Method of treating waste-activated sludge using electroporation

Abstract

A system that allows the flexibility of primary and secondary treatment of municipal sludge, paper-pulp sludge, animal and plant waste, whereby the treatment thereof via electroporation may be used either as the primary dewatering treatment, secondary dewatering treatment, direct WAS-treatment, and combinations with other conventional dewatering techniques, in order to provide the municipal treatment plant, or the paper-pulp treatment plant, with the most cost-effective and efficient system as possible. The electroporated-treated sludge releases hitherto unreleased biosolids exiting from the PEF-electroporation system, which are returned to aeration tanks. The electroporation process causes the release of intracellular dissolved/organic matter, which is used as “food” for the bacteria of the aeration tanks.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] This is a continuation-in-part application of application serial No. 09/468,42.7, filed on Dec. 21, 1999.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] In applicant's copending application serial number, there is disclosed a system and method for dewatering and treating waste-activated sludge (WAS) emanating from municipal waste, or pulp-waste from a paper mill, as well as treating animal and plant waste. In that application, the method for breaking down the WAS is to subject the WAS to electroporation, which incorporates nonarcing, cyclical high voltages in the range of between 15 KV and 100 KV, which break down inter-cellular and intracellular molecular bonds, to thus release inter-cellular and intracellular water, whereby the WAS is rendered inactive and greatly reduced in mass.

[0003] In said above-noted copending application, the apparatus and method disclosed therein, while capable in certain circumstances of being a primary municipal-sludge treatment, its intended and main objective was to use it as a secondary treatment to previously-dewatered municipal waste sludge. It is the goal of the present invention to adapt the method and apparatus of said copending application serial No. 09/468,427 into a main, primary treatment of municipal waste sludge.

[0004] In a previous (Phase I) project, it has been demonstrated the laboratory feasibility of pulsed electric field (PEF) for disrupting the biomass in waste activated sludge (WAS) derived from municipal wastewater treatment. While there was no significant increase in the solids content of dewatered sludge, the quantity of WAS needing disposal was estimated to be significantly reduced.

[0005] Encouraged by the Phase I results, a pilot plant for testing at one or two wastewater treatment plants that generate WAS has been developed. It has been decided that a pulsed electric field (PEF) system that could handle 0.5 to 1.0 pgm WAS feed be designed. This requires an 8 kw power supply capable of generating 30 kV and pulse generator capable of handling 50 amp peak, current, bi-polar pulses, square wave, 10 μs pulse width, and 3000 pulses/second (pps).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0006] It is the primary objective of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for dewatering municipal waste sludge, paper-pulp waste sludge, animal and plant waste, using electroporation for the primary treatment of the sludge.

[0007] It is also a primary objective of the present to provide such a system that will allow flexibility as to the primary and secondary treatment of municipal sludge, paper-pulp sludge, animal and plant waste, whereby the treatment thereof via electroporation may be used either as the primary dewatering treatment, secondary dewatering treatment, direct WAS-treatment, and combinations with other conventional dewatering techniques, in order to provide the municipal treatment plant, or the paper-pulp treatment plant, with the most cost-effective and efficient system as possible.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

[0008] The invention will be more readily understood with reference to be accompanying drawings, wherein:

[0009] FIG. 1 is a schematic showing the electroporation system as used as a secondary dewatering treatment;

[0010] FIG. 2 is a schematic showing the electroporation system used in conjunction as a primary dewatering treatment in accordance with the present invention;

[0011] FIG. 3 is a schematic showing the electroporation sub-system for use in dewatering municipal, paper-puklp, animal and plant waste sludges; and

[0012] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the overall apparatus of the present invention incorporating the electroporation sub-system for use as a primary or secondary dewatering treatment;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0013] The original concept for the pulsed-electric filed (PEF) effect using electroporation was to dewater the reviously-dewatered sludge. However, additional PEF data on a paper plant sludge has indicated that the big PEF effect from electroporatior of WAS occurs at higher energy levels (e.g., 100 J/mL; or 400 k Wh/ton (DS) for feed at 6 percent solids), whereby cells are disrupted. The result is inactivation of cells, breakage of cells and release of some intracellular dissolved/organic matter and typically a worsening of flocculation and dewatering. Therefore, a more effective way of using this process is to recycle all of the PEF-treated sludge back to a aerobic bioreactor to utilize the sludge as food; that is, it has been discovered that the PEF-electroporation effect on disrupting the cellular units of the WAS has been to release intracellular dissolved/organic matter. This intracellular dissolved/organic matter is just the type of ideal “food” upon which the aerobic bioreactor flourishes. Thus, returning this released intracellular dissolved/organic matter back to the aerobic bioreactor will increase the BOD load on the bioreactor, and will thus reduce the quantity of WAS by up to about 50 percent. The flowsheet for this scenario is shown in FIG. 2. Thus, it is now practical to employ the PEF-electroporation system as not only a secondary system for treating previously-dewatered sludge, but also to employ it as a primary system, as described hereinbelow.

[0014] Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown the schematic for using the PEF-electroporation system as a secondary treatment for previously-dewatered sludge, as disclosed in Applicant's copending application serial No. 09/468,427. In FIG. 1, the wastewater is delivered to the primary treatment, aerobic-reactor tanks 10, and from to a secondary clarifier 12. From there, the WAS is delivered to the PEF-electroporation system 14 of the invention for deactivating the WAS to make it a Class “B” biomass for easier disposal. The biomass is then sent to a belt press 16 for further processing and disposal.

[0015] Referring now to FIG. 2, there is shown the flow chart of the present invention for employing the PEF-electroporation system as part of the primary treatment. In this system, the biosolids exiting from the PEF-electroporation system 14 are returned to the aeration tanks 10, since, as explained above, the PEF process causes the release of intracellular, dissolved organic matter, which is used as “food” for the bacteria of the aeration tanks. This “food” not only is further treated in the aeration tanks via aerobic digestion, but actually causes the aerobic digestion process in the aerobic tank itself to be accelerated for the same amount of oxygen supplied.

[0016] A practical problem with the system of FIG. 2 is that the PEF throughput needs to be of the same order of magnitude as the WAS disposal rate in order to see a noticeable effect of PEF on WAS reduction. For this reason a 1.8 ton (DS)/day PEF system has been chosen as a pilot plant. With such a system, a WAS reduction of 0.9 ton/day on a dry basis or 7.5 tons/day on a filter press cake (at 12 percent solids) basis may be achieved. In terms of thickened sludge (at 2 percent solids) basis, this translate to elimination of 45 tons/day needing to be flocculated and dewatered. This will require PEF treatment of 15 gpm WAS at 2 percent solids.

[0017] One way to reduce the cost of the pilot plant, which is driven by the PEF power supply and pulser cost, is to pre-thicken the WAS. Therefore, a 15 gpm rental centrifuge 18 is used for pilot testing. It is estimated that this will produce a 5 gpm feed for the PEF reactor at a solids content of 6 percent. Such a feed can be handled by a Moyno pump. The feed streams to the centrifuge and the PEF units are represented as Stream Nos. 10 and 11, respectively in FIG. 2. However, in practical application such as centrifuge may not be necessary.

Pef Power Supply and Pulser Design

[0018] The conceptual design of the power supply and the pulse generator (pulser) for the system of FIG. 2 is shown in FIG. 3. This figure shows four chambers 20 in series, although two chambers also can be used if the pulse rate is increased. The specifications for the two-chamber design are shown in Table 1. The design requires a 35 kW input power supply 22 (32 kW continuous output) delivering 30 kV. The pulse generator 24 is 200 amp maximum current and a pulse rate of 4,000 hz. (maximum).

TABLE 1
Pilot Plant PEF Power Supply, Reactor, and Pulser
Chambers
Gap Distance D (cm)              1.2
Chamber                          1
Number of chambers in use        2
Flow Conditions
Flow rate (ml/s)                 315
PEF Parameters
Voltage to apply (kV)            30
Rep-rate (pps)                   3342.254
Pulse duration (μs)              4
Physical Properties
Conductivity (S/m)               0.2
Density (g/cm3)                  1
Specific Heat ([J/(g · ° C.)]    4.18
Viscosity (Pa · s)               0.0100
Dosage Level
Electric Field Strength (kV/cm)  25
Total Treatment Time (μs)        80
Number of pulses per chamber     10
Temperature Change
Temperature increase per pair of chamber (° C.) 11.962
Related Information
Residence Time (s)               0.00299
Flow Speed (cm/s)                401.070
Energy Consumption (J/ml)        100
Estimated Power requirement (W)  31500
Reynolds Number                  4010.705
Pulse Generator Current          78.5

[0019] The actual sludge handling system and the associated instrumentation is shown in FIG. 4. A detailed list of specifications is provided in Table 2. Tank T1 holds up to 100 gallons of untreated feed material, delivered through valve V1 from the centrifuge 18. A mixer is provided for blending infeed material. A bottom drain allows disposal to sewer at the end of a test run. Valve V4 is provided for withdrawing a sample for analysis. Material leaves T1 through V2 and a strainer to a variable-speed progressing cavity pump, which can flow from 0.5 to 5.0 gallons per minute. The tank, pump mixer and associated valves are mounted to one 42-inch square skid for transport purposes. The feed leaving P1 passes through quick-connect fittings to a reinforced hose to the reactor.

[0020] The PEF-electroporation reactor subsystem includes a power supply, pulse generator and pairs of treatment chambers as described above with reference to FIG. 3. These would be mounted to a skid , along with associated valves V5, 6 and 7. Quick-connect fittings and hose convey the treated material to valves on the outlet tank skid. Valves V12 and 13 permit the treated material to be recycled back to T1. Valve V8 permits the treated material to enter tank T2, of 100-gallon capacity. As with T1, a mixer, a sample port and a bottom drain are provided. Tank T2, pump P2, mixer M2 and associated valves are mounted to another skid. Treated material leaving through V10 leads to transfer pump P2. Valve V18 is a globe style for adjusting the flow rate through V14 to tank T3. Valve V13 allows treated material from T2 to return to T1, assisted by P2, to increase treatment time.

[0021] The P2 pump is used to return the treated sludge to the biotreatment plant, aerobic tanks 10, when the PEF-electroporation system is used as a primary system, or optionally to filter press 16, if desired, when the PEF-electroporation system is used as a secondary treatment.

[0022] Safety logic has been incorporated as follows. Level control L1 will close V1 to prevent overfilling T1, with subsequent spillage. Level control L2 will shut down P1 and the power supply when the liquid level becomes too low. Level control L3 and T2 will shut down P1 and the power supply when tank T3 becomes full, to prevent spillage.

TABLE 2
Sludge Handling System Specifications
Description
Supplier                         Qty
Inlet Tank
T1 100-Gal carbon steel jacketed mixing tank 1
Buckeye Fab.                     1
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 90-Deg. elbow,
806-020 (bypass in)
Harrington Mixer,                1
C-Clamp mount direct drive, ¼ HP, 400-250-DD-ED
Harrington                       2
Union ball valve, 2-inch socket, 1001020
Harrington                       1
Strainer, 2-inch clear PVC, RVAT108
Harrington                       1
Replacement screen, PVC
Harrington                       1
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 pipe, 800-020, 20 feet length
Harrington                       2
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 90-Deg elbow, 806-020
Harrington                       2
Quick disconnect, Part F, 2-inch, polypro., FPP-020
Harrington                       2
Quick disconnect, Part C, 2-inch, polypro., CPP-020
Harrington                       100 ft
Hose, PVC standard duty, 2-inch, 110P-020
Harrington                       10/pack
Hose clamps, 3-inch, H-44SS
Harrington                       1
Bulkhead fitting, ½-inch PVC BF10050SXT
Harrington                       1
Ball valve, ½-inch socket, 107005
Harrington                       1
Elbow, 90-degree, ½-inch Sch 80 Pvc, 806-005
Harrington                       1
Level control, high to shut feed valve, LV751
Omega                            1
Level control, low to shut off pump P1 and
Powr supply, LV751
Omega                            1
Solid state relay for feed valve, SSR240AC10
Omega                            1
Solid state relay for pump and power supply,
SSR240AC25
Omega                            1
Feed Valve V1
Quick disconnect, Part F, 2-inch, polypro., FPP-020
Harrington                       1
Quick disconnect, Part C, 2-inch, polypro., CPP-020
Harrington                       1
Union ball valve, 2-inch, 1001020
Harrington                       1
Electric actuator, 2085020
Harrington                       1
Process Pump P1
Pump, 5.0 down to 0.5 GPM, 35 psi, Moyno
Buckeye Pump                     1
Direct Current control for pump, NEMA 4 enclosure
Buckeye Pump                     2
Hose nipples, polypro., 2-inch, HNPP-020
Harrington                       2
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 tee, 801-020
Harrington                       1
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 pipe, 800-020, 20 feet length
Harrington                       2
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 90-Deg elbow, 806-020
Harrington                       2
Reactor Connections
Quick disconnect, Part F, 2-inch, polypro., FPP-020
Harrington                       2
Quick disconnect, Part C, 2-inch, polypro., CPP-020
Harrington                       1
Union ball valve, 2-inch socket, 1001020
Harrington                       2
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 socket tee, 801-020
Harrington                       2
Reducing bushing, 2-inch by ½-inch thread, 838-247
Harrington                       2
½-inch by 1-1/2-inch long PVC Schedule 80 nipple,
882-015
Harrington                       2
Union ball valve, ½-inch threaded, 1001005
Harrington                       1
½-inch PVC Schedule 80 threaded tee, 805-005
Harrington                       2
Reducing bushing ½-inch to ¼-inch threaded, 839-072
Harrington                       1
Pressure gauge with guard, 0-60 psig, GGME060-PP
Harrington                       2
Tube adapter, ¼-inch MPT to ¼-inch tube, 4MSC4N-B
Parker
Outlet Tank
T2                               1
100-Gal jacketed carbon steel tank with legs,
2-in outlet
Buckeye Fab.                     1
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 90-Deg elbow, 806-020 (inlet)
Harrington
Union ball valve, 2-inch socket 1001020
Harrington                       3
Quick disconnect, Part F, 2-inch, polypro., FPP-020
Harrington                       3
Quick disconnect, Part C, 2-inch, polypro., CPP-020 3
Harrington                       4
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 90-Deg elbow, 806-020
Harrington                       2
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 socket tee, 801-020
Harrington                       3
2-inch PVC, Schedule 80 threaded tee, 805-020
Harrington                       2
2-inch by 6-inch PVC, Schedule 80 nipple
Harrington                       1
Mixer, C-Clamp mount direct drive, ¼ HP, 400-250-DD-ED
Harrington                       1
½-inch by 2-inch PVC, Schedule 80
Harrington                       1
Ball valve, ½ inch socket, 107005
Harrington                       1
Elbow 90-degree, ½-inch Sch 80 PVC, 806-005
Harrington                       1
Level control, low to shut off pump P1 and
Powr supply, LV751
Omega                            1
Solid state relay for pump and power supply,
SSR240AC25
Omega
Outlet Tank Pump
Pump, 5 GPM 20 feet of head, centrifugal
1 Buckeye Pump
Motor starter, NEMA 4 with thermal unit 1
C.E.D.
Hose nipples, polypro., 2-inch, HNPP-020 4
Harrington                       1
Glove valve, threaded, PVC, 2-inch, 1261020
Harrington
Product Pump P2
Pump, 5 GPM 20 feet of head, centrifugal 1
Buckeye Pump
Motor starter, NEMA 4 with thermal unit 1
C.E.D. Sealtite, ½-inch          lot
C.E.D. Wires, cords              lot
C.E.D.
Skids
42-inch square, metal, fork lift entry four sides
Instrumentation
Oscilloscope, storage, two inputs, 100 MHz, 1
printer interface
Tektronix                        1
Current sensor, 0.01 Volt/Ampere, 100 Amp. max.
Pearson Electr.                  1
Clamp-on flowmeter, 2 to 12-inch pipe,
4-20 ma output
Controlotron                     1
Voltage sensor, 60 Kilovolt, 1000 v/1V, Type PVM-1
North Star Resch                 1
Printer, Epsom jet Model 740, Part No. C257001
parallel port
ADS Systems                      1
Centronics-type paraller printer port cost,
Epsom F2E020-06
ADS Systems                      1 ea.
Type K thermocouple readout, Omega DP45KF + SB45
Omega                            2
Type K thermocouple, 304SS sheath, 1/8-in. dia.,
KQSS-18G-12
Omega                            1
Conductivity and pH meter, 0-200 μS, 0-14 pH,
P-19651-20
Cole-Parmer                      2
Conductivity and pH flow-through cell, P-19502-42
Cole-Parmer
Alternative clamp-on flow meter, Omron FD-303 + FD-5 sensor
for ¼-in. to ¾-in. pipe + FD-5000 sensor for ¾-in. to 12-
in. pipes.

[0023] While a specific embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that numerous changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method of dewatering paper-pulp sludge, municipal waste sludge, animal waste sludge containing intra-cellular water molecules contained in molecular cellular units of the waste sludge, or plant and animal waste sludge, comprising: (a) pumping the waste sludge into a dewatering apparatus; (b) destroying in the dewatering apparatus at least most of the individual cellular units of the waste sludge in order to release the intra-cellular water molecules contained therein; and said step (b) causing massive disruption of the cellular matter, allowing for the release of bound as well as intra-cellular liquids and intracellular dissolved/organic matter, which may be used as food for the bacteria of aeration tanks; (c) directing the released intracellular dissolved/organic matter to an aeration tank for supplying food to bacteria of said aeration tank.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said said step (b) comprises electroporating said sludge.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein said electroporation is performed with voltages between 15 KV. ad 100,00 KV.

4. A method of treating sludge, such as paper-pulp sludge, municipal sludge, plant and animal waste, in which the sludge is treated in an aeration tank for performing aerobic digestion, comprising: (a) treating the sludge to a dewatering process that releases intracellular dissolved/organic matter; (b) directing the sludge treated in said step (a) to an aeration tank for performing aerobic digestion thereon whereby the intracellular, dissolved organic matter is used as food for the bacteria of the aeration tanks, whereby the aerobic digestion process is accelerated thereby for the same amount of supplied oxygen.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said step (a) comprises electroporating the sludge.

6. The method according to claim 4, further comprising alternatively directing the sludge directly to a further dewatering process.

7. A method of treating sludge, such as paper-pulp sludge, municipal sludge, plant and animal waste, (a) treating the sludge to a dewatering process that releases intracellular, dissolved organic matter; (b) directing the sludge treated in said step (a) to one of: an aeration tank for performing aerobic digestion thereon, or to a different, dewatering process.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein said step (b) comprises alternatively directing the sludge to further dewatering process consisting of a filter press.

9. The method according to claim 7, wherein said (b) comprises directing the sludge to an aeration tank, where said intracellular, dissolved organic matter is used as food for the bacteria of the aeration tanks, whereby the aerobic digestion process is accelerated thereby for the same amount of supplied oxygen.