Environments in which objects are managed, such as retail facilities, warehousing and distribution facilities, and the like, may store such objects in regions such as aisles of shelf modules or the like. For example, a retail facility may include objects such as products for purchase, and a distribution facility may include objects such as parcels or pallets. A mobile automation apparatus may be deployed within such facilities to perform tasks at various locations. For example, a mobile automation apparatus may be deployed to capture data representing an aisle and corresponding products in a retail facility. However, the variability of the products in the facility, as well as variations in data capture conditions (e.g. lighting and the like) can prevent the accurate detection of individual products and their status from such data.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
Examples disclosed herein are directed to a method by an imaging controller of detecting item facings from image sensor data includes: obtaining, at the imaging controller, the image sensor data corresponding to a support structure containing at least one item; identifying, by a feature detector of the imaging controller, a set of matched keypoint pairs from keypoints of the image sensor data; determining, by a peak detector of the imaging controller, a separation distance between the keypoints of each matched keypoint pair; detecting, by the peak detector, a count of item instances represented in the image sensor data based on the separation distances; and presenting item facing detection output including the count of item instances.
Additional examples disclosed herein are directed to a computing device, comprising: a feature detector configured to: obtain image sensor data corresponding to a support structure containing at least one item; and identify a set of matched keypoint pairs from keypoints of the image sensor data; a peak detector configured to: determine a separation distance between the keypoints of each matched keypoint pair; detect a count of item instances represented in the image sensor data based on the separation distances; and a boundary generator configured to present item facing detection output including the count of item instances.
Further examples disclosed herein are directed to a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by an imaging controller to configure the imaging controller to: obtain image sensor data corresponding to a support structure containing at least one item; identify a set of matched keypoint pairs from keypoints of the image sensor data; determine a separation distance between the keypoints of each matched keypoint pair; detect a count of item instances represented in the image sensor data based on the separation distances; and present item facing detection output including the count of item instances.
The client computing device 104 is illustrated in
The system 100 is deployed, in the illustrated example, in a retail facility including a plurality of support structures such as shelf modules 110-1, 110-2, 110-3 and so on (collectively referred to as shelf modules 110 or shelves 110, and generically referred to as a shelf module 110 or shelf 110—this nomenclature is also employed for other elements discussed herein). The support structures can have various other forms in some examples, including tables, peg boards and the like. Each shelf module 110 supports a plurality of items such as products 112. Each shelf module 110 includes a shelf back 116-1, 116-2, 116-3 and a support surface (e.g. support surface 117-3 as illustrated in
The shelf modules 110 (also referred to as sub-regions of the facility) are typically arranged in a plurality of aisles (also referred to as regions of the facility), each of which includes a plurality of modules 110 aligned end-to-end. In such arrangements, the shelf edges 118 face into the aisles, through which customers in the retail facility, as well as the apparatus 103, may travel. As will be apparent from
The apparatus 103 is equipped with a plurality of navigation and data capture sensors 108, such as image sensors (e.g. one or more digital cameras) and depth sensors (e.g. one or more Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, one or more depth cameras employing structured light patterns, such as infrared light, or the like). The apparatus 103 is deployed within the retail facility and, via communication with the server 101 and use of the sensors 108, navigates autonomously or partially autonomously along a length 119 of at least a portion of the shelves 110.
While navigating among the shelves 110, the apparatus 103 can capture images (also referred to as image sensor data), depth measurements and the like, representing the shelves 110 (generally referred to as shelf data or captured data). Navigation may be performed according to a frame of reference 102 established within the retail facility. The apparatus 103 therefore tracks its pose (i.e. location and orientation) in the frame of reference 102.
The server 101 includes a special purpose controller, such as a processor 120, specifically designed to control and/or assist the mobile automation apparatus 103 to navigate the environment and to capture data. The processor 120 is also specifically designed, as will be discussed in detail herein, to process image data and/or depth measurements captured by the apparatus 103 representing the shelf modules 110, in order to detect product facings on the shelf modules 110. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, a product facing is a single instance of a product facing into the aisle. Thus, if a support surface 117 carries three identical products adjacent to one another, the products represent three distinct facings. The resulting detected product facings can be provided to product status detection mechanisms (which may also be implemented by the processor 120 itself).
The processor 120 is interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a memory 122. The memory 122 includes a combination of volatile memory (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory). The processor 120 and the memory 122 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. In some embodiments, the processor 120 is implemented as one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs).
The memory 122 stores computer readable instructions for performing various actions, including control of the apparatus 103 to navigate the shelf modules 110 and capture shelf data, as well as post-processing of the shelf data. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the processor 120 configures the server 101 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 122 include an item facing detection application 124 (also simply referred to as the application 124). In general, via execution of the application 124 or subcomponents thereof and in conjunction with other components of the server 101, the processor 120 performs various actions to detect, in image data and depth measurements representing the shelves 110 (e.g. data captured by the apparatus 103), individual product facings, for use in downstream processing to detect product status information (e.g. whether products are out of stock, misplaced or the like).
Certain example components of the application 124 are shown in
In other embodiments, the application 124 may be implemented as a suite of logically distinct application, each implementing a suitable portion of the functionality discussed below. For example, the detectors 126 and 128, as well as the boundary generator 130, may be implemented as separate applications.
The memory 122 can also store data for use in the above-mentioned control of the apparatus 103, such as a repository 132 containing a map of the retail environment and any other suitable data (e.g. operational constraints for use in controlling the apparatus 103, data captured by the apparatus 103, and the like).
The processor 120, as configured via the execution of the application 124, is also referred to herein as an imaging controller 120, or simply as a controller 120. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the imaging controller 120 described below may also be performed by preconfigured special purpose hardware controllers (e.g. one or more logic circuit arrangements specifically configured to optimize the speed of image processing, for example via FPGAs and/or Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) configured for this purpose) rather than by execution of the application 124 by the processor 120.
The server 101 also includes a communications interface 134 interconnected with the processor 120. The communications interface 134 includes suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the server 101 to communicate with other computing devices—particularly the apparatus 103, the client device 104 and the dock 106—via the links 105 and 107. The links 105 and 107 may be direct links, or links that traverse one or more networks, including both local and wide-area networks. The specific components of the communications interface 134 are selected based on the type of network or other links that the server 101 is required to communicate over. In the present example, as noted earlier, a wireless local-area network is implemented within the retail facility via the deployment of one or more wireless access points. The links 105 therefore include either or both wireless links between the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 104 and the above-mentioned access points, and a wired link (e.g. an Ethernet-based link) between the server 101 and the access point.
The processor 120 can therefore obtain data captured by the apparatus 103 via the communications interface 134 for storage (e.g. in the repository 132) and subsequent processing, e.g. via execution of the application 124 to detect product facings, as noted above). The server 101 may also transmit status notifications (e.g. notifications indicating that products are out-of-stock, in low stock or misplaced) to the client device 104 responsive to the determination of product status data. The client device 104 includes one or more controllers (e.g. central processing units (CPUs) and/or field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and the like) configured to process (e.g. to display) notifications received from the server 101.
Turning now to
The mast 205 also supports at least one depth sensor 209, such as a 3D digital camera capable of capturing both depth data and image data. The apparatus 103 also includes additional depth sensors, such as LIDAR sensors 211. In the present example, the mast 205 supports two LIDAR sensors 211-1 and 211-2. In other examples, the mast 205 can support additional LIDAR sensors 211 (e.g. four LIDARs 211). As shown in
The mast 205 also supports a plurality of illumination assemblies 213, configured to illuminate the fields of view of the respective cameras 207. That is, the illumination assembly 213-1 illuminates the field of view of the camera 207-1, and so on. The cameras 207 and LIDARs 211 are oriented on the mast 205 such that the fields of view of the sensors each face a shelf 110 along the length 119 of which the apparatus 103 is traveling. As noted earlier, the apparatus 103 is configured to track a pose of the apparatus 103 (e.g. a location and orientation of the center of the chassis 201) in the frame of reference 102, permitting data captured by the apparatus 103 to be registered to the frame of reference 102 for subsequent processing.
Referring to
The memory 304 stores computer readable instructions for execution by the processor 300. In particular, the memory 304 stores an apparatus control application 308 which, when executed by the processor 300, configures the processor 300 to perform various functions related to navigating the facility and controlling the sensors 108 to capture data, e.g. responsive to instructions from the server 101. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the functionality implemented by the processor 300 via the execution of the application 308 may also be implemented by one or more specially designed hardware and firmware components, such as FPGAs, ASICs and the like in other embodiments.
The memory 304 may also store a repository 312 containing, for example, a map of the environment in which the apparatus 103 operates, for use during the execution of the application 308. The apparatus 103 also includes a communications interface 316 enabling the apparatus 103 to communicate with the server 101 (e.g. via the link 105 or via the dock 106 and the link 107), for example to receive instructions to navigate to specified locations and initiate data capture operations.
The actions performed by the server 101, and specifically by the processor 120 as configured via execution of the application 124, to detect product facings from captured data representing the shelves 110 (e.g. images and depth measurements captured by the apparatus 103) will now be discussed in greater detail with reference to
At block 405, the server 101, and particularly the feature detector 126, obtains at least an image corresponding to an area of a shelf 110 that contains at least one product 112. In particular, the area in the examples discussed below can contain as few as one product 112 of a given type, or multiple contiguous products 112 of that type. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, products 112 that are arranged contiguously (i.e. immediately adjacent to one another on the shelf module 110, including being in physical contact with one another) may be difficult to segment by processing image and/or depth data according to other techniques such as edge detection.
The area mentioned above may also be referred to as a facing block, in that the image represents a block of at least one instance of a product 112, up to an unknown number of instances of the product 112. The server 101 may also obtain, at block 405, a set of depth measurements corresponding to the facing block. The depth measurements can be, for example, a plurality of sets of coordinates in the frame of reference 102. The image and depth data noted above may have been previously acquired by the apparatus 103 and provided to the server 101 for further processing.
The image data and depth data obtained at block 405 can be obtained in various ways. For example, turning to
From the input data set out above, at block 405 the server can extract an image of a particular facing block for further processing. For example, an image 512 corresponding to the facing block 508a (i.e. the ROI indicator 508a) is shown separately from the image 504. The process described below can later be repeated for the other facing block areas 508. In other examples, the above processing to extract the relevant image and depth data can be performed previously, or by another computing device, such that at block 405 the server 101 simply retrieves the image 512, e.g. from the repository 132.
Returning to
Turning to
Referring again to
At block 415, the feature detector 126 is configured to identify pairs of feature descriptors that are equal or sufficiently similar, and store (e.g. in the memory 122 the pairs for further processing. Various search mechanisms can be employed to identify matched pairs of keypoints 604. For example, the feature detector 126 can select each feature descriptor 608 in turn and generate a difference metric between the selected feature descriptor 608 and every other feature descriptor 608. An example of a difference metric that may be employed with ORB feature descriptors is the Hamming distance.
In the example illustrated in
Various optimizations can be applied to the performance of block 415. For example, rather than performing the above-mentioned brute force search, the server 101 may generate a k-d tree containing the feature descriptors 608 and perform searches for matching feature descriptors 608 using the k-d tree.
In addition, referring to
The performance of block 415, therefore, results in a number of matched keypoint pairs. In the example shown in
At block 420, the server 101 is configured to determine distances between the matched keypoint pairs from block 415, and to detect a number of product instances in the image from block 405 based on those distances. The distances determined at block 420 can be physical distances, for example based on the depth measurements obtained at block 405. That is, the peak detector 128 of the server 101 can be configured to register (e.g. via back-projection) each of the keypoints 604 to the depth measurements in the point cloud 500, to determine a three-dimensional location of each keypoint 604 according to the frame of reference 604. In the present example, the distances determined at block 420 are horizontal distances (e.g. distances along the X axis of the frame of reference 102 as shown in
Referring to
The process shown in
The number of product instances detected at block 420 is the number of peaks detected, increased by one. As will now be apparent, each peak indicates a recurring distance between matched keypoint pairs. That is, each peak indicates the presence of multiple matched keypoint pairs with similar spacing. For example, the matched keypoint pairs [604-1, 604-3] and [604-7, 604-8], as seen in
The peak detector 128 can also apply a minimum threshold to peak detection, such that a local maximum is only identified as a peak if the score exceeds the threshold. In the event that the image data from block 405 depicts a single product instance, the feature detector 126 may detect few or no matched keypoint pairs, and the histogram generated at block 420 may therefore include scores that only represent a small proportion of the total number of identified keypoints. Under such conditions, local maxima in the histogram may still exist due to features matched within the same product instance, but such local maxima are likely to be smaller (i.e. have lower scores) than peaks resulting from repeated product instances. By applying a magnitude threshold to the peaks identified at block 420, the peak detector 128 may avoid detecting peaks that result from matches within a product instance rather than peaks that are indicative of distinct products instances.
Referring again to
Allocation of keypoints 604 to clusters may be performed by the boundary generator 130 according to a suitable clustering mechanism, such as k-means clustering or the like. The count of product instances (three, in the present example performance of the method 400) detected at block 420 is provided to the clustering mechanism as an input. That is, the boundary generator 130 is configured to allocate the keypoints 604 to a specific number of clusters, given by the result of block 420.
In some examples, the allocation of keypoints 604 to clusters is based not only on the count of product instances detected at block 420, but also on the distances determined at block 420 and the results of block 415 (indicating which keypoints 604 are paired). In the present example, clustering of the keypoints 604 is performed at block 425 by implementing a spectral clustering algorithm, such as that described in Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. & Weiss, Y. (2001). On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an Algorithm. Proceedings Adv. Neural Inf. Process Syst. 14. The spectral clustering mechanism accepts as inputs an expected number of clusters (i.e. the detected count of product instances from block 420), and an affinity matrix. The affinity matrix indicates a degree of similarity between each pair of keypoints 604 (not only the matched keypoint pairs mentioned above). That is, an affinity value may be assigned to each pair of keypoints, such as a value between zero and one.
In general, a pair of keypoints 604 with a greater affinity value (e.g. closer to one) are more likely to be placed in the same cluster, while a pair of keypoints with a smaller affinity value (e.g. closer to zero) are more likely to be placed in different clusters. When the boundary generator 130 implements spectral clustering at block 425, the affinity matrix can be initialized based on the results of blocks 415 and 420.
In particular, referring to
At block 910, the server 101 determines whether the selected pair of keypoints 604 is a matched pair, according to the results of block 415. For example, the determination at block 910 is affirmative for the keypoints 604-1 and 604-3. The server 101 therefore proceeds to block 915, at which the affinity value corresponding to the selected pair is set to zero. In other words, if the selected pair of keypoints 604 is a matched pair, the matched pair is assumed to depict two instances of the same product feature. Therefore, each member of the matched pair is associated with a different product instance, and is to be placed in a different cluster. Setting the affinity measurement to zero increases the likelihood that the keypoints 604 will be assigned to distinct clusters.
When the determination at block 910 is negative, as in the example of the keypoints 604-2 and 604-7, the server 101 proceeds to block 920 rather than block 915. At block 920, an affinity value is set for the selected pair of keypoints 604 based on the distance separating the selected keypoints 604. Specifically, the affinity value set at block 920 is inversely proportional to the distance separating the selected pair of keypoints 604, reflecting an assumption that keypoints 604 that are more distant from one another are more likely to correspond to distinct product instances.
At block 430, the server 101 can be configured to generate item boundaries corresponding to detected product instances, based on the results of block 430. In particular, the boundary generator 130 can be configured to fit a boundary (e.g. a rectangular boundary, although other shapes of boundary may also be generated in other examples. Various boundary fitting mechanisms (e.g. RANSAC-based fitting, Minimum Volume Bounding Box, or the like) can be implemented by the boundary generator 130 at block 430 to generate the boundaries, for example as three-dimensional bounding boxes defined according to the frame of reference 102.
Referring again to
At block 435, the server 101 is configured to present item facing detection output, e.g. via a display connected to the server 101, and/or by transmitting output to the client device 104, and/or by providing the output to another component of the server 101 itself for further processing, or the like. The item facing detection output can include at least one of the count of item instances detected at block 420 and the boundaries generated at block 430. The item facing detection output can also be stored, e.g. in the memory 122.
Variations to the functionality described above are contemplated. For example, the server 101 can be configured to detect vertically stacked products 112 as well as horizontally arranged products 112 such as those shown in the image 512. In particular, as shown with a dashed line in
The performance of block 415 in such examples may be constrained to match keypoints separated by a minimum distance in the dimension currently being processed in the image sensor data. In addition, processing for the second physical dimension may include multiple performances of blocks 415-430, once for each cluster identified at block 430 for the first physical dimension. For example, a first performance of blocks 415-430 may segment the image sensor data into three horizontally-arranged clusters. Blocks 415-430 are then repeated three times, restricting each performance to the image sensor data within a respective horizontal cluster. In other examples, the above-mentioned order of processed dimensions can be reversed.
Turning to
Additionally, a second iteration of block 420 yields a histogram 1116, in which a first peak 1120 results from matching keypoint pairs for horizontally-spaced items (which therefore have small vertical separation distances). The peak 1120, as with the peak 1112, may be ignored. In addition, the histogram 1116 presents two peaks 1124 and 1128. To generate a total count of item instances, the server 101 may multiply a detected horizontal count (two) by a detected vertical count (three).
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5209712 | Ferri | May 1993 | A |
5214615 | Bauer | May 1993 | A |
5408322 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414268 | McGee | May 1995 | A |
5534762 | Kim | Jul 1996 | A |
5566280 | Fukui et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5704049 | Briechle | Dec 1997 | A |
5953055 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026376 | Kenney | Feb 2000 | A |
6034379 | Bunte et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075905 | Herman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141293 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6304855 | Burke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6442507 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6549825 | Kurata | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6580441 | Schileru-Key | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6711293 | Lowe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721723 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721769 | Rappaport et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6836567 | Silver et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7090135 | Patel | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137207 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7245558 | Willins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248754 | Cato | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7373722 | Cooper et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7474389 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487595 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493336 | Noonan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508794 | Feather et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7605817 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647752 | Magnell | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693757 | Zimmerman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751928 | Antony et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7783383 | Eliuk et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7839531 | Sugiyama | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845560 | Emanuel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885865 | Benson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7925114 | Mai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7957998 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7996179 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009864 | Linaker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8049621 | Egan | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8091782 | Cato et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094902 | Crandall et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094937 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8189855 | Opalach et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199977 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207964 | Meadow et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8233055 | Matsunaga et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8260742 | Cognigni et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265895 | Willins et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277396 | Scott et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284988 | Sones et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8423431 | Rouaix et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429004 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479996 | Barkan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520067 | Ersue | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542252 | Perez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8571314 | Tao et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8599303 | Stettner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630924 | Groenevelt et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660338 | Ma et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8743176 | Stettner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757479 | Clark et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812226 | Zeng | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923893 | Austin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939369 | Olmstead et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954188 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958911 | Wong et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971637 | Rivard | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8989342 | Liesenfelt et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007601 | Steffey et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015072 | Wu | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9037287 | Grauberger et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9064394 | Trundle | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9070285 | Ramu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9072929 | Rush et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9120622 | Elazary et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9129277 | Macintosh | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135491 | Morandi et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9159047 | Winkel | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9171442 | Clements | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9247211 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9329269 | Zeng | May 2016 | B2 |
9349076 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9367831 | Besehanic | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9380222 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396554 | Williams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9400170 | Steffey | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9424482 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9443164 | Sulc | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9517767 | Kentley et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9542746 | Wu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549125 | Goyal et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9562971 | Shenkar et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9565400 | Curlander et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9589353 | Mueller-Fischer et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600731 | Yasunaga et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600892 | Patel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9639935 | Douady-Pleven et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9697429 | Patel et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9766074 | Roumeliotis et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9778388 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9779205 | Namir | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9791862 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805240 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9811754 | Schwartz | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827683 | Hance et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9880009 | Bell | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9928708 | Lin et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9953420 | Wolski et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9980009 | Jiang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9984451 | Gormish | May 2018 | B2 |
9994339 | Colson et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9996818 | Ren et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10019803 | Venable et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10111646 | Nycz et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10121072 | Kekatpure | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10127438 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10197400 | Jesudason et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10210603 | Venable et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10229386 | Thomas | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10248653 | Blassin et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10262294 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10265871 | Hance et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10289990 | Rizzolo | May 2019 | B2 |
10336543 | Sills et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10349031 | DeLuca | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10352689 | Brown et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10373116 | Medina et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10394244 | Song et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10453046 | Wu | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10565548 | Skaff | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10769582 | Williams | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20010031069 | Kondo et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041948 | Ross et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006231 | Jayant et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020059202 | Hadzikadic et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097439 | Braica | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020146170 | Rom | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158453 | Levine | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164236 | Fukuhara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003925 | Suzuki | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030094494 | Blanford et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030174891 | Wenzel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040021313 | Gardner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084527 | Bong et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040131278 | imagawa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040240754 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016004 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050114059 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050174351 | Chang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213082 | DiBernardo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213109 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060032915 | Schwartz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045325 | Zavadsky et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106742 | Bochicchio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060279527 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285486 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070036398 | Chen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074410 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272732 | Hindmon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002866 | Fujiwara | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025565 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027591 | Lenser et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077511 | Zimmerman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080159634 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164310 | Dupuy et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175513 | Lai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181529 | Michel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183730 | Enga | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080238919 | Pack | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294487 | Nasser | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090009123 | Skaff | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024353 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057411 | Madej et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090059270 | Opalach et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060349 | Linaker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063306 | Fano et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063307 | Groenovelt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074303 | Filimonova et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088975 | Sato et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094140 | Kwan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103773 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125350 | Lessing et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125535 | Basso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160975 | Kwan | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192921 | Hicks | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206161 | Olmstead | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236155 | Skaff | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252437 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287587 | Bloebaum et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017407 | Beniyama et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026804 | Tanizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070365 | Siotia et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082194 | Yabushita et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091094 | Sekowski | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118116 | Tomasz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131234 | Stewart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141806 | Uemura et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161569 | Schreter | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171826 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Setettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214873 | Somasundaram et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235033 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241289 | Sandberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257149 | Cognigni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295850 | Katz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315412 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326939 | Clark et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047636 | Stachon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052043 | Hyung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093306 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137527 | Simon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168774 | Magal | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172875 | Gibbs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110216063 | Hayes | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242286 | Pace et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246503 | Bender et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288816 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310088 | Adabala et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017028 | Tsirkin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019393 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022913 | Volkmann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051730 | Cote et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069051 | Hagbi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075342 | Choubassi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120133639 | Kopf et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169530 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179621 | Moir et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185112 | Sung et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194644 | Newcombe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197464 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201466 | Funayama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209553 | Doytchinov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236119 | Rhee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249802 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250978 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269383 | Bobbitt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287249 | Choo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307108 | Forutanpour | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308123 | Jo | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323620 | Hofman | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030700 | Miller et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130076586 | Karhuketo et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090881 | Janardhanan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119138 | Winkel | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132913 | Fu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130134178 | Lu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138246 | Gutmann et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142421 | Silver et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144565 | Miller et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154802 | O'Haire et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156292 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162806 | Ding et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176398 | Bonner et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178227 | Vartanian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182114 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226344 | Wong et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228620 | Ahern et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130232039 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235165 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235206 | Smith et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130236089 | Litvak et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278631 | Border et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279751 | Bruna | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299306 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130299313 | Baek, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300729 | Grimaud | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130303193 | Dharwada et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321418 | Kirk | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341400 | Lancaster-Larocque | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002597 | Taguchi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003655 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003727 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006229 | Birch et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016832 | Kong et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019311 | Tanaka | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025201 | Ryu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025420 | Joshi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028837 | Gao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047342 | Breternitz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049616 | Stettner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052555 | MacIntosh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140086483 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098094 | Neumann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129027 | Schnittman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156133 | Cullinane et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140161359 | Magri et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192050 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195374 | Bassemir et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214547 | Signorelli et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214600 | Argue et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140267614 | Ding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267688 | Aich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277691 | Jacobus et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277692 | Buzan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279294 | Field-Darragh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300637 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316875 | Tkachenko et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330835 | Boyer | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344401 | Varney et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351073 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140369607 | Patel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150015602 | Beaudoin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019391 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029339 | Kobres et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032304 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039458 | Reid | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052027 | Pavani | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150088618 | Basir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088701 | Desmarais et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088703 | Yan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092066 | Geiss et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106403 | Haverinen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117788 | Patel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150139010 | Jeong et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150146989 | Shiiyama | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154467 | Feng et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161793 | Takahashi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170256 | Pettyjohn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181198 | Baele et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150193909 | Maayan | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150212521 | Pack et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150235157 | Avegliano et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245358 | Schmidt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248592 | Wang | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150262116 | Katircioglu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279035 | Wolski et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298317 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310601 | Rodriguez et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150332368 | Vartiainen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150352721 | Wicks et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363625 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363758 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365660 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379704 | Chandrasekar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012588 | Taguchi et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026253 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160044862 | Kocer | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061591 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070981 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092943 | Vigier et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160104041 | Bowers et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107690 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112628 | Super et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119540 | Wu | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129592 | Saboo et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132815 | Itoko et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150217 | Popov | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156898 | Ren et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160163067 | Williams et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171336 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171429 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171707 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180533 | Pavani | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160185347 | Lefevre et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191759 | Somanath et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160224927 | Pettersson | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253735 | Scudillo et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160253844 | Petrovskaya et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160260054 | High et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160271795 | Vicenti | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160313133 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160328618 | Patel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160328767 | Bonner et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353099 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160364634 | Davis et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160379083 | Sala | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004649 | Collet Romea et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011281 | Dijkman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011308 | Sun et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032311 | Rizzolo | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041553 | Cao et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170054965 | Raab et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061416 | Morate | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170066459 | Singh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074659 | Giurgiu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170109940 | Guo et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170147966 | Aversa et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170150129 | Pangrazio | May 2017 | A1 |
20170177969 | Zaremski | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170178060 | Schwartz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170178227 | Gornish | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170178310 | Gornish | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170193434 | Shah | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219338 | Brown et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170219353 | Alesiani | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227645 | Swope et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227647 | Baik | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170228885 | Baumgartner | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170261993 | Venable et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262724 | Wu | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280125 | Brown et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170286773 | Skaff et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170286901 | Skaff et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323253 | Enssle et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170323376 | Glaser et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170337508 | Bogolea et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170358089 | Miyazato | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180001481 | Shah et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005035 | Bogolea et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005176 | Williams et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020145 | Kotfis et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180051991 | Hong | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053091 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053305 | Gu et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180075403 | Mascorro Medina et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089613 | Chen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180096555 | Schtein | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180101813 | Paat | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180108134 | Venable | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114183 | Howell | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180130011 | Jacobsson | May 2018 | A1 |
20180143003 | Clayton et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180174325 | Fu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190160 | Bryan et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180201423 | Drzewiecki et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204111 | Zadeh et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180251253 | Taira et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180260772 | Chaubard | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276596 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180281191 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180293442 | Fridental et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180293543 | Tiwari | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180306958 | Goss et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313956 | Rzeszutek et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314260 | Jen et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314908 | Lam | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315007 | Kingsford et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315065 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315173 | Phan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315865 | Haist et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180330175 | Corcoran | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180370727 | Hance et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190019030 | Cansizoglu | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190019293 | Woodroffe | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190034864 | Skaff | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190057588 | Savvides | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065861 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190073554 | Rzeszutek | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190073559 | Rzeszutek et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190073627 | Nakdimon et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190077015 | Shibasaki et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087663 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190094876 | Moore et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190108606 | Komiyama | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190156273 | Fisher | May 2019 | A1 |
20190156275 | Fisher | May 2019 | A1 |
20190178436 | Mao et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190180150 | Taylor | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190197439 | Wang | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190197728 | Yamao | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190236530 | Cantrell et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190304132 | Yoda et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190392212 | Sawhney et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200058129 | Guo | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200314333 | Liang et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200379111 | Kimura | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200385012 | Maruyama | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2835830 | Nov 2012 | CA |
3028156 | Jan 2018 | CA |
104200086 | Dec 2014 | CN |
107067382 | Aug 2017 | CN |
766098 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1311993 | May 2007 | EP |
2309378 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2439487 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2472475 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2562688 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2662831 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2693362 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2323238 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2330265 | Apr 1999 | GB |
2014170431 | Sep 2014 | JP |
101234798 | Jan 2009 | KR |
1020190031431 | Mar 2019 | KR |
WO 9923600 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 2003002935 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003025805 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2006136958 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007042251 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008057504 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008154611 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2012103199 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103202 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012154801 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013165674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014066422 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014092552 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014181323 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO 2015127503 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO 2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2018018007 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2018204308 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2018204342 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2019023249 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Using image analytics to monitor retail store shelves”; M. Marder, IBM Journal of Research and Development (vol. 59, Issue: 2/3, pp. 3:1-3:11) (Year: 2015). |
“Improved library shelf reading using color feature matching of book-spine images”; Fowers, S.G., 2010 11th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (pp. 2160-2165) (Year: 2010). |
“Supervised learning for Out-of-Stock detection in panoramas of retail shelves”; Luis Rosado, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) (pp. 406-411) (Year: 2016). |
“Toward real-time grocery detection for the visually impaired”; Winlock, T., 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—Workshops (pp. 49-56) (Year: 2010). |
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, Issn: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176- p. 178. |
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013. |
Flores, et al., “Removing Pedestrians from Google Street View Images”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference On, IEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 53-58 (Jun. 13, 2010). |
Glassner, “Space Subdivision for Fast Ray Tracing.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4.10, pp. 15-24,1984. |
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-Cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. |
Hackel et al., “Contour Detection in unstructured 3D point clouds,”IEEE, 2016 Conference on Computer vision and Pattern recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 1-9. |
Hao et al., “Structure-based object detection from scene point clouds,” Science Direct, V191, pp. 148-160 (2016). |
Hu et al., “An improved method of discrete point cloud filtering based on complex environment,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, v48, i18 (2013). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/070996 dated Apr. 2, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053212 dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/064110 dated Mar. 20, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030419 dated Aug. 31, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030345 dated Sep. 17, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030360 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030363 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025859 dated Jul. 3, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/025849 dated Jul. 9, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/051312 dated Nov. 15, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/064020 dated Feb. 19, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028133 dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/029134 dated Jul. 27, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028183 dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/035285 dated Aug. 27, 2020. |
Jadhav et al. “Survey on Spatial Domain dynamic template matching technique for scanning linear barcode,” International Journal of science and research v 5 n 3, Mar. 2016)(Year: 2016). |
Jian Fan et al: “Shelf detection via vanishing point and radial projection”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on image processing (Icip), IEEE, (2014-10-27), pp. 1575-1578. |
Kang et al., “Kinematic Path-Tracking of Mobile Robot Using Iterative learning Control”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, pp. 111-121. |
Kay et al. “Ray Tracing Complex Scenes.” Acm Siggraph Computer Graphics, vol. 20, No. 4, ACM, pp. 269-278, 1986. |
Kelly et al., “Reactive Nonholonomic Trajectory Generation via Parametric Optimal Control”, International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, No. 7-8, pp. 583-601 (Jul. 30, 2013). |
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammertry, Remote sensing and spatial information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada. |
Lecking et al.: “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features”, IEEE, pp. 333-337 (Sep. 15, 2008). |
Lee et al. “Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing.” Acm Siggraph Computer Graphics, vol. 19, No. 3, ACM, pp. 61-67, 1985. |
Li et al., “An improved RANSAC for 3D Point cloud plane segmentation based on normal distribution transformation cells,” Remote sensing, V9: 433, pp. 1-16 (2017). |
Likhachev, Maxim, and Dave Ferguson. “Planning Long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles.” The international journal of Robotics Reasearch 28.8 (2009): 933-945. (Year:2009). |
Marder-Eppstein et al., “The Office Marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” IEEE, 2010 International conference on robotics and automation, May 3-7, 2010, pp. 300-307. |
Mcnaughton, Matthew, et al. “Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
Meyersohn, “Walmart turns to robots and apps in stores”, https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/07/business/walmart-robot-janitors-dotcom-store/index.html, Oct. 29, 2019. |
Mitra et al., “Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data.” International Journal of Computational geometry & applications, Jun. 8-10, 2003, pp. 322-328. |
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automoatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25. |
Ni et al., “Edge Detection and Feature Line Tracing in 3D-Point Clouds by Analyzing Geometric Properties of Neighborhoods,” Remote Sensing, v8 I9, pp. 1-20 (2016). |
Norriof et al., “Experimental comparison of some classical iterative learning control algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2002, pp. 636-641. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/561,175 dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/695.503 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,495 dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/518,091 dated Apr. 12, 2017. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,103 dated Apr. 5, 2017. |
Olson, Clark F., et al. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010. |
Oriolo et al., “An iterative learning controller for nonholonomic mobile Robots”, the international Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 1997, pp. 954-970. |
Ostafew et al., “Visual Teach and Repeat, Repeat, Repeat: Iterative learning control to improve mobile robot path tracking in challenging outdoor environment”, 1EEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and Systems, Nov. 2013, p. 176-181. |
Park et al., “Autonomous mobile robot navigation using passive rfid in indoor environment,” IEEE, Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 56, issue 7, pp. 2366-2373 (Jul. 2009). |
Perveen et al. (An overview of template matching methodologies and its application, International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Technology, v2n10, Oct. 2013) (Year: 2013). |
Pivtoraiko et al., “Differentially constrained mobile robots motion planning in state lattices”, journal of field robotics, vol. 26, No. 3, 2009, pp. 308-333. |
Pratt W K Ed: “Digital image processing, 10-image enhancement, 17-image segmentation”, Jan. 1, 2001, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, New York: John Wily & Sons, US, pp. 243-258, 551. |
Puwein, J., et al.“Robust Multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks,”in IEEE Workshop on Applications of computer vision (WACV), Jan. 2011. |
Rusu, et al. “How to imcrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 22, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php. |
Rusu, et al. “Spatial Change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library retrieved from internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php]. |
Schnabel et al. “Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12 (1081). |
Senthilkumaran, et al., “Edge Detection Techniques for Image Segmentation-A Survery of Soft Computing Approaches”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2 (May 2009). |
Szeliski, “Modified Hough Transform”, Computer Vision. Copyright 2011, pp. 251-254. Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2017 [http://szeliski.org/book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf]. |
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,”International Arches of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253. |
Trevor et al., “Tables, Counter, and Shelves: Semantic Mapping of Surfaces in 3D,” Retrieved from Internet Jul. 3, 2018 @ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.5365&rep=rep1&type=p. |
Tseng, et al., “A Cloud Removal Approach for Aerial Image Visulation”, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 2421-2440 (Jun. 2013). |
Uchiyama, et al., “Removal of Moving Objects from a Street-View Image by Fusing Multiple Image Sequences”, Pattern Recognition, 2010, 20th International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ pp. 3456-3459 (Aug. 23, 2010). |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report” for GB Patent Application No. 1813580.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1521272.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 11, 2015 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated May 13, 2020 for GB Patent Application No. 1917864.9. |
Varol Gul et al: “Product placement detection based on image processing”, 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communication Applications Conference (SIU), IEEE, Apr. 23, 2014. |
Varol Gul et al: “Toward Retail product recognition on Grocery shelves”, Visual Communications and image processing; Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, (Mar. 4, 2015). |
Weber et al., “Methods for Feature Detection in Point clouds,” visualization of large and unstructured data sets—IRTG Workshop, pp. 90-99 (2010). |
Zhao Zhou et al.: “An Image contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using PLIP-based histrogram Modification”, 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCON), IEEE, (Jun. 21, 2017). |
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 2214-2221. |
Fan Zhang et al., “Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, 2014 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 4321-4328. |
Kaimo Lin et al., “SEAGULL: Seam-guided Local Alignment for Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2020 [http://publish.illinois.edu/visual-modeling-and-analytics/files/2016/08/Seagull.pdf]. |
Julio Zaragoza et al., “As-Projective-As-Possible Image Stitching with Moving DLT”, 2013 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 2339-2346. |
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated 2010-01-25 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn. |
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014. |
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006. |
Batalin et al., “Mobile robot navigation using a sensor network,” IEEE, International Conference on robotics and automation, Apr. 26, May 1, 2004, pp. 636-641. |
Bazazian et al., “Fast and Robust Edge Extraction in Unorganized Point clouds,” IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applicatoins (DICTA), Nov. 23-25, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
Biswas et al. “Depth Camera Based Indoor Mobile Robot Localization and Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2012. |
Bohm, Multi-Image Fusion for Occlusion-Free Facade Texturing, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 867-872 (Jan. 2004). |
Bristow et al., “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control”, IEEE Control Systems, Jun. 2006, pp. 96-114. |
Buenaposada et al. “Realtime tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700. |
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8, Apr. 24, 2013. |
Chen et al. “Improving Octree-Based Occupancy Maps Using Environment Sparsity with Application to Aerial Robot Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE. |
Cleveland Jones et al: “Automated System for Semantic Object Labeling with Soft-Object Recognition and Dynamic Programming Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY (Apr. 1, 2017). |
Cook et al., “Distributed Ray Tracing ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics”, vol. 18, No. 3, ACM pp. 137-145, 1984. |
Datta, A., et al. “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009. |
Deschaud, et al., “A Fast and Accurate Place Detection algoritm for large noisy point clouds using filtered normals and voxel growing,” 3DPVT, May 2010, Paris, France. |
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds.” Robotic and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2011. |
Dubois, M., et al., 'A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods, European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), p. 88-93, Sep. 25-27, 2013. |
Duda, et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, Graphics and Image Processing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan. 1972). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210183095 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |