This application is the US national phase of international application PCT/SE02/00231 filed 08 Feb. 2002, which designated the US.
The present invention relates to retransmissions in a communications system, and more especially it relates to a cellular mobile radio system, particularly to a Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, UMTS.
Retransmission of data to or from a mobile station, MS, or user equipment, UE, is previously known. It is also known to use a radio link control layer of a UMTS protocol structure in an acknowledged mode for dedicated channels.
In acknowledged mode, retransmissions are undertaken in case of detected transmission errors not recovered by forward error control. This is also called automatic repeat request, ARQ. With ARQ, retransmissions can be undertaken unless a transmitted message is (positively) acknowledged or if it is negatively acknowledged. Generally there are time limits for the respective positive and negative acknowledgements to be considered.
Within this patent application, a radio network controller, RNC, is understood as a network element including a radio resource controller. Node B is a logical node responsible for radio transmission/reception in one or more cells to/from User Equipment. A base station, BS, is a physical entity representing Node B.
Radio link control, RLC, is used within radio communications systems like General Packet Radio Services, GPRS, and UMTS.
International Patent Application WO0105121 describes a technique for providing a secure link in a mobile communication system including mechanisms for hard handover of a link in acknowledged mode. Data is tunneled.
A channel dedicated to a specific UE is referred to as a Dedicated Channel, DCH. A channel that is not a dedicated channel is called a common or shared channel.
UK patent application GB no. 0027148.6, describes channel switching between dedicated and common channels.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP): Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, Physical Layer Procedures, 3G TS 25.301 v3.6.0, France, September 2000, specifies in chapter 5 Radio Interface Protocol Architecture of a UMTS system. There are three protocol layers:
Layer 2, L2, and layer 3, L3 are divided into Control and User Planes. Layer 2 consists of two sub-layers, RLC and MAC, for the Control Plane and 4 sub-layers, BMC, PDCP, RLC and MAC, for the User Plane. The acronyms BMC, PDCP, RLC and MAC denote Broadcast/Multicast Control, Packet Data Convergence Protocol, Radio Link Control and Medium Access Control respectively.
Radio Access Bearers, RABs, make available radio resources (and services) to user applications. For each mobile station there may be one or several RABs. Data flows (in the form of segments) from the RABs are passed to respective Radio Link Control, RLC, entities which amongst other tasks buffer the received data segments. There is one RLC entity for each RAB. In the RLC layer, RABs are mapped onto respective logical channels. A Medium Access Control, MAC, entity receives data transmitted in the logical channels and further maps logical channels onto a set of transport channels. One transport channel is Downlink Shared Channel, DSCH.
Transport channels are finally mapped to a single physical transport channel which has a total bandwidth allocated to it by the network. In frequency division duplex mode, a physical channel is defined by code, frequency and, in the uplink, relative phase (I/Q). In time division duplex mode a physical channel is defined by code, frequency, and time-slot. The DSCH, e.g., is mapped onto one or several physical channels such that a specified part of the downlink resources is employed.
PDCP provides mapping between Network PDUs (Protocol Data Units) of a network protocol, e.g. the Internet protocol, to an RLC entity. PDCP compresses and decompresses redundant Network PDU control information (header compression and decompression).
For transmissions on point-to-multipoint logical channels, BMC stores at UTRAN side Broadcast messages received from an RNC, calculates the required transmission rate and requests for the appropriate channel resources. It receives scheduling information from the RNC, and generates schedule messages. For transmission the messages are mapped on a point-to-multipoint logical channel. At the UE side, BMC evaluates the schedule messages and deliver Broadcast Messages to upper layer in the UE.
3G TS 25.301 also describes protocol termination, i.e. in which node of the UTRAN the radio interface protocols are terminated, or equivalently, where within UTRAN the respective protocol services are accessible. Section 5.6.5 describes protocol termination for DSCH. The RLC protocol for DSCH is terminated in Serving Radio Network Controller, SRNC, for both the control and user planes.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP): Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, Physical Layer Procedures, 3G TS 25.322 v3.5.0, France, December 2000, specifies the RLC protocol. The RLC layer provides three services to the higher layers:
Subsections 4.2.1.1 and 4.2.1.2 describe transparent mode entities and unacknowledged mode entities. Basically, RLC differences of the two modes reside in management of packet overhead. In transparent mode no overhead is added or removed by RLC. In subsection 4.2.1.3 an acknowledged mode entity, AM-entity, is described (see FIG. 4.4 of the 3GPP Technical Specification). In acknowledged mode automatic repeat request, ARQ, is used. The RLC sub-layer provides ARQ functionality closely coupled with the radio transmission technique used. The three modes
None of the cited documents above discloses a dynamic RLC configuration and termination point.
In accordance with 3G TS 25.301, no macrodiversity is applied for DSCH, i.e., a specific DSCH is transmitted in a single cell only. As described above, the RLC protocol, and correspondingly the ARQ, is terminated in the serving RNC (SRNC). However, when the DSCH is transmitted in only a single cell at a time, the retransmission delay would reduce considerably if retransmissions were terminated in the BS, as the round trip delay would be decreased.
When a UE is distant to a base station, retransmission requests are likely to be transmitted to one or more base stations that did not transmit data at first instance. Retransmission will then involve transmissions between the two or more BSes and involve an RNC, nullifying the advantage of a termination point located in the BS, and potentially increasing retransmission delay.
Further, when a user equipment, like UE 1 in
Consequently, an object is to achieve a method and system of fast retransmissions to a UE near a BS and allowing for robust retransmissions using soft handover when necessary.
It is also an object to present an adaptive relocation of transmitting point.
These objects are met by dynamically switching between RLC configurations depending on radio conditions and UE locations. The RLC configuration and the location of transmitting point are adapted to UE location, number of transmitters and PDU size. Relocation is preferably achieved by means of RLC tunneling.
Preferred embodiments, by way of examples, are described with reference to the accompanying drawings below.
With reference to
In an exemplary situation UE communicates over a radio link associated with BS 1. Packet switched data is transmitted in protocol data units, PDUs, in both directions. If a protocol data unit PDU is received in error and the error is not recovered by forward error correction, the PDU is retransmitted.
In accordance with 3G TS 25.301, no macrodiversity is applied for DSCH, i.e., a specific DSCH is transmitted in a single cell only. As described above the RLC protocol, and correspondingly the ARQ, is terminated in the RNC. However, when the DSCH is transmitted in only a single cell at a time, the retransmission delay is reduced considerably by terminating retransmissions in BS 1 or Node B 1 in place of the RNC as the round trip delay is thereby decreased.
An ARQ-machine is a physical entity from which retransmissions are initiated. In
With reference to
Excessive retransmissions reduce throughput and system performance. Soft handover can reduce the amount of transmission errors not recovered.
In
Consequently, when user equipment UE is not involved in soft handover, it is advantageous in terms of time delay to have retransmissions terminated in a Node B, Node B 1, see
Thus, an ARQ machine, not being fixed to one geographical location, is introduced which can be dynamically relocated between a Node B and an RNC as need be to achieve a sufficiently small retransmission delay. Four example alternatives of relocation of an ARQ-machine are considered:
A network layer PDU or L3 PDU can comprise several RLC PDUs, as illustrated in
Protocol State Transfer moves/transfers the whole protocol state, including state variables and buffers to the new network node.
With Multiple ARQ Protocols, data is secured by having two or more levels of ARQ protocols. One protocol level is run between UE and Node B, another protocol level is run between UE and RNC. Upon relocation, no particular measures need to be undertaken for PDUs in the old ARQ machine, as a potential loss of data is recovered by higher level ARQ protocols.
In Service Data Unit transfer, SDUs are buffered until all RLC PDUs carrying an SDU are successfully transmitted. Upon relocation, all stored (complete) SDUs are moved from the old ARQ-machine to the new ARQ machine. The SDUs are segmented into RLC PDUs and transmitted at the new ARQ-machine.
Finally, using RLC tunneling for relocation of an ARQ-machine there will be two RLC protocols considered: the old/existing RLC protocol and a new RLC protocol at the new location. One or more RLC PDUs buffered but not yet successfully transmitted to the destination from the old RLC protocol are tunneled through the new RLC protocol. The old RLC protocol does not perform the ARQ function of the tunneled RLC PDUs. In reverse direction, the old RLC protocol assembles old RLC PDUs provided by the new RLC protocol until a SDU or L3 PDU, only partially completed at the time of relocation, is completed. Subsequent SDUs or L3 PDUs will be assembled at the new RLC protocol. In UMTS the ARQ protocols are RLC protocols. This technology also applies if other than the RLC protocol is used for ARQ.
RLC tunneling also enables RLC reconfiguration in the new retransmission point. This is important as performance can be improved in the new location by a change of e.g. PDU size.
In one example embodiment, two or more of the basic alternatives for relocation are implemented. However, only one alternative is on at a time the other alternatives being switched off.
A person skilled in the art readily understands that the receiver and transmitter properties of a BS or a UE are general in nature. The use of concepts such as BS, UE or RNC within this patent application is not intended to limit the technology to devices associated with these acronyms. It concerns all devices operating correspondingly, or adaptable thereto by a person skilled in the art. Explicit non-exclusive examples include mobile stations without a subscriber identity module, SIM, as well as user equipment including one or more SIMs. Further, protocols and layers are referred to in close relation with UMTS terminology. However, this does not exclude applicability of the technology in other systems such as GPRS or with other protocols and layers of similar functionality.
The invention is not intended to be limited only to the example embodiments described in detail above. Changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention. All modifications within the scope of the following claims are covered.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0100475 | Feb 2001 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE02/00231 | 2/8/2002 | WO | 00 | 9/9/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/065797 | 8/22/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5101501 | Gilhousen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5267261 | Blakeney et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5671219 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5787346 | Iseyama | Jul 1998 | A |
5970435 | Ito | Oct 1999 | A |
6208620 | Sen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6301479 | Roobol et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6381232 | Strawczynski et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393273 | Anderson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6507567 | Willars | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6615269 | Suumaki et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6799039 | Wu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804532 | Moon et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6888803 | Gentry et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901257 | Kubota | May 2005 | B2 |
6907005 | Dahlman et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7012905 | Haumont et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016321 | Park et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7088701 | Attar et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099289 | Varma | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7242933 | Ahmavaara | Jul 2007 | B1 |
20010012279 | Haumont et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020080719 | Parkvall et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094810 | Hassan | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020126637 | Refai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050094667 | Dahlman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050237994 | Fong et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060083184 | Haumont et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070270100 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0898438 | Feb 1999 | EP |
2361392 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2 369 003 | May 2002 | GB |
9951051 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0005909 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0105121 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0120938 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040146033 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |