There is an ever-growing demand for materials suitable for killing harmful microorganisms. Such materials could be used to coat surfaces of common objects touched by people to render them antiseptic so as to prevent transmission of bacterial infections or to facilitate the killing of microorganisms in solution.
Various polycations are known to have bactericidal properties. However, their bactericidal properties can be strongly influenced by whether the polycation or a composition containing the polycation is soluble. In some instances, the bactericidal property is most apparent in an insoluble form, which is not particularly amenable to killing microorganisms. In other instances, the bactericidal activity is lost when the polycation is cross-linked or otherwise rendered insoluble. Application of bactericidal polymers may also be limited by their use in brushes, their insolubility in solution, or by their unfavorable biocompatibility characteristics. Accordingly, there is a need for bactericidal formulations possessing having improved bactericidal, hydrophilicity/wettability and biocompatibility characteristics suitable for rendering materials or areas bactericidal and for killing airborne and/or waterborne microorganisms.
The present invention is directed to polymeric compositions providing improved bactericidal, hydrophilicity/wettability, and biocompatibility characteristics. In particular, the present invention provides a bactericidal composition, including a hydrophilic first comonomer polymerized to a second comonomer to form a polymeric composition, where the polymeric composition is more soluble and/or more bactericidal in an aqueous solution than either of the first comonomer or the second comonomer alone.
In a particular example, the present invention provides a quaternized bactericidal composition, in which poly(4-vinylpyridine) (PVP) is copolymerized with hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) or poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate (PEGMA).
In another example, the present invention provides a method for rendering a material or area bactericidal in which a bactericidal composition of the present invention is applied to a medium or device in an amount suitable for killing or significantly reducing the number of bacteria in or on the treated medium or device compared to an untreated medium or device.
In another example, the present invention provides a method for killing or significantly reducing the number of bacteria on a material or area treated with a bactericidal composition of the present invention.
In a further example, the present invention provides a method for identifying a polymer having suitable bactericidal activity in which a hydrophilic first comonomer is polymerized to a second comonomer to form a bactericidal polymeric composition, where the polymeric composition is determined to have suitable bactericidal activity if the polymeric composition has a higher bactericidal activity in an aqueous solution than either of the hydrophilic first comonomer or second comonomer alone (or treated similarly as the polymeric composition).
Applications for the inventive compositions include their use in catheters, needles, sutures, stents and other implantable medical devices, contact lenses, root canal fillers, wound dressings, burn dressings, tissue culture plates, and the like.
In order to provide a clearer and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, the following definitions are provided. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
The term “monomer” refers to a relatively simple compound, usually containing carbon and of low molecular weight, which can react to form a polymer by combining with itself or with other monomers.
The terms “polymer” and “polymeric composition” are used interchangeably to denote a product of a polymerization reaction, and are inclusive of homopolymers, copolymers, terpolymers, etc.
The terms “polymerization” and “polymerization reaction” are inclusive of homopolymerizations, copolymerizations, terpolymerizations, and the like, and include all types of copolymerizations such as random, graft, block, and the like. In general, the polymers in the bactericidal composition on may be prepared in accordance with any suitable polymerization process, including slurry polymerization, solution polymerization, emulsion polymerization, gas phase polymerization, and high pressure polymerization and the like.
The term “comonomer” refers to a monomer, copolymer, or polymer which can copolymerize with itself or with at least one different monomer, copolymer, or polymer in a copolymerization reaction, the result of which can be a polymer, copolymer or polymeric composition.
The term “copolymer” refers to a polymer which can copolymerize with itself or with at least one different comonomer, polymer, or copolymer in a polymerization reaction or it can refer to a product resulting from a polymerization reaction of two comonomers. The copolymer may be identified or named in terms of the monomer(s) from which the copolymer is produced.
The terms “corresponding comonomer,” “corresponding copolymer,” and “corresponding polymer” are used to relate comonomers, copolymers, or polymers, respectively, sharing a common set of monomeric units between e.g. distinct polymeric compositions. The common comonomers, copolymers, or polymer need not be identical in terms of the molecular weight(s) or molar ratio(s) of commonly shared monomeric units.
The phrase “corresponding molecular weight” is used to relate molecular weight(s) of corresponding comonomers, copolymers, or polymers, respectively, in distinct polymeric compositions in which the common comonomers, copolymers, or polymers differ from one another by molecular weight(s) or commonly shared monomeric units within the corresponding comonomer, copolymer or polymer.
The phrase “corresponding molar ratio” is used to relate molar ratio(s) of corresponding comonomers, copolymers, or polymers, respectively, in distinct polymeric compositions in which the common comonomers, copolymers, or polymers differ from one another by molar ratio(s) or commonly shared monomeric units within the corresponding comonomer, copolymer or polymer.
The term “bactericidal” is used to interchangeably denote any one of the following: (i) a comonomer, polymer, copolymer, polymeric composition suitably formulated to kill, reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of one or more bacteria; (ii) a material, substance, medium, device, or area treated with a bactericidal comonomer, polymer, copolymer, polymeric composition so as to kill, reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of one or more bacteria.
The term “aqueous solution” refers to a solution in which water is the solvent.
The term “medium” refers to a treatable material, treatable substance, treatable device, or treatable area in which “treatable” refers to a capacity to be rendered bactericidal by a bactericidal comonomer, polymer, or copolymer. A treatable medium may have a defined physical form, but may include liquid (e.g., water, aqueous solution) or gaseous materials (e.g., air) also.
The phrases “significantly reducing the growth of bacteria” and “significantly reducing bacterial growth” are used interchangeably to denote one or more of the following conditions, including (i) a condition in which the metabolic activity of at least 50% of the microorganisms of a particular type exposed to a treated medium is terminated or reduced compared to bacteria of that particular type exposed to an untreated medium over a fixed period of time; (ii) a condition where there is 50% or less of one or more bacterial types present in and/or on a treated medium compared to the number of bacteria exposed to an untreated medium; and/or (iii) a condition resulting when one or more types of bacteria adhere 50% less to a treated medium compared to an untreated medium. The degree of bacterial growth reduction with respective to conditions (i)-(iii) may range from 50% to greater 99.9%.
The phrase “significantly bactericidal” denotes a comonomer, polymer, copolymer, composition, polymeric composition, material, substance or treated area in which the bactericidal comonomer, polymer, copolymer, composition, polymeric composition, material, substance or treated area is suitably formulated to significantly reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of bacteria by at least 50%.
The term “biocompatible” refers to a material that is substantially non-toxic in the in vivo environment of its intended use, and that is not substantially rejected by the patient's physiological system (i.e., is non-antigenic). This can be gauged by the ability of a material to pass the biocompatibility tests set forth in International Standards Organization (ISO) Standard No. 10993 and/or the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) 23 and/or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blue book memorandum No. G95-1, entitled “Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing.” Typically, these tests measure a material's toxicity, infectivity, pyrogenicity, irritation potential, reactivity, hemolytic activity, carcinogenicity and/or immunogenicity. A biocompatible structure or material, when introduced into a majority of patients, will not cause a significantly adverse, long-lived or escalating biological reaction or response, and is distinguished from a mild, transient inflammation which typically accompanies surgery or implantation of foreign objects into a living organism.
A bactericidal polymeric composition of the present invention includes a hydrophilic first comonomer polymerized to a second comonomer, where the polymeric composition is more soluble and/or more bactericidal in an aqueous solution than either of the first comonomer or the second comonomer alone. The polymeric composition of the present invention was found to have unexpected hydophilizing and/or wettabiliy properties providing enhanced bactericidal activity compared to either comonomer alone.
The second comonomer may be inherently bactericidal or it may be rendered bactericidal after a subsequent step (e.g., polymerization) and/or chemical modification (e.g., quaternization) of alkyl groups. Where the polymeric composition is further modified by chemical modification, such as quaternization, preferably, the polymeric composition is more hydrophilic and/or bactericidal than a similarly modified (by e.g., quaternization) second comonomer alone.
Bactericidal comonomers or those capable of being rendered bactericidal are copolymerized to a hydrophilizing comonomer. Exemplary second comonomers for polymerization to a hydrophilizing comonomer may include a variety of vinyl monomers capable of free radical polymerization and/or quaternization. Accordingly, these comonomers may include, but are not limited to, vinyl amines, such as N,N-dimethylvinylamine; allyl amines; vinyl esters, such as vinyl acetate; alkyl acrylates; and vinyl chloride. In a preferred embodiment, a pyridinium-type comonomer, such as vinyl pyridine or 4-vinylpyridine, is quaternized after polymerization to a hydrophilizing comonomer.
The second comonomer composition may include or be chemically linked to a suitable bactericidal moiety, including, but not limited to polycationic species, polycationic derivatives or combinations therefrom. Polycationic species may contain two or more quaternary ammonium groups with a molecular weight ranging from several hundred Daltons to a few hundred thousand Daltons. The quaternary ammonium groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyionenes, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), dimethylamine-epichlorohydrin copolymers and imidazole-epichlorohydrin copolymers. Suitable bactericidal comonomers for use in the present invention may include the quaternary ammonium group-containing polymers disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,482,680, which are incorporated by reference herein.
Polycationic species may contain two or more amine groups. The amine groups can be primary, secondary, tertiary, or mixtures thereof. The amine groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyethyleneimines, polypropyleneimines, polyvinylamines, polyallylamines, polydiallylamines, polyamidoamines, polyaminoalkylmethacrylates, polylysines, and mixtures thereof.
The polycationic species may also be a modified polyamine with at least one amine group substituted with at least one other functional group. Examples include ethoxylated and alkoxylated polyamines and alkylated polyamines. Other suitable bactericidal comonomers or those that may be rendered bactericidal may be identified and/or used in accordance with the applications and objectives set forth in the specification and claims.
Quaternization may be carried out using alkylating agents, including but not limited to alkyl halides (such as hexyl bromide), alkyl sulfonates, alkyl mesylates, alkyl tosylates, or other alkylating agents possessing a suitable leaving group. Quaternization reduces self-polymerization of the bactericidal comonomer upon polymerization with the hydrophilizing comonomer. Quaternization may confer increased bactericidal activity and is typically carried out after polymerization, since quaternized polymers are unpolymerizable.
Quaternized alkyl groups and/or other cationic chains may be attracted to and/or promote interaction and penetration negatively charged bacterial cell walls on account of their lipophilic nature. Alkyl chain lengths of quaternizing agents and overall hydrophilic/lipophilic balance may affect bactericidal activity of the polymeric compositions of the present invention. Accordingly, these variables may be modified to optimize or improve bactericidal activity of the polymeric compositions.
Hydrophilizing comonomers of the present invention confer increased wettability or hydrophilicity to one or more surfaces of the polymeric composition in aqueous solutions, including water. Preferably, the polymeric composition is more wettable than a bactericidal comonomer or a comonomer rendered bactericidal by quaternization, such as poly(4-vinylpyridine). Suitable hydrophilizing monomers or copolymers, may include, but are not limited to, ethylene glycol (ethylene oxide); polyethylene glycol derivatives, including poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), poly(ethyleneglycol) acrylate, and vinyl polyethylene glycol; vinyl acetate; poly(vinyl alcohol); vinyl pyrrolidone and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone); vinyl pyrrolidinone and poly(vinyl pyrrolininone); vinyl oxazoline and poly(vinyl oxazoline); vinyl formamide and poly(vinyl formamide); hydroxyalkyl acrylates and hydroxyalkyl methacrylates, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and hydroxyethyl acrylate; methacrylamide; acrylamide and methacrylamide based monomers, such as acrylamide, N,N-dimethyl acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and hydroxymethyl acrylamide; monomers containing one or more of the following functional groups: hydroxy, amino, ammonium, ether, carboxylate, amide, and sulfonamide groups; and combinations or copolymers thereof. polyvinyloxazolines
Hydrophilic polymeric compositions and methods for hydrophilizing polymeric materials, including the use of high energy treatments, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 20050008839, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety, also may be used.
Preferably, the hydrophilizing comonomer is biocompatible. Standard assays may be utilized to evaluate biocompatibility, including but not limited to viability/cytotoxicity mammalian cell assays and the like. Representative hydrophilizing comonomers or copolymers include hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate (PEGMA).
HEMA is widely used in biomedical applications and devices, most prominently soft contact lenses. HEMA, with 37.8% water per weight, is typical of hydrogels. Preferably, the molar ratio of HEMA comonomer in the polymeric composition is equal to or greater than about 90 to 1.
PEGMA is a biocompatible polymer which possesses several important properties, such as good solubility in both organic and aqueous media, low toxicity, immunogenicity and nonbiodegradability.
Preferably, the molar molecular weight of PEGMA comonomer in the bactericidal composition is equal to or greater than 300, more preferably between about 300 and about 2000, including but not limited to 1100. Preferably, the molar ratio of PEGMA comonomer in the polymeric composition is equal to or less than about 10 to 1; equal to or less than about 25 to 1; equal to or greater than about 75 to 1; equal to or greater than about 95 to 1; equal to or greater than about 99 to 1.
Hydrophilicity or wettability can be evaluated by any suitable methodology known in the art, including contact angle testing and tensionometry testing. Contact angle testing of polymeric compositions may be carried out by dip coating microscope slides in solutions with copolymer dissolved in chloroform and methanol and obtaining contact angle measurements using e.g., a Ramé-Hart Advanced Goniometer. Contact angles may be characterized as advancing or receding, the difference being whether or not the angle is taken when moving onto a dry surface or moving off a wet surface. Advancing angles may be used for surface energy determinations, receding angles for characterizing other surface characteristics.
Polymeric bactericidal compositions may be rendered hydrophilic by engineering them to have advancing contact angles with water of less than or equal to about 90 degrees, preferably less than or equal to about 45 degrees, more preferably less than or equal to about 30 degrees, less than or equal to 15 degrees after 30 seconds of spreading.
The disclosed bactericidal compositions are suitably formulated to significantly reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of bacteria. A bactericidal composition may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial growth from a treated medium by a factor of at least 50%. Further, a bactericidal composition may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial growth from a treated medium by at least 60%, by at least 70%, by at least 80%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 99%, or by at least 99.9%.
The bactericidal composition may be applied as a coating to at least one portion or surface of a medium or medical device, including but not limited to catheters, needles, stents, and other implantable medical devices. Various methods may be used to apply the comonomers or bactericidal polymers as a coating to the surface of the medical device. Suitable methods for applying coatings may include, but are not limited to the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,509,899 and 6,221,425, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Comonomers may be applied to a surface and subsequently polymerized. Alternatively, the bactericidal polymer composition may be applied directly to the surface of the medical device. In particular, one or more comonomers or bactericidal polymers may be combined with water and sprayed onto the medical device. Alternatively, the medical device may be dipped into a solution containing the bactericidal polymer. The comonomer or bactericidal polymer may be present in the solution in an amount from about 50% to about 98% by weight, particularly from about 70% to about 90% by weight, and applied to the surface of the medical device.
The viscosity of the monomeric or polymeric solution can be adjusted depending upon the particular application and circumstances. In general, when dipping the medical device into the solution, higher viscosities will cause more of the bactericidal polymer to remain on the surface of the device. Thus, if thicker coatings are desired, the viscosity can be increased. The viscosity of the solution can be increased by minimizing the amount of water in the solution. Additionally, thickeners, such as a polyacrylamide, can be added to the solution. The viscosity of the solution may also be increased by partially polymerizing the monomer.
In another example, the present invention provides methods for rendering a material or area bactericidal. In a further example, the present invention provides a method for killing or significantly reducing the number of bacteria on a material or area treated with a bactericidal composition of the present invention.
Accordingly, in one example, a bactericidal composition of the present invention is applied to a medium or medical device in an amount sufficient to kill or significantly reducing the number of bacteria in or on the treated medium compared to an untreated medium. In a further example, a bactericidal composition according to the present invention is applied to a medium or medical device in an amount sufficient to kill at least one bacterium or significantly reduce bacterial growth compared to an untreated medium.
The bacteria may be Gram-positive or Gram-negative. The bactericidal composition may be included in or coated onto a catheter, stent, implantable medical device, contact lens, root canal filler, or wound dressing. The treated medium may include natural or synthetic materials, implantable devices, or bodily surfaces. The treated medium may be contact with an aqueous environment, such as water or the inside of a patient or other vertebrate organism. Alternatively, the treated medium may be contact with air or air and/or air borne bacteria in an external environment or an enclosed bodily organ, such as lung.
Biocompatibility may be evaluated by any suitable methodology known in the art, including biocompatibility tests set forth in International Standards Organization (ISO) Standard No. 10993 and/or the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) 23 and/or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blue book memorandum No. G95-1, entitled “Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing.” In addition, any of the viability/cytotoxicity assays known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be used to evaluate lack of toxicity for normal human cells.
In a further example, the present invention provides a method for identifying a polymer having suitable bactericidal activity. In this method, a hydrophilizing first comonomer may be polymerized to a second comonomer and a bactericidal polymeric composition is formed. The bactericidal polymeric composition may be applied to a medium to form a first treated medium and the medium may be separately treated with the second comonomer used in the first treated medium. The first treated medium and the second treated medium may be separately contacted with a plurality of bacteria. Whether the first treated medium is more bactericidal than the second treated medium may be determined.
In a further example, a first polymeric composition and a second polymeric composition differing by molecular weight with regard to one or more corresponding comonomers may be separately applied to a medium and tested to identify a polymeric composition having improved bactericidal activity.
Alternatively, a first polymeric composition and a second polymeric composition differing by molar ratio of their corresponding comonomers may be varied and may be separately applied to a medium and tested to identify a polymeric composition having improved bactericidal activity.
In the above disclosed methods, a given polymeric composition may be rendered bactericidal by quaternization after polymerizing the hydrophilizing first comonomer to the second comonomer. Accordingly, the quaternized polymeric composition would be deemed suitable for use in a bactericidal composition if a medium containing or treated with the quaternized polymeric composition is more hydrophilic and/or bactericidal than the same medium containing or treated with the quaternized second comonomer alone.
Bactericidal activity may be evaluated using any suitable testing methodology used in the art, including, but not limited to, luminescence, optical density, or microscopic evaluation of bacterial growth or viability of coated and/or stained microscopic slides, plates or cultures.
The following examples illustrate features in accordance with the present invention, and are provided solely by way of illustration. They are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims or their equivalents.
1. Radical Polymerization and Quaternization. Copolymers possessing suitable bactericidal properties and a suitable hydrophilicity/biocompatibility profile were obtained using a quaternized polymeric composition synthesized from 4-vinylpyridine and a biocompatible, hydrophilic comonomer, such as hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) or poly(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate.
Copolymers were synthesized by radical copolymerization with AIBN as initiator. The reactants were stirred at 70° C. for 48 hours under flowing N2 to prevent oxidation. As the monomer contents were varied, the AIBN proportion was held constant to a mass ratio VP+PEGMA:AIBN equal to 22:1. To investigate the effects of hydrophilization, seven different compositions of VP with PEGMA300, PEGMA1100 and HEMA were synthesized, containing a molar percentage of VP of 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 95 and 99.
Copolymers were quaternized with a 3-fold excess of hexyl bromide (HB) in a mixture of chloroform and methanol by reflux for 48 hr. They were precipitated in hexane, recovered and dried under vacuum. A schematic of the radical polymerization and quaternization process can be seen in
Synthesis of P(VP-co-HEMA), P(VP-co-PEGMA300) and P(VP-co-PEGMA1100) was followed with FTIR and NMR. Spectroscopy showed that the synthesis was successful and that the quaternization went to near completion and that the resultant products were relatively pure after work-up.
VP, HEMA and PEGMA were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Co. (Milwaukee, USA). To avoid polymerization through heat or light, these monomers were inhibited with hydroquinone (HQ), 4-Methoxyphenol (MEHQ), and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) respectively. The HQ and MEHQ inhibitors were removed by means of trap to trap while BHT was purified from PEGMA by column chromatography on silica gel (70-270 mesh) stationary phase.
2. Contact Angle and Bactericidal Testing. To evaluate wettability or hydrophilicity, contact angle tests were conducted by dip coating microscope slides in solutions with copolymer dissolved in chloroform and methanol. Contact angle measurements were obtained on a Ramé-Hart Advanced Goniometer.
Bactericidal tests were performed with a small quantity of the bacteria Escherichia coli O157:H7 in which the lux gene was added for luminescence, which provides a measure of metabolic growth or activity. A sample was taken from a culture and placed in contact with the coated slides, by means of a pipette. The intensity of the bioluminescence was recorded as a function of time for two hours with a photomultiplier tube. Reduced bioluminescence correlates with enhanced bactericidal activity.
3. Bactericidal activity of P(VP-co-HEMA). The results of the bactericidal tests on quaternized copolymers of VP and HEMA are shown in
P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 95/5 and P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 90/10 exhibited enhanced bactericidal activity compared to PVP-HB alone. The luminescence recorded for P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 99/1, is similar to, but slightly less than that observed for PVP-HB alone. Accordingly, this copolymer, having one molar percent HEMA, displays properties similar to PVP-HB alone. However, a slide coated with P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 99/1 kills bacteria faster than one coated with PVP-HB.
The wettability of dry, vitreous HEMA-based materials was studied by contact angle measurements. The results for both advancing and receding angles are given in
Although not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that coupling hydrophilization to bactericidal activity in the polymer facilitates enhances bacterial killing, in part because of the water-loving nature of bacteria: a hydrophilic growth medium is better able to support uptake and killing by a hydrophilized bactericidal polymer compared to an unhydrophilized bactericidal polymer. Moreover, it is believed that the bactericidal polymers are electrostatically attracted to the bacterial cell wall whereby lipophilic side chains insert into the bacterial cell membrane, disrupting it so that holes form therein.
In P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 90/10, the wettability effect is particularly evident. This polymer exhibits a more optimal bactericidal activity, reflected in the fact that all bacteria were killed in 30 minutes. This further illustrates that that a slide coated with P(VP-co-HEMA)-HB 90/10 copolymer is significantly more bactericidal than pure PVP-HB.
4. Bactericidal activity of P(VP-co-PEGMA). The bacterial growth behavior for copolymers with PEGMA1100 can be seen in
P(VP-co-PEGMA1100)-HB 25/75 and 10/90 displayed a surprisingly high antibacterial activity. Although counterintuitive, this fact can have several explanations. The molecular weight of P(VP-co-PEGMA1100)-HB 10/90 is much higher than other copolymer formulations of this system. This could increase bactericidal activity, because the copolymer possesses more alkyl tails to traverse the bacterial membranes. The enhanced water wettability of the polymer may enable the polymer to better dissolve in and/or surround the bacteria in an aqueous medium, so as to facilitate more efficient bacterial killing.
PPEGMA300 (graph not shown) alone does not kill bacteria and actually improves growth due to its biocompatibility and hydrophilicity. The improved biocompatibility and hydrophilicity is carried over into the P(VP-co-PEGMA300) copolymers with ratios from 0/100 to 50/50 thereby improving bacterial growth. However, for ratios greater 50/50, bactericidal activity was observed. The optimum balance between spreading and VP content was found to be 75/25, in which half the bacteria were killed in the first 15 minutes. Overall, the bactericidal behavior of the PEGMA300 based polymers were reduced compared to PEGMA1100 based polymers.
PEGMA1100 has a significantly larger PEG size than PEGMA300. A smaller fraction of PEGMA1100 is thus necessary to hydrophilize P(VP-co-PEGMA1100). However, even for some similarly hydrophilized polymers, the PEGMA1100 materials exhibit superior bactericidal activity, possibly due to the enhanced protein resistance imparted by longer PEG chains in the polymers.
The enhanced bactericidal activity exhibited by the HEMA and PEGMA copolymers appears to result from enhanced wettability in aqueous solutions, allowing the polymer to better surround and/or gain access to the bacteria, so as to enhance bacterial killing.
5. Cytotoxity of P(VP-co-PEGMA). A viability/cytotoxicity assay may be used to evaluate biocompatibility of the bactericidal polymers for mammalian cells. In particular,
Live cells were distinguished from dead cells using a fluorescence-based LIVE/DEAD viability/cytotoxicity assay system (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Detection Technologies). The assay system includes two probes, calcein AM, a fluorogenic esterase substrate producing a green fluorescent product in live cells having intracellular esterase activity, and ethidium homodimer-1, a high-affinity, red fluorescent dye only able to pass through and stain the compromised membranes of dead cells.
It is to be understood that the above-described polymers and methods for their use are merely representative embodiments illustrating the principles of this invention and that other variations in the polymers or methods, may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. The foregoing detailed description and accompanying drawings have been provided solely by way of explanation and illustration, and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims. Many variations in the presently preferred embodiments illustrated herein will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, and remain within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/163,285 filed May 24, 2016, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 14/837,900 filed Aug. 27, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/509,915 filed Aug. 24, 2006, and this application also claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/711,234, filed Aug. 24, 2005, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as if put forth in full below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2717887 | Saner | Sep 1955 | A |
2882157 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2972535 | Laakso et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
3140227 | Roth et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3227672 | Fertig et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3262807 | Sterman et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3296167 | Turner et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3296196 | Lamoreaux | Jan 1967 | A |
3328328 | Scanley | Jun 1967 | A |
3450794 | Ebneth et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3592805 | Szabo et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3597313 | Coscia et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3619200 | Ferguson et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3753716 | Ishihara et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3871376 | Kozak | Mar 1975 | A |
3872128 | Byck | Mar 1975 | A |
3898188 | Rembaum et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3929741 | Laskey | Dec 1975 | A |
3975350 | Hudgin et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4011178 | Muse | Mar 1977 | A |
4017440 | Killam | Apr 1977 | A |
4026941 | Login et al. | May 1977 | A |
4029694 | Weipert et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4069365 | Rembaum | Jan 1978 | A |
4070189 | Kelley et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4080315 | Login | Mar 1978 | A |
4081419 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4093676 | Weipert et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4098842 | Login | Jul 1978 | A |
4104443 | Latta et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4119094 | Micklus et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4125110 | Hymes | Nov 1978 | A |
4147550 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4152307 | Shibahara et al. | May 1979 | A |
4181752 | Martens et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4191743 | Klemm et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4226232 | Spence | Oct 1980 | A |
4226748 | Matsunaga et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4229554 | Newkirk et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4234381 | Killam | Nov 1980 | A |
4256800 | Stockhausen et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259411 | Windhager et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4304703 | Das | Dec 1981 | A |
4306996 | Windhager | Dec 1981 | A |
4318947 | Joung | Mar 1982 | A |
4332919 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4361623 | Newkirk et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4366238 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373009 | Winn | Feb 1983 | A |
4377667 | Sakurai et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4384078 | Ohya et al. | May 1983 | A |
4391278 | Cahalan et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4393048 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4414353 | Maslanka et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4416668 | Thompson | Nov 1983 | A |
RE31454 | Hymes | Dec 1983 | E |
4459289 | Maltz | Jul 1984 | A |
4480075 | Willis | Oct 1984 | A |
4482680 | Sheldon et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4500517 | Luss | Feb 1985 | A |
4506070 | Ben | Mar 1985 | A |
4515162 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1985 | A |
4515593 | Norton | May 1985 | A |
4539996 | Engel | Sep 1985 | A |
4543390 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4546140 | Shih | Oct 1985 | A |
4563184 | Korol | Jan 1986 | A |
4570629 | Widra | Feb 1986 | A |
4581821 | Cahalan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4617343 | Walker et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4632881 | Trotz et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4657006 | Rawlings et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4659785 | Nagano et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4668748 | Hardam et al. | May 1987 | A |
4674512 | Rolf | Jun 1987 | A |
4699146 | Sieverding | Oct 1987 | A |
4705709 | Vailancourt | Nov 1987 | A |
4722965 | Wong et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4728323 | Matson | Mar 1988 | A |
4735991 | Guioth et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4740546 | Masuda et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4762862 | Yada et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768523 | Cahalan et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4769013 | Lorenz et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4777954 | Keusch et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4791063 | Hou et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4810567 | Calcaterra et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816508 | Chen | Mar 1989 | A |
4831098 | Watanabe et al. | May 1989 | A |
4841021 | Katritzky et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842768 | Nakao et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848353 | Engel | Jul 1989 | A |
4857585 | Leising | Aug 1989 | A |
4857590 | Gaggar et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4859727 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4876278 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877687 | Azegami et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4891306 | Yokoyama et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4898908 | Lahalih et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900543 | Ritter et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900544 | Ritter et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4920166 | Buysch et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4931506 | Yu | Jun 1990 | A |
4931522 | Catena | Jun 1990 | A |
4943612 | Morita et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947847 | Nakao et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4948720 | Chen et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954636 | Merianos et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4957908 | Nelson | Sep 1990 | A |
4981936 | Good et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997697 | Malhotra | Mar 1991 | A |
4999249 | Deschler et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004760 | Patton et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5006267 | Vaughn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5010139 | Yu | Apr 1991 | A |
5019096 | Fox, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024840 | Blakely et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5043195 | Skrivseth | Aug 1991 | A |
5049383 | Huth et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5055171 | Peck | Oct 1991 | A |
5057560 | Mueller | Oct 1991 | A |
5059629 | Patton et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061752 | Buysch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069907 | Mixon et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080097 | Eisenberg | Jan 1992 | A |
5081182 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5082697 | Patton et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5124076 | Smuckler | Jun 1992 | A |
5142010 | Olstein | Aug 1992 | A |
5153321 | Finter et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5175059 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5183576 | Wood et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5194539 | Charmot et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5205297 | Montecalvo et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5247008 | Michels et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5255979 | Ferrari | Oct 1993 | A |
5263481 | Axelgaard | Nov 1993 | A |
5264249 | Perrault et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269770 | Conway et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271943 | Bogart et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5290894 | Melrose et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312863 | Van Rheenen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314924 | Lee | May 1994 | A |
5317063 | Komatsu et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330527 | Montecalvo et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336717 | Rolando et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346956 | Gnanou | Sep 1994 | A |
5354790 | Keusch et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358688 | Robertson | Oct 1994 | A |
5369179 | Havens | Nov 1994 | A |
5370981 | Krafft et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5402884 | Gilman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403587 | McCue et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403640 | Krishnan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403883 | Messner et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5420197 | Lorenz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421982 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429590 | Saito et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432000 | Young, Sr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447643 | Kelkenberg et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5466256 | McAdams et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470916 | Righetti et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474065 | Meathrel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480717 | Kundel | Jan 1996 | A |
5489437 | Marra | Feb 1996 | A |
5494987 | Imazato et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498478 | Hansen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5509899 | Fan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512329 | Guire et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515117 | Dziabo et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518788 | Invie | May 1996 | A |
5520180 | Uy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520910 | Hashimoto et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525356 | Jevne et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533971 | Phipps | Jul 1996 | A |
5536446 | Uy et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536494 | Park | Jul 1996 | A |
5536861 | Robertson | Jul 1996 | A |
5563056 | Swan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5591799 | Bott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597661 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599321 | Conway et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608021 | Uchiyama et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614538 | Nelson, Jr. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614586 | Tang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618586 | Swarup et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622168 | Keusch et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624704 | Darouiche et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5645968 | Sacripante et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646197 | Martin | Jul 1997 | A |
5654369 | Tsubaki et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665477 | Meathrel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667913 | Chen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670557 | Dietz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674275 | Tang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674561 | Dietz et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688855 | Stoy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700742 | Payne | Dec 1997 | A |
5725789 | Huber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5773507 | Incorvia et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779632 | Dietz et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798048 | Ries | Aug 1998 | A |
5798096 | Pavlyk | Aug 1998 | A |
5800685 | Perrault | Sep 1998 | A |
5821280 | Suda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830934 | Krishnan | Nov 1998 | A |
5830983 | Alex et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834561 | Fukumoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849045 | Chen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849822 | Kido et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874184 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886098 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907017 | Ober et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916917 | Suh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5967714 | Ottersbach et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984102 | Tay | Nov 1999 | A |
5985990 | Kantner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997815 | Anders et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013275 | Konagaya et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015836 | Martin | Jan 2000 | A |
6022553 | Anders et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024895 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038464 | Axelgaard et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039940 | Perrault et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045919 | Alex et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050979 | Haemmerle et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6090459 | Jadamus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096800 | Ottersbach et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103368 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114467 | Ober et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127105 | Vandenabeele | Oct 2000 | A |
6187856 | Incorvia et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194530 | Klesse et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197322 | Dutkiewicz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203856 | Ottersbach et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207361 | Greener et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218492 | Hill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221425 | Michal et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242526 | Siddiqui et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248811 | Ottersbach et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251967 | Perichaud et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266490 | Mukai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280509 | Mallow | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319883 | Graham et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358557 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368587 | Anders et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6410040 | Melrose et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428866 | Jadamus et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6482781 | Graham et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497868 | Tanahashi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500981 | Weipert | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511669 | Garnier et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525134 | Lacroix et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537663 | Chang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559116 | Godfroid et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583228 | Nkansah et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6689856 | L'alloret | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6750296 | Ober et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767647 | Swofford et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6797743 | McDonald | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800278 | Perrault et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6815074 | Aguado et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815502 | Lang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6821943 | Avery et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852353 | Qiu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7112559 | Mayhall et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
8343473 | Youngblood et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349300 | Wells et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9131683 | Gisser et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9289378 | Karandikar et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
11134684 | Youngblood et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
20010007694 | Ottersbach et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010044482 | Hu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010050478 | Schmitz | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020037955 | Baumann et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020081923 | Artley et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086160 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020139583 | Masui et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168473 | Ottersbach et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177828 | Batich et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030013624 | Graham et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017194 | Joerger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019813 | Ottersbach et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022576 | Ottersbach et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030049437 | Devaney et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068440 | Ottersbach et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091641 | Tiller et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108507 | Clipson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030161804 | Perron et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030229185 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236376 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009136 | Dubief et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040135967 | Carney et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202639 | DeGrado et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050003163 | Krishnan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008676 | Qiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008839 | Cramer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013842 | Qiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032931 | Naisby et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053569 | Bavouzet et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058844 | Rubner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065284 | Krishnan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101740 | Mougin | May 2005 | A1 |
20060057209 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083854 | Ober et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060189710 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070048249 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053867 | Ober et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106040 | Ober et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149694 | Krishnan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080226584 | Krishnan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090081367 | Makuta et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090311302 | Youngblood et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120046378 | Sloan | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130079481 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130109794 | Polzin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115185 | Tamareselvy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136783 | Youngblood et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140080977 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140127320 | Salamone et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150093424 | Lapitsky et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160053038 | Youngblood et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160262392 | Youngblood et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170360688 | Fevola et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180237686 | Schnoor et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180340046 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180362678 | Hopkins et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20200354527 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200369800 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3339662 | May 1984 | DE |
19833062 | Feb 2000 | DE |
19910811 | Sep 2000 | DE |
0000426 | Jan 1979 | EP |
0085327 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0099209 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0141628 | May 1985 | EP |
0239213 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0286009 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0337474 | Oct 1989 | EP |
375350 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0204312 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0469196 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0604369 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0290676 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0747456 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1109845 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1299012 | Dec 1972 | GB |
1350400 | Apr 1974 | GB |
2091277 | Jul 1982 | GB |
H05286811 | Nov 1993 | JP |
2002-105152 | Apr 2002 | JP |
WO 9112282 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9206694 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9527530 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9714448 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9715603 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9735542 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9745468 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9819311 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9829463 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9851720 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9909837 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0005283 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008077 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0071591 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO03028767 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO2004045755 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2013185058 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO2016127387 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO2017003923 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO2018222622 | Dec 2018 | WO |
WO2018232417 | Dec 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
http://beta.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/derivative (Year: 2015). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Aug. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated May 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Sep. 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Advisory Action dated Sep. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Request for Continued Examination dated Oct. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Office Action dated May 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Aug. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Sep. 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Amendment dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Amendment dated Jun. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,290 Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Nov. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Response dated Sep. 8, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Pre-Appeal Conference Request dated May 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Amendment dated Apr. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Notice of Appeal dated Dec. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Mar. 21, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 9, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Feb. 9, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 15, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Aug. 15, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Appeal dated Jan. 22, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Appeal Brief dated Jun. 20, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Examiners Answer dated Aug. 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Reply Brief dated Oct. 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/992,033 Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,579 Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/993,761 Preliminary amendment dated Nov. 11, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 RCE and amendment dated Dec. 10, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 17, 2020. |
PCT/US2018/034954 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 12, 2018. |
PCT/US2018/038126 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2018. |
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II Demand and Response to Written Opinion dated Mar. 26, 2019. |
PCT/US2018/034954 Second Written Opinion dated Apr. 30, 2019. |
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 3, 2019. |
EP18731331.7 Response and amendment dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
EP18740003.1 Response and amendment dated Oct. 28, 2020. |
Abel, et al., “Preparation and Investigation of Antibacterial Carbohydrate-Based Surfaces”, Carbohydrate Research, vol. 337, No. 24; pp. 2495-2499; Nov. 29, 2002. |
Allison, et al., “Hemocompatibility of Hydrophilic Antimicrobial Copolymers of Alkylated 4-Vinylpyridine” Biomacromolecules; 2007, 8; pp. 2995-2999. |
Borman, “Surfaces Designed to Kill Bacteria”, Chemical & Engineering News; vol. 80, No. 22; pp. 36-38; Jun. 10, 2002. |
Docherty, K., et al., “Toxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquids”, Green Chemistry, vol. 7, pp. 185-189, Mar. 14, 2005, DOI: 10.1039/b419172b. |
Kawabata, et al., “Antibacterial Activity of Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymers”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology; vol. 54, No. 10; pp. 2532-2535; Oct. 1988. |
Krishnan, et al., “Antibacterial Coatings Based on Quaternized Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) Block Copolymers”, Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering; vol. 91; pp. 814-815; 2004. |
Kugler, R., et al., “Evidence of a Charge-Density Threshold for Optimum Efficiency of Biocidal Cationic Surfaces”, Microbiology, 151, 2005, pp. 1341-1348, DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27526-0. |
Li, et al., “Bactericidal Ability of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer Under Different Conditions”; pp. 177-178; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999. |
Li, et al., “Effect of the Macromolecular Chain Structure of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer on Antimicrobial Activity”; pp. 175-176; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999. |
Lin, et al., “Insights Into Bactericidal Action of Surface-Attached Poly(vinyl-N-hexylpyridinium) Chains”, Biotechnology Letters, vol. 24, No. 10; pp. 801-805; May 2002. |
Lin, et al., “Mechanism of Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activities of Textiles Covalently Modified With Alkylated Polyethylenimine”, Biotech. Bioeng.; vol. 83, No. 2; pp. 168-172; Jul. 20, 2003. |
Napper, D.H., “Steric Stabilization”, Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Sydney, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 58, No. 2, Feb. 1977, ISSN 0021-9797, pp. 390-407. |
Sellenet, et al., “Hydrophilized Pyridinium Bactericidal Polymers”, Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Washington, DC; Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2005; pp. 2. |
Sellenet, et al., “Synergistic Activity of Hydrophilic Modification in Antibiotic Polymers” Biomacromolecules; 2007, vol. 8, No. 1; pp. 19-23. |
Sellenet, “Hydrophilized Bactericidal Polymers”, Thesis, Purdue University, MSE, Dec. 2004; pp. 83. |
Tadros, Tharwat F., “Emulsion Formation, Stability, and Rheology”, pp. 1-75, 2013. |
Tiller, et al., “Designing Surfaces That Kill Bacteria on Contact”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; vol. 98, No. 11; pp. 5981-5985; May 22, 2001. |
Tiller, et al., “Polymer Surfaces Derivatized With Poly(Vinyl-N-Hexylpyridinium) Kill Airborne and Waterborne Bacteria”; Biotechnology and Bioengineering;vol. 79, No. 4; pp. 465-471; Aug. 20, 2002. |
Waschinski, C., et al., “poly(oxazoline)s with Telechelic Antimicrobial Functions”, Biomacromolecules 2005, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 235-243. |
Wynne, et al., “Novel Polymer Bound Bactericidal Surfaces”; vol. 45, No. 2; pp. 521-522; Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Philadelphia, PA; Aug. 22-27, 2004. |
Alternative Medicine Review, Undecylenic Acid Monograph, vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, pp. 68-70. |
Selected Abstracts; Dec. 2004-Mar. 2005; pp. 3. |
Surface Industry, Detergent Raw Material, Sodium Tripolyphosphate 94.0% (STPP Industrial Grade), pp. 1-2, XP055579364. |
XP002783622, Database WPI, Week 199349, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, AN 1993-389137, pp. 4. |
Oxford Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th Edition, 2008, pp. 134-135 and 203. |
“Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)”, USDA Technical Evaluation Report, May 26, 2017, pp. 1-21. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210084898 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60711234 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14837900 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15163285 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15163285 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 17115709 | US | |
Parent | 11509915 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 14837900 | US |