission maxima 358/452 nm; blue fluorescence). The water-in-oil emulsion is then converted into a water-in-oil-in water double emulsion and analysed by multi-colour flow cytometery as in example ln. Predominantly, all microcapsules exhibited blue fluorescence due to dephosphorylation of DiFMUP by PTP1B except those with the Qdot fluorescence signature of the microcapsules containing compound 2.

Example 4

Screening of PTP1B Inhibitors from a Compound Library

100 aqueous mixtures are made on ice (to prevent reaction). The first mixture contains 100 μM compound 2 (FIG. 1), which has a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate and is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002), the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at 5 mU/ml, the fluorogenic PTP1B substrate 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) (Molecular Probes), and a pre-defined ratio of Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates with emmission maxima at 585 nm, 655 nm and 705 nm (Quantum Dot Corporation, Hayward Calif.) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002). The 99 other aqueous mixtures are identical to the above but each contain one of 99 carboxylic acids from the Carboxylic Acid Organic Building Block Library (Aldrich) in place of compound 2, and different ratios of Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates with emission maxima at 585 nm, 655 nm and 705 nm. In all mixtures the concentration of the 705 nm Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates is 100 nM, and the concentrations of the 585 nm and 655 nm Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugates is either 0, 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88 or 100 nM. Hence, there are 100 (10×10) permutations of Qdot™ Streptavidin Conjugate concentrations which allows the microcapsules containing each compound to have a unique fluorescence signature which is read by determining the fluorescence ratio of fluorescence at 705 nm, 585 nm and 655 nm.

0.5 μl of each of the compound mixtures is added sequentially to a solution of 1% (w/v) Span 60 and 1% (w/v) cholesterol in decane, made and held at 37° C. as example 1, whilst homogenising at 25,000 r.p.m. using an Ultra-Turrax T8 Homogenizer (IKA) with a 5 mm dispersing tool. Homogenisation is continued for 3 minutes after the addition of the second aliquot. The coarse emulsion produced is then extruded as in example 1 to create a fine water-in-oil emulsion and incubated at 37° C. for 30 min. Inhibitors reduce the amount of non-fluorescent substrate (DiFMUP) converted to the dephosphorylated product (DiFMU; excitation/emmission maxima 358/452 nm; blue fluorescence). The water-in-oil emulsion is then converted into a water-in-oil-in water double emulsion and analysed by multi-colour flow cytometery as in example 1. Predominantly, all microcapsules exhibited blue fluorescence due to dephosphorylation of DiFMUP by PTP1B except those with the Qdot fluorescence signature of the microcapsules containing compound 2.

Example 5

Screening for PTP1B Inhibitors Using Microcapsules in Microfluidic Systems

Microchannels are fabricated with rectangular cross-sections using rapid prototyping in poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) (McDonald and Whitesides, 2002) and rendered hydrophobic as (Song and Ismagilov, 2003). Syringe pumps were used to drive flows (Harvard Apparatus PHD 2000 Infusion pumps). For aqueous solutions, 50 μl Hamilton Gastight syringes (1700 series, TLL) with removeable needles of 27-gaugeare used with 30-gauge Teflon tubing (Weico Wire and Cable). For the carrier fluid, 1 ml Hamilton Gastight syringes (1700 series, TLL) are used with 30-gauge Teflon needles with one hub from Hamilton (Song and Ismagilov, 2003). The carrier fluid is 9% (v/v) C₆F₁₁C₂H₄OH in perfluorodecaline (PFD) (Song et al., 2003). All water-soluble reagents were dissolved in (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity.

A solution of the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at 50 mU/ml and a solution of either a) 100 μM compound 2 (FIG. 1), which has a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate and is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002), or b) 100 μM hydrocinnamic acid (Aldrich), a compound that is not a PTP inhibitor are flowed in a microchannel as two laminar streams, with an inert centre stream (of 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) to separate them and prevent the enzyme and compound coming into contact prior to droplet microcapsule formation (Song et al., 2003). These three steams are continuously injected into a flow of water immiscible fluorocarbon carrier fluid (9% (v/v) C₆F₁₁C₂H₄OH in PFD). Inlet channels for the aqeous solutions are 50 μm²wide and channel for PFD is 28 μm wide. A variety of PFD/water volumetric flow rates (in μl min⁻¹) can be used including 0.6:0.3, 1.0:0.6, 12.3:3.7, 10:6 and 20:6, resulting in flow rates of 10, 19, 190, 190 and 300 mm s⁻¹respectively. Aqueous microcapsules which occupy the entire width of the channel are formed by drop-breakoff in the PFD stream (Song et al., 2003). Microcapsules containing either compound 2 or hydrocinnamic acid can be formed by switching between injection with syringes containing compound 2 and hydrocinnamic acid.

The channel immediately downstream of the point of droplet formation is winding with a peak to peak distance of 50 μm for a distance of 1 mm. This results in rapid mixing of the contents of the microcapsule by chaotic advection (Song et al., 2003). After this point the microcapsules are run for up to 1 min through a 60 cm long microchannel (to allow inhibitor binding). This microchannel is then merged with a 60×50 μm²microchannel containing aqueous microcapsules in (9% (v/v) C₆F₁₁C₂H₄OH in PFD) formed as above. These larger microcapsules contain the fluorogenic PTP1B substrate 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) (Molecular Probes) in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA. After the junction between the microchannels the expanded main channel is 100×50 μm²and the microcapsules do not block the channel and can move at different speeds until a large microcapsule (containing DiFMUP) coalesces with a small microcapsule (containing PTP1B and the compound) (Song et al., 2003). The frequency of production of large and small microcapsules is equal such that each large microcapsule has a small microcapsule with which to fuse. The fused microcapsules are then run for up to 2 min through a 60 cm long microchannel. Fluorescence of the microcapsules due to production of DiFMU (excitation/emmission maxima 350/452 nm; blue fluorescence) is measured using an epifluorescence microscope. Predominantly, microcapsules exhibiting blue fluorescence are those containing hydrocinnamic acid whereas microcapsules containing compound 2 exhibit low fluorescence due to inhibition of PTP1B.

Example 6

Attachment of a Compound Library to Microbeads

5.5 μM diameter polystyrene microbeads that bear carboxylate functional groups on the surface are commercially available (www.luminexcorp.com) in an optically tagged form, as a result of incorporation of precise ratios of orange (585 nm), and red (>650 nm) fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997). A set of 100 such beads, each with a unique optical signature (www.luminexcorp.com) are modified with an excess of ethylenediamine and EDC (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (Pierce) as (Hermanson, 1996) to create primary amino groups on the surface. The photocleavable linker 4-(4-hydroxymethyl-2-methoxy-5-nitrophenoxy)butanoic acid (NovaBiochem) (Holmes and Jones, 1995) is then attached to the beads by forming an amide bond using EDC as above. 100 different carboxylic acids from the Carboxylic Acid Organic Building Block Library (Aldrich) are then coupled to the beads, by reacting with the linker alcohol to form a carboxylate ester, each of the 100 different optically tagged beads being coupled to a different carboxylic acid, and each bead being derivatised with ˜10⁶molecules of carboxylic acid. Irradiation for 4 min on ice using a B100 AP 354 nm UV lamp (UVP) from a distance of ˜5 cm results in release of the compounds from the beads as carboxylic acids.

Example 7

Screening for Inhibitors of the Enzyme Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) Using Compounds Attached to Microbeads

PTP1B is a negative regulator of insulin and leptin signal transduction. Resistance to insulin and leptin are hallmarks of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity and hence PTP1B is an attractive drug target for diabetes and obesity therapy (Johnson et al., 2002). 5.5 μm diameter polystyrene microbeads that bear carboxylate functional groups on the surface are commercially available (www.luminexcorp.com) in an optically tagged form, as a result of incorporation of precise ratios of orange (585 nm), and red (>650 nm) fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997). First, the carboxylate functional groups on the microbeads are converted to primary amines using ethylenediamine and EDC as in example 6. A phosphopeptide substrate for PTP1B, the undecapaptide EGFR_988-998(DADEpYLIPQQG) (Zhang et al., 1993), is then coupled to both sets of microbeads via the surface amino groups using EDC. This peptide is made by solid phase synthesis on Sieber Amide resin (9-Fmoc-amino-xanthen-3-yloxy-Merrifield resin) (Novabiochem) with orthogonal protection on the side chain carboxylate groups using carboxylate-O-allyl esters. A linker comprised of tetradecanedioic acid is coupled to the N-terminus and the peptide cleaved from the beads using 1% TFA to yield a peptide with a C-terminal amide The peptide is coupled to the beads (using EDC) via the linker to give ˜10⁵peptides per bead. The remaining surface amino groups are then modified by attaching the photochemically cleavable linker 4-(4-hydroxymethyl-2-methoxy-5-nitrophenoxy)butanoic acid as in example 6. The protecting groups on the side chain carboxylates of the peptide are then removed using Pd(Ph₃)₄/CHCl₃/HOAc/N-methyl morpholine. A first set of microbeads is derivatised with 3-(4-difluorophosphonomethylphenyl)propanoic acid (compound 1, FIG. 1), a compound that is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002). A second set of beads, with a distinct optical tag from the first set of beads, is derivatised with hydrocinnamic acid (Aldrich), a compound that is not a PTP1B inhibitor. In each case the compound is coupled by reacting with the linker alcohol to form a carboxylate ester as in example 6. Each microbead is derivatised with ˜10⁶molecules (Fulton et al., 1997).

The microbeads are then screened using the method outlined in FIG. 2. The two sets of microbeads are mixed in ratios varying from 1:1000 to 1:1 (compound 1 beads: hydrocinnamic acid beads) and 10⁸total microbeads are mixed with the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at a concentration of 10 nM, on ice (to prevent reaction) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002). Single beads and target enzyme (PTP1B) are then colocalised in microcapsules by forming a water-in-oil emulsion (also on ice). The concentration of beads is such that most microcapsules contain one or no beads. The compound is released photochemically (as in example 6) and the temperature raised to 25° C. Inhibitors reduce the amount of substrate converted to product (dephosphorylated peptide). The emulsion is cooled to 4° C. and broken as (Griffiths and Tawfik, 2003) into 100 μl vanadate to stop the reaction (Harder et al., 1994). After labelling with an anti-substrate (anti-phosphotyrosine) antibody labelled with the green (530 nm) fluorochrome fluorescein isothiocyanate (mouse monoclonal IgG_2bPY20 (Santa Cruz) according to the manufacturer's instructions, beads are analysed by 3-colour flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton-Dickinson), FACScalibur (Becton-Dickinson) or MoFlo (Cytomation) flow cytometers to simultaneously determine the extent of inhibition and the compound on the beads. Predominantly, dephosphorylation of the peptide is only observed on those microbeads which were coated with PTP1B inhibitors, and not on other microbeads.

Example 8

Screening of PTP1B Inhibitors from a Compound Library Attached to Microbeads

A set of 100 5.5 μM diameter polystyrene microbeads, bearing carboxylate functional groups on the surface and each with a unique optical signature (www.luminexcorp.com) as a result of incorporation of precise ratios of orange (585 nm), and red (>650 nm) fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997) are derivatised with a phosphopeptide substrate for PTP1B, the undecapaptide EGFR_988-998(DADEpYLIPQQG) (Zhang et al., 1993), and 100 different carboxylic acids, each attached via a photochemically cleavable linker, as in example 7. One of these carboxylic acids is 3-(4-difluorophosphonomethylphenyl)propanoic acid (compound 1, FIG. 1), a compound that is a known PTP1B inhibitor (Johnson et al., 2002). The other 99 carboxylic acids are from the Carboxylic Acid Organic Building Block Library (Aldrich) as example 6. Equal numbers of each of the 100 bead sets are then mixed and screened as for example 7. Predominantly, dephosphorylation of the peptide is only observed on those microbeads which were coated with the PTP1B inhibitor 3-(4-difluorophosphonomethylphenyl)propanoic acid (compound 1, FIG. 1), and not on microbeads coated with other compounds.

Example 9

Synthesis of Secondary Compounds in Emulsion Microcapsules and Screening for PTP1B Inhibition in Microfluidic System

A solution of the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at 50 mU/ml, a solution of a compound which is a primary amine, and a solution of a compound which is an aldehyde are flowed in a microchannel as three laminar streams, with two inert separating streams (of 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) to prevent the enzyme and the compounds coming into contact prior to droplet microcapsule formation (Song et al., 2003). These five streams are continuously injected into a flow of water immiscible fluorocarbon carrier fluid (9% (v/v) C₆F₁₁C₂H₄OH in PFD). The amines and aldehydes can either a) contain a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (FIG. 6, compounds A and B), or b) contain no difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety.

Inlet channels for the aqeous solutions are 50 μm²wide and the channel for PFD is 28 μm wide. A variety of PFD/water volumetric flow rates (in μl min⁻¹) can be used including 0.6:0.3, 1.0:0.6, 12.3:3.7, 10:6 and 20:6, resulting in flow rates of 10, 19, 190, 190 and 300 mm s⁻¹respectively. Aqueous microcapsules which occupy the entire width of the channel are formed by drop-breakoff in the PFD stream (Song et al., 2003). Microcapsules containing compounds with and without difluoromethylene phosphonate moieties can be formed by switching between injection with syringes containing amines or aldehydes with or without a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety.

The channel immediately downstream of the point of droplet formation is winding with a peak to peak distance of 50 μm for a distance of 1 mm. This results in rapid mixing of the contents of the microcapsule by chaotic advection (Song et al., 2003). After this point the microcapsules are run for up to 1 min through a 60 cm long microchannel. This allows the amine and the aldehyde to react together by formation of a Schiff base to create a secondary compound and allows inhibitors to bind to PTP1B. This microchannel is then merged with a 60×50 μm²microchannel containing aqueous microcapsules in (9% (v/v) C₆F₁₁C₂H₄OH in PFD) formed as above. These larger microcapsules contain the fluorogenic PTP1B substrate 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (DiFMUP) (Molecular Probes) in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA. After the junction between the microchannels the expanded main channel is 100×50 μm²and the microcapsules do not block the channel and can move at different speeds until a large microcapsule (containing DiFMUP) coalesces with a small microcapsule (containing PTP1B and the compound) (Song et al., 2003). The frequency of production of large and small microcapsules is equal such that each large microcapsule has a small microcapsule with which to fuse. The fused microcapsules are then run for up to 2 min through a 60 cm long microchannel. Fluorescence of the microcapsules due to production of DiFMU (excitation/emmission maxima 358/452 nm; blue fluorescence) is measured using an epifluorescence microscope.

Predominantly, when the amine and aldehyde concentrations are low (<100 μM) inhibition of PTP1B activity is only observed in microcapsules containing both an amine with a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (compound A, FIG. 6) and an aldehyde with a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (compound B, FIG. 6). This is because the Schiff base formed in these microcapsules (compound C, FIG. 6) contains bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate and is a much more potent PTP1B inhibitor than a molecule with a single difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (see FIG. 1).

Predominantly, when the amine and aldehyde concentrations are high (>100 μM) inhibition of PTP1B activity is observed in microcapsules containing either an amine with a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (compound A, FIG. 6) or an aldehyde with a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (compound B, FIG. 6), or both, but not in other microcapsules. This is because at higher concentrations molecules with either a single difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety or a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate (compound C, FIG. 6) can inhibit PTP (see FIG. 1).

Example 10

Synthesis of Secondary Compounds in Emulsion Microcapsules and Screening for PTP1B Inhibition Using Compounds Attached to Microbeads

5.5 μm diameter polystyrene microbeads that bear carboxylate functional groups on the surface are commercially available (www.luminexcorp.com) in an optically tagged form, as a result of incorporation of precise ratios of orange (585 nm), and red (>650 nm) fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997). First, the carboxylate functional groups on the microbeads are converted to primary amines using ethylenediamine and EDC as in example 6. A phosphopeptide substrate for PTP1B, the undecapaptide EGFR_988-998(DADEpYLIPQQG) (Zhang et al., 1993), is then coupled to both sets of microbeads via the surface amino groups using EDC and the protecting groups on the side chain carboxylates of the peptide removed as in example 7. A first set of microbeads (set 1) is reacted with succinimidyl p-formylbenzoate to convert the surface amino groups to aldehydes. A second set of microbeads (set 2), with a distinct optical tag from the first set of microbeads, is left unreacted (i.e. with primary amines on the surface).

The first set of microbeads (set 1), are then reacted with a compound containing a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety and a primary amine (compound A, FIG. 6) via reaction with the surface aldehyde groups to form a Schiff base. The second set of microbeads (set 2), with a distinct optical tag from the first set of beads, are reacted with a compound containing a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety and an aldehyde (compound B, FIG. 6) via reaction of the aldehyde with the surface amine groups to form a Schiff base. The formation of Schiff bases is enhanced by reaction at alkaline pH (i.e. pH9-10). Microbeads coated with compounds at various densities are created.

The two sets of microbeads are mixed with the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at a concentration of 10 nM, on ice (to prevent reaction) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002). The beads and target enzyme (PTP1B) are immediately compartmentalised in microcapsules by forming a water-in-oil emulsion (also on ice).

The number of microbeads is varied such that, at one extreme, most microcapsules contain one or no beads, and at the other, the majority of microcapsules contain two or more microbeads. The temperature raised to 25° C. The Schiff base is a relatively labile, reversible interaction, readily hydrolysed at neutral pH, resulting in release of compounds from the beads. In microcapsules containing a microbead from both set 1 and set 2, the compounds released from the microbeads can react with each other, forming a Schiff base and creating a new molecule in solution. This new molecule (FIG. 6, compound C) contains a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety and has significantly more potency as a PTP1B inhibitor than compounds with a single difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety (see FIG. 1). Inhibitors reduce the amount of substrate converted to product (dephosphorylated peptide). The emulsion is cooled to 4° C. and broken as (Griffiths and Tawfik, 2003) into 100 μM vanadate to stop the reaction (Harder et al., 1994). After labelling with an anti-substrate (anti-phosphotyrosine) antibody labelled with the green (530 nm) fluorochrome fluorescein isothiocyanate (mouse monoclonal IgG₂, PY20 (Santa Cruz) according to the manufacturer's instructions, beads are analysed by 3-colour flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton-Dickinson), FACScalibur (Becton-Dickinson) or MoFlo (Cytomation) flow cytometers to simultaneously determine the extent of inhibition and the compound on the beads. With low microbead numbers, most microcapsules contain only a single or no microbeads and PTP1B inhibition is only detected on beads coated with a high density of inhibitor, when the concentration of inhibitor released into solution in each microcapsule is sufficiently high for effective inhibition. In contrast, when the bead numbers are higher, many microbeads are detected where little substrate has been converted to product, even when the microbeads are coated with inhibitor at low density. This is due to the formation of a highly potent PTP1B inhibitor (FIG. 6, compound C) containing a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety in microcapsules containing a microbead each from set 1 and set 2.

Example 11

Synthesis of a Library 2500 Secondary Compounds in Emulsion Microcapsules and Screening for PTP1B Inhibition Using Compounds Attached to Microbeads

A set of 100 5.5 μm diameter polystyrene microbeads, bearing carboxylate functional groups on the surface and each with a unique optical signature (www.luminexcorp.com) as a result of incorporation of precise ratios of orange (585 nm), and red (>650 nm) fluorochromes (Fulton et al., 1997) are modified to convert the carboxylate functional groups to primary amines as in example 6, then derivatised with a phosphopeptide substrate for PTP1B, the undecapaptide EGFR_988-998(DADEpYLIPQQG) (Zhang et al., 1993), as in example 10. The first 50 sets of microbeads are reacted to convert a proportion of the surface carboxyl groups to aldehydes as in example 10. The second 50 sets of microbeads are left unreacted (i.e. with primary amines on the surface).

The first 50 sets of microbeads are each reacted with a unique compound containing a primary amine via reaction with the surface aldehyde groups to form a Schiff base which links the compounds to the beads. One of these compounds (compound A, FIG. 6) contains a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety. The second 50 sets of microbeads are each reacted with a unique compound containing an aldehyde via reaction with the surface amine groups to form a Schiff base which links the compounds to the beads. One of these compounds (compound B, FIG. 6) contains a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety. The formation of Schiff bases is enhanced by reaction at alkaline pH (i.e. pH9-10).

The two sets of microbeads are mixed with the target enzyme (human recombinant PTP1B, residues 1-322; Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc.) at a concentration of 10 nM, on ice (to prevent reaction) in a buffer compatible with PTP1B activity (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA) (Doman et al., 2002). The beads and target enzyme (PTP 1 B) are immediately compartmentalised in microcapsules by forming a water-in-oil emulsion (also on ice).

The number of microbeads is such that the modal number of microcapsules per microcapsule is two. The temperature raised to 25° C. The Schiff base is a relatively labile, reversible interaction, readily hydrolysed at neutral pH, resulting in release of compounds from the beads. In microcapsules containing a microbead from one of the first 50 sets and a microbead from one of the second 50 sets, the compounds released from the microbeads can react with each other, forming a Schiff base and creating a new molecule in solution. Inhibitors reduce the amount of substrate converted to product (dephosphorylated peptide). The emulsion is cooled to 4° C. and broken as (Griffiths and Tawfik, 2003) into 100 μM vanadate to stop the reaction (Harder et al., 1994). After labelling with an anti-substrate (anti-phosphotyrosine) antibody labelled with the green (530 nm) fluorochrome fluorescein isothiocyanate (mouse monoclonal IgG_2bPY20 (Santa Cruz) according to the manufacturer's instructions, beads are analysed by 3-colour flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton-Dickinson), FACScalibur (Becton-Dickinson) or MoFlo (Cytomation) flow cytometers to simultaneously determine the extent of inhibition and the compound on the beads. Beads which were coated with a primary compound which is itself a PTP1B inhibitor, or which reacts with another primary compound released from another co-compartmentalised bead to form a second inhibitor are identified as little substrate has been converted to product. The identified beads where as little substrate has been converted to product include those carrying compounds containing a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety. When the microbeads are coated with compounds at low density the concentration of the released compounds containing a difluoromethylene phosphonate moieties in the microcapsules is insufficient to efficiently inhibit PTP1B (see example 7). However in microcapsules containing two microbeads, one from the first set of 50 beads and one from the second set of 50 beads, and where each microbead carries a molecule with a difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety, the released molecules can form a highly potent PTP inhibitor (compound C, FIG. 6) containing a bis-difluoromethylene phosphonate moiety in the microcapsules which inhibits conversion of the PTP1B substrate to product.

Example 12

Compartmentalisation of Small Molecules in a Water-in-fluorocarbon Emulsions.

Water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions containing 95% (v/v) perfluorooctyl bromide, 5% (v/v) phosphate buffered saline containing the molecule of interest in solution, and 2% (w/v) C₈F₁₇C₁₁H₂₂OP(O)[N(CH₂CH₂)₂O]₂(F8H11DMP) as surfactant were formed essentially as (Sadtler et al., 1996) by extrusion (15 times) through 14 μm filters (Osmonics) or by homogenising for 5 mm at 25,000 r.p.m. using an Ultra-Turrax T8 Homogenizer (IKA) with a 5 mm dispersing tool. Emulsions were made containing a series of small fluorescent molecules dissolved in the aqueous phase at concentrations from 100 μm to 2 mM. These molecules, including calcein, texas red, fluorescein, coumarin 102, 7-hydroxycoumarin-3-carboxylic acid and 7-diethylamino-4-methyl coumarin (coumarin 1), had molecular weights from 203 to 625 Da and LogP values—calculated using SRC's LogKow/KowWin Program (Meylan and Howard, 1995)—ranging from −0.49 to 4.09. Emulsions containing different coloured fluorochromes were mixed by vortexing. Compartmentalisation was observed by epifluorescence microscopy of the mixed emulsions. No exchange between compartments was observed 24 hours after mixing (see FIG. 5).

REFERENCES

Adang, A. E., and Hermkens, P. H. (2001). The contribution of combinatorial chemistry to lead generation: an interim analysis. Curr Med Chem 8, 985-998.

Anderson, J. E. (1993). Restriction endonucleases and modification methylases. Curr Op Struct Biol 3, 24-30.

Becher, P. (1957) Emulsions: theory and practice. Reinhold, N.Y.

Benita, S. (ed.). (1996) Microencapsulation: methods and industrial applications. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Bernath, K., Hai, M., Mastrobattista, E., Griffiths, A. D., Magdassi, S. and Tawfik, D. S. (2004) In vitro compartmentalization by double emulsions: sorting and gene enrichment by fluorescence activated cell sorting. Anal Biochem, 325, 151-157.

Bru, R. and Walde, P. (1991) Product inhibition of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles. Eur J Biochem, 199, 95-103.

Bru, R. and Walde, P. (1993) Catalytic activity of elastase in reverse micelles. Biochem Mol Biol Int, 31, 685-692.

Burbaum, J. (1998). Miniaturization technologies in HTS: how fast, how small, how soon? Drug Discov Today 3, 313-322.

Calvert, P. (2001) Inkjet printing for materials and devices. Chem. Mater., 13, 3299-3305.

Chakrabarti, A. C., Breaker, R. R., Joyce, G. F. and Deamer, D. W. (1994) Production of RNA by a polymerase protein encapsulated within phospholipid vesicles. J Mol Evol, 39, 555-559.

Chang, T. M. (1987) Recycling of NAD(P) by multienzyme systems immobilized by microencapsulation in artificial cells. Methods Enzymol, 136, 67-82.

Chang, T. M. S. (1992) Recent advances in artificial cells based on microencapsulation. In Donbrow, M. (ed.), Microcapsules and nanoparticles in medicine and pharmacy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp. 323-339.

Creagh, A. L., Prausnitz, J. M. and Blanch, H. W. (1993) Structural and catalytic properties of enzymes in reverse micelles. Enzyme Microb Technol, 15, 383-392.

Curran, D. P. (1998) Strategy-level separations in organic synthesis: from planning to practice. Angew Chem Int Ed, 37, 1174-1196.

Czarnik, A. W. (1997). Encoding methods for combinatorial chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1, 60-66.

Davis, S. S., and Walker, I. M. (1987). Multiple emulsions as targetable delivery systems. Methods in Enzymology 149, 51-64.

de Gans, B.-J., Duineveld, P. C. and Schubert, U.S. (2004) Inkjet printing of polymers: state of the art and future developments. Advanced materials, 16, 203-213.

Dickinson, E. (1994) Emulsions and droplet size control. In Wedlock, D. J. (ed.), Controlled particle, droplet and bubble formation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 191-257.

Doi, N., and Yanagawa, H. (1999). STABLE: protein-DNA fusion system for screening of combinatorial protein libraries in vitro. FEBS Lett 457, 227-230.

Doman, T. N., McGovern, S. L., Witherbee, B. J., Kasten, T. P., Kurumbail, R., Stallings, W. C., Connolly, D. T. and Shoichet, B. K. (2002) Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J Med Chem, 45, 2213-2221.

Finch, C. A. (1993) Encapsulation and controlled release. Spec. Publ.-R. Soc. Chem., 138, 35.

Fornusek & Vetvicka, Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1986; 2(2):137-74

Fu, A.Y., Chou, H. P., Spence, C., Arnold, F. H. and Quake, S. R. (2002) An integrated microfabricated cell sorter. Anal Chem, 74, 2451-2457.

Fulton, R. J., McDade, R. L., Smith, P. L., Kienker, L. J. and Kettman, J. R., Jr. (1997)

Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system. Clin Chem, 43, 1749-1756.

Ghadessy, F. J., Ong, J. L. and Holliger, P. (2001) Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98, 4552-4557.

Gordon, K., and Balasubramanian, S. (1999). Solid phase chemistry—designer linkers for combinatorial chemistry. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74, 835-851.

Griffiths, A. D., Williams, S. C., Hartley, O., Tomlinson, I. M., Waterhouse, P., Crosby, W. L., Kontermann, R. E., Jones, P. T., Low, N. M., Allison, T. J., and et al. (1994). Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires. Embo J 13, 3245-3260.

Griffiths, A. D. and Tawfik, D. S. (2003) Directed evolution of an extremely fast phosphotriesterase by in vitro compartmentalization. Embo J, 22, 24-35.

Guixe et al., Ligand-induced conformational transitions in Escherichia coli phosphofructokinase 2: evidence for an allosteric site for MgATP2-. Biochemistry. 1998 Sep. 22; 37(38):13269-75.

Haber, J., Maslakiewicz, P., Rodakiewicz, N. J. and Walde, P. (1993) Activity and spectroscopic properties of bovine liver catalase in sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate/isooctane reverse micelles. Eur J Biochem, 217, 567-573.

Han, M., Gao, X., Su, J. Z., and Nie, S. (2001). Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules. Nat Biotechnol 19, 631-635.

Han, M., Gao, X., Su, J. Z. and Nie, S. (2001) Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules. Nat Biotechnol, 19, 631-635.

Handen, J. S. (Summer 2002). High-throughput screening—challenges for the future. Drug Discov World, 47-50.

Harder, K. W., Owen, P., Wong, L. K., Aebersold, R., Clark-Lewis, I., and Jirik, F. R. (1994). Characterization and kinetic analysis of the intracellular domain of human protein tyrosine phosphatase beta (HPTP beta) using synthetic phosphopeptides. Biochem J 298 (Pt 2), 395-401.

Heim R, Tsien R Y. Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Curr Biol. 1996 Feb. 1; 6(2):178-82.

Hergenrother, P. J Depew, K. P., and Schreiber, S. L. (2000). Small-molecule microarrays: covalent attachment and screening of alcohol-containing small molecules on glass slides. J Am Chem Soc 122, 7849-7850.

Hermanson, G. T. (1996) Bioconjugate techniques. Academic Press, San Diego.

Hildebrand, J. H. and Cochran, D. F. R. (1949) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 22.

Hochuli, E., Dobeli, H., and Schacher, A. (1987). New metal chelate adsorbent selective for proteins and peptides containing neighbouring histidine residues. J Chromatogr 411, 177-184.

Holmes, C. P., and Jones, D. G. (1995). Reagents for combinatorial organic synthesis: development of a new o-nitrobenzyl photolabile linker for solid phase synthesis. J Org Chem 60, 2318-2319.

Hudlicky, M. (1992) Chemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds. Ellis Horwood, New York.

Johannsson, A. (1991). Heterogeneous enzyme immunoassays. In Principles and practice of immunoassays, C. P. Price, and D. J. Newman, eds. (New York, Stockton Press), pp. 295-325.

Johannsson, A., and Bates, D. L. (1988). Amplification by second enzymes. In ELISA and other solid phase immunoassays, D. M. Kemeny, and S. J. Challacombe, eds. (Chichester, John Wiley), pp. 85-106.

Johnson, T. O., Ermolieff, J., and Jirousek, M. R. (2002). Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors for diabetes. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1, 696 -709.

Keij et al., Cytometry. 1995 Mar. 1; 19(3):209-16

Kerker, Cytometry. 1983 July; 4(1):1-10

Klug, A. (1995). Gene regulatory proteins and their interaction with DNA. Ann NY Acad Sci 758, 143-160.

Klug, A., and Schwabe, J. W. (1995). Protein motifs 5. Zinc fingers. Faseb J 9, 597-604.

Krafft, M. P., Chittofrati, A. and Riess, J. G. (2003) Emulsions and microemulsions with a fluorocarbon phase. Curr. Op. Colloid Interface Sci., 8, 251-258.

Kumar, A., Kumar, A. and Katiyar, S. S. (1989) Activity and kinetic characteristics of glutathione reductase in vitro in reverse micellar waterpool. Biochim Biophys Acta, 996, 1-6.

Lee, Y.-F., Tawfik, D. S., and Griffiths, A. D. (2002). Investigating the target recognition of DNA cytosine-5 methyltransferase HhaI by library selection using in vitro compartmentalisation (IVC). Nucleic Acids Res 30, 4937-4944.

Lim, F. (ed.). (1984) Biomedical applications of microencapsulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.

Lim, F. and Sun, A. M. (1980) Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science, 210, 908-910.

Link, D. R., Anna, S. L., Weitz, D. A. and Stone, H. A. (2004) Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. Phys. Rev. Letts., 92, 054503.

Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W. and Feeney, P. J. (2001) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 46, 3-26.

Lissant, K. J. (ed.). (1974) Emulsions and emulsion technology. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Lissant, K. J. (ed.). (1984) Emulsions and emulsion technology. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Lowe, K. C. (2002) Perfluorochemical respiratory gas carriers: benefits to cell culture systems. J. Fluorine Chem., 118, 19-26.

Luisi, P. L. and B., S.-H. (1987) Activity and conformation of enzymes in reverse micellar solutions. Methods Enzymol, 136, 188-216.

Lyne, P. D. (2002). Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discov Today 7, 1047-1055.

Mackenzie and Pinder, Dev Biol Stand. 1986; 64:181-93.

Mahajan N P, Linder K, Berry G, Gordon G W, Heim R, Herman B. Bcl-2 and Bax interactions in mitochondria probed with green fluorescent protein and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nat Biotechnol. 1998 June; 16(6):547-52.

Mao, Q. and Walde, P. (1991) Substrate effects on the enzymatic activity of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 178, 1105-1112.

Mao, Q., Walde, P. and Luisi, P. L. (1992) Kinetic behaviour of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles. A stopped-flow study. Eur J Biochem, 208, 165-170.

Masui and Kuramitsu, Probing of DNA-binding sites of Escherichia coli RecA protein utilizing 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid. Biochemistry. 1998 Sep. 1; 37 (35): 12133-43

McDonald, J. C. and Whitesides, G. M. (2002) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc Chem Res, 35, 491-499.

Menger, F. M. and Yamada, K. (1979) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 6731-6734.

Meylan, W. M. and Howard, P. H. (1995) Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients. J Pharm Sci, 84, 83-92.

Miyawaki A, Llopis J, Heim R, McCaffery J M, Adams J A, Ikura M, Tsien R Y. Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin. Nature. 1997 Aug. 28; 388(6645): 882-7.

Mize, P. D., Hoke, R. A., Linn, C. P., Reardon, J. E., and Schulte, T. H. (1989). Dual-enzyme cascade—an amplified method for the detection of alkaline phosphatase. Anal Biochem 179, 229-235.

Montigiani, S., Neri, G., Neri, P., and Neri, D. (1996). Alanine substitutions in calmodulin-binding peptides result in unexpected affinity enhancement. J Mol Biol 258, 6-13.

New, R. R. C. (ed.). (1990) Liposomes: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Norman, Med Phys. 1980 November-December; 7(6):609-15.

Oberholzer, T., Albrizio, M. and Luisi, P. L. (1995) Polymerase chain reaction in liposomes. Chem Biol, 2, 677-682.

Oberholzer, T., Wick, R., Luisi, P. L. and Biebricher, C. K. (1995) Enzymatic RNA replication in self-reproducing vesicles: an approach to a minimal cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 207, 250-257.

Obukowicz, M. G., Turner, M. A., Wong, E. Y. and Tacon, W. C. (1988) Secretion and export of IGF-1 in Escherichia coli strain JM101. Mol Gen Genet, 215, 19-25.

Perelson, A. S., and Oster, G. F. (1979). Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination. J Theor Biol 81, 645-670.

Perez, G. M., Sanchez, F. A. and Garcia, C. F. (1992) Application of active-phase plot to the kinetic analysis of lipoxygenase in reverse micelles. Biochem J.

Pirrung, M. C., and Huang, C. Y. (1996). A general method for the spatially defined immobilization of biomolecules on glass surfaces using “caged” biotin. Bioconjug Chem 7, 317-321.

Qi and Grabowski, Acid beta-glucosidase: intrinsic fluorescence and conformational changes induced by phospholipids and saposin C. Biochemistry. 1998 Aug. 18; 37(33):11544-54

Ramstrom, O., and Lehn, J. M. (2002). Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1, 26-36.

Riess, J. G. (2002) Fluorous micro- and nanophases with a biomedical perspective. Tetrahedron, 58, 4113-4131.

Rolland, J Immunol Methods. 1985 Jan. 21; 76(1):1-10

Sadtler, V. M., Krafft, M. P. and Riess, J. G. (1996) Achieving stable, reverse water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 35, 1976-1978.

Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W., eds. (2001). Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Savage, M. D., Mattson, G., Desai, S., Nielander, G. W., Morgensen, S., and Conklin, E. J. (1994). Avidin-biotin chemistry: a handbook, 2 edn (Rockford, Pierce Chemical Company).

Schick, M. J. (1966) Nonionic surfactants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Scott, R. L. (1948) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70, 4090.

Sepp, A., Tawfik, D. S., and Griffiths, A. D. (2002). Microbead display by in vitro compartmentalisation: selection for binding using flow cytometry. FEBS Letters 532, 455-458.

Shapiro, H. M. (1995). Practical Flow Cytometry, 3 edn (New York, Wiley-Liss).

Sherman, P. (1968) Emulsion science. Academic Press, London.

Song, H. and Ismagilov, R. F. (2003) Millisecond kinetics on a microfluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents. J Am Chem Soc, 125, 14613-14619.

Song, H., Tice, J. D. and Ismagilov, R. F. (2003) A microfluidic system for controlling reaction networks in time. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 42, 767-772.

Stofko, H. R., Carr, D. W., and Scott, J. D. (1992). A single step purification for recombinant proteins. Characterization of a microtubule associated protein (MAP 2) fragment which associates with the type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Febs Lett 302, 274-278.

Studer, A., Hadida, S., Ferritto, R., Kim, S. Y., Jeger, P., Wipf, P. and Curran, D.P. (1997) Fluorous synthesis: a fluorous-phase strategy for improving separation efficiency in organic synthesis. Science, 275, 823-826.

Sun, A. M., Vasek, I. and Tai, I. (1992) Microencapsulation of living cells and tissues. In Donbrow, M. (ed.), Microencapsulation and nanoparticles in medicine and pharmacy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp. 315-322.

Sundberg, S. A., Barrett, R. W., Pirrung, M., Lu, A. L., Kiangsoontra, B., and Holmes, C. P. (1995). Spatially-addressable immobilisation of macromolecules on solid supports. J Am Chem Soc 117, 12050-12057.

Tawfik, D. S., and Griffiths, A. D. (1998). Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nat Biotechnol 16, 652-656.

Thorsen, T., R. W., R., Arnold, F. H. and Quake, S. R. (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys. Rev. Letts., 86, 4163-4166.

Tripet, B., Yu, L., Bautista, D. L., Wong, W. Y., Irvin, R. T., and Hodges, R. S. (1996). Engineering a de novo-designed coiled-coil heterodimerization domain off the rapid detection, purification and characterization of recombinantly expressed peptides and proteins. Protein Eng 9, 1029-1042.

Umbanhowar, P. B., Prasad, V. and Weitz, D. A. (2000) Monodisperse emulsions generated via drop break off in a coflowing steam. Langmuir, 16, 347-351.

van Hal, D. A., Bouwstra, J. A. and Junginger, H. E. (1996) Nonionic surfactant vesicles containing estradiol for topical application. In Benita, S. (ed.), Microencapsulation: methods and industrial applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 329-347.

Voss E W Jr. Kinetic measurements of molecular interactions by spectrofluorometry. J Mol Recognit. 1993 June; 6(2):51-8

Walde, P., Goto, A., Monnard, P.-A., Wessicken, M. and Luisi, P. L. (1994) Oparin's reactions revisited: enzymatic synthesis of poly(adenylic acid) in micelles and self-reproducing vesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 7541-7547.

Walde, P., Han, D. and Luisi, P. L. (1993) Spectroscopic and kinetic studies of lipases solubilized in reverse micelles. Biochemistry, 32, 4029-4034.

Walde, P., Peng, Q., Fadnavis, N. W., Battistel, E. and Luisi, P. L. (1988) Structure and activity of trypsin in reverse micelles. Eur J Biochem, 173, 401-409.

Whateley, T. L. (1996) Microcapsules: preparation by interfacial polymerisation and interfacial complexation and their applications. In Benita, S. (ed.), Microencapsulation: methods and industrial applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 349-375.

Wick, R. and Luisi, P. L. (1996) Enzyme-containing liposomes can endogenously produce membrane-constituting lipids. Chem Biol, 3, 277-285.

Zhang, Z. Y., Thieme-Sefler, A. M., Maclean, D., McNamara, D. J., Dobrusin, E. M., Sawyer, T. K., and Dixon, J. E. (1993). Substrate specificity of the protein tyrosine phosphatases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 4446-4450.

All publications mentioned in the above specification, and references cited in said publications, are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the described methods and system of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in molecular biology or related fields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring a reaction, the method comprising: (a) forming a plurality of aqueous droplets comprising a first aqueous fluid surrounded by an a perfluorocarbon oil comprising a fluorosurfactant, each aqueous droplet comprising a single cell, comprising a gene that encodes an a biological enzyme and a plurality of molecules that modulate an activity of the biological enzyme;(b) flowing the plurality of aqueous droplets through a microfluidic channel; conducting in at least one of the plurality of aqueous droplets a first reaction involving the gene and a molecule from among the plurality of molecules while the plurality of aqueous droplets are flowing through the microfluidic channels to produce the biological enzyme in at least one of the cells;(c) flowing a second aqueous fluid comprising a fluorogenic substrate that is specific for the biological enzyme through a second microfluidic channel to a junction between the first and second microfluidic channels to introduce the fluorogenic substrate into the plurality of aqueous droplets to form a plurality of merged aqueous droplets, thereby causing an enzyme-catalyzed reaction involving the fluorogenic substrate to produce a reaction product in the at least one of the cells: and(d) optically detecting the merged aqueous droplets that contain cells comprising the reaction product by flow cytometry.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the optical detecting step detects a fluorescent signal.
3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising sorting the plurality of aqueous droplets.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of molecules and the fluorogenic substrate are attached to microbeads.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the plurality of molecules and the fluorogenic substrate are covalently attached to the microbeads.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the plurality of molecules and the fluorogenic substrate are non-covalently attached to the microbeads.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of molecules are attached to a plurality of microbeads.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the plurality of molecules is attached to each of the plurality of microbeads via a linker.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the plurality of molecules are attached to each of the plurality of microbeads via a cleavable linker.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the plurality of microbeads further comprises an optical tag.

Priority Claims (1)

Number	Date	Country	Kind
0307428.3	Mar 2003	GB	national

Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/238,257, filed Sep. 29, 2005, allowed, which is a continuation of PCT/GB2004/001352, filed Mar. 31, 2004, which claims priority to United Kingdom application GB0307428.3, filed Mar. 31, 2003, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (679)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
2097692	Fiegel	Nov 1937	A
2164172	Dalton	Jun 1939	A
2656508	Coulter	Oct 1953	A
2692800	Nichols et al.	Oct 1954	A
2797149	Skeggs	Jun 1957	A
2879141	Skeggs	Mar 1959	A
2971700	Peeps	Feb 1961	A
3479141	Smythe et al.	Nov 1969	A
3608821	Simm et al.	Sep 1971	A
3698635	Sickles	Oct 1972	A
3816331	Brown, Jr. et al.	Jun 1974	A
3930061	Scharfenberger	Dec 1975	A
3960187	Stock et al.	Jun 1976	A
3980541	Aine	Sep 1976	A
3982541	L'Esperance, Jr.	Sep 1976	A
4014469	Sato	Mar 1977	A
4022575	Hansen et al.	May 1977	A
4034966	Suh et al.	Jul 1977	A
4059552	Zweigle et al.	Nov 1977	A
4091042	Alexanderson et al.	May 1978	A
4117550	Folland et al.	Sep 1978	A
4130394	Negersmith	Dec 1978	A
4210809	Pelavin	Jul 1980	A
4253846	Smythe et al.	Mar 1981	A
4266721	Sickles	May 1981	A
4279345	Allred	Jul 1981	A
4297345	Howarth	Oct 1981	A
4315754	Ruzicka et al.	Feb 1982	A
4378957	Malkin et al.	Apr 1983	A
4383767	Jido	May 1983	A
4439980	Biblarz et al.	Apr 1984	A
4508265	Jido	Apr 1985	A
4533634	Maldonado et al.	Aug 1985	A
4585209	Aine et al.	Apr 1986	A
4618476	Columbus	Oct 1986	A
4675285	Clark et al.	Jun 1987	A
4676274	Brown	Jun 1987	A
4683195	Mullis et al.	Jul 1987	A
4683202	Mullis	Jul 1987	A
4739044	Stabinsky	Apr 1988	A
4757141	Fung et al.	Jul 1988	A
4767515	Scott et al.	Aug 1988	A
4767929	Valentine	Aug 1988	A
4779805	Jackson et al.	Oct 1988	A
4801086	Noakes	Jan 1989	A
4801529	Perlman	Jan 1989	A
4829996	Noakes et al.	May 1989	A
4853336	Saros et al.	Aug 1989	A
4865444	Green et al.	Sep 1989	A
4883750	Whiteley et al.	Nov 1989	A
4908112	Pace	Mar 1990	A
4931225	Cheng	Jun 1990	A
4941959	Scott	Jul 1990	A
4962885	Coffee	Oct 1990	A
4963498	Hillman et al.	Oct 1990	A
4981580	Auer	Jan 1991	A
4996004	Bucheler et al.	Feb 1991	A
5091652	Mathies et al.	Feb 1992	A
5096615	Prescott et al.	Mar 1992	A
5122360	Harris et al.	Jun 1992	A
5180662	Sitkovsky	Jan 1993	A
5185099	Delpuech et al.	Feb 1993	A
5188290	Gebauer et al.	Feb 1993	A
5188291	Cross	Feb 1993	A
5204112	Hope et al.	Apr 1993	A
5207973	Harris et al.	May 1993	A
5241159	Chatteriee et al.	Aug 1993	A
5260466	McGibbon	Nov 1993	A
5262027	Scott	Nov 1993	A
5270163	Gold et al.	Dec 1993	A
5296375	Kricka et al.	Mar 1994	A
5304487	Wilding et al.	Apr 1994	A
5310653	Hanausek-Walaszek et al.	May 1994	A
5313009	Guenkel et al.	May 1994	A
5344594	Sheridon	Sep 1994	A
5378957	Kelly	Jan 1995	A
5397605	Barbieri et al.	Mar 1995	A
5399461	Van et al.	Mar 1995	A
5399491	Kacian et al.	Mar 1995	A
5403617	Haaland	Apr 1995	A
5413924	Kosak et al.	May 1995	A
5417235	Wise et al.	May 1995	A
5427946	Kricka et al.	Jun 1995	A
5445934	Fodor et al.	Aug 1995	A
5452878	Gravesen et al.	Sep 1995	A
5452955	Lundstrom	Sep 1995	A
5454472	Benecke et al.	Oct 1995	A
5460945	Springer et al.	Oct 1995	A
5475096	Gold et al.	Dec 1995	A
5480614	Kamahori	Jan 1996	A
5486335	Wilding et al.	Jan 1996	A
5498392	Wilding et al.	Mar 1996	A
5500415	Dollat et al.	Mar 1996	A
5503851	Mank et al.	Apr 1996	A
5512131	Kumar et al.	Apr 1996	A
5516635	Ekins et al.	May 1996	A
5518709	Sutton et al.	May 1996	A
5523162	Franz et al.	Jun 1996	A
5587128	Wilding et al.	Dec 1996	A
5604097	Brenner	Feb 1997	A
5612188	Shuler et al.	Mar 1997	A
5616478	Chetverin et al.	Apr 1997	A
5617997	Kobayashi et al.	Apr 1997	A
5635358	Wilding et al.	Jun 1997	A
5636400	Young	Jun 1997	A
5641658	Adams et al.	Jun 1997	A
5643729	Taniguchi et al.	Jul 1997	A
5655517	Coffee	Aug 1997	A
5656155	Norcross et al.	Aug 1997	A
5661222	Hare	Aug 1997	A
5662874	David	Sep 1997	A
5670325	Lapidus et al.	Sep 1997	A
5681600	Antinone et al.	Oct 1997	A
5695934	Brenner	Dec 1997	A
5726026	Wilding et al.	Mar 1998	A
5726404	Brody	Mar 1998	A
5733526	Trevino et al.	Mar 1998	A
5739036	Parris	Apr 1998	A
5744366	Kricka et al.	Apr 1998	A
5750988	Apffel et al.	May 1998	A
5762775	DePaoli et al.	Jun 1998	A
5779868	Parce et al.	Jul 1998	A
5783431	Peterson et al.	Jul 1998	A
5840506	Giordano	Nov 1998	A
5846719	Brenner et al.	Dec 1998	A
5849491	Radomski et al.	Dec 1998	A
5858187	Ramsey et al.	Jan 1999	A
5858655	Arnold	Jan 1999	A
5858670	Lam et al.	Jan 1999	A
5863722	Brenner	Jan 1999	A
5868322	Loucks, Jr. et al.	Feb 1999	A
5872010	Karger et al.	Feb 1999	A
5876771	Sizer et al.	Mar 1999	A
5880071	Parce et al.	Mar 1999	A
5882680	Suzuki et al.	Mar 1999	A
5884846	Tan	Mar 1999	A
5887755	Hood, III	Mar 1999	A
5888746	Tabiti et al.	Mar 1999	A
5888778	Shuber	Mar 1999	A
5904933	Riess et al.	May 1999	A
5921678	Desai et al.	Jul 1999	A
5927852	Serafin	Jul 1999	A
5928870	Lapidus et al.	Jul 1999	A
5932100	Yager et al.	Aug 1999	A
5935331	Naka et al.	Aug 1999	A
5942056	Singh	Aug 1999	A
5942443	Parce et al.	Aug 1999	A
5958203	Parce et al.	Sep 1999	A
5972187	Parce et al.	Oct 1999	A
5980936	Krafft et al.	Nov 1999	A
5989815	Skolnick et al.	Nov 1999	A
5989892	Nishimaki et al.	Nov 1999	A
5995341	Tanaka et al.	Nov 1999	A
5997636	Gamarnik et al.	Dec 1999	A
6008003	Haak-Frendscho et al.	Dec 1999	A
6023540	Walt et al.	Feb 2000	A
6028066	Unger	Feb 2000	A
6042709	Parce et al.	Mar 2000	A
6045755	Lebl et al.	Apr 2000	A
6046056	Parce et al.	Apr 2000	A
6048551	Hilfinger et al.	Apr 2000	A
6103537	Ullman et al.	Apr 2000	A
6068199	Coffee	May 2000	A
6080295	Parce et al.	Jun 2000	A
6086740	Kennedy	Jul 2000	A
6096495	Kasai et al.	Aug 2000	A
6105571	Coffee	Aug 2000	A
6105877	Coffee	Aug 2000	A
6116516	Ganan-Calvo	Sep 2000	A
6118849	Tanimori et al.	Sep 2000	A
6119953	Ganan-Calvo et al.	Sep 2000	A
6120666	Jacobson et al.	Sep 2000	A
6124388	Takai et al.	Sep 2000	A
6124439	Friedman et al.	Sep 2000	A
6130052	Van Baren et al.	Oct 2000	A
6130098	Handique et al.	Oct 2000	A
6137214	Raina	Oct 2000	A
6138077	Brenner	Oct 2000	A
6139303	Reed et al.	Oct 2000	A
6140053	Koster	Oct 2000	A
6143496	Brown et al.	Nov 2000	A
6149789	Benecke et al.	Nov 2000	A
6150180	Parce et al.	Nov 2000	A
6150516	Brenner et al.	Nov 2000	A
6165778	Kedar	Dec 2000	A
6171796	An et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6171850	Nagle et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6172214	Brenner	Jan 2001	B1
6172218	Brenner	Jan 2001	B1
6174160	Lee et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6174469	Ganan-Calvo	Jan 2001	B1
6180372	Franzen	Jan 2001	B1
6184012	Neri et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6187214	Ganan-Calvo	Feb 2001	B1
6189803	Ganan-Calvo	Feb 2001	B1
6196525	Ganan-Calvo	Mar 2001	B1
6197335	Sherman	Mar 2001	B1
6197835	Ganan-Calvo	Mar 2001	B1
6203993	Shuber et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6210396	MacDonald et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6210891	Nyren et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6210896	Chan	Apr 2001	B1
6214558	Shuber et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6221654	Quake et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6227466	Hartman et al.	May 2001	B1
6234402	Ganan-Calvo	May 2001	B1
6235383	Hong et al.	May 2001	B1
6235475	Brenner et al.	May 2001	B1
6241159	Ganan-Calvo et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6243373	Turock	Jun 2001	B1
6248378	Ganan-Calvo	Jun 2001	B1
6251661	Urabe et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6252129	Coffee	Jun 2001	B1
6258568	Nyren	Jul 2001	B1
6258858	Nakajima et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6263222	Diab et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6266459	Walt et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6267353	Friedline et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6267858	Parce et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6268165	O'Brien	Jul 2001	B1
6268222	Chandler et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6274320	Rothberg et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6274337	Parce et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6294344	O'Brien	Sep 2001	B1
6296673	Santarsiero et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6299145	Ganan-Calvo	Oct 2001	B1
6301055	Legrand et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6306659	Parce et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6310354	Hanninen et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6310653	Malcolm, Jr. et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6316208	Roberts et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6316213	O'Brien	Nov 2001	B1
6318640	Coffee	Nov 2001	B1
6336463	Ohta	Jan 2002	B1
6344325	Quake et al.	Feb 2002	B1
6352828	Brenner	Mar 2002	B1
6355193	Stott	Mar 2002	B1
6355198	Kim et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6357670	Ganan-Calvo	Mar 2002	B2
6386463	Ganan-Calvo	May 2002	B1
6391559	Brown et al.	May 2002	B1
6394429	Ganan-Calvo	May 2002	B2
6399339	Wolberg et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6399389	Parce et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6403373	Scanlan et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6405936	Ganan-Calvo	Jun 2002	B1
6408878	Unger et al.	Jun 2002	B2
6409832	Weigl et al.	Jun 2002	B2
6429025	Parce et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6429148	Chu et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6432143	Kubiak et al.	Aug 2002	B2
6432148	Ganan-Calvo	Aug 2002	B1
6432630	Blankenstein	Aug 2002	B1
6439103	Miller	Aug 2002	B1
6440706	Vogelstein et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6450139	Watanabe	Sep 2002	B1
6450189	Ganan-Calvo	Sep 2002	B1
6454193	Busick et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6464336	Sharma	Oct 2002	B1
6464886	Ganan-Calvo	Oct 2002	B2
6475441	Parce et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6481648	Zimmermann	Nov 2002	B1
6489103	Griffiths et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6503933	Moloney et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6506609	Wada et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6508988	Van Dam et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6520425	Reneker	Feb 2003	B1
6524456	Ramsey et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6540395	Muhlbauer et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6540895	Spence et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6551836	Chow et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6553944	Allen et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6553960	Yoshikawa et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6554202	Ganan-Calvo	Apr 2003	B2
6557334	Jager	May 2003	B2
6557834	Ganan-Calvo	May 2003	B2
6558944	Parce et al.	May 2003	B1
6558960	Parce et al.	May 2003	B1
6560030	Legrand et al.	May 2003	B2
6565010	Anderson et al.	May 2003	B2
6569631	Pantoliano et al.	May 2003	B1
6576420	Carson et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6591852	McNeely et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6592321	Bonker et al.	Jul 2003	B2
6592821	Wada et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6608726	Legrand et al.	Aug 2003	B2
6610499	Fulwyler et al.	Aug 2003	B1
6614598	Quake et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6627603	Bibette et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6630006	Santarsiero et al.	Oct 2003	B2
6630353	Parce et al.	Oct 2003	B1
6632619	Harrison et al.	Oct 2003	B1
6638749	Beckman et al.	Oct 2003	B1
6645432	Anderson et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6646253	Rohwer et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6653626	Fischer et al.	Nov 2003	B2
6656267	Newman	Dec 2003	B2
6659370	Inoue	Dec 2003	B1
6660252	Matathia et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6670142	Lau et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6679441	Borra et al.	Jan 2004	B1
6680178	Harris et al.	Jan 2004	B2
6682890	Mack et al.	Jan 2004	B2
6717136	Andersson et al.	Apr 2004	B2
6729561	Hirae et al.	May 2004	B2
6739036	Koike et al.	May 2004	B2
6744046	Valaskovic et al.	Jun 2004	B2
6752922	Huang et al.	Jun 2004	B2
6753147	Vogelstein et al.	Jun 2004	B2
6766817	Da Silva	Jul 2004	B2
6767194	Jeon et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6767704	Waldman et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6790328	Jacobson et al.	Sep 2004	B2
6793753	Unger et al.	Sep 2004	B2
6797056	David	Sep 2004	B2
6800849	Staats	Oct 2004	B2
6806058	Jesperson et al.	Oct 2004	B2
6808382	Lanfranchi	Oct 2004	B2
6808882	Griffiths et al.	Oct 2004	B2
6814980	Levy et al.	Nov 2004	B2
6818395	Quake et al.	Nov 2004	B1
6832787	Renzi	Dec 2004	B1
6833242	Quake et al.	Dec 2004	B2
6841350	Ogden et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6872250	David et al.	Mar 2005	B2
6890487	Sklar et al.	May 2005	B1
6897018	Yuan et al.	May 2005	B1
6905844	Kim	Jun 2005	B2
6918404	Dias da Silva	Jul 2005	B2
6926313	Renzi	Aug 2005	B1
6935768	Lowe et al.	Aug 2005	B2
6936417	Orntoft	Aug 2005	B2
6942978	O'Brien	Sep 2005	B1
6949342	Golub et al.	Sep 2005	B2
6960437	Enzelberger et al.	Nov 2005	B2
6974667	Horne et al.	Dec 2005	B2
6998232	Feinstein et al.	Feb 2006	B1
7022472	Robbins et al.	Apr 2006	B2
7041481	Anderson et al.	May 2006	B2
7049072	Seshi	May 2006	B2
7056674	Baker et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7057026	Barnes et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7068874	Wang et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7066586	Da Silva	Jul 2006	B2
7078180	Genetta	Jul 2006	B2
7081192	Wang et al.	Jul 2006	B1
7081340	Baker et al.	Jul 2006	B2
7090983	Muramatsu et al.	Aug 2006	B1
7115230	Sundararajan et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7118910	Unger et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7129091	Ismagilov et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7138233	Griffiths et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7153700	Pardee et al.	Dec 2006	B1
7156917	Moriyama et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7163801	Reed	Jan 2007	B2
7169560	Lapidus et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7171311	Dai et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7198899	Schleyer et al.	Apr 2007	B2
7204431	Li et al.	Apr 2007	B2
7229770	Price et al.	Jun 2007	B1
7252943	Griffiths et al.	Aug 2007	B2
7267938	Anderson et al.	Sep 2007	B2
7268167	Higuchi et al.	Sep 2007	B2
7282337	Harris	Oct 2007	B1
7291462	O'Brien et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7294503	Quake et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7300765	Patel	Nov 2007	B2
7308364	Shaughnessy et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7314721	Gure et al.	Jan 2008	B2
7316906	Chiorazzi et al.	Jan 2008	B2
7326529	Ali et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7332280	Levy et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7332590	Nacht et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7341211	Ganan Calvo et al.	Mar 2008	B2
7348142	Wang	Mar 2008	B2
7358231	McCaffey et al.	Apr 2008	B1
7361474	Siegler	Apr 2008	B2
7364862	Ali et al.	Apr 2008	B2
7368255	Bae et al.	May 2008	B2
7378233	Sidransky et al.	May 2008	B2
7378280	Quake et al.	May 2008	B2
7390463	He et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7393665	Brenner	Jul 2008	B2
7416851	Davi et al.	Aug 2008	B2
7429467	Holliger et al.	Sep 2008	B2
7432064	Salceda et al.	Oct 2008	B2
7442507	Polsky et al.	Oct 2008	B2
7449303	Coignet	Nov 2008	B2
7468271	Golovchenko et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7473530	Huttemann	Jan 2009	B2
7473531	Domon et al.	Jan 2009	B1
7476506	Schleyer et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7479370	Coignet	Jan 2009	B2
7479371	Ando et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7479376	Waldman et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7482129	Soyupak et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7501244	Reinhard et al.	Mar 2009	B2
7504214	Erlander et al.	Mar 2009	B2
7507532	Chang et al.	Mar 2009	B2
7507541	Raitano et al.	Mar 2009	B2
7510707	Platica et al.	Mar 2009	B2
7510842	Podust et al.	Mar 2009	B2
7514209	Dai et al.	Apr 2009	B2
7514210	Holliger et al.	Apr 2009	B2
7524633	Sidransky	Apr 2009	B2
7527933	Sahin et al.	May 2009	B2
7537897	Brenner et al.	May 2009	B2
7541383	Fu et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7544473	Brenner	Jun 2009	B2
7556776	Fraden et al.	Jul 2009	B2
7582446	Griffiths et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7622081	Chou et al.	Nov 2009	B2
7632562	Nair et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7635562	Harris et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7638276	Griffiths et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7655435	Holliger et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7655470	Ismagilov et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7666593	Lapidus	Feb 2010	B2
7691576	Holliger et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7698287	Becker et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7708949	Stone et al.	May 2010	B2
7718578	Griffiths et al.	May 2010	B2
7736890	Sia et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7741130	Lee, Jr. et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7814175	Chang et al.	Oct 2010	B1
7824889	Vogelstein et al.	Nov 2010	B2
7888017	Quake et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7897044	Hoyos et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7897341	Griffiths et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7901939	Ismagliov et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7968287	Griffiths et al.	Jun 2011	B2
8012382	Kim et al.	Sep 2011	B2
8153402	Holliger et al.	Apr 2012	B2
20010010338	Ganan-Calvo	Aug 2001	A1
20010020011	Mathiowitz et al.	Sep 2001	A1
20010023078	Bawendi et al.	Sep 2001	A1
20010029983	Unger et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20010034031	Short et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20010041343	Pankowsky	Nov 2001	A1
20010041344	Sepetov et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010042793	Ganan-Calvo	Nov 2001	A1
20010048900	Bardell et al.	Dec 2001	A1
20010050881	Depaoli et al.	Dec 2001	A1
20020004532	Matathia et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020005354	Spence et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020008028	Jacobson et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020012971	Mehta	Jan 2002	A1
20020022038	Biatry et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020022261	Anderson et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020033422	Ganan-Calvo	Mar 2002	A1
20020036139	Becker et al.	Mar 2002	A1
20020058332	Quake et al.	May 2002	A1
20020067800	Newman et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020119459	Griffiths	Aug 2002	A1
20020143437	Handique et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020155080	Glenn et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020158027	Moon et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020164271	Ho	Nov 2002	A1
20020164629	Quake et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20030012586	Iwata et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030015425	Bohm et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030017579	Corn et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030039169	Ehrfeld et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030059764	Ravkin et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030061687	Hansen et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030064414	Benecky et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030082795	Shuler et al.	May 2003	A1
20030124586	Griffiths et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030144260	Gilon	Jul 2003	A1
20030148544	Nie et al.	Aug 2003	A1
20030183525	Elrod et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030224509	Moon et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030229376	Sandhu	Dec 2003	A1
20030230486	Chien et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030232356	Dooley et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040005582	Shipwash	Jan 2004	A1
20040005594	Holliger et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040018525	Wirtz et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040027915	Lowe et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040037813	Simpson et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040041093	Schultz et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040050946	Wang et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040053247	Cordon-Cardo et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040068019	Higuchi et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040071781	Chattopadhyay et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040079881	Fischer et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040096515	Bausch et al.	May 2004	A1
20040136497	Meldrum et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040146921	Eveleigh et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040159633	Whitesides et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040181131	Maynard et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040181343	Wigstrom et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040182712	Basol	Sep 2004	A1
20040188254	Spaid	Sep 2004	A1
20040224419	Zheng et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040253731	Holliger et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040258203	Yamano et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050032238	Karp et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050032240	Lee et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050037392	Griffiths et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050042648	Griffiths et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050048467	Sastry et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050064460	Holliger et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050069920	Griffiths et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050079510	Berka et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050084923	Mueller et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050087122	Ismagliov et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050095611	Chan et al.	May 2005	A1
20050100895	Waldman et al.	May 2005	A1
20050129582	Breidford et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050152908	Liew et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050164239	Griffiths et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050170431	Ibrahim et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050172476	Stone et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050183995	Deshpande et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050207940	Butler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050221339	Griffiths et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050226742	Unger et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050227264	Nobile et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050260566	Fischer et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050272159	Ismagilov et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060003347	Griffiths et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060003429	Frost et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060003439	Ismagilov et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060036348	Handique et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060046257	Pollock et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060051329	Lee et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060078888	Griffiths et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060078893	Griffiths	Apr 2006	A1
20060094119	Ismagilov et al.	May 2006	A1
20060108012	Barrow et al.	May 2006	A1
20060110759	Paris et al.	May 2006	A1
20060115821	Einstein et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20060147909	Rarbach et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060153924	Griffiths et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060154298	Griffiths et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060160762	Zetter et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060163385	Link et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060169800	Rosell et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060195269	Yeatman et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060223127	Yip et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060234254	An et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060234259	Rubin et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060252057	Raponi et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060258841	Michl et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060263888	Fritz et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060269558	Murphy et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060269971	Diamandis	Nov 2006	A1
20060281089	Gibson et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070003442	Link	Jan 2007	A1
20070026439	Faulstich et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070053896	Ahmed et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070054119	Garstecki et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070056853	Aizenberg et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070077572	Tawfik et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070077579	Griffiths et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070092914	Griffiths et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070120899	Ohnishi et al.	May 2007	A1
20070154889	Wang	Jul 2007	A1
20070166705	Milton et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070184439	Guilford et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070184489	Griffiths et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070195127	Ahn et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070259351	Chinitz et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070259368	An et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070259374	Griffiths et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070292869	Becker et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080003142	Link et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080009005	Kruk	Jan 2008	A1
20080014589	Link et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080014590	Dahary et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080020940	Stedronsky et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080021330	Hwang et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080023330	Viovy et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080038754	Farias-Eisner et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080044828	Kwok	Feb 2008	A1
20080050378	Nakamura et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080050723	Belacel et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080053205	Pollack et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080057514	Goldenring	Mar 2008	A1
20080058432	Wang et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080063227	Rohrseitz	Mar 2008	A1
20080064047	Zetter et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080081330	Kahvejian	Apr 2008	A1
20080081333	Mori et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080092973	Lai	Apr 2008	A1
20080113340	Schlegel	May 2008	A1
20080118462	Alani et al.	May 2008	A1
20080138806	Chow et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080166772	Hollinger et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080171078	Gray	Jul 2008	A1
20080176211	Spence et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080176236	Tsao et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080181850	Thaxton et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080206756	Lee et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080222741	Chinnaiyan	Sep 2008	A1
20080234138	Shaughnessy et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080234139	Shaughnessy et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080268473	Moses et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080269157	Srivastava et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080274908	Chang	Nov 2008	A1
20080280302	Kebebew	Nov 2008	A1
20080286199	Livingston et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080286801	Arjol et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080286811	Moses et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080293578	Shaugnessy et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080311570	Lai	Dec 2008	A1
20080311604	Elting et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20090004687	Mansfield et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090005254	Griffiths et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090012187	Chu et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090017463	Bhowmick	Jan 2009	A1
20090021728	Heinz et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090023137	Van Der Zee et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090026082	Rothberg et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090029372	Wewer	Jan 2009	A1
20090042737	Katz et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090053700	Griffiths et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090053732	Vermesh et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090060797	Mathies et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090062144	Guo	Mar 2009	A1
20090068170	Weitz et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090075265	Budiman et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090075307	Fischer et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090075311	Karl	Mar 2009	A1
20090081237	D'Andrea et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090081685	Beyer et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090087849	Malinowski et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090092973	Erlander et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090098542	Budiman et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090098543	Budiman et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090118128	Liu et al.	May 2009	A1
20090124569	Bergan et al.	May 2009	A1
20090127454	Ritchie et al.	May 2009	A1
20090127589	Rothberg et al.	May 2009	A1
20090131353	Insel et al.	May 2009	A1
20090131543	Weitz et al.	May 2009	A1
20090191565	Lapidus et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090197248	Griffiths et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090197772	Griffiths et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090246788	Albert et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090325236	Griffiths et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20100003687	Simen et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100009353	Barnes et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100022414	Link et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100035252	Rothberg et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100075436	Urdea et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100105112	Holtze et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100111768	Banerjee et al.	May 2010	A1
20100124759	Wang et al.	May 2010	A1
20100136544	Agresti et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100137143	Rothberg et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100137163	Link et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100159592	Holliger et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100172803	Stone et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100188073	Rothberg et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100197507	Rothberg et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100213628	Bausch et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100233026	Ismagliov et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100282617	Rothberg et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100300559	Schultz et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100300895	Nobile et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100301398	Rothberg et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100304982	Hinz et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110000560	Miller et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110142734	Ismagliov et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110174622	Ismagilov et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110176966	Ismagilov et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110177494	Ismagilov et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110177586	Ismagilov et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110177609	Ismagilov et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110188717	Baudry et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110190146	Boehm et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110244455	Larson et al.	Oct 2011	A1
20110250597	Larson et al.	Oct 2011	A1
20110275063	Weitz et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20120010098	Griffiths et al.	Jan 2012	A1
20120015382	Weitz et al.	Jan 2012	A1
20120015822	Weitz et al.	Jan 2012	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (153)

Number	Date	Country
2004225691	Jun 2010	AU
2520548	Oct 2004	CA
0047130	Feb 1985	EP
0249007	Mar 1991	EP
0476178	Mar 1992	EP
0540281	Jul 1996	EP
0528580	Dec 1996	EP
0895120	Feb 1999	EP
1741482	Jan 2007	EP
1447127	Apr 2007	EP
2127736	Dec 2009	EP
0114854.3	Apr 1969	GB
1446998	Aug 1976	GB
2005224	Apr 1979	GB
2047880	Dec 1980	GB
2062225	May 1981	GB
2064114	Jun 1981	GB
2097692	Nov 1982	GB
0221053.2	Jun 1989	GB
WO 8402000	May 1984	WO
WO-9105058	Apr 1991	WO
WO-9107772	May 1991	WO
WO-9203734	Mar 1992	WO
WO-9221746	Dec 1992	WO
WO-9303151	Feb 1993	WO
WO-9308278	Apr 1993	WO
WO-9322053	Nov 1993	WO
WO-9322054	Nov 1993	WO
WO-9322055	Nov 1993	WO
WO-9322058	Nov 1993	WO
WO-9322421	Nov 1993	WO
WO-9416332	Jul 1994	WO
WO-9423738	Oct 1994	WO
WO-9424314	Oct 1994	WO
WO-9426766	Nov 1994	WO
WO-9800705	Jan 1995	WO
WO-9511922	May 1995	WO
WO-9519922	Jul 1995	WO
WO-9524929	Sep 1995	WO
WO-9533447	Dec 1995	WO
WO 9629629	Sep 1996	WO
WO-9634112	Oct 1996	WO
WO-9638730	Dec 1996	WO
WO-9640062	Dec 1996	WO
WO-9640723	Dec 1996	WO
WO-9700125	Jan 1997	WO
WO-9700442	Jan 1997	WO
WO-9704297	Feb 1997	WO
WO-9704748	Feb 1997	WO
WO-9723140	Jul 1997	WO
WO-9728556	Aug 1997	WO
WO-9739814	Oct 1997	WO
WO-9740141	Oct 1997	WO
WO-9745644	Dec 1997	WO
WO-9747763	Dec 1997	WO
WO-9800231	Jan 1998	WO
WO-9802237	Jan 1998	WO
WO 9810267	Mar 1998	WO
WO-9813502	Apr 1998	WO
WO-9823733	Jun 1998	WO
WO-9831700	Jul 1998	WO
WO-9833001	Jul 1998	WO
WO-9834120	Aug 1998	WO
WO-9837186	Aug 1998	WO
WO-9841869	Sep 1998	WO
WO-9852691	Nov 1998	WO
WO-9858085	Dec 1998	WO
WO 9902671	Jan 1999	WO
WO 9902671	Jan 1999	WO
WO-9922858	May 1999	WO
WO-9928020	Jun 1999	WO
WO-9931019	Jun 1999	WO
WO-9954730	Oct 1999	WO
WO-9961888	Dec 1999	WO
WO-0004139	Jan 2000	WO
WO-0047322	Feb 2000	WO
WO-0052455	Feb 2000	WO
WO 0040712	Jul 2000	WO
WO-0061275	Oct 2000	WO
WO-0070080	Nov 2000	WO
WO-0076673	Dec 2000	WO
WO-0112327	Feb 2001	WO
WO 0114589	Mar 2001	WO
WO-0118244	Mar 2001	WO
WO-0164332	Sep 2001	WO
WO-0168257	Sep 2001	WO
WO-0169289	Sep 2001	WO
WO-0172431	Oct 2001	WO
WO-0180283	Oct 2001	WO
WO 0189787	Nov 2001	WO
WO-0218949	Mar 2002	WO
WO-02022869	Mar 2002	WO
WO 0222869	Mar 2002	WO
WO 0223163	Mar 2002	WO
WO-02031203	Apr 2002	WO
WO 0231203	Apr 2002	WO
WO-02047665	Jun 2002	WO
WO 0268104	Jun 2002	WO
WO-0247665	Aug 2002	WO
WO-02060275	Aug 2002	WO
WO-02078845	Oct 2002	WO
WO 02103011	Dec 2002	WO
WO-02103363	Dec 2002	WO
WO-03011443	Feb 2003	WO
WO 03037302	May 2003	WO
WO-03044187	May 2003	WO
WO 03078659	Sep 2003	WO
WO-03099843	Dec 2003	WO
WO 04002627	Jan 2004	WO
WO 04024917	Mar 2004	WO
WO-2004018497	Mar 2004	WO
WO-2004038363	May 2004	WO
WO-2004069849	Aug 2004	WO
WO-2004074504	Sep 2004	WO
WO-2004083443	Sep 2004	WO
WO 04087308	Oct 2004	WO
WO 04088314	Oct 2004	WO
WO 04091763	Oct 2004	WO
WO-2004102204	Nov 2004	WO
WO-2004103565	Dec 2004	WO
WO-2005000970	Jan 2005	WO
WO-2005002730	Jan 2005	WO
WO 05021151	Mar 2005	WO
WO-2005103106	Nov 2005	WO
WO-2005118138	Dec 2005	WO
WO-2006002641	Jan 2006	WO
WO-2006009657	Jan 2006	WO
WO-2006027757	Mar 2006	WO
WO 06038035	Apr 2006	WO
WO 06040551	Apr 2006	WO
WO 06040554	Apr 2006	WO
WO-2006078841	Jul 2006	WO
WO 06096571	Sep 2006	WO
WO-2006101851	Sep 2006	WO
WO-2007021343	Feb 2007	WO
WO-2007030501	Mar 2007	WO
WO-2007081385	Jul 2007	WO
WO-2007081387	Jul 2007	WO
WO 07089541	Aug 2007	WO
WO-2007114794	Oct 2007	WO
WO-2007123744	Nov 2007	WO
WO-2007133710	Nov 2007	WO
WO-2007138178	Dec 2007	WO
WO-2008021123	Feb 2008	WO
WO-2008063227	May 2008	WO
WO-2008097559	Aug 2008	WO
WO-2008121342	Oct 2008	WO
WO-2008130623	Oct 2008	WO
WO-2009029229	Mar 2009	WO
WO-2010056728	May 2010	WO
WO-2010151776	Dec 2010	WO
WO-2011042564	Apr 2011	WO
WO-2011079176	Jun 2011	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (693)

Entry
Patel et al., Formation of Fluorinated Nonionic Surfactant Microemulsions in Hydrfluorocarbon 134a, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2003, 258, 345-353.
Yu, Environmental Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Photochemistry and Phototoxicity, J Environ Scie Health C Evnviron Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev, 2002, 20(2), 1-43.
Ammar et al., UV/Vis Absorption and Fluorescence Spectroscopic Study of Novel Symmetrical Biscoumarin Dyes, Dyes and Pigments, 2003, 57, 259-265.
Song et al., A Microfluidic System for Controlling Reaction Networks in Time, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42(7), 768-772.
Shimizu et al., Encapsulation of Biologically Active Proteins in a Multiple Emulsion, Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 1995, 59(3), 492-496.
Koeller et al., Enzymes for Chemical Synthesis, Nature, 2001, 409, 232-240.
Fingas et al., Studies of Water-in-Oil Emulsions: Stability Studies, Artic Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar, 1997, 1-20.
Cooper, GM, The Central Role of Enzymes as Biological Catalysts, The Cell: A Molecular Approach, 2000, 2nd Edition, 1-6.
Sadtler et al., Reverse Water-In-Fluorocarbon Emulsions as a Drug Delivery System: An In Vitro Study, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1999, 147, 309-315.
Manafi, M., New Developments in Chromogenic and Fluorogenic Culture Media, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2000, 60, 205-218. (Year: 2000).
Adang et al., “The Contribution of Combinatorial Chemistry to Lead Generation: An Interim Analysis”, Curr. Med. Chem., 8: 985-998 (2001).
Bernath et al., “In Vitro Compartmentalization by Double Emulsions: Sorting and Gene Enrichment by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting”, Anal. Biochem., 325: 151-157 (2004).
Burbaum, J.J., “Miniaturization Technologies in HTS: How Fast, How Small, How Soon? Drug Discovery”, Drug Discovery Today, 3(7): 313-322 (1998).
Curran, D.P., “Strategy-Level Separations in Organic Synthesis: From Planning to Practice”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 37: 1174-1196 (1998).
Czarnik, A.W., “Encoding Methods for Combinatorial Chemistry”, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 1: 60-66 (1997).
Davis et al., “Multiple Emulsions as Targetable Delivery Systems”, Meth. Enzymol., 149: 51-64 (1987).
Dickinson, E., “Emulsions and Droplet Size Control”, in Wedlock, D.J. (ed.), Controlled Particle, Droplet and Bubble Formulation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, Chapter 7, pp. 191-216 (1994).
Finch, C.A., “Industrial Microencapsulation: Polymers for Microcapsule Walls”, Encapsulation and Controlled Release, Spec. Publ.-R. Soc. Chem., pp. 1-12 (1993).
Fu et al., “An Integrated Microfabricated Cell Sorter”, Anal. Chem., 74: 2451-2457 (2002).
Fulton. et al., “Advanced Multiplexed Analysis with the FlowMetrix™ System”, Clin. Chem., 43: 1749-1756 (1997).
Ghadessy et al, “Directed Evolution of Polymerase Function by Compartmentalized Self-Replication”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 98(8): 4552-4557 (2001).
Gordon et al., “Solid Phase Synthesis—Designer Linkers for Combinatorial Chemistry: A Review”, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 74: 835-851 (1999).
Griffiths et al., “Isolation of High Affinity Human Antibodies Directly from Large Synthetic Repertoires”, EMBO. J., 13(14): 3245-3260 (1994).
Griffiths et al., “Directed Evolution of an Extremely Fast Phosphotriesterase by In Vitro Compartmentalization”, EMBO. J., 22(1) :24-35 (2003).
Guixe et al., “Ligand-Induced Conformational Transitions in Escherichia coli Phosphofructokinase 2: Evidence for an Allosteric Site for MgATP2”, Biochem., 37: 13269-12375 (1998).
Han et al., “Quantum-dot-tagged Microbeads for Multiplexed Optical Coding of Biomolecules”, Nat. Biotechnol., 19(7): 631-635 (2001).
Handen, J. S., “High-Throughput Screening-Challenges for the Future”, Drug Discov. World, pp. 47-50 (2002).
Heim et al., “Engineering Green Fluorescent Protein for Improved Brightness, Longer Wavelengths and Fluorescence Response Energy Transfer”, Curr. Biol., 6(2): 178-182 (1996).
Hergenrother et al., “Small-Molecule Microarrays: Covalent Attachment and Screening of Alcohol-Containing Small Molecules on Glass Slides”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122: 7849-7850 (2000).
Hildebrand et al., “Liquid-Liquid Solubility of Perfluoromethylcyclohexane with Benzene, Carbon Tetrachloride, Chlorobenzene, Chloroform and Toluene”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71: 22-25 (1949).
Holmes et al., “Reagents for Combinatorial Organic Synthesis: Development of a New O-Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Linder for Solid Phase Synthesis”, J. Org Chem., 60: 2318-2319 (1995).
Johannsson, A., “Heterogeneous Enzyme Immunoassays”, In Principles and Practice of Immunoassay, pp. 295-325 (1991).
Johannsson et al., “Amplification by Second Enzymes”, In ELISA and Other Solid Phase Immunoassays, Kemeny et al (ed.), Chapter 4, pp. 85-106 (1988).
Keij et al., “High-Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using a Frequency-Doubled Argon Ion Laser”, Cytometry, 19(3): 209-216 (1995).
Kerker, M., “Elastic and Inelastic Light Scattering in Flow Cytometry 1,2”, Cytometry, 4(1): 1-10 (1983).
Krafft et al., “Emulsions and Microemulsions with a Fluorocarbon Phase”, Curr. Op. Colloid Interface Sci., 8: 251-258 (2003).
Link et al., “Geometrically Mediated Breakup of Drops in Microfluidic Devices”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(5): 054503-1 thru 054503-4 (2004).
Lipinski et al., “Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings”, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 46: 3-26 (2001).
Lowe, K. C., “Perfluorochemical Respiratory Gas Carriers: Benefits to Cell Culture Systems”, J. Fluorine Chem., 118: 19-26 (2002).
Luisi et al., “Activity and Conformation of Enzymes in Reverse Micellar Solutions”, Meth. Enzymol., 136: 188-216 (1987).
Lyne, P.D., “Structure-Based Virtual Screening: An Overview”, Drug Discov. Today, 7(20): 1047-1055 (2002).
Mackenzie et al., “The Application of Flow Microfluorimetry to Biomedical Research and Diagnosis: A Review”, Dev. Biol. Stand., 64: 181-193 (1986).
Mahajan et al., “Bcl-2 and Bax Interactions in Mitochondria Probed with Green Florescent Protein and Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer”, Nat. Biotechnol. 16(6): 547-552 (1998).
Masui et al., “Probing of DNA-Binding Sites of Escherichia coli RecA Protein Utilizing 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-Sulfonic Acid”, Biochem., 37(35): 12133-12143 (1998).
Miyawaki et al., “Fluorescent Indicators for Ca2+ Based on Green Fluorescent Proteins and Calmodulin”, Nature, 388: 882-887 (1997).
Perelson, A.S., “Theoretical Studies of Clonal Selection: Minimal Antibody Repertoire Size and Reliability of Self-Non-Self Discrimination”, J. Theor. Biol., 81: 645-670 (1979).
Pirrung et al., “A General Method for the Spatially Defined Immobilization of Biomolecules on Glass Surfaces Using ‘Caged’ Biotin”, Bioconjug. Chem., 7: 317-321 (1996).
Qi et al., “Acid Beta-Glucosidase: Intrinsic Fluorescence and Conformational Changes Induced by Phospholipids and Saposin C”, Biochem., 37(33): 11544-11554 (1998).
Ramstrom et al., “Drug Discovery by Dynamic Combinatorial Libraries”, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 1(1): 26-36 (2002).
Riess, J.G., “Fluorous Micro- and Nanophases with a Biomedical Perspective”, Tetrahedron, 58: 4113-4131 (2002).
Rolland et al., “Review Article: Fluorescence Polarization Assay by Flow Cytometry”, J. Immunol. Meth., 76(1): 1-10 (1985).
Sadtler et al., “Achieving Stable, Reverse Water-in-Fluorocarbon Emulsions”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 35(17): 1976-1978 (1996).
Scott, R.L., “The Solubility of Fluorocarbons”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70: 4090-4093 (1948).
Sepp et al., “Microbead Display by In Vitro Compartmentalisation: Selection for Binding Using Flow Cytometry”, FEBS Lett., 532: 455-458 (2002).
Song et al., “A Microfluidic System for Controlling Reaction Networks in Time”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 42(7): 767-772 (2003).
Thorsen et al., “Dynamic Pattern Formation in a Vesticle-Generating Microfluidic Device”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(18): 4163-4166 (2001).
Umbanhowar et al., “Monodisperse Emulsions Generated via Drop Break Off in a Coflowing Steam”, Langmuir, 16: 347-351 (2000).
Voss, E. W., “Kinetic Measurements of Molecular Interactions by Spectrofluorometry”, J. Mol. Recognition, 6: 51-58 (1993).
Adang, A.E. et al., The contribution of combinatorial chemistry to lead generation: an interim analysis, Curr Med Chem 8: 985-998 (2001).
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,845, dated Jun. 14, 2010.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/698,298 dated May 20, 2011.
Affholter and F. Arnold, Engineering a Revolution, Chemistry in Britain, Apr. 1999, p. 48.
Agrawal and Tang, Site-specific functionalization of oligodeoxynucleotides for non-radioactive labelling, Tetrahedron Letters 31:1543-1546 (1990).
Aharoni et al., High-Throughput screens and selections of enzyme-encoding genes, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 9(2): 210-6 (2005).
Ahn et al., Dielectrophoretic manipulation of drops for high-speed microluidic sorting devices, Applied Phys Lett 88, 024104 (2006).
Allen et al., High throughput fluorescence polarization: a homogeneous alternative to radioligand binding for cell surface receptors J Biomol Screen. 5(2):63-9 (2000).
Altman et al., Solid-state laser using a rhodamine-doped silica gel compound, IEEE Photonics technology letters 3(3):189-190 (1991).
Amstutz, P. et al., In vitro display technologies: novel developments and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 12, 400-405 (2001).
Anarbaev et al., Klenow fragment and DNA polymerase alpha-primase fromserva calf thymus in water-in-oil microemulsions, Biochim Biophy Acta 1384:315-324 (1998).
Anderson et al., Preparation of a cell-free protein-synthesizing system from wheat germ, Methods Enzymol 101:635-44 (1983).
Anderson, J.E., Restriction endonucleases and modification methylases, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol., 3:24-30 (1993).
Ando, S. et al., PLGA microspheres containing plasmid DNA: preservation of supercoiled DNA via cryopreparation and carbohydrate stabilization, J Pharm Sci, 88(1):126-130 (1999).
Angell et al., Silicon micromechanical devices, Scientific American 248:44-55 (1983).
Anhuf et al., Determination of SMN1 and SMN2 copy number using TaqMan technology, Hum Mutat 22(1):74-78 (2003).
Anna et al., Formation of dispersions using flow focusing in microchannels, Applied Physics Letters,82(3): 364-366 (2003).
Arkin, M.R. et al., Probing the importance of second sphere residues in an esterolytic antibody by phage display, J Mol Biol 284(4):1083-94 (1998).
Armstrong et al., Multiple-Component Condensation Strategies for Combinatorial Library Synthesis, Acc. Chem. Res. 29(3):123-131 (1996).
Ashkin and Dziedzic, Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria, Science 235(4795):1517-20 (1987).
Ashkin et al., Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams, Nature 330:769-771 (1987).
Atwell, S. & Wells, J.A., Selection for Improved Subtiligases by Phage Display, PNAS 96: 9497-9502(1999).
Auroux, Pierre-Alain et al., Micro Total Analysis Systems. 2. Analytical Standard Operations and Applications, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 74, No. 12, 2002, pp. 2637-2652.
Baccarani et al., Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: isolation and characterization of two isozymes, Biochemistry 16(16):3566-72 (1977).
Baez et al., Glutathione transferases catalyse the detoxication of oxidized metabolites (o-quinones) of catecholamines and may serve as an antioxidant system preventing degenerative cellular processes, Biochem. J 324:25-28 (1997).
Bagwe et al, Improved drug delivery using microemulsions: rationale, recent progress, and new horizons, Crit Rev Ther Drug Carr Sys 18(1):77-140 (2001).
Baker, M., Clever PCR: more genotyping, smaller volumes, Nature Methods 7:351-356 (2010).
Ball and Schwartz, CMATRIX: software for physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling using a symbolic matrix representation system, Comput Biol Med 24(4):269-76 (1994).
Ballantyne and Nixon, Selective Area Metallization by Electron-Beam Controlled Direct Metallic Deposition, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10:1094 (1973).
Barany F., The ligase chain reaction in a PCR World, PCR Methods and Applications 1(1):5-16 (1991).
Barany, F. Genetic disease detection and DNA amplification using cloned thermostable ligase, PNAS 88(1): 189-93 (1991).
Baret et al., Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity, Lab on a Chip 9:1850-1858 (2009).
Baret et al., Kinetic aspects of emulsion stabilization by surfactants: a microfluidic analysis, Langmuir 25:6088-6093 (2009).
Bass et al., Hormone Phage: An Enrichment Method for Variant Proteins With Altered Binding Properties, Proteins 8:309-314(1990).
Bauer, J., Advances in cell separation: recent developments in counterflow centrifugal elutriation and continuous flow cell separation, J Chromotography, 722:55-69 (1999).
Beebe et al., Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels, Nature 404:588-590 (2000).
Beer et al., On-Chip, Real-Time, Single-Copy Polymerase Chain Reaction in Picoliter Droplets, Anal. Chem., 2007, v. 79, pp. 847-8475.
Bein, Thomas, Efficient Assays for Combinatorial methods for the Discovery of Catalysts, Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38:3, 323-26 (1999).
Benichou et al., Double Emulsions Stabilized by New Molecular Recognition Hybrids of Natural Polymers, Polym. Adv. Tehcnol 13:1019-1031 (2002).
Benner, S.A., Expanding the genetic lexicon: incorporating non-standard amino acids into proteins by ribosome-based synthesis, Trends Biotechnol 12:158-63 (1994).
Benning, M.M. et al., The binding of substrate analogs to phosphotriesterase. J Biol Chem, 275, 30556-30560 (2000).
Berman et al., An agarose gel electrophoresis assay for the detection of DNA-binding activities in yeast cell extracts, Methods Enzymol 155:528-37 (1987).
Bernath et al, In Vitro Compartmentalization by Double Emulsions: Sorting and Gene Enrichment by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting, Anal. Biochem 325:151-157 (2004).
Bernath et al., Directed evolution of protein inhibitors of DNA-nucleases by in vitro compartmentalization (IVC) and nano-droplet delivery, J. Mol. Biol 345(5):1015-26 (2005).
Betlach, L. et al., A restriction endonuclease analysis of the bacterial plasmid controlling the EcoRI restriction and modification of DNA. Federation Proceedings, 35, 2037-2043 (1976).
Bibette et al., Emulsions: basic principles, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62: 969-1033 (1999).
Bico, Jose et al., Rise of Liquids and Bubbles in Angular Capillary Tubes, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 247:162-166 (2002).
Bico, Jose et al., Self-Propelling Slugs, J. Fluid Mech., 467:101-127 (2002).
Blattner and Dahlberg, RNA synthesis startpoints in bacteriophage lambda: are the promoter and operator transcribed, Nature New Biol 237(77):227-32 (1972).
Boder et al., Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries, Nat Biotechnol 15(6):553-7 (1997).
Bougueleret, L. et al., Characterization of the gene coding for the EcoRV restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli, Nucleic Acids Res, 12(8):3659-76 (1984).
Boyum, A., Separation of leukocytes from blood and bone marrow. Introduction, Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 97:7 (1968).
Branebjerg et al., Fast mixing by lamination, MEMS Proceedings 9th Ann WO rkshop, San Diego, Feb. 11-15, 1996, 9:441-446 (1996).
Braslavsky et al., Sequence information can be obtained from single DNA molecules, PNAS 100(7):3960-3964 (2003).
Bringer et al., Microfluidic Systems for Chemical Kinetics That Rely on Chaotic Mixing in Droplets, Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 362:1-18 (2004).
Brody et al., A self-assembled microlensing rotational probe, Applied Physics Letters, 74:144-46 (1999).
Brown et al., Chemical synthesis and cloning of a tyrosine tRNA gene, Methods Enzymol 68:109-151 (1979).
Bru, R. et al., Catalytic activity of elastase in reverse micelles, Biochem Mol Bio Int, 31(4):685-92 (1993).
Bru, R. et al., Product inhibition of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles. Eur J Biochem 199(1): 95-103 (1991).
Brummelkamp et al., A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells, Science 296(5567):550-3 (2002).
Buckpitt et al.,Hepatic and pulmonary microsomal metabolism of naphthalene to glutathione adducts: factors affecting the relative rates of conjugate formation, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 231:291-300 (1984).
Buican et al., Automated single-cell manipulation and sorting by light trapping, Applied Optics 26(24):5311-5316 (1987).
Burbaum, J., Miniaturization technologies in HTS: how fast, how small, how soon Drug Discov Today 3:313-322 (1998).
Burns et al., Microfabricated structures for integrated DNA analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93:5556-5561(1996).
Burns, J.R. et al., The Intensification of Rapid Reactions in Multiphase Systems Using Slug Flow in Capillaries, Lab on a Chip, 1:10-15 (2001).
Burns, Mark et al., An Integrated Nanoliter DNA Analysis Device, Science, 282:484-487(1998).
Byrnes, P.J. et al., Sensitive fluorogenic substrates for the detection of trypsin-like proteases and pancreatic elastase, Anal Biochem, 126:447 (1982).
Cahill et al., Polymerase chain reaction and Q beta replicase amplification, Clin Chem 37(9):1482-5 (1991).
Caldwell, S.R. et al., Limits of diffusion in the hydrolysis of substrates by the phosphodiesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta, Biochemistry, 30: 7438-7444 (1991).
Calvert, P., Inkjet printing for materials and devices, Chem Mater 13: 3299-3305 (2001).
Caruthers, Gene synthesis machines: DNA chemistry and its uses, Science 230:281-285 (1985).
Chakrabarti, A.C. et al., Production of RNA by a polymerase protein encapsulated within phospholipid vesicles, J Mol Evol, 39(6):555-9 (1994).
Chamberlain and Ring, Characterization of T7-specific ribonucleic acid polymerase. 1. General properties of the enzymatic reaction and the template specificity of the enzyme, J Biol Chem 248:2235-44 (1973).
Chan, Emory M. et al., Size-Controlled Growth of CdSe Nanocrystals in Microfluidic Reactors, Nano Letters, 3(2):199-201(2003).
Chang and Su, Controlled double emulsification utilizing 3D PDMS microchannels, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 18:1-8 (2008).
Chang, T.M., Recycling of NAD(P) by multienzyme systems immobilized by microencapsulation in artifical cells, Methods Enzymol, 136(67):67-82 (1987).
Chao et al., Control of Concentration and Volume Gradients in Microfluidic Droplet Arrays for Protein Crystallization Screening, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Francisco, California Sep. 1-5, 2004.
Chao et al., Droplet Arrays in Microfluidic Channels for Combinatorial Screening Assays, Hilton Head 2004: A Solid State Sensor, Actuator and Microsystems Workshop, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, Jun. 6-10, 2004.
Chapman et al., In vitro selection of catalytic RNAs, Curr. op. Struct. Biol., 4:618-22 (1994).
Chayen, Crystallization with oils: a new dimension in macromolecular crystal growth Journal of Crystal Growth,196:434-441(1999).
Chen et al., Capturing a Photoexcited Molecular Structure Through Time-Domain X-ray Absorption Fine Structure, Science 292(5515):262-264 (2001).
Chen et al., Microfluidic Switch for Embryo and Cell Sorting the 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators, and Microsystems, Boston, MA Jun. 8-12, 2003 Transducers, 1: 659-662 (2003).
Chen-Goodspeed et al., Structural Determinants of the substrate and stereochemical specificity of phosphotriesterase, Biochemistry, 40(5):1325-31 (2001).
Chen-Goodspeed, M. et al., Enhancement, relaxation, and reversal of the stereoselectivity for phosphotriesterase by rational evolution of active site residues, Biochemistry, 40: 1332-1339 (2001b).
Cheng, Z.,et al, Electro flow focusing inmicrofluidic devices, Microfluidics Poster, presented at DBAS, Frontiers in Nanoscience, presented Apr. 10, 2003.
Chetverin and Spirin, Replicable RNA vectors: prospects for cell-free gene amplification, expression, and cloning, Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol, 51:225-70 (1995).
Chiang, C.M. et al., Expression and purification of general transcription factors by FLAG epitope-tagging and peptide elution, Pept Res, 6: 62-64 (1993).
Chiba et al., Controlled protein delivery from biodegradable tyrosino-containing poly(anhydride-co-imide) microspheres, Biomaterials, 18(13): 893-901 (1997).
Chiou et al., A closed-cylce capillary polymerase chain reaction machine, Analytical Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 73:2018-21 (2001).
Chiu et al., Chemical transformations in individual ultrasmall biomimetic containers, Science, 283: 1892-1895 (1999).
Chou et al., A mirofabricated device for sizing and sorting DNA molecules 96:11-13(1998).
Clackson, T. et al., In vitro selection from protein and peptide libraries, Trends Biotechnol, 12:173-84 (1994).
Clausell-Tormos et al., Droplet-based microfluidic platforms for the encapsulation and screening of Mammalian cells and multicellular organisms, Chem Biol 15(5):427-437 (2008).
Cohen, S. et al., Controlled delivery systems for proteins based on poly(lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres, Pharm Res, 8(6):713-720 (1991).
Collins et al., Optimization of Shear Driven Droplet Generation in a Microluidic Device, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Expo, Washington (2003).
Collins, J. et al., Microfluidic flow transducer based on the measurements of electrical admittance, Lab on a Chip, 4:7-10 (2004).
Compton, J., Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, Nature, 350(6313):91-2 (1991).
Cormack, B.P. et al., FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP), Gene 173(1):33-38 (1996).
Cortesi et al., Production of lipospheres as carriers for bioactive compounds, Biomateials, 23(11): 2283-2294 (2002).
Courrier et al., Reverse water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions and microemulsions obtained with a fluorinated surfactant, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 244:141-148 (2004).
Craig, D. et al., Fluorescence-based enzymatic assay by capillary electrophoresis laser-induced fluoresence detection for the determinination of a few alpha-galactosidase molecules, Anal. Biochem. 226: 147 (1995).
Creagh, A.L. et al., Structural and catalytic properties of enzymes in reverse micelles, Enzyme Microb Technol 15(5): 383-92 (1993).
Crosland-Taylor, A Device for Counting Small Particles suspended in a Fluid through a Tube, Nature 171:37-38 (1953).
Crowley, J. M., Electrical breakdown of bimolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability, Biophys J. 13(7):711-724 (1973).
Cull, M.G. et al., Screening for receptor ligands using large libraries of peptides linked to the C terminus of the lac repressor, PNAS 89:1865-9 (1992).
Curran, D.P., Strategy-level separations in organic synthesis: from planning to practice. Angew Chem Int Ed, 37: 1174-11-96 (1998).
Czarnik, A.W., Encoding methods for combinatorial chemistry, Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:60-66 (1997).
Dankwardt et al., Combinatorial synthesis of small-molecule libraries using 3-amino-5-hydroxybenzoic acid, 1:113-120 (1995).
Davis, J.A. et al., Deterministic hydrodynamics: Taking blood apart, PNAS 103:14779-14784 (2006).
Davis, S.S. et al., Multiple emulsions as targetable delivery systems, Methods in Enzymology, 149: 51-64 (1987).
De Gans, B.J. et al., Inkjet printing of polymers: state of the art and future developments, Advanced materials, 16: 203-213 (2004).
De-Bashan, L. E. et al., Removal of ammonium and phosphorus ions from synthetic wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris coimmobilized in alginate beads with the microalgae growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense, Water Research 36:2941-2948 (2002).
Delagrave, S. et al., Red-shifted excitation mutants of the green fluorescent protein, Biotechnology 13(2):151-4 (1995).
DelRaso, In vitro methodologies for enhanced toxicity testing, Toxicol. Lett. 68:91-99 (1993).
Demartis et al., A strategy for the isolation of catalytic activities from repertoires of enzymes displayed on phage, J. Mol. Biol 286:617-633 (1999).
Dickinson, E., Emulsions and droplet size control, Wedlock, D.J., Ed., in Controlled Particle Droplet and Bubble Formulation, ButterWO rth-Heine-mann, 191-257 (1994).
DiMatteo, et al., Genetic conversion of an SMN2 gene to SMN1: A novel approach to the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy, Exp Cell Res. 314(4):878-886 (2008).
Dinsmore et al., Colioidosomes: Selectively Permeable Capsules Composed of Colloidal Particles, Science 298(5595):1006-1009. (2002).
Dittrich et al., A new embedded process for compartmentalized cell-free protein expression and on-line detection in microfluidic devices, Chembiochem 6(5):811-814 (2005).
Doi et al., In vitro selection of restriction endonucleases by in vitro compartmentilization, Nucleic Acids Res, 32(12): e95 (2004).
Doi, N. and Yanagawa, H. STABLE: protein-DNA fusion system for screening of combinatorial protein libraries in vitro, FEBS Lett., 457: 227-230 (1999).
Doman, T.N. et al., Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B, J Med Chem, 45: 2213-2221 (2002).
Dove et al., In Brief, Nature Biotechnology 20:1213 (2002).
Dower et al., High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation, Nucleic Acids Res 16:6127-6145 (1988).
Dressman et al., Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations, PNAS 100:8817-22 (2003).
Dreyfus et al., Ordered and disordered patterns in two phase flows in microchannels, Phys Rev Lett 90(14):144505-1-144505-4 (2003).
Drmanac et al., Sequencing by hybridization: towards an automated sequencing of one million M13 clones arrayed on membranes, Elctrophoresis 13:566-573 (1992).
Duggleby, R. G. Enzyme Kinetics and Mechanisms, Pt D. Academic Press 249:61-90 (1995).
Dumas, D.P., Purification and properties of the phosphotriesterase from Psuedomonas diminuta, J Biol Chem 264: 19659-19665 (1989).
Eckert and Kunkel, DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction, Genome Res 1:17-24 (1991).
Edd et al., Controlled encapsulation of single-cells into monodisperse picolitre drops, Lab Chip 8(8):1262-1264 (2008).
Edel, Joshua B. et al., Microfluidic Routes to the Controlled Production of Nanopaticles, Chemical Communications, 1136-1137 (2002).
Edris et al., Encapsulation of orange oil in a spray dried double emulsion, Nahrung/Food, 45(2):133-137 (2001).
Effenhauser et al., Glass chips for high-speed capillary electrophoresis separations with submicrometer plate heights, Anal Chem 65:2637-2642 (1993).
Eggers, Jens et al., Coalescence of Liquid Drops, J. Fluid Mech.,401 : 293-310 (1999).
Ehrig, T. et al., Green-fluorescent protein mutants with altered fluorescence excitation spectra, Febs Lett, 367(2):163-66 (1995).
Eigen et al., Hypercycles and compartments: compartments assists—but does not replace—hypercyclic organization of early genetic information, J Theor Biol, 85:407-11 (1980).
Eigen et al., The hypercycle: coupling of RNA and protein biosynthesis in the infection cycle of an RNA bacteriophage, Biochemistry, 30:11005-18 (1991).
Eigen, Wie entsteht information Prinzipien der selbstorganisation in der biologie, Berichte der punsen-gesellschaft fur physikalische chemi, 80:1059-81 (1976).
Ellman et al., Biosynthetic method for introducing unnatural amino acids site-specifically into proteins, Methods Enzymol, 202:301-36 (1991).
Endo et al. Kinetic determination of trace cobalt by visual autocatalytic indication, Talanta 47:349-353 (1998).
Endo et al., Autocatalytic decomposition of cobalt complexes as an indicator system for the determination of trace amounts of cobalt and effectors, Analyst 121:391-394 (1996).
Eow et al., Electrocoalesce-separators for the separation of aqueous drops from a flowing dielectric viscous liquid, Separation and Purification Tech 29:63-77 (2002).
Eow et al., Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: a review of the technology, Chemical Engineeing Journal 85:357-368 (2002).
Eow et al., Motion, deformation and break-up of aqueous drops in oils under high electric field strengths, Chemical Eng Proc 42:259-272 (2003).
Eow et al., The behavior of a liquid-liquid interface and drop-interface coalescence under the influence of an electric field, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochern. Eng. Aspects 215:101-123 (2003).
Eow, et al. Electrostatic and hydrodynamic separation of aqueous drops in a flowing viscous oil, Chemical Eng Proc 41:649-657 (2002).
Extended European Search Report for EP 10181911.8 dated Jun. 1, 2011 (7 pages).
Extended European Search Report for EP 10184514.7 dated Dec. 20, 2010 (5 pages).
Faca et al., A mouse to human search for plasma proteome changes associated with pancreatic tumor development, PLoS Med 5(6):el23 (2008).
Fahy et al., Self-sustained sequence replication (3SR): an isothermal transcription-based amplification system alternative to PCR, PCR Methods Appl 1:25-33 (1991).
Fan and Harrison, Micromachining of capillary electrophoresis injectors and separators on glass chips and evaluation of flow at capillary intersections, Anal Chem 66:177-184 (1994).
Fastrez, J., In vivo versus in vitro screening or selection for catalytic activity in enzymes and abzymes, Mol Biotechnol 7(1):37-55 (1997).
Fettinger et al., Stacked modules for micro flow systems in chemical analysis: concept and studies using an enlarged model, Sens Actuat B. 17:19-25 (1993).
Fiedler et al., Dielectrophoretic sorting of particles and cells in a microsystem, Anal Chem 70(9):1909-1915 (1998).
Field, J. et al., Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cervisiae by use of an epitope addition method. Mol Cell Biol, 8: 2159-2165 (1988).
Fields, S. and Song, O., A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions, Nature 340(6230): 245-6 (1989).
Filella et al., TAG-72, CA 19.9 and CEA as tumor markers in gastric cancer, Acta Oncol. 33(7):747-751 (1994).
Finch, C.A., Encapsulation and controlled release, Spec Publ R Soc Chem, 138:35 (1993).
Fire & Xu, Rolling replication of short DNA circles, PNAS 92(10):4641-5 (1995).
Firestine, S.M. et al., Using an AraC-based three hybrid system to detect biocatalysts in vivo, Nat Biotechnol 18: 544-547 (2000).
Fisch et al., A strategy of exon shuffling for making large peptide repertoires displayed on filamentous bacteriophage, PNAS 93:7761-6 (1996).
Fisher et al., Cell Encapsulation on a Microfluidic Platform, The Eighth International Conference on Miniaturised Systems for Chemistry and Life Scieces, MicroTAS 2004, Sep. 26-30, Malmo, Sweden.
Fletcher et al., Micro reactors: principles and applications in organic synthesis, Tetrahedron 58:4735-4757 (2002).
Fluri et al., Integrated capillary electrophoresis devices with an efficient postcolumn reactor in planar quartz and glass chips, Anal Chem 68:4285-4290 (1996).
Fornusek, L. et al., Polymeric microspheres as diagnostic tools for cell surface marker tracing, Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, 2:137-74 (1986).
Fowler, Enhancement of Mixing by Droplet-Based Microfluidics, Int Conf MEMS 97-100 (2002).
Freese, E., The specific mutagenic effect of base analogues on Phage T4, J Mol Biol, 1: 87 (1959).
Frenz et al., Reliable microfluidic on-chip incubation of droplets in delay-lines, Lab on a Chip 9:1344-1348 (2008).
Fu et al., A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter, Nature Biotechnology, 17(11):1109-1111 (1999).
Fu et al., An Integrated Microfabricated Cell Sorter, Anal. Chem., 74: 2451-2457 (2002).
Fulton et al., Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system, Clin Chem 43:1749-1756 (1997).
Fulwyler, Electronic Separation of Biological Cells by Volume, Science 150(3698):910-911 (1965).
Gallarate et al., On the stability of ascorbic acid in emulsified systems for topical and cosmetic use, Int J Pharm 188(2):233-241 (1999).
Ganan-Calvo, A.M., Perfectly Monodisperse Microbubbling by Capillary Flow Focusing, Phys Rev Lett 87(27): 274501-1-4 (2001).
Garcia-Ruiz et al. A super-saturation wave of protein crystallization, J. Crystal Growth, 232:149-155(2001).
Garcia-Ruiz et al., Investigation on protein crystal growth by the gel acupuncture method{, Acta, Cryst., 1994, D50, 99. pp. 484-490.
Garstecki, et al., Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfiuidic flow-focusing device, Appl Phys Lett 85(13):2649-2651 (2004).
Gasperlin et al., The structure elucidation of semisolid w/o emulsion systems containing silicone surfactant, Intl J Pharm, 107:51-6 (1994).
Gasperlin et al., Viscosity prediction of lipophillic semisolid emulsion systems by neural network modeling, Intl J Pharm, 196:37-50 (2000).
Georgiou et al., Display of heterologous proteins on the surface of microorganisms: from the screenign of combinatiorial libraires to live recombinant vaccines. Nat Biotechnol 15(1), 29-34 (1997).
Georgiou, G., Analysis of large libraries of protein mutants using flow cytometry, Adv Protein Chem, 55: 293-315 (2000).
Gerdts et al., A Synthetic Reaction NetWork: Chemical Amplification Using Nonequilibrium Autocatalytic Reactions Coupled in Time, J. Am. Chem. Soc 126:6327-6331 (2004).
Ghadessy et al., Directed Evolution of Polymerase Function by Compartmentalized Self-Replication, PNSAS 98(8): 4552-4557 (2001).
Gibbs et al., Detection of single DNA base differences by competitive oligonucleotide priming, Nucleic Acids Res. 17(7): 2437-48 (1989).
Gilliland, G., Analysis of cytokine mRNA and DNA: Detection and quantitation by competitive polymerase chain reaction, PNAS, 87(7):2725-9 (1990).
Giusti et al., Synthesis and characterization of 5′ fluorescent dye labeled oligonucleotides, Genome Res 2:223-227 (1993).
Goodall, J. L. et al., Operation of Mixed-Culture Immobilized Cell Reactors for the Metabolism of Meta- and Para-Nitrobenzoate by Comamonas Sp. JS46 and Comamonas Sp. JS47, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 59 (1): 21-27 (1998).
Grasland-Mongrain et al., Droplet coalescence in microfluidic devices, 30 pages (Jul. 2003) From internet: http://www.eleves.ens.fr/home/grasland/rapports/stage4.pdf.
Gregoriadis, G., Enzyme entrapment in liposomes, Methods Enzymol 44:218-227 (1976).
Griffiths et al., Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires, Embo J 13(14):3245-60 (1994).
Griffiths et al., Man-made enzymes-from design to in vitro compartmentalisation, Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:338-353 (2000).
Griffiths, A., and Tawfik, D., Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets, Trend Biotech 24(9):395-402 (2006).
Griffiths, A.D. et al., Strategies for selection of antibodies by phage display, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 9:102-8 (1998).
Guatelli, J.C. et al., Isothermal, in vitro amplification of nucleic acids by a multienzyme reaction modeled after retroviral replication, PNAS, 87(5):1874-8 (1990).
Guixe et al., Ligand-Induced Conformational Transitions in Escherichia coli Phosphofructokinase 2: Evidence for an Allosteric Site for MgATP2n, Biochem., 37: 13269-12375 (1998).
Gupta, K.C., et al., A general method for the synthesis of 3′-sulfhydryl and phosphate group containing oligonucleotides, Nucl Acids Res 19 (11): 3019-3026 (1991).
Haber et al., Activity and spectroscopic properties of bovine liver catalase in sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate/isooctane reverse micelles, Eur J Biochem 217(2): 567-73 (1993).
Habig and Jakoby, Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases, Methods in Enzymology, 77: 398-405 (1981).
Hadd et al., Microchip Device for Performing Enzyme Assays, Anal. Chem 69(17): 3407-3412 (1997).
Haddad et al., A methodology for solving physiologically based pharmacokinetic models without the use of simulation software, Toxicol Lett. 85(2): 113-26 (1996).
Hagar and Spitzer, The effect of endotoxemia on concanavalin A induced alterations in cytoplasmic free calcium in rat spleen cells as determined with Fluo-3, Cell Calcium 13:123-130 (1992).
Hai et al., Investigation on the release of fluorescent markers from the w/o/w emulsions by fluorescence-activated cell sorter, J Control Release, 96(3): 393-402 (2004).
Haies et al., Morphometric study of rat lung cells. I. Numerical and dimensional characteristics of parenchymal cell population, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 123:533-54 (1981).
Hall, Experimental evolution of Ebg enzyme provides clues about the evolution of catalysis and to evolutionary potential, FEMS Microbiol Lett, 174(1):1-8 (1999).
Hall, The EBG system of E. coli: origin and evolution of a novel beta-galactosidase for the metabolism of lactose, Genetica 118(2-3):143-56 (2003).
Han et al., Quantum-dot-tagged Microbeads for Multiplexed Optical Coding of Biomolecules, Nat Biotech 19(7): 631-635 (2001).
Handen, J.S., High-throughput screening—challenges for the future, Drug Discov World, 47-50 (2002).
Handique, K. et al., On-Chip Thermopneumatic Pressure for Discrete Drop Pumping, Analytical Chemistry, 73:1831-1838 (2001).
Hanes et al., Degradation of porous poly(anhydide-co-imide) microspheres and implication for controlled macromolecule delivery, Biomaterials, 19(1-3): 163-172(1998).
Hansen et al., A robust and scalable microfluidic metering method that allows protein crystal growth by free interface diffusion, PNAS 99(26):16531-16536 (2002).
Harada et al., Monoclonal antibody G6K12 specific for membrane-associated differentiation marker of human stratified squamous epithelia and squamous cell carcinoma, J. Oral Pathol. Med 22(4):145-152 (1993).
Harder, K.W. et al., Characterization and kinetic analysis of the intracellular domain of human protein tyrosine phosphatase beta (HPTP beta) using synthetic phosphopeptides, Biochem J 298 (Pt 2): 395-401 (1994).
Harries et al., A Numerical Model for Segmented Flow in a Microreactor, Int J of Heat and Mass Transfer, 46:3313-3322 (2006).
Harris et al., Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome, Science 320(5872):106-109 (2008).
Harrison et al., Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis-based chemical analysis system on a chip, Science 261(5123):895-897 (1993).
Hasina et al., Plasminogen activator inhibitor-2: a molecular biomarker for head and neck cancer progression, Cancer Research 63:555-559 (2003).
Haynes Principles of Digital PCR and Measurement IssueOct. 15, 2012.
Hayward et al., Dewetting Instability during the Formation of Polymersomes from BloceCopolymer-Stabilized Double Emulsions, Langmuir, 22(10): 4457-4461 (2006).
He et al., Selective encapsulation of single cells and subcellular organelles into picoliter- and femtoliter-volume droplets, Anal Chem 77(6):1539-1544 (2005).
Heim et al., Engineering Green Fluorescent Protein for Improved Brightness, Longer Wavelengths and Fluorescence Response Energy Transfer, Carr. Biol, 6(2): 178-182 (1996).
Hellman et al., Differential tissue-specific protein markers of vaginal carcinoma, Br J Cancer, 100(8): 1303-131 (2009).
Hergenrother et al., Small-Molecule Microarrays: Covalent Attachment and Screening of Alcohol-Containing Small Molecules on Glass Slides, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 122: 7849-7850 (2000).
Hildebrand et al., Liquid-Liquid Solubility of Perfluoromethylcyclohexane with Benzene, Carbon Tetrachloride, Chlorobenzene, Chloroform and Toluene, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 71:22-25 (1949).
Hjelmfelt et al, Pattern-Recognition in Coupled Chemical Kinetic Systems, Science, 260(5106):335-337 (1993).
Ho, S.N. et al., Site-directed mutageneiss by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction, Gene, 77(1):51-9 (1989).
Hoang, Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: mathematical fundamentals and simulation implementations, Toxicol Lett 79(1-3):99-106 (1995).
Hochuli et al., New metal chelate adsorbent selective for proteins and peptides containing neighbouring histidine residues, J Chromatogr 411: 177-84 (1987).
Holmes et al., Reagents for Combinatorial Organic Synthesis: Development of a New O-Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Linder for Solid Phase Synthesis, J. OrgChem., 60: 2318-2319(1995).
Hong, S.B. et al., Stereochemical constraints on the substrate specificity of phosphodiesterase, Biochemistry, 38: 1159-1165 (1999).
Hoogenboom et al., Multi-subunit proteins on the surface of filamentous phage: methodologies for displaying antibody (Fab) heavy and light chains, Nucl Acids Res., 91: 4133-4137 (1991).
Hoogenboom, H.R., Designing and optimizing library selection strategies for generating high-affinity antibodies, Trends Biotechnol, 15:62-70 (1997).
Hopfinger & Lasheras, Explosive Breakup of a Liquid Jet by a Swirling Coaxial Jet, Physics of Fluids 8(7):1696-1700 (1996).
Hopman et al., Rapid synthesis of biotin-, digoxigenin-, trinitrophenyl-, and fluorochrome-labeled tyramides and their application for In situ hybridization using CARD amplification, J of Histochem and Cytochem, 46(6):771-77 (1998).
Horton et al., Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension, Gene 77(1), 61-8 (1989).
Hosokawa, Kazuo et al., Handling of Picoliter Liquid Samples in a Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-Based Microfluidic Device, Analytical Chemistry, 71(20):4781-4785 (1999).
Hsu et al., Comparison of process parameters for microencapsulation of plasmid DNA in poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres, J Drug Target, 7:313-23 (1999).
Huang L. R. et al., Continuous particle separation through deterministic lateral displacement, Science 304(5673):987-990 (2004).
Huang, Z. et al., A sensitive competitive ELISA for 2,4-dinitrophenol using 3,6-fluorescein diphosphate as a fluorogenic substrate, J Immunol Meth, 149:261 (1992).
Huang, Z.J., Kinetic assay of fluorescein mono-beta-D-galactosidase hydrolysis by beta-galactosidase: a front-face measurement for strongly absorbing fluorogenic substrates, Biochemistry, 30:8530-4 (1991).
Hubert et al. Data Concordance from a Comparison between Filter Binding and Fluorescence Polarization Assay Formats for Identification of RUOCK-II Inhibitors, J biomol Screen 8(4):399-409 (2003).
Huebner, A. et al., Quantitative detection of protein expression in single cells using droplet microfluidics, Chem Com 12:1218-1220 (2007).
Hung et al., Optimization of Droplet Generation by controlling PDMS Surface Hydrophobicity, 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congrees and RD&D Expo, Nov. 13-19, Anaheim, CA (2004).
Hung, et al, Controlled Droplet Fusion in Microfluidic Devices, MicroTAS Sep. 26-30, 2004, Malmo, Sweden (2004).
Hutchison et al., Cell-free cloning using Phi29 polymerase, PNAS 102(48):17332-17336 (2005).
Ibrahim, S.F. et al., High-speed cell sorting: fundamentals and recent advances, Curr Opin Biotchnol, 14(1):5-12 (2003).
Ikeda et al., Bioactivation of tegafur to 5-fluorouracil is catalyzed by cytochrome P-450 2A6 in human liver microsomes in vitro, Clin Cancer Res 6(11):4409-4415 (2000).
Inai et al., Immunohistochemical detection of an enamel protein-related epitope in rat bone at an early stage of osteogenesis, Histochemistry 99(5):335-362 (1993).
International Preliminary Report of Patentability for PCTUS2010061741 dated Sep. 16, 2011(4 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 20, 2007, for PCT/US2006/007772.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/050931 dated Nov. 26, 2009 (3 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS1154353 dated Apr. 20, 2012 (34 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS12024745 dated May 11, 2012 (21 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS1224741 dated Jun. 12, 2012 (12 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS125499 dated May 29, 2012 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/EP2010/065188 dated Jan. 12, 2011 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US11/24615 dated Jul. 25, 2011 (37 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2004/010903 dated Dec. 20, 2004 (16 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2006/021286 dated Sep. 14, 2007 (16 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2007/002063 dated Nov. 15, 2007 (20 pages).
International Search Report in PCT/US01/18400 dated Jan. 28, 2005 ( 37 pages).
Ismagilov, Integrated Microfluidic Systems, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 42:4130-4132 (2003).
Jang et al., Controllable delivery of non-viral DNA from porous scaffold, J Controlled Release 86(1):157-168 (2003).
Japanese Office Action for JP 2006-509830 dated Jun. 1, 2011 (4 pages).
Jermutus et al., Recent advances in producing and selecting functional proteins by using cell-free translation, Curr Opin Biotechnol 9(5): 534-48 (1998).
Jo, et al, Encapsulation of Bovine Serum Albumin in Temperature-Programmed Shell-in-Shell Structures, Macromol. Rapid Comm 24:957-962 (2003).
Joerger et al., Analyte detection with DNA-labeled antibodies and polymerase chain reaction, Clin. Chem. 41(9):1371-7 (1995).
Johannsson et al., Amplification by Second Enzymes, In ELISA and Other Solid Phase Immunoassays, Kemeny et al (ed.), Chapter 4, pp. 85-106 John Wiley (1988).
Johannsson, A., Heterogeneous Enzyme Immunoassays, In Principles and Practice of Immunoassay, pp. 295-325 Stockton Press (1991).
Johnson, T.O. et al., Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors for diabetes, Nature Review Drug Discovery 1, 696-709 (2002).
Jones et al. Glowing jellyfish, luminescence and a molecule called coelenterazine, Trends Biotechnol. 17(12):477-81 (1999).
Jones, L.J. et al., Quenched BODIPY dye-labeled casein substrates for the assay of protease activity by direct fluorescence measurement, Anal Biochem, 251:144 (1997).
Joo et al., Laboratory evolution of peroxide-mediated cytochrome P450 hydroxylaion, Nature 399:670 (1999).
Joos et al., Covalent attachment of hybridizable oligonucleotides to glass supports, Analytical Biochemistry 247:96-101 (1997).
Kadir and Moore, Haem binding to horse spleen ferritin, Febs Lett, 276: 81-4 (1990).
Kallen, R.G. et al., The mechanism of the condensation of formaldehyde with tetrahydrofolic acid, J. Biol. Chem., 241:5851-63 (1966).
Kambara et al., Optimization of Parameters in a DNA Sequenator Using Fluorescence Detection, Nature Biotechnology 6:816-821 (1988).
Kamensky et al., Spectrophotometer: new instrument for ultrarapid cell analysis, Science 150(3696):630-631 (1965).
Kanouni et al., Preparation of a stable double emulsion (W1/0/W2): role of the interfacial films on the stability of the system, Adv. Collid. lnterf. Sci., 99(3): 229-254 (2002).
Katanaev et al., Viral Q beta RNA as a high expression vector for mRNA translation in a cell-free system, Febs Lett, 359:89-92 (1995).
Katsura et al., Indirect micromanipulation of single molecules in water-in-oil emulsion, Electrophoresis, 22:289-93 (2001).
Kawakatsu et al., Regular-sized cell creation in microchannel emulsification by visual microprocessing method, Journal of the American Oil ChemistS Society, 74:317-21 (1997).
Keana J. & Cai, S. X., New reagents for photoaffinity labeling: synthesis and photolysis of functionalized perfluorophenyl azides, J. Org. Chem.55(11):3640-3647 (1990).
Keefe, A.D. et al., Functional proteins from a random-sequence library, Nature, 410: 715-718 (2001).
Keij et al., High-Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using a Frequency-Doubled Argon Ion Laser, Cytometry, 19(3): 209-216 (1995).
Keij, J.F., et al., High-speed photodamage cell sorting: An evaluation of the ZAPPER prototype, Methods in cell biology, 42: 371-358 (1994).
Kelly et al., Miniaturizing chemistry and biology in microdroplets, Chem Commun 18:1773-1788 (2007).
Kerker, M., Elastic and inelastic light scattering in flow cytometry, Cytometry, 4:1-10 (1983).
Khandjian, UV crosslinking of RNA to nylon membrane enhances hybridization signals, Mol. Bio. Rep. 11: 107-115 (1986).
Kim et al., Comparative study on sustained release of human growth hormone from semi-crystalline poly(L-lactic acid) and amorphous poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres: morphological effect on protein release, Journal of Controlled Release, 98(1):115-125 (2004).
Kim S. et al, Type II quantum dots: CdTe/CdSe (core/shell) and CdSe/ZnTe (core/shell) heterostructures, J. Am Chem Soc. 125:11466-11467 (2003).
Kircher et al., High-throughput DNA sequencing-concepts and limitations, Bioessays 32(6):524-536 (2010).
Kiss et al., High-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction in picoliter droplets, Anal. Chem 80:8975-8981 (2008).
Kitagawa et al., Manipulation of a single cell with microcapillary tubing based on its electrophoretic mobility, Electrophoresis 16:1364-1368 (1995).
Klug and Famulok, All you wanted to know about selex, Molecular Biology Reports, 20:97-107 (1994).
Klug and Schwabe, Protein motifs 5. Zinc fingers, FASEB J 9(8):597-604 (1995).
Klug, A., Gene Regulatory Proteins and Their Interaction with DNA, Ann NY Acad Sci, 758: 143-60 (1995).
Knaak et al., Development of partition coefficients, Vmax and Km values, and allometric relationships, Toxicol Lett. 79(I-3):87-98 (1995).
Knight, James B., Hydrodynamic Focusing on a Silicon Chip: Mixing Nanoliters in Microseconds, Physical Review Lett 80(17):3863-3866 (1998).
Kojima et al. PCR amplification from single DNA molecules on magnetic beads in emulsion: application for high-throughput screening of transcription factor targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e150 (2005).
Kolb et al., Cotranslational folding of proteins, Biochem Cell Biol, 73:1217-20 (1995).
Komatsu et al., Roles of cytochromes P450 1A2, 2A6, and 2C8 in 5-fluorouracil formation rom tegafur, an anticancer prodrug, in human liver microsomes. Drug Met. Disp., 28:1457-1463 (2001).
Kopp et al., Chemical amplification: continuous flow PCR on a chip, Science, 280:1046-48 (1998).
Koster et al., Drop-based microfluidic devices for encapsulation of single cells, Lab on a Chip 8:1110-1115 (2008).
Kowalczykowski et al., Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli, Microbiol Rev 58(3):401-65 (1994).
Krafft et al., Emulsions and microemulsions with a fluorocarbon phase, Colloid and Interface Science 8(3):251-258 (2003).
Krafft, Fluorocarbons and fluorinated amphiphiles in drug delivery and biomedical research, Adv Rev Drug Disc 47:209-228 (2001).
Krafft et al., Synthesis and preliminary data on the biocompatibility and emulsifying properties of perfluoroalkylated phosphoramidates as injectable surfactants, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 26:545-550 (1991).
Kralj et al., Surfactant-enhanced liquid-liquid extraction in microfluidic channels with inline electric-field enhanced coalescence, Lab Chip 5:531-535 (2005).
Kricka and Wilding, Microchip PCR, Anal Bioanal Chem 377(5):820-825 (2003).
Kricka and Wilding, Micromachining: a new direction for clinical analyzers, Pure and Applied Chemistry 68(10):1831-1836 (1996).
Krumdiek, C.L. et al., Solid-phase synthesis of pteroylpolyglutamates, Methods Enzymol, 524-29 (1980).
Kumar, A. et al., Activity and kinetic characteristics of glutathione reductase in vitro in reverse micellar waterpool, Biochem Biophys Acta, 996(1-2):1-6 (1989).
Lage et al., Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH. Genome Res. 13: 294-307 (2003).
Lamprecht et al., pH-sensitive microsphere delivery increases oral bioavailability of calcitonin, Journal of Controlled Release, 98(1): 1-9(2004).
Lancet, D. et al., Probability model for molecular recognition in biuological receptor repertoirs: significance to the olfactory system, PNAS, 90(8):3715-9 (1993).
Landergren et al., A ligase mediated gene detection technique. Science 241(4869):1077-80 (1988).
Lasheras, et al., Breakup and Atomization of a Round Water Jet by a High Speed Annular Air Jet, J Fluid Mechanics 357:351-379 (1998).
Leary et al., Application of Advanced Cytometric and Molecular Technologies to Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring, Proceedings of SPIE 3913:36-44 (2000).
Lee et al, Investigating the target recognition of DNA cytosine-5 methyltransferase Hhal by library selection using in vitro compartmentalisation (IVC), Nucleic Acids Res 30:4937-4944 (2002).
Lee et al., Circulating flows inside a drop under time-periodic non-uniform electric fields, Phys Fuilds 12(8):1899-1910 (2000).
Lee, et al, Effective Formation of Silicone-in-Fluorocarbon-in-Water Double Emulsions: Studies on Droplet Morphology and Stability, Journal of Dispersion Sci Tech 23(4):491-497(2002).
Lee, et al, Preparation of Silica Paticles Encapsulating Retinol Using O/W/O Multiple Emulsions, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 240(1): 83-89 (2001).
Lemof, et al, An AC Magnetohydrodynamic Microfluidic Switch for Micro Total Analysis Systems, Biomedical Microdevices, 5(I):55-60 (2003).
Lesley et al., Use of in vitro protein synthesis from PCR-generated templates to study interaction of E coli transcription factors with core RNA polymerase, J Biol Chem 266(4):2632-8 (1991).
Lesley, S.A., Preparation and use of E. coli S-30 extracts, Methods Mol Biol, 37:265-78 (1995).
Leung et al., A method for random mutagenesis of a defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction. Technique 1:11-15 (1989).
Li and Harrison, Transport, Manipulation, and Reaction of Biological Cells On-Chip Using Electrokinetic Effects, Analytical Chemistry 69(8):1564-1568 (1997).
Li et al., Nanoliter microfluidic hybrid method for simultaneous screening and optimization validated with crystallization of membrane proteins, PNAS 103: 19243-19248 (2006).
Li et al., Single-step procedure for labeling DNA strand breaks with fllourescein-or BODIPY-conjugated deoxynucleotides: detection of apoptosis and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. Cytometry 20:172-180 (1995).
Liao et al., Isolation of a thermostable enzyme variant by cloning and selection in a thermophile, PNAS 83:576-80 (1986).
Lim et al., Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas, Science 210(4472):908-10 (1980).
Link et al, Geometrically Mediated Breakup of Drops in Microfluidic Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(5): 054503-1 thru 054503-4 (2004).
Lipinski et al., Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings ,Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 46:3-26 (2001).
Lipkin et al., Biomarkers of increased susceptibility to gastreointestinal cancer: new application to studies of cancer prevention in human subjects, Cancer Research 48:235-245 (1988).
Liu et al., Fabrication and characterization of hydrogel-based microvalves, Mecoelectromech. Syst.11:45-53 (2002).
Liu et al., Passive Mixing in a Three-Dimensional Serpentine MicroChannel, J MEMS 9(2):190-197 (2000).
Lizardi et al., Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet 19(3):225-32 (1998).
Loakes and Brown, 5-Nitroindole as a universal base analogue. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4039-4043 (1994).
Loakes et al., Stability and structure of DNA oligonucleotides containing non-specific base analogues. J. Mol. Biol 270:426-435 (1997).
Loeker et al., Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 214:143-150, (2003).
Lopez-Herrera, et al, Coaxial jets generated from electrified Taylor cones. Scaling laws, Aerosol Science, 34:535-552 (2003).
Lopez-Herrera, et al, One-Dimensional Simulation of the Breakup of Capillary Jets of Conducting Liquids Application to E.H.D. Spraying, Aerosol. Set, 30 (7): 895-912 (1999).
Lopez-Herrera, et al, The electrospraying of viscous and non-viscous semi-insulating liquids. Scalilng laws, Bulletin of the American Physical Society,40 (12):2041(1995).
Lorenceau et al, Generation of Polymerosomes from Double-Emulsions, Langmuir, 21(20): 9183-9186 (2005).
Lorenz et al, Isolation and expression of a cDNA encoding Renilla reniformis luciferase, PNAS 88(10):4438-42 (1991).
Loscertales, et al, Micro/Nano Encapsulation via Electrified Coaxial Liquid Jets, Science, 295(5560): 1695-1698 (2002).
Low N.M. et al., Mimicking somatic hypermutaion: affinity maturation of antibodies displayed on bacteriophage using a bacterila mutator strain. J Mol Biol 260(3), 359-68 (1996).
Lowe, K.C., Perfluorochemical respiratory gas carriers: benefits to cell culture systems, J Fluorine Chem 118:19-26 (2002).
Lowman et al., Selecting high affinity binding proteins by monovalent phage display, Biochemistry 30(45):10832-8 (1991).
Lu et al., Robust fluorescein-doped silica nanoparticles via dense-liquid treatment, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicachemical and Engineering Aspects, 303(3):207-210 (2007).
Luisi et al, Activity and Conformation of Enzymes in Reverse Micellar Solutions, Meth. Enzymol 136:188-216 (1987).
Lund et al., Assesment of methods for covalent binding of nucleic acids to magnetic beads, Dynabeads, and the characteristics of the bound nucleic acids in hybridization reactions, Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press, 16(22) (1998).
Lunderberg et al., Solid-phase technology: magnetic beads to improve nucleic acid detection and analysis, Biotechnology Annual Review, 1:373-401 (1995).
Lundstrom, et al, Breakthrough in cancer therapy: Encapsulation of drugs and viruses, www.currentdrugdiscovery.com, Nov. 19-23, 2002.
Lyne, P.D., Structure-Based Virtual Screening: An Overview, Drug Discov. Today, 7(20):1047-1055 (2002).
Ma, C. et al., In vitro protein engineering using synthetic tRNA(Ala) with different anticodons, Biochemistry 32(31):7939-45 (1993).
Mackenzie et al., The application of flow microfluorimetry to biomedical research and diagnosis: a review, Dev Biol Stand 64:181-193 (1986).
Maclean, D. et al., Glossary of terms used in combinatorial chemistry, Pure Appl. Chem. 71(12):2349-2365 (1999).
Magdassi et al., Multiple Emulsions: HLB Shift Caused by Emulsifier Migration to External Interface, J. Colloid Interface Sci 97:374-379 (1984).
Mahajan et al., Bcl-2 and Bax Interactions in Mitochondria Probed with Green Florescent Protein and Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Nat. Biotechnol. 16(6): 547-552 (1998).
Manley et al., In vitro transcription: whole cell extract, Methods Enzymol, 101:568-82 (1983).
Manz et al., Micromachining of monocrystalline silicon and glass for chemical analysis systems a look into next century's technology or just a fashionable craze, Trends in Analytical Chemistry 10(5):144-149 (1991).
Mao et al., Kinetic behaviour of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles: a stopped-flow study, Eur J Biochem 208(1):165-70 (1992).
Mao, Q. et al., Substrate effects on the enzymatic activity of alphachymotrypsin in reverse micelles, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 178(3):1105-12 (1991).
Mardis, E.R., The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics, Trends Genet 24:133-141 (2008).
Margulies, M et al., Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors, Nature 437(7057):376-380 (2005).
Marques et al., Porous Flow within Concentric Cylinders, Bull Am Phys Soc Div Fluid Dyn 41:1768 (1996).
Mason, T.J. and Bibette, J. Shear Rupturing of Droplets in Complex Fluids, Langmuir, 13(17):4600-4613 (1997).
Mastrobattista et al., High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries: in vitro evolution of a beta-galactosidase by fluorescence-activated sorting of double emulsions, Chem. Biol. 12(12): 1291-1300 (2005).
Masui et ai., Probing of DNA-Binding Sites of Escherichia coli RecA Protein Utilizing 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-Sulfonic Acid, Biochem 37(35):12133-12143 (1998).
Matayoshi, E.D. et al., Novel fluorogenic substrates for assaying retroviral proteases by resonance energy transfer, Science 247:954 (1990).
Mayr, L.M., and Fuerst, P., The Future of High-Throughput Screening, JBiomol Screen 13:443-448 (2008).
Mazutis et al., Droplet-Based Microfluidic Systems for High-Throughput Single DNA Molecule Isothermal Amplification and Analysis, Anal Chem 81(12):4813-4821 (2009).
Mazutis et al., Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme, Lab Chip 9:2902-2908 (2009).
McDonald and Whitesides, Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices, Account Chem. Res. 35:491-499 (2002).
McDonald et al. Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane), Electrophoresis 21(1):27-40 (2000).
Melton et al., Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter, Nucl. Acids Res. 12(18):7035-7056 (1984).
Mendel, D. et al., Site-Directed Mutagenesis with an Expanded Genetic Code, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 24:435-62 (1995).
Menger and Yamada, Enzyme catalysis in water pools, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101:6731-4 (1979).
Meylan and Howard, Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients, J Pharm Sci. 84(1):83-92 (1995).
Miele et al., Autocatalytic replication of a recombinant RNA, J Mol Biol, 171:281-95 (1983).
Minshuil, J. and Stemmer, W.P., Protein evolution by molecular breeding, Curr Opin Chem Biol 3(3): 284-90 (1999).
Miroux and Walker, Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels, J of Mol Biol 260(3):289-98 (1996).
Miyawaki et at., Fluorescent Indicators for Ca2+ Based on Green Fluorescent Proteins and Calmodulin, Nature, 388: 882-887 (1997).
Mize et al., Dual-enzyme cascade—an amplified method for the detection of alkaline phosphatase, Anal Biochem 179(2): 229-35 (1989).
Mock et al., A fluorometric assay for the biotin-avidin interaction based on displacement of the fluorescent probe 2-anilinonaphthalene-6-sulfonic acid, Anal Biochem, 151:178-81 (1985).
Moldavan, A., Photo-electric technique for the counting of microscopical cells, Science 80:188-189 (1934).
Montigiani, S. et al., Alanine substitutions in calmodulin-binding peptides result in unexpected affinity enhancement, J Mol Biol, 258:6-13 (1996).
Moore, M.J., Exploration by lamp light, Nature, 374:766-7 (1995).
Moudrianakis and Beer, Base sequence determination in nucelic acids with the electron microscope 3. Chemistry and microscopy of guanine-labeled DNA, PNAS 53:564-71 (1965).
Mueth et al., Origin of stratification in creaming emulsions, Physical Review Letters 77(3):578-581 (1996).
Mulbry, W.W. et al., Parathion hydrolase specified by the Flavobacterium opd gene: relationshio between the gene and protein. J Bacteriol, 171: 6740-6746 (1989).
Mulder et al., Characterization of two human monoclonal antibodies reactive with HLA-B12 and HLA-B60, respectively, raised by in vitro secondary immunization of peripheral blood lymphocytes, Hum. Immunol 36(3):186-192 (1993).
Nakano et al., High speed polymerase chain reaction in constant flow, Biosci Biotech and Biochem, 58:349-52 (1994).
Nakano et al., Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion, J Biotech, 102:117-24 (2003).
Nakano et al., Single-molecule reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using water-in-oil emulsion, J Biosci Bioeng 99:293-295 (2005).
Nametkin, S.N. et al., Cell-free translation in reversed micelles, FEB Letters, 309(3):330-32 (1992).
Narang et al, Improved phosphotriester method for the synthesis of gene fragments, Methods Enzymol, 68:90-98 (1979).
Nelson, P. S., et al., Bifunctional oligonucleotide probes synthesized using a novel CPG support are able to detect single base pair mutations, Nucl Acids Res 17(18): 7187-7194 (1989).
Ness, J.E. et al., Molecular Breeding: the natural approach to protein design. Adv Protein Chem, 55: 261-292 (2000).
Ng et al., Protein crystallization by capillary counter-diffusion for applied crystallographic structure determination, J. Struct. Biol, 142:218-231(2003).
Ng, B.L. et al., Factors affecting flow karyotype resolution, Cytometry, Part A 69A: 1028-1036 (2006).
Nguyen et al., Optical detection for droplet size control in microfluidic droplet-based analysis systems, Sensors and Actuators B 117(2):431-436 (2006).
Nihant et al., Polylactide Microparticles Prepared by Double Emulsion/Evaporation Technique. I. Effect of Primary Emulsion Stability, Pharmaceutical Research, 11(10):1479-1484 (1994).
Nisisako et al., Controlled formulation of monodisperse double emulsions in a multiple-phase microluidic system, Sot Matter, 1:23-27 (2005).
Nisisako et al., Formation of droplets using branch channels in a microfluidic circuit, Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. International Session Papers,1262-1264 (2002).
Nisisako et al., Microstructured Devices for Preparing Controlled Multiple Emulsions. Chem. Eng. Technol 31(8):1091-1098 (2008).
Nisisako, Takasi et al., Droplet Formation in a MicroChannel NetWO rk, Lab on a Chip, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 24-26.
Nissim, A. et al., Antibody fragments from a single pot phage display library as immunochemical reagents, Embo J, 13:692-8 (1994).
Nof and Shea, Drug-releasing scaffolds fabricated from drug-loaded microspheres, J. Biomed Mater Res 59:349-356 (2002).
Norman, A., Flow Cytometry, Med. Phys., 7(6):609-615 (1980).
Oberholzer et al., Enzymatic RNA replication in self-reproducing vesicles: an approach to a minimal cell, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 207(1):250-7 (1995).
Oberholzer et al., Polymerase chain reaction in liposomes, Chem. Biol. 2(10):677-82 (1995).
Obukowicz, M.G. et al., Secretion and export of IGF-1 in Escerichia coli strain JM101, Mol Gen Genet, 215:19-25 (1988).
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,911 dated Feb. 8, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,845 dated Apr. 26, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,845 dated Aug. 4, 2010.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/698,298, dated Jun. 29, 2011.
Ogura, Y., Catalase activity at high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, Archs Biochem Biophys, 57: 288-300 (1955).
Oh et al., Distribution of Macropores in Silica Particles Prepared by Using Multiple Emulsions, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 254(1): 79-86 (2002).
Okushima et al. Controlled production of monodisperse double emulsions by two-step droplet breakup in microfluidic devices, Langmuir 20(23): 9905-8 (2004).
Olsen et ai., Function-based isolation of novel enzymes from a large library, Nat Bioteoltnol 13(10):1071-4 (2000).
Omburo, G.A. et al., Characterization of the zinc binding site of bacterial phosphotriesterase, J of Biological Chem, 267:13278-83 (1992).
Oroskar et al., Detection of immobilized amplicons by ELISA-like techniques, Clin. Chem. 42:1547-1555 (1996).
Ostermeier, M. et al., A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology, Nat Biotechnol, 17(12):1205-9 (1999).
Ouelette, A new wave of microfluidic devices, Indust Physicist pp. 14-17 (2003).
Pabit et al., Laminar-Flow Fluid Mixer for Fast Fluorescence Kinetics Studies, Biophys J 83:2872-2878 (2002).
Paddison et al., Stable suppression of gene expression by RNAi in mammalian cells, PNAS 99(3):1443-1448 (2002).
Pannacci et al., Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium States in Microluidic Double Emulsions Physical Review Leters, 101(16):164502 (2008).
Park et al., Cylindrical compact thermal-cycling device for continuoflow polymeras chain reaction, Anal Chem, ACS, 75:6029-33 (2003).
Park et al., Model of Formation of Monodispersed Colloids, J. Phys. Chem. B 105:11630-11635 (2001).
Parker et al., Development of high throughput screening assays using fluorescence polarization: nuclear receptor-ligand-binding and kinase/phosphatase assays, J Biomol Screen, 5(2): 77-88 (2000).
Pelham and Jackson, An efficient mRNA-dependent translation system from reticulocyte lysates, Eur J Biochem 67:247-56 (1976).
Pelletier et al., An in vivo library-verslibrary selection of optimized protein-protein interactions, Nature Biotechnology, 17:683-90 (1999).
Peng et al., Controlled Production of Emulsions Using a Crossflow Membrane, Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 15:21-25 (1998).
Perelson et al., Theorectical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and relaibility of self-non-self discrimination. J Theor Biol 81(4):645-70 (1979).
Perez-Gilabert et al., Application of active-phase plot to the kinetic analysis of lipoxygenase in reverse micelles, Biochemistry J. 288:1011-1015 (1992).
Perrin, J., Polarisation de la lumiere de fluorescence vie moyenne des molecules dans letat excite, J. Phys. Rad. 1:390-401 (1926).
Petrounia, I.P. et al., Designed evolution of enzymatic properties, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 11:325-330 (2000).
Piemi et al., Transdermal delivery of glucose through hairless rat skin in vitro: effect of multiple and simple emulsions, Int J Pharm, 171:207-215 (1998).
Pirrung et al., A General Method for the Spatially Defined Immobilization of Biomolecules on Glass Surfaces Using ‘Caged’ Biotin, Bioconjug Chem 7: 317-321 (1996).
Ploem, in Fluorescent and Luminescent Probes for Biological Activity Mason, T. G. Ed., Academic Press, Landon, pp. 1-11, 1993.
Pluckthun, A. et al., In vitro selection and evolution of proteins, Adv Protein Chem, 55: 367-403 (2000).
Pollack et al., Electrowetting-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics, Lab Chip 2:96-101 (2002).
Pollack et al., Selective chemical catalysis by an antibody, Science 234(4783):1570-3 (1986).
Pons et al, Synthesis of Near-Infrared-Emitting, Water-Soluble CdTeSe/CdZnS Core/Shell Quantum Dots, Chemistry of Materials 21(8):1418-1424 (2009).
Posner et al., Engineering specificity for folate into dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli, Biochemistry, 35: 1653-63 (1996).
Poulin and Theil, “A priori” prediction of tissue: plasma partition coefficients of drugs to facilitate the use of physiologically-based pharmokinetic models in drug discovery, J Pharm Sci 89(1):16-35 (2000).
Priest, et al. Generation of Monodisperse Gel Emulsions in a Microfluidic Device, Applied Physics Letters, 88:024106 (2006).
Qi et al., Acid Beta-Glucosidase: Intrinsic Fluorescence and Conformational Changes Induced by Phospholipids and Saposin C, Biochem., 37(33): 11544-11554 (1998).
Raghuraman et al., Emulston Liquid Membranes for Wastewater Treatment: Equillibrium Models for Some Typical Metal-Extractant Systems,Environ. Sci. Technol 28:1090-1098 (1994).
Ralhan, Discovery and Verification of Head-and-neck Cancer Biomarkers by Differential Protein Expression Analysis Using iTRAQ Labeling, Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography, and Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Mol Cell Proteomics 7(6):1162-1173 (2008).
Ramsey, J.M., The burgeoning power of the shrinking laboratory, Nat Biotechnol 17(11):1061-2 (1999).
Ramstrom and Lehn, Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries, Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:26-36 (2002).
Raushel, F.M. et al., Phosphotriesterase: an enzyme in search of its natural substrate, Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol, 74: 51-93 (2000).
Rech et al., Introduction of a yeast artificial chromosome vector into Sarrachomyeces cervesia by electroporation, Nucleic Acids Res 18:1313 (1990).
Reyes et al., Micro Total Analysis Systems. 1. Introduction, Theory and Technology, Anal Chem 74(12):2623-2636 (2002).
Riess, J.S., Fluorous micro- and nanophases with a biomedical perspective, Tetrahedron 58(20):4113-4131 (2002).
Roach et al., Controlling nonspecific protein adsorption in a plug-based microfluidic system by controlling inteifacial chemistry using fluorophase surfactants, Anal. Chem. 77:785-796 (2005).
Roberts & Ja, In vitro selection of nucleic acids and proteins: What are we learning, Curr Opin Struct Biol 9(4): 521-9 (1999).
Roberts et al., Simian virus 40 DNA directs synthesis of authentic viral polypeptides in a linked transcription-translation cell-free system 72(5):1922-1926 (1975).
Roberts, J.W.,Termination factor for RNA synthesis, Nature, 224: 1168-74 (1969).
Roberts, R.W. Totally in vitro protein selection using mRNA-protein fusions and ribosome display. Curr Opin Chem Biol 3(3), 268-73 (1999).
Rodriguez-Antona et al., Quantitative RT-PCR measurement of human cytochrome P-450s: application to drug induction studies. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 376:109-116 (2000).
Rolland et al., Fluorescence Polarization Assay by Flow Cytometry, J. Immunol. Meth., 76(1): 1-10 (1985).
Rosenberg et al.,Termination of transcription in bacteriophage lambda, J Biol Chem, 250: 4755-64 (1975).
Rosenberry, T.L., Acetylcholinesterase, Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol, 43: 103-218 (1975).
Rotman, Measurement of activities of single molecules of beta-galactosidase, PNAS, 47:1981-91 (1961).
Russon et al., Single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis by allele-specific extension of fluorescently labeled nucleotides in a microfluidic flow-through device, Electrophoresis, 24:158-61 (2003).
Sadtler et al., Achieving stable, reverse water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Angew Chem Int Ed 35:1976-1978 (1996).
Saiki, R.K, et al, Primer directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239(4839):487-91 (1988).
Sakamoto, Rapid and simple quantification of bacterial cells by using a microfluidic device, Appl Env Microb. 71:2 (2005).
Sanchez et al., Breakup of Charged Capillary Jets, Bulletin of the American Physical Society Division of Fluid Dynamics 41:1768-1768 (1996).
Sano, T. et al., Immuno-PCR—Very sensitive antigen-detection by means of sepcific antibody-DNA conjugates. Science 258(5079), 120-122 (1992).
SantaLucia, A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics, PNAS 95(4):1460-5 (1998).
Santra et al., Fluorescence lifetime measurements to determine the core-shell nanostructure of FITC-doped silica nanoparticles: An optical approach to evaluate nanoparticle photostability, J Luminescence 117(1):75-82 (2006).
Schatz et al., Screening of peptide libraries linked to lac repressor, Methods Enzymol 267: 171-91 (1996).
Schneegass et al., Miniaturized flow-through PCR with different template types in a silicone chip thermocycler, Lab on a Chip, Royal Soc of Chem, 1:42-9 (2001).
Schubert et al., Designer Capsules, Nat Med 8:1362 (2002).
Schweitzer et al., Immunoassays with rolling circle DNA amplification: A versatile platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection, PNAS 97(18), 10113-10119 (2000).
Schweitzer, B. et al., Combining nucleic acid amplification and detection. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(1):21-7 (2001).
Scott, R.L., The Solubility of Fluorocarbons, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 70: 4090-4093 (1948).
Seethala and Menzel, Homogeneous, Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Src-Family Tyrosine Kinases, Anal Biochem 253(2):210-218 (1997).
Seiler et al., Planar glass chips for capillary electrophoresis: repetitive sample injection, quantitation, and separation efficiency, Anal Chem 65(10):1481-1488 (1993).
Selwyn M. J., A simple test for inactivation of an enzyme during assay, Biochim Biophys Acta 105:193-195 (1965).
Seo et al., Microfluidic consecutive flow-focusing droplet generators, Soft Matter, 3:986-992 (2007).
Seong and Crooks, Efficient Mixing and Reactions Within Microfluidic Channels Using Microbead-Supported Catalysts, J Am Chem Soc 124(45):13360-1 (2002).
Seong et al., Fabrication of Microchambers Defined by Photopolymerized Hydrogels and Weirs Within Microfluidic Systems: Application to DNA Hybridization, Analytical Chem 74(14):3372-3377 (2002).
Sepp et al., Microbead display by in vitro compartmentalisation: selection for binding using flow cytometry, FEBS Letters 532:455-58 (2002).
Serpersu et al., Reversible and irreversible modification of erythrocyte membranse permeability by electric field, Biochim Biophys Acta 812(3):779-785 (1985).
Shapiro, H.M., Multistation multiparameter flow cytometry: a critical review and rationale, Cytometry 3: 227-243 (1983).
Shestopalov et al., Multi-Step Synthesis of Nanoparticles Performed on Millisecond Time Scale in a Microfluidic Droplet-Based System, The Royal Society of Chemistry 4:316-321(2004).
Shtern V, and Hussain F., Hysteresis in swirling jets, J. Fluid Mech. 309:1-44 (1996).
Sia &Whitesides, Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies, Electrophoresis 24(21):3563-3576 (2003).
Sidhu, S.S., Phage display in pharmaceutical biotechnology, Curr Opin Biotech 11:610-616 (2000).
Siemering et al., Mutations that suppress the thermosensitivity of green fluorescent protein, Current Biology 6:1653-1663 (1996).
Silva-Cunha et al., W/O/W multiple emulsions of insulin containing a protease inhibitor and an absorption enhancer: biological activity after oral administration to normal and diabetic rats, Int J Pharm 169:33-44 (1998).
Sims et al., Immunopolymerase chain reaction using real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection, Anal. Biochem. 281(2):230-2 (2000).
Slappendel et al., Normal cations and abnormal membrane lipids in the red blood cells of dogs with familial stomatocytosis hypertrophic gastritis, Blood 84:904-909 (1994).
Slob et al., Structural identifiability of PBPK models: practical consequences for modeling strategies and study designs, Crit Rev Toxicol. 27(3):261-72 (1997).
Smith et al., Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads, Science 258(5085):1122-1126 (1992).
Smith et al., Fluorescence detection in automated DNA sequence analysis, Nature 321 :674-679 (1986).
Smith et al., Phage display, Chemical Reviews 97(2), 391-410 (1997).
Smith et al., The synthesis of oligonucleotides containing an aliphatic amino group at the 5′ terminus: synthesis of fluorescent DNA primers for use in DNA sequence analysis, Nucl. Acid Res. 13:2399-2412 (1985).
Smith G.P., Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface, Science 228(4705): 1315-7(1985).
Smyth et al., Markers of apoptosis: methods for elucidating the mechanism of apoptotic cell death from the nervous system, Biotechniques 32:648-665 (2000).
Sohn, et al, Capacitance cytometry: Measuring biological cells one by one, PNAS 97(20):10687-10690 (2000).
Somasundaram and Ramalingam, Gain studies of Rhodamine 6G dye doped polymer laser, J Photochem Photobiol 125(1-3):93-98 (1999).
Song et al., A microfluidic system for controlling reaction networks in time, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42(7):768-772 (2003).
Song et al., Experimental Test of Scaling of Mixing by Chaotic Advection in Droplets Moving Through Microfluidic Channels, App Phy Lett 83(22):4664-4666 (2003).
Song, H. and Ismagilov, R.F., Millisecond kinetics on a microluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents, J Am Chem Soc. 125: 14613-14619 (2003).
Soni and Meller, Progress toward ultrafast DNA sequencing using solid-state nanopores, Clin Chem 53:1996-2001 (2007).
Soumillion et al., Novel concepts for the selection of catalytic activity. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:387-394 (2001).
Sproat et al., The synthesis of protected 5′-mercapto-2′,5′-dideoxyribonucleoside-3′-0-phosphorainidites, uses of 5′-mercapto-oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Res 15:4837-4848 (1987).
Stauber, et a., Rapid generation of monoclonal antibody-secreting hybridomas against African horse sickness virus by in vitro immunization and the fusion/cloning technique, J. Immunol. Meth 161(2):157-168 (1993).
Stemmer, W.P., DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. PNAS 91(22):10747-51(1994).
Stemmer, W.P., Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling, Nature 370(6488):389-91 (1994).
Stober et al., Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range, J Colloid and Interface Sci 26(1):62-69 (1968).
Stofko, H.R. et al., A single step purification for recombinant proteins. Characterization of microtube associated protein (MAP2) fragment which associates with the type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase, Febs Lett 302: 274-278 (1992).
Stone et al., Engineering flows in small devices: Microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36:381-441 (2004).
Stroock et al., Chaotic mixer for microchannels, Science 295(5555):647-651 (2002).
Studer et al., Fluorous Synthesis: A FluoroPhase Strategy for Improving Separation Efficiency in Organic Synthesis, Science 275: 823-826 (1997).
Sugiura et al., Effect of Channel Structure on MicroChannel Emuisification, Langmuir 18:5708-5712 (2002).
Sundberg et al., Spatially-Addressable Immobilisation of Macromolecules on Solid Supports, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 117:12050-12057 (1995).
Sung et al. Chip-based microfluidic devices coupled with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, Electrophoresis 26:1783-1791 (2005).
Suzuki et al., Random mutagenesis of thermus aquaticus DNA polmerase I: concordance of immutable sites in vivo with the crystal structure, PNAS USA, 93:96701-9675 (1996).
Tabatabai and Faghri, A New Two-Phase Flow Map and Transition Boundary Accounting for Surface Tension Effects in Horizontal Miniature and Micro Tubes, J Heat Transfer 123:958-968 (2001).
Tabatabai et al, Economic feasability study of polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF) for water softening, J Membrane Science 100(3):193-207 (1995).
Tabatabai et al., Reducing Surfactant Adsorption on Carbonate Reservoirs, SPE Resenroir Engineering 8(2):117-122 (1993).
Tabatabai, Water Softening Using polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration, Separation Science Technology 30(2):211-224 (1995).
Takayama et al., Patterning Cells and Their Environments Using Multiple Laminar Fluid Flows in Capillary NetWO rks, PNAS 96:5545-5548 (1999).
Takeuchi et al., An Axisymmetric Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device, Adv. Mater 17(8):1067-1072 (2005).
Taly et al., Droplets as Microreactors for High-Throughput Biology, Chembiochem 8(3):263-272 (2007).
Tan et al., Controlled Fission of Droplet Emulsions in Bifurcating Microfluidic Channels, Transducers Boston (2003).
Tan et al., Design of microluidic channel geometries for the control of droplet volume, chemical concentration, and sorting, Lab Chip, 4(4): 292-298 (2004).
Tan et al., Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device, Sensors and Actuators 114:350-356 (2006).
Tan, Y.C., Microfluidic Liposome Generation from Monodisperse Droplet Emulsion—Towards the Realization of Artificial Cells, Summer Bioengineering Conference, Florida (2003).
Tan, Y.C., Monodisperse Droplet Emulsions in Co-Flow Microfluidic Channels, Micro TAS, Lake Tahoe (2003).
Tanaka et al., Ethanol Production from Starch by a Coimmobilized Mixed Culture System of Aspergillus awamori and Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol Bioeng XXVII:1761-1768 (1986).
Tang et al., A multi-color fast-switching microfluidic droplet dye laser, Lab Chip 9:2767-2771 (2009).
Taniguchi et al., Chemical Reactions in Microdroplets by Electrostatic Manipulation of Droplets in Liquid Media, Lab on a Chip 2:19-23 (2002).
Tawfik et al., catELISA: a facile general route to catalytic antibodies, PNAS 90(2):373-7 (1993).
Tawfik et al., Efficient and selective p-nitrophenyl-ester=hydrolyzing antibodies elicited by a p-nitrobenzyl phosphonate hapten, Eur J Biochem, 244:619-26 (1997).
Tawfik et al., Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution, Nature Biotechnology, 7(16):652-56 (1998).
Tawfik, D.S. et al., 1,8-diabycyclo[5.4.0]undecane mediated transesterification of p-nitrophenyl phosphonates—a novel route to phosphono esters, Synthesis—Stuttgart, 10: 968-972 (1993).
Taylor et al., Characterization of chemisorbed monolayers by surface potential measurments, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 24:1443 (1991).
Taylor, The formation of emulsions in definable field of flow, Proc R Soc London A 146(858):501-523 (1934).
Tchagang et al., Early detection of ovarian cancer using group biomarkers, Mol Cancer Ther 7:27-37 (2008).
Tencza et al., Development of a Fluorescence Polarization-Based Diagnostic Assay for Equine Infectious Anemia Virus, J Clinical Microbiol 38(5):1854-185 (2000).
Terray et al., Microfluidic Control Using Colloidal Devices,Science, 296(5574):1841-1844 (2002).
Terray, et al, Fabrication of linear colloidal structures for microfluidic applications, Applied Phys Lett 81(9):1555-1557 (2002).
Tewhey et al., Microdroplet-based PCR amplification for large scale targeted sequencing, Nat Biotechnol 27(11):1025-1031 (2009).
Theberge et al., Microdroplets in Microfluidics: An Evolving Platform for Discoveries in Chemistry and Biology, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 49(34):5846-5868 (2010).
Thompson, L.F., Introduction to Lithography, ACS Symposium Series 219:1-13, (1983).
Thorsen et al., Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device, Phys Rev Lett 86(18):4163-4166 (2001).
Thorsen et al., Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration, Science 298:580-584 (2002).
Tice et al., Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels, Analytica Chimica Acta 507:73-77 (2004).
Tice et al., Formation of droplets and mixing in multiphase microfluidics at low values of the reynolds and the capillary numbers, Langmuir 19:9127-9133 (2003).
Titomanlio et al., Capillary experiments of flow induced crystallization of HOPE, AlChe Journal, 36(1):13-18(1990).
Tleugabulova et al., Evaluating formation and growth mechanisms of silica particles using fluorescence anisotropy decay analysis, Langmuir 20(14):5924-5932 (2004).
Tokatlidis et al., Nascent chains: folding and chaperone intraction during elongation on ribosomes, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 348:89-95 (1995).
Tokeshi et al., ContinuoFlow Chemical Processing on a Microchip by Combining Microunit Operations and a Multiphase Flow NetWO rk, Anal Chem 74(7):1565-1571 (2002).
Tokumitsu, H. et al., Preparation of gadopentetic acid-loaded chitosan microparticles for gadolinium neutron-capture therapy of cancer by a novel emulsion-droplet coalescence technique, Chem and Pharm Bull 47(6):838-842 (1999).
Tramontano, A., Catalytic antibodies, Science 234(4783):1566-70 (1986).
Trindade, T., Nanocrystalline semiconductors: synthesis, properties, and perspectives, Chem. Mat. 13:3843-3858 (2001).
Tripet, B. et al., Engineering a de novo-designed coiled-coil heterodimerization domain off the rapid detection, purification and characterization of recombinantly expressed peptides and proteins, Protein Engng., 9:1029-42 (1996).
Umbanhowar et al., Monodisperse Emulsion Generation via Drop Break Off in a Coflowing Stream, Langmuir 16(2):347-351 (2000).
Unger et al., Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multylayer soft lithography, Science 288(5463):113-116 (2000).
Utada, A. et al., Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device, Science, 308:537-541 (2005).
Vainshtein et al., Peptide rescue of an N-terminal truncation of the stoffel fragment of Taq DNA polymerase, Protein Science, 5:1785-92 (1996).
Van Bockstaele et al., Prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a comprehensive review, Blood Rev 23(1):25-47 (2009).
Van Dilla et al., Cell Microfluorometry: A Method for Rapid Fluorescence Measurement, Science 163(3872):1213-1214 (1969).
Van Dilla et al., The fluorescent cell photometer: a new method for the rapid measurement of biological cells stained with fluorescent dyes, Annual Report of the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California (Los Alamos, NM), Biological and Medical Research Groupp (H-4) of the Health Division, Compiled by D. G. Ott, pp. 100-105, distributed Jan. 23, 1968.
Vanhooke et al., Three-dimensional structure of the zinc-containing phosphotrieesterase with the bound substrate analog diethy 4-methylbenzylphosphonate, Biochemistry 35:6020-6025 (1996).
Varga, J.M. et al., Mechanism of allergic cross-reactions-I. Multispecific binding of ligands to a mouse monoclonal anti-DNP IgE antibody. Mol Immunol 28(6), 641-54 (1991).
Vary, A homogeneous nucleic acid hybridization assay based on strand displacement, Nucl Acids Res 15(17):6883-6897 (1987).
Venkateswaran et al., Production of Anti-Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies by In Vitro Immunization, Hybirdoma, 11(6):729-739 (1992).
Venter et al., The sequence of the human genome, Science 291(5507):1304-51 (2001).
Vogelstein et al., Digital PCR, PNAS 96(16):9236-9241 (1999).
Voss, E.W., Kinetic measurements of molecular interactions by spectrofluorometry, J Mol Recognit, 6:51-58 (1993).
Wahler, D. et al., Novel methods for biocatalyst screening. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 5: 152-158 (2001).
Walde, P. et al., Oparin's reactions revisited: enzymatic synthesis of poly(adenylic acid) in micelles and self-reproducing vesicles. J Am Chem Soc, 116: 7541-7547 (1994).
Walde, P. et al., Spectroscopic and kinetic studies of lipases solubilized in reverse micelles, Biochemistry, 32(15):4029-34 (1993).
Walde, P. et al., Structure and activity of trypsin in reverse micelles, Eur J Biochem, 173(2):401-9 (1988).
Walker et al., Isothermal in vitro amplification of DNA by a restriction enzyme/DNA polymerase system, PNAS 89(1):392-6 (1992).
Walker et al., Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique, Nucleic Acid Res, 20(7):1691-6 (1992).
Wang et al., DEP actuated nanoliter droplet dispensing using feedback control, Lab on a Chip 9:901-909 (2008).
Wang et al., Preparation of Titania Particles Utilizing the Insoluble Phase Interface in a MicroChannel Reactor, Chemical Communications 14:1462-1463 (2002).
Wang, A.M. et al., Quantitation of mRNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Proc natl Acad Sci USA 86(24), 9717-21 (1989).
Wang, G.T. et al., Design and synthesis of new fluorogenic HIV protease substrates based on resonance energy transfer, Tetrahedron Lett., 31:6493 (1990).
Wasserman et al., Structure and reactivity of allyl-siloxane monolayers formed by reaction of allcyltrichlorosilanes on silicon substrates, Langmuir 5:1074-1087 (1989).
Weil. et al., Selective and accurate initiation of transcription at the Ad2 major late promotor in a soluble system dependent on purified RNA polymerase II and DNA, Cell, 18(2):469-84 (1979).
Werle et al., Convenient single-step, one tube purification of PCR products for direct sequencing, Nucl Acids Res 22(20):4354-4355 (1994).
Wetmur et al., Molecular haplotyping by linking emulsion PCR: analysis of paraoxonase 1 haplotypes and phenotypes, Nucleic Acids Res 33(8):2615-2619 (2005).
Wick et al., Enzyme-containing liposomes can endogenously produce membrane-constituting lipids, Chem Biol 3(4):277-85 (1996).
Widersten and Mannervik, Glutathione Transferases with Novel Active Sites Isolated by Phage Display from a Library of Random Mutants, J Mol Biol 250(2):115-22 (1995).
Wiggins et al., Foundations of chaotic mixing, Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 362(1818):937-70 (2004).
Williams et al., Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR, Nature Methods 3(7):545-550 (2006).
Williams et al., Methotrexate, a high-affinity pseudosubstrate of dihydrofolate reductase, Biochemistry, 18(12):2567-73 (1979).
Wilson, D.S. and Szostak, J.W., In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 68: 611-647 (1999).
Winter et al., Making antibodies by phage display technology, Annu Rev Immunol 12:433-55 (1994).
Wittrup, K.D., Protein engineering by cell-surface display. Curr Opin Biotechnology, 12: 395-399 (2001).
Wolff et al., Integrating advanced functionality in a microfabricated high-throughput fluorescent-activated cell sorter, Lab Chip, 3(1): 22-27 (2003).
Wronski et al., Two-color, fluorescence-based microplate assay for apoptosis detection. Biotechniques, 32:666-668 (2002).
Wu et al., The ligation amplification reaction (LAR)-amplification of specific DNA sequences using sequential rounds of template-dependent ligation, Genomics 4(4):560-9 (1989).
Wyatt et al., Synthesis and purification of large amounts of RNA oligonucleotides, Biotechniques 11(6):764-9 (1991).
Xia and Whitesides, Soft Lithography, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37:550-575 (1998).
Xia and Whitesides, Soft Lithography, Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci. 28:153-184 (1998).
Xu, S. et al., Generation of monodisperse particles by using microfluidics: control over size, shape, and composition, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44:724-728 (2005).
Yamagishi, J. et al., Mutational analysis of structure-activity relationships in human tumor necrosis factor-alpha, Protein Eng, 3:713-9 (1990).
Yamaguchi et al., Insulin-loaded biodegradable PLGA microcapsules: initial burst release controlled by hydrophilic additives, Journal of Controlled Release, 81(3): 235-249 (2002).
Yelamos, J. et al., Targeting of non-Ig sequences in place of the V segment by somatic hypermutation. Nature 376(6537):225-9 (1995).
Yershov et al., DNA analysis and diagnostics on oligonucleotide microchips, PNAS 93(10):4913-4918 (1996).
Yu et al. Responsive biomimetic hydrogel valve for microfluidics. Appl. Phys. Lett 78:2589-2591 (2001).
Yu et al., Quantum dot and silica nanoparticle doped polymer optical fibers, Optics Express 15(16):9989-9994 (2007).
Yu et al., Specifc inhibition of PCR by non-extendable oligonucleotides using a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease-deficient DNA polymerase, Biotechniques 23(4):714-6, 718-20 (1997).
Zaccolo, M. et al., An approach to random mutagenesis of DNA using mixtures of triphosphate derivatives of nucleoside analogues. J Mol Biol 255(4):589-603 (1996).
Zakrzewski, S.F., Preparation of tritiated dihydrofolic acid of high specific activity, Methods Enzymol, 539 (1980).
Zaug and Cech, The intervening sequence RNA of Tetrahymena is an enzyme, Science 231(4737):470-5 (1986).
Zaug and Cech, The Tetrahymena intervening sequence ribonucleic acid enzyme is a phosphotransferase and an acid phosphatase, Biochemistry 25(16):4478-82 (1986).
Zaug et al., The Tetrahymena ribozyme acts like an RNA restriction endonuclease, Nature 324(6096):429-33 (1986).
Zhang et al., A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays, Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 4(2): 67-73 (1999).
Zhang, Z.Y., Substrate specificity of the protein tyrosine phosphatases, PNAS 90: 4446-4450 (1993).
Zhao, B. et al., Control and Applications of Immiscible Liquids in Microchannels, J. Am. Chem. Soc, vol. 124:5284-5285 (2002).
Zhao, H. et al., Molecular evolution by staggered extension process (StEP) in vitro recombination. Nat Biotechnol 16(3):258-61 (1998).
Zheng et al., A Droplet-Based, Composite PDMS/Glass Capillary Microfluidic System for Evaluating Protein Crystallization Conditions by Microbatch and Vapor-Diffusion Methods with On-Chip X-Ray Diffraction, Angew. Chem.,116:1-4, (2004).
Zheng et al., A Microiuidic Approach for Screening Submicroliter Volumes against Multiple Reagents by Using Performed Arrays of Nanoliter Plugs in a Three-Phase Liquid/Liquid/Gas Flow, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44(17): 2520-2523 (2005).
Zheng et al., Formation of Droplets of Alternating Composition in Microfluidic Channels and Applications to Indexing of Concentrations in Droplet-Based /Assays, Anal. Chem.,76: 4977-4982 (2004).
Zheng et al., Screening of Protein Crystallization Conditions on a Microfluidic Chip Using Nanoliter-Size Droplets, J Am Chem Soc 125(37):11170-11171 (2003).
Zimmermann et al., Dielectric Breakdown of Cell Membranes, Biophys J 14(11):881-889 (1974).
Zimmermann et al., Microscale Production of Hybridomas by Hypo-Osmolar Electrofusion, Hum. Antibod. Hybridomas, 3(1): 14-18 (1992).
Zubay, G., In vitro synthesis of protein in microbial systems, Annu Rev Genet, 7: 267-87 (1973).
Zubay, G., The isolation and properties of CAP, the catabolite gene activator, Methods Enzymol, 65: 856-77 (1980).
Zuckermann, R. et al., Efficient Methods for Attachment of Thiol-Specific Probes to the 3{-end of Synthetic Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Res. 15:5305-5321 (1987).

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20100210479 A1	Aug 2010	US

Continuations (2)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	11238257	Sep 2005	US
Child	12770006		US
Parent	PCT/GB2004/001352	Mar 2004	US
Child	11238257		US

Method of synthesis and testing of combinatorial libraries using microcapsules

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract