Patent Grant
7448375
This invention relates generally to a method of, aerosolized drug delivery. More specifically, this invention relates to controlling total inhaled volume to control the dosage of intrapulmonary delivery of insulin alone or in combination with other treatment methodologies which are combined to significantly reduce or eliminate the need for administering insulin by injection.
Diabetes Mellitus is a disease affecting approximately 7.5 million people in the United States. The underlying cause of this disease is diminished or absent insulin production by the Islets of Langerhans in the pancreas. Of the 7.5 million diagnosed diabetics in the United States, approximately one-third are treated using insulin replacement therapy. Those patients receiving insulin typically self-administer one or more doses of the drug per day by subcutaneous injection. Insulin is a polypeptide with a nominal molecular weight of 6,000 Daltons. Insulin has traditionally been produced by processing pig and cow pancreas to allow isolation of the natural product. More recently, recombinant technology has made it possible to produce human insulin in vitro. It is the currently common practice in the United States to institute the use of recombinant human insulin in all of those patients beginning insulin therapy.
It is known that most proteins are rapidly degraded in the acidic environment of the GI tract. Since insulin is a protein which is readily degraded in the GI tract, those in need of the administration of insulin administer the drug by subcutaneous injection (SC). No satisfactory method of orally administering insulin has been developed. The lack of such an oral delivery formulation for insulin creates a problem in that the administration of drugs by injection can be both psychologically and physically painful.
In an effort to provide for a non-invasive means for administering insulin, and thereby eliminate the need for hypodermic syringes, aerosolized insulin formulations have been theorized. Aerosolized insulin formulations have been shown to produce insulin blood levels in man when these aerosols are introduced onto nasal or pulmonary membrane. Moses et al. [Diabetes, Vol. 32, November 1983] demonstrated that a hypoglycemic response could be produced following nasal administration of 0.5 units/kg. Significant inter-subject variability was noted, and the nasal insulin formulation included unconjugated bile salts to promote nasal membrane penetration of the drug. Salzman et al. [New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 312, No. 17] demonstrated that an intranasal aerosolized insulin formulation containing a non-ionic detergent membrane penetration enhancer was effective in producing a hypoglycemic response in diabetic volunteers. Their work demonstrated that nasal irritation was present in varying degrees among the patients studied. In that diabetes is a chronic disease which must be continuously treated by the administration of insulin and in that mucosal irritation tends to increase with repeated exposures to the membrane penetration enhancers, efforts at developing a non-invasive means of administering insulin via nasal administration have not been commercialized.
In 1971, Wigley et al. [Diabetes, Vol 20, No. 8] demonstrated that a hypoglycemic response could be observed in patients inhaling an aqueous formulation of insulin into the lung. Radio-immuno assay techniques demonstrated that approximately 10 percent of the inhaled insulin was recovered in the blood of the subjects. Because the surface area of membranes available to absorb insulin is much greater in the lung than in the nose, no membrane penetration enhancers are required for delivery of insulin to the lungs by inhalation. The inefficiency of delivery seen by Wigley was greatly improved in 1979 by Yoshida et al. [Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 68, No. 5] who showed that almost 40 percent of insulin delivered directly into the trachea of rabbits was absorbed into the bloodstream via the respiratory tract. Both Wigley and Yoshida showed that insulin delivered by inhalation could be seen in the bloodstream for two or more hours following inhalation.
Aerosolized insulin therefore can be effectively given if the aerosol is appropriately delivered into the lung. In a review article, Dieter Kohler [Lung, supplement pp. 677-684] remarked in 1990 that multiple studies have shown that aerosolized insulin can be delivered into and absorbed from the lung with an expected absorption half-life of 15-25 minutes. However, he comments that “the poor reproducibility of the inhaled dose [of insulin] was always the reason for terminating these experiments.” This is an important point in that the lack of precise reproducibility with respect to the administration of insulin is critical. The problems associated with the inefficient administration of insulin cannot be compensated for by administering excess amounts of the drug in that the accidental administration of too much insulin could be fatal.
Effective use of an appropriate nebulizer can achieve high efficiency in delivering insulin to human subjects. Laube et al. [Journal of Aerosol Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1991] have shown that aerosolized insulin delivered from a jet nebulizer with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 1.12 microns, inhaled via a holding chamber at a slow inspiratory flow rate of 17 liters/minute, produced an effective hypoglycemic response in test subjects at a dose of 0.2 units/kg. Colthorpe et al. [Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1992] have shown that aerosolized insulin given peripherally into the lung of rabbits produces a bioavailability of over 50 percent in contrast to 5.6 percent bioavailability seen for liquid insulin dripped onto the central airways. Colthorpe's work supports the contention that aerosolized insulin must be delivered peripherally into the lung for maximum efficiency and that inadvertent central deposition of inhaled aerosolized insulin will produce an effect ten times lower than that desired. Variations in dosing of 10-fold are clearly unacceptable with respect to the administration of most drugs, and in particular, with respect to the administration of insulin.
The present invention endeavors to provide a non-invasive methodology for controlling the dosage of aerosolized insulin delivered to a patient.
The dosage of aerosolized insulin delivered to a patient's circulatory system is controlled by measuring and controlling the total volume of air inhaled by the patient. Specifically, repeated aerosolized doses of insulin containing formulation are administered to a patient while (1) measuring the total inhaled volume of air and (2) using the measurements to obtain the same inhaled volume with each delivery. The same inhaled volume can be obtained with each delivery by measuring the inhalation volume and stopping inhalation (e.g., by a mechanical means such as a trap door type valve) after a pre-determined volume is inhaled. To add to the repeatability of dosing it is preferable to measure and control the volume of air exhaled prior to inhalation for a delivery event. It is also preferable to measure the patient's inspiratory flow rate and volume and to repeatedly release each aerosolized dose to the patient at the same inspiratory flow rate and volume.
Insulin formulations are preferably aerosolized and administered via hand-held, self-contained units which are automatically actuated at the same release point in a patient's inspiratory flow cycle. The release point is automatically determined either mechanically or, more preferably calculated by a microprocessor which receives data from a sensor making it possible to determine inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory volume. The device can measure, provide information to the patient and as such consistently control the total inhaled volume for each release of aerosol. Preferably the device is loaded with a cassette comprised of an outer housing which holds a package of individual disposable collapsible containers of an insulin containing formulation for systemic delivery. Actuation of the device forces insulin formulation through a porous membrane of the container which membrane has pores having a diameter in the range of about 0.25 to 3.0 microns, preferably 0.5 to 1.5 microns. The device includes a means allowing for adjustments in the amount of force provided so that different amounts of formulation are forced from the container based on different amounts of force applied. The porous membrane is positioned in alignment with a surface of a channel through which a patient inhales air. The flow profile of air moving through the channel is such that the flow at the surface of the channel is less than the flow rate at the center of the channel. The membrane is designed so that it outwardly protrudes at all times or is made flexible so that when an insulin formulation is forced against and through the membrane the flexible membrane protrudes outward beyond the flow boundary layer of the channel into faster moving air. Because the membrane protrudes into the faster moving of the channel the particles of aerosol formed are less likely to collide allowing for the formation of a burst of fine aerosol mist with uniform particle size.
The dose of insulin to be delivered to the patient varies with a number of factors most importantly the patient's blood glucose level. Thus, the device can deliver all or any proportional amount of the formulation present in the container which can be obtained by adjusting the amount of force applied to the container. If only part of the contents are aerosolized the remainder can be aerosolized at a later time.
Smaller particle sizes are preferred to obtain systemic delivery of insulin. Thus, in one embodiment, after the aerosolized mist is released into the channel while energy is actively added to the particles (by heating the surrounding air) in an amount sufficient to evaporate carrier and thereby reduce particle size. The air drawn into the device can be actively heated by moving the air through a heating material which material is pre-heated prior to the beginning of a patient's inhalation. The amount of energy added can be adjusted depending on factors such as the desired particle size, the amount of the carrier to be evaporated, the water vapor content of the surrounding air and the composition of the carrier.
To obtain systemic delivery it is desirable to get the aerosolized insulin formulation deeply into the lung. This is obtained, in part, by adjusting particle sizes. Particle diameter size is generally about one to three times the diameter of the pore from which the particle is extruded. Energy may be added in an amount sufficient to evaporate all or substantially all carrier and thereby provide particles of dry powdered insulin or highly concentrated insulin formulation to a patient which particles are uniform in size regardless of the surrounding humidity and smaller due to the evaporation of the carrier.
In addition to adjusting particle size, systemic delivery of insulin obtained by releasing an aerosolized dose at a desired point in a patient's respiratory cycle. When providing systemic delivery it is important that the delivery be reproducible.
Reproducible dosing of insulin to the patient is obtained by providing for (1) measuring total exhaled volume prior to dosing (2) controlling total exhaled volume (3) measuring total inhaled volume while dosing (4) controlling total inhaled volume while dosing (5) controlling particle size (6) automatic release of insulin formulation in response to a determined inspiratory flow rate; (7) measuring inspiratory volume; and (8) prompting the patient for a pre-determined inspiratory flow rate throughout inspiration. The method involves consistently measuring for, determining and/or calculating each of 1-8 for each drug release decision based on instantaneously (or real time) calculated, measured, set and/or determined parameters. To obtain repeatability in dosing the insulin formulation is repeatedly released at the same point for each of (1)-(8). To maximize the efficiency of the delivery of the insulin formulation the formulation is released each time (1) within range of 3.8 to 4.2 liters of total inhaled volume (2) at a measured inspiratory flow rate in the range of from about 0.1 to about 2.0 liters/second; and (3) at a measured inspiratory volume in the range of about 0.1 to about 1.5 liters for the firing point.
A primary object is to provide a method of controlling the consistency of dosing insulin delivered by inhalation particularly by measuring and controlling the total volume of air inhaled with each inhaling of insulin.
Another object is to control the consistency of dosing insulin by inhaling by repeatedly controlling a variety of parameters within a given range.
Another object is to provide a method of delivering insulin which is sufficiently consistent so as to eliminate, at least in part, the need for injecting insulin.
Another object of the invention is to combine insulin delivery therapies with monitoring technologies so as to maintain tight control over the serum glucose level of a patient suffering from diabetes mellitus.
Another object of the invention is to provide a device which allows for the intrapulmonary delivery of controlled amounts of insulin based on the particular needs of the diabetic patient including serum glucose levels and insulin sensitivity.
Another object of the invention is to provide a means for treating diabetes mellitus which involves supplementing insulin administration using an intrapulmonary delivery means in combination with injections of insulin and/or oral hypoglycemic agents such as sulfonylureas.
An advantage of the present invention is that the methodology allows the administration of smaller doses of insulin by a convenient and painless route, thus decreasing the probability of insulin overdosing and increasing the probability of safely maintaining desired serum glucose levels.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the methodology and device can be readily used in public without the disturbing effects associated with publicly administering a drug by injection.
A feature of the present invention is that the device can be programmed for the patient to use the method while taking into account the particular needs of individual patients.
Another feature is that the device can be individually programmed based on the lung volume of the particular patient being treated.
Another feature of the device of the present invention is that it may be programmed to provide variable dosing so that different doses are delivered to the patient at different times of the day coordinated with meals and/or other factors important to maintain proper serum glucose levels with the particular patient.
Another feature of the invention is that the portable, hand-held inhalation device of the invention can be used in combination with a portable device for measuring serum glucose levels in order to closely monitor and titrate dosing based on actual glucose levels.
Yet another feature of the invention is that the microprocessor or the delivery device can be programmed to prevent overdosing by preventing the valve from being opened more than a given number of times within a given period of time.
An object of the invention is to provide a container which holds an aerosolizable formulation of insulin which container comprises a porous membrane which protrudes 4 outward in a stationary state or on the application of force forming a convex surface when drug formulation is forced against and through the membrane.
Another object is to provide a method for creating an aerosol of insulin formulation which comprises drawing air over a surface of a porous membrane in a channel and forcing formulation against the membrane so as to protrude the membrane through a flow boundary layer into faster moving air of the channel.
Another object is to provide a device which coaches patients to consistently administer doses of insulin in a manner which consistently administer the same amount of insulin to the circulatory system.
Another object of the invention is to adjust particle size by adding energy to the particles in an amount sufficient to evaporate carrier and reduce total particle size.
Another object is to provide a drug delivery device which includes a desiccator for drying air in a manner so as to remove water vapor and thereby provide consistent particle sizes even when the surrounding humidity varies.
Another object is to provide a device for the delivery of aerosols which measures humidity via a solid state hygrometer.
A feature of the invention is that drug can be dispersed or dissolved in a liquid carrier such as water and dispersed to a patient as dry or substantially dry particles.
Another advantage is that the size of the particles delivered will be independent of the surrounding humidity.
Another advantage is that the insulin can be stored in a dry state until just prior to delivery.
These and other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading the details of the structure of the device, formulation of compositions and methods of use, as more fully set forth below.
Before the present method of delivering aerosolized insulin to treat diabetes mellitus and devices, containers and formulations used in the treatment are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular methodology, containers, devices and formulations described, as such methods, devices and formulations may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention which will be limited only by the appended claims.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a formulation” includes mixtures of different formulations, reference to “an analog” refers to one or mixtures of insulin analogs, and reference to “the method of treatment” includes reference to equivalent steps and methods known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods, devices and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the invention, the preferred methods, devices and materials are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference for the purpose of describing and disclosing devices, formulations and methodologies which are described in the publication and which might be used in connection with the presently described invention.
The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the publication dates indicated here may be different from the actual date of publication.
Definitions
The term “insulin” shall be interpreted to encompass natural extracted human insulin, recombinantly produced human insulin, insulin extracted from bovine and/or porcine sources, recombinantly produced porcine and bovine insulin and mixtures of any of these insulin products. The term is intended to encompass the polypeptide normally used in the treatment of diabetics in a substantially purified form but encompasses the use of the term in its commercially available pharmaceutical form which includes additional excipients. The insulin is preferably recombinantly produced and may be dehydrated (completely dried) or in solution.
The term “insulin analog” is intended to encompass any form of “insulin” or defined above including forms wherein one or more of the amino acids within the polypeptide chain has been replaced with an alternative amino acid and/or wherein one or more of the amino acids has been deleted or wherein one or more additional amino acids has been added to the polypeptide chain. In general, the “insulin analogs” of the present invention include “super insulin analogs” wherein the ability of the insulin analog to affect serum glucose levels is substantially enhanced as compared with conventional insulin as well as hepatoselective insulin analogs which are more active in the liver than in adipose tissue. Analogs include insulin-like compounds used for the same general purpose as insulin such as insulin lispro i.e., compounds which are administered to reduce blood glucose levels.
The term “acceptable serum glucose level” is intended to mean a glucose level above 50 mg/dl and below 300 mg/dl more preferably 80 mg/dl to 200 mg/dl and most preferably about 100 mg/dl. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that levels of about 50 mg/dl are considered low and that levels of about 300 mg/dl are considered high, although acceptable in the sense that these levels are generally not fatal. It is an important aspect of the invention to maintain more acceptable levels which are above the low of 50 mg/dl and below the high of 300 mg/dl with it being more acceptable to deliver doses of insulin so as to keep the patient as close as possible to about 100 mg/dl.
The term “dosing event” shall be interpreted to mean the administration of insulin and/or an insulin analog to a patient in need thereof by the intrapulmonary route of administration which event may encompass one or more releases of insulin formulation from an insulin dispensing device (from one or more containers) over a period of time of 15 minutes or less, preferably 10 minutes or less, and more preferably 5 minutes or less, during which period one or more inhalations are made by the patient and one or more doses of insulin are released and inhaled. A dosing event shall involve the administration of insulin to the patient in an amount of about 1 unit to about 30 units in a single dosing event which may involve the release of from about 1 to about 300 units of insulin from the device.
The term “measuring” describes an event whereby either or both the inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory volume of the patient is measured. The measurement may be used to judge the extent of any breathing maneuver such as a maximum inhalation maneuver or an inhale-exhale maneuver and/or in order to determine an optional point in the inspiratory cycle at which to release aerosolized insulin formulation. Measuring meaning determining not controlling an amount. Measuring inspiratory flow during and after any drug delivery is used to coach a patient and after and after measuring it is desirable to record inspiratory flow rate and volume before, during and after the release of drug. Such reading makes it possible to determine if insulin formulation was properly delivered to the patient. A microprocessor or other device can calculate volume based on a measured flow rate. When either flow rate or volume becomes known in any manner it can be said to have been determined.
The term “substantially the same” is intended to mean that efforts are made to obtain the same volume amount but error will take place and result in the volumes being slightly different but substantially the same. Error on the order of .+−.20% or more preferably .+−.10% may take place in practice.
The term “monitoring” event shall mean measuring lung functions such as inspiratory flow, inspiratory flow rate, and/or inspiratory volume so that a patient's lung function as defined herein, can be evaluated before and/or after drug delivery thereby making it possible to evaluate the effect, if any, of insulin delivery on the patient's lung function.
The term “inspiratory flow rate” shall mean a value of air flow rate measured, calculated and/or determined based on the speed of the air passing a given point in a measuring device assuming atmospheric pressure .+−.5% and a temperature in the range of about 10.degree. C. to 40.degree. C.
The term “inspiratory flow” shall be interpreted to mean a value of air flow calculated based on the speed of the air passing a given point along with the volume of the air that has passed that point with the volume calculation being based on integration of the flow rate data and assuming atmospheric pressure, .+−.5% and temperature in the range of about 10.degree. C. to about 40.degree. C.
The term “inspiratory volume” shall mean a determined, calculated and/or measured volume of air passing a given point into the lungs of a patient assuming atmospheric pressure .+−.5% and a temperature in the range of 10.degree. C. to 40.degree. C.
The term “inhaling maximally” shall mean that the patient makes a maximal effort to inhale air into the lungs.
The terms “exhaling the forced vital capacity” and “exhaling maximally” are used interchangeably herein and shall mean making a maximal effort to exhale all air from the lungs, preferably exhaling all air in the lungs but for the residual volume.
The term “inhale-exhale” maneuver shall mean inhaling maximally followed by exhaling maximally. After inhaling maximally the patient can hold the inhaled air for any desired period of time before exhaling maximally or exhale maximally immediately following the maximal inhale.
The term “inspiratory flow profile” shall be interpreted to mean data calculated in one or more events measuring inspiratory flow and cumulative volume, which profile can be used to determine a point within a patient's inspiratory cycle which is preferred for the release of drug to be delivered to a patient. The point within the inspiratory cycle where drug is released may be based on a point within the inspiratory cycle likely to result in the maximum delivery of drug and based and/or on a point in the cycle most likely to result in the delivery of a reproducible amount of drug to the patient at each release of drug. Repeatability of the amount delivered is the primary criterion and maximizing the amount delivered is an important but secondary criterion. Thus, a large number of different drug release points might be selected and provide for repeatability in dosing provided the selected point is again selected for subsequent releases. To insure maximum drug delivery the point is selected within given parameters.
The term “therapeutic index” refers to the therapeutic index of a drug defined as LD50/ED50. The LD50 (lethal dose, 50%) is defined as the dose of a drug which kills 50% of the tested animals, and the ED50 is defined as the effective dose of the drug for 50% of the individuals treated. Drugs with a therapeutic index near unity (i.e. LD50/ED50 is approximately equal to 1) achieve their therapeutic effect at doses very close to the toxic level and as such have a narrow therapeutic window, i.e. a narrow dose range over which they may be administered.
The term “liquid formulation” is used herein to describe any pharmaceutically active insulin, analog thereof, or other drug for treating diabetes mellitus by itself or with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier in flowable liquid form and preferably having a viscosity and other characteristics such that the formulation is aerosolized into particles which are inhaled into the lungs of a patient after the formulation is moved through a porous membrane of the invention. Such formulations are preferably solutions, e.g. aqueous solutions, ethanolic solutions, aqueous/ethanolic solutions, saline solutions and colloidal suspensions. Formulations can be solutions or suspensions of drug in any fluid including fluids in the form of a low boiling point propellant.
The term “formulation” is used to encompass the term “liquid formulation” and to further include dry powders of insulin with or without excipient materials.
The term “substantially” dry shall mean insulin in a container or in particles of an aerosol which contain less than 10% free water, ethanol or other liquid carrier based on total weight and preferably contains no detectable free liquid carrier.
The terms “lung function” and “pulmonary function” are used interchangeably and shall be interpreted to mean physically measurable operations of a lung including but not limited to (1) inspiratory and (2) expiratory flow rates as well as (3) lung volume. Methods of quantitatively determining pulmonary function are used to measure lung function. Methods of measuring pulmonary function most commonly employed in clinical practice involve timed measurement of inspiratory and expiratory maneuvers to measure specific parameters. For example, forced vital capacity (FVC) measures the total volume in liters exhaled by a patient forcefully from a deep initial inspiration. This parameter, when evaluated in conjunction with the forced expired volume in one second (FEV1), allows bronchoconstriction to be quantitatively evaluated. A problem with forced vital capacity determination is that the forced vital capacity maneuver (i.e. forced exhalation from maximum inspiration to maximum expiration) is largely technique dependent. In other words, a given patient may produce different FVC values during a sequence of consecutive FVC maneuvers. The FEP 25-75 or forced expiratory flow determined over the mid-portion of a forced exhalation maneuver tends to be less technique dependent than the FVC. Similarly, the FEV1, tends to be less technique dependent than FVC. In addition to measuring volumes of exhaled air as indices of pulmonary function, the flow in liters per minute measured over differing portions of the expiratory cycle can be useful in determining the status of a patient's pulmonary function. In particular, the peak expiratory flow, taken as the highest air flow rate in liters per minute during a forced maximal exhalation, is well correlated with overall pulmonary function in a patient with asthma and other respiratory diseases. The present invention carries out treatment by administering drug in a drug delivery event and monitoring lung function in a monitoring event. A series of such events may be carried out and repeated over time.
The term “velocity of the drug” or “velocity of particles” shall mean the average speed of particles of respiratory drug formulation moving from a release point such as a porous membrane or a valve to a patient's mouth. In a preferred embodiment the velocity of the particles is zero or substantially zero in the absence of flow created by patient inhalation.
The term “bulk flow rate” shall mean the average velocity at which air moves through a channel considering that the flow rate is at a maximum in the center of the channel and at a minimum at the inner surface of the channel.
The term “flow boundary layer” shall mean a set of points defining a layer above the inner surface of a channel through which air flows wherein the air flow rate below the boundary layer is substantially below the bulk flow rate, e.g., 50% or less than the bulk flow rate.
The term “carrier” shall mean a liquid, flowable, pharmaceutically acceptable excipient material which insulin is suspended in or more preferably dissolved in. Useful carriers do not adversely interact with the insulin and have properties which allow for the formation of aerosolized particles preferably particles having a diameter in the range of 0.5 to 3.0 microns when a formulation comprising the carrier and respiratory drug is forced through pores having a diameter of 0.25 to 3.0 microns. Preferred carriers include water, ethanol and mixtures thereof. Other carriers can be used provided that they can be formulated to create a suitable aerosol and do not adversely effect the insulin or human lung tissue.
Each of the parameters discussed above is measured during quantitative spirometry. A patient's individual performance can be compared against his personal best data, individual indices can be compared with each other for an individual patient (e.g. FEV1 divided by FVC, producing a dimensionless index useful in assessing the severity of acute asthma symptoms), or each of these indices can be compared against an expected value Expected values for indices derived from quantitative spirometry are calculated as a function of the patient's sex, height, weight and age. For instance, standards exist for the calculation of expected indices and these are frequently reported along with the actual parameters derived for an individual patient during a monitoring event such as a quantitative spirometry test.
General Methodology
Diabetes mellitus is generally treated by the injection of insulin. The present invention endeavors to reduce or eliminate the need for injected insulin by consistently providing a controlled amount of aerosolized insulin to the patient's circulatory system. Insulin containing formulations can be aerosolized in a variety of different ways and thereafter inhaled into the lungs. When insulin is deposited on mucus membranes of the respiratory tract and particularly in the peripheral areas of the lung it is later absorbed into the circulatory system. Once in the circulatory system insulin has the effect of reducing the blood glucose level of the patient. For the patient's overall health it is desirable to maintain a moderate glucose level.
The present invention aids in maintaining the blood glucose at the desired level in a number of ways. First, most patients wish to avoid injections and as such are more likely to frequently administer insulin by inhalation than by injection. This is maybe due to both an aversion to insulin injections due to pain and social discomfort in some situations. The more frequently insulin is administered the tighter the control of glucose levels that can be obtained. However, when insulin is delivered by inhalation dosing can be inconsistent. Inconsistencies in the dosing of insulin can be a serious matter in that failure to provide sufficient insulin may cause the glucose level to rise to a dangerously high level. Further, if too much insulin is delivered the patient's glucose level may drop to a dangerously low level. Because of the need for consistency in dosing and inconsistent results obtained with dosing by inhalation patients administer insulin by injection. The present invention addresses factors which result in inconsistent dosing by inhalation and thereby provides a method for consistent dosing of insulin by inhalation.
The primary factor addressed by the present invention relating to the consistency of dosing insulin by inhalation is the total air volume inhaled by the patient. To address this factor the methodology of the present invention instructs the patient or uses a device which measures inspiratory flow and inspiratory volume. When the patient uses the device and is instructed to exhale to the maximal extent possible. After doing such the patient inhales with the device measuring the rate of inspiration as well as the volume inspired. The device will automatically fire a dose of aerosolized insulin formulation when a desired rate and volume has been obtained. That firing point will be repeated each time the patient delivers insulin. However, per the present invention the patient is instructed to continue inhalation to a given point after the firing point releases the aerosolized insulin. The given point is preferably the maximum amount of inhalation the patient can achieve. By maximizing the amount of inhalation the efficiency of the drug delivery will be improved. However, if the patient merely inhales the same volume for each drug delivery event, the dosing will be consistent and consistency of dosing is more important than maximizing the efficiency of delivery. For both purposes of simplicity and efficiency of dosing it is preferred that the patient inhale after the release of insulin until the patient inhales maximally.
To maximize the consistency in dosing of insulin by inhalation, a number of actors should simultaneously and repeatedly be taken into consideration using a device which measures inspiratory flow and inspiratory volume. Maximizing the repeatability of dosing is achieved by: (1) instructing the patient to exhale maximally prior to dosing; (2) instructing the patient to inhale at a moderate rate (preferably in the range of about 0.1 to 2 liters per second); (3) automatically firing the dose of aerosolized insulin at a predetermined point (relative to both the rate of inspiration and the volume inspired and preferably at a rate of 0.1 to 2 liters per second and in a volume in the range of 0.15 to 1.5 liters); (4) instructing the patient to continue inhalation after the aerosolized dosage is released wherein the inhalation is continued to a desired point where it is halted mechanically or preferably continued to the maximum point of inhalation; (5) controlling the particle size within the range of about 1.0 to about 3.0 microns in diameter.
Each time insulin is delivered to the patient by inhalation the insulin is released at the same point with respect to inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory volume. Further, the patient is instructed to perform the maneuvers with respect to completely exhaling prior to delivery and completely inhaling during and after delivery by using a particle size of a given diameter and repeating all parameters with respect to delivery and breathing maneuvers a high degree of repeatability in dosing can be obtained. After delivery it is preferable to perform a coached inhale-exhale maneuver which is described in detail within U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,250 issued Apr. 28, 1998 which is incorporated herein by reference. This maneuver will increase the rate at which insulin deposited in the lung enters the circulatory system. This is important in that it is desirable to make sure that any insulin delivered is having an effect in the circulatory system prior to delivering more insulin. The inhale-exhale maneuver is useful in avoiding overdosing.
Calibration
It is important to calibrate the device for obtaining consistent delivery. The calibration can be carried out with respect to a plurality of different parameters. In connection with the present invention it is important to calibrate by instructing the patient to exhale maximally and inhale maximally a number of times. This allows the device to determine the patient's total lung volume or total available lung volume which is the lung volume minus the residual amount which remains in the lung after exhaling maximally. After measuring the patient's total lung volume the device can be set to provide a signal to the patient indicating that the patient has achieved a complete exhale and/or has achieved a complete inhale maneuver. The signal can be provided by sound, light or a series of lights or a combination of light and sound. For example the device can be set to provide a green light when the patient is inhaling at a desired rate with a light turning red if the patient drops below or goes above a desired rate.
A patient using the device withdraws air from a mouthpiece and the inspiratory rate of the patient is measured as is cumulative respiratory volume one or more times in a monitoring event which determines a preferred point in an inhalation cycle for the release of a dose of insulin. Inspiratory flow is measured and recorded in one or more monitoring events for a given patient in order to develop an inspiratory flow profile for the patient. The recorded information is analyzed by the microprocessor in order to deduce a preferred point within the patient's respiratory cycle for the release of insulin with the preferred point being calculated based on the most likely point to result in a reproducible delivery event. The monitoring device continually sends information to the microprocessor, and when the microprocessor determines that the optimal point in the respiratory cycle is reached, the microprocessor actuates the opening of the valve allowing release of insulin. Accordingly, drug is always delivered at a pre-programmed place in the respiratory flow profile of the particular patient which is selected specifically to maximize reproducibility of drug delivery and peripheral dispersion of the drug. It is pointed out that the device of the present invention can be used to, and actually does, improve the efficiency of drug delivery. However, this is not the critical feature. The critical feature is the enhanced rate at which insulin is brought into the circulatory system and the reproducibility of the release of a tightly controlled amount of drug at a particular point in the inspiratory cycle so as to assure the delivery of a controlled and repeatable amount of drug to the lungs of each individual patient and allow further insulin to be absorbed more quickly if needed.
Each release of aerosolized formulation is preferable proceeded by a monitoring event. The monitoring event may include recalibration which takes into consideration any changes in the condition of the patient. For example, different bronchial conditions including asthma can affect lung volume and certain medications can affect the patient's ability to carry out certain breathing maneuvers. Accordingly, in preferred embodiments of the invention monitoring and recalibration is carried out frequently, e.g., once a day or prior to each dosing event.
Factors for Repeatable Dosing
In order to consistently deliver the same amount of aerosolized insulin to the patient's circulatory system with each release of aerosol it is important to take a number of factors into consideration simultaneously. Specifically, it is preferable to set various parameters at a given point and to repeatedly deliver drug to the patient at the same set parameters. The parameters may be set to improve efficiency of delivery. However, it is most important that the parameters remain set so that repeatable dosing is obtained. In order to obtain maximum repeatability of dosing it is desirable to:
(1) instruct the patient to completely exhale prior to delivery and then to inhale according to pre-programmed parameters (e.g., inhale until inhalation is mechanically halted or inhale maximally) with inhalation continuing after drug is delivered;
(2) release drug at a point within a patient's inspiratory flow rate inside a range of about 0.10 to about 2.0 liter/second preferably about 0.2 to about 1.8 liters per sec. and more preferably 0.15 to 1.7 liters per sec; and within a patient's inspiratory volume of about 0.15 to about 2.0 liters preferably 0.15 to 0.8 liters and more preferably 0.15 to about 0.4 liters;
(3) set the particle size for systemic delivery in a range of about 0.5 to 6 microns and more preferably 0.5 to about 3 microns;
(4) set the concentration of the drug in the carrier in the range of from about 0.01% to about 12.5%
(5) add heat to the air in an amount of about 20 Joules to about 100 Joules and preferably 20 Joules to about 50 Joules per 10 .mu.l of formulation;
(6) adjust the relative volume of air added by patient inhalation per 10 .mu.l of formulation at about 100 ml to 2 l and preferably about 200 ml to 1 liter for evaporation and without evaporation 50-750 ml preferably 200-400 ml;
(7) vibrate the porous membrane at a rate of from 575 to 17,000 kilohertz;
(8) adjust the pore size to a range of about 0.25 to about 6.0 microns in diameter preferably 0.5 to 3 microns and more preferably 1-2 microns;
(9) set the viscosity of the formulation to a range of from about 25% to 1,000% of the viscosity of water;
(10) use extrusion pressure in a range of about 50 to 800 psi and preferably 100 to 750 psi;
(11) carry out at an ambient temperature to 15.degree. C. to 30.degree. C. and ambient pressure between 1 atmosphere and 75% of 1 atmosphere;
(12) adjust the ratio of liquid carriers to each other to be consistent;
(13) use a desiccator to maximize removal of water vapor from air;
(14) adjust the shape of the pore opening to be circular in diameter and a conical in cross-section with the ratio of the diameter of the small to large end of the cone being about 1/2 to 1/20, and the shape of the porous membrane to an elongated oval;
(15) adjust the thickness of the membrane to 5 to 200 microns; preferably 10-50 microns;
(16) use a membrane having a convex shape or use a flexible membrane that protrudes outward in a convex shape beyond the flow boundary layer when formulation is forced through it; and
(17) the firing point to be at substantially the same point at each release for the parameters (1-16), i.e., each release of drug is at substantially the same point so as to obtain repeatability of dosing.
Amount of Insulin Dose
There is considerable variability with respect to the amount of insulin which is delivered to a patient when the insulin is being administered by injection. Patients requiring the administration of injectable insulin use commercial insulin which is prepared in concentrations of 100 units per milliliter, although higher concentrations up to about 500 units per milliliter can be obtained. It is preferable to use the more highly concentrated insulin in connection with the present invention. If insulin containing 500 units of insulin per milliliter is used and a patient is administering 5 units, then the patient will only need to administer 0.01 milliliters of the concentrated insulin to the lungs of the patient to achieve the desired dose.
The symptoms of diabetes can be readily controlled with the administration of insulin. However, it is extremely difficult, and probably impossible, to normalize the blood sugar throughout a 24-hour period utilizing traditional insulin therapy given as one or two injections per day. It is possible to more closely approach normalized blood sugar levels with the present invention. Improvements are obtained by smaller, more frequent dosing and by timing dosing relative to meals, exercise and sleep.
The precise amount of insulin administered to a patient varies considerably depending upon the degree of the disease and the size of the patient. A normal-weight adult may be started on about a 15-20 units a day in that the estimated daily insulin production rate in non-diabetic subjects of normal size is approximately 25 units per day. It is preferable to administer approximately the same quantity of insulin for several days before changing the dosing regime except with hypoglycemic patients for which the dose should be immediately decreased unless a clearly evident nonrecurrent cause of hypoglycemia (such as not eating, i.e., missing a typical meal) is present. In general, the changes should not be more than five to ten units per day. It is typical to administer about two-thirds of the total insulin daily dosage before breakfast and administer the remainder before supper. When the total dosage reaches 50 or 60 units per day, a plurality of smaller doses are often required since peak action of insulin appears to be dose related, i.e., a low dose may exhibit maximal activity earlier and disappear sooner than a large dose. All patients, are generally instructed to reduce insulin dosage by about 5 to 10 units per day when extra activity is anticipated. In a similar manner, a small amount of extra insulin may be taken before a meal that contains extra calories or food which is not generally eaten by the diabetic patient. The inhalation device of the present invention is particularly useful with respect to providing such small amounts of additional insulin.
Several types of insulin formulations are commercially available. When larger doses of insulin must be administered at a single point in time, it may be preferable to administer intermediate or long-acting insulin formulations. Such formulations release some insulin immediately and provide a more sustained release of the remainder of the insulin over time. Such formulations are described further below in the “Insulin Containing Formulations” section.
When administering insulin using the inhalation device of the present invention, the entire dosing event can involve the administration of anywhere from one to 25 units, but more preferably involves the administration of approximately five to ten units. The entire dosing event may involve several inhalations by the patient with each of the inhalations being provided with multiple bursts of insulin from the device. For example, the device can be programmed so as to release enough insulin so that approximately one unit of insulin is delivered to the patient per inhalation or 0.33 units of insulin per bus with three bursts being delivered per inhalation. If ten units are to be delivered, the ten units are delivered by releasing 33 bursts in ten different inhalations. Such a dosing event should take about 1-2 minutes to deliver 10 units of insulin. Since only small amounts are delivered with each burst and with each inhalation, even a complete failure to deliver insulin with a given inhalation or burst is not of great significance and will not seriously disturb the reproducibility of the dosing event. Further, since relatively small amounts are delivered with each inhalation and/or burst, the patient can safely administer an additional unit or two of insulin without fear of overdosing.
There is a differential between the amount of insulin actually released from the device and the amount of insulin actually delivered to the patient. The present device is two to ten times more efficient than conventional inhalation devices (i.e., MDIs or metered dose inhalers) which have an efficiency as low as 10% meaning that as little as 10% of the released insulin may actually reach the circulatory system of the patient. The efficiency of the delivery will vary somewhat from patient to patient and should be taken into account when programming the device for the release of insulin.
One of the difficulties with aerosolized delivery of insulin is that the patient and/or the caregiver cannot determine precisely how much insulin has entered the circulatory system. Accordingly, if the patient has been dosed with what is believed to be an adequate amount of aerosolized insulin and the glucose level remains high one might assume that the aerosolized dose was not properly delivered. For example, the insulin might have been improperly delivered against the patient's mouth surfaces or throat where it will not be absorbed into the circulatory system. However, it may be that the insulin is properly delivered to the lung (e.g., provided on the outer peripheral areas of the lung) but has not yet migrated into the circulatory system. The inhale-exhale maneuver described above provides a mechanism for more quickly bringing the insulin deposited on lung tissue into the circulatory system. Specifically, the patient inhales maximally and then exhales maximally.
Obese patients are generally somewhat less sensitive to insulin and must be provided with higher doses of insulin in order to achieve the same effect as normal weight patients. Dosing characteristics based on insulin sensitivity are known to those skilled in the art and are taken into consideration with respect to the administration of injectable insulin. The present invention makes it possible to vary dosing over time if insulin sensitivity changes and/or if user compliance and/or lung efficiency changes over time.
Based on the above, it will be understood that the dosing or amount of insulin actually released from the device can be changed based on the most immediately prior monitoring event wherein the inspiratory flow of a patient's inhalation is measured. The amount of insulin released can also be varied based on factors such as timing and timing is, in general, connected to meal times, sleep times and, to a certain extent, exercise times. Although all or, any of these, events can be used to change the amount of insulin released from the device and thus the amount of insulin delivered to the patient, ultimately, the amount released and delivered to the patient is based on the patient's serum glucose levels. It is important to maintain a patient's serum glucose levels within acceptable levels (greater than 60 mg/dl and less than 125 mg/100 ml and most preferably to maintain those levels at about 80 mg/100 ml.
Variations in doses are calculated by monitoring serum glucose levels in response to known amounts of insulin released from the device. If the response in decreasing serum glucose level is higher than with previous readings, then the dosage is decreased. If the response in decreasing serum glucose level is lower than with previous readings, then the dosing amount is increased. The increases and decreases are gradual and are preferably based on averages (of 10 or more readings of glucose levels after 10 or more dosing events) and not a single dosing event and monitoring event with respect to serum glucose levels. The present invention can record dosing events and serum glucose levels over time, calculate averages and deduce preferred changes in administration of insulin.
As another feature of the invention, the device can be programmed so as to prevent the administration of more than a given amount of insulin within a given period of time. For example, if the patient normally requires 25 units per day of insulin, the microprocessor of the inhalation device can be programmed to prevent further release of the valve after 35 units has been administered within a given day. Setting a slightly higher limit would allow for the patient to administer additional insulin, if needed, due to larger than normal meals and/or account for misdelivery of insulin such as due to coughing or sneezing during an attempted delivery.
The ability to prevent overdosing is a characteristic of the device due to the ability of the device to monitor the amount of insulin released and calculate the approximate amount of insulin delivered to the patient based on monitoring given events such as airflow rate and serum glucose levels. The ability of the present device to prevent overdosing is not merely a monitoring system which prevents further manual actuation of a button. As indicated above, the device used in connection with the present invention is not manually actuated, but is fired in response to an electrical signal received from a microprocessor. Applicant's device does not allow for the release of insulin merely by the manual actuation of a button to fire a burst of insulin into the air.
The microprocessor can be designed so as to allow for an override feature which would allow for the administration of additional insulin. The override feature could be actuated in an emergency situation. Alternatively, the override feature could be actuated when the device is electronically connected with a serum glucose level monitoring device which determines that serum glucose levels increase to dangerously high levels.
The microprocessor will preferably include a timing device. The timing device can be electrically connected with visual display signals as well as audio alarm signals. Using the timing device, the microprocessor can be programmed so as to allow for a visual or audio signal to be sent when the patient would be normally expected to administer insulin. In addition to indicating the time of administration (preferably by audio signal), the device can indicate the amount of insulin which should be administered by providing a visual display. For example, the audio alarm could sound alerting the patient that insulin should be administered. At the same time, the visual display could indicate “five units” as the amount of insulin to be administered. At this point, a monitoring event could take place. After completion of the monitoring event, administration would proceed and the visual display would continually indicate the remaining amount of insulin which should be administered. After the predetermined dose of five units had been administered, the visual display would indicate that the dosing event had ended. If the patient did not complete the dosing event by administering the stated amount of insulin, the patient would be reminded of such by the initiation of another audio signal, followed by a visual display instructing the patient to continue administration.
In connection with the delivery of insulin different amounts of insulin are required by the patient depending upon the patient's glucose level. Because the amount of insulin required can vary considerably it is necessary to provide a system which can deliver a wide variety of different amounts of insulin. This could be done by varying the amount of insulin contained within the container package. However, such would require producing a large number of different containers. Accordingly, the present invention includes the concept of delivering only a portion of the insulin present within a container. This can be done by adjusting the amount of force applied to the container when the formulation is forced from the container through the porous membrane. By adjusting the amount of force applied, formulation of an amount of anywhere from 100% to 1% of the formulation could be forced from the package in incremental amounts of 1%, 10%, 25% or any desired percentage amount.
Additional information regarding dosing with insulin via injection can be found within Harrison's—Principles of Internal Medicine (most recent edition) published by McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, incorporated herein by reference to disclose conventional information regarding dosing insulin via injection.
Drug Delivery with Disposable Container
The piston 9 has been forced against the container wall 2 after a patient 10 begins inhalation in the direction of the arrow “1”. The patient 10 inhales through the mouth from a tubular channel 11. The velocity of the air moving through the flow path 29 of the channel 11 can be measured across the diameter of the channel to determine a flow profile 12, i.e., the air flowing through the channel 11 has a higher velocity further away from the inner surface of the channel. The air velocity right next to the inner surface of the channel 11 (i.e., infinitely close to the surface) is very slow (i.e., approaches zero). A flow boundary layer 13 defines a set of points below which (in a direction from the channel center toward the inner surface of the channel) the flow of air is substantially below the bulk flow rate i.e., 50% or less than the bulk flow rate.
To allow air to flow freely through the channel 11 the upper surface of the flexible porous membrane 3 is substantially flush with (i.e., in substantially the same plane as) the inner surface of the channel 11. Thus, if the membrane 3 remained in place when the formulation 5 move through the pores the formulation would be released into the slow moving or substantially “dead air” below the boundary layer 13. However, the membrane 3 protrudes outward through the boundary layer 13 into the faster moving air. This is desirable in that it aids in avoiding the coagulation of particles. More specifically, when formulation exits the pores the formulation naturally forms spherical particles. Those particles slow down due to the frictional resistance created by the air through which the particles must travel. The particles existing behind them can face reduced air friction because the preceding particle have moved the air aside. Thus later released particles catch up with and merge into the earlier released particles. This can cause a chain reaction resulting in the formation of large particles which can not be readily inhaled into the lung—e.g., the formation of particles having a diameter of more than about 12.0 microns.
A plan view of a simple embodiment of a drug delivery device 40 of the present invention is shown within
As shown in
Conventional metered dose inhalers and nebulizers suffer from a number of disadvantages. These disadvantages result in the inability to use these devices to repeatedly deliver the same amount of drug to a patient. The disadvantages are due, in part, to the inability to control particle size—especially when the device is used in diverse environments with greatly different humidity conditions or when differing amounts of drug are delivered into a fixed amount of air or similar quantities of drug are delivered into differing amounts of air. By adding sufficient energy to the particles to evaporate any carrier particle size is reduced to a uniform minimum and, any humidity variations do not affect particle variability. Further the drug dispensing device of the present invention preferably includes electronic and/or mechanical components which eliminate direct user actuation of drug release. More specifically, the device preferably includes a means for measuring inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory volume and sending an electrical signal as a result of the simultaneous measurement of both (so that drug can be released at the same point each time) and also preferably includes a microprocessor which is programmed to receive, process, analyze and store the electrical signal of the means for measuring flow and upon receipt of signal values within appropriate limits sending an actuation signal to the mechanical means which causes drug to be extruded from the pores of the porous membrane.
The device 40 shown in
The device 40 is a hand-held, portable device which is comprised of (a) a device for holding a disposable package with at least one but preferably a number of drug containers, and (b) a mechanical mechanism for forcing the contents of a container (on the package) through a porous membrane. The device preferably further includes (c) a heating mechanism for adding energy to the air flow into which particles are released, (d) a monitor for analyzing the inspiratory flow of a patient, (e) a switch for automatically releasing or firing the mechanical means after the inspiratory flow rate and/or volume reaches a predetermined point (f) a means for measuring ambient temperature and humidity and (g) a source of power e.g., conventional batteries.
The device for holding the disposable package may be nothing more than a narrow opening created between two outwardly extending bars 42 and 82 or may include additional components such as one or more wheels, sprockets or rollers notably mounted on the end(s) of such bars. The rollers may be spring mounted so as to provide constant pressure against the surface(s) of the package. The device may also include a transport mechanism which may include providing drive power to the roller(s) so that when they are rotated, they move the package from one container to the next. The power source 43 driving the roller(s) is programmed via the microprocessor 26 to rotate the rollers only enough to move the package 39 from one container 1 to the next. In order to use the device 40, the device 40 must be “loaded,” i.e. connected to a package 39 which includes drug dosage units having liquid, flowable formulations of pharmaceutically active insulin therein. The entire device 40 is self-contained, light weight (less than 1 kg preferably less than 0.5 kg loaded) and portable. The power source 43 is preferably in the form of standard alkaline batteries. Two 9 volt batteries could supply the heat required to heat the air which contacts the particles by about 20.degree. C. for about 100 doses (see
The formulation is preferably heated after the formulation has been forced through the pores of the membrane 3 and aerosolized i.e., energy is preferably added by heating the surrounding air by means of the air-heating mechanism 14 positioned anywhere within the flow path 29. The amount of energy added by the formulation heating mechanism 45 or air-heating mechanism 5 is controlled by the microprocessor 26 based on the amount of formulation in the container 1 and other factors such as the concentration of the insulin in the formulation and surrounding humidity. A hygrometer 50 and thermometer 51 are electrically connected to the microprocessor 26 allowing the amount of heat to be added to be adjusted based on ambient humidity and temperature.
The carrier may be chosen to provide for greater solubility of insulin in the carrier to obtain a high concentration of insulin and thus require less energy to obtain evaporation of the carrier. Droplets having a diameter of 6.3 microns can be formed and subjected to evaporation to obtain a particle of one micron in diameter. In the respiratory tract this one micron particle would be expected to grow to a 3 micron particle due to moisture added from the high humidity environment of the respiratory tract.
Energy for Evaporation
The evaporation and growth rates of aqueous droplets is a function of their initial diameter, the amount of drug dissolved therein (concentration) and the ambient relative humidity. The determining factor is whether the water vapor concentration at the surface of the droplet is higher or lower than that of the surrounding air. Because the relative humidity at the surface of a particle (i.e. droplet of aerosolized formulation) is close to 100% for all the low concentration formulations, a five micron droplet will evaporate to a 1 micron dry particle in 0% humidity in less than 20 ms. However, if a particle of drug 1 micron diameter is inhaled into the lungs (99.5% humidity) it can grow to about 3 microns in diameter in approximately one second by accumulating water from the humid lung environment.
Desiccator
The opening 38 may have a desiccator 41 positioned therein which desiccator includes a material which removes water vapor from air being drawn into the flow path 29. By reducing or more preferably eliminating water vapor from the air any water in particles of formulation can be more efficiently evaporated. Further, the particles delivered to the patient will have a smaller and more uniform size whether or not energy is added to cause evaporation of water from the particles of the formulation.
The device may include a mouth piece 30 at the end of the flow path 29. The patient inhales from the mouth piece 30 which causes an inspiratory flow to be measured by flow sensor 31 within the flow path which path may be, and preferably is, in a non-linear flow-pressure relationship. This inspiratory flow causes an air flow transducer 37 to generate a signal. This signal is conveyed to a microprocessor which is able to convert, continuously, the signal from the transducer 37 in the inspiratory flow path 29 to a flow rate in liters per minute. The microprocessor 26 can further integrate this continuous air flow rate signal into a representation of cumulative inspiratory volume. At an appropriate point in the inspiratory cycle, the microprocessor can send a signal to send power from the power source 43 to the air-heating mechanism 14 which uses information from the hygrometer 50, thermometer 51 and particle size and amount of formulation. The microprocessor also sends a signal to an actuator which causes the mechanical means (e.g., the piston 24) to force drug from a container of the package into the inspiratory flow path 29 of the device and ultimately into the patient's lungs. After being released, the drug and carrier will pass through a porous membrane 3 to aerosolize the formulation and thereafter enter the lungs of the patient.
When the formulation 5 includes water as all or part of the carrier it is also desirable to include a desiccator 41 within the flow path 29. The desiccator 41 is preferably located at the initial opening 38 but maybe located elsewhere in the flow path 29 prior to a point in the flow path when the formulation is fired into the flow path in the form of aerosolized particles. By drawing air through the desiccator 41 water vapor within the air is removed in part or completely. Therefore, only dried air is drawn into the remainder of a flow path. Since the air is completely dried water carrier within the aerosolized particles will more readily evaporate. This decreases the energy needs with respect to the heating devices 14. The desiccator material can be any compound which absorbs water vapor from air. For example, it may be a compound selected from the group consisting of P2O5, Mg(ClO4), KOH, H2 SO4, NaOH, CaO, CaCl2, ZnCl2, and CaSO4.
Convex/Flexible Porous Membrane
As shown in
When pores of the membrane 3 are positioned beyond the boundary layer into the faster moving air of the channel advantages are obtained. Specifically, the (1) formulation exiting the pores is moved to an air stream where it can be readily carried to the patient and (2) the particles formed do not exit into slow moving or “dead” air and thus do not rapidly decelerate to a degree such that particles behind them catch up with, collide into and merge with the particle. Particle collisions are not desirable because they (a) result in particles which are too large and cannot be efficiently inhaled into the lung; and (b) result in an aerosol with diverse and unpredictable particle sizes. Either or both (a) and (b) can result in erratic dosing.
The air-heating mechanism 14 heats the surrounding air within the flow path 29. This causes carrier in the formulation to be evaporated more readily. If sufficient heat is added the only material reaching the patient is the substantially dry insulin drug.
The methodology of the present invention could be carried out with a device that obtains power from a plug-in source. However, the device is preferably a self-contained, hand-held device which is battery powered. Heating mechanisms of various types can be used. For example, see the heating mechanism in the self-contained, portable sealer for plastic colostomy bags in French patent 2,673,142 which is incorporated herein by reference. A portable heater is also taught in European patent applications 0,430,566 A2 for a “Flavor delivering article” and 0,358,002 for “Smoking articles utilizing electric energy,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe heating components powered by batteries.
Supplemental Treatment Methodology
Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus may be treated solely with insulin as indicated above. However, it is possible to treat such patients with a combination of insulin and other drugs such as sulfonylureas which act primarily by stimulating release of insulin from the beta cells in the pancreas. These drugs have the ability of increasing the number of insulin receptors in target tissues and enhance insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Some specific sulfonylurea drugs which can be used in connection with the present invention include acetohexamide administered in an amount of about 500 to 1,500 mg per day; chlorpropamide, administered in an amount of about 50 to 750 mg per day; tolazamide, administered in an amount of about 0.1 to 1 gram per day; tolbutamide, administered in an amount of about 0.5 to 3 grams per day; glipzide administered in an amount of about 2.5 to 40 mg per day and glyburide administered in an amount of about 1.25 to 20 mg per day.
In patients who are producing some insulin, the sulfonylurea drugs may be sufficient to treat the symptoms. Other patients can use a combination of the drugs while administering insulin, while still others require only the administration of insulin. The present invention is beneficial to each type of patient. Further, the present invention allows means for eliminating the need for some patients to take insulin by injection. The patients can be provided with oral doses of sulfonylureas in amounts similar to those indicated above while administering small amounts of insulin via the intrapulmonary route using the device of the present invention. In accordance with one method of the invention, the patient is administered a sulfonylurea drug orally and that treatment is supplemented with insulin administration in relatively small amounts, e.g., five to ten units per dosing event with two to three dosing events per day. Alternatively, the patient is primarily treated by the administration of insulin via the intrapulmonary route and that treatment is supplemented by the oral administration of sulfonylureas of the type described above.
Based on the above, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that a plurality of different treatments and means of administration can be used to treat a single patient. For example, a patient can be simultaneously treated with insulin by injection, insulin via intrapulmonary administration in accordance with the present invention, and sulfonylurea drugs, which are orally administered. Benefits can be obtained by the oral administration of sulfonylurea drugs in that the insulin is naturally released by the patient in a fashion in accordance with real needs related to serum glucose levels. This natural insulin is supplemented by smaller doses provided by intrapulmonary administration in accordance with the present invention. Should such prove to be ineffective for whatever reason, such as breathing difficulties, such could be supplemented by administration via injection.
Drug Delivery Device
The device preferably includes a means for recording a characterization of the inspiratory flow profile for the patient which is possible by including a microprocessor 26 in combination with a read/write memory means and a flow measurement transducer. By using such devices, it is possible to change the firing threshold at any time in response to an analysis of the patient's inspiratory flow profile, and it is also possible to record drug dosing events over time. In a particularly preferred embodiment the characterization of the inspiratory flow can be recorded onto a recording means on the disposable package.
The embodiment shown in
It is important to note that a variety of devices can be used in order to carry out the methodology of the present invention. However, the device must be capable of aerosolizing a drug formulation in a container and preferably does such by forcing formulation through a porous membrane with the release point based on pre-programmed criteria which may be mechanically set or electronically set via criteria readable by the microprocessor 26. The details of the microprocessor 26 and the details of other drug delivery devices which include a microprocessor and pressure transducer of the type used in connection with the present invention are described and disclosed within U.S. Pat. No. 5,404,871, issued Apr. 11, 1995, entitled “Delivery of Aerosol Medications for Inspiration” which patent is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference, and it is specifically incorporated in order to describe and disclose the microprocessor and program technology used therewith. The pre-programmed information is contained within a nonvolatile memory which can be modified via an external device. In another embodiment, this pre-programmed information is contained within a “read only” memory which can be unplugged from the device and replaced with another memory unit containing different programming information. In yet another embodiment, microprocessor 26, containing read only memory which in turn contains the pre-programmed information, is plugged into the device. For each of these three embodiments, changing the programming of the memory device readable by microprocessor 26 will radically change the behavior of the device by causing microprocessor 26 to be programmed in a different manner. This is done to accommodate different drugs for different types of treatment.
Microprocessor 26 sends signals via electrical connection 27 to electrical actuation device 28 which actuates the means 23 which fires the mechanical plate 24 forcing drug formulation in a container 1 to be aerosolized so that an amount of aerosolized drug is delivered into the inspiratory flow path 29 when the flexible membrane 3 protrudes outward through the flow boundary layer. A signal is also sent to the heater 14 to add heat energy to the air in the flow path 29. The device 28 can be a solenoid, motor, or any device for converting electrical to mechanical energy. Further, microprocessor 26 keeps a record of all drug dosing times and amounts using a read/write non-volatile memory which is in turn readable by an external device. Alternatively, the device records the information onto an electronic or magnetic strip on the package 1. The recorded information can be read later by the care-giver to determine the effectiveness of the treatment. In order to allow for ease of use, it is possible to surround the inspiratory flow path 29 with a mouth piece 30.
The electrical actuation means 28 is in electrical connection with the flow sensor 31 which is capable of measuring a flow rate of about 0 to about 800 liters per minute. It should be noted that inhalation flow rates are less than exhalation rates, e.g. max for inhalation 200 lpm and 800 lpm for exhalation. A variety of different types of flow sensors may be used as per U.S. Pat. No. 5,394,866, issued Mar. 7, 1995, U.S. Pat. No. 5,404,871, issued Apr. 11, 1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,336, issued Sep. 12, 1995, which are incorporated herein by reference. The flow sensor 31 includes screens 32, 33 and 34 which are positioned approximately ¼″ apart from each other but may be comprised of a single screen or include a non-linear flow path. It is preferable to include the desiccator 41 at a point prior to the screens 32, 33 and 34 in the flow path so that the elimination of water vapor is considered in any measurement.
As shown in
Tubes 35 and 36 open to the area between the screens 32, 33 and 34 with the tubes 35 and 36 being connected to a conventional differential pressure transducer 37. Another transducer designed to measure outflow through the opening 38 is also preferably included or the flow sensor 31 is designed so that the same components can measure inflow and outflow. When the user draws air through inspiratory flow path 29, air is passed through the screens 32, 33 and 34 and the air flow can be measured by the differential air pressure transducer 37. Alternatively, other means to measure pressure differential related to air flow, such as a conventional measuring device in the air way, may be used. The flow sensor 31 is in connection with the electrical actuation means 28 (via the connector 39 to the processor 26), and when a threshold value of air flow is reached (as determined by the processor 26), the electrical actuation means 28 fires the release of a mechanical means 23 releasing the plate 24 which forces the release of formulation from a container 1 so that a controlled amount of insulin is delivered to the patient. The microprocessor 26 is optionally connected to an optionally present vibrating device 45 which may be activated.
Vibration Device
The vibration device 45 creates ultrasonic vibrations which are preferably at right angles to the plane of the membrane 3. The device 45 may be in the form of a piezoelectric ceramic crystal or other suitable vibration mechanism. A vibrating device 45 in the form of a piezoelectric crystal may be connected to the porous membrane by means of an attenuator horn or acoustic conduction mechanism, which when correctly matched with the piezoelectric crystal frequency, efficiently transmits ultrasonic oscillations of the piezoelectric crystal to the resonance cavity and the porous polycarbonate membrane and if sized correctly permits the ultrasonic energy to be focused in a polycarbonate membrane 3 allowing for maximum use of the energy towards aerosolizing the liquid formulation 5. The size and shape of the attenuator horn is not of particular important. It is preferred to maintain a relatively small size in that the device is hand held. The components are chosen based on the particular material used as the porous material, the particular formulation used and with consideration of the velocity of ultrasonic waves through the membrane to achieve a harmonic relationship at the frequency being used.
A high frequency signal generator drives the piezoelectric crystal. This generator is capable of producing a signal having a frequency of from about 575 kilohertz (Khz) to about 32,000 kilohertz, preferably 1,000 to 17,000 kilohertz, more preferably 2,000 to 4,000 kilohertz. The power output required depends upon the amount of liquid being nebulized per unit of time and the area and porosity of the membrane (generally comprised of a polymeric plastic-like material) used for producing the drug dosage unit and/or the efficiency of the connection.
Vibration is applied while the formulation 5 is being forced from the pores of the polycarbonate membrane 3. The formulation can be aerosolized with only vibration i.e., without applying pressure. Alternatively, when vibration is applied in certain conditions the pressure required for forcing the liquid out can be varied depending on the liquid, the size of the pores and the shape of the pores but is generally in the range of about 50 to 600 psi, preferably 100 to 500 psi and may be achieved by using a piston, roller, bellows, a blast of forced compressed gas, or other suitable device. The vibration frequency used and the pressure applied can be varied depending on the viscosity of the liquid being forced out and the diameter and length of the openings or pores.
It is desirable to force formulation through the porous membrane with a relatively low pressure e.g., pressure less than 500 psi in that lower pressure reduces the chance of breaking the membrane during the release of formulation and makes it possible to make a thinner membrane. The thinner membranes make it easier to make small holes in that the holes or pores of the membrane are created using a focussed LASER. It is possible to reduce the pressure further by making the holes conical in cross-section. A LASER with a conical focus is used to burn holes through the membrane. The larger diameter of the conical shape is positioned next to the formulation and the smaller diameter opening is the opening through which the formulation ultimately flows. The ratio of the smaller opening to the diameter of the larger opening is in the range of about 1:2 to about 1:20 i.e., the larger opening is between 2 and 20 times the diameter of the smaller opening. By creating conical openings wherein the smaller end of the cone has a diameter of less than 6 microns it is possible to produce particles which have a diameter of less than 12 microns and it is also possible to force the formulation through the pores using a pressure of less than 500 psi. The small end of the conical opening preferably has a diameter of less than 3 microns for systemic delivery and less than 5 microns for pulmonary delivery and the pressure used for forcing formulation through the pores is preferable less than 350 psi.
When small aerosolized particles are forced into the air, the particles encounter substantial frictional resistance. This may cause particles to slow down more quickly than desired and may result in particles colliding into each other and combining, which is undesirable with respect to maintaining the preferred particle size distribution within the aerosol. In order to aid in avoiding the particle collision problem, it is possible to include a means by which air flow and the flexible membrane 3 prevent collisions. Specifically, the patient inhales thereby creating an air flow toward the patient over the protruding membrane 3. The air flow carries the formed particles along and aids in preventing their collision with each other. The shape of the container opening, the shape of the membrane covering that opening, as well as the positioning and angling of the flow of air through the channel 11 relative to the direction of formulation exiting the pores of the membrane 3 can be designed to aid in preventing particle collision. It is desirable to shape the opening and matching membrane so as to minimize the distance between any edge of the opening and the center of the opening. Accordingly, it is not desirable to form a circular opening which would maximize the distance between the outer edges of the circle and the center of the circle, whereas it is desirable to form an elongated narrow rectangular opening covered by a rigid membrane 80 as shown in
Operation of the Device 40
The device of
Microprocessor 26 of
The microprocessor 26 of the present invention, along with its associated peripheral devices, can be programmed so as to prevent triggering the actuation mechanism 28 more than a given number of times within a given period of time. This feature makes it possible to prevent overdosing the patient. The overdose prevention feature can be particularly designed with each individual patient in mind or designed with particular groups of patients in mind. For example, the microprocessor can be programmed so as to prevent the release of more than approximately 30 units of insulin per day when the patient is normally dosed with approximately 25 units of insulin drug per day. The device can be designed to switch off this lock-out function so that insulin can be delivered in an emergency situation.
The device can be used as a sensor alone. More specifically, the insulin can be inhaled from a separate device such as from a dry powder inhaler. Thereafter, the sensor portion of the device is made use of in order to perform the inhale-exhale maneuver of the invention. The inhale-exhale maneuver of the invention can be performed a plurality of times at different timed intervals after the delivery of aerosolized insulin. The inhale-exhale maneuver can be carried out at anytime after delivery as needed by the patient to reduce glucose levels. In one embodiment the inhale-exhale maneuver is performed at 20 minutes and again at 40 minutes after aerosolized delivery of insulin. However, the maneuver can be performed at 1 minute intervals, 5 minute intervals, 10 minute intervals, 20 minute intervals, or 30 minute intervals after delivery of an aerosolized dose of insulin.
The microprocessor 26 of the invention can be connected to external devices permitting external information to be transferred into the microprocessor of the invention and stored within the non-volatile read/write memory available-to the microprocessor. The microprocessor of the invention can then change its drug delivery behavior based on this information transferred from external devices. All of the features of the invention may be provided in a portable, programmable, battery-powered, hand-held device for patient use which has a size which compares favorably with existing metered dose inhaler devices.
The microprocessor 26 of the present invention is programmed so as to allow for monitoring and recording data from the inspiratory flow monitor without delivering drug. This is done in order to characterize the patient's inspiratory flow profile in a given number of monitoring events, which monitoring events preferably occur prior to dosing events. After carrying out a monitoring event, the preferred point within the inspiratory cycle for drug delivery can be calculated. This calculated point is a function of measured inspiratory flow rate as well as calculated cumulative inspiratory flow volume. This information is stored and used to allow activation of the electronic actuation means when the inhalation cycle is repeated during the dosing event.
Treatment Via Insulin Analogs
The methodologies of the present invention can be carried out using any type of insulin, although they are preferably carried out using recombinantly produced human insulin. Insulin extracted from animal sources such as bovine or porcine sources can be used. More recently, insulin analogs have been developed. More specifically, novel peptides have been developed wherein the amino acid sequence of the peptides is substantially the same as the amino acid sequence of naturally occurring human insulin but for small changes substituting one amino acid for another. These small changes can have important physiological effects with respect to the treatment of diabetes.
Other general types of insulin analogs are presently used. One type of new analog is sold by Lilly under the name insulin lispro and this analog is absorbed faster after subcutaneous injection. Another type of insulin analog is referred to as superactive insulin. In general, superactive insulin has increased activity over natural human insulin. Accordingly, such insulin can be administered in substantially smaller amounts while obtaining substantially the same effect with respect to reducing serum glucose levels. Another general type of analog is referred to as hepatospecific insulin. Heptatospecific insulin analogs are more active in the liver than in adipose tissue and offer several advantages over currently available insulin therapy. Hepatospecific analogs provide preferential hepatic uptake during peripheral subcutaneous administration, thereby mimicking, more closely, the metabolic balance between the liver and the peripheral tissues. Obtaining the correct metabolic balance is an important part of proper treatment of diabetics and administration via the intrapulmonary route should provide advantages over intermuscular injection with respect to obtaining such a balance. It maybe desirable to include mixtures of conventional insulin with insulin lispro or with insulin which is hepatospecific and/or with superactive insulin analogs. Hepatospecific analogs are disclosed and described within published PCT application WO90/12814, published Nov. 1, 1990, which application is incorporated herein by reference for its disclosure of such hepatospecific insulin analogs and in order to disclose other information cited within the other publications referred to within WO90/12814.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 074,558 discloses a superactive human insulin analog, [10-Aspartic Acid-B] human insulin, which has increased activity over natural human insulin. Specifically, [10-Aspartic Acid-B] human insulin was determined to be 4 to 5 times more potent than natural insulins. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 273,957 and International Application Serial No. PCT/US88/02289 disclose other superactive insulin analogs, despentapeptide (B26-B30)-[AspB10, TyrB25-α-carboxamide] human insulin, (B26-B30)-[GluB10, TyrB25-α-carboxamide] human insulin, and further insulin analogs of the formula des(B26-B30)-[X.B10, TyrB25-α-carboxamide] human insulin, in which X is a residue substituted at position 10 of the B chain. These insulin analogs have potencies anywhere from 11 to 20 times that of natural human insulin. All of the above-described insulin analogs involve amino acid substitutions along the A or B chains of natural human insulin, which increase the potency of the compound or change other properties of the compound.
Other than insulin lispro, the insulin analogs are not presently used for the treatment of patients on a commercial scale. However, insulin lispro and other insulin analogs being developed could be used with the present invention in that the present invention can be used to provide variable dosing in response to currently measured serum glucose levels. Further, since many insulin analogs are more potent than conventional insulin, their delivery via the intrapulmonary route is particularly convenient.
Method of Administration
The effect on repeatability of dosing due to the total inhaled volume is dramatically shown within
Specifically,
The difference between the serum insulin profile obtained depends on whether the patient delivers a high volume maneuver or a low volume maneuver when inhaling insulin. Understanding that this difference exists and accounting for such is important in order to obtain repeatable doses. Using the present invention it is possible to measure the total volume of air inhaled. The patient is instructed specifically to inhale maximally, i.e., continue inhaling to the maximum extent after drug is administered. The patient will always be on the high volume curve and the amount of insulin being delivered to the patient can be readily determined. It is also possible to instruct the patient to inhale to a given point after which the device is set to prevent further inhalation. This would place the patient on the low volume curve as per the figures. Although this would be less efficient the repeatability of dosing could be obtained.
Another advantage of the present invention is dramatically shown within
The method of the invention involves the release of a liquid, flowable insulin formulation from individual disposable containers which may be interconnected in a package. This is desirable in that the liquid, flowable drug is packaged under a sterile environment and therefore does not require and preferably does not include additional materials such as antifungal, bacteriostatics, and preservatives which would normally be required in a liquid formulation if the formulation was to be opened, exposed to air, closed and later used again. A new container and membrane are used for each release of drug. Thus, the membrane and container are disposable thereby preventing clogging of pores which takes place with reuse. In order to prevent clogging it is preferable to use a prefilter. The prefilter has a much higher porosity than the porous membrane nozzle but includes a much smaller hole. Thus, the prefilter will filter out any particles within the formulation but allow the formulation to move freely through the filter. A container with a prefilter included therein is disclosed within U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/804,041 filed Feb. 24, 1997 which application is incorporated herein by reference to disclose containers and specifically the prefilter used in connection with such containers. When administering drug using the inhalation device of the present invention, the entire dosing event can involve the administration of anywhere from 10 .mu.l to 10 ml of drug formulation, but more preferably involves the administration of approximately 50 .mu.l to 1,000 .mu.l of drug formulation. Very small amounts of drug (e.g., nanogram amounts) may be dissolved or dispersed within a pharmaceutically acceptable, liquid, excipient material to provide a liquid, flowable formulation which can be readily aerosolized. The container will include the formulation having insulin therein in an amount of about 0.5 unit to 5 units, more preferably about 1 unit. The large variation in the amounts which might be delivered are due to different delivery efficiencies for different devices, formulations and different patients needs.
The entire dosing event may involve several inhalations by the patient with each of the inhalations being provided with drug from the device. For example, the device can be programmed so as to release the contents of a single container or to move from one container to the next on a package of interconnected containers. Delivering smaller amounts from several containers can have advantages. Since only small amounts are delivered from each container and with each inhalation, even a complete failure to deliver drug with a given inhalation is not of great significance and will not seriously disturb the reproducibility of the dosing event. Further, since relatively small amounts are delivered with each inhalation, the patient can safely administer a few additional units of insulin without fear of overdosing.
In addition to drug potency and delivery efficiency, drug sensitivity must be taken into consideration. The present invention makes it possible to vary dosing over time if sensitivity changes and/or if user compliance and/or lung efficiency changes over time.
Based on the above, it will be understood that the dosing or amount of insulin actually released from the device can be changed based on the most immediately prior monitoring event wherein the inspiratory flow of a patient's inhalation is measured.
One of the important features and advantages of the present invention is that the microprocessor can be programmed to take a number of different criteria into consideration with respect to dosing times. For example, the microprocessor can be programmed so as to include a minimum time interval between doses i.e. after a given delivery another dose cannot be delivered until a given period of time has passed. Secondly, the timing of the device can be programmed so that it is not possible to exceed the administration of a set maximum amount of drug within a given time. For example, the device could be programmed to prevent dispersing more than ten units of insulin within one hour for a patient with low insulin requirements, or more for a patient requiring a large dose of insulin. More importantly, the device can be programmed to take both criteria into consideration. Thus, the device can be programmed to include a minimum time interval between doses and a maximum amount of drug to be released within a given time period. For example, the microprocessor could be programmed to allow the release of a maximum of ten units of insulin during an hour which could only be released in amounts of one unit with each release being separated by a minimum of five minutes.
The dosing program can be designed with some flexibility. For example, if the patient normally requires 25 units per day of insulin, the microprocessor can be programmed to provide a warning after 25 units have been administered within a given day and to continue the warning thereafter to alert the user of possible overdoses. By providing a warning and not a lock-out, the device allows for the patient to administer additional insulin, if needed, due to a decreased lung function, a different diet, and/or account for misdelivery of insulin such as due to coughing or sneezing during an attempted delivery.
The ability to prevent overdosing is a characteristic of the device due to the ability of the device to monitor the amount of insulin released and calculate the approximate amount of insulin delivered to the patient based on monitoring a variety of lung function parameters. The ability of the present device to prevent overdosing is not merely a monitoring system which prevents further manual actuation of a button. As indicated above, the device used in connection with the present invention is not manually actuated, but is fired in response to an electrical signal received from a microprocessor (which received data from a monitoring device such as a device which monitors inspiratory flow) and allows the actuation of the device upon achieving an optimal point in a inspiratory cycle. When using the present invention, each actuation of the device will administer drug to the patient in that the device is fired in response to patient inhalation. More specifically, the preferred embodiment of the device does not allow for the release of insulin merely by the manual actuation of a button to fire a burst of insulin into the air or a container.
A variety of different embodiments of the dispersion device of the invention are contemplated. In accordance with one embodiment it is necessary to carry out manual cocking of the device. This means that energy is stored such as by retracting a spring so that, for example, a piston can be positioned below the drug containing container. In a similar manner a piston connected to a spring can be withdrawn so that when it is released it will force air through the air dispersion vents. Automatic cocking of forced storing systems for both the drug formulation and the air flow may be separate or in one unit. Further, one may be manual whereas the other may be done automatically. In accordance with one embodiment the device is cocked manually but fired automatically and electronically based on monitoring the patients inspiratory flow. The formulation may be physically moved through the porous membrane in a variety of different ways. Formulation may be forced through the membrane by a piston or, without applying force to the formulation, the membrane being vibrated at frequencies sufficient to create an aerosol. A combination of forced extrusion and vibration could be used. As indicated above, the amount of force applied can be varied such as by cocking the spring to a greater extent to apply greater force. Applying less force will cause the piston to expel only a portion of the container contents through the porous membrane.
The microprocessor 26 of the present invention preferably includes a timing device. The timing device can be electrically connected with visual display signals as well as audio alarm signals. Although insulin is generally administered as needed the timing device and microprocessor can be programmed so as to allow for a visual or audio signal to be sent to the patient at times when the patient would be normally expected to administer insulin. In addition to indicating the time of administration (preferably by audio signal), the device can indicate the amount of insulin which should be administered by providing a visual display. For example, the audio alarm could sound alerting the patient that insulin should be administered. At the same time, the visual display could indicate “one dosage unit” as the amount of drug (number of containers) to be administered. At this point, a monitoring event could take place. After completion of the monitoring event, administration would proceed and the visual display would continually indicate the remaining amount of insulin which should be administered. After the predetermined dose (indicated number of containers) had been administered, the visual display would indicate that the dosing event had ended. If the patient did not complete the dosing event by administering the stated amount of drug, the patient would be reminded of such by the initiation of another audio signal, followed by a visual display instructing the patient to continue administration.
Additional information regarding dosing insulin can be found within Harrison's—Principles of Internal Medicine (most recent edition) and the Drug Evaluation Manual, 1993 (AMA-Division of Drugs and Toxicology), both of which are published by McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, incorporated herein by reference to disclose conventional information regarding dosing of insulin.
Repeatable Dosing
The device 40 schematically shown within
The microprocessor of the present invention can be programmed to release drug based on all or any of the following parameters:
(1) The device should be programmed to measure total exhaled and inhaled volume of the patient. After determining the patient's total lung volume the device should be set to signal the patient to continue inhaling to the same extent with each drug delivery and preferably they should be signaled to continue inhaling to the maximum extent in order to achieve both maximum efficiency and repeatability of dosage. It is noted that efficiency is sacrificed to some extent to ensure maximum repeatability of dosing.
(2) Delivery should be at an inspiratory flow rate inside a range of about 0.10 to about 2.0 liters per second (efficiency can be obtained by delivering at a flow rate in a range of 0.2 to about 1.8 liters per second and more preferably 0.15 to 1.7 liters per second). Repeatability of the delivery is obtained by releasing at substantially the same inspiratory flow rate at each drug release. Simultaneously, delivery should be at a point within a patient's inspiratory volume of about 0.05 to about 2.0 liters (further efficiency of delivery can be obtained by delivering within a range of 0.15 to 0.8 liters and more preferably 0.15 to about 0.4 liters). Repeatability of delivery is obtained by delivering at the same inspiratory volume at each release of drug. For the present invention it should be noted that the total inhaled volume is different from the volume set for the firing point. As indicated here the drug should be released to the patient when the volume is preferably in a range of 0.15 to about 0.4 liters. However, after the drug is released at this volume point the patient should continue to inhale to a maximum extent, e.g., inhaled a total of about 4 liters in order to improve efficiency and repeatability of dosage.
(3) Delivery is improved by providing a system which creates particles for systemic delivery wherein the particles are in the range of about 0.5 to about 12.0 microns, preferably 0.5 to 6 microns and more preferably 0.5 to about 3 microns.
(4) It is desirable to have obtained a concentration of the drug in the carrier in the range of from about 0.01 to about 12.5% preferably 0.1 to 10%. By maintaining the concentration of drug to carrier in this range it is possible to create particles which are somewhat larger than would be desirable for delivery but to reduce those particles in size by evaporation of carrier.
(5) Air drawn into the flow path of the aerosolized particles can be heated by adding energy to each 10 .mu.l of formulation-in an amount of about 20 Joules to 100 Joules, more preferably 20 Joules to 50 Joules. The heated air aids in reducing the effect of humidity and evaporates carrier away from the particles thereby providing smaller particles for inhalation.
(6) Air is added to the aerosolized formulation by the patient drawing air into the aerosolized mist in an amount of about 50 milliliters to 2 liters per 10 microliters of aerosol formulation.
(7) Vibration may be created on the porous membrane in an amount 575 to 32,000, preferably 1,000 to 17,000 and more preferably 2,000 to 4,200 kilohertz.
(8) The pore size of a membrane is regulated within a range of 0.25 to about 6.0 microns, preferably 0.5 to 3 microns and more preferably 1 to 2 microns. This size refers to the diameter of the pore through which the formulation exits the membrane. The diameter of the opening into which the formulation flows may be 2 to 20 times that size in diameter thereby providing a conical configuration.
(9) The viscosity of the formulation and the membrane porosity affect the amount of pressure which needs to be applied to force the formulation through the pores over a given period of time and the viscosity should be within the range of 25% to 1,000% the viscosity of water.
(10) The extrusion pressure is regulated within a range of 50 to 600 psi more preferably 100 to 750 psi. Lower pressures may be obtained by using the conical configuration for the pore size.
(11) The microprocessor should also be provided information regarding the ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure. The temperature is preferably close to room temperature i.e., within a range of 15.degree. C. to 30.degree. C. An atmospheric pressure is generally 1 atmosphere or slightly lower at higher altitudes, e.g., about 75% of 1 atmosphere.
(12) To provide for consistency in dosing the ratio of the carrier to drug should be maintained constant and more highly concentrated insulin formulation are more desirable.
(13) A desiccator is preferably used to remove water vapor from air drawn into the flow path by the patient.
(14) The pores are preferably placed in the porous membrane in an elongated oval or elongated rectangular configuration. By configuring the pores in this manner and drawing air perpendicularly over the narrower dimension of the configuration it is possible to reduce the amount of collisions between particles and thereby avoid particles collision resulting in accumulation.
(15) The thickness of the membrane is preferably regulated in the range of 5 to 200 microns or more preferably 10 to 50 microns. Thinner membranes are useful in that less pressure is required to force formulation through the membrane. The membrane has a tensile strength of 5,000 to 20,000, preferably 8,000 to 16,000 and more preferably 14,000 to 16,000 psi.
(16) The membrane is configured so as to have a convex configuration which protrudes into faster moving air created by the patient's inhalation or is designed to be flexible so that it will assume a convex configuration when formulation is forced through the membrane.
(17) After the microprocessor is provided information with respect to above parameters or measurements a drug release point is chosen the microprocessor will continually return to substantially the same firing point at each drug delivery so as to obtain repeatability of dosing.
After drug has been delivered it is possible to discontinue any readings with respect to flow and/or volume. However, it is preferable to continue readings with respect to both criteria after drug has been released. By continuing the readings the adequacy of this patient's particular drug delivery maneuver can be determined. All of the events are recorded by the microprocessor. The recorded information can be provided to the caregiver for analysis. For example, the caregiver can determine if the patient correctly carried out the inhalation maneuver in order to correctly delivery drug and can determine if the patient's inhalation profile is effected by the drug.
Monitoring Diabetic Control
All methods of treating diabetes involve measuring glucose levels in some manner. Such measurements are necessary in order to titrate proper dosing and avoid the over-administration of insulin which can result in fatal hypoglycemia. Measurements of urine glucose alone are insufficient to assess diabetic control and bring mean plasma glucose values into a near normal range since the during will be free of glucose when the plasma concentration is relatively normal. For this reason, “home glucose monitoring” is used in those patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple subcutaneous injection (MSI) techniques. Such monitoring requires capillary blood which can be obtained in a substantially painless manner using a small spring-triggered device referred to as Autolet.TM. produced by Ulstr Scientific Incorporated which device is equipped with small disposable lancelets. The amount of glucose is analyzed using chemically impregnated strips which are read in a commercially available reflectance meter. One commercially available strip is referred to as Chemstrip bG (produced by Bio-Dynamics) The Chemstrip Bg can provide satisfactory values by visual inspection utilizing a dual-color scale, thus eliminating the need for a reflectance meter. Frequent measurement of the plasma glucose (a fairly standard program utilizes seven or eight assays over a 24-hour period) allows a reasonable assessment of mean plasma glucose levels during the day and guides adjustment of insulin dosage.
The methodology of the present invention is preferably utilized in combination with a closely controlled means of monitoring serum glucose levels. More specifically, the drug delivery device of the invention is used to administer doses of insulin via the intrapulmonary route. The doses may be administered in somewhat smaller amounts than are generally administered by injection. The amount of insulin administered can be readily adjusted in that smaller amounts are generally administered using the intrapulmonary delivery methodology of the present invention.
After an aerosolized dose of insulin has been produced and inhaled into the patient's lungs the inhale-exhale maneuver can be performed at any time. Performing the maneuver provides advantages in that it increases the rate at which the insulin enters the circulatory system and thereby makes it possible to more accurately control the amount of additional insulin the patient might need in order to properly adjust the glucose level. If the maneuver is to be performed a greater amount of time must pass until the patient is sure that sufficient insulin has not already been absorbed. Regardless of the manner by which the insulin is administered i.e., by injection or inhalation there is some lag time between the administration of a dose of insulin and its effect on the serum glucose level. Thus, regardless of the means of administration and even when the inhale-exhale maneuver is performed some time must be allowed to pass for the glucose level to decrease prior to the administration of additional insulin in order to avoid overdosing. The use of the inhale-exhale maneuver decreases the “lag” time which is already decreased due to intrapulmonary administration as compared to subcutaneous injections. Further, as indicated above, the microprocessor can be programmed to prevent overdoses.
During the day, as insulin is administered, serum glucose levels are frequently monitored. The amount of insulin administered can be dosed based on the monitored serum glucose levels, i.e., as glucose levels increase, the amount of insulin can be increased, and as glucose levels are seen to decrease, the dosing of insulin can be decreased.
Based on the information disclosed herein in combination with what is known about insulin dosing and serum glucose levels, computer readable programs can be readily developed which can be used in connection with the insulin delivery device of the present invention. More specifically, the microprocessor can be programmed so as to deliver precise doses of insulin which correspond to the particular needs of the patient based on seru glucose monitoring information which is supplied to the microprocessor of the device of the invention. Further, the dosing information contained within the microprocessor of the device of the invention can be fed to a separate computer and/or serum glucose monitoring device (preferably portable) in order to calculate the best treatment and dosing schedule for the particular patient.
Insulin Containing Formulations
A variety of different insulin containing formulations can be used with the present invention. The active ingredient within such formulations is insulin which is preferably recombinantly produced human insulin but, as indicated above, may include insulin extracted from animal sources. Further, the insulin which has been recombinantly produced. Although the insulin and/or analog is generally present by itself as the sole active ingredient, the insulin may be present with an additional active ingredient such as a sulfonylurea. However, such sulfonylureas are generally administered separately in order to more closely control dosing and serum glucose levels.
The present invention provides a great deal of flexibility with respect to the types of insulin to be administered. For example, a container can include insulin by itself or insulin in combination with an insulin analog of any type or combinations of different insulin analogs. Further, a package can be created wherein individual containers include different formulations wherein the formulations are designed to achieve a particular effect e.g., fast acting insulin or quick and careful monitoring can determine the preferred insulin dosing protocol to be followed for the particular patient.
Regardless of the active ingredient, there are several basic types of insulin formulations which can be used in connection with the present invention. All of the formulations include insulin, preferably with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier suitable for intrapulmonary administration.
The insulin may be provided as a dry powder by itself, and in accordance with another formulation, the insulin or active ingredient is provided in a solution formulation. The dry powder could be directly inhaled by allowing inhalation only at the same measured inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory volume for each delivery. However, the powder is preferably dissolved in an aqueous solvent to create a solution which is moved through a porous membrane to create an aerosol for inhalation.
Any formulation which makes it possible to produce aerosolized forms of insulin which can be inhaled and delivered to a patient via the intrapulmonary route can be used in connection with the present invention. Specific information regarding formulations (which can be used in connection with aerosolized delivery services) are described within Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, A. R. Gennaro editor (latest edition) Mack Publishing Company. Regarding insulin formulations, it is also useful to note Sciarra et al. [Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1979].
The insulin is preferably included in a solution such as the type of solution which is made commercially available for injection and/or other solutions which are more acceptable for intrapulmonary delivery. When preparing preferred formulations of the invention which provide for the insulin, excipient and solvent, any pharmaceutically acceptable excipient may be used provided it is not toxic in the respiratory tract.
Formulations include insulin dry powder by itself and/or with an excipient. When such a formulation is used, it may be used in combination with a gas propellant which gas propellant is released over a predetermined amount of dried powder which is forced into the air and inhaled by the patient. It is also possible to design the device so that a predetermined amount of dry powder is placed behind a gate. The gate is opened in the same manner as the valve is released so that the same inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory volume is repeatedly obtained. Thereafter, the dry powder is inhaled by the patient and the insulin is delivered. When a solution is used the device of
Formulations of the invention can include liposomes containing insulin in combination with an amount of alveolar surfactant protein effective to enhance the transport of the liposomes across the pulmonary surface and into the circulatory system of the patient. Such liposomes and formulations containing such are disclosed within U.S. Pat. No. 5,006,343, issued Apr. 9, 1991, which is incorporated herein by reference to disclose liposomes and formulations of liposomes used in intrapulmonary delivery. The formulations and methodology disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,006,343 can be adapted for the application of insulin and included within the delivery device of the present invention in order to provide for effective treatments of diabetic patients.
The terms “insulin” and “insulin analog” have been defined above. With respect to both terms, applicant points out that a variety of commercial insulin formulations are available. Rapidly acting preparations are always indicated in diabetic emergencies and in CSII and MSI programs. Intermediate preparations are used in conventional and MSI regimens. It is not possible to delineate precisely the biologic responses to the various preparations because peak effects and duration vary from patient to patient and depend not only on route of administration but on dose. The various insulins are available as rapid (regular, semilente), intermediate (NPH, lente, globin), and long-acing (PZI, ultralente) preparations, although not all manufacturers offer all varieties. Lente and NPH insulin are used in most conventional therapy and are roughly equivalent in biologic effects, although lente appears to be slightly more immunogenic and to mix less well with regular insulin than does NPH.
The methodology of the invention may be carried out using a portable, hand-held, battery-powered device which uses a microprocessor component as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,404,871, issued Apr. 11, 1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,336, issued Sep. 12, 1995 both of which are incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with another system the methodology of the invention could be carried out using the device, dosage units and system disclosed in U.S. Ser. No. 94/05825 with modifications as described herein. Insulin (which is preferably recombinant insulin) is included in an aqueous formulation which is aerosolized by moving the formulation through a flexible porous membrane. Alternatively, the methodology of the invention could be carried out using a mechanical (non-electronic) device. Those skilled in the art recognized that various components can be mechanical set to actuate at a given inspiratory flow rate (e.g. a spring biased valve) and at a given volume (e.g. a spinable flywheel which rotates a given amount per a given volume).
The insulin which is released to the patient may be in a variety of different forms. For example, the insulin may be an aqueous solution of drug, i.e., drug dissolved in water and formed into small particles to create an aerosol which is delivered to the patient. Alternatively, the drug may be in a solution or a suspension wherein a low-boiling point propellant is used as a carrier fluid. In yet another embodiment the insulin may be in the form of a dry powder which is intermixed with an airflow in order to provided for delivery of drug to the patient. Regardless of the type of drug or the form of the drug formulation, it is preferable to create drug particles having a size in the range of about 0.5 to 12 microns. By creating drug particles which have a relatively narrow range of size, it is possible to further increase the efficiency of the drug delivery system and improve the repeatability of the dosing. Thus, it is preferable that the particles not only have a size in the range of 0.5 to 12 microns but that the mean particle size be within a narrow range so that 80% or more of the particles being delivered to a patient have a particle diameter which is within .+−.20% of the average particle size, preferably .+−.10% and more preferably .+−.5% of the average particle size.
The velocity at which the aerosolized drug is released to the patient is also important in terms of obtaining a high degree of repeatability in dosing and providing for a high percentage of drug being delivered to the patient's lungs. Most preferably, the drug is released from a container in a direction which is normal to the patient's airflow. Accordingly, the drug in a container 1 as shown in
An aerosol may be created by forcing drug through pores of a membrane which pores have a size in the range of about 0.25 to 6 microns preferably 0.5 to 3.0 microns. When the pores have this size the particles which escape through the pores to create the aerosol will have a diameter about twice the diameter of the pore opening from which the formulation exists. However, the particle size can be substantially reduced by adding heat to the air around the particles and cause evaporation of carrier. Drug particles may be released with an air flow intended to keep the particles within this size range. The creation of small particles may be facilitated by the use of the vibration device which provides a vibration frequency in the range of about 800 to about 4000 kilohertz. Those skilled in the art will recognize that some adjustments can be made in the parameters such as the size of the pores from which drug is released, vibration frequency and amplitude, pressure, and other parameters based on the concentration, density, viscosity and surface tension of the formulation keeping in mind that the object is to provide aerosolized particles having a diameter in the range of about 0.5 to 12 microns.
The drug formulation may be a low viscosity liquid formulation. The viscosity of the drug by itself or in combination with a carrier is not of particular importance except to note that the formulation must have characteristics such that it can be forced out of openings of the flexible or convex membrane to form an aerosol, e.g., using 20 to 400 psi to form an aerosol preferably having a particle size in the range of about 0.5 to 6.0 microns.
Drug may be stored in and/or released from a container of any desired size. In most cases the size of the container is not directly related to the amount of drug being delivered in that most formulations include relatively large amounts of excipient material e.g. water or a saline solution. Accordingly, a given size container could include a wide range of different doses by varying drug concentration.
Drug containers may include indices which may be electronic and may be connected to a power source such as a battery. When the indices are in the form of visually perceivable numbers, letters or any type of symbol capable of conveying information to the patient. Alternatively, the indices may be connected to a power source such as a battery when the indices are in the form of magnetically, optically or electronically recorded information which can be read by a drug dispensing device which in turn provides visual or audio information to the user. The indices can be designed for any desired purpose but in general provides specific information relating to the day and/or time which the drug within a container should be administered to the patient. Such indices may record, store and transfer information to a drug dispensing device regarding the number of doses remaining in the container. The containers may include labeling which can be in any format and could include days of the month or other symbols or numbers in any variation or language.
In addition to disclosing specific information regarding the day and time for drug delivery the indices could provide more detailed information such as the amount of insulin dispensed from each container which might be particularly useful if the containers included different amounts of insulin. Further, magnetic, optical and/or electronic indices could have new information recorded onto them which information could be placed there by the drug dispensing device. For example, a magnetic recording means could receive information from the drug dispensing device indicating the precise time which the insulin was actually administered to the patient. In addition to recording the time of delivery the device could monitor the expected efficacy of the delivery based on factors such as the inspiratory flow rate which occurred following the initial release of insulin. The information recorded could then be read by a separate device, interpreted by the care-give and used to determine the usefulness of the present treatment methodology. For example, if the glucose levels of the patient did not appear to be responding well but the recorded information indicating that the patient had taken the drug at the wrong time or that the patient had misdelivered drug by changing inspiratory flow rate after initial release it might be determined that further education in patient use of the device was needed but that the present dosing methodology might well be useful. However, if the recordings indicated that the patient had delivered the aerosolized insulin using the proper techniques and still not obtained the correct results (e.g. acceptable glucose levels) another dosing methodology might be recommended. The method of treating Diabetes Mellitus may be carried out using a hand-held, portable device comprised of (a) a device for holding a disposable package comprised of at least one but preferably a number of drug containers, (b) a propellant or a mechanical mechanism for moving the contents of a container through a porous membrane (c) a monitor for analyzing the inspiratory flow, rate and volume of a patient, and (d) a switch for automatically releasing or firing the mechanical means after the inspiratory flow and/or volume reaches a threshold level. The device may also include a transport mechanism to more the package from one container to the next with each container and its porous membrane being disposed of after use. The entire device is self-contained, light weight (less than 1 kg preferably less than 0.5 kg loaded) and portable.
The device may include a mouth piece at the end of the flow path, and the patient inhales from the mouth piece which causes an inspiratory flow to be measured within the flow path which path may be in a non-linear flow-pressure relationship. This inspiratory flow causes an air flow transducer to generate a signal. This signal is conveyed to a microprocessor which is able to convert, continuously, the signal from the transducer in the inspiratory flow path to a flow rate in liters per minute. The microprocessor can further integrate this continuous air flow rate signal into a representation of cumulative inspiratory volume. At an appropriate point in the inspiratory cycle, the microprocessor can send a signal to an actuation means (and/or a vibration device below the resonance cavity) when the actuation means is signaled, it causes the mechanical means (by pressure and/or vibration) to move drug from a container on the package into the inspiratory flow path of the device and ultimately into the patient's lungs. After being released, the drug and carrier will pass through a porous membrane, which can be vibrated to aerosolize the formulation and thereafter the lungs of the patient.
The device preferably includes a means for recording a characterization of the inspiratory flow profile for the patient which is possible by including a microprocessor in combination with a read/write memory means and a flow measurement transducer. By using such devices, it is possible to change the firing threshold at any time in response to an analysis of the patient's inspiratory flow profile, and it is also possible to record drug dosing events over time. In a particularly preferred embodiment the characterization of the inspiratory flow can be recorded onto a recording means on the disposable package.
The details of a drug delivery device which includes a microprocessor and pressure transducer of the type which may be used in connection with the present invention are described and disclosed within U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,404,871, issued Apr. 11, 1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,336, issued Sep. 12, 1995 incorporated in their entirety herein by reference, and specifically incorporated in order to describe and disclose the microprocessor and program technology used therewith. The pre-programmed information is contained within a nonvolatile memory which can be modified via an external device. In another embodiment, this pre-programmed information is contained within a “read only” memory which can be unplugged from the device and replaced with another memory unit containing different programming information. In yet another embodiment, a microprocessor, containing read only memory which in turn contains the pre-programmed information, is plugged into the device. For each of these embodiments, changing the programming of the memory device readable by a microprocessor will radically change the behavior of the device by causing the microprocessor to be programmed in a different manner. This is done to accommodate different insulin formulation and for different types of treatment, e.g., patients with different types of diabetes.
After dosing a patient with insulin it is desirable to measure glucose (invasively or non-invasively) and make adjustments as needed to obtain the desired glucose level. In accordance with all methods the patient does not push a button to release drug. The drug is released automatically by signals from the microprocessor using measurements obtained.
The doses administered are based on an assumption that when interpulmonary delivery methodology is used the efficiency of the delivery is at a known percent amount, e.g., 20% to 50% or more approximately and adjustments in the amount released in order to take into account the efficiency of the device. The differential between the amount of insulin actually released from the device and the amount actually delivered to the patient varies due to a number of factors. In general, devices used with the present invention can have an efficiency as low as 10% and as high as 50% or more meaning that as little as 10% of the released insulin may actually reach the circulatory system of the patient and as much as 50% or more might be delivered. The efficiency of the delivery will vary somewhat from patient to patient and must be taken into account when programming the device for the release of insulin. In general, a conventional metered (propellant-driven) dose inhaling device is about 10% efficient.
One of the important features and advantages of the present invention is that the microprocessor can be programmed to take a variety of different criteria into consideration with respect to dosing-times. Specifically, the microprocessor can be programmed so as to include a minimum time interval between doses i.e. after a given delivery another dose cannot be delivered until a given period of time has passed. Secondly, the timing of the device can be programmed so that it is not possible to exceed the administration of a set maximum amount of insulin within a given time. For example, the device could be programmed to prevent dispersing more than 5 units of insulin within one hour. More importantly, the device can be programmed to take both criteria into consideration. Thus, the device can be programmed to include a minimum time interval between doses and a maximum amount of insulin to be released within a given time period. For example, the microprocessor could be programmed to allow the release of a maximum of 5 units of insulin during an hour which could only be released in amounts of 1 unit with each release being separated by a minimum of five minutes.
Additional information regarding dosing with insulin via injection can be found within Harrison's—Principles of Internal Medicine (most recent edition) published by McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, incorporated herein by reference to disclose conventional information regarding dosing insulin via injection.
Another feature of the device is that it may be programmed to not release drug if it does not receive a signal transmitted to it by a transmitter worn by the intended user. Such a system improves the security of the device and prevents misuse by unauthorized users such as children.
The microprocessor of the invention can be connected to external devices permitting external information to be transferred into the microprocessor of the invention and stored within the non-volatile read/write memory available to the microprocessor. The microprocessor of the invention can then change its drug delivery behavior based on this information transferred from external devices such as a glucose monitoring device. All of the features of the invention are provided in a portable, programmable, battery-powered, hand-held device for patient use which has a size which compares favorably with existing metered dose inhaler devices.
Different mechanisms will be necessary in order to deliver different formulations, such as a dry powder without any propellant. A device could be readily designed so as to provide for the mechanical movement of a predetermined amount of dry powder to a given area. The dry powder would be concealed by a gate, which gate would be opened in the same manner described above, i.e., it would be opened when a predetermined flow rate level and cumulative volume have been achieved based on an earlier monitoring event. Patient inhalation or other source of energy such as from compressed gas or a mechanical device would then cause the dry powder to form a dry dust cloud and be inhaled.
In addition to monitoring glucose levels in order to determine proper insulin dosing, the microprocessor of the present invention is programmed so as to allow for monitoring and recording data from the inspiratory flow monitor without delivering drug. This is done in order to characterize the patient's inspiratory flow profile in a given number of monitoring events, which monitoring events preferably occur prior to dosing events. After carrying out a monitoring event, the preferred point within the inspiratory cycle for drug delivery can be calculated. This calculated point is a function of measured inspiratory flow rate as well as calculated cumulative inspiratory flow volume. This information is stored and used to allow activation of the valve when the inhalation cycle is repeated during the dosing event. Those skilled in the art will also readily recognize that different mechanisms will be necessary in order to deliver different formulations, such as a dry powder without any propellant. A device could be radially designed so as to provide for the mechanical movement of a predetermined amount of dry powder to a given area. The dry powder would be concealed by a gate, which gate would be opened in the same manner described above, i.e., it would be opened when a predetermined flow rate level and cumulative volume have been achieved based on an earlier monitoring event. Patient inhalation would then cause the dry powder to form a dry dust cloud and be inhaled. Dry powder can also be aerosolized by compressed gas, and a solution can be aerosolized by a compressed gas released in a similar manner and then inhaled.
Dual Compartment Container
The dual compartment container 70 of
The membrane 81 may be permanently convexed or may be flexible and convex outward when the formulation is forced through the membrane and will operate as per the container described in
The instant invention is shown herein in what is considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments. It is recognized, however, that departures may be made therefrom which are within the scope of the invention and that obvious modifications will occur to one skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure.
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/848,774, filed May 3, 2001, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/686,212, filed Oct. 10, 2000 now abandoned which is continuation of application Ser. No. 09/378,638, filed Aug. 20, 1999, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,167,880 on Jan. 2, 2001 which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/160,909, filed Sep. 25, 1998 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,941,240 on Aug. 24, 1999, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/846,243 filed Apr. 25, 1997 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,620 on Mar. 23, 1999, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/754,423 filed Nov. 22, 1996 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,250 on Apr. 28, 1998, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/549,343, filed on Oct. 27, 1995 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,378 on Jun. 29, 1999, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/331,056, filed on Oct. 28, 1994 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,581 on Sep. 30, 1997, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/011,281, filed on Jan. 29, 1993 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,838 on Nov. 15, 1994, each of which is incorporated herein by reference and to which is claimed priority under 35 USC § 120.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3362405 | Hazel | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3425600 | Abplanalp | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3540927 | Niimi et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3554768 | Feldman | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3561444 | Boucher | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3620776 | Mishkin et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3666496 | Honey et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3674901 | Shepherd et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3703173 | Dixon | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3764716 | Rainwater et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3812854 | Michaels et al. | May 1974 | A |
| 3921637 | Bennie et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3937668 | Zolle | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3964483 | Mathes | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3971852 | Brenner et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3991304 | Hillsman | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3991761 | Cocozza | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3994421 | Hansen | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4036223 | Obert | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4069819 | Valentini et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4098273 | Glenn | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4109019 | Moore | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4153689 | Hiral et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4206200 | Guthohrlein et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4211769 | Okada et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4249526 | Dean et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4253468 | Lehmbeck | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4294624 | Veltman | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4294829 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4338931 | Cavazza | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4361401 | Smith et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4423079 | Kline | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4446862 | Baum et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4452239 | Malem | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4484577 | Sackner et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4503035 | Pestka et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4533552 | Kawamata et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4534343 | Nowacki et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4559298 | Fahy | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4590206 | Forrester et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4599311 | Kawasaki | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4604847 | Moulding, Jr. et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4617272 | Kirkwond et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4624251 | Miller | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4627432 | Newell et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4635627 | Gam | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4649911 | Knight et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4659696 | Hiral et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4677975 | Edgar et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4686231 | Bender et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4698328 | Neer et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4719762 | Osabe | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4739754 | Shaner | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4778054 | Newell et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4790305 | Zoltan et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4796614 | Nowacki et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4806343 | Carpenter et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4807814 | Douche et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4811731 | Newell et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4819629 | Jhonson | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4820534 | Saleeb et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823784 | Bordoni et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4824938 | Koyama et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4830858 | Payne et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4833125 | Neer et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4855157 | Tashiro et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4857319 | Crowe et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4876241 | Feldman et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877989 | Drews et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4884565 | Cocozza | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4889114 | Kladders | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4891319 | Roser | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4895719 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4897353 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4907583 | Wetterlin et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4919962 | Arora et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4926852 | Zoltan et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4927763 | Sudoma et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4931361 | Baldeschwieler et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4942544 | McIntosh et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4946828 | Markussen | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4956295 | Sudoma | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4968607 | Dower et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4984158 | Hillsman | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4995385 | Valentin et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5006343 | Benson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011678 | Wang et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017372 | Hastings | May 1991 | A |
| 5026566 | Koser | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027806 | Zoltan et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5033463 | Cocozza | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5035237 | Newell et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5042975 | Chien et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5048514 | Ramella | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5049388 | Knight et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5081228 | Dower et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5093316 | Lezdey et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5098893 | Franks et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5099833 | Michaels | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5113855 | Newhouse | May 1992 | A |
| 5124162 | Boskovic et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5139016 | Waser | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5149543 | Cohen et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5149653 | Roser | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5161524 | Evans | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167506 | Kilis et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5180812 | Dower et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5186164 | Raghuprasad | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5192548 | Velasquez et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5200399 | Wettlaufer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5201308 | Newhouse | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5204108 | Illum | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206200 | Bush et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5230884 | Evans et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5253468 | Raymond | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254330 | Ganderton et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5260306 | Boardman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5284133 | Burns et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290765 | Wettlaufer et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295479 | Lankinen | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5302581 | Sarin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5309900 | Knoch et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5320094 | Laube et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5320714 | Brendel | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5331953 | Andersson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5349947 | Newhouse | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5354562 | Platz et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5354934 | Pitt et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5356635 | Raman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5363842 | Mischlevich et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364838 | Rubsamen | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5376359 | Johnson | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5376386 | Ganderton et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5384133 | Boyes et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394866 | Ritson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5404871 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5419315 | Rubsamen et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5447151 | Bruna et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450336 | Rubsamen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5458135 | Patton et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5482927 | Maniar et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5497944 | Weston et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5506203 | Backstrom et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509404 | Llyod et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5518998 | Backstrom et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522385 | Lloyd et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5558085 | Rubsamen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5619984 | Hodson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5643868 | Weiner et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5666948 | Matson | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672581 | Rubsamen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5743250 | Gonda et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5755221 | Bisgaard | May 1998 | A |
| 5763396 | Weiner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5843886 | Weiner et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5873358 | Gonda et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5884620 | Gonda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888477 | Gonda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5915378 | Lloyd et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5934272 | Lloyd et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941240 | Gonda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954049 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970973 | Gonda et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5997848 | Patton et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6012450 | Rubsamen | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012454 | Hadson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019968 | Platz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024090 | Gonda et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6051256 | Platz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6085753 | Gonda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6098615 | Lloyd et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099517 | Daugherty | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6123068 | Lloyd et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131567 | Gonda et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6167880 | Gonda et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192882 | Gonda | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6250298 | Gonda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6263872 | Schuster et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6402733 | Daugherty | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408854 | Gonda et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6427681 | Gonda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6431166 | Gonda et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6431167 | Gonda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6647987 | Gonda et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6688304 | Gonda et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6737045 | Patton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 7021309 | Gonda et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028686 | Gonda et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0186280 | Oct 1985 | EP |
| 0232235 | Aug 1987 | EP |
| 2104393 | Mar 1983 | GB |
| 2153081 | Aug 1985 | GB |
| 2 255918 | Nov 1992 | GB |
| 2256805 | Dec 1992 | GB |
| 9007351 | Jan 1990 | WO |
| 9012814 | Nov 1990 | WO |
| 9114468 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| 9207599 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| 9101868 | May 1992 | WO |
| 9209322 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| 9300951 | Jul 1992 | WO |
| 9201815 | Sep 1992 | WO |
| 9215353 | Sep 1992 | WO |
| 9312823 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| 9317728 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050274377 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09160909 | Sep 1998 | US |
| Child | 09378638 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09848774 | May 2001 | US |
| Child | 11130986 | US | |
| Parent | 09686212 | Oct 2000 | US |
| Child | 09848774 | US | |
| Parent | 09378638 | Aug 1999 | US |
| Child | 09686212 | US | |
| Parent | 08846243 | Apr 1997 | US |
| Child | 09160909 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 08754423 | Nov 1996 | US |
| Child | 08846243 | US | |
| Parent | 08549343 | Oct 1995 | US |
| Child | 08754423 | US | |
| Parent | 08331056 | Oct 1994 | US |
| Child | 08549343 | US | |
| Parent | 08011281 | Jan 1993 | US |
| Child | 08331056 | US |
