Method of using hydrophilized bactericidal polymers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11459415
  • Patent Number
    11,459,415
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 8, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 4, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A bactericidal polymeric composition includes a hydrophilic first comonomer copolymerized to a second comonomer to produce a polymeric composition that is more hydrophilic or more bactericidal in an aqueous solution than either of the comonomers alone. Methods for identifying bactericidal polymers, methods for rendering materials bactericidal, and methods for using bactericidal compositions to kill or reduce bacterial growth are also described. Applications for the inventive compositions include their use in catheters, stents, medical devices, contact lenses; root canal fillers; and/or wound dressings.
Description
BACKGROUND

There is an ever-growing demand for materials suitable for killing harmful microorganisms. Such materials could be used to coat surfaces of common objects touched by people to render them antiseptic so as to prevent transmission of bacterial infections or to facilitate the killing of microorganisms in solution.


Various polycations are known to have bactericidal properties. However, their bactericidal properties can be strongly influenced by whether the polycation or a composition containing the polycation is soluble. In some instances, the bactericidal property is most apparent in an insoluble form, which is not particularly amenable to killing microorganisms. In other instances, the bactericidal activity is lost when the polycation is cross-linked or otherwise rendered insoluble. Application of bactericidal polymers may also be limited by their use in brushes, their insolubility in solution, or by their unfavorable biocompatibility characteristics. Accordingly, there is a need for bactericidal formulations possessing having improved bactericidal, hydrophilicity/wettability and biocompatibility characteristics suitable for rendering materials or areas bactericidal and for killing airborne and/or waterborne microorganisms.


BRIEF SUMMARY

The present invention is directed to polymeric compositions providing improved bactericidal, hydrophilicity/wettability, and biocompatibility characteristics. In particular, the present invention provides a bactericidal composition, including a hydrophilic first comonomer polymerized to a second comonomer to form a polymeric composition, where the polymeric composition is more soluble and/or more bactericidal in an aqueous solution than either of the first comonomer or the second comonomer alone.


In a particular example, the present invention provides a quaternized bactericidal composition, in which poly(4-vinylpyridine) (PVP) is copolymerized with hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) or poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate (PEGMA).


In another example, the present invention provides a method for rendering a material or area bactericidal in which a bactericidal composition of the present invention is applied to a medium or device in an amount suitable for killing or significantly reducing the number of bacteria in or on the treated medium or device compared to an untreated medium or device.


In another example, the present invention provides a method for killing or significantly reducing the number of bacteria on a material or area treated with a bactericidal composition of the present invention.


In a further example, the present invention provides a method for identifying a polymer having suitable bactericidal activity in which a hydrophilic first comonomer is polymerized to a second comonomer to form a bactericidal polymeric composition, where the polymeric composition is determined to have suitable bactericidal activity if the polymeric composition has a higher bactericidal activity in an aqueous solution than either of the hydrophilic first comonomer or second comonomer alone (or treated similarly as the polymeric composition).


Applications for the inventive compositions include their use in catheters, needles, sutures, stents and other implantable medical devices, contact lenses, root canal fillers, wound dressings, burn dressings, tissue culture plates, and the like.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic showing (A) the radical polymerization of P(VP-co-HEMA) and (B) quaternization of P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB.



FIG. 2 is graph of bactericidal results for surface testing of P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB.



FIG. 3 is a graph of advancing and receding contact angles for P(VP-co-HEMA).



FIG. 4 is a graph of bactericidal results for testing of P(VP-co-PEGMA1100).



FIG. 5 is a bar chart plotting the fraction of dead epithelial cells as a function of added bactericidal polymer or polymer control.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In order to provide a clearer and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, the following definitions are provided. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of skill in the art to which this invention belongs.


The term “monomer” refers to a relatively simple compound, usually containing carbon and of low molecular weight, which can react to form a polymer by combining with itself or with other monomers.


The terms “polymer” and “polymeric composition” are used interchangeably to denote a product of a polymerization reaction, and are inclusive of homopolymers, copolymers, terpolymers, etc.


The terms “polymerization” and “polymerization reaction” are inclusive of homopolymerizations, copolymerizations, terpolymerizations, and the like, and include all types of copolymerizations such as random, graft, block, and the like. In general, the polymers in the bactericidal composition on may be prepared in accordance with any suitable polymerization process, including slurry polymerization, solution polymerization, emulsion polymerization, gas phase polymerization, and high pressure polymerization and the like.


The term “comonomer” refers to a monomer, copolymer, or polymer which can copolymerize with itself or with at least one different monomer, copolymer, or polymer in a copolymerization reaction, the result of which can be a polymer, copolymer or polymeric composition.


The term “copolymer” refers to a polymer which can copolymerize with itself or with at least one different comonomer, polymer, or copolymer in a polymerization reaction or it can refer to a product resulting from a polymerization reaction of two comonomers. The copolymer may be identified or named in terms of the monomer(s) from which the copolymer is produced.


The terms “corresponding comonomer,” “corresponding copolymer,” and “corresponding polymer” are used to relate comonomers, copolymers, or polymers, respectively, sharing a common set of monomeric units between e.g. distinct polymeric compositions. The common comonomers, copolymers, or polymer need not be identical in terms of the molecular weight(s) or molar ratio(s) of commonly shared monomeric units.


The phrase “corresponding molecular weight” is used to relate molecular weight(s) of corresponding comonomers, copolymers, or polymers, respectively, in distinct polymeric compositions in which the common comonomers, copolymers, or polymers differ from one another by molecular weight(s) or commonly shared monomeric units within the corresponding comonomer, copolymer or polymer.


The phrase “corresponding molar ratio” is used to relate molar ratio(s) of corresponding comonomers, copolymers, or polymers, respectively, in distinct polymeric compositions in which the common comonomers, copolymers, or polymers differ from one another by molar ratio(s) or commonly shared monomeric units within the corresponding comonomer, copolymer or polymer.


The term “bactericidal” is used to interchangeably denote any one of the following: (i) a comonomer, polymer, copolymer, polymeric composition suitably formulated to kill, reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of one or more bacteria; (ii) a material, substance, medium, device, or area treated with a bactericidal comonomer, polymer, copolymer, polymeric composition so as to kill, reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of one or more bacteria.


The term “aqueous solution” refers to a solution in which water is the solvent.


The term “medium” refers to a treatable material, treatable substance, treatable device, or treatable area in which “treatable” refers to a capacity to be rendered bactericidal by a bactericidal comonomer, polymer, or copolymer. A treatable medium may have a defined physical form, but may include liquid (e.g., water, aqueous solution) or gaseous materials (e.g., air) also.


The phrases “significantly reducing the growth of bacteria” and “significantly reducing bacterial growth” are used interchangeably to denote one or more of the following conditions, including (i) a condition in which the metabolic activity of at least 50% of the microorganisms of a particular type exposed to a treated medium is terminated or reduced compared to bacteria of that particular type exposed to an untreated medium over a fixed period of time; (ii) a condition where there is 50% or less of one or more bacterial types present in and/or on a treated medium compared to the number of bacteria exposed to an untreated medium; and/or (iii) a condition resulting when one or more types of bacteria adhere 50% less to a treated medium compared to an untreated medium. The degree of bacterial growth reduction with respective to conditions (i)-(iii) may range from 50% to greater 99.9%.


The phrase “significantly bactericidal” denotes a comonomer, polymer, copolymer, composition, polymeric composition, material, substance or treated area in which the bactericidal comonomer, polymer, copolymer, composition, polymeric composition, material, substance or treated area is suitably formulated to significantly reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of bacteria by at least 50%.


The term “biocompatible” refers to a material that is substantially non-toxic in the in vivo environment of its intended use, and that is not substantially rejected by the patient's physiological system (i.e., is non-antigenic). This can be gauged by the ability of a material to pass the biocompatibility tests set forth in International Standards Organization (ISO) Standard No. 10993 and/or the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) 23 and/or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blue book memorandum No. G95-1, entitled “Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing.” Typically, these tests measure a material's toxicity, infectivity, pyrogenicity, irritation potential, reactivity, hemolytic activity, carcinogenicity and/or immunogenicity. A biocompatible structure or material, when introduced into a majority of patients, will not cause a significantly adverse, long-lived or escalating biological reaction or response, and is distinguished from a mild, transient inflammation which typically accompanies surgery or implantation of foreign objects into a living organism.


A bactericidal polymeric composition of the present invention includes a hydrophilic first comonomer polymerized to a second comonomer, where the polymeric composition is more soluble and/or more bactericidal in an aqueous solution than either of the first comonomer or the second comonomer alone. The polymeric composition of the present invention was found to have unexpected hydophilizing and/or wettabiliy properties providing enhanced bactericidal activity compared to either comonomer alone.


The second comonomer may be inherently bactericidal or it may be rendered bactericidal after a subsequent step (e.g., polymerization) and/or chemical modification (e.g., quaternization) of alkyl groups. Where the polymeric composition is further modified by chemical modification, such as quaternization, preferably, the polymeric composition is more hydrophilic and/or bactericidal than a similarly modified (by e.g., quaternization) second comonomer alone.


Bactericidal comonomers or those capable of being rendered bactericidal are copolymerized to a hydrophilizing comonomer. Exemplary second comonomers for polymerization to a hydrophilizing comonomer may include a variety of vinyl monomers capable of free radical polymerization and/or quaternization. Accordingly, these comonomers may include, but are not limited to, vinyl amines, such as N,N-dimethylvinylamine; allyl amines; vinyl esters, such as vinyl acetate; alkyl acrylates; and vinyl chloride. In a preferred embodiment, a pyridinium-type comonomer, such as vinyl pyridine or 4-vinylpyridine, is quaternized after polymerization to a hydrophilizing comonomer.


The second comonomer composition may include or be chemically linked to a suitable bactericidal moiety, including, but not limited to polycationic species, polycationic derivatives or combinations therefrom. Polycationic species may contain two or more quaternary ammonium groups with a molecular weight ranging from several hundred Daltons to a few hundred thousand Daltons. The quaternary ammonium groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyionenes, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), dimethylamine-epichlorohydrin copolymers and imidazole-epichlorohydrin copolymers. Suitable bactericidal comonomers for use in the present invention may include the quaternary ammonium group-containing polymers disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,482,680, which are incorporated by reference herein.


Polycationic species may contain two or more amine groups. The amine groups can be primary, secondary, tertiary, or mixtures thereof. The amine groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyethyleneimines, polypropyleneimines, polyvinylamines, polyallylamines, polydiallylamines, polyamidoamines, polyaminoalkylmethacrylates, polylysines, and mixtures thereof.


The polycationic species may also be a modified polyamine with at least one amine group substituted with at least one other functional group. Examples include ethoxylated and alkoxylated polyamines and alkylated polyamines. Other suitable bactericidal comonomers or those that may be rendered bactericidal may be identified and/or used in accordance with the applications and objectives set forth in the specification and claims.


Quaternization may be carried out using alkylating agents, including but not limited to alkyl halides (such as hexyl bromide), alkyl sulfonates, alkyl mesylates, alkyl tosylates, or other alkylating agents possessing a suitable leaving group. Quaternization reduces self-polymerization of the bactericidal comonomer upon polymerization with the hydrophilizing comonomer. Quaternization may confer increased bactericidal activity and is typically carried out after polymerization, since quaternized polymers are unpolymerizable.


Quaternized alkyl groups and/or other cationic chains may be attracted to and/or promote interaction and penetration negatively charged bacterial cell walls on account of their lipophilic nature. Alkyl chain lengths of quaternizing agents and overall hydrophilic/lipophilic balance may affect bactericidal activity of the polymeric compositions of the present invention. Accordingly, these variables may be modified to optimize or improve bactericidal activity of the polymeric compositions.


Hydrophilizing comonomers of the present invention confer increased wettability or hydrophilicity to one or more surfaces of the polymeric composition in aqueous solutions, including water. Preferably, the polymeric composition is more wettable than a bactericidal comonomer or a comonomer rendered bactericidal by quaternization, such as poly(4-vinylpyridine). Suitable hydrophilizing monomers or copolymers, may include, but are not limited to, ethylene glycol (ethylene oxide); polyethylene glycol derivatives, including poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), poly(ethyleneglycol) acrylate, and vinyl polyethylene glycol; vinyl acetate; poly(vinyl alcohol); vinyl pyrrolidone and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone); vinyl pyrrolidinone and poly(vinyl pyrrolininone); vinyl oxazoline and poly(vinyl oxazoline); vinyl formamide and poly(vinyl formamide); hydroxyalkyl acrylates and hydroxyalkyl methacrylates, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and hydroxyethyl acrylate; methacrylamide; acrylamide and methacrylamide based monomers, such as acrylamide, N,N-dimethyl acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and hydroxymethyl acrylamide; monomers containing one or more of the following functional groups: hydroxy, amino, ammonium, ether, carboxylate, amide, and sulfonamide groups; and combinations or copolymers thereof. polyvinyloxazolines


Hydrophilic polymeric compositions and methods for hydrophilizing polymeric materials, including the use of high energy treatments, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 20050008839, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety, also may be used.


Preferably, the hydrophilizing comonomer is biocompatible. Standard assays may be utilized to evaluate biocompatibility, including but not limited to viability/cytotoxicity mammalian cell assays and the like. Representative hydrophilizing comonomers or copolymers include hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate (PEGMA).


HEMA is widely used in biomedical applications and devices, most prominently soft contact lenses. HEMA, with 37.8% water per weight, is typical of hydrogels. Preferably, the molar ratio of HEMA comonomer in the polymeric composition is equal to or greater than about 90 to 1.


PEGMA is a biocompatible polymer which possesses several important properties, such as good solubility in both organic and aqueous media, low toxicity, immunogenicity and nonbiodegradability.


Preferably, the molar molecular weight of PEGMA comonomer in the bactericidal composition is equal to or greater than 300, more preferably between about 300 and about 2000, including but not limited to 1100. Preferably, the molar ratio of PEGMA comonomer in the polymeric composition is equal to or less than about 10 to 1; equal to or less than about 25 to 1; equal to or greater than about 75 to 1; equal to or greater than about 95 to 1; equal to or greater than about 99 to 1.


Hydrophilicity or wettability can be evaluated by any suitable methodology known in the art, including contact angle testing and tensionometry testing. Contact angle testing of polymeric compositions may be carried out by dip coating microscope slides in solutions with copolymer dissolved in chloroform and methanol and obtaining contact angle measurements using e.g., a Ramé-Hart Advanced Goniometer. Contact angles may be characterized as advancing or receding, the difference being whether or not the angle is taken when moving onto a dry surface or moving off a wet surface. Advancing angles may be used for surface energy determinations, receding angles for characterizing other surface characteristics.


Polymeric bactericidal compositions may be rendered hydrophilic by engineering them to have advancing contact angles with water of less than or equal to about 90 degrees, preferably less than or equal to about 45 degrees, more preferably less than or equal to about 30 degrees, less than or equal to 15 degrees after 30 seconds of spreading.


The disclosed bactericidal compositions are suitably formulated to significantly reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of bacteria. A bactericidal composition may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial growth from a treated medium by a factor of at least 50%. Further, a bactericidal composition may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial growth from a treated medium by at least 60%, by at least 70%, by at least 80%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 99%, or by at least 99.9%.


The bactericidal composition may be applied as a coating to at least one portion or surface of a medium or medical device, including but not limited to catheters, needles, stents, and other implantable medical devices. Various methods may be used to apply the comonomers or bactericidal polymers as a coating to the surface of the medical device. Suitable methods for applying coatings may include, but are not limited to the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,509,899 and 6,221,425, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.


Comonomers may be applied to a surface and subsequently polymerized. Alternatively, the bactericidal polymer composition may be applied directly to the surface of the medical device. In particular, one or more comonomers or bactericidal polymers may be combined with water and sprayed onto the medical device. Alternatively, the medical device may be dipped into a solution containing the bactericidal polymer. The comonomer or bactericidal polymer may be present in the solution in an amount from about 50% to about 98% by weight, particularly from about 70% to about 90% by weight, and applied to the surface of the medical device.


The viscosity of the monomeric or polymeric solution can be adjusted depending upon the particular application and circumstances. In general, when dipping the medical device into the solution, higher viscosities will cause more of the bactericidal polymer to remain on the surface of the device. Thus, if thicker coatings are desired, the viscosity can be increased. The viscosity of the solution can be increased by minimizing the amount of water in the solution. Additionally, thickeners, such as a polyacrylamide, can be added to the solution. The viscosity of the solution may also be increased by partially polymerizing the monomer.


In another example, the present invention provides methods for rendering a material or area bactericidal. In a further example, the present invention provides a method for killing or significantly reducing the number of bacteria on a material or area treated with a bactericidal composition of the present invention.


Accordingly, in one example, a bactericidal composition of the present invention is applied to a medium or medical device in an amount sufficient to kill or significantly reducing the number of bacteria in or on the treated medium compared to an untreated medium. In a further example, a bactericidal composition according to the present invention is applied to a medium or medical device in an amount sufficient to kill at least one bacterium or significantly reduce bacterial growth compared to an untreated medium.


The bacteria may be Gram-positive or Gram-negative. The bactericidal composition may be included in or coated onto a catheter, stent, implantable medical device, contact lens, root canal filler, or wound dressing. The treated medium may include natural or synthetic materials, implantable devices, or bodily surfaces. The treated medium may be contact with an aqueous environment, such as water or the inside of a patient or other vertebrate organism. Alternatively, the treated medium may be contact with air or air and/or air borne bacteria in an external environment or an enclosed bodily organ, such as lung.


Biocompatibility may be evaluated by any suitable methodology known in the art, including biocompatibility tests set forth in International Standards Organization (ISO) Standard No. 10993 and/or the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) 23 and/or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blue book memorandum No. G95-1, entitled “Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing.” In addition, any of the viability/cytotoxicity assays known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be used to evaluate lack of toxicity for normal human cells.


In a further example, the present invention provides a method for identifying a polymer having suitable bactericidal activity. In this method, a hydrophilizing first comonomer may be polymerized to a second comonomer and a bactericidal polymeric composition is formed. The bactericidal polymeric composition may be applied to a medium to form a first treated medium and the medium may be separately treated with the second comonomer used in the first treated medium. The first treated medium and the second treated medium may be separately contacted with a plurality of bacteria. Whether the first treated medium is more bactericidal than the second treated medium may be determined.


In a further example, a first polymeric composition and a second polymeric composition differing by molecular weight with regard to one or more corresponding comonomers may be separately applied to a medium and tested to identify a polymeric composition having improved bactericidal activity.


Alternatively, a first polymeric composition and a second polymeric composition differing by molar ratio of their corresponding comonomers may be varied and may be separately applied to a medium and tested to identify a polymeric composition having improved bactericidal activity.


In the above disclosed methods, a given polymeric composition may be rendered bactericidal by quaternization after polymerizing the hydrophilizing first comonomer to the second comonomer. Accordingly, the quaternized polymeric composition would be deemed suitable for use in a bactericidal composition if a medium containing or treated with the quaternized polymeric composition is more hydrophilic and/or bactericidal than the same medium containing or treated with the quaternized second comonomer alone.


Bactericidal activity may be evaluated using any suitable testing methodology used in the art, including, but not limited to, luminescence, optical density, or microscopic evaluation of bacterial growth or viability of coated and/or stained microscopic slides, plates or cultures.


The following examples illustrate features in accordance with the present invention, and are provided solely by way of illustration. They are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims or their equivalents.


EXAMPLES

1. Radical Polymerization and Quaternization. Copolymers possessing suitable bactericidal properties and a suitable hydrophilicity/biocompatibility profile were obtained using a quaternized polymeric composition synthesized from 4-vinylpyridine and a biocompatible, hydrophilic comonomer, such as hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) or poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate.


Copolymers were synthesized by radical copolymerization with AIBN as initiator. The reactants were stirred at 70° C. for 48 hours under flowing N2 to prevent oxidation. As the monomer contents were varied, the AIBN proportion was held constant to a mass ratio VP+PEGMA:AIBN equal to 22:1. To investigate the effects of hydrophilization, seven different compositions of VP with PEGMA300, PEGMA1100 and HEMA were synthesized, containing a molar percentage of VP of 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 95 and 99.


Copolymers were quaternized with a 3-fold excess of hexyl bromide (HB) in a mixture of chloroform and methanol by reflux for 48 hr. They were precipitated in hexane, recovered and dried under vacuum. A schematic of the radical polymerization and quaternization process can be seen in FIG. 1.


Synthesis of P(VP-co-HEMA), P(VP-co-PEGMA300) and P(VP-co-PEGMA1100) was followed with FTIR and NMR. Spectroscopy showed that the synthesis was successful and that the quaternization went to near completion and that the resultant products were relatively pure after work-up.


VP, HEMA and PEGMA were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Co. (Milwaukee, USA). To avoid polymerization through heat or light, these monomers were inhibited with hydroquinone (HQ), 4-Methoxyphenol (MEHQ), and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) respectively. The HQ and MEHQ inhibitors were removed by means of trap to trap while BHT was purified from PEGMA by column chromatography on silica gel (70-270 mesh) stationary phase.


2. Contact Angle and Bactericidal Testing. To evaluate wettability or hydrophilicity, contact angle tests were conducted by dip coating microscope slides in solutions with copolymer dissolved in chloroform and methanol. Contact angle measurements were obtained on a Ramé-Hart Advanced Goniometer.


Bactericidal tests were performed with a small quantity of the bacteria Escherichia coli O157:H7 in which the lux gene was added for luminescence, which provides a measure of metabolic growth or activity. A sample was taken from a culture and placed in contact with the coated slides, by means of a pipette. The intensity of the bioluminescence was recorded as a function of time for two hours with a photomultiplier tube. Reduced bioluminescence correlates with enhanced bactericidal activity.


3. Bactericidal activity of P(VP-co-HEMA). The results of the bactericidal tests on quaternized copolymers of VP and HEMA are shown in FIG. 2. An initial increase of intensity is observed in the control, due to the fast growth of the bacteria, called blooming. After approximately 19 minutes, the intensity starts decreasing as the bacteria start to die. PVP-HB, known to kill bacteria, prevents blooming, as reflected by the fact that the intensity never increases by more than 1 percent. The intensity starts decreasing after only 7 minutes. Since this is much earlier than the control, the death of the bacteria can be attributed to the properties of the polymer. An uninterrupted blooming is observed for a slide coated with PHEMA, and the number of bacteria has quadrupled after two hours, following a lag-log behavior. This indicates that PHEMA by itself is not bactericidal.


P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 95/5 and P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 90/10 exhibited enhanced bactericidal activity compared to PVP-HB alone. The luminescence recorded for P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 99/1, is similar to, but slightly less than that observed for PVP-HB alone. Accordingly, this copolymer, having one molar percent HEMA, displays properties similar to PVP-HB alone. However, a slide coated with P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 99/1 kills bacteria faster than one coated with PVP-HB.


The wettability of dry, vitreous HEMA-based materials was studied by contact angle measurements. The results for both advancing and receding angles are given in FIG. 3. Contact angle measurements showed an increase in hydrophilicity provoked by the copolymerization. The surface energy was found to be minimal for P(VP-co-HEMA) at 90/10 and slightly higher for P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 99/1. This corresponds to the bactericidal behavior of the polymers and suggests that the wettability plays a significant role in the polymer's effectiveness. Being a hydrogel monomer, HEMA hydrophilizes the copolymer.


Although not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that coupling hydrophilization to bactericidal activity in the polymer facilitates enhances bacterial killing, in part because of the water-loving nature of bacteria: a hydrophilic growth medium is better able to support uptake and killing by a hydrophilized bactericidal polymer compared to an unhydrophilized bactericidal polymer. Moreover, it is believed that the bactericidal polymers are electrostatically attracted to the bacterial cell wall whereby lipophilic side chains insert into the bacterial cell membrane, disrupting it so that holes form therein.


In P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 90/10, the wettability effect is particularly evident. This polymer exhibits a more optimal bactericidal activity, reflected in the fact that all bacteria were killed in 30 minutes. This further illustrates that that a slide coated with P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 90/10 copolymer is significantly more bactericidal than pure PVP-HB.


4. Bactericidal activity of P(VP-co-PEGMA). The bacterial growth behavior for copolymers with PEGMA1100 can be seen in FIG. 4. Comonomer ratios of 90/10, 25/75, and 10/90 exhibited enhanced bactericidal activity compared to PVP-HB alone. Extremely high bactericidal activity was seen with ratios of 99/1, presumably due to the large fraction of VP and improved wettability from PEGMA1100. Copolymers with ratios ranging from 95/5 to 50/50 displayed bacterial results similar to PVP-HB.


P(VP-co-PEGMA1100)-HB 25/75 and 10/90 displayed a surprisingly high antibacterial activity. Although counterintuitive, this fact can have several explanations. The molecular weight of P(VP-co-PEGMA1100)-HB 10/90 is much higher than other copolymer formulations of this system. This could increase bactericidal activity, because the copolymer possesses more alkyl tails to traverse the bacterial membranes. The enhanced water wettability of the polymer may enable the polymer to better dissolve in and/or surround the bacteria in an aqueous medium, so as to facilitate more efficient bacterial killing.


PPEGMA300 (graph not shown) alone does not kill bacteria and actually improves growth due to its biocompatibility and hydrophilicity. The improved biocompatibility and hydrophilicity is carried over into the P(VP-co-PEGMA300) copolymers with ratios from 0/100 to 50/50 thereby improving bacterial growth. However, for ratios greater 50/50, bactericidal activity was observed. The optimum balance between spreading and VP content was found to be 75/25, in which half the bacteria were killed in the first 15 minutes. Overall, the bactericidal behavior of the PEGMA300 based polymers were reduced compared to PEGMA1100 based polymers.


PEGMA1100 has a significantly larger PEG size than PEGMA300. A smaller fraction of PEGMA1100 is thus necessary to hydrophilize P(VP-co-PEGMA1100). However, even for some similarly hydrophilized polymers, the PEGMA1100 materials exhibit superior bactericidal activity, possibly due to the enhanced protein resistance imparted by longer PEG chains in the polymers.


The enhanced bactericidal activity exhibited by the HEMA and PEGMA copolymers appears to result from enhanced wettability in aqueous solutions, allowing the polymer to better surround and/or gain access to the bacteria, so as to enhance bacterial killing.


5. Cytotoxity of P(VP-co-PEGMA). A viability/cytotoxicity assay may be used to evaluate biocompatibility of the bactericidal polymers for mammalian cells. In particular, FIG. 5 shows that an exemplary bactericidal PEGMA1100 copolymer is non-toxic to mammalian cells. Corneal epithelial cells were seeded onto polystyrene culture plates in phosphobuffered saline solution (PBS; pH 7.2) at a density of 3,500 cells/cm2 for 24 hrs at 37° C. The cells were co-incubated for 4 hrs. with quaternized P(VP-co-PEGMA1100) copolymer or PPEGMA control polymer in PBS at a concentration of 2.5 mg/ml, along with a PBS negative control media.


Live cells were distinguished from dead cells using a fluorescence-based LIVE/DEAD viability/cytotoxicity assay system (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Detection Technologies). The assay system includes two probes, calcein AM, a fluorogenic esterase substrate producing a green fluorescent product in live cells having intracellular esterase activity, and ethidium homodimer-1, a high-affinity, red fluorescent dye only able to pass through and stain the compromised membranes of dead cells. FIG. 5 plots the fraction of dead epithelial cells as a function of added bactericidal polymer or polymer control. As shown in FIG. 5, treatment of epithelial cells with the bactericidal P(VP-co-PEGMA) polymer did not exhibit a statistically significant level of epithelial cell killing over that of the PEGMA polymer or PBS negative controls.


It is to be understood that the above-described polymers and methods for their use are merely representative embodiments illustrating the principles of this invention and that other variations in the polymers or methods, may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. The foregoing detailed description and accompanying drawings have been provided solely by way of explanation and illustration, and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims. Many variations in the presently preferred embodiments illustrated herein will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, and remain within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method of reducing a number of bacteria comprising a. contacting the bacteria and a bactericidal copolymer, andb. reducing growth of the bacteria with the bactericidal copolymer,c. wherein the bactericidal copolymer is a copolymer comprising i. a 4-vinyl pyridine, wherein the 4 vinyl pyridine is quaternized with an alkyl group; andii. a hydrophilic comonomer comprising a PEG ester having an acrylate or a methacrylate group.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrophilic comonomer has the methacrylate group.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the hydrophilic comonomer has a molar molecular weight of at least about 300.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the hydrophilic comonomer has a molar molecular weight of less than about 2000.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the hydrophilic comonomer has a molar molecular weight of about 1100.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the bactericidal copolymer contains less than or equal to about 10 mole percent of the hydrophilic comonomer.
  • 7. The method of claim 2, wherein the bactericidal copolymer contains less than or equal to about 95 mole percent of said 4-vinyl pyridine.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the bactericidal copolymer contains less than or equal to about 75 mole percent of said 4-vinyl pyridine.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the bactericidal copolymer contains less than or equal to about 50 mole percent of said 4-vinyl pyridine.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the bactericidal copolymer contains less than or equal to about 25 mole percent of said 4-vinyl pyridine.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein said alkyl group is hexyl.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said alkyl group is hexyl.
  • 13. The method of claim 3, wherein the bactericidal copolymer consists essentially of said 4-vinyl pyridine quaternized with the alkyl group and the hydrophilic comonomer.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/163,285 filed May 24, 2016, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 14/837,900 filed Aug. 27, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/509,915 filed Aug. 24, 2006, and this application also claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/711,234, filed Aug. 24, 2005, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as if put forth in full below.

US Referenced Citations (329)
Number Name Date Kind
2717887 Saner Sep 1955 A
2882157 Thompson et al. Apr 1959 A
2972535 Laakso et al. Feb 1961 A
3140227 Roth et al. Jul 1964 A
3227672 Fertig et al. Jan 1966 A
3262807 Sterman et al. Jul 1966 A
3296167 Turner et al. Jan 1967 A
3296196 Lamoreaux Jan 1967 A
3328328 Scanley Jun 1967 A
3450794 Ebneth et al. Jun 1969 A
3592805 Szabo et al. Jul 1971 A
3597313 Coscia et al. Aug 1971 A
3619200 Ferguson et al. Nov 1971 A
3753716 Ishihara et al. Aug 1973 A
3871376 Kozak Mar 1975 A
3872128 Byck Mar 1975 A
3898188 Rembaum et al. Aug 1975 A
3929741 Laskey Dec 1975 A
3975350 Hudgin et al. Aug 1976 A
4011178 Muse Mar 1977 A
4017440 Killam Apr 1977 A
4026941 Login et al. May 1977 A
4029694 Weipert et al. Jun 1977 A
4069365 Rembaum Jan 1978 A
4070189 Kelley et al. Jan 1978 A
4080315 Login Mar 1978 A
4081419 Shimizu et al. Mar 1978 A
4093676 Weipert et al. Jun 1978 A
4098842 Login Jul 1978 A
4104443 Latta et al. Aug 1978 A
4119094 Micklus et al. Oct 1978 A
4125110 Hymes Nov 1978 A
4147550 Campbell et al. Apr 1979 A
4152307 Shibahara et al. May 1979 A
4181752 Martens et al. Jan 1980 A
4191743 Klemm et al. Mar 1980 A
4226232 Spence Oct 1980 A
4226748 Matsunaga et al. Oct 1980 A
4229554 Newkirk et al. Oct 1980 A
4234381 Killam Nov 1980 A
4256800 Stockhausen et al. Mar 1981 A
4259411 Windhager et al. Mar 1981 A
4304703 Das Dec 1981 A
4306996 Windhager Dec 1981 A
4318947 Joung Mar 1982 A
4332919 Kobayashi et al. Jun 1982 A
4361623 Newkirk et al. Nov 1982 A
4366238 Yokoyama et al. Dec 1982 A
4373009 Winn Feb 1983 A
4377667 Sakurai et al. Mar 1983 A
4384078 Ohya et al. May 1983 A
4391278 Cahalan et al. Jul 1983 A
4393048 Mason, Jr. et al. Jul 1983 A
4414353 Maslanka et al. Nov 1983 A
4416668 Thompson Nov 1983 A
RE31454 Hymes Dec 1983 E
4459289 Maltz Jul 1984 A
4480075 Willis Oct 1984 A
4482680 Sheldon et al. Nov 1984 A
4500517 Luss Feb 1985 A
4506070 Ben Mar 1985 A
4515162 Yamamoto et al. May 1985 A
4515593 Norton May 1985 A
4539996 Engel Sep 1985 A
4543390 Tanaka et al. Sep 1985 A
4546140 Shih Oct 1985 A
4563184 Korol Jan 1986 A
4570629 Widra Feb 1986 A
4581821 Cahalan et al. Apr 1986 A
4617343 Walker et al. Oct 1986 A
4632881 Trotz et al. Dec 1986 A
4657006 Rawlings et al. Apr 1987 A
4659785 Nagano et al. Apr 1987 A
4668748 Hardam et al. May 1987 A
4674512 Rolf Jun 1987 A
4699146 Sieverding Oct 1987 A
4705709 Vailancourt Nov 1987 A
4722965 Wong et al. Feb 1988 A
4728323 Matson Mar 1988 A
4735991 Guioth et al. Apr 1988 A
4740546 Masuda et al. Apr 1988 A
4762862 Yada et al. Aug 1988 A
4768523 Cahalan et al. Sep 1988 A
4769013 Lorenz et al. Sep 1988 A
4777954 Keusch et al. Oct 1988 A
4791063 Hou et al. Dec 1988 A
4810567 Calcaterra et al. Mar 1989 A
4816508 Chen Mar 1989 A
4831098 Watanabe et al. May 1989 A
4841021 Katritzky et al. Jun 1989 A
4842768 Nakao et al. Jun 1989 A
4848353 Engel Jul 1989 A
4857585 Leising Aug 1989 A
4857590 Gaggar et al. Aug 1989 A
4859727 Sasaki et al. Aug 1989 A
4876278 Taylor et al. Oct 1989 A
4877687 Azegami et al. Oct 1989 A
4891306 Yokoyama et al. Jan 1990 A
4898908 Lahalih et al. Feb 1990 A
4900543 Ritter et al. Feb 1990 A
4900544 Ritter et al. Feb 1990 A
4920166 Buysch et al. Apr 1990 A
4931506 Yu Jun 1990 A
4931522 Catena Jun 1990 A
4943612 Morita et al. Jul 1990 A
4947847 Nakao et al. Aug 1990 A
4948720 Chen et al. Aug 1990 A
4954636 Merianos et al. Sep 1990 A
4957908 Nelson Sep 1990 A
4981936 Good et al. Jan 1991 A
4997697 Malhotra Mar 1991 A
4999249 Deschler et al. Mar 1991 A
5004760 Patton et al. Apr 1991 A
5006267 Vaughn et al. Apr 1991 A
5010139 Yu Apr 1991 A
5019096 Fox, Jr. et al. May 1991 A
5024840 Blakely et al. Jun 1991 A
5043195 Skrivseth Aug 1991 A
5049383 Huth et al. Sep 1991 A
5055171 Peck Oct 1991 A
5057560 Mueller Oct 1991 A
5059629 Patton et al. Oct 1991 A
5061752 Buysch et al. Oct 1991 A
5069907 Mixon et al. Dec 1991 A
5080097 Eisenberg Jan 1992 A
5081182 Robinson et al. Jan 1992 A
5082697 Patton et al. Jan 1992 A
5124076 Smuckler Jun 1992 A
5142010 Olstein Aug 1992 A
5153321 Finter et al. Oct 1992 A
5175059 Yamamoto et al. Dec 1992 A
5183576 Wood et al. Feb 1993 A
5194539 Charmot et al. Mar 1993 A
5205297 Montecalvo et al. Apr 1993 A
5247008 Michels et al. Sep 1993 A
5255979 Ferrari Oct 1993 A
5263481 Axelgaard Nov 1993 A
5264249 Perrault et al. Nov 1993 A
5269770 Conway et al. Dec 1993 A
5271943 Bogart et al. Dec 1993 A
5290894 Melrose et al. Mar 1994 A
5312863 Van Rheenen et al. May 1994 A
5314924 Lee May 1994 A
5317063 Komatsu et al. May 1994 A
5330527 Montecalvo et al. Jul 1994 A
5336717 Rolando et al. Aug 1994 A
5346956 Gnanou Sep 1994 A
5354790 Keusch et al. Oct 1994 A
5358688 Robertson Oct 1994 A
5369179 Havens Nov 1994 A
5370981 Krafft et al. Dec 1994 A
5402884 Gilman et al. Apr 1995 A
5403587 McCue et al. Apr 1995 A
5403640 Krishnan et al. Apr 1995 A
5403883 Messner et al. Apr 1995 A
5420197 Lorenz et al. May 1995 A
5421982 Ikeda et al. Jun 1995 A
5429590 Saito et al. Jul 1995 A
5432000 Young, Sr. et al. Jul 1995 A
5447643 Kelkenberg et al. Sep 1995 A
5466256 McAdams et al. Nov 1995 A
5470916 Righetti et al. Nov 1995 A
5474065 Meathrel et al. Dec 1995 A
5480717 Kundel Jan 1996 A
5489437 Marra Feb 1996 A
5494987 Imazato et al. Feb 1996 A
5498478 Hansen et al. Mar 1996 A
5509899 Fan et al. Apr 1996 A
5512329 Guire et al. Apr 1996 A
5515117 Dziabo et al. May 1996 A
5518788 Invie May 1996 A
5520180 Uy et al. May 1996 A
5520910 Hashimoto et al. May 1996 A
5525356 Jevne et al. Jun 1996 A
5533971 Phipps Jul 1996 A
5536446 Uy et al. Jul 1996 A
5536494 Park Jul 1996 A
5536861 Robertson Jul 1996 A
5563056 Swan et al. Oct 1996 A
5591799 Bott et al. Jan 1997 A
5597661 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1997 A
5599321 Conway et al. Feb 1997 A
5608021 Uchiyama et al. Mar 1997 A
5614538 Nelson, Jr. Mar 1997 A
5614586 Tang et al. Mar 1997 A
5618586 Swarup et al. Apr 1997 A
5622168 Keusch et al. Apr 1997 A
5624704 Darouiche et al. Apr 1997 A
5645968 Sacripante et al. Jul 1997 A
5646197 Martin Jul 1997 A
5654369 Tsubaki et al. Aug 1997 A
5665477 Meathrel et al. Sep 1997 A
5667913 Chen et al. Sep 1997 A
5670557 Dietz et al. Sep 1997 A
5674275 Tang et al. Oct 1997 A
5674561 Dietz et al. Oct 1997 A
5688855 Stoy et al. Nov 1997 A
5700742 Payne Dec 1997 A
5725789 Huber et al. Mar 1998 A
5773507 Incorvia et al. Jun 1998 A
5779632 Dietz et al. Jul 1998 A
5798048 Ries Aug 1998 A
5798096 Pavlyk Aug 1998 A
5800685 Perrault Sep 1998 A
5821280 Suda et al. Oct 1998 A
5830934 Krishnan Nov 1998 A
5830983 Alex et al. Nov 1998 A
5834561 Fukumoto et al. Nov 1998 A
5849045 Chen et al. Dec 1998 A
5849822 Kido et al. Dec 1998 A
5874184 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1999 A
5886098 Ueda et al. Mar 1999 A
5907017 Ober et al. May 1999 A
5916917 Suh et al. Jun 1999 A
5967714 Ottersbach et al. Oct 1999 A
5984102 Tay Nov 1999 A
5985990 Kantner et al. Nov 1999 A
5997815 Anders et al. Dec 1999 A
6013275 Konagaya et al. Jan 2000 A
6015836 Martin Jan 2000 A
6022553 Anders et al. Feb 2000 A
6024895 Shimizu et al. Feb 2000 A
6038464 Axelgaard et al. Mar 2000 A
6039940 Perrault et al. Mar 2000 A
6045919 Alex et al. Apr 2000 A
6050979 Haemmerle et al. Apr 2000 A
6090459 Jadamus et al. Jul 2000 A
6096800 Ottersbach et al. Aug 2000 A
6103368 Fukuda et al. Aug 2000 A
6114467 Ober et al. Sep 2000 A
6127105 Vandenabeele Oct 2000 A
6187856 Incorvia et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194530 Klesse et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197322 Dutkiewicz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203856 Ottersbach et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207361 Greener et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218492 Hill et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221425 Michal et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242526 Siddiqui et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248811 Ottersbach et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251967 Perichaud et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266490 Mukai et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280509 Mallow Aug 2001 B1
6319883 Graham et al. Nov 2001 B1
6358557 Wang et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368587 Anders et al. Apr 2002 B1
6410040 Melrose et al. Jun 2002 B1
6428866 Jadamus et al. Aug 2002 B1
6482781 Graham et al. Nov 2002 B2
6497868 Tanahashi Dec 2002 B1
6500981 Weipert Dec 2002 B1
6511669 Garnier et al. Jan 2003 B1
6525134 Lacroix et al. Feb 2003 B1
6537663 Chang et al. Mar 2003 B1
6559116 Godfroid et al. May 2003 B1
6583228 Nkansah et al. Jun 2003 B2
6689856 L'alloret Feb 2004 B2
6750296 Ober et al. Jun 2004 B2
6767647 Swofford et al. Jul 2004 B2
6797743 McDonald Sep 2004 B2
6800278 Perrault et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815074 Aguado et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815502 Lang et al. Nov 2004 B1
6821943 Avery et al. Nov 2004 B2
6852353 Qiu et al. Feb 2005 B2
7112559 Mayhall et al. Sep 2006 B1
8343473 Youngblood et al. Jan 2013 B2
8349300 Wells et al. Jan 2013 B2
9131683 Gisser et al. Sep 2015 B2
9289378 Karandikar et al. Mar 2016 B2
11134684 Youngblood et al. Oct 2021 B2
20010007694 Ottersbach et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010044482 Hu et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010050478 Schmitz Dec 2001 A1
20020037955 Baumann et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020081923 Artley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020086160 Qiu et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020139583 Masui et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168473 Ottersbach et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177828 Batich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030013624 Graham et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030017194 Joerger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030019813 Ottersbach et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022576 Ottersbach et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030049437 Devaney et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030068440 Ottersbach et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030091641 Tiller et al. May 2003 A1
20030108507 Clipson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030161804 Perron et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030229185 Chen et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236376 Kindt-Larsen et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040009136 Dubief et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040135967 Carney et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040202639 DeGrado et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050003163 Krishnan Jan 2005 A1
20050008676 Qiu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050008839 Cramer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013842 Qiu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050032931 Naisby et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050053569 Bavouzet et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050058844 Rubner et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065284 Krishnan Mar 2005 A1
20050101740 Mougin May 2005 A1
20060057209 Chapman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060083854 Ober et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060189710 Hayashi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070048249 Youngblood et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053867 Ober et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070106040 Ober et al. May 2007 A1
20070149694 Krishnan Jun 2007 A1
20080226584 Krishnan Sep 2008 A1
20090081367 Makuta et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090311302 Youngblood et al. Dec 2009 A1
20120046378 Sloan Feb 2012 A1
20130079481 Youngblood et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130109794 Polzin et al. May 2013 A1
20130115185 Tamareselvy et al. May 2013 A1
20130136783 Youngblood et al. May 2013 A1
20140080977 Youngblood et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140127320 Salamone et al. May 2014 A1
20150093424 Lapitsky et al. Apr 2015 A1
20160053038 Youngblood et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160262392 Youngblood et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170360688 Fevola et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180237686 Schnoor et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180340046 Hopkins et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180362678 Hopkins et al. Dec 2018 A1
20200354527 Hopkins et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200369800 Hopkins et al. Nov 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
3339662 May 1984 DE
19833062 Feb 2000 DE
19910811 Sep 2000 DE
0000426 Jan 1979 EP
0085327 Aug 1983 EP
0099209 Jan 1984 EP
0141628 May 1985 EP
0239213 Sep 1987 EP
0286009 Oct 1988 EP
0337474 Oct 1989 EP
375350 Jun 1990 EP
0204312 Aug 1990 EP
0469196 Feb 1992 EP
0604369 Jun 1994 EP
0290676 Aug 1994 EP
0747456 Dec 1996 EP
1109845 Oct 2005 EP
1299012 Dec 1972 GB
1350400 Apr 1974 GB
2091277 Jul 1982 GB
H05286811 Nov 1993 JP
2002-105152 Apr 2002 JP
WO 9112282 Aug 1991 WO
WO 9206694 Apr 1992 WO
WO 9527530 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9714448 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9715603 May 1997 WO
WO9735542 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9745468 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9819311 May 1998 WO
WO 9829463 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9851720 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9909837 Mar 1999 WO
WO 0005283 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0008077 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0071591 Nov 2000 WO
WO03028767 Apr 2003 WO
WO2004045755 Jun 2004 WO
WO2013185058 Dec 2013 WO
WO2016127387 Aug 2016 WO
WO2017003923 Jan 2017 WO
WO2018222622 Dec 2018 WO
WO2018232417 Dec 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (81)
Entry
http://beta.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/derivative (Year: 2015).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Aug. 9, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated May 12, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Sep. 12, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Advisory Action dated Sep. 29, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Request for Continued Examination dated Oct. 11, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Office Action dated May 4, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Aug. 23, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Sep. 11, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Amendment dated Sep. 13, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Amendment dated Jun. 28, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,290 Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Nov. 13, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Response dated Sep. 8, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Dec. 8, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Pre-Appeal Conference Request dated May 6, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Amendment dated Apr. 21, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Notice of Appeal dated Dec. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Mar. 21, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 9, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Feb. 9, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 15, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Aug. 15, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Appeal dated Jan. 22, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Appeal Brief dated Jun. 20, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Examiners Answer dated Aug. 14, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Reply Brief dated Oct. 14, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/992,033 Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,579 Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/993,761 Preliminary amendment dated Nov. 11, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 RCE and amendment dated Dec. 10, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 17, 2020.
PCT/US2018/034954 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 12, 2018.
PCT/US2018/038126 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2018.
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II Demand and Response to Written Opinion dated Mar. 26, 2019.
PCT/US2018/034954 Second Written Opinion dated Apr. 30, 2019.
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 3, 2019.
EP18731331.7 Response and amendment dated Jul. 24, 2020.
EP18740003.1 Response and amendment dated Oct. 28, 2020.
Abel, et al., “Preparation and Investigation of Antibacterial Carbohydrate-Based Surfaces”, Carbohydrate Research, vol. 337, No. 24; pp. 2495-2499; Nov. 29, 2002.
Allison, et al., “Hemocompatibility of Hydrophilic Antimicrobial Copolymers of Alkylated 4-Vinylpyridine” Biomacromolecules; 2007, 8; pp. 2995-2999.
Borman, “Surfaces Designed to Kill Bacteria”, Chemical & Engineering News; vol. 80, No. 22; pp. 36-38; Jun. 10, 2002.
Docherty, K., et al., “Toxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquids”, Green Chemistry, vol. 7, pp. 185-189, Mar. 14, 2005, DOI: 10.1039/b419172b.
Kawabata, et al., “Antibacterial Activity of Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymers”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology; vol. 54, No. 10; pp. 2532-2535; Oct. 1988.
Krishnan, et al., “Antibacterial Coatings Based on Quaternized Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) Block Copolymers”, Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering; vol. 91; pp. 814-815; 2004.
Kugler, R., et al., “Evidence of a Charge-Density Threshold for Optimum Efficiency of Biocidal Cationic Surfaces”, Microbiology, 151, 2005, pp. 1341-1348, DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27526-0.
Li, et al., “Bactericidal Ability of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer Under Different Conditions”; pp. 177-178; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999.
Li, et al., “Effect of the Macromolecular Chain Structure of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer on Antimicrobial Activity”; pp. 175-176; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999.
Lin, et al., “Insights Into Bactericidal Action of Surface-Attached Poly(vinyl-N-hexylpyridinium) Chains”, Biotechnology Letters, vol. 24, No. 10; pp. 801-805; May 2002.
Lin, et al., “Mechanism of Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activities of Textiles Covalently Modified With Alkylated Polyethylenimine”, Biotech. Bioeng.; vol. 83, No. 2; pp. 168-172; Jul. 20, 2003.
Napper, D.H., “Steric Stabilization”, Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Sydney, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 58, No. 2, Feb. 1977, ISSN 0021-9797, pp. 390-407.
Sellenet, et al., “Hydrophilized Pyridinium Bactericidal Polymers”, Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Washington, DC; Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2005; pp. 2.
Sellenet, et al., “Synergistic Activity of Hydrophilic Modification in Antibiotic Polymers” Biomacromolecules; 2007, vol. 8, No. 1; pp. 19-23.
Sellenet, “Hydrophilized Bactericidal Polymers”, Thesis, Purdue University, MSE, Dec. 2004; pp. 83.
Tadros, Tharwat F., “Emulsion Formation, Stability, and Rheology”, pp. 1-75, 2013.
Tiller, et al., “Designing Surfaces That Kill Bacteria on Contact”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; vol. 98, No. 11; pp. 5981-5985; May 22, 2001.
Tiller, et al., “Polymer Surfaces Derivatized With Poly(Vinyl-N-Hexylpyridinium) Kill Airborne and Waterborne Bacteria”; Biotechnology and Bioengineering;vol. 79, No. 4; pp. 465-471; Aug. 20, 2002.
Waschinski, C., et al., “poly(oxazoline)s with Telechelic Antimicrobial Functions”, Biomacromolecules 2005, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 235-243.
Wynne, et al., “Novel Polymer Bound Bactericidal Surfaces”; vol. 45, No. 2; pp. 521-522; Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Philadelphia, PA; Aug. 22-27, 2004.
Alternative Medicine Review, Undecylenic Acid Monograph, vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, pp. 68-70.
Selected Abstracts; Dec. 2004-Mar. 2005; pp. 3.
Surface Industry, Detergent Raw Material, Sodium Tripolyphosphate 94.0% (STPP Industrial Grade), pp. 1-2, XP055579364.
XP002783622, Database WPI, Week 199349, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, AN 1993-389137, pp. 4.
Oxford Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th Edition, 2008, pp. 134-135 and 203.
“Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)”, USDA Technical Evaluation Report, May 26, 2017, pp. 1-21.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2022.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210084898 A1 Mar 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60711234 Aug 2005 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14837900 Aug 2015 US
Child 15163285 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15163285 May 2016 US
Child 17115709 US
Parent 11509915 Aug 2006 US
Child 14837900 US