The invention relates generally to sheet folding and inserting machines, and more particularly to, a method to expand the capacity of a sheet feeder.
In most paper handling equipment (such as: printers, copiers, facsimile machines, mailing machines, inserters, etc.) there is an apparatus for repeatedly feeding sheets from a supply or stack of sheets. Paper handling equipment is typically characterized by the functions it performs and the different types of sheets (cut copy or print sheets, original sheets, envelopes, post cards, checks, etc.) which it operates on. Generally, it is desirable to remove a single sheet from the stack and thereafter perform one or more functions on the sheet. The process of removing an individual sheet from the stack is commonly referred to in the industry as singulation or separation and the apparatus which performs this function is commonly referred to as a sheet feeder, singulator or separator. As the singulation process is repeated, a stream of individuals sheets is created. In this manner, a high degree of automation is achievable.
The efficiency of the sheet feeder is measured by: (1) its ability to consistently singulate and feed sheets from a stack without producing misfeeds; and (2) the speed at which the sheet feeder operates. One type of common misfeed to be avoided is a multi-feed which occurs when two or more sheets are removed from the stack and fed downstream together. This causes problems for the paper handling equipment, such as jams, which often require operator intervention to correct. Another type of common misfeed is a stall which occurs when the sheet feeder fails to feed any sheet at all. Therefore, it is desirable to have the sheet feeder operate within a processing window between stalls and multi-feeds where only single sheets are fed downstream.
Additionally, it is desirable to have the sheet feeder operate at high speed so that overall throughput of the paper handling equipment is achieved. Thus, a reliable and fast sheet feeder results in more efficient and cost effective paper handling equipment. However, increasing the speed of the sheet feeder often has the resulting negative consequence of increasing the likelihood of misfeeds. Additionally, the problem of misfeeds is complicated by a number of other factors. For example, static electricity, adhesion/cohesion and frictional drag between the sheets all act to generate a tendency for the sheets to remain together and resist singulation.
In addition to the factors above space is usually at a premium, thus it is desirable to achieve the maximum capacity of a sheet feeder given a fixed space. Multiple existing sheet feeders employ an elevator or other lift mechanism to increase the capacity of the feeder. Such mechanisms support the stack of sheets and advance the sheets to the feeder based on a demand signal from the feed system. It is also advantageous to design the lift mechanism so the lift mechanism can be de-coupled from the paper tray which enhances the service and manufacture of the feed system. It is also desirable to provide adequate user access for reloading the feed system with sheets. Existing feeders typically utilize a linear lift mechanism which require that the components and structure encompass the paper tray, which limits access and can prohibit the decoupling of the tray assembly from the lift mechanism.
This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by combining the sheet capacity of a pivoting feed head with a complimentary pivoting design for the paper tray lift, such that a large total capacity of sheets is attained within a compact space, while allowing the lifting mechanisms to be located outside of the perimeter of the paper tray.
In the invention described herein a portion of the feed capacity is achieved through the pivoting of the feed head. When the feed head has exhausted the capacity enabled by its pivoting motion a demand signal from the feed system initiates the advancement of the paper lift mechanism. The lift mechanism pivots about an axis parallel to the feed head's pivot axis. The direction of the feed head is descending to feed from the stack and it's rotation about the pivot is counter clockwise. The direction of the tray to advance sheets to the feed head replenish the stack is counter clockwise in this configuration. It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that the arrangements of the feed head and tray lead to the rotation directions described herein and other compatible configurations may be achieved.
The lift mechanism employs sensors to detect the states of the feed system, including the states of “tray fully lowered,” “tray fully lifted” and “feeder requires additional sheets”. The invention enables the user access to the tray for the purpose of loading and jam clearance by configuring the majority of the lift mechanism to one end of the tray.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
In describing the present invention, reference is made to the drawings, wherein similar reference numerals in
In
Referring now to the drawings in detail and more particularly to
The tray assembly 11 contains a fixed cover 25 which slopes downward from the tray feed end 16 to the tray load end 17.
The paper support 21 is lifted by a paper lift arm 51 that pivots about an axis 52 that is perpendicular to the orientation of
The head life arm 81 pivots about an axis 80 and is displaced by the feed cam lift surface 77 when the cam assembly is rotated. The head life arm 80 contains a roller 83 that rotates against a roller surface 84 of feed head 60. Roller 83 displaces feeder 60 about an axis 61 lifting feed nudger 62 off of the paper sheet 15 permitting simply loading of paper 14 into feed tray assembly 12.
The feed head 60 is connected to feed tower 13 through a pivot 61, which is perpendicular to the orientation of
When a number of successive paper sheet 15 singulations have occurred, the head 60 rotates such that the rib 65 blocks sensor 63 and causes a state change. The state change signals cam assembly 70 to advance which causes paper lift arm 51 to raise paper support 21, which raises the paper stack 14, which lifts the head 60 through the contact between paper stack 14 and feed nudger 62. When the head 60 is raised the sensor 63 changes state and stops the advancement of cam assembly 70.
Cam assembly 70 has an inner segment 71 and an outer segment 72. The segments 71 and 72 pass through two optical sensors 73 and 74. as cam 70 rotates around the cam axis 75, the segments 71 and 72 are located with a specific angular timing relationship to the paper support lift cam surface 76 and the feed cam lift surface 77. The angular timing arrangement produces sensor transitions at specific points of system control activity such as “head fully lifted”, “tray support fully lifted”, feed head fully pivoting” as respectively shown in
The total angular movement A of paper support 21 with respect to the base 20 of tray assembly 11 is between 0 degrees and 60 degrees with a typical angular motion of 0 degrees to 25 degrees. The feed head 60 undergoes a similar angular displacement B between 0 degrees and 50 degrees with a typical angular motion between 0 degrees and 20 degrees.
The above specification describes a new and improved method to expand the capacity of a sheet feeder. It is realized that the above description may indicate to those skilled in the art additional ways in which the principles of this invention may be used without departing from the spirit. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
This Application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/795,690 filed Apr. 28, 2006, which is owned by the assignee of the present Application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4319740 | Ulseth | Mar 1982 | A |
4667949 | Goodwin et al. | May 1987 | A |
5100122 | Noda et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5292117 | Takagi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
6000689 | Furuki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6988723 | Kitami et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7267335 | Kubo | Sep 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070284807 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60795690 | Apr 2006 | US |