The present invention is directed to an improvement in database systems and in particular to the recovery of tables dropped from databases.
In relational databases, data is organized into tables. A collection of such tables in a database is referred to as a table space. Database users sometimes inadvertently delete, or drop, a table from a table space. Typically, a database management system (DBMS) does not permit undelete of the drop action: once the table drop is committed, the table's data is permanently deleted and cannot be brought back by way of such a command as an undelete of the drop statement. Instead, the data must be restored from a backup and then the data rolled forward by replaying stored transactions on the data, a potentially slow process.
In certain DBMS environments, such as DB2**, recovering a dropped table is made even more difficult by the fact that a table space restore followed by a roll forward of the table space to a point in time prior to the drop cannot be done. This restriction means that to roll forward to recover a dropped table, the entire database, and not only the effected table space, must be rolled forward. This restriction on the roll forward of the table space is due to the minimum recovery time property. A table space must be rolled forward to at least the minimum recovery time so that it is synchronized with the information in the system catalog tables. The minimum recovery time is updated when data definition language (DDL) statements are executed against a table space, or against tables in a table space.
The minimum recovery time will be later than the time at which the table was dropped. Because of this fact, it is a requirement in typical DBMS environments that the user must recover the entire database. This means that the entire database becomes unavailable to other users while the recovery and rollforward of the database is being carried out. It is typically slower to perform the recovery and restore on the entire database than a recovery and rollforward on the effected table space, only.
The only means in which a dropped table can be currently recovered in many relational databases, such as DB2, is through a database restore followed by a database roll forward to a point in time just prior to the table drop. As indicated above, such an approach will make the database as a whole unavailable to users. It may also be difficult to pinpoint when a table was dropped and therefore data will often be inaccurately retrieved due to uncertainties about when the table in question was dropped. In addition, the structure of the table may no longer be accurately known.
It is therefore desirable to have a DBMS in which tables that have been dropped may be recovered without the need to recover and roll forward the entire database and which permits the point at which the table was dropped to be determined with some accuracy, as well as to determine the structure of the table at the time of the drop.
A method, system, and program for recovering a dropped table are provided. One or more table spaces are specified prior to one or more tables being dropped from the specified one or more table spaces. When a table is to be dropped from the one or more specified table spaces, a table identifier, a time stamp, and table definition attributes are stored for the dropped table in a data structure and the table is dropped. Upon receiving a request to restore a table space from the one or more specified table spaces, each of the one or more tables in the table space being restored is recovered using the data structure.
According to another aspect of the preferred embodiments, there is provided a computer program product for use with a computer comprising a central processing unit and random access memory, said computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable code means embodied in said medium for managing a database, as described with respective to the above systems.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represents corresponding parts throughout:
In the drawing, the preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawing are only for the purpose of illustration and as an aid to understanding, and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention.
Referring to
If this flag is turned on for a table space, the system of the preferred embodiments will create an entry in a dropped table history 14 data structure, when a table (tsl, in the above example) is dropped from pre-drop table space 10. Dropped table history 14 records a dropped table ID, which is a unique identifier for the dropped table. Dropped table history 14 also provides a timestamp which reflects the time at which the dropped table was dropped from the table space, as well as information about the structure of the table (table definition attributes). The option to record an entry in the dropped table history 14 is table space specific. In the preferred embodiments, the flag may be queried in the “syscat.tablespaces” catalog table. There is a drop_recovery column which may be queried. The flag may be turned “off” and “on” by the user as required. When a table is dropped in the system of the preferred embodiments, the status of the flag is determined by the system and if the flag is “on”, then information about the dropped table is stored in dropped table history 14.
In the system of the preferred embodiments, the dropped table history 14 may be accessed by the LIST HISTORY DROPPED TABLE command. This command returns the dropped table ID, timestamp of the drop, and information about the structure of the table. An example of the command for the database test_db is as follows:
After accessing the dropped table history 14 in this way, the user of the system of the preferred embodiments may then restore the table space. An example of such a command for table space tsl in database test_db is:
In
To accomplish this the user specifies a file location and the table data as it existed prior to drop will be written to the file as a flat file with ASCII delimiters. An example rollforward command for the database test_db, table space tsl, dropped table ID “00000000000000b60000” is shown where the flat file representation of the table is to be stored in file location/temp/ffile.
With reference to
By replaying transactions on the table space only, rather than on the database as a whole, the database remains available for use by other users and the time to recover the dropped table is potentially shorter. The data from the dropped table is stored in flat file 26 to permit the data to be recovered into a table space which has different attributes than the table space from which the table was dropped. Dropped table history 14 includes dropped table characteristics which permit the table to be redefined in intermediate recovered table space 34 by create table command 32.
In SQL commands, the above procedure may be carried out using the following steps. An example of how to define the table into which the dropped table data will be copied is the following SQL command:
The table is then repopulated from flat file 25 using a command:
As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, there are other variations on the above approach to recovering the dropped table, given the system of the preferred embodiment. In particular, the recovery of the dropped table may be accomplished by restoring the database as a whole into a different system than the first database. The table space can then be restored in the second system and the rollforward and recovery of the dropped table carried out “offline”. This will permit the existing database to be used without making even the table space of the dropped table unavailable to users of the system. Another alternative to the steps described above is to make a copy of the current table space before carrying out the restore of the table space. Once flat file 26 is created, transactions 28 may be ignored and recovered table space 30 may be created by restoring the copy of the current table space, rather than by replaying transactions 28 on pre-drop table space 24. This alternative approach is advantageous where there are significant numbers of transactions in transactions 28.
As will also be apparent to those skilled in the art, flat file 26 may have other uses, and the data in flat file 26 may be exported to other applications or used in the database in other contexts than the repopulation of the dropped table.
Although preferred embodiments have been described here in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, that variations may be made thereto, without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2279028 | Jul 1999 | CA | national |
This patent application claims priority from the commonly assigned Canadian Patent Application entitled “Dropped Database Table Recovery”, having Canadian Patent Application Ser. No. 2,279,028, filed on Jul. 29, 1999 by Effi Offer, Roger Luo Q. Zheng, Matthew A. Huras, Michael J. Winer, and Dale M. Mclnnis and is a continuation of and claims the benefit of a U.S. patent application entitled “Dropped Database Table Recovery,” having U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,225, U.S. application Ser. No. 09/626,673, filed on Jul. 27, 2000 by Effi Offer, Roger Luo Q. Zheng, Matthew A. Huras, Michael J. Winer, and Dale M. Mclnnis, each of which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4697266 | Finley | Sep 1987 | A |
5295256 | Bapat | Mar 1994 | A |
5553279 | Goldring | Sep 1996 | A |
5555404 | Torbjornsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5596710 | Voigt | Jan 1997 | A |
5625815 | Maier et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5646871 | Cadot | Jul 1997 | A |
5802514 | Huber | Sep 1998 | A |
5873102 | Bridge et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5890167 | Bridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5918225 | White et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930795 | Chen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937415 | Sheffield et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987472 | Serafin | Nov 1999 | A |
5999192 | Selfridge et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003026 | Bonzi | Dec 1999 | A |
6073129 | Levine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6112024 | Almond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115704 | Olson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122640 | Pereira | Sep 2000 | A |
6144970 | Bonner et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157928 | Sprenger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6289334 | Reiner et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6606617 | Bonner et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6684225 | Huras et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6792435 | Ruddy | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7028022 | Lightstone et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031987 | Mukkamalla et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20010051956 | Bird | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040103109 | Huras et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050114365 | Tucker | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2249080 | Dec 2001 | CA |
2419883 | Aug 2004 | CA |
1201950 | Dec 1998 | CN |
0690367 | Jan 1996 | EP |
1385100 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2279165 | Dec 1994 | GB |
61082227 | Apr 1986 | JP |
63211445 | Sep 1988 | JP |
3022152 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3116249 | May 1991 | JP |
4178846 | Jun 1992 | JP |
4188342 | Jul 1992 | JP |
5181729 | Jul 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040103109 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09626673 | Jul 2000 | US |
Child | 10718009 | US |