This invention relates generally to a method of trenching and, more particularly, a method of trenching below the water table in a porous formation.
The making of trenches is as old as civilization itself. Canals and aqueducts have been built to move water from one location to another. However, at the beginning of recorded time, such channels or aquaducts were built by hand. Later, domesticated animals were used in some of the digging or trenching.
As the industrial revolution progressed, machines were used to dig or excavate trenches. The machines varied in size from a hand held walk behind machines to large earth moving devices. When encountering rock, in addition to the machines, dynamite and other blasting devices were used to break up the rock. In approximately the 1970s, milling machines with cutting teeth having carbide hardened tips were used to mill away or cut the rock. By this century, the most common way of excavation or cutting new road beds through rocky portions of the earth's crust was the use of rock milling type machines.
Similar types of milling processes were used in the excavation or digging of trenches in rock formation, except the cutting teeth would be on trenching chains rotating around a boom that could be raised and lower. One of the largest manufacturers of trenching equipment is Astec Industries, Inc. which manufactures and sells a line of trenchers under that mark Trencor®. The Trencor® products range from walk behind trenchers, ride on trenchers, track mounted trenchers to road milling equipment.
Another large manufacturer of similar type of trenching equipment is sold under the mark Vermeer®. Again, the various types of trenching equipment sold under the Vermeer® brand range from walk behind trenchers, ride on trenchers, rock wheels, and track trenchers.
More and more trenches are now being excavated or dug in which to bury electrical cables, water pipes, sewer lines and the like. Many times the trenches being dug for public utilities are dug along existing streets or right of ways. If a trench is being dug along an existing street, it is very important there be a minimum amount of interruption with the normal traffic flow, plus a minimum clean up effort afterwards. In some areas, due to environmental constraints, the excavation or digging of the trench cannot interfere with natural habitat in the area. This means waste from the trenching may not wash off, or be disposed of, in the environmentally sensitive area.
A particularly unique environmentally sensitive area in which applicant has worked is the Florida Keys. Typically the surface of the earth is only a few feet above the water table. Because the rock in the Florida Keys is coral that has formed on the ocean floor, it is still porous. Therefore, when trenching below the water table in the porous rock, the material removed (sometimes called “spoil”) is very pliable like wet cement due to inflowing water. The wet spoil will spread over everything and is almost impossible to remove. However, in the same area when trenching above the water table, the spoil removed is relatively dry.
The problem with trenching below the water table in the Florida Keys is the wet spoil will inevitably get on everything, and despite the best efforts to clean up, some will remain. The part that remains will wash into the natural habitat surrounding the Florida Keys causing damage to the environment.
Areas other than the Florida Keys that have shallow water tables encounter the same problem of wet spoil when trenching below the water table. The wet spoil flows everywhere and is almost impossible to remove.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for trenching below the water table in the earth's surface.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide for trenching below the water table in the earth's surface, yet maintaining wet spoil in the trench.
It is still another object of the present invention to excavate or dig relatively dry spoil from the earth's surface down to the water table in a first pass and excavate or dig from the water table to the completed depth in a second pass, while maintaining the wet spoil inside the trench during the second pass.
It is yet another object of the present invention to prevent spoil removed from a trench from polluting the environment, especially in areas where trenching occurs below the water table.
In an environmentally sensitive area such as the Florida Keys, a first pass is made with a trencher having a boom with a digging chain thereon. During the first pass, the boom is lowered so that the digging chain excavates or digs the trench to an intermediate depth from the earth's surface to the water table. The relatively dry spoil removed during the first pass can be moved to one side of the intermediate depth trench.
Thereafter, a second pass occurs where the intermediate depth trench is excavated or dug from the water table to a full depth trench in a second pass. During the second pass, wet spoil is dug up, but drops back into the full depth trench and is retained therein. Also, during the second pass, the belts or conveyors are tuned OFF causing the wet spoil to drop back in to the full depth trench.
Because during the first pass, the relatively dry spoil was removed from the intermediate depth trench, during the second pass, even with the expansion of the wet spoil, the full depth trench can accommodate the wet spoil even with its expansion.
In digging the trench, a predetermined line is normally followed as to where the trench will go. The trencher, which is normally a track mounted trencher, follows the predetermined line with the boom and digging chain excavating or digging along the predetermined line in a first direction to excavate from the surface to the water table. However, during the second pass, it can be by either of the following two methods.
In the first method, a second digging machine moves in the same direction with the digging chain reversed and the belts or conveyors turned OFF so that the wet spoil removed when digging from the water table to the full depth will fall back into the full depth trench. The full depth trench has enough space to accommodate the wet spoil even with expansion.
The second method is for the first digging machine after making the first pass along the predetermined line to dig from the earth's surface to the water table, simply operates in reverse, but with the belt and/or conveyors turned OFF and raised, plus the boom lowered, to dig from the water table to the full depth trench. The wet spoil drops back into the full depth trench. Again, the full depth trench can accommodate the wet spoil plus the expansion. The only problem is that in this second method, the digging is on the end of the boom which causes more vibrations back in the trencher than would be caused using the first method.
Also, during the second pass of either method, the speed of the trencher and the digging chain should be slowed down during the second pass (1) to prevent spillage of the wet spoil outside of the completed trench and (2) to provide the best trenching performance.
A third method may be used wherein the first digging machine makes a first pass along the predetermined line, but has the digging chain rotating in a counter clockwise direction so that the upwardly rotating side of digging chain digs on the downward rotation. Some of the loosened spoil will travel up the digging chain onto the belt and be removed to the side of the trench being dug. During the first pass the trench is dug from the surface to the water table.
Thereafter, the same digging machine makes a second pass in the same direction, but (1) with the boom lowered so that the trench is dug from the water table to the full depth and (2) the belt is turned OFF. By turning the belt OFF, the wet spoil will accumulate, ride up the digging chain, but will fall back into the trench. Due to a removal of a portion of the dry spoil when digging from the surface to the water table, the trench now has enough space to accommodate the wet spoil and have room for expansion.
When trenching in an area of South Florida or the Florida Keys, the surface 10 may be only a few feet above the water table 12 as shown in
In the present invention as shown in
Forward movement of the first trencher 14 is controlled by tracks 34 on either side thereof. The tracks 34 have the proper amount of rotation to maintain the cutting teeth 18 in excavating contact with the earth's crust 20 and to maintain close to optimum cutting conditions for digging the intermediate trench 22. A better view of the cutting chain 28 with the cutting teeth 18 thereon is shown in
If the trenching as shown in
After the first pass by the first trencher 14, a second trencher 36 makes a pass along the same predetermined line so that the intermediate trench 22 is dug in to increase the depth from approximately the water table 12 to the completed depth 38 to form a full depth trench 40. However, in making the second pass and digging from the water table 12 to the completed depth 38, wet spoil 42 is created. While the amount of water content and consistency of the wet spoil 42 varies depending upon a number of factors, it is normally very pliable and flowable. The wet spoil 42 is similar in texture to wet concrete with gravel therein.
In making the second pass with the second trencher 36, the digging chain 44 is reversed so that the cutting teeth cut on the way down because the direction of rotation of the digging chain 44 for second trencher 36 is the opposite of the direction of rotation of the digging chain 28 of first trencher 14, both directions being shown with the direction of the arrows. Also, the belt 48 is turned OFF and raised. The wet spoil 42 will tend to be carried upward on the boom 50 where the digging chain 44 is moving upward as is shown in
Tracks 52 will control the forward motion of the second trencher 36. It has been found the operation of the second trencher 36 and the rotational speed of the digging chain 44 may have to be adjusted downward to prevent wet spoil 42 from spilling outside of the full depth trench 40. Also, by slowing the speed of the digging chain 40 and forward motion of second trencher 36, the cutting teeth 46 will cut larger size chunks for including in the wet spoil 42. Both the rotational speed of the tracks 52 and the rotational speed of the digging chain 44 control the spillage of wet spoil 42 from the full depth trench 40, plus the size of the rock in the wet spoil 42.
Referring now to
After completing the first pass as shown in
One of the problems with the second pass as shown in
If the methods as shown either in
Months later when the decision is made to lay, for example, a sewer line in the full depth trench 40, a backhoe 64 may be used to excavate the relatively dry spoil 26 and the wet spoil 42 from the full depth trench 40 (see
By use of the methods just described, a trench can be dug or excavated below the water table in an environmentally sensitive area such as the Florida Keys. The relatively dry spoil 26 can be easily controlled and scooped up. However, wet spoil 42 flows everywhere and is almost impossible to remove under normal trenching conditions. By use of the current method, the wet spoil 42 is retained inside of the trench until it is excavated with a backhole 64 and carried away. This prevents the spoil from contaminating the environment therearound, especially in environmentally sensitive areas like the Florida Keys.
A third method of digging or excavation of a trench in an environmentally sensitive area is illustrated in
The same trencher 14 can be used for a second pass as illustrated in
The rotational speed of the tracks 34 and digging chain 28 may have to be adjusted in
After digging of the full depth trench 40 as explained in conjunction with
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1698529 | Bennett | Jan 1929 | A |
3998065 | Darnell | Dec 1976 | A |
4542940 | Marten | Sep 1985 | A |
4662684 | Marten | May 1987 | A |
4714379 | Gilchrist, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4741646 | Hatch | May 1988 | A |
4871281 | Justice | Oct 1989 | A |
5242246 | Manchak et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5611643 | Tallard | Mar 1997 | A |
5685668 | Justice | Nov 1997 | A |
5830752 | Bruso | Nov 1998 | A |
6058631 | Crawford | May 2000 | A |
7010873 | Kinoshita et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7037040 | Phillips et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7632039 | Patterson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20080127529 | Stanek et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100050482 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |