Patent Application
20090014177
The present invention broadly relates to well cementing. More particularly the invention relates to servicing apparatus for completing downhole wells from a subterranean reservoir, such as for instance an oil and gas reservoir or a water reservoir comprising a liner, a perforated tubular or any type of permeable tubular or screen.
After a well has been drilled, the conventional practice in the oil industry consists in filling the well with a metal casing. The casing is lowered down the hole and cement is pumped inside the casing and returns through the annulus where it is allowed to set. Lining the well aims at a dual purpose: preventing the bore walls from collapsing and isolating the various geological strata and thus, avoiding exchange of fluids between them. Furthermore, it can be useful also for different reasons to fill the well with a permeable screen (meaning not impermeable as metal casing) as perforated tubular, tubular with other openings, slotted liner, sand screen or expandable screen. Use of such permeable screen aims for example in preventing the bore walls from collapsing, and allowing the oil to flow from production zones into the horizontal hole by retaining debris. However, when a permeable screen is present downhole, there is no simple way to cement the annulus. Effectively, conventional technique where cement is pumped inside the casing to be returned through the annulus will not work, because the cement will pass through the first openings of the permeable screen and no cement will be pumped at the other extremity.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,817,415 discloses a method of sealing an annulus surrounding a slotted liner by using magnets placed on the outside of the liner. However, those magnets have to be placed prior to running in the hole. And so, if the liner is already in place underground then it is not possible to place the magnets outside the liner. Further, U.S. Pat. No. 6,817,415 does not address density differences between the fluid and cement and relies on a magnetic field to prevent cement slumping.
Another technique uses external casing packers (ECP) to isolate the annulus of a slotted liner. However the ECP must be placed on the liner prior to running the liner into the hole. Also, a significant number of liners are already in place underground where devices/ports for cementing were not included in the original design.
Other techniques have addressed isolation of liners already placed downhole. U.S. Pat. No. 5,697,441 discloses a packer called a Chemical External Casing Packer (CECP), which is able to inject a gel into the annulus developing thixotropic properties to seal off annular flow. However this method has proven operationally difficult to realize and is not currently used in the field. U.S. Pat. No. 6,253,850, discloses an expandable device which is placed underground to expand the slotted liner against the formation. Then a solid liner is placed to seal the wellbore. However, this method also include some problems as the quality of the formation/liner seal, as excessive splits or rips occurring during the expansion of the slotted liner. All this may compromise the quality of the annular seal. Additional working time is then required to pump resin into the liner and seal the leaks.
Hence, it remains the need for a method of cementing the annulus or a method of treatment of the earth formation, behind a perforated casing, a slotted liner or an expandable and permeable screen which avoid drawbacks cited therein.
The invention described herewith provides an improvement on the prior art, because it can be implemented on the large number of horizontal slotted liners already deployed underground. Also, the current invention has operational simplicity, using conventional techniques of cementing, and individual fluid systems that have proven to be pumpable in the field. Some problems associated with traditional cementing techniques were avoided e.g. cement slumping (where the cement moves after placement causing channeling, contamination and poor coverage), cement falling back through the slots and stuck pipe (where cement falls on top of the placement mechanism). As such, this invention increases the probability of quality cement coverage, reduces cement contamination due to slumping, prevents cement falling through the slots and reduces the probability of undesirable stuck pipe situations.
A method of treating a zone of a well is disclosed, the well comprises a wellbore, a tube which is permeable to settable material, the tube forming an annulus with the wellbore; and wherein the zone is located in the annulus. The method comprises the steps of: (i) placing inside said tube a first plug; (ii) creating on said tube a first opening and a second opening, so that: the zone be located between said first and second openings and the first opening be located between said zone and said first plug; (iii) placing inside said tube a second plug, so that said second plug is located between said second opening and said zone; (iv) injecting a settable material inside said tube between said second and first plugs, so that settable material fills the annulus and the zone by passing through the first opening; and (v) eliminating said second plug. Preferably, the wellbore section to be treated is highly deviated (45 degrees to 90 degrees) and contains an area open to flow (i.e. mesh sand screens or slotted liner). Initially a device to divert flow (such as a packer or viscous pill) is placed inside the liner and below the zone of interest. The annulus between the wellbore and placement device (coil tubing/drill pipe) is opened to allow flow back to surface.
Advantageously, the method further comprises the step of drilling inside said tube excess of material and/or the step of waiting that the setting material sets. Also in a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises after the step of drilling inside said tube, the step of cleaning the inside of said tube to remove debris.
Preferably, the method further comprises after the step of placing inside said tube a second plug, the steps of: (i) injecting inside said tube between said second and first plugs, a fluid comprising lost circulation material; and (ii) circulating said fluid inside the tube and the annulus via the first and second openings, such that lost circulation material fills surface of the tube and said tube becomes impermeable to said settable material. Advantageously said fluid spacer contains fibers. The lost circulation material plugs the slots in the liner and the flow is diverted axially toward the first opening. The spacer is then diverted through the first opening and flows back along the liner/formation annulus toward the surface. The lost circulation material concentration is sufficient to plug the smaller slots of the slotted liner but not sufficient to plug the larger first opening. Also the density of the fluid comprising fibers and the density of the settable material are chosen preferably the same.
In a first embodiment, the step of creating the first and/or second opening is done by perforating the tube or by other techniques such as mechanical cutting tool or abrasive techniques (commercially knows as AbrasiJET) which create the opening by focusing high velocity abrasive fluid onto the liner. In a second embodiment, the step of placing the second plug is done by inflating a packer surrounding a setting pipe inside the tube. And so the step of injecting the settable material is done by injecting the settable material by the setting pipe. Also, in said second embodiment preferably, the step of eliminating the second plug is done by deflating the packer.
In another embodiment, the wellbore comprises a fracture near the zone, and the method further comprises the step of pre-treatment of the wellbore by filling the fracture with a gel.
In another embodiment the method further comprises after the step of injecting the settable material, the step of injecting inside said tube between said second and first plugs, a second fluid following the settable material in such a way that said second fluid fills only the tube between first and second plugs and not do go in the annulus. Said second fluid is preferably of the type spacer, advantageously with a lost circulation material e.g. fibers. Advantage of this further step is that the settable material will be contaminated with the spacer, or even will be replaced by the spacer. So, the drilling step will be easier to realize, because volume of set material to drill will be reduced or at least weakened due to the presence of a mixture set material/spacer.
In another aspect it is disclosed a method of cementing a zone of a well comprising a wellbore, a tube which is permeable to cement slurry, said tube forming an annulus with the wellbore; and wherein said zone is located in the annulus, the method comprising the steps of: (i) placing inside said tube a first plug; (ii) creating on said tube a first opening and a second opening, so that: the zone be located between said first and second openings and the first opening be located between said zone and said first plug; (iii) placing inside said tube a second plug, so that said second plug is located between said second opening and said zone; (iv) injecting cement inside said tube between said second and first plugs, so that cement fills the annulus and the zone by passing through the first opening; and (v) eliminating said second plug; and (vi) waiting that the cement sets.
Preferably, the method further comprises after the step of placing inside said tube a second plug, the steps of (i) injecting inside said tube between said second and first plugs, a fluid comprising lost circulation material; and (ii) circulating said fluid inside the tube and the annulus via the first and second openings, such that lost circulation material fills surface of the tube and said tube becomes impermeable to said cement slurry.
Advantageously, the cement is used with a lost circulation material e.g. fibers. Preferably, the density of the fluid comprising fibers and the density of the cement slurry are the same. The slots between the upper and lower perforations are already partially plugged due to the spacer and lost circulation material combination. Lost circulation material in the cement is pushed against the existing lost circulation material in the slots and so that radial flow is blocked and diverted axially along the inside of the slotted liner. The cement flows through the first opening in the lower end and into the formation/liner annulus. Rheology hierarchy is maintained so the cement has higher viscosity than the spacer, which has higher viscosity than the original wellbore fluid. This ensures effective fluid separation while placing the fluids in the annulus. The volume of the cement is calculated so the cement in the annular section does not overlap with the placement device i.e. the cement injected is calculated to be the cement needed for the zone. This prevents the cement from falling back on top of the placement mechanism therefore preventing stuck pipe. Slumping (where cement is placed and then moves due to density differences) is prevented because the initial wellbore fluid, spacer and cement are designed with similar density (±2 ppg). The cement from inside the slotted liner can then be drilled out, creating an annular seal in the zone of interest.
Preferably the method comprises the step of drilling inside said tube excess of set cement or the step of cleaning the inside of said tube to remove debris after drilling.
Drilling out the cement will result in debris invading the injection/production zone. In addition the spacer and lost circulation material fluid will contaminate zones around the upper and lower ends of the cement section. This contamination increases the wellbore skin of this region (i.e. reduce the ability of the injected/produced fluids to flow in/out of the slotted liner). These contaminated regions are then cleaned up using a high powered jetting device.
In another embodiment the method further comprises after the step of injecting cement, the step of injecting inside said tube between said second and first plugs, a second fluid following cement in such a way that said second fluid fills only the tube between first and second plugs and not do go in the annulus.
Further embodiments of the present invention can be understood with the appended drawings:
The present invention involves the use of two inflatable packers (or similar) that selectively isolates a portion of a permeable tube such as a perforated casing, or a slotted liner or an expandable and permeable screen, this isolation allowing the further treatment of the annulus zone between the permeable tube and the borehole, such treatment can be for instance a cementing operation to stop or reduce water arrivals in that zone. The typical applications for which the method of the invention can be used include sand control and support of wellbore producing formations, in water, oil and/or gas wells. The method of the invention can be used also in all type of geometry of wellbores, but the method is particularly preferred in application with highly deviated or horizontal wellbores.
Particularly, the invention relates to horizontal liner cementing and placement of cement between a highly deviated slotted liner and the formation. The method has been optimized so that quality cement can be placed in the slotted liner/formation annulus of a highly deviated wellbore.
Method of the invention is used in a well comprising a permeable tube 10. The permeable tube 10 is placed inside the well and forms an annulus 11 between said tube 10 and a wellbore 12. The permeable tube 10 is a perforated tubular, a tubular with other openings, a slotted liner or a screen (standalone, expandable, prepacked, or a perforated tube surrounded by a screen) or any type of tubular with communication means. The tube 10 is at least permeable to one material—permeable, meaning allowing the flowing of said one material through said tube—. Further, the tube 10 can be impermeable or can play the rule of a barrier to another material—impermeable, meaning not allowing the flowing of said another material through said tube—. In instance, the material is preferably cement slurry. The tube 10 can also be for example a type of sieve, where the tube allows the crossing of a material or morphology of material, as water or fine sand; and blocks the crossing of another material or morphology of material, as stone or medium sand.
The method of the invention is a method of treatment of a zone 60 of the well which can be called a non-invasive method. Zone is defined as a part of the well or a region of the well which is delimited, but which can be quite small—from one cubic meter to ten cubic meters—and which can also be quite large—from hundred cubic meters to ten thousand cubic meters—. The zone 60 is located in the annulus 11.
In the yard test model, the fluid 8 used is a spacer with fibers of the type CemNET. CemNET is at a concentration of 6 lb/bbl. At this concentration a good coverage of the slotted liner is realized. The fibers continued to plug the slots and the spacer continued to flow axially along the slotted liner. However, the fibers concentration is not sufficient to plug the large perforated holes, and so the flow of the spacer along the annulus was observed during yard testing. A darker concentration of spacer at the lower end indicates that the spacer has traveled axially along the inner slotted liner and has emerged from the large holes into the slotted liner/outer pipe annulus. Another important observation was the impact of using equal density fluid. The original water in the model was sea water with a density of 8.6 ppg and the spacer was a commercial product known as MUDPUSH with density of 8.6 ppg. The spacer did not slump in the annulus; it maintained a relatively stable interface in both tests. This indicates that using similar density fluids prevents the slumping effect in horizontal liners. Once the spacer passes the CoilFLATE packer the fluid is diverted to flow from the formation/liner annulus, through the upper perforations and towards the surface. The action of the spacer exiting the wellbore through large holes was simulated during the yard test. For sections where a significant distance exists between the upper perforations and the previous wellbore section a gel may be inserted above the upper perforations to assist with the flow diversion. Effectively, in the case of long horizontal sections, a significant distance may exist between the upper perforations and the previous casing section. In order to prevent spacer and fibers contaminating an excessive section of annulus a gel may be injected just above the upper perforations. The gel would develop high viscosity and would prevent spacer traveling too far past the upper perforations, this aiding the diversion of spacer and fibers into the larger hole sections. This step could be conducted at any time before spacer is injected. However in order to minimize the number of trips into the well this step would be included at the beginning of the job. In addition a gel may be injected above the sealing device and below the lower perforations. Examples of these gels include commercial products of the name OrganoSEAL or Protectozone. However any gel that develops high viscosity may be used.
Cement is pumped directly behind the spacer. The cement also contains fibers. In the yard test the fibers concentration in cement was 4 lb/bbl of CemNET, however any material that is used as plugging material may be used. The cement was designed with the same density as the spacer. In this test the cement was designed at 8.6 ppg. Once the cement exits the nozzle the cement bridges off against the fibers previously deposited by the spacer. The higher solids concentration of the cement increases the effectiveness of plugging the slots. Cement flow is directed axially along the slotted liner toward the lower perforations. The cement emerges in the annulus from the lower end and flows back along the outer annulus. Cement did not appear to be coming out of the slots above the lower zone and the cement did not appear to slump in the annulus. This was due to the similar density between the fluid ahead of the cement and the cement. Good cement coverage on the upper and lower annulus was observed. Another example realized with 8.3 ppg water ahead and 15.8 ppg cement and fibers show a significant slumping. This was due to the density difference between the cement and fluid ahead. This slumping was not noticed with the “neutral density” system used, where the spacer fluid and cement density were similar. In order to minimize the chance of stuck pipe, the spacer and cement should have the same density as the original fluid in the wellbore. This reduces the probability of stuck pipe due to differential hydrostatic pressure.
