Method to produce LNG at gas pressure letdown stations in natural gas transmission pipeline systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10852058
  • Patent Number
    10,852,058
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 4, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 1, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
There is described a method to produce LNG at gas pressure letdown stations. A high pressure gas stream is pre-cooled, dewatered, and then divided into two streams: a diverted LNG production stream (LNG stream) and a gas to end users stream (User stream). Carbon dioxide is removed from the LNG stream and the LNG stream is compressed. The LNG stream is then precooled by passing through one or more heat exchangers. Hydrocarbon condensate is removed from the LNG steam by passing the LNG stream through a first Knock Out drum. The LNG stream is then depressured by passing through a JT valve to depressurize the gas vapour exiting the first Knock Out drum and discharge it into a second Knock Out drum where the LNG is captured.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method that produces LNG at gas pressure letdown stations in natural gas transmission pipeline systems using the refrigeration generated from the expansion of the gas stream to distribution.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Canadian Patent 2,536,075 describes a process for producing Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) at Pressure letdown stations. There will hereinafter be described an alternative method of producing LNG at gas pressure letdown stations.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

There is described a method to produce LNG at gas pressure letdown stations. A first step involves pre-cooling a high pressure gas stream entering a gas pressure letdown station. A second step involves dewatering the high pressure natural gas stream after precooling. A third step involves splitting the dewatered high pressure natural gas stream into two streams: a diverted (LNG production) stream and a gas to end users stream. A fourth step involves removing carbon dioxide from the diverted (LNG production) stream. A fifth step involves compressing the diverted (LNG production) stream, which has been dewatered and had carbon dioxide removed. A sixth step involves precooling the diverted (LNG production) stream by passing the diverted (LNG production) stream through one or more heat exchangers downstream of the compressor. A seventh step involves removing hydrocarbon condensate from the diverted (LNG production) steam by passing the diverted (LNG production) stream through a first Knock Out drum so that the diverted (LNG production) stream exiting the first Knock Out drum is a gas vapour stream. An eighth step involves depressurizing the diverted (LNG production) stream by passing the diverted (LNG production) stream through a JT valve to depressurize the gas vapour exiting the first Knock Out drum and discharge it into a second Knock Out drum. A ninth step involves removing LNG from the diverted (LNG production) stream in the second Knock Out drum.


The disclosed invention provides a method for production of LNG at gas pressure letdown stations.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawing, the drawing is for the purpose of illustration only and is not intended to in any way limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiment or embodiments shown, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a method to produce LNG at gas pressure letdown stations in natural gas transmission pipeline systems.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A method to produce LNG at gas pressure letdown stations in natural gas transmission pipeline systems will now be described with reference to FIG. 1.


This alternative method of producing LNG at gas pressure letdown stations allows for LNG to be produced at a lower capital cost but at a higher operating cost than the method described in Canadian Patent 2,536,075.


Referring to FIG. 1, a typical gas pressure letdown station in a natural gas transmission pipeline. Natural gas is delivered through a high pressure transmission pipeline 1. Stream 2 is a gas stream that is first pre-heated in heater 3 before it is depressurized through JT valve 4 (typically down to 100 psi) and then routed to end users through line 6. A gas stream 5 provides the fuel required for heater 3. This simplified process arrangement as enclosed in the cloud constitutes a standard operation at gas pressure letdown stations. In the proposed invention, stream 7 is first pre-cooled in heat exchanger 8, the cooled stream 9 is then de-watered in pre-treatment unit 10. The dryed gas stream 12 is reduced in pressure at JT valve 13 at an approximate rate of 7 F for every 100 psi pressure drop. The dry, depressurized, cool, gas stream 14 is mixed with cryogenic vapors stream 35 and stream 39 to form a cooler mixture stream 15. The cold gas stream 15 is warmed in heat exchanger 16. The warmer stream 17 gains further heat through exchanger 18 and the now yet warmer stream 19 enters heat exchanger 8 for further heating. Stream 20 is now dry and at an equivalent temperature as stream 7. Nevertheless, stream 20 is further heated at exchanger 21 before being routed through stream 22 to end users stream 6.


The dry stream 11, the diverted stream is first pretreated in pre-treatment unit 23 to remove carbon dioxide. The dry, carbon dioxide free stream 24 is then compressed in compressor 25. The compressed stream 26 enters heat exchanger 21 where it is cooled. The compressed and cooled stream 27 is further cooled in heat exchanger 18. The compressed cooled stream 28 is yet further cooled in heat exchanger 16 and the colder compressed stream 29 enters knock out drum 30 to separate the condensed fraction. The vapour stream 31 is then depressurized through JT valve 32 and the two phase stream 33 enters knock out drum 34 to where a condensed LNG stream 36 is routed to storage and a cryogenic vapour stream 35 is routed and mixed with gas stream 14. The condensed fraction stream 37 is depressurized through JT valve 38 and the two phase stream 39 is mixed with streams 14 and 35 to form a mixture stream 15. The inventive step in this process is the generation and recovery of cold in conjunction with compression of a diverted gas stream to produce LNG using JT valves at gas pressure letdown stations. The use of compression and pressure reduction to generate the Joule Thompson effect is well understood and in practice in the gas industry in various forms. The advantage of the proposed invention is the process configuration which omits the use of gas expanders and replaces it with selective compression and JT valves, allowing for a lower capital cost LNG production at gas pressure letdown stations.


In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.


The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given a broad purposive interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.

Claims
  • 1. A method to produce LNG at gas pressure letdown stations, comprising: pre-cooling a pressurized natural gas stream entering a gas pressure letdown station;dewatering the pressurized natural gas stream after pre-cooling;splitting the dewatered pressurized natural gas stream into a diverted LNG production stream and a gas to end users stream;cooling the diverted LNG production stream to produce LNG by: depressurizing the gas to end users stream by passing the gas to end users stream through an end user JT valve, the gas to end users stream being unexpanded between the pressurized natural gas stream entering the gas pressure letdown station and the end user JT valve;warming the gas to end users stream by passing the gas to end users stream through a series of heat exchangers;removing carbon dioxide from the diverted LNG production stream;compressing the diverted LNG production stream, which has been dewatered and had carbon dioxide removed, in a compressor, the series of heat exchangers being directly downstream of the compressor;precooling the diverted LNG production stream by passing the diverted LNG production stream through the series of heat exchangers directly downstream of the compressor;removing hydrocarbon condensate from the diverted LNG production stream by passing the diverted LNG production stream through a first Knock Out drum so that the diverted LNG production stream exiting the first Knock Out drum is a first gas vapour stream;depressurizing the diverted LNG production stream by passing the diverted LNG production stream directly from the first Knock Out drum through a JT valve and discharging the first gas vapour stream into a second Knock Out drum; andremoving the produced LNG from the diverted LNG production stream in the second Knock Out drum;wherein cooling the diverted LNG production stream to produce LNG consists of using reduced temperatures generated by depressurizing the gas to end users stream and the diverted LNG production stream.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2798057 Dec 2012 CA national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/CA2013/050929 12/4/2013 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/085927 6/12/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (105)
Number Name Date Kind
2168438 Carrier Aug 1939 A
3002362 Morrison Oct 1961 A
3152194 Franz et al. Oct 1964 A
3184926 Blake May 1965 A
3241933 Ploum et al. Mar 1966 A
3280575 Drake Oct 1966 A
3315475 Harmens Apr 1967 A
3367122 Charles Feb 1968 A
3653220 Foster et al. Apr 1972 A
3735600 Dowdell et al. May 1973 A
3747359 Streich Jul 1973 A
3754405 Rosen Aug 1973 A
3792590 Lofredo et al. Feb 1974 A
3846993 Bates Nov 1974 A
3859811 Duncan Jan 1975 A
3892103 Antonelli Jul 1975 A
3919853 Rojey Nov 1975 A
3962881 Muska Jun 1976 A
4033735 Swenson Jul 1977 A
4170115 Ooka et al. Oct 1979 A
4279130 Finch et al. Jul 1981 A
4418530 Bodrov et al. Dec 1983 A
4424680 Rothchild Jan 1984 A
4430103 Gray et al. Feb 1984 A
4444577 Perez Apr 1984 A
4617039 Buck Oct 1986 A
4681612 O'Brien et al. Jul 1987 A
4710214 Sharma et al. Dec 1987 A
4751151 Healy et al. Jun 1988 A
4869740 Campbell et al. Sep 1989 A
4907405 Polizzotto Mar 1990 A
4936888 DeLong Jun 1990 A
5026952 Bauer Jun 1991 A
5062270 Haut et al. Nov 1991 A
5137558 Agrawal Aug 1992 A
5295350 Child et al. Mar 1994 A
5329774 Tanguay et al. Jul 1994 A
5425230 Shpak Jun 1995 A
5440894 Schaeffer et al. Aug 1995 A
5560212 Hansen Oct 1996 A
5678411 Matsumura et al. Oct 1997 A
5685170 Sorensen Nov 1997 A
5782958 Rojey et al. Jul 1998 A
5799505 Bonaquist et al. Sep 1998 A
5953935 Sorensen Sep 1999 A
5983663 Sterner Nov 1999 A
6089022 Zednik et al. Jul 2000 A
6089028 Bowen et al. Jul 2000 A
6131407 Wissolik Oct 2000 A
6138473 Boyer-Vidal Oct 2000 A
6182469 Campbell et al. Feb 2001 B1
6266968 Redlich Jul 2001 B1
6286315 Staehle Sep 2001 B1
6378330 Minta et al. Apr 2002 B1
6432565 Haines Aug 2002 B1
6517286 Latchem Feb 2003 B1
6526777 Campbell et al. Mar 2003 B1
6581409 Wilding et al. Jun 2003 B2
6606860 McFarland Aug 2003 B2
6640555 Cashin Nov 2003 B2
6662589 Roberts et al. Dec 2003 B1
6694774 Rashad Feb 2004 B1
6739140 Bishop et al. May 2004 B2
6751985 Kimble et al. Jun 2004 B2
6889523 Wilkenson et al. May 2005 B2
6932121 Shivers, III Aug 2005 B1
6945049 Madsen Sep 2005 B2
7051553 Mak et al. May 2006 B2
7107788 Patel et al. Sep 2006 B2
7155917 Baudat Jan 2007 B2
7219502 Nierenberg May 2007 B2
7257966 Lee et al. Aug 2007 B2
7377127 Mak May 2008 B2
8429932 Lourenco et al. May 2013 B2
8640494 Lourenco et al. Feb 2014 B2
8850849 Martinez et al. Oct 2014 B2
8887513 Kotzot et al. Nov 2014 B2
20020170297 Quine et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030008605 Hartford et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030019219 Viegas et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030051875 Wilson Mar 2003 A1
20030182947 Kimble et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196452 Wilding et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040065085 Madsen Apr 2004 A1
20050086974 Steinbach et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050244277 Hurst et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060213222 Whitesell Sep 2006 A1
20060213223 Wilding et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060242970 Yang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070062216 Mak et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070107465 Turner et al. May 2007 A1
20080016910 Brostow et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090084132 Dragomir Apr 2009 A1
20090113928 Vandor et al. May 2009 A1
20090249829 Lourenco et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090282865 Martinez et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100242499 Lourenco et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100287985 Martinez et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110036122 Betting et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110094263 Wilding Apr 2011 A1
20110174017 Victory et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120060554 Schmidt Mar 2012 A1
20120169049 Oxner et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130333416 Lourenco et al. Dec 2013 A1
20150143842 Lourenco et al. May 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (48)
Number Date Country
1 048 876 Feb 1979 CA
2 422 893 Feb 2002 CA
2 467 338 Jul 2003 CA
2 516 785 Sep 2004 CA
2 552 366 Jul 2005 CA
2 299 695 Jul 2007 CA
2 536 075 Jul 2007 CA
2 318 802 Feb 2008 CA
2 728 716 Jan 2011 CA
2 777 760 May 2011 CA
2 763 081 Dec 2011 CA
2 515 999 Dec 2012 CA
1615415 May 2005 CN
101948706 Jan 2011 CN
4416359 Oct 1998 DE
0482222 Apr 1992 EP
0566285 Oct 1993 EP
0 635 673 Jan 1995 EP
0 780 649 Jun 1997 EP
2 420 081 Oct 1979 FR
1011453 Dec 1965 GB
2 103 354 Feb 1983 GB
3-236589 Oct 1991 JP
5-263998 Oct 1993 JP
2002295799 Oct 2002 JP
2003-165707 Jun 2003 JP
2 180 420 Mar 2002 RU
2 232 342 Jul 2004 RU
9411626 May 1994 WO
9701069 Jan 1997 WO
9859205 Dec 1998 WO
9931447 Jun 1999 WO
0052403 Sep 2000 WO
03081038 Oct 2003 WO
03095913 Nov 2003 WO
03095914 Nov 2003 WO
2004010480 Jan 2004 WO
2004052511 Jun 2004 WO
2004109180 Dec 2004 WO
2004109206 Dec 2004 WO
2005045337 May 2005 WO
2006019900 Feb 2006 WO
2006036441 Apr 2006 WO
2006004723 Aug 2006 WO
2008006221 Jan 2008 WO
2009061777 May 2009 WO
2012015554 Feb 2012 WO
2014032179 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Hudson, H.M., et al., “Reducing Treating Requirements for Cryogenic NGL Recovery Plants,” Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Mar. 12, 2001, San Antonio, Texas, 15 pages.
Hidnay, A.J., and W.H. Parrish, “Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing,” Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, U.K., © 2006, 440 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2014, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/CA2014/050374, filed Apr. 14, 2014, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 1, 2012, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/CA2012/050030, filed Jan. 18, 2012, 9 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150345858 A1 Dec 2015 US