Method of treating cancer with docetaxel and doxorubicin

Abstract
Antitumor combinations comprising a taxane and at least one antibiotic for treating neoplastic diseases are described.
Description

The present invention relates to combinations of taxol, TAXOTERE (generically known as docetaxel) and their analogues and substances which are therapeutically useful in the treatment of neoplastic diseases.


Taxol, TAXOTERE and their analogues, which possess noteworthy antitumour and antileukaemic properties, are especially useful in the treatment of cancers of the ovary, breast or lung.


The preparation of taxol, TAXOTERE and their derivatives form the subject, for example, of European Patents EP 0,253,738 and EP 0,253,739 and International Application PCT WO 92/09,589.


Generally, the doses used, which depend on factors distinctive to the subject to be treated, are between 1 and 10 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally or between 1 and 3 mg/kg administered intravenously.


It has now been found, and this forms the subject of the present invention, that the efficacy of taxol, TAXOTERE and their analogues may be considerably improved when they are administered in combination with at least one substance which is therapeutically useful in anticancer treatments and has a mechanism identical to or different from this of taxane derivatives.


Among substances which may be used in association or in combination with taxol, TAXOTERE or their analogues, there may be mentioned alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide, isosfamide, melphalan, hexamethylmelamine, thiotepa or dacarbazine, antimetabolites such as pyrimidine analogues, for instance 5-fluorouracil and cytarabine or its analogues such as 2-fluorodeoxycytidine, or folic acid analogues such as methotrexate, idatrexate or trimetrexate, spindle poisons including vinca alkaloids such as vinblastine or vincristine or their synthetic analogues such as navelbine, or estraumestine or taxoids, epidophylloptoxins such as etoposide or teniposide, antibiotics such as daunorubicine, doxorubicin, bleomycin or mitomycin, enzymes such as L-asparaginase, topoisomerase inhibitors such as camptothecin derivates chosen from CPT-11 and topotecan or pyridobenzoindole derivatives, and various agents such as procarbazine, mitoxantrone, platinum coordination complexes such as cisplatin or carboplatin, and biological response modifiers or growth factor inhibitors such as interferons or interleukins.


Moreover, since the activity of the products depends on the doses used, it is possible to use higher doses and to increase the activity while decreasing the toxicity phenomena or delaying their onset by combining growth factors of the haematopoietic type such as G-CSF or GM-CSF or certain interleukins with taxol, TAXOTERE, their analogues or their combinations with other therapeutically active substances.


The combinations or associations according to the invention enable the phenomena of pleiotropic resistance or “multi-drug resistance” to be avoided to delayed.


More especially, the invention relates to combination of taxol, TAXOTERE and their analogues with vinca alkaloids, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cisplatin and estoposide.


The improved efficacy of a combination according to the invention may be demonstrated by determination of the therapeutic synergy.


The efficacy of a combination according to the invention may also be characterized by adding the actions of each constituent.


A combination manifests therapeutic synergy if it is therapeutically superior to one or other of the constituents used at its optimum dose [T. H. CORBETT et al., Cancer Treatment Reports, 66, 1187 (1982)].


To demonstrate the efficacy of a combination, it may be necessary to compare the maximum tolerated dose of the combination with the maximum tolerated dose of each of the separate constituents in the study in question. This efficacy may be quantified, for example by the log10 cells killed, which is determined according to the following formula:

log10 cells killed=T−C(days)/3.32×Td

in which T−C represents the time taken for the cells to grow, which is the mean time in days for the tumours of the treated group (T) and the tumours of the treated group (C) to have reached a predetermined value (1 g for example), and Td represents the time in days needed for the volume of the tumour to double in the control animals [T. H. CORBETT et al., Cancer, 40, 2660.2680 (1977); F. M. SCHABEL et al., Cancer Drug Development, Part B, Methods in Cancer Research, 17, 3-51, New York, Academic Press Inc. (1979)]. A product is considered to be active if log10 cells killed is greater than or equal to 0.7. A product is considered to be very active if log10 cells killed is greater than 2.8.


The combination, used at its own maximum tolerated dose, in which each of the constituents will be present at a dose generally not exceeding its maximum tolerated dose, will manifest therapeutic synergy when the log10 cells killed is greater than the value of the log10 cells killed of the best constituent when it is administered alone.


The efficacy of the combinations on solid tumours may be determined experimentally in the following manner:


The animals subjected to the experiment, generally mice, are subcutaneously grafted bilaterally with 30 to 60 mg of a tumour fragment on day 0. The animals bearing tumours are mixed before being subjected to the various treatments and controls. In the case of treatment of advanced tumours, tumours are allowed to develop to the desired size, animals having the insufficiently developed tumours being eliminated. The selected animals are distributed at random to undergo the treatments and controls. Animals not bearing tumours may also be subjected to the same treatments as the tumour-bearing animals in order to be able to dissociate the toxic effect from the specific effect on the tumour. Chemotherapy generally begins from 3 to 22 days after grafting, depending on the type of tumour, and the animals are observed every day. The different animal groups are weighed 3 or 4 times a week until the maximum weight loss is attained, and the groups are then weighed at least once a week until the end of the trial.


The tumours are measured 2 or 3 times a week until the tumour reaches approximately 2 g, or until the animal dies if this occurs before the tumour reaches 2 g. The animals are autopsied when sacrificed.


The antitumour activity is determined in accordance with the different parameters recorded.


For a study of the combinations on leukaemias, the animals are grafted with a particular number of cells, and the antitumour activity is determined by the increase in the survival time of the treated mice relative to the controls. The product is considered to be active if the increase in survival time is greater than 27%, and is considered to be very active if it is greater than 75% in the case of P388 leukaemia.


The results obtained with combinations of TAXOTERE and various chemotherapeutic agents, such as cyclophosphamide (alkylating agent), 5-fluorouracil (antimetabolite), etoposide (semisynthetic podophyllotoxin agent) and vincristine (vinca alkaloid), the combinations being used at their optimum dose, are given as examples in the following tables.









TABLE 1







Activity of the combination Taxotere + cyclophosphamide at the


optimum dose against advanced MA13/c mammary adenocarcinoma


grafted subcutaneously












Dose

Total
log10



mg/kg/injection
Administration
dose
cells


Product
i.v.
on days:
mg/kg
killed














Taxotere
15
14, 17, 20
45
2.8


Cylcophosphamide
118
14
118
1.3


Taxotere +
7.5
14, 17, 20, 14
22.5
3.4


cylcophosphamide
90.0

90
















TABLE 2







Activity of the combination Taxotere + etoposide at the optimum


dose against early B16 melanoma grafted subcutaneously












Dose

Total
log10



mg/kg/injection
Administration
dose
cells


Product
i.v.
on days:
mg/kg
killed














Taxotere
17.5
4, 7, 10, 13
70
2.8


Etoposide
46.2
4, 7, 10, 13
184.8
2.8


Taxotere +
15.7
4, 7, 10, 13
62.8
4.1


etoposide
13.8
(simultaneous)
55.2
















TABLE 3







Activity of the combination Taxotere + 5-fluorouracil at the


optimum dose against advanced C38 colon adenocarcinoma grafted


subcutaneously












Dose

Total
log10



mg/kg/injection
Administration
dose
cells


Product
i.v.
on days:
mg/kg
killed














Taxotere
22
21, 25, 29, 33
88.0
1.4


5-fluorouracil
43.4
21, 25, 29, 33
173.6
1.1


Taxotere +
17.6
21, 25, 29, 33
70.4
4.8


5-fluorouracil
27.0
(simultaneous)
108.0
















TABLE 4







Activity of the combination Taxotere + vincristine at the


optimum dose against P388 leukaemia (106 cells i.p.)












Dose

Total
log10



mg/kg/injection
Administration
dose
cells


Product
i.v.
on days:
mg/kg
killed














Taxotere
21.7
4, 7, 10
65.1
15


vincristine
1.2
4, 7, 10
3.6
46


Taxotere +
21.75
1, 4, 7
65.25
62


vincristine
1.2
(simultaneous)
3.6



Taxotere +
21.75
1, 4, 7
65.25
77


vincristine
1.2
(4 hours apart)
3.6









The present invention also relates to pharmaceutical compositions containing the combinations according to the invention.


The products of which the combinations are composed may be administered simultaneously, separately or spaced out over a period of time so as to obtain the maximum efficacy of the combination; it being possible for each administration to vary in its duration from a rapid administration to a continuous perfusion.


As a result, for the purposes of the present invention, the combinations are not exclusively limited to those which are obtained by physical association of the constituents, but also to those which permit a separate administration, which can be simultaneous or spaced out over a period of time.


The compositions according to the invention are preferably compositions which can be administered parentally. However, these compositions may be administered orally or intraperitoneally in the case of localized regional therapies.


The compositions for parental administration are generally phaimaceutically acceptable, sterile solutions or suspensions which may optionally be prepared as required at the time of use. For the preparation of non-aqueous solutions or suspensions, natural vegetable oils such as olive oil, sesame oil or liquid petroleum or injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate may be used. The sterile aqueous solutions can consist of a solution of the product in water. The aqueous solutions are suitable for intravenous administration provided the pH is appropriately adjusted and the solution is made isotonic, for example with a sufficient amount of sodium chloride or glucose. The sterilization may be carried out by heating or by any other means which does not adversely effect the composition. The combinations may also take the form of liposomes or the form of an association with carriers as cyclodextrins or polyethylene glycols.


The compositions for oral or intraperitoneal administration are preferably aqueous suspensions or solutions.


In the combinations according to the invention, the application of the constituents of which may be simultaneous, separate or spaced out over a period of time, it is especially advantageous for the amount of taxane derivative to represent from 10 to 90% by weight of the combination, it being possible for this content to vary in accordance with the nature of the associated substance, the efficacy sought and the nature of the cancer to be treated.


The combinations according to the invention are especially useful in the treatment of cancers of the breast, ovary or lung. In particular, they can afford the advantage of being able to employ the constituents at considerably lower doses than those at which they are used alone.


The example which follows illustrates a combination according to the invention.







EXAMPLE

10-cm3 ampoules containing 100 mg of TAXOTERE are prepared, for intravenous administration, according to the usual technique.


5-cm3 ampoules containing 100 mg of estoposide are prepared, for intravenous administration, according to the usual technique.


These solutions are administered simultaneously, after appropriate dilution, by perfusion.


The treatment may be repeated several times daily or weakly until there is a partial or total remission or a cure.

Claims
  • 1. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient comprising administering an effective amount of a combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin to the patient, wherein the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the optimum dose of docetaxel alone against said cancer in the human patient or the optimum dose of doxorubicin alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein docetaxel and doxorubicin are each present in a separate pharmaceutically acceptable composition and the compositions are administered simultaneously.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein docetaxel and doxorubicin are each present in a separate pharmaceutically acceptable composition and the compositions are administered sequentially.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is lung cancer.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is breast cancer.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is ovarian cancer.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is adenocarcinoma.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is melanoma.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the cancer is leukemia.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the docetaxel and doxorubicin are each administered parenterally or intraperitoneally.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the docetaxel and doxorubicin are each administered intravenously.
  • 12. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient according to claim 1, wherein the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the optimum dose of docetaxel alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 13. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient comprising administering an effective amount of a combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin to the patient, wherein the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel alone against said cancer in the human patient or the maximum tolerated dose of doxorubicin alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 14. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient according to claim 13, wherein the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 15. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient according to claim 1, wherein the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the optimum dose of doxorubicin alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 16. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient according to claim 13, wherein the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the maximum tolerated dose of doxorubicin alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 17. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient comprising administering an effective amount of a combination of the drugs docetaxel and doxorubicin to the patient, wherein the combination of the drugs docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the optimum dose of each drug alone against said cancer in the human patient.
  • 18. A method of treating a cancer in a human patient comprising administering an effective amount of a combination of the drugs docetaxel and doxorubicin to the patient, wherein the combination of the drugs docetaxel and doxorubicin has greater anticancer activity in the human patient than the maximum tolerated dose of each drug alone against said cancer in the human patient.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
92 13525 Nov 1992 FR national
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/422,823, filed Apr. 25, 2003, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/705,739, filed Nov. 6, 2000, abandoned; which is a division of application Ser. No. 09/506,902, filed Feb. 18, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,239,167; which is a division of application Ser. No. 09/371,520, filed Aug. 10, 1999, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,214,863; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/182,900, filed Oct. 30, 1998, abandoned; which is a division of application Ser. No. 08/967,036, filed Nov. 10, 1997, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,835; which is a division of application Ser. No. 08/424,470, filed May 9, 1995 (which is a national stage application under U.S.C. §371 of PCT/FR93/01096, filed Nov. 8, 1993), which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,728,687; and claims benefit of priority of French Patent No. 92 13525, filed Nov. 10, 1992; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (23)
Number Name Date Kind
4206221 Miller et al. Jun 1980 A
4814470 Colin et al. Mar 1989 A
4857653 Colin et al. Aug 1989 A
4876399 Holton et al. Oct 1989 A
4892735 Harrap Jan 1990 A
5015744 Holton May 1991 A
5136060 Holton Aug 1992 A
5229526 Holton Jul 1993 A
5254580 Chen et al. Oct 1993 A
5262409 Margolis et al. Nov 1993 A
5294637 Chen et al. Mar 1994 A
5294737 Ojima Mar 1994 A
5466834 Holton Nov 1995 A
5476954 Bourzat et al. Dec 1995 A
5494683 Liversidge et al. Feb 1996 A
5532388 Bouchard et al. Jul 1996 A
5645988 Vande Woude et al. Jul 1997 A
5728687 Bissery Mar 1998 A
5814658 Bouchard et al. Sep 1998 A
5908835 Bissery Jun 1999 A
6214863 Bissery Apr 2001 B1
6239167 Bissery May 2001 B1
6441026 Bissery Aug 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0317401 May 1989 EP
738 253 Jun 1995 EP
0 827 745 Mar 1998 EP
0 827 745 Mar 1998 EP
0 982 028 Mar 2000 EP
WO 9209589 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9219765 Nov 1992 WO
WO 9410995 May 1994 WO
WO 9413654 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9413655 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9738731 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9931140 Jun 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040152642 A1 Aug 2004 US
Divisions (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 09506902 Feb 2000 US
Child 09705739 US
Parent 09371520 Aug 1999 US
Child 09506902 US
Parent 08967036 Nov 1997 US
Child 09182900 US
Parent 08424470 US
Child 08967036 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 10422823 Apr 2003 US
Child 10747206 US
Parent 09705739 Nov 2000 US
Child 10422823 US
Parent 09182900 Oct 1998 US
Child 09371520 US