The present invention relates to a method to liquefy natural gas. The method was developed with straddle plants in mind, but has broader application.
Canadian Patent Application 2,763,081 (Lourenco et al) entitled “Method to Product Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) at Midstream Natural Gas Liquids (NGLs) Recover Plants” describes a process addition to straddle plants which are used to recover natural gas liquids (NGL's). The described process allows these plants, in addition to producing NGL's, to also efficiently produce liquid natural gas (LNG).
There will hereinafter be described an alternative to the method described in the 2,763,081 patent application. The method can be used wherever high pressure gas flows and supporting infrastructure exists to deal with the process streams, such as at straddle plants.
There is provided a method to produce Liquid Natural Gas (LNG). A first step involves passing a &watered natural gas stream at pressures of between 700 psig and 1200 psig through one or more heat exchangers to pre-cool the natural gas stream. A second step involves passing the pre-cooled natural gas stream through a gas column where natural gas liquid fractions and natural gas fractions are separated. A third step involves passing the natural gas fractions at pressures of between 700 psig and 1200 psig through a gas treatment unit to remove carbon dioxide gas. A fourth step involves passing the de-carbonized natural gas fractions at pressures of between 700 psig and 1200 psig through one or more heat exchangers to pre-cool the de-carbonized natural gas fractions. A fifth step involves passing the de-carbonized natural gas fractions at pressures of between 700 psig and 1200 psig through a gas expansion apparatus where pressure of the de-carbonized natural gas fractions is lowered to a pressure of less than 100 psig. A sixth step involves passing the de-carbonized natural gas fractions at a pressure of less than 100 psig through a separator where the de-carbonized natural gas fractions are separated into an LNG stream and a natural gas stream at a pressure of less than 100 psig.
Where there is a high pressure stream of natural gas (ie at pressures in a range of 700 psig to 1200 psig) that can be tapped, the above method can operate without external power inputs, resulting in substantial savings in both capital and operating costs.
The input temperature of a high pressure stream of natural gas is relatively constant. This means that once steady state is achieved, the ratio of cold gas vapour is constant relative to a flow rate of the natural gas. A high pressure LNG pump can be used to divert a reflux stream from the LNG stream to the gas column in order to maintain desired operating conditions.
These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to in any way limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiment or embodiments shown, wherein:
LNG is produced from a natural gas that has been cooled to a cryogenic condition to condense methane, the natural gas main component, A temperature of approximately −160 C is required to produce and keep natural gas in a liquid state at standard atmospheric pressure. Liquefaction reduces the volume of natural gas by approximately 600 times thus making it more economical to transport over great distances versus traditional pipelines. At present LNG is primarily transported across continents thus making it available throughout the world. LNG is also produced in small scale liquefaction plants to supply peak shaving demands, as well as to make available natural gas to regions that need it but where it is not economical or technically feasible to build pipelines.
The differences in liquefaction selection processes for large versus small LNG plants are; for large plants the main criteria is minimization of capital cost whereas the minimization of energy consumption is left as a second objective. These two objectives can also go together; thus an optimization of the efficiency of the plant may involve a reduction in the investment of the equipment. On the other hand, a higher efficiency can result in an increase in LNG production, so the efficiency factor has a significant impact on the plant economics. In small to medium LNG plants, it is not the efficiency, but other factors such as simplicity, modularization, ease of maintenance, operation and installation that have an higher criteria when selecting a liquefaction technology. The direct consequence of these different selection criteria is that liquefaction technologies for small to medium scale applications are not the same as the ones that are used in large LNG plants.
The two main groups of liquefaction technologies are the mixed refrigerant technologies and expansion based technologies. The mixed refrigerant technologies are “condensing type” processes, where the refrigerant used for the liquefaction makes use of its latent heat of vaporization to cool the natural gas. The expansion based technologies are processes where the refrigerant is always in gas phase and only makes use of its sensible heat to cool the natural gas.
The following mixed refrigerant technologies are the most representative processes in the industry: PRICO (Poly Refrigerated integrated Cycle Operation is licensed by Black and Veatch and it consists of one cycle of mixed refrigerant (a mixture of methane, ethane, propane, butane, nitrogen and sometimes isopentane), the advantages claimed by the licensor are operating flexibility, modular design and reduced refrigerant inventory. The AP-M (Air Products) is licensed by APCI, is a single mixed refrigerant that is vaporized at two different levels of pressure. The dual pressure cycle is more efficient than the single pressure cycle, resulting in smaller heat exchangers and compressor. The LiMuM (Linde Multistage Mixed Refrigerant) is licensed by Linde and consists of a spiral wound heat exchanger and one 3-stage single mixed refrigeration loop for the pre-cooling, liquefaction and sub-cooling of the natural gas. This process allows for high capacity throughput, PCMR (Pre-cooled Mixed Refrigerant) is licensed by Kryopak and consists of a pre-cooling stage (ammonia or propane cycle) followed by a single mixed refrigerant cycle, where the mixed refrigerant is a mixture of nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane and butanes, this process is used primarily in small plants, OSMR (Optimized Single Mixed Refrigerant) is licensed by LNG Limited, the process is a single mixed refrigerant process complemented with a standard package ammonia absorption process. The utilization of an ammonia process improves the efficiency of the process and an increase in LNG output compared to traditional single mixed refrigerant processes. In all of the above mixed refrigerant technologies, the main differences between them are the composition of the mixed refrigerant (although the refrigerants are the same ie; nitrogen, methane, ethane, etc . . . ), the metallurgy of the heat exchangers, the orientation of the equipment and the operations set points. In all the mixed refrigerants processes the objective of innovation is to increase efficiency, reducing capital and operating costs.
The expansion based technologies have various processes based on the use of nitrogen as a refrigerant to liquefy natural gas, the N2 expansion cycle. Some of these processes use a single cycle, others use a dual expansion cycle and in other cases a pre-cooling cycle is added to improve efficiency. Several licensors ie; APCI, Hamworthy, BHP Petroleum Pty, Mustang Engineering and Kanfa Oregon offer the N2 expansion cycles processes, they differ by proprietary process arrangement. In all these processes the cooling is provided by an external refrigeration plant using nitrogen expanders. The Niche LNG process is licensed by CB&I Lummus, consists of two cycles: one cycle uses methane as a refrigerant and the other uses nitrogen. The methane provides cooling at moderate and warm levels while the nitrogen cycle provides refrigeration at the lowest temperature level. The OCX process is licensed by Mustang Engineering and is based on the use of the inlet gas as a refrigerant in an open refrigerant cycle with turbo-expanders, there are variations such as OCX-R which adds a closed loop propane refrigerant to the OCX process and OCX-Angle which incorporates LPG recovery.
As demonstrated, presently there are many variations and processes to liquefy LNG. All of the processes operate based on the expansion of low boiling fluids be it through expanders or JT valves, be it closed or open cycle, the difference between them is in the process efficiencies which result in lower capital and operating costs per unit of LNG produced.
A straddle plant is a natural gas processing plant constructed near a transmission pipeline downstream from the fields where the natural gas in the pipeline has been produced. Also called an “on-line” plant. The straddle plant removes natural gas liquids, the C2+ gas fractions, from the transmission natural gas stream. This is done by first pre-treating the gas stream, pre-cooling it and then reducing the transmission gas high pressure stream in a range of 700 to 1200 psig, typically about 1000 psig, through a gas expander to pressures typically about 325 psig, to cool, condense and separate the C2+ gas fractions in a distillation column. The bottoms of the distillation column exit the plant as the recovered natural gas liquids (NGL's). The distillation column overhead stream, primarily C2− gas fractions, are pre-heated in a countercurrent heat exchange by the straddle plant pre-treated feed gas stream and re-compressed in two steps back to the same transmission pipeline gas pressure. The major operating cost of these straddle plants are the re-compression costs. The re-compression is typically done in two steps. The first step is done through a booster compressor, which typically is a direct drive compressor connected to the gas expander, the energy recovered by expanding the gas from the transmission gas pipeline high pressure is directly used to compress the distillation gas overhead stream from distillation column pressure to an intermediate gas pressure, typically from 450 to 550 psig. The main re-compressor then compresses this intermediate pressure to transmission pipeline pressure. The economics of a straddle plant are based on the quantities and revenues of natural gas liquids produced against the re-compression and maintenance costs.
Referring to
The above described process in
Referring to
The LNG stream 51 enters LNG pump 52 and is split into streams 53 and 54. LNG stream 53 is routed to storage. LNG stream 54 is routed to high pressure pump 55 where the pressure is increased to column 40 pressure, the LNG flowrate is added to control column overhead temperature, stream 43 and hence the concentration of methane to 85% or greater than 85% by mole. The cold gaseous stream 56 exits separator 50 and is routed to heat exchanger 46, the warmer gaseous stream 57 is further heated in heat exchanger 38, exiting it through stream 58 into cold box coil 59 where it is further heated before entering booster compressor 61 through line 60. Compressor 61 is powered by torque energy recovered in expander 48 through shaft B. The boosted pressure gaseous stream 62 mixes with stream 27 and the mixed stream 63 enters booster compressor 28 where the pressure is further boosted to stream 29. Compressor 28 is powered by torque energy recovered in expander 10 through shaft A. Stream 29 gas enters main compressor 30 where the pressure is increased to transmission pipeline pressure 36, exiting the compressor through stream 31 and straddle plant block valve 32.
The proposed invention addresses both large and small plants in which process simplicity and ease of operation are the main components. The invention eliminates the need for refrigeration cycle plants and the use of proprietary mixed refrigerants. By simplifying the process it reduces capital, maintenance and operations costs. In the preferred method, a pre-treated, pre-cooled high pressure natural gas stream is further cooled in a counter-current second heat exchanger with produced cold LNG vapor, treated, to a methane content specification, then de-carbonated, further cooled in a primary heat exchanger and then expanded through a gas expander. The gas expander produces torque and therefore shaft power that can be converted into mechanical compression power or electricity. In the preferred application the shaft power is used for compression. The expanded gas produces a gaseous and a liquid stream. The gaseous stream is routed to the transmission pipeline first by pre-heating it with inlet feed gas stream and then recompressed to the transmission gas pipeline. The liquid stream, LNG is split into two streams, LNG to storage and LNG for a column reflux. The LNG reflux stream is pressurized to column pressure to control the methane content of the LNG production stream. The bottoms of the column are then sent to the distillation column for the recovery of NGL's. The objective of the invention is to provide the ability for a straddle plant to improve its economics by generating LNG in addition to NGL's. In addition, the ratio of NGL's produced in this mode of operation to gas from the straddle plant to gas transmission pipeline is increased.
A main feature of this invention is the simplicity of the process which eliminates the conventional use of external refrigeration systems for LNG production. Another feature of the invention is the flexibility of the process to meet various operating conditions since the ratio of LNG production is proportional to the cold gaseous stream generated and returned to the transmission gas pipeline. The invention also provides for a significant savings in energy when compared to other LNG processes since the process produces its own refrigeration needs. The proposed invention can be used in any straddle plant size.
Variations:
It should be noted that the motive force generated by the expanders can be connected to a power generator to produce electricity versus a connected gas compressor as proposed.
Referring to
Referring to
In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given a broad purposive interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2813260 | Apr 2013 | CA | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2014/050347 | 4/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/169384 | 10/23/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2168438 | Carrier | Aug 1939 | A |
3002362 | Morrison | Oct 1961 | A |
3152194 | Pohl et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3184926 | Blake | May 1965 | A |
3241933 | Ploum et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3280575 | Drake | Oct 1966 | A |
3315475 | Harmens | Apr 1967 | A |
3367122 | Tutton | Feb 1968 | A |
3653220 | Foster et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3735600 | Dowdell et al. | May 1973 | A |
3747359 | Streich | Jul 1973 | A |
3754405 | Rosen | Aug 1973 | A |
3792590 | Lofredo et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3846993 | Bates | Nov 1974 | A |
3859811 | Duncan | Jan 1975 | A |
3892103 | Antonelli | Jul 1975 | A |
3919853 | Rojey | Nov 1975 | A |
3962881 | Muska | Jun 1976 | A |
4033735 | Swenson | Jul 1977 | A |
4170115 | Ooka et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4279130 | Finch et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4418530 | Bodrov et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4424680 | Rothchild | Jan 1984 | A |
4430103 | Gray et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4444577 | Perez | Apr 1984 | A |
4617039 | Buck | Oct 1986 | A |
4681612 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4710214 | Sharma et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4751151 | Healy et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4869740 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4907405 | Polizzotto | Mar 1990 | A |
4936888 | DeLong | Jun 1990 | A |
5026952 | Bauer | Jun 1991 | A |
5062270 | Haut et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5137558 | Agrawal | Aug 1992 | A |
5295350 | Child et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5329774 | Tanguay et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5425230 | Shpak | Jun 1995 | A |
5440894 | Schaeffer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5560212 | Hansen | Oct 1996 | A |
5678411 | Matsumura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685170 | Sorensen | Nov 1997 | A |
5782958 | Rojey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5799505 | Bonaquist et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5953935 | Sorensen | Sep 1999 | A |
5983663 | Sterner | Nov 1999 | A |
6089022 | Zednik et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089028 | Bowen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6131407 | Wissolik | Oct 2000 | A |
6138473 | Boyer-Vidal | Oct 2000 | A |
6182469 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6266968 | Redlich | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286315 | Staehle | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6378330 | Minta et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6432565 | Haines | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6517286 | Latchem | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526777 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6581409 | Wilding et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6606860 | McFarland | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640555 | Cashin | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662589 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6694774 | Rashad et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6739140 | Bishop et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6751985 | Kimble et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6889523 | Wilkenson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6932121 | Shivers, III | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6945049 | Madsen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7051553 | Mak et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7107788 | Patel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155917 | Baudat | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7219502 | Nierenberg | May 2007 | B2 |
7257966 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7377127 | Mak | May 2008 | B2 |
8429932 | Lourenco et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8640494 | Lourenco et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8850849 | Martinez et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8887513 | Kotzot et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020170297 | Quine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030008605 | Hartford, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019219 | Viegas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051875 | Wilson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030182947 | Kimble et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196452 | Wilding et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040065085 | Madsen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050086974 | Steinbach et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050244277 | Hurst, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060213222 | Whitesell | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060213223 | Wilding et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242970 | Yang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070062216 | Mak et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107465 | Turner et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080016910 | Brostow et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090113928 | Vandor et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090194460 | Klein Nagul Voort | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090194461 | Bras | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249829 | Lourenco et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282863 | Lourenco | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282865 | Martinez et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100242499 | Lourenco et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287985 | Martinez et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110036122 | Betting et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110067441 | Martinez | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094263 | Wilding et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110174017 | Victory et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120060554 | Schmidt | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120169049 | Oxner et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120255325 | Prim | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130333416 | Lourenco et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20150143842 | Lourenco et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1048876 | Feb 1979 | CA |
2 422 893 | Feb 2002 | CA |
2 467 338 | Jul 2003 | CA |
2 516 785 | Sep 2004 | CA |
2 552 366 | Jul 2005 | CA |
2 299 695 | Jul 2007 | CA |
2 536 075 | Jul 2007 | CA |
2 318 802 | Feb 2008 | CA |
2 728 716 | Jan 2011 | CA |
2 777 760 | May 2011 | CA |
2 763 081 | Dec 2011 | CA |
2 515 999 | Dec 2012 | CA |
1615415 | May 2005 | CN |
101948706 | Jan 2011 | CN |
44 16 359 | Oct 1998 | DE |
0 482 222 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 566 285 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0 635 673 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 780 649 | Jun 1997 | EP |
2 420 081 | Oct 1979 | FR |
1011453 | Dec 1965 | GB |
2 103 354 | Feb 1983 | GB |
3-236589 | Oct 1991 | JP |
5-263998 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2002-295799 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-165707 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2 180 420 | Mar 2002 | RU |
2 232 342 | Jul 2004 | RU |
9411626 | May 1994 | WO |
9701069 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9859205 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9931447 | Jun 1999 | WO |
0052403 | Sep 2000 | WO |
03081038 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03095913 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03095914 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004010480 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004052511 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004109180 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2004109206 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005045337 | May 2005 | WO |
2006004723 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006019900 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006036441 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2008006221 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009061777 | May 2009 | WO |
2012015554 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2014032179 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hudson, H.M., et al., “Reducing Treating Requirements for Cryogenic NGL Recovery Plants,” Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Mar. 12, 2001, San Antonio, Texas, 15 pages. |
Hidnay, A.J., and W.H. Parrish, “Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing,” Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, U.K., © 2006, 440 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2014, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/CA2014/050374, filed Apr. 14, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 1, 2012, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/CA2012/050030, filed Jan. 18, 2012, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160061519 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |