The following refers to a method for Software Defined Networking a cyber-physical Network of different technical domains according to the preamble of claim 1, a Software Agent for Software Defined Networking a cyber-physical Network of different technical domains according to the preamble of claim 9, a Networked Device for Software Defined Networking a cyber-physical Network of different technical domains according to the preamble of claim 17, and a SDN-Controller for Software Defined Networking a cyber-physical network of different technical domains according to the preamble of claim 24.
In general and according to the publication “Software-Defined Networking Guide”; World Wide Technology, Inc.; 2014; pages 1 to 20 “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” being promoted by the Open Networking Foundation (ONF) has two characteristics—(i) a Control Plane is separated from a Data Plane implemented on a device and (ii) a single Control Plane manages multiple network devices.
Saying this SDN focuses essentially on SDN-Controllers using a Communication Protocol, such as OpenFlow®, as their “Southbound Interface” to the network devices.
The SDN-Controller is a software program running on at least one server that configure and control a number of network devices. By the expression “Southbound” it is noted an establishment of a communication channel between the SDN-Controller and the network device. In addition to the “Southbound Interface” the SDN-Controller comprises also a “Northbound Interface” which is a user and programmatic interface to direct actions of the SDN-Controller towards request services of the underlying network.
The cited protocol is somehow a communication channel that uses a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) between the network device, such as a switch, router or gateway, and the SDN-Controller to control a forwarding path of the network device from the SDN-Controller. This is achieved and implemented by prescribing numerous matches on headers of data packet and with a list of actions. The actions specify whether the data packet is to be modified, flooded, dropped and output to one or more ports by using flow tables. The flow tables can be used proactively, before the data packets arrive at the network device or reactively, after the data packets have been received by the network device. In the reactive mode the data packets are copied and sent to the SDN-Controller for further analysis and the SDN-Controller sends a flow element to the network device to process the data packet. The SDN-Controllers may be programmed to use a combination of reactive and proactive processing. For this processing the network device includes an agent, which is generally a software program running on the network device to terminate the communications channel from SDN-Controller or an “Application Programming Interface (API)” running in software on a server. In turn, the agent is communicating with an Operating System running on a networked device, called sometimes as a network element.
SDN-specific Communication Protocols, such as OpenFlow®, focus on providing measures to configure forwarding paths and basic flow-based packet matching and filtering. In addition to forwarding configurations, OpenFlow® supports basic network QoS (Quality of Service), e.g. generic traffic prioritization through mechanisms such as “Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP; DiffServ)”-marking, traffic metering and fast rerouting.
The OpenFlow®-Protocol is not only the lonely entity dealing with the SDN-principles. The goal of SDN is to enable a higher degree of control over network devices. This can be achieved by OpenFlow®, but it is not as already said the only tool to achieve or to accomplish this goal.
The cited
According to the depicted cyber-physical Network NW′ the devices NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′ and the Physical Machines PHM1 . . . PHM6 are outside of a subnetwork SNW′ the “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” is applied. This sub-network SNW′ referred to as a SDN-network is shown in the
Within the SDN-network SNW in the context of “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” and again following the preliminary remarks on SDN there are a number of Network Devices NWD′, which with respect to the SDN-implementation are connected to each other by physical channels PHC. According to the illustration in the
With regard to the cyber-physical Network NW′ the six devices NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′ are connected now again via physical channels PHC with the subnetwork or SDN-network SNW′. These connections in the present case are limited to some of the ten Network Devices NWD1′ . . . NWD10′.
Before saying which device goes with which Network Device, the six devices NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′ with respect to the SDN-network SDW′ and following the expression Network Device are noted as Networked Devices, which referring to the “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” of the cyber-physical Network NW′ and in the view of the SDN-Controller SDNC′ are end-nodes, whereas consequently the Network Devices are intermediate nodes.
So a first Networked Device NWDD1′ is connected via the physical channel PHC with a first Network Device NWD1′, a second Networked Device NWDD2′ is connected via the physical channel PHC with a second Network Device NWD2′, a third Networked Device NWDD3′ is connected via the physical channel PHC with a third Network Device NWD3′, a fourth Networked Device NWDD4′ is connected via the physical channel PHC with a fifth Network Device NWD5′, a fifth Networked Device NWDD5′ is connected via the physical channel PHC with a sixth Network Device NWD6′ and a sixth Networked Device NWDD6′ is connected via the physical channel PHC with a tenth Network Device NWD10′.
Embedded in the SDN-network SNW′ on each of the six Networked Devices NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′ could run in principle—although it is depicted only with reference to the first Networked Device NWDD1′—at least one “Real Time”-Virtual Machine RT-VM with at least one “Real Time-Application Software (App)” RT-AS and at least one “Non Real Time”-Virtual Machine NRT-VM with at least one “Non Real Time-Application Software (App)” NRT-AS. However, the App running on the Virtual Machine and thus indirectly on the Networked Device could also run directly on the Networked Device. This is the case for instance for the second Networked Device NWDD2′ to the sixth Networked Device NWDD6′. So on the second Networked Device NWDD2′, the third Networked Device NWDD3′ and the fifth Networked Device NWDD5′ is running directly each at least one “Non Real Time-Application Software (App)” NRT-AS, whereas on the fourth Networked Device NWDD4′ and the sixth Networked Device NWDD6′ is running directly each at least one “Real Time-Application Software (App)” RT-AS.
For hosting the Virtual Machine RT-VM, NRT-VM respectively the App RT-AS, NRT-AS and interfacing the communication to the SDN-network SNW′ via the physical channel PHC each Networked Device NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′—although it is depicted again only with reference to the first Networked Device NWDD1′—includes an Operating System OPS with its system resources, such as a Central Processing Unit CPU and a Memory MEM, and a Communication Interface COI, which is designed exemplarily as a Virtual Network Interface Card VNIC.
Depending on which kind of process, a “Real Time”- and/or a “Non Real Time”-process should be handled, distinct control channels CCRT, CCNRT are set up on the physical channel PHC. So there are established between the first Networked Device NWDD1′ and the first Network Device NWD1′ a “Real Time”-control channel CCRT (dashed line in the
Moreover between the second Networked Device NWDD2′ and the second Network Device NWD2′, between the third Networked Device NWDD3′ and the third Network Device NWD3′ as well as between the fifth Networked Device NWDD5′ and the sixth Network Device NWD6′, because of each hosting the “Non Real Time-Application Software (App)” NRT-AS, the “Non Real Time”-control channel CCNRT (dotted line in the
When the Network Devices in general and the first Network Device NWD1′, the second Network Device NWD2′, the third Network Device NWD3′, the fifth Network Device NWD5′, the sixth Network Device NWD6′ and the tenth Network Device NWD10′ in particular are each nodes of the SDN-network SNW′, the other nodes within the SDN-network SNW′ are connected also by the physical channels PHC and the origin and destination of a connection within the SDN-network SNW′ is a path, then the origin and destination of a connection within the SDN-network with regard to the control channels CCRT, CCNRT are control paths CP. According to the depicture in the
Before going on with aspects and the purpose of the “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” it should be noted, because the
With respect to the purpose of the “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-generally speaking and already implying above—the handling of data packets and routing or controlling decisions within the Network NW are separated such that the data packet handling, in particular data packet forwarding by the intermediate node and data packet transmitting by the end node, is done via data paths and the handling of routing or controlling decisions is done via the control paths CP involving at least one of the Network Components NWC′ and remotely controlled by the SDN-Controller SDNC′ using a Communication Protocol such as the OpenFlow®-Protocol according to which at least one of PUSH/PULL-based commands and PUSH/PULL-based messages are sent and received.
Since the Networked Devices NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′ hosting a number of Virtual Machines and/or App's of the depicted scenario in the
So far most SDN-solutions are focused on controlling the routing/switching infrastructure which is remotely configurable by the SDN-Controller. The Networked Devices, which include each as described above the Operating System with its system resources, respectively network end devices or end-nodes where Virtual Machines, App's or users (or tenant) are hosted are not part of the Network Devices or Network Components as controlled entities controlled by the SDN-Controller.
However many state-of-the-art Operating Systems offer several options to control resource usage by Virtual Machines and/or App's. For example Virtual Machines and/or App's can be prioritized to receive better “Real-Time”-experience, the Memory space can be limited or the access to certain Operating System resources (e.g. graphic card, network) can be granted or denied. There are various interfaces to configure those aspects, depending also on the Operating System. As a result rules, typically Operating System-wide and per-user, exist.
Industrial grade SDN-networks of the cyber-physical Network have to deliver separate configurable network paths dimensioned and selected along multiple criteria for each tenant. This does not only require a path definition in the networking intermediate devices but also provide guarantees which span “End-to-End” from servers to IO-devices and IO-controllers.
A modified SDN-Controller for this purpose has to deliver industrial grade communication services “End-to-End” by guaranteeing network resources allocated “End-to-End” thereby involving the network end devices or end-nodes. The heterogeneity of the computing platforms and their different used run-time have to be add to the variety of control methods that an SDN controller has to configure. The assumption made in previous SDN-approaches that it is possible to define a single interface to a new standardized type of platform does not hold in the case of end nodes.
A new SDN-approach is also used to enforce limitations or control resource usage, e.g. a data stream cannot go beyond a certain bandwidth unless granted by the SDN-system comprising the SDN-Controller and the SDN-network.
The type of SDN-enforcement in end-nodes could also include methods that go beyond the configuration or enforcement of SLA for a network interface (e.g. queues, network shapers etc.). There are also other possibilities to enforce resource separation for different applications within the same host by controlling the resource allocated to a virtual machine (sandboxing), virtual network device (e.g. switch, network interfaces, etc). All the above methods are not covered by existing SDN-specific Communication Protocols such as OpenFlow®.
An aspect relates to a Method, Software Agent, Networked Device and SDN-Controller for Software Defined Networking a cyber-physical network of different technical domains, in particular an industry automation network, which extends the “Software Defined Networking” of the cyber-physical respectively the industry automation network such that the quality of networking is improved up to industrial grade and which resolves the bunch of problems discussed above.
The underlying idea of the embodiments of the invention to merge the usage control of Operating System resources—e.g. the prioritization to receive better “Real-Time”-experience, the limitation of Memory space, the grant or denial of access to certain Operating System resources, etc.—by App's and/or Virtual Machines running on/hosted by a Networked Device including an Operating System in a cyber-physical Network with the controlling a modified SDN-System extending a conventional SDN-System to an “End-to-End”-Communication within the cyber-physical Network provides on a per-application-basis and to control all this from a SDN-Controller being adapted to these circumstances and requirements. Thus against the background of the embodiments of the invention it can be spoken of an adapted SDN-Controller.
This merging is implemented by a Software Agent as additional logic and configuration elements assigned to the Operating System in the Networked Device managing the properties of the Networked Device and the App's and/or Virtual Machines running on/hosted by the Networked Device, which allows the introduction of flexible data models and which in addition to all the features provided by a forwarding rules management protocol enables remote access management concerning the App's and/or Virtual Machines, containers instantiation, configuration of cyber-physical network-related appliances, etc.
The Software Agent is running in all Networked Devices and Network Devices respectively Network Components of the cyber-physical Network. The prerequisites on the cited Networked Devices being controllable by the adapted SDN-Controller over an “End-to-End”-Communication within the cyber-physical Network between the Networked Device and the adapted SDN-Controller is that they offer the possibility of being connected to the cyber-physical Network through the Communication Interface, in particular through the Network Interface Card (NIC), they have an Operating System which can support many of the networking stack protocols including some type of QoS-control, and include appropriate means to control resource usage of the App's and/or Virtual Machines.
The Software Agent encapsulates the methods to access any of these implementations within each Networked Device/Network Device respectively Network Component into a modular function list. By allowing the introduction of a specified flexible data model, the Software Agent will expose a management interface for remote modification of any configurable SDN-System parameters. The Software Agent's integrity can be ensured by means of process isolation mechanisms.
The Software Agent provides a single interface per Networked Device/Network Device respectively Network Component that allows a control channel to exist between the Networked Device/Network Device respectively Network Component and the adapted SDN-Controller.
The received commands and messages sent by the Software Agent to and from the adapted SDN-Controller are generic commands, which are technology independent and implementation independent. The modular function model of the Software Agent implementation has two roles
a) Offering and allowing remote control of the different Networked Device/Network Device respectively Network Component capabilities to the SDN-Controller through the generic and implementation independent control channel and Communication Protocol;
b) Encapsulating the Software Agent's modular functions and their different technological implementations by allowing bi-directional translation between the generic SDN-Controller messages and the internal implementation of the technology.
The necessity for such a Software Agent is, because
(i) Conventional SDN-specific configuration protocols, such as the OpenFlow®, focus on providing measures to configure forwarding paths and basic flow-based packet matching and filtering. In addition to forwarding configurations, the OpenFlow® supports the basic network QoS (Quality of Service), e.g. generic traffic prioritization through mechanisms such as the “Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP; DiffServ)”-marking, the traffic metering and the fast rerouting.
(ii) the OpenFlow®-standard does not define the elements to configure and monitor other SDN-System aspects of the Network Components respectively the Network Devices, such as virtual interface configurations, forwarding table sizes, administrative access policies and similar. The use cases of managing individual devices and system resources which go beyond the configuration of basic forwarding rules and associated QoS are out of scope in the OpenFlow®.
The tasks of the Software Agent according to the embodiments of the invention are:
1) The extent of control carried out on the Networked Device hosting a Virtual Machine-logic and/or App-logic.
2) The resource management of any type that can be assigned to the Virtual Machine and/or App both network-related and also computational or with reference to the Memory.
3) The consideration in the industry automation network environment of all automation application requirements in terms of resource isolation and resource sharing methods to include all possible controllable resources on an “App/Virtual Machine-hosting-industrial-Networked Device”. The focus is also on industrial App/Virtual Machine requirements and the way they could run on multi-purpose computing Networked Devices, which host other non-industrial App's/Virtual Machines at the same time.
Such a complex Networked Device is a more advanced computing platform than a conventional legacy Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) which is rather offering features than it is allocating “Real-Time”-Application exclusive access and guarantees from computing power to network access. The type of Operating System that can offer such guarantee is not in focus here, even if a Linux OS with some “Real-Time”-extensions has the possibility to offer different levels of virtualization and some “Real-Time”-Network Access today. The role of the Software Agent is also to make sure that the guarantee is unbroken (from App/Virtual Machine “Real-Time”-access to the computing resources to the way this App/Virtual Machine-related traffic is treated by the SDN-network stack).
The Software Agent also offers the possibility to upload “network-related App's” that also run as generic functions or simply act in the Networked Device as an application process such as “Firewall function”, DNS Server function, etc.
The industrial-grade services controlled by the adapted SDN-Controller include:
SDN-Network Supporting Functions at the Networked Devices:
Acting on Real and Virtual Computing Resources:
The Software Agent also fulfills the following functions:
By using, deploying, implementing the Software Agent the following benefits are associated:
Moreover advantageous further developments of the embodiments of the invention arise out of the following description of a preferred embodiment of the invention according to the
The cited
According to the depicted modified cyber-physical Network NW the modified devices NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 and the Physical Machines PHM1 . . . PHM6 are now contrary to the
Within the SDN-network SNW in the context of “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” and again following the preliminary remarks on SDN there are again and in addition a number of modified Network Devices NWD, which with respect to the SDN-implementation are connected to each other by physical channels PHC. According to the illustration in the
Therefore the six devices NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 are connected within the subnetwork or SDN-network SNW again via physical channels PHC with some of the ten Network Devices NWD1 . . . NWD10. The six devices NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 with respect to the SDN-network SDN and following the expression Network Device are noted again as Networked Devices, which referring to the “Software Defined Networking (SDN)” of the cyber-physical Network NW and in the view of the SDN-Controller SDNC are end-nodes, whereas consequently the Network Devices are intermediate nodes.
So again a first modified Networked Device NWDD1 is connected via the physical channel PHC with a first modified Network Device NWD1, a second modified Networked Device NWDD2 is connected via the physical channel PHC with a second modified Network Device NWD2, a third modified Networked Device NWDD3 is connected via the physical channel PHC with a third modified Network Device NWD3, a fourth modified Networked Device NWDD4 is connected via the physical channel PHC with a fifth modified Network Device NWD5, a fifth modified Networked Device NWDD5 is connected via the physical channel PHC with a sixth modified Network Device NWD6 and a sixth modified Networked Device NWDD6 is connected via the physical channel PHC with a tenth modified Network Device NWD10.
Embedded in the modified SDN-network SNW on each of the six modified Networked Devices NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 could run again in principle—although it is depicted only with reference to the first Networked Device NWDD1—at least one of the “Real Time”-Virtual Machine RT-VM with at least one of the “Real Time-Application Software (App)” RT-AS and at least one of the “Non Real Time”-Virtual Machine NRT-VM with at least one of the “Non Real Time-Application Software (App)” NRT-AS. However, the App running on the Virtual Machine and thus indirectly on the Networked Device again could also run directly on the Networked Device. This for instance is the case for the second modified Networked Device NWDD2 to the sixth modified Networked Device NWDD6. So on the second modified Networked Device NWDD2, the third modified Networked Device NWDD3 and the fifth modified Networked Device NWDD5 is running directly each at least one of the “Non Real Time-Application Software (App)” NRT-AS, whereas on the fourth modified Networked Device NWDD4 and the sixth modified Networked Device NWDD6 is running directly each at least one of the “Real Time-Application Software (App)” RT-AS.
For hosting the Virtual Machine RT-VM, NRT-VM respectively the App RT-AS, NRT-AS and interfacing the communication to the SDN-network SNW via the physical channel PHC each modified Networked Device NWDD1 . . . NWDD6—although it is depicted again only with reference to the first Networked Device NWDD1—includes again the Operating System OPS with its system resources, such as the Central Processing Unit CPU and the Memory MEM, and the Communication Interface COI, which is designed again exemplarily as the Virtual Network Interface Card VNIC.
Moreover each modified Networked Device NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 and its Operating system OPS comprises contrary to the Networked Device NWDD1′ . . . NWDD6′ in the
Again depending on which kind of process, the “Real Time”- and/or the “Non Real Time”-process should be handled, distinct control channels CCRT, CCNRT are set up on the physical channel PHC. So again between the first modified Networked Device NWDD1 and the first modified Network Device NWD1 there are established the “Real Time”-control channel CCRT (dashed line in the
When the Network Devices and the Networked Devices in general and the first Network Device NWD1, the second Network Device NWD2, the third Network Device NWD3, the fifth Network Device NWD5, the sixth Network Device NWD6 and the tenth Network Device NWD10 as well as the Networked Devices NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 in particular are each nodes of the modified SDN-network SNW, the other nodes within the SDN-network are connected also by the physical channels PHC and the origin and destination of a connection within the SDN-network SNW is again the path, then again the origin and destination of a connection within the modified SDN-network with regard to the control channels CCRT, CCNRT are the control paths CP. According to the depicture in the
Again it should be noted, because the
Again with respect to the purpose of the “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”—generally speaking and already implying—the handling of data packets and routing or controlling decisions within the modified Network NW are separated such that the data packet handling, in particular data packet forwarding by the intermediate node and data packet transmitting by the end node, is done via data paths and the handling of routing or controlling decisions is done via the control paths CP involving at least one of the modified Network Components NWC and remotely controlled by the modified SDN-Controller SDNC using a modified Communication Protocol according to which at least one of PUSH/PULL-based commands and PUSH/PULL-based messages are sent and received.
Now since the modified Networked Devices NWDD1 . . . NWDD6 hosting a number of Virtual Machines and/or App's of the depicted scenario in the
The system components of the modified SDN-System include according to the depicture in the
In a first step the single system components and its structural set-up in the order mentioned above and in a second step the cooperation of system components will be described, whereby all cited system components have for the communication into the Network NW/SDN-network SNW a common technical link TLNW/SNW.
Besides this technical link, the modified SDN-Controller SDNC includes a Processor PRC, to which are assigned a Path Finder Program Module PFPM, a Calculating/Scheduling Program Module CSPM, a Synchronization Program Module SYPM and a Remote Access and Configuration Program Module RACPM and a non-transitory processor readable Storage Device STD having processor-readable program-instructions stored therein. The processor-readable program-instructions are executable by the Processor PRC to handle data packets and to route or control decisions within the Network NW by involving the Path Finder Program Module PFPM, the Calculating/Scheduling Program Module CSPM, the Synchronization Program Module SYPM and the Remote Access and Configuration Program Module RACPM.
Furthermore, the modified Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1, which is preferably designed as a Computer, a Server, a Server farm, a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), etc., includes besides the cited technical link the Operating System OPS with various system resources. These include inter alia the Central Processing Unit CPU, the Memory MEM connected with Central Processing Unit CPU, a Scheduler SCD assigned to the Memory MEM, the Central Processing Unit CPU and the technical link TLNW/SNW, a “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP assigned to the Scheduler SCD and a clock CLK assigned to Scheduler SCD and the “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP.
Moreover the modified Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1 include
1) the Communication Interface COI, which comprises a number of the Virtual Network Interface Cards VNIC being oriented towards the number of Virtual Machines and/or App's the Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1 is hosting and which serves as linkage between the Operating system OPS and the technical link TLNW/SNW,
2) a Hypervisor/Virtualization Entity HVE, which is administrating the number of Virtual Machines hosted by the Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1 and which serves as linkage between the Operating System OPS and these Virtual Machines and finally
3) a Software Agent SWA, which as the central control entity particularly with regard to the “Software Defined Networking” in the modified “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-System SDNS is assigned to the Scheduler SCD, the “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP, the Operating System OPS and the Hypervisor/Virtualization Entity HVE.
To 2): The number of Virtual Machines and whether at least one App is running the Virtual Machines hosted in total by the Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1 is in principle arbitrary. However, in the present case there are one “Real Time”-Virtual Machine RT-VM on which is running one “Real Time-Application Software (App)” RT-AS and “n” Virtual Machines VM1 . . . VMn on which are running “n” “Application's Software (App's)” AS1 . . . ASn. This means that the cited Application's Software (App's)” RT-AS, AS1 . . . ASn are running indirectly on the Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1.
To 3): In his function as the central control entity particularly with regard to the “Software Defined Networking” in the modified “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-System SDNS the Software Agent SWA includes
a) at least one Sensor SE perceiving an operating environment of the Software Agent SWA defined by the Networked Device NWDD within the Network respectively the SDN-network and regarding the SDN-purpose of the modified “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-System SDNS,
b) at least one Actor AC interacting in that environment and
c) Determining Means DM for determining how the Software Agent SWA is going to interact with the environment.
These cited SWA-elements are designed such and forming a Functional Unit FTU referring to as an “agent function”.
The
Additionally, the modified Networked Device with the second technical emphasis NWDDTE2, which is also preferably designed as a Computer, a Server, a Server farm, a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), etc., includes the same components, entities and elements as the modified Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1. For this reason it should be noted the difference to the modified Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1.
The only differences are that on the “n” Virtual Machines VM1 . . . VMn are running no “Application's Software (App's)” and instead of this the “Application's Software (App's)” AS1 . . . ASn and the “Real Time-Application Software (App)” RT-AS are running directly on the Networked Device with the second technical emphasis NWDDTE2.
Finally, the modified Network Device NWD, which is preferably designed as a Physical Switch, a Physical Router or a Physical Gateway include
A) a Forwarding Queue Assignment Entity FQAE including by assignment some Queuing-Elements QE serving as linkage between the Forwarding Queue Assignment Entity FQAE and a number of the Network Interface Cards NIC belonging to the Communication Interface COI,
B) the Scheduler SCD assigned to the Forwarding Queue Assignment Entity FQAE and the technical link TLNW/SNW,
C) the “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP assigned to the Scheduler SCD and
D) the clock CLK assigned to Scheduler SCD and the “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP.
It should be noted and reminded that the modified Network Device NWD could be realized as the Network Component, which again is one Virtual Machine of the at least one Virtual Machine VM1 . . . VMn, such as a Virtual Switch, a Virtual Router or a Virtual Gateway, hosted by the modified Networked Device NWDD, NWDDTE1, NWDDTE2. In this case the Network Component is part of the modified Networked Device and has not structural elements of the modified Network Device NWD.
Moreover the modified Networked Device with the first technical emphasis NWDDTE1 include the Software Agent SWA with the same structural elements as cited above [cf section “To 3):” ], which as the central control entity particularly with regard to the “Software Defined Networking” in the modified “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-System SDNS is assigned to the Scheduler SCD, the “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP and the Forwarding Queue Assignment Entity FQAE.
The cooperation of the above-described system components of the modified “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-System SDNS is based on the control channels CC via which the Communication Protocol COP is processed such that by interaction between the Functional Units FTU being formed by the Sensor SE, the Actor AC the Determining Means DM in the Software Agents SWA in the modified Networked Device NWDD, NWDDTE1, NWDDTE2 and the modified Network Device NWD and the Processor PRC of the modified SDN-Controller SDNC involving the Path Finder Program Module PFPM, the Calculating/Scheduling Program Module CSPM, the Synchronization Program Module SYPM and the Remote Access and Configuration Program Module RACPM
I) a service list being embedded in the Communication Protocol COP and encapsulating modeled data of a flexible data model, which is involved into the Operating System OPS of the Networked Device NWDD, by translating bi-directionally between the command and the message of the Communication Protocol COP and the modeled data in order to enable
To address and achieve also within the cooperation of the above-described system components of the modified “Software Defined Networking (SDN)”-System SDNS “Real-Time-Capability”, which is realized “End-to-End” between the Networked Device NWDD and the SDN-Controller SDNC with respect to the controlling of the at least one Physical Machine of the technical domain, according to an
a) Option “A” the Software Agent SWA is acting with the Scheduler SCD being assigned to the Central Processing Unit CPU and the Memory MEM and thereby using the “End-to-End”-Synchronization Protocol E2E-SP being assigned to the Scheduler SCD to schedule accesses to the Central Processing Unit CPU and the Memory MEM and to guarantee the scheduled accesses to the Central Processing Unit CPU and the Memory MEM.
b) Option “B” the Software Agent SWA is acting within the Operating System OPS with a “Real-Time”-Core RTC of the Central Processing Unit CPU to allocate a share of the Central Processing Unit CPU and the Memory MEM and to guarantee the allocated share of the Central Processing Unit CPU and the Memory MEM.
Although the invention has been illustrated and described in greater detail with reference to the preferred exemplary embodiment, the invention is not limited to the examples disclosed, and further variations can be inferred by a person skilled in the art, without departing from the scope of protection of the invention.
For the sake of clarity, it is to be understood that the use of “a” or “an” throughout this application does not exclude a plurality, and “comprising” does not exclude other steps or elements.
This application claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/EP2016/068881, having a filing date of Aug. 8, 2016, the entire contents both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/068881 | 8/8/2016 | WO | 00 |