The present invention relates to a method of incrementally forming a workpiece.
In at least one embodiment a method of incrementally forming a workpiece is provided. The method includes incrementally forming a stiffening feature on the workpiece and incrementally forming a part on the workpiece within the stiffening feature.
In at least one embodiment a method of incrementally forming a workpiece is provided. The method includes incrementally forming a stiffening feature on the workpiece and incrementally forming a part on the workpiece outwardly from the stiffening feature.
In at least one embodiment a method of incrementally forming a workpiece is provided. The method includes incrementally forming a part on the workpiece with first and second forming tools disposed on opposite sides of the workpiece. A gap between the first and second forming tools may be decreased when at least a portion of the part is reformed with the first and second forming tools.
Detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale, some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. In addition, any or all features from one embodiment may be combined with any other embodiment. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for the claims and/or as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
Referring to
The system 10 may be used to incrementally form a workpiece. In incremental forming, a workpiece is formed into a desired configuration by a series of small incremental deformations. The small incremental deformations may be provided by moving one or more tools along and against one or more surfaces of the workpiece. Tool movement may occur along a predetermined or programmed path. In addition, a tool movement path may be adaptively programmed in real-time based on measured feedback, such as from a sensor like a load cell. Thus, incremental forming may occur in increments as at least one tool is moved and without removing material from the workpiece. More details of such a system 10 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/369,336, which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A brief summary of some components that may be provided with such a system 10 is provided below.
The system 10 may include a plurality of components that facilitate forming of the workpiece 12, such as a fixture assembly 20, a first manipulator 22, a second manipulator 24, and a controller 26.
The fixture assembly 20 may be provided to support the workpiece 12. The fixture assembly 20 may be configured as a frame that at least partially defines an opening 28. The workpiece 12 may be disposed in or at least partially cover the opening 28 when the workpiece 12 is received by the fixture assembly 20.
The fixture assembly 20 may include a plurality of clamps 30 that may be configured to engage and exert force on the workpiece 12. The clamps 30 may be provided along multiple sides of the opening 28 and may have any suitable configuration and associated actuation mechanism. For instance, the clamps 30 may be manually, pneumatically, hydraulically, or electrically actuated. Moreover, the clamps 30 may be configured to provide a fixed or adjustable amount of force upon the workpiece 12.
First and second positioning devices or manipulators 22, 24 may be provided to position first and second forming tools 32, 32′. The first and second manipulators 22, 24 may have multiple degrees of freedom, such as hexapod manipulators that may have at least six degrees of freedom. The manipulators 22, 24 may be configured to move an associated tool along a plurality of axes, such as axes extending in different orthogonal directions like X, Y and Z axes.
The first and second forming tools 32, 32′ may be received in first and second tool holders 34, 34′, respectively. The first and second tool holders 34, 34′ may be disposed on a spindle and may be configured to rotate about an associated axis of rotation in one or more embodiments.
The forming tools 32, 32′ may impart force to form the workpiece 12 without removing material. The forming tools 32, 32′ may have any suitable geometry, including, but not limited to flat, curved, spherical, or conical shape or combinations thereof.
One or more controllers 26 or control modules may be provided for controlling operation of the system 10. The controller 26 may be adapted to receive computer aided design (CAD) or coordinate data and provide computer numerical control (CNC) to form the workpiece 12 to design specifications. In addition, the controller 26 may monitor and control operation of a measurement system that may be provided to monitor dimensional characteristics of the workpiece 12 during the forming process.
An unsupported portion of a workpiece, such as a flat piece of sheet metal, may sag or deform under its own weight in a fixture assembly. Such sagging or deformation may cause significant deviations between the actual dimensional characteristics of an incrementally formed part and the desired or design-intent configuration. In addition, residual stresses in an incrementally formed workpiece can result in unintended deformation that may cause dimensional inaccuracies. Dimensional inaccuracies may accumulate as a workpiece is formed. Such accumulated stresses may cause a workpiece to buckle or split. Residual stresses may cause a workpiece to change shape when forming tools move away from the workpiece or when released from fixture assembly clamps.
To help address one or more of the issues described above, one or more methods of incremental forming as described below may be used to form a workpiece. The method may employ forming tools that are disposed on opposite sides of a workpiece.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The stiffening feature 50 may include one or more sides 54 that may be tapered or extend at an angle away from the reference plane 40. In addition, each side 54 may include one or more areas of curvature 56. The areas of curvature 56 may be formed along a tapered side 54 and may provide additional structural support or rigidity to the part forming area 52. The sides 54 may be tapered at a common angle relative to the reference plane 40. Moreover, opposing sides may have the same configuration.
The stiffening feature 50 may be partially or completely formed in a first direction 58 with respect to the fixture assembly 20 and/or the reference plane 40. The first direction 58 may extend along an axis that may be substantially perpendicular to the unformed workpiece 12 and/or reference plane 40. In addition, a majority of the stiffening feature 50 may be formed in a direction that coincides with a direction in which a majority of a part 60 is formed with respect to the fixture assembly 20 and/or the reference plane 40.
Referring to
The tool feed rate for incrementally forming the part 60 may be slower than that used to incrementally form the stiffening feature 50. A slower tool feed rate may yield better surface finish quality and improved dimensional accuracy than a higher tool feed rate leaving other factors constant. Accordingly, a higher tool feed rate may reduce forming cycle time yet provide adequate finish or dimensional characteristics in various circumstances, such as when a stiffening feature 50 is not integral with the part 60. In addition, other incremental forming parameters may be changed in addition to or separately from increasing the tool feed rate. For example, the forming step size and tool tip size may be increased to accelerate the forming process. Moreover, portions of the workpiece may be reformed to improve surface finish and or dimensional accuracy if desired.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The stiffening feature 50′ may be initially formed at a faster tool feed rate than that used to incrementally form the part 60′. After the part 60′ is formed, the stiffening feature 50′ may be reformed at a slower feed rate to provide a desired surface finish and better integrate the stiffening feature 50′ with the part 60′. The stiffening feature 50′ may be formed to a desired geometry without subsequent reforming in one or more embodiments.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3342051 | Leszak | Sep 1967 | A |
3875382 | Cutler | Apr 1975 | A |
4212188 | Pinson | Jul 1980 | A |
5103558 | Herrick et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5392663 | Charles | Feb 1995 | A |
6151938 | Park et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6216508 | Matsubara et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6532786 | Luttgeharm | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561002 | Okada et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6971256 | Okada et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
8322176 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010029768 | Okada et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040187545 | Okada et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187548 | Okada et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060272378 | Amino et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080302154 | Forrest et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090158805 | Callebaut et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1731238 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1899089 | Mar 2008 | EP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/369,336; filed Feb. 11, 2009; “System and Method for Incrementally Forming a Workpiece”, C. Johnson et al. |
“Dieless Incremental Sheet Metal Forming Technology,” Applied Plasticity Research Group, publication date unknown. |
“Dieless NC Forming,” www.the fabricator.com, by Taylan Altan, Jun. 12, 2003. |
“Dieless Sheet Forming,” Se-Prof Technology Services Ltd., printed Oct. 16, 2008, publication date unknown. |
“Octahedral Hexapod Design Promises Enhanced Machine Performance,” Ingersoll Milling Machine Company, printed Oct. 7, 2008, publication date unknown. |
“A Computer Numerically Controlled Dieless Incremental Forming of a Sheet Metal,” by S. Matsubara, University of Industrial Technology, Sagamihara-shi, Japan, May 25, 2001. |
“Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal,” by J. Cao, V. Reddy and Y. Wang, Northwestern University, publication date unknown. |
“Sheet Metal Dieless Forming and its tool path generation based on STL files,” by L. .Jie, M. Jianhua, and H. Shuhual; Springer London, Feb. 19, 2004. |
“A review of conventional and modern single-point sheet metal forming methods,” by E. Hagan and J. Jeswlet, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, Sep. 19, 2002. |
“Investigation into a new incremental forming process using an adjustable punch set for the manufacture of a double curved sheet metal,” by S. J. Yoon and D. Y. Yang; Korea Advanced Institute of Science of Technology; Taejon, Korea; Feb. 5, 2001. |
“Principle and applications of multi-point matched-die forming for sheet metal,” by M-Z Li-, Z-Y Cal, Z. Sui, and X-J Li, Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China, Jan. 9, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120024034 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |