This disclosure relates generally to vehicle hitches and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for a load-sensing hitch utilizing a system of strain gauges.
In recent years, consumer vehicles capable of pulling trailers have implemented additional data processing capabilities. With these capabilities, vehicles can process parameters of a vehicle and/or trailer not previously processed to provide additional insights to a user of the vehicle. For example, an additional parameter of the vehicle that can be processed is the load condition experienced at a hitch. The load condition includes various characteristics (e.g., tongue load, sway force, acceleration force, braking force, etc.) experienced by the hitch.
Different vehicle models often have different configurations, including spare tire placement, fuel tank placement, floorboard height, frame rail spacing, etc. As a result, the hitch design may vary significantly between model types. Regardless of the specific model of a vehicle, vehicle hitches generally include a receiver tube and a crossbar. The receiver tube of a hitch is used to couple a towing element (e.g., a hitch ball, a drawbar, etc.) to the vehicle and often has a square cross-section. A crossbar is a tube connecting the driver and passenger sides of a vehicle frame or a vehicle body structure to the receiver tube.
Methods and apparatus for a load-sensing hitch utilizing a system of strain gauges are disclosed. An example apparatus includes a receiver tube, a side member, a crossbar coupled to the receiver tube and the side member, the crossbar including a support including a first end, a second end and a mid-portion located between the first end and the second end, the mid-portion having a cross-sectional area smaller than the cross-sectional area of the first end or the cross-sectional area of the second end and a strain gauge disposed within the mid-portion.
An example vehicle disclosed herein includes a frame, and a hitch including a receiver tube, a side member coupled to the frame, a crossbar coupled to the receiver tube and the side member, the cross including a support including a first end, a second end and a mid-portion located between the first end and the second end, the mid-portion having a cross-sectional area smaller than the cross-sectional area of the first end or the cross-sectional area of the second end and a strain gauge disposed within the mid-portion.
An example apparatus disclosed herein includes memory and a processor to execute instructions to receive load data associated with a hitch of a vehicle from a strain gauge, the strain gauge positioned at a mid-portion of a support, the support disposed on a crossbar of the hitch, determine a load condition of the hitch based on the load data, and generate an alert for present via a user interface when the load condition satisfies an alert threshold.
The figures are not to scale. Instead, the thickness of the layers or regions may be enlarged in the drawings. In general, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawing(s) and accompanying written description to refer to the same or like parts.
The maximum weight a given vehicle can tow (e.g., towing capacity) is determined by the vehicle manufacturer and takes into consideration several ratings, including a vehicle weight rating (e.g., maximum loaded weight of a vehicle and/or a trailer), a combined vehicle rating (e.g., maximum weight of vehicle with a fully loaded trailer attachment), and an axle weight rating (e.g., maximum weight that can be placed on front/rear axles), as well as a tongue weight (e.g., downward force exerted on the back of the tow vehicle). In addition to structural capacity, the vehicle tow rating can also be determined by powertrain capacity and brake sizing. A vehicle hitch can be attached to a vehicle chassis (e.g., load-bearing framework) for purposes of towing. However, many vehicle hitch designs are specific to individual vehicle models and, thus, can require the hitch to have unique shapes and parts specific to each vehicle model. Variations in hitch design between vehicle models can be attributed to the shape of the rear bumper housing, packaging requirements for the spare tire, floorboard height, frame rail spacing, etc. These variations in hitch design can make it difficult to package force-sensing elements (e.g., pins, strain gauges, etc.) into a hitch. For example, each hitch design can require specifically designed force-sensing elements, which can increase manufacturing cost and reduce availability of replacement parts. Additionally, in some known examples, hitches including force sensing elements require significant packaging area that can negatively affect vehicle length, vehicle departure angle and spare tire placement. Accordingly, packaging force sensing elements about the receiver tube of a hitch may not be possible for some vehicle configurations.
Examples disclosed herein describe methods and apparatus for a load-sensing hitch utilizing a system of strain gauges that can be implemented on a variety of vehicles due to the system of strain gauges allowing easier coupling to the vehicle compared to other technologies. In the examples disclosed herein, the system of strain gauges refers to a number of strain gauges that cooperate operatively to determine one or more force(s) on the hitch. More specifically, in the examples disclosed herein, the load sensing trailer hitch utilizes a system of strain gauges located on four load path attachment members. The trailer hitch requires no moving or sliding interfaces and can be modified to accommodate a variety of different structures. For example, the trailer hitch can be used to sense the force being applied through a receiver tube of a trailer hitch system and/or estimate tongue weight of a trailer in addition to lateral and brake/acceleration loads to promote proper utilization of trailer hitch systems. In the examples disclosed herein, at least two structural attachment points can constrain the receiver tube to properly mitigate differing moment arms caused by the geometric differences between custom drawbars. In the examples disclosed herein, forces (e.g., forces applied on a hitch ball) can be calculated using a minimum number of strain gauge readings to interpret the load fully (e.g., using response surface modeling), without the need for free body diagram-based solutions or mitigation of geometric differences in the hitch.
In the examples disclosed herein, the hitch system components can have a symmetric structural design that houses sensors (e.g., strain gauges) outboard in a main frame rail of the vehicle, such that a method disclosed herein can be used to determine a unique load case that causes both constructive and destructive strain gain at each sensor. For example, strain gauges are attached to the hitch system structural members to allow for a linear deformation within the expected loading range of the vehicle. In some examples, hitch system structural members can be aligned with each other parallel to the center line of the vehicle, with some member(s) disposed towards the rear of the vehicle and other member(s) disposed towards the front of the vehicle. In some examples, a total of 16 locations are available for strain gauge attachments, and optimization algorithms may be used to determine the number and position of strain gauges required to estimate force components and position coordinates of a specific type of load or loading condition. To differentiate the portion of strain gauge signal that can be attributed to the number of sensors used, a system of strain gauges is used to build a response surface and solve for the unique load case that creates strain in the sensors. For example, output of data using a system of strain gauges can be used to calculate force components, force locations, system error over a range of force magnitude and locations, as well as optimal number and location of strain gauges to include in the system. Furthermore, in the examples disclosed herein, the hitch can include a set of strain gauges that creates a system that is statically indeterminate. The methods and apparatus disclosed herein permit assessment of the statically indeterminate system such that measurement of vertical, horizontal, and lateral force loads imparted on a towing vehicle can be performed (e.g., to determine too much or too little tongue weight, ensure proper operation of the towing vehicle, etc.) while also minimizing the total number of sensors (e.g., strain gauge(s)) to be used in order to reduce the hitch system cost and complexity.
In the illustrated example of
The load manager 102 receives load information (e.g., forces, torques, etc.) from hitch sensors (e.g., strain gauges 204). In some examples, the load manager 102 can analyze the received load information to determine a load condition of the vehicle 100 and/or the hitch 101. For example, the load manager 102 can determine a vertical load condition (e.g., a load condition in a direction orthogonal to the ground), a horizontal load condition (e.g., a load condition in a direction parallel to the receiver tube 104, etc.) and/or a lateral load condition (e.g., a load condition in a direction parallel to the crossbar 106, etc.). In some examples, if the load condition satisfies an alert threshold, the load manager 102 can generate an alert to indicate to a user of the vehicle 100 that the vehicle 100 is improperly loaded. The load manager 102 can be communicatively coupled to the example display 103.
The display 103 can be, in some examples, within an interior of the vehicle 100 (e.g., a dashboard display, an overhead display, etc.). Additionally or alternatively, the display 103 can be included in a mobile device (e.g., a smartphone, a tablet, a smartwatch, etc.) of an operator or a passenger of the vehicle 100. In some examples, the display 103 can display the load condition determined by the load manager 102. In some examples, the display 103 can present an alert to a user of the vehicle 100 when a load condition satisfies an alert threshold.
The receiver tube 104 can be used to couple a towing element (e.g., a hitch ball, a drawbar, etc.) to the vehicle 100 and can have a square cross-section. Load applied at the receiver tube 104 to the vehicle 100 can be transferred by a crossbar (e.g., the crossbar 106). The crossbar 106 can, in some examples, include a quadrilateral cross-section. In other examples, the crossbar 106 can have any other suitable cross-section (e.g., polygonal, circular, ovoid, etc.). In the illustrated example, the example crossbar 106 is a single continuous tube. In other examples, the crossbar 106 can be two tubes bisected by the receiver tube 104.
The chain bracket 108 acts as redundant attachment point between the hitch 101 and a coupled trailer. For example, one or more chains or similar mechanical elements can be coupled to the hitch 101 and the chain bracket 108. In operation, if the primary coupling between the trailer and the hitch 101 decouples (e.g., the coupling via the receiver tube 104, etc.), the chain(s) prevent the trailer from becoming detached from the hitch 101.
The first side member 110A and the second side member 110B are attached to either side of the crossbar 106 and can be used to couple the support structure(s) 114 to the first frame attachment member 112A and/or the second frame attachment member 112B, respectively, as part of an overall coupling of the hitch 101 to the vehicle 100. In some examples, the side member(s) 110A, 110B are coupled to the crossbar 106 via welds. However, the side member(s) 110A, 110B can be coupled to the crossbar 106 via any other suitable means (e.g., welded, riveted, press-fit, etc.). While one example implementation of the side member(s) 110A, 110B is illustrated in
The first frame attachment member 112A and/or the second frame attachment member 112B can be used to couple the hitch 101 to the vehicle 100 to allow for load sensing when load from the crossbar 106 (e.g., from a coupled trailer, from any other load on the towing attachment area, etc.) is transferred to the vehicle frame. In the example of
The support structure(s) 114 can be positioned between the side member(s) 110A, 110B and the frame attachment member(s) 112A, 112B. In the example of
The side member(s) 110A, 110B, the frame attachment member(s) 112A, 112B, and/or the support structure(s) 114 can be composed of any suitable material or combination thereof (e.g., aluminum, cast iron, steel, plastic, etc.). In some examples, the side member(s) 110A, 110B, the frame attachment member(s) 112A, 112B, and/or the support structure(s) 114 are manufactured via stamping. In other examples, the side member(s) 110A, 110B, the frame attachment member(s) 112A, 112B, and/or the support structure(s) 114 can be manufactured via any suitable manufacture or combination thereof (e.g., weldment casting, extrusion, etc.).
In the illustrated example of
The example sensor interface 120 receives data from the support structure-based strain gauge(s) and/or any other components of the vehicle 100 and/or hitch 101. In some examples, the sensor interface 120 can convert the data received from the components into a numerical form (e.g., human readable, etc.). For example, if a load-sensing sensor outputs an analog signal (e.g., an analog voltage, an analog current, etc.) the sensor interface 120 can convert the received data into values corresponding to the loads detected by the hitch 101.
The example load determiner 122 analyzes the received load signal(s) from the sensor interface 120 to determine the vertical load condition of the vehicle 100, the horizontal load condition of the vehicle 100 and/or the lateral load condition of the vehicle 100. For example, the load determiner 122 can use static equilibrium analysis (e.g., force balancing, moment balancing, etc.) and/or an algorithm to solve for a statically indeterminate system (e.g., a system for which static equilibrium equations, including force and moment equilibrium conditions, are insufficient to determine the internal forces and reactions on the given structure), as described in connection with
The example vehicle interface 124 generates a notification to be presented to a user of the vehicle 100. For example, the vehicle interface 124 can generate an alert if the load determiner 122 determines that an alert threshold is satisfied. In some examples, the vehicle interface 124 can generate a visual alert to be presented to the user via the display 103. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle interface 124 can generate an auditory alert to be presented to the user (e.g., the alert may be presented over speakers of the vehicle 100, a mobile device of the user, etc.). In some examples, the vehicle interface 124 can generate instructions indicating to the user how to correct the load condition. In some examples, the vehicle interface 124 can enable the load manager 102 to receive data from the vehicle 100. For example, the vehicle interface 124 can receive the drawbar dimensions from the vehicle 100 (e.g., input by a user into the interface of the vehicle 100, etc.). In some examples, the vehicle interface 124 can receive data from additional sensors associated with the vehicle 100 (e.g., accelerometers, ride height sensors, etc.). In such examples, the load determiner 122 can further base the load condition on data from any other sensors of the vehicle 100. For example, powertrain torque sensors can be used to estimate an overall trailer mass when coupled with an acceleration load at the hitch 101 of
While an example manner of implementing the load manager 102 of
ΣFz=0=−Rz1+Rz2−Ftz (1)
In the example of
In some examples, optimization, iteration and analysis of designs using parameter-based studies can be performed (e.g., using the modeFRONTIER platform, simulation software such as ANSYS, etc.) to determine the total number and/or position of strain gauges to be used as part of the hitch system. In some examples, data mapping tools (e.g., a response surface model) can be used to interpret results from randomly varying magnitudes, directions, and/or locations of a force input while recording sensor (e.g., the strain gauge(s) 204) output from 16 possible strain gauge positions on support structure(s) 114). Load cases that are uniformly distributed across input ranges can be run to maximize the total number of inputs (e.g., 2,000 load cases). In some examples, the inputs can include varied force vector components (e.g., ±10,000 Newtons for Fx, Fy, and/or Fz) and varied force coordinates (e.g., ±100 mm from standard hitch ball 302 position, with testing using Position(x), Position(y), and/or Position(z)). Initially, a total of 16 strain gauge(s) 204 can be monitored, with potential to use fewer strain gauges to, for example, train a response surface model after an initial run to minimize the required sensors to be used as part of the hitch system. The response surface model can be used to calculate force values from stress readings (e.g., to be obtained using the strain gauge(s) 204). For example, as part of the hitch system design and/or optimization, it is important to accurately estimate a force magnitude and direction, not dependent on where in space the load is applied (e.g., allow calculation of any force values that are input into the system based on strain readings). As such, error evaluation can be performed (e.g., using a different set of force coordinates and components) to confirm that the response surface model can accurately calculate Fx, Fy, and Fz force components (e.g., example force components 502 (Ftx), 504 (Fty), and 506 (Ftz) of
Accuracy of the hitch using strain gauges can be determined by inputting strain values from a unique load case (e.g., generated using finite element analysis, FEA) into the response surface model (RSM), with outputs compared to the FEA load case inputs that were used to create the strain values. For example, FEA load case inputs can include the following:
(1) an X-force input (e.g., Fx_in=1000 N) with an X-position (e.g., Px_in=7657 mm);
(2) a Y-force input (e.g., Fy_in=5000 N) with a Y-position (e.g., Py_in=1 mm); and
(3) a Z-force input (e.g., Fz_in=5000 N) with a Z-position (e.g., Pz_in=487 mm).
Outputs (e.g., Fx_out, Px_out, Fy_out, Py_out, and Fz_out, Pz_out) can then be compared to the FEA load case inputs to generate an error calculation. Automating the input/output calculations allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the error in the system across a wider range of input values.
Optimization of the number of sensors (e.g., strain gauge(s) 204) to be used to calculate the force components can be performed to reduce the hitch system cost and complexity. For example, the identification of the six most sensitive sensors (e.g., the strain gauges 204A, 204B, 204C, 204D, 204E, and 204F of
The side members 610A, 610B (e.g., a first side member 610A and a second side member 610B) are attached to either side of the crossbar 606 and can be used to couple the hitch 602 to a vehicle. In some examples, the side member(s) 610A, 610B are coupled to the crossbar 606 via welds. However, the side member(s) 610A, 610B can be coupled to the crossbar 606 via any other suitable means (e.g., welded, riveted, press-fit, etc.). While one example implementation of the side member(s) 610A, 610B is illustrated in
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
Example heat maps 710, 730, 750 of
A flowchart representative of example methods, hardware implemented state machines, and/or any combination thereof for implementing the load manager 102 of
As mentioned above, the example method 800 of
“Including” and “comprising” (and all forms and tenses thereof) are used herein to be open ended terms. Thus, whenever a claim employs any form of “include” or “comprise” (e.g., comprises, includes, comprising, including, having, etc.) as a preamble or within a claim recitation of any kind, it is to be understood that additional elements, terms, etc. may be present without falling outside the scope of the corresponding claim or recitation. As used herein, when the phrase “at least” is used as the transition term in, for example, a preamble of a claim, it is open-ended in the same manner as the term “comprising” and “including” are open ended. The term “and/or” when used, for example, in a form such as A, B, and/or C refers to any combination or subset of A, B, C such as (1) A alone, (2) B alone, (3) C alone, (4) A with B, (5) A with C, (6) B with C, and (7) A with B and with C. As used herein in the context of describing structures, components, items, objects and/or things, the phrase “at least one of A and B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B. Similarly, as used herein in the context of describing structures, components, items, objects and/or things, the phrase “at least one of A or B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B. As used herein in the context of describing the performance or execution of processes, instructions, actions, activities and/or steps, the phrase “at least one of A and B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B. Similarly, as used herein in the context of describing the performance or execution of processes, instructions, actions, activities and/or steps, the phrase “at least one of A or B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B.
The load determiner 122 further determines if the load condition satisfies an alert threshold (block 815). If the load determiner 122 determines the load condition satisfies an alert threshold, the vehicle interface 124 can be used to display the alert condition to a user (e.g., via display 103) (block 825). If the load determiner 122 determines the load condition does not satisfy an alert threshold, an alert is triggered to inform the user (block 820). For example, the load condition can include various characteristics (e.g., weight, load orientation, braking force, etc.) experienced by the hitch 101. In some examples, the load determiner 122 can be used to estimate tongue weight of a trailer to promote proper utilization of trailer hitch systems in addition to lateral and brake/acceleration loads. If the load condition is determined to not be capable of maintaining the necessary strength to support a tow rating, the load determiner 122 can generate an audio alert, a visual alert, etc. In some examples, the load determiner 122 can generate an alert including a description of the load condition triggering the alert. In some examples, the load determiner 122 can generate an instruction indicating how to correct the load condition. In some examples, the vehicle interface 124 presents the load condition and/or alert (block 825). For example, the vehicle interface 124 can cause the vehicle 100 to present the load condition and/or the alert to the user via the display 103.
The processor platform 900 of the illustrated example includes a processor 912. The processor 912 of the illustrated example is hardware. For example, the processor 912 can be implemented by one or more integrated circuits, logic circuits, microprocessors, GPUs, DSPs, or controllers from any desired family or manufacturer. The hardware processor may be a semiconductor based (e.g., silicon based) device. In this example, the processor implements the example sensor interface 120, an example load determiner 122, and the example vehicle interface 124.
The processor 912 of the illustrated example includes a local memory 913 (e.g., a cache). The processor 912 of the illustrated example is in communication with a main memory including a volatile memory 914 and a non-volatile memory 916 via a bus 918. The volatile memory 914 may be implemented by Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS® Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM®) and/or any other type of random access memory device. The non-volatile memory 916 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the main memory 914, 916 is controlled by a memory controller.
The processor platform 900 of the illustrated example also includes an interface circuit 920. The interface circuit 920 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB), a Bluetooth® interface, a near field communication (NFC) interface, and/or a PCI express interface.
In the illustrated example, one or more input devices 922 are connected to the interface circuit 920. The input device(s) 922 permit(s) a user to enter data and/or commands into the processor 912. The input device(s) can be implemented by, for example, an audio sensor, a microphone, a camera (still or video), a keyboard, a button, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball, isopoint and/or a voice recognition system.
One or more output devices 924 are also connected to the interface circuit 920 of the illustrated example. The output devices 924 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a light emitting diode (LED), an organic light emitting diode (OLED), a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube display (CRT), an in-place switching (IPS) display, a touchscreen, etc.), a tactile output device, a printer and/or speaker. The interface circuit 920 of the illustrated example, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card, a graphics driver chip and/or a graphics driver processor.
The interface circuit 920 of the illustrated example also includes a communication device such as a transmitter, a receiver, a transceiver, a modem, a residential gateway, a wireless access point, and/or a network interface to facilitate exchange of data with external machines (e.g., computing devices of any kind) via a network 926. The communication can be via, for example, an Ethernet connection, a digital subscriber line (DSL) connection, a telephone line connection, a coaxial cable system, a satellite system, a line-of-site wireless system, a cellular telephone system, etc.
The processor platform 900 of the illustrated example also includes one or more mass storage devices 928 for storing software and/or data. Examples of such mass storage devices 928 include floppy disk drives, hard drive disks, compact disk drives, Blu-ray disk drives, redundant array of independent disks (RAID) systems, and digital versatile disk (DVD) drives.
The machine executable instructions 932 of
Example methods and apparatus for a load-sensing hitch utilizing a system of strain gauges are disclosed herein.
Example 1 includes an apparatus comprising a receiver tube, a side member, a crossbar coupled to the receiver tube and the side member, the crossbar including a support including a first end, a second end and a mid-portion located between the first end and the second end, the mid-portion having a cross-sectional area smaller than the cross-sectional area of the first end or the cross-sectional area of the second end, and a strain gauge disposed within the mid-portion.
Example 2 includes the apparatus of example 1, wherein the side member is a first side member coupled to a first crossbar end, the support is a first support, and further including a second side member disposed on a second crossbar end, and a second support disposed on the crossbar between the receiver tube and the first side member, the first support disposed between the receiver tube and the second side member.
Example 3 includes the apparatus of example 2, wherein the crossbar is bisected by the receiver tube.
Example 4 includes the apparatus of example 1, wherein the support is a first support, the strain gauge is a first strain gauge, and further including a chain bracket including a second support including a second strain gauge.
Example 5 includes the apparatus of example 4, wherein the chain bracket surrounds a portion of the receiver tube, the second support is adjacent a first side of the receiver tube, and the chain bracket further includes a third support adjacent a second side of the receiver tube, the second side opposite the first side.
Example 6 includes the apparatus of example 1, wherein the crossbar further includes a plurality of supports including the first support and a second support, each of the plurality of supports including a corresponding one of a plurality of strain gauges, the plurality of strain gauges including the strain gauge, the first support on a first side of the crossbar, the second support on a second side of the crossbar, the second side opposite the first side of the crossbar.
Example 7 includes the apparatus of example 6, further including a load manager to determine a load condition based on sensor data from the plurality of strain gauges.
Example 8 includes a vehicle comprising a frame, and a hitch including a receiver tube, a side member coupled to the frame, a crossbar coupled to the receiver tube and the side member, the crossbar including a support including a first end, a second end and a mid-portion located between the first end and the second end, the mid-portion having a cross-sectional area smaller than the cross-sectional area of the first end or the cross-sectional area of the second end, and a strain gauge disposed within the mid-portion.
Example 9 includes the vehicle of example 8, wherein the side member is a first side member coupled to a first crossbar end, the support is a first support, and further including a second side member disposed on a second crossbar end, and a second support disposed on the crossbar between the receiver tube and the first side member, the first support disposed between the receiver tube and the second side member.
Example 10 includes the vehicle of example 8, wherein the crossbar is bisected by the receiver tube.
Example 11 includes the vehicle of example 8, wherein the support is a first support, the strain gauge is a first strain gauge, and further including a chain bracket including a second support including a second strain gauge.
Example 12 includes the vehicle of example 11, wherein the chain bracket surrounds a portion of the receiver tube, the second support is adjacent a first side of the receiver tube, and the chain bracket further includes a third support adjacent a second side of the receiver tube, the second side opposite the first side.
Example 13 includes the vehicle of example 8, wherein the crossbar further includes a plurality of supports including the first support and a second support, each of the plurality of supports including a corresponding one of a plurality of strain gauges, the plurality of strain gauges including the strain gauge, the first support on a first side of the crossbar, the second support on a second side of the crossbar, the second side opposite the first side of the crossbar.
Example 14 includes the vehicle of example 13, further including a load manager to determine a load condition based on sensor data from the plurality of strain gauges.
Example 15 includes an apparatus comprising memory, and a processor to execute instructions to receive load data associated with a hitch of a vehicle from a strain gauge, the strain gauge positioned at a mid-portion of a support, the support disposed on a crossbar of the hitch, determine a load condition of the hitch based on the load data, and generate an alert to present via a user interface when the load condition satisfies an alert threshold.
Example 16 includes the apparatus of example 15, wherein the alert threshold corresponds to at least one of exceeding a tow rating of the vehicle or an unbalanced load condition.
Example 17 includes the apparatus of example 15, wherein the load data is first load data, the support is a first support, and the strain gauge is a first strain gauge, and the processor executes instructions to determine the load condition based on second load data, the second load data received from a second strain gauge of a second support.
Example 18 includes the apparatus of example 17, wherein the second support is disposed on a chain bracket of the hitch.
Example 19 includes the apparatus of example 17, wherein the first strain gauge is disposed on a driver-side of the crossbar and the second strain gauge is disposed on a passenger-side of the crossbar.
Example 20 includes the apparatus of example 17, wherein the first strain gauge is disposed of a vehicle-facing side of the crossbar and the second strain gauge is disposed on a rear-facing side of the crossbar.
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been disclosed herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.
This patent arises from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/848,486, filed on Apr. 14, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5511812 | Milner | Apr 1996 | A |
8103414 | Boss et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8380390 | Sy et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
9327566 | McAllister | May 2016 | B2 |
9464953 | Wirthlin | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9643462 | McAllister | May 2017 | B2 |
9870653 | Fritz et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9981512 | Gentner | May 2018 | B2 |
10696109 | Gießibl | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10899183 | Niedert et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
11097580 | Niedert et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11524534 | Giaier et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11548334 | Niedert | Jan 2023 | B2 |
20130038436 | Brey et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130080078 | Wirthlin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130253814 | Wirthlin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140360282 | Gießibl | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150137482 | Woolf et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20190033150 | Lassche | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190070915 | Gentner et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190084362 | Sielhorst et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190143769 | Niedert et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190263204 | Reed et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190265112 | Reed et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190315169 | Rogness et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190344631 | Gießibl | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200180371 | Niedert et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200198422 | Niedert et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200355563 | Schamer | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200384818 | Giaier et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210039457 | Niedert et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210170818 | Doman et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102014217801 | Mar 2016 | DE |
2363307 | Sep 2011 | EP |
3028882 | Jun 2016 | EP |
3698994 | Aug 2020 | EP |
2018171937 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2020243703 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wirthlin, “Intelligent Hitch for Measuring Both Trailer Weight and Tongue Weight,” Jun. 26, 2015, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” dated Jan. 14, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/848,486, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Apr. 15, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/848,486, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Aug. 11, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/848,486, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230107447 A1 | Apr 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16848486 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 18079200 | US |