Patent Application
20160305404
This application claims priority to European Application No. EP15164259.2, having a filing date of Apr. 20, 2015, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The following relates to a method to control the operation of a wind turbine.
Methods to control the operation of a wind turbine are well known. Some of the controls address the reduction of loads of wind turbine components, i.e. they address the reduction of loads, which are acting on the blades of the rotor of the wind turbine.
It is known to obtain a load reduction using a constant adjustment of the pitch angle. This adjustment is normally done in dependency of the electrical output power of the wind turbine, which is an indicator for the wind speed as well.
It is known to reduce loads, which are acting on wind turbine components, in a high wind situation by reducing the number of rotations per minute (abbreviated with “RPM”) and by decreasing the output power in dependency of the increasing wind speed.
It is even known to reduce the rotational speed of the blades and to reduce the output power of the wind turbine based on loads, which are estimated.
These controls are quite easy and work straight forward. They are mainly based on measurements of a single parameter like the wind speed—thus the controls are neither sophisticated nor adaptive to site-specific conditions of the wind turbine or to operation-specific conditions of the wind turbine.
The load reduction controls as known do not take into account an optimized annual energy production (AEP) as well as the control is activated or deactivated in a more mindless manner, taking only into account actual loads.
As aspect relates to providing a sophisticated, adaptive and improved method to control the operation of a wind turbine in view to loads.
The method invented controls the operation of a wind turbine. Wind-related values as well as these operating parameters of the wind turbine are measured: electrical output power, parameters of the rotating blade-system, and accelerations and thrusts, which are impacting on wind turbine components. The measured values are used to generate respective time-based statistics. The statistics are used to estimate at least one of these loads: tower bending moment, blade bending moment and/or tower yawing moment. The estimated loads are compared with load threshold values, which are pre-determined for the given type of the wind turbine. The operation of the wind turbine is controlled in a way that, taking into account the load estimations, respective loads are reduced.
Summarized the method invented addresses the operation of the wind turbine in respect to loads, which are experienced by the wind turbine, and in respect to the operating conditions of the wind turbine. The method invented controls the operation of the wind turbine in a way that the loads, acting on the wind turbine, are alleviated or at least reduced.
Described in more detail, the control method as invented is based on specific values of the wind turbine and its ambience, i.e.:
The specific values are used to generate one or more of the statistics given below, which are subsequently used for estimations:
These statistics could cover a time period of several seconds as well as longer periods of time (please note that the statistics do not aim for the whole lifetime of the wind turbine).
The statistics are used to estimate a number of loads (i.e. bending moments) or at least a sub-set of them, i.e.:
The resulting loads of the estimators are compared with respective limiting values, which are pre-determined for each given wind turbine type.
Depending on the configuration of the control method, all or a subset of the following control handles are used to alleviate the loads. The load alleviation is based on a predetermined strategy:
The load estimators can be controlled in a way that the targeted loads are addressed as individual target load, as a group of target loads or altogether.
The load estimators will preferably estimate n-second load statistics instead of load time series. The load estimates will be updated every n seconds, yielding to a minimum update period of n seconds.
Several of the listed loads are correlated thus the number of load estimators can be reduced. In a preferred configuration the respective inputs of the estimators are grouped thus a resulting number of four estimators are used to address these loads respectively:
A first estimator addresses these loads:
A second estimator addresses this load:
A third estimator addresses this load:
A fourth estimator addresses these loads:
The general structure of a respective load estimator is described by this formula:
{tilde over (L)}
i
=c
i,1
s
i,1
k
+c
i,2
s
i,2
k
+c
i,3
s
i,3
k
{tilde over (L)}i as load estimate corresponding to a load group i,
ci,1-ci,3 as load model coefficients of the load model i,
si,1-si,3 as input signals of the load model i, and
k as weighting factor, which can be either 1 or 2.
The model coefficients are found from aero-elastic simulations such that a highest possible correlation is achieved between the load estimate of each group and the loads within the group.
Thus, the four load estimators yield to generic measures of the load level within each load group and cannot be translated to a specific load. The loads estimates are qualitative indicators of the load levels.
The method invented can be configured to alleviate all or only a subset of the above listed main loads.
The method invented is based on estimations, which are in turn based on well known wind turbine parameters and wind measurements. Thus the method invented is reliable and does not need to measure loads by sensors, which are often subjected to interferences.
The method invented takes care for a load reduction, which can be done in dependency of a guaranteed annual energy production (AEP) as well.
The method invented is not only active in “high load situations” (like storm or high wind), it is even active during the normal operation of the wind turbine. The control is thus aiming for a trade-off between loads, live-time of the wind turbine (and its components as well) and optimized energy output.
The method invented aims for a wind turbine control, which is applicable to manage extreme loads (i.e. occurring around a rated wind speed or at high wind speeds) and which is as well applicable to manage fatigue loads in view to a planned lifetime of the wind turbine.
The method invented consists of a control functionality, which applies modifications to the operational state of the wind turbine, while the control functionality is based on a number of estimated loads.
The method invented adjusts the operational state of the wind turbine preferably, when the wind turbine operates in a high load or under harsh environmental conditions. Hence the effect on the annual energy production (AEP) is minimized.
The method invented is preferably based on online load and actual estimations. Thus the method reacts to load levels, which are higher than anticipated for a given site or for a given wind turbine design. Thus the overall safety against structural failure is increased.
The method invented even allows an efficient wind turbine control at sites with wind conditions, which are outside of design conditions.
The control-method as invented allows a less conservative wind turbine design because certain loads can be alleviated over the lifetime of the wind turbine.
Some of the embodiments will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein like designations denote like members, wherein:
A set of “input signals” are fed into a unit “preprocessing”.
The input signals might comprise measured values of the wind turbine and its ambience—i.e. the produced electrical power, the pitch angle of the rotating blades, the number of rotations (rpm) of the blades or the equivalent rotational speed of the blades, the characteristics of the wind (like the wind speed, turbulences, air temperature, air moisture, etc), accelerations experienced by the nacelle, and/or thrusts, which are experienced by respective components (i.e. the blades, the nacelle, the shaft, etc.) of the wind turbine.
The unit “preprocessing” uses so called pre-process parameters. By help of the parameters the “input signals” are filtered and averaged.
A set of “processed signals” are handed over to the unit “load estimator”, which is used to estimate respective loads as described above.
The unit load estimator is even supplied with so called “load est. parameters”. By help of the parameters the “processed signals” are weighted by coefficients.
A set of “load estimates” are handed over to the unit “ACS controller”, which control different capabilities or handles to alleviate the loads. The loads are alleviated by one or more of these possibilities (“control handles”):
The unit “ACS controller” is even supplied with so called “ACS parameters”. By help of the parameters the scheduling of the controller actions is done as described above.
Resulting controller actions, titled as “ACS actions” are handed over to respective units, i.e. an adjusted pitch angle value is handed over to the unit “opti-pitch interface” for further processing.
Accordingly respective curtailment commands are handed over to the unit “reduction Interface” for further processing and respective damper commands are handed over to the unit “tower side-side damper interface” for further processing.
The applied grouping of loads is justified through the correlation between the target loads.
The vertical axis of the plot shows values of a load estimation “LoadEsti”, while the horizontal axis shows time-values “Time”.
Three load estimations result in values, which are below a so called “Dead band”. These values are marked by so called “Decision points” 1, 2 and 3.
As the aligned estimation values of the “Decision points” 1, 2 and 3 are below the given “Dead band” the wind turbine controller continues with the operation of the wind turbine. In principle the wind turbine can be operated as close as possible to the wind to increase the power output of the wind turbine while staying below a given load threshold value.
Thus—as shown by the chronology of the “Decision points” 1 up to 3—the loads as estimated are increasing in a controlled manner.
If the load estimations are getting closer to the threshold value—as shown by the “Decision point” 4—the operation of the wind turbine is controlled in a way that the estimated loads stay below the given threshold value.
If the load estimations are stepping over the threshold value—as shown by the “Decision point” 5—in a rapid manner (thus with a quite high respective gradient) the control of the operation of the wind turbine is changed. The control now aims for a load reduction but in an accelerated manner to reach allowed loads as soon as possible.
The respective section in the figure
The accelerated load reduction can be done by performing one or more actions, i.e. limiting the pitch angle value, curtailing of the rotational speed, curtailing of the output power, etc., as described above.
If the load estimations are reaching the dead band again—as shown by “Decision point” 6, the accelerated load reduction actions can be reduced again in influencing the loads.
The operation of the wind turbine is now controlled in a way that the estimated loads stay within the given “Dead band” and thus below the “Threshold”, as indicated by the “Decision points 6 up to 9.
In principle the wind turbine can be operated as close as possible to the wind to increase the power output of the wind turbine while staying below the given load threshold value.
If the load estimations are stepping over the threshold value—as shown by the “Decision point” 10—but in a more slow manner (thus with a quite low respective gradient) the control of the operation of the wind turbine is changed again. The control now aims for a smooth load reduction to reduce the loads stepwise until the estimated loads are again reaching the “Dead band”. This is shown by the decision points 10 up to 12.
If the load estimations are leaving the “Dead band” while increasing their distance towards the “Threshold” as shown by the “Decisions points” 13 and 14, the load-based control could be stopped—the load is no longer deemed to endanger the wind turbine.
For the load estimations a corresponding operation scheduling strategy is applied.
As indicated above the operation scheduling strategy of a load estimator is defined as an applied step in using respective load handles when the load estimate exceeds the pre-defined threshold.
Thus the load estimator can trigger all, a subset or only a single control handle—i.e. for a load estimator the following operation scheduling strategy could be applied:
This strategy could shift the operation of the wind turbine to a more conservative opti-pitch curve and decrease the speed and power reference by 10%. The tower side-side damper is left unchanged if an escalation is requested. The above strategy could be associated with a load estimator that represents the tower forward-backward loads.
For tower bottom side-side loads a relevant strategy could be defined like this:
If the controller requests an accelerated action, the defined steps are multiplied with a predefined gain to decrease the load level in a fast manner.
The threshold as discussed above can be set for each load estimator respectively. The threshold is used as tuning parameters and will determine how aggressive an operation scheduling will be applied.
Although the present invention has been disclosed in the form of preferred embodiments and variations thereon, it will be understood that numerous additional modifications and variations could be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention.
For the sake of clarity, it is to be understood that the use of “a” or “an” throughout this application does not exclude a plurality, and “comprising” does not exclude other steps or elements.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15164259.2 | Apr 2015 | EP | regional |
