The present invention concerns a method and device to increase the head rope life for single conveyance friction hoists for deep shafts.
A friction mine hoist, which may be of the double or of the single conveyance type, may be characterized by a pulley with friction liners, or similar, grooved to the diameter of the head ropes. The conveyances (skip or cage) for a double friction hoist are carried by the head rope(s) with the head ropes laid over the pulley with a contact angle of about 180 degrees. The rope ends are secured to the conveyances. The friction between the head rope(s) and the friction liners allows for a certain difference in rope tension of the two sides of the pulley without the occurrence of rope slip. Balance/Tail rope(s) are attached under the conveyances to limit reduce the difference in rope tension between the two sides of the pulley. Traditionally the mass per meter of the balance ropes has been dimensioned to be equal or nearly equal to the mass per meter of the head ropes. Thereby the safety margin before rope slip occurs is independent or nearly independent of the position in the shaft of the two conveyances.
A single friction hoist is based on the same principle as a double friction hoist, but with the difference that one of the conveyances is replaced by a counterweight. The mass of the counterweight is normally selected to be equal to the conveyance mass plus 50% of the net load. Thereby the difference in rope tension between the two sides of the pulley at empty conveyance and at normal net load will be the same. Friction mine hoists can be ground mounted with head sheaves in the head frame or tower mounted with or without deflection sheaves.
The static load variations in the head ropes occur as a result of loading the conveyance at the lower stop level and then hoisting it to the unloading (dumping) level at the upper end of the shaft whereby the balance rope(s) add mass to the ascending conveyance side, so adding rope tension in the head rope(s). The load variations can either be expressed as differences in tension (MPa or psi) or as load variations in percent of the breaking load of the head rope(s).
The life of the head ropes of a mine hoist of the friction hoist type depends on several factors such as:
Acceptable rope life is normally obtained for friction hoists in installations with hoisting distances up to 1400 to 1500 m by adopting applicable mine hoist regulations and good engineering practice.
At hoisting distances in excess of 1400 to 1500 m using friction hoists, the Static Load Range (SLR) increases to be the dominating factor determining the head rope life. Thereby, the SLR i.e. the maximum static load variation at the rope ends in percent of the rope breaking strength determines the limit for the practical/economical maximum hoisting distance for friction hoists. The SLR can be expressed by using the following equation:
SLR (%)=(Nl+(z2*q2*H))*g*100/(z1*B) where
Nl=Net load (kg)
z2=the number of balance ropes
q2=the mass per meter of the balance ropes (kg/m)
H=the hoisting distance (m)
g=9.81 (m/s2)
z1=the number of head ropes
B=the breaking strength for the head ropes (N)
The load variation caused by the mass of the balance ropes is dominating in friction hoists over large hoisting distances. The technical solution for reducing the static load variations for single conveyance friction hoists is to reduce the mass per meter of the balance ropes instead of the traditional practice to keep the mass equal or close to the mass per meter of the head ropes.
An embodiment of the present invention provides an improvement to considerably reduce the Static Load Range (SLR) while maintaining required margin before rope slip. Thereby the hoisting distance and/or the net loads can be significantly increased, and the lifetime for the head ropes can be significantly increased. Alternative solutions for single conveyance friction hoists are not known.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, byway of example only, with particular reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The following example illustrates the advantage of the solution of the invention:
Good engineering practice is to limit the SLR to at least 11.5% of the breaking strength of the head ropes. Taking this value as criteria for acceptable load variation illustrates the advantage of the solution:
Conveyance mass: Equal to the net load
Balance ropes are also known as tail ropes.
Head ropes and conveyance mass as above
The static rope tension acting on the head ropes, may for example be calculated at 4 critical points (A, B, C and D), and at four different times (t1, t2, t3, and t4) which depend on the position of the conveyance and if the conveyance is unloaded or loaded, according to the following equations:
Due to the large hoisting distance the mass of the upper and bottom part of the rope loops, as well as the rope mass between the points A and B, can be neglected.
Due to the large hoisting distance the mass of the upper and bottom part of the rope loops, as well as the rope mass between the points A and B, can be neglected.
Due to the large hoisting distance the mass of the upper and bottom part of the rope loops, as well as the rope mass between the points C and D, can be neglected.
Definitions as described above at t1 and t2.
Due to the large hoisting distance the mass of the upper and bottom part of the rope loops, as well as the rope mass between the points C and D, can be neglected.
According to the equations mentioned above the load tension variations in critical points (A, B, C and D) can be calculated according to the following equations:
Point A: (Sk+Nl+Lv2)*g−Sk*g=(Nl+Lv2)*g
Point B: (Mv+Lv1)*g−Sk*g=(Sk+0.5*Nl+Lv1−Sk)*g=(Lv1+0.5*Nl)*g
Point C: (Sk+Nl+Lv1)*g−Mv*g=(Sk+Nl+Lv1−Sk−0.5*Nl)*g=(Lv1+0.5*Nl)*g
Point D: (Mv+Lv2)*g−Mv*g=Lv2*g
Minimum rope tension variation appears when the variation in point
A is equal to variation in point B, thus
(Nl+Lv2)*g=(Lv1+0.5*Nl)*g=>Lv2=Lv1−0.5*Nl
this will give the following variations:
Point A: (Nl+Lv1−0.5*Nl)*g=(Lv1+0.5*Nl)*g
Point B: (Lv1+0.5*Nl)*g
Point C: (Lv1+0.5*Nl)*g
Point D: Lv2*g=(Lv1−0.5*Nl)*g
The optimum balance rope mass per meter is calculated with the following equation:
q2=(z1*q1*H−0.5*N1)/(z2*H)
where
q2 is the mass per meter of the balance rope (kg/m)
z1 is the number of head ropes
q1 is the mass per meter of the head rope (kg/m)
H is the hoisting distance (m)
z2 is the number of balance ropes
At optimum balance rope mass the SLR is reduced by the value defined by the following equation:
ΔSLR (%)=0.5*Nl*g*100/(z1*B)
It should be noted that while the above describes exemplifying embodiments of the invention, there are several variations and modifications which may be made to the disclosed solution without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of pending International patent application PCT/SE2006/050500 filed on Nov. 22, 2006 which designates the United States and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 (e) of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/739,494 filed on Nov. 25, 2005. All prior applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1132769 | Gale, Sr. | Mar 1915 | A |
1625083 | Hymans | Apr 1927 | A |
1837643 | Anderson | Dec 1931 | A |
3882968 | Suozzo | May 1975 | A |
5566783 | Yamashita | Oct 1996 | A |
5788018 | Mendelsohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6364063 | Aulanko et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
20030155185 | Nomura et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
677555 | Jun 1939 | DE |
692304 | Jun 1940 | DE |
1153141 | Aug 1963 | DE |
1161399 | Jan 1964 | DE |
1445229 | Aug 2004 | EP |
113081 | Feb 1918 | GB |
WO 2004094287 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lubomir Janovsky, Elevator Mechanical Design Principles and Concepts, 1987, Ellis Horwood Limited, p. 98-99. |
European Search Report Application No. EP 06 82 4569 Completed: Mar. 21, 2013; Mailing Date: Mar. 28, 2013 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080223664 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60739494 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/SE2006/050500 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12126696 | US |