Method to operate a grinder

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11014091
  • Patent Number
    11,014,091
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 11, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 25, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method to grind meat in grinder wherein the meat is provided to the grinder via a hopper (5) and transported by a feeder worm (2) to a rotating processing worm (3) which conveys the meat towards a cutting set (4) which grinds the meat and wherein the feeder worm (2) initially rotates in a first direction. In case the feeder worm (2) is overloaded, its direction of rotation is reversed to a second direction for a certain period of time and then reversed back to the first direction.
Description

The present invention relates to a method to grind meat in a grinder wherein the meat is provided to the grinder via a hopper and transported by a feeder worm to a rotating processing worm which conveys the meat towards a cutting set which grinds the meat and wherein the feeder worm initially rotates in a first direction.


Such grinders are known from the state of the art and are, for example, utilized to produce minced meat. Nowadays, in many cases, frozen food is ground, which in the past resulted in many shut downs, which reduces the profitability of a meat grinding plant.


It was therefore the objective of the present invention to provide a method which does not comprise the deficiencies of the state of the art.


This is attained by a method to grind meat in a grinder, wherein the meat is provided to the grinder via a hopper and transported by a feeder worm, to a rotating processing worm, which conveys the meat towards a cutting set which grinds the meat, wherein the feeder worm initially rotates in a first direction, characterized in that in case the feeder worm is overloaded, its direction of rotation is reversed to a second direction for a certain period of time and then reversed back to the first direction.


The present invention relates to a method to grind meat in a grinder. This grinder comprises a hopper which carries the meat to be grinded. At the base of the hopper a feeder worm is provided which rotates in a first direction around its middle axis. Additionally, a rotating processing worm is part of the grinder which conveys the meat towards a cutting sets, which cuts the meat in pieces so that the resulting product is minced meat. The cutting set comprises at least a perforated disk and a rotating knife which is in most cases driven by the processing worm. According to the present invention, in case an overload, the rotation of the feeder worm is reversed to a second opposite direction for a certain period of time and then reverse back to the first direction. Due to this change in direction of rotation, occurring blockages of the feeder worm can be loosened and no shut down of grinder is needed.


Preferably, during production under normal conditions, the feeder worm and the processing worm rotate in the same direction, each around their middle axis, respectively.


In case the direction of rotation of the feeder worm is reversed to a second direction of rotation, this rotation in the second direction only takes place preferably 0.5-3 revolutions and is then turned back to the initial first direction.


Preferably, the overload of the feeder worm is detected by the power-consumption of the motor that drives the feeder worm. In case this power-consumption exceeds a certain value, the direction of rotation is automatically reversed for a certain period of time and then reversed back to its initial direction of rotation.


According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the overload situation is detected by a sensor that detects the speed of rotation of the feeder worm. Typically, the grinder is set to maintain a certain speed of rotation of the feeder worm. In case, this speed of rotation cannot be maintained by the motor due to a blockage situation, the direction of rotation is automatically reversed for some revolutions and then turned back to its original direction of rotation. Alternatively or additionally, the torque needed to rotate the feeder worm is measured and in case this torque exceeds a certain value, the direction of rotation is automatically reversed for some revolutions and then turned back to its original direction of rotation.


According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the processing worm maintains its direction of rotation during the entire process, i.e. also during the rotation of the feeder worm in the second direction.


Preferably, before and after a change of direction of rotation of the feeder worm the speed of rotation of the feeder worm is at least essentially identical.


Preferably, the direction of rotation of the feeder worm is reversed manually or automatically.


Preferably, the grinder is automatically shut down when two overload situations occur in 3 to 8 minutes.





The invention is now explained according to the only FIG. 1.



FIG. 1 shows a grinder on which the inventive method can be executed. This grinder comprises a hopper 5, which accommodates the meat to be ground, e.g. blocks of frozen meat. At the bottom of the hopper 5 a feeder worm 2 is provided, which is driven by a motor and rotates during processing in a first direction around its longitudinal axis. Additionally, here below the feeder worm 2, a processing worm 3 is provided, which conveys the meat towards a cutting set 4, but which also comprises means to compress the meat. The cutting set comprises at least a perforated plate and a knife, which is driven by the processing worm and rotates relative to the perforated plate. Due to the cooperation of the perforated plate and the knife, minced meat is produced. During normal process conditions, the feeder worm and the processing worm rotate in the same direction of rotation.





In case of an overload situation, e.g. in case the power-consumption of the motor which drives the feeder worm in exceeds a certain level, the rotation of the feeder worm is stopped and reversed for a certain amount of revolutions, preferably 0.5-3 revolutions. Then the feeder worm is stopped again and reversed back to its initial direction of rotation. During this change of direction of rotation of the feeder worm the processing worm maintains its direction of rotation as well as its speed of rotation. After the reversed rotation of the feeder worm, the feeder worm rotates in the same direction and at the same speed as prior to the overload situation.


This reverse of direction of rotation can be initiated manually or automatically, by means of a sensor, which senses for example the power uptake and/or the speed of rotation of the feeders worm and/or torque needed to rotate the feeder worm. In case, an overload situations occurs twice in a certain period of time, which can be set by the operator, the grinder is automatically shut down in order to avoid damage of the grinder.


REFERENCE SIGNS




  • 1 Grinder


  • 2 feeder worm


  • 3 processing worm


  • 4 cutting set


  • 5 hopper


Claims
  • 1. A method to grind meat in a grinder, comprising: providing the meat to the grinder via a hopper;transporting the meat by a feeder worm that rotates in a first direction to a rotating processing worm, the processing worm conveys the meat towards a cutting set;grinding the meat with the cutting set;wherein the feeder worm initially rotates in the first direction, and if the feeder worm is overloaded, the feeder worm is reversed and rotates in a second direction for a certain period of time, the feeder worm is then reversed back and rotates in the first direction; andwherein the processing worm maintains its rotation in the first direction while the feeder worm rotates in the second direction.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein initially the feeder worm and the processing worm rotate in the same direction.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the feeder worm rotates between 0.5 and 3 revolutions in the second direction.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises detecting the overload of the feeder worm by a power-consumption of the feeder worm.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises detecting the overload of the feeder worm by a speed of rotation of the feeder worm.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises maintaining a speed of the processing worm during rotation of the feeder worm in the second direction.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises reversing back a rotation speed of the feeder worm to a same speed of rotation as an initial speed of rotation of the feeder worm.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises manually or automatically reversing the first direction of rotation of the feeder worm and/or the second direction of rotation of the feeder worm.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises automatically shutting down the grinder when two overload situations occur within 3-8 minutes.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises detecting the overload of the feeder worm by measuring torque required to rotate the feeder worm.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein an axis of rotation of the feeder worm is generally parallel to an axis of rotation of the processing worm.
  • 12. A method to grind meat in a grinder, comprising: providing the meat to a grinder via a hopper;transporting the meat by a feeder worm to a rotating processing worm, the processing worm conveys the meat towards a cutting set;grinding the meat with the cutting set;detecting an overload of the feeder worm; androtating the feeder worm in a first rotational direction, and if the overload of the feeder worm is detected, reversing the first rotational direction of the feeder worm to a second rotational direction for a certain period of time and then reversing the feeder worm back to the first rotational direction;maintaining a rotational speed of the processing worm during rotation of the feeder worm in the second rotational direction;maintaining a rotational direction of the processing worm while the feeder worm rotates in the second rotational direction;reversing back a rotational speed of the feeder worm to a same speed of rotation as an initial rotational speed of rotation of the feeder worm; andwherein initially, the feeder worm and the processing worm rotate in a common direction.
  • 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the method comprises manually or automatically reversing the first rotational direction of the feeder worm and/or the second rotational direction of the feeder worm.
  • 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein an axis of rotation of the feeder worm is generally parallel to an axis of rotation of the processing worm.
  • 15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the method comprises automatically shutting down the grinder when two overload situations occur within 3-8 minutes.
  • 16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the feeder worm rotates between 0.5 and 3 revolutions in the second direction.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the overload of the feeder worm is detected by a power-consumption of the feeder worm.
  • 18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the overload of the feeder worm is detected by a speed of rotation of the feeder worm.
  • 19. The method according to claim 16, wherein the overload of the feeder worm is detected by measuring torque required to rotate the feeder worm.
  • 20. A method to grind meat in a grinder; comprising: providing the meat to a grinder via a hopper;transporting the meat by a feeder worm to a rotating processing worm; the processing worm conveys the meat towards a cutting set;grinding the meat with the cutting set;rotating the feeder worm in a first rotational direction, if an overload of the feeder worm is detected, reversing the first rotational direction of the feeder worm to a second rotational direction for a certain period of time and then reversing the feeder worm back to the first rotational direction;automatically shutting down the grinder after the overload occurs twice within 3-8 minutes;maintaining a rotational speed of the processing worm during the second rotational direction of the feeder worm;maintaining a rotational direction of the processing worm while the feeder worm rotates in the second rotational direction;wherein initially, the feeder worm and the processing worm rotate in a common direction;wherein the feeder worm rotates between 0.5 and 3 revolutions in the second rotational direction;reversing back a rotational speed of the feeder worm to a same speed of rotation as an initial rotational speed of rotation of the feeder worm,manually or automatically reversing the first and/or second rotational direction of the feeder worm,wherein an axis of rotation of the feeder worm is generally parallel to an axis of rotation of the processing worm,wherein the overload of the feeder worm is detected with a sensor that detects a speed of rotation of the feeder worm, and if the speed of the rotation of the feeder worm is not maintained at a preset speed, the rotational direction of the feeder worm is automatically reversed.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
15176995 Jul 2015 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2016/066420 7/11/2016 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/009282 1/19/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
3310086 Lasar Mar 1967 A
3984056 Hartley Oct 1976 A
5230475 Gerner Jul 1993 A
6405662 Williams et al. Jun 2002 B1
7383842 Sabol Jun 2008 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
201179470 Jan 2009 CN
201179470 Jan 2009 CN
728318 Nov 1942 DE
2812536 Sep 1979 DE
9104544 Jun 1991 DE
202006001147 Jun 2006 DE
0573759 Jul 1997 EP
2268097 Jan 1994 GB
2000093925 Apr 2000 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2016/066420, dated Sep. 27, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2016/066420, dated Jun. 27, 2017.
Notice of opposition against the European Patent No. 16738407.2; dated Mar. 12, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180185852 A1 Jul 2018 US