Patent Grant
8485635
Inkjet printing apparatuses can be used for single-color or multicolor printing of a printing substrate, for example a single sheet or a belt-shaped recording material made of the most varied materials (for example paper). The design of such inkjet printing apparatuses is known; see for example EP 0 788 882 B1. Inkjet printing apparatuses that operate according to the Drop on Demand (DoD) principle have a print head or multiple print heads with nozzles comprising ink channels, the activators of which nozzles (controlled by a printer controller) excite ink droplets in the direction of the printing substrate, which droplets are directed towards the printing substrate in order to apply print dots there for a print image. The activators can thermally (bubble jet) or piezoelectrically generate ink droplets.
Given an inkjet printing apparatus operating according to the DoD principle, the ink that is used is adapted in terms of its physical/chemical composition to the print head; for example, the ink is adapted in terms of its viscosity. Given low print utilization, not all nozzles of the print head are activated in the printing process; and thus many nozzles are subject to downtimes (print pauses), with the consequence that the ink in the ink channel of these nozzles is not moved. Due to the effect of the evaporation out of the nozzle opening, the danger exists that the viscosity of the ink then varies. This has the consequence that the ink in the ink channel can no longer move optimally and escape from the nozzle. In extreme cases the ink in the ink channel dries completely and clogs the ink channel, such that a printing with this nozzle is no longer possible.
The drying of the ink in the nozzles can be prevented in that a printing from all nozzles takes place within a predetermined cycle. This cycle can be set corresponding to the print utilization. Individual points in the unprinted regions of the printing substrate can thereby be applied, or print dot lines can be printed between print pages. These methods can lead to disruptions in the print image.
Furthermore, the ink volume in the ink channel can be mixed via oscillation in order to achieve a uniform viscosity in the ink channel. This method fails given longer downtimes of the nozzles since only a limited ink volume is provided in the channel.
An inkjet printing apparatus in which ink fog occurring during printing is suctioned away between print head and printing substrate is described in JP 60184851 A. The suction device is arranged so that a suction flow arises between printing substrate and print head, which suction flow is directed perpendicular to the path or flight directions of the ink droplets and carries along the ink fog. The ink fog is suctioned into a suction chamber in which is arranged a filter that filters the ink from the air flow.
From US 2008/0143781 A1 it is known to intermittently activate a cleaning operation in which the nozzles of the print head eject ink droplets. For this the print head is panned from the printing position into a cleaning position, in which cleaning position the emitted ink droplets cannot arrive at the printing substrate but rather arrive in a capture container. The ink fog occurring in the cleaning operation is drawn off with the aid of a suction device. The print head is subsequently panned back into the printing position again.
A printing device with ink fog suction is known from EP 1 923 216 A2. In particular in the cleaning operation—in what is known as a free spray mode—the nozzles of the print head emit ink droplets that are suctioned away with a suction device. The ink fog arising in the cleaning operation is thereby likewise drawn off as well so that no contamination of the printing apparatus can arise. The suction device can also generate such a suction flow at the print head that no contamination of the printing apparatus can arise in the print operation. The suction device can also generate such a suction flow at the print head that, in the print operation, the ink droplets used for printing are barely deflected by the suction flow; in contrast to this, the ink droplets of smaller diameter that form the ink fog are deflected into a suction intake.
It is an object to specify a method to operate an inkjet printing apparatus operating according to the Drop on Demand principle, in which method the disadvantages illustrated above are substantially avoided (thus a viscosity change of the ink in the nozzles during a printing pause is prevented for these nozzles).
In a method to regenerate during operation ink in nozzles of at least one inkjet print head operating according to drop on demand in an inkjet print apparatus, nozzles of the print head that generate print dots on a printing substrate are activated such that the nozzles output first ink droplets of a predetermined volume in a direction towards the printing substrate. Nozzles that are not being currently used to generate print dots on the printing substrate are activated such that they output at least one second ink droplet of a smaller volume in comparison to the first ink droplets volume. During at least the outputting of the second ink droplet, a suction flow is generated between the inkjet print head and the printing substrate of such strength that the second ink droplet is deflected so it does not arrive at the printing substrate.
For purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to a preferred embodiment/best mode illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, and such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated embodiment and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates are included.
In a method according to the preferred embodiment, a change of the properties of the ink (for example its viscosity) in the nozzles is prevented since the ink in the nozzles is continuously refreshed. For this the nozzles are activated differently during the printing operation in which a printing substrate is printed, depending on whether a nozzle should generate a print dot on the printing substrate or not. Nozzles that should generate a print dot on a printing substrate are activated so they output ink droplets of a predetermined volume (called first ink droplets in the following explanation) in the direction of the printing substrate. However, in contrast to this nozzles that are not used to generate a print dot on the printing substrate during the running print operation—thus for which a print pause (=downtime) is present—are activated such that during their print pauses they output ink droplets of smaller volume (called second ink droplets in the following explanation) in comparison with the first ink droplets at predetermined time intervals. Between the inkjet print head and the printing substrate a suction flow of such a strength is directed so that only the second ink droplets are deflected and so that these do not arrive at the printing substrate. In contrast to this, due to their larger volume the first ink droplets are not affected by the suction flow so that the print image on the printing substrate is disrupted. The suction flow can be generated by suction of air; it can thus be an air flow. It is advantageous if a continuous and laminar suction flow is directed past the inkjet print head.
The method according to the preferred embodiment therefore has the following advantages.
A complete ink exchange takes place in the nozzles used for the printing. The ink, whose properties could change due to the downtime, is ejected promptly and drawn off and replaced by new ink with the predetermined properties.
During the regeneration of the ink in the nozzles, the ejected ink does not arrive at the printing substrate and does not cause any print image disruptions.
A continuous regeneration of the ink in the nozzles is provided during the print operation. For this, second ink droplets of smaller volume are generated by the unused nozzles while, at the same time, the nozzles with which print dots should be printed on the printing substrate generate first ink droplets with a greater volume that remain largely unaffected by the suction flow. The process of regeneration runs without performance loss in the printing operation. The printing apparatus must neither operate more slowly nor be stopped. In addition to this, no maculature is created since the second ink droplets do not arrive at the printing substrate. This is in particular important in continuous printing apparatuses (continuous feed printing apparatuses) since here the printing substrate is always located under the print head.
The ink that is drawn away in the regeneration can be separated from the air flow and be supplied again to an ink tank that supplies the nozzles with ink; and the ink consumption is therefore reduced.
The preferred embodiment is explained further using the exemplary embodiment shown in the drawing Figures.
In order to prevent the second ink droplets from striking the printing substrate 2, a suction device is arranged adjacent to the print head 1, which suction device generates a laminar suction flow 5 between print head 1 and printing substrate 2 that can be continuously maintained. The suction device can have a pump 8 arranged in conduits 6, 7, an overpressure chamber 9 and a suction chamber 10 with a filter 11. The suction chamber 10 can be connected via the conduit 6 with the pump 8 while the overpressure chamber 9 is connected via the conduit 7 with the pump 8. A loop for the suction flow 5 generated by the pump 8 is therefore created. The ink filtered out by the filter 11 can be fed to an ink tank 12 and is then provided for the printing operation again.
The overpressure chamber 9 and the suction chamber 10 are arranged relative to the print head 1 such that the suction flow 5 runs perpendicular to the path of the ink droplets. If the direction of the suction flow 5 coincides with the transport direction of the printing substrate 2, in
In the method according to the preferred embodiment the deflection of the ink droplets depending on their volume V or, mass m (due to a continuous, laminar suction flow 5 perpendicular to the droplet flight path 4) is thus utilized in order to draw off ink droplets of lower volume (mass). During the actual printing process a complete regeneration or renewal of the ink in the nozzles via the targeted and defined excitation of ink droplets of low mass is achieved without print image interference on the printing substrate 2. Due to the regeneration the ink in the nozzles maintains constant properties, for example with regard to its viscosity.
In addition to this, the continuous and laminar suction flow 5 in the transport direction of the printing substrate 2 is generated between the print head 1 and the printing substrate 2 using the suction device. Here the air flow Qpap of the printing substrate 2 running in the same direction is added to the suction flow Qabs to form Σ(Qabs+Qpap). Differentiation is thereby made between two processes running in parallel in the printing operation, the printing process and the regeneration process:
During the printing process the print image is only generated as of a specific limit drop volume VLimit of the ink droplets. This means that although the ink droplets whose droplet volume VI is greater than the limit volume VLimit are slightly deflected by the suction flow 5, they arrive at the printing substrate 2 due to their mass m1 (m1>mLimit).
In contrast to this, the ink droplets that have a volume V2 below the limit volume VLimit are completely deflected by the suction current 5 due to their lower mass m2 (m2<mLimit) and then drawn off (regeneration process).
The limit value VLimit as of which the ink droplet suction occurs can be adjusted via the strength of the suction flow 5 and can thus be adjusted corresponding to the predetermined limit volume VLimit of the print head 1 that is used. The droplet volume of the ink provides the activator (piezoelectrical or thermal) of the print head 1 with its operating voltage. Whether a printing process or a regeneration process should be activated can thus be precisely controlled via the operating voltage. The limit value VLimit is dependent on the print head 1 that is used and is oriented on the volume V of the ink droplet that generates the smallest print image.
The method according to the preferred embodiment is thus a method in which defined ink droplets below a limit value VLimit are deliberately generated during the print operation. Corresponding to the print utilization per nozzle, the ink regeneration in the nozzles can be adjusted in continuous print operation without performance loss. If the print utilization falls below a measure to be defined, the continuous regeneration of the ink in the nozzles ensures a basic utilization. Given this basic utilization the continuous regeneration is implemented at each nozzle insofar as it is not active for the print image generation at this point in time. In this case the print image generation prevails, meaning that the regeneration at this nozzle is interrupted. The regeneration can arise via a frequency via a frequency per nozzle as a regeneration parameter. The regeneration of a nozzle begins after (for example) a predetermined dead time of the respective nozzle after its last print usage.
A print head 1 has been used in
Although a preferred exemplary embodiment is shown and described in detail in the drawings and in the preceding specification, it should be viewed as purely exemplary and not as limiting the invention. It is noted that only a preferred exemplary embodiment is shown and described, and all variations and modifications that presently or in the future lie within the protective scope of the invention should be protected.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2010 036 839 | Aug 2010 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6863385 | Jeanmarie et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 20020005874 | Imai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20080111851 | Muhl | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080143781 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0788882 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1923216 | May 2008 | EP |
| 60-184851 | Sep 1985 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120033016 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
