This disclosure relates generally to aircraft component testing and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for artificial bird manufacturing in impact testing.
Turbine engines are some of the most widely used power generating technologies. Gas turbines are an example of an internal combustion engine that uses a burning air-fuel mixture to produce hot gases that spin the turbine, thereby generating power. Application of gas turbines can be found in aircraft, trains, ships, electrical generators, gas compressors, and pumps. For example, modern aircraft rely on a variety of gas turbine engines as part of a propulsion system to generate thrust, including a turbojet, a turbofan, a turboprop, and an afterburning turbojet. Such engines include a combustion section, a compressor section, a turbine section, and an inlet, providing high power output with a high thermal efficiency.
Component testing of aircraft-based gas turbines includes evaluation of engine response to a bird strike. Bird strikes can lead to permanent deformations, sudden decreases of thrust, and/or potential engine failure. Engine design accounting for unavoidable bird strikes can be used to reduce the severity of potential damage resulting from bird ingestion (e.g., passage of a bird into the engine inlet or impact with engine structure). Artificial birds can be developed to simulate the mass, shape, density, and/or impact effect(s) of birds during ingestion testing. However, reproducing the physical properties of real birds (e.g., including different bird species) can be challenging and lack in consistency. Accordingly, a consistent and reproducible method of artificial bird manufacturing for use in testing aircraft components would be welcomed in the technology.
The figures are not to scale. Instead, the thickness of the layers or regions may be enlarged in the drawings. In general, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawing(s) and accompanying written description to refer to the same or like parts. As used in this patent, stating that any part (e.g., a layer, film, area, region, or plate) is in any way on (e.g., positioned on, located on, disposed on, or formed on, etc.) another part, indicates that the referenced part is either in contact with the other part, or that the referenced part is above the other part with one or more intermediate part(s) located therebetween. Connection references (e.g., attached, coupled, connected, and joined) are to be construed broadly and may include intermediate members between a collection of elements and relative movement between elements unless otherwise indicated. As such, connection references do not necessarily infer that two elements are directly connected and in fixed relation to each other. Stating that any part is in “contact” with another part means that there is no intermediate part between the two parts. Although the figures show layers and regions with clean lines and boundaries, some or all of these lines and/or boundaries may be idealized. In reality, the boundaries and/or lines may be unobservable, blended, and/or irregular.
Methods and apparatus for artificial bird manufacturing in impact testing are disclosed.
Certain examples include an apparatus to generate an artificial bird for impact testing. The example apparatus includes a mold generator to form a mold based on a bird class identification, a mold filler to fill the mold with a first layer of crushed ice and a second layer of crushed ice, and a compressor to compress an ice surface of at least one of the first layer or the second layer of the crushed ice to form indentations on the ice surface. The example apparatus includes a freezer to re-freeze the crushed ice layers inside the mold to form an artificial bird.
Certain examples provide a method to generate an artificial bird for impact testing. The example method includes forming a mold based on a bird class identification, filling the mold with a first layer of crushed ice and a second layer of crushed ice, and compressing an ice surface of at least one of the first layer or the second layer of the crushed ice to form indentations on the ice surface. The example method includes re-freezing the crushed ice layers inside the mold to form an artificial bird.
Certain examples provide a method of manufacturing an artificial bird for impact testing. The example method includes crushing an amount of ice corresponding to a desired artificial bird weight, positioning a first layer of crushed ice inside a mold, compressing a top of the first layer of the crushed ice, and moistening the compressed top of the first layer. The example method includes positioning a second layer of crushed ice on the first layer.
Bird ingestion during aircraft operation can occur during any phase of flight, but is most common during take-off, initial climb, approach, and/or landing. While small aircraft are more likely to experience structural damage (e.g., damage to control surfaces, penetration of windscreens, etc.), larger aircraft experience engine-based bird ingestion, with a potential partial or complete loss of control and/or erroneous instrument reading(s) resulting from loss of flight instrument function due to the impact effects. Any part of the front engine of an aircraft can be struck by a bird, including inlet mounted components (e.g., inlet sensors), nose cone, spinner on the fan or compressor rotor, an engine protection device (e.g., inlet barrier filter), engine inlet guide vane assembly, and/or fan or compressor blades. In some examples, first stage rotating blades (e.g., first exposed stages of any fan or compressor rotor) are susceptible to a bird ingestion event and/or a bird strike. As such, engines require design and structurally and/or operationally tolerant construction to withstand a bird ingestion event. In some examples, assessing an engine's ability to withstand a bird ingestion and/or impact can be based on testing of various bird sizes, potential velocities, target location(s), and/or rotor speed(s). Artificial birds can be developed to simulate the mass, shape, density, and/or impact effects of various bird species.
Maximum impact damage to the engine as a result of bird ingestion can be determined using a critical impact parameter (CIP), represented as a function of bird mass, bird velocity, fan or rotor speed, bird impact or aiming location, and/or fan or rotor blade geometry. For example, the CIP can be fan blade leading edge stress or any other design feature(s) and/or parameter(s) (e.g., most limiting parameter to consider for impact testing). The CIP can vary based on the type of engine structure and/or sub-structure used (e.g., turbofan first stage fan blades, fan blades with part span shrouds, unshrouded wide cord fan blades, etc.), and also depends on bird velocity or bird mass (e.g., variations in bird mass affect the resulting slice mass during bird ingestion). For example, the CIP can be any of a leading-edge stress, a blade root stress (e.g., for first stage fan blades), a blade deflection producing shroud shingling (e.g., for fan blades with part span shrouds), or a blade twist in a dovetail leading to trailing blade impact (e.g., for unshrouded wide chord fan blades).
Small, medium, and/or single large bird ingestion tests can be performed to ensure engine tolerance to potential bird ingestion and compliance with regulatory guidelines. For example, bird debris impact can damage critical internal components if the engine lacks sufficient strength and/or resistance to bird ingestion events (e.g., frame struts or strut fairings housing fuel, oil, high pressure bleed air lines, etc.). As such, effects of bird strikes should be investigated to account for rotating components, compressor casing strength, potential blade failure, and/or strength of engine structure(s) and/or shaft(s). Additionally, engine response to a large bird ingestion can be evaluated to account for effects of engine unbalance loads, surge related loads, torque loads, and/or axial loads. For example, testing can focus on targeting an artificial bird for a core primary flowpath and/or over a fan face area (e.g., allowing for an even distribution of bird targets over an engine's front face), determining whether a particular bird size passes through the engine inlet into the rotor blades, and/or identifying whether the engine can maintain a specific take-off power or thrust level after a bird ingestion event.
Current methods to determine engine response to an ingestion event can include use of real bird bodies during aircraft component testing. Artificial birds provide an alternative to the use of bird carcasses, reducing the need to euthanize birds for testing purposes as well as reducing overall costs and achieving reproducible testing results. While used for pre-certification testing to prove bird-strike resistance of aircraft components, artificial birds may not be designed based on the physical properties of real birds, but instead represent artificial projectiles that are fired at an aircraft component at an operational velocity that would be representative of a potential bird strike. In some examples, a number of different shapes can be used to create a mass, density, diameter, and/or length of the artificial projectile for use during targeted bird strike testing. Additionally, internal densities of the artificial projectiles vary and may not accurately mimic the density of a real bird for a range of bird species.
Methods and apparatus disclosed herein for artificial bird manufacturing allow for consistent and reproducible formation of structures that have bird-like features that reflect the amount of energy that can be released during bird ingestion by a turbine engine. Additionally, methods and apparatus disclosed herein allow for a systematic method for processing and handling an artificial bird for purposes of impact testing of an aircraft engine, including stationary and/or rotating engine components. Examples disclosed herein describe the use of a mold to form an artificial bird based on crushed ice processing (e.g., layering, compression, etc.). As such, an artificial bird can be manufactured that represents the type of impact that a real bird can cause during a bird ingestion event (e.g., kinetic energy release), while permitting the formation of a structure that is uniform in shape and density, thereby allowing for consistent testing and analysis correlation. Furthermore, methods and apparatus disclosed herein permit the artificial bird to remain intact (e.g., not break up) when it is mounted and released during testing. While methods and apparatus disclosed herein focus on artificial bird manufacturing for purposes of turbine engine testing, the methods and apparatus disclosed herein can be used for testing of any applicable blade-based equipment (e.g., wind turbines, etc.) and/or any structural testing for potential aviation-related bird-based collisions.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific examples that may be practiced. These examples are described in sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice the subject matter, and it is to be understood that other examples may be utilized. The following detailed description is therefore, provided to describe an exemplary implementation and not to be taken limiting on the scope of the subject matter described in this disclosure. Certain features from different aspects of the following description may be combined to form yet new aspects of the subject matter discussed below.
“Including” and “comprising” (and all forms and tenses thereof) are used herein to be open ended terms. Thus, whenever a claim employs any form of “include” or “comprise” (e.g., comprises, includes, comprising, including, having, etc.) as a preamble or within a claim recitation of any kind, it is to be understood that additional elements, terms, etc. may be present without falling outside the scope of the corresponding claim or recitation. As used herein, when the phrase “at least” is used as the transition term in, for example, a preamble of a claim, it is open-ended in the same manner as the term “comprising” and “including” are open ended. The term “and/or” when used, for example, in a form such as A, B, and/or C refers to any combination or subset of A, B, C such as (1) A alone, (2) B alone, (3) C alone, (4) A with B, (5) A with C, (6) B with C, and (7) A with B and with C. As used herein in the context of describing structures, components, items, objects and/or things, the phrase “at least one of A and B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B. Similarly, as used herein in the context of describing structures, components, items, objects and/or things, the phrase “at least one of A or B” is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B. As used herein in the context of describing the performance or execution of processes, instructions, actions, activities and/or steps, the phrase “at least one of A and B is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B. Similarly, as used herein in the context of describing the performance or execution of processes, instructions, actions, activities and/or steps, the phrase “at least one of A or B is intended to refer to implementations including any of (1) at least one A, (2) at least one B, and (3) at least one A and at least one B.
As used herein, singular references (e.g., “a”, “an”, “first”, “second”, etc.) do not exclude a plurality. The term “a” or “an” entity, as used herein, refers to one or more of that entity. The terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more”, and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. Furthermore, although individually listed, a plurality of means, elements or method actions may be implemented by, e.g., a single unit or processor. Additionally, although individual features may be included in different examples or claims, these may possibly be combined, and the inclusion in different examples or claims does not imply that a combination of features is not feasible and/or advantageous.
As used herein, the terms “system,” “unit,” “module,”, “engine,”, “component,” etc., may include a hardware and/or software system that operates to perform one or more functions. For example, a module, unit, or system may include a computer processor, controller, and/or other logic-based device that performs operations based on instructions stored on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a computer memory. Alternatively, a module, unit, or system may include a hard-wires device that performs operations based on hard-wired logic of the device. Various modules, units, engines, and/or systems shown in the attached figures may represent the hardware that operates based on software or hardwired instructions, the software that directs hardware to perform the operations, or a combination thereof.
The controller 210 controls the artificial bird making process, including determining the desired bird class using the bird class determiner 215, generating a mold (e.g., based on the desired bird class) using the mold generator 220, filling the mold (e.g., with crushed ice) using the mold filler 225, compressing the crushed ice using the compressor 230, spraying one or more layers of the ice (e.g., to mist the ice surface with water) using the sprayer 235, freezing and/or refreezing the crushed ice layers using the freezer 240, sectioning the formed ice structure using the sectioner 245, determining the density of the ice structure using the density determiner 250, assessing test results (e.g., from density measurements, etc.) using the test results analyzer 255, and/or storing parameters (e.g., input by a user and/or determined by the artificial bird maker 205) in the data storage 260. In some examples, the controller 210 modifies settings (e.g., temperature, ice granularity, freezing time, number of ice layers, etc.) based on inputs provided by a user and/or determined during testing and assessment of a given formed artificial bird (e.g., based on desired criteria of the finalized artificial bird structure). For example, the controller 210 can modify a mold shape (e.g., length, diameter, etc.) based on a desired bird class (e.g., bird size, weight, etc.). In some examples, the controller 210 fills a mold with a given number of ice layers based on the mold parameters and/or the desired artificial bird density.
The bird class determiner 215 determines a bird class identification for an artificial bird. For example, the bird class can be based on an intended final artificial bird size (e.g., small, medium, large) and/or the intended artificial bird parameters (e.g., length, width, weight, etc.). In some examples, the bird class determiner 215 can receive input from a user that specifies the type and/or number of artificial birds that need to be manufactured. In some examples, the bird class determiner 215 determines the bird density that corresponds to a given bird class (e.g., 0.60-1.0 g/cm3). In some examples, the bird class determiner 215 identifies the type of artificial bird to manufacture based on desired avian body characteristics (e.g., species, age, diameter, wingspan, etc.).
The mold generator 220 generates a mold (e.g., mold 115 of
The mold filler 225 fills the mold (e.g., generated using the mold generator 220) with layers of ice (e.g., crushed ice). In some examples, the mold filler 225 determines the amount of ice needed (e.g., total weight of ice that requires crushing prior to filling the mold). In some examples, the mold filler 225 determines a ratio of water to ice that the mold 115 is filled with for a certain bird class. In some examples, the mold filler 225 weighs the crushed ice in real-time to determine the amount of ice crushed (e.g., amount of ice to add and/or subtract from the mold). In some examples, the mold filler 225 includes a colored dye (e.g., mixed with the ice) to allow the artificial bird to have a designated color (e.g., for identification purposes, etc.). Prior to filling of the mold 115, the mold filler 225 can prepare the ice formulation using a mixer until a desired consistency of the ice is reached. Once the ice formulation is prepared, the mold filler 225 can pour the crushed ice into the mold 115 (e.g., layer-by-layer). For example, the mold filler 225 can fill the mold with a first layer of crushed ice followed by a second layer of crushed ice. In some examples, the first layer and/or the second layer of the crushed ice (e.g., layers 110a, 110b of
The compressor 230 compresses the crushed ice inside the mold 115. In some examples, the compressor can use a tamper (e.g., flat tamper, cleated tamper, etc.) to apply compression strokes to the ice layer surface (e.g., the surface of layers 110a, 110b). For example, the application of multiple compression strokes (e.g., 3-10 strokes) to the ice surface layer(s) can create indentation on the surface of the ice. In some examples, any other type of compressive force application can be used to compress the ice layer(s) during layers of the crushed ice by the mold filler 225. In some examples, all ice layers within the mold can be compressed prior to the application of each subsequent ice layer. In some examples, designated ice layer(s) can be compressed depending on the desired consistency and/or final density of the artificial bird 105.
The sprayer 235 sprays and/or mists the surface of the ice layers (e.g., layers 110a, 110b). For example, the sprayer 235 can evenly mist the ice layer surface(s) with water prior to the addition of a subsequent crushed ice layer (e.g., using the mold filler 225). For example, misting the ice layer surface(s) can improve the bond between the crushed ice layer(s) 110a, 110b. In some examples, the sprayer 235 mists each surface of the ice layer(s) within the mold 115. In some examples, the sprayer 235 mists the surface(s) of the ice layer(s) within the mold selectively (e.g., based on the bonding strength between the ice layer(s)).
The freezer 240 freezes the crushed ice layer(s) inside the mold 115. For example, once the mold filler 225 has filled the mold 115 with the ice layer(s), the freezer 240 re-freezes the crushed ice inside the mold (e.g., 10-20 hours). In some examples, the freezer 240 regulates the ambient temperature (e.g., between −25 degrees Celsius to −10 degrees Celsius). In some examples, the freezer 240 can be used to refreeze the crushed ice within the mold 115 before the entire mold has been filled with the one or more crushed ice layer(s).
The sectioner 245 cuts the artificial bird 105 into sections to adjust the artificial bird 105 length and/or determine the ice density of the formed ice structure representing the artificial bird 105. In some examples, the sectioner 245 sections the re-frozen crushed ice into sections of equivalent size (e.g., sections 155, 160, 165 of
The density determiner 250 determines the density of the artificial bird 105. For example, the density determiner 250 can determine the ice density of one or more of the sections obtained using the sectioner 245. In some examples, the density determiner 250 determines whether the density of the artificial bird 105 is uniform and/or corresponds to the desired density of the selected bird class (e.g., based on the bird class determiner 215). In some examples, the artificial bird 105 sectioned using the sectioner 245 to determine whether the ice density of the artificial bird 105 is uniform is not further used for bird ingestion testing. For example, once the artificial bird 105 density has been confirmed to be consistent throughout the entire ice structure, the artificial bird maker 205 can be used to form one or more artificial bird(s) 105 based on the methodology (e.g., temperature setting, number of compression strikes, etc.) that yielded the desired bird size and/or density.
The test results analyzer 255 analyzes the determined ice densities obtained during testing and/or development of the artificial bird(s) 105 to compare the ice densities to known and/or desired ice densities for a given bird class. In some examples, the test results analyzer 255 determines whether the developed artificial bird(s) 105 yields the level of kinetic energy during impact testing (e.g., on a turbofan structure) that would be expected when using real birds. For example, the test results analyzer 255 can be used to determine kinetic energy release over time during impact testing and/or assess the impact effect on a given structure of the engine. In some examples, the test results analyzer 255 can determine whether the energy input of the artificial bird 105 corresponds to the energy input of a real bird at various impact points along a given aircraft structure (e.g., strain comparison). In some examples, the test results analyzer 255 determines the target density of the artificial bird and identifies the range of densities that fall within the target density range without significant variation from the target density (e.g., an upper limit and/or a lower limit acceptable for the final artificial bird 105 density).
The data storage 260 stores any information associated with the artificial bird maker 205. For example, the data storage 260 can store bird class determinations made by the bird class determiner 215, mold parameters determined using the mold generator 220, a number of ice layers used to fill the mold 115 using the mold filler 225, the number of compression stokes performed using the compressor 230, the amount and/or duration of misting performed by the sprayer 235, the temperature(s) used for re-freezing by the freezer 240, the density values determined during ice density evaluation using the density determiner 250, and/or the artificial bird testing results obtained using the test results analyzer 255 (e.g., impact testing results, energy expenditures, etc.). The example data storage 260 of the illustrated example of
While an example implementation of the artificial bird maker 205 is illustrated in
Flowcharts representative of example hardware logic, machine readable instructions, hardware implemented state machines, and/or any combination thereof for implementing the example artificial bird maker 205 are shown in
The machine readable instructions described herein may be stored in one or more of a compressed format, an encrypted format, a fragmented format, a compiled format, an executable format, a packaged format, etc. Machine readable instructions as described herein may be stored as data (e.g., portions of instructions, code, representations of code, etc.) that may be utilized to create, manufacture, and/or produce machine executable instructions. For example, the machine readable instructions may be fragmented and stored on one or more storage devices and/or computing devices (e.g., servers). The machine readable instructions may require one or more of installation, modification, adaptation, updating, combining, supplementing, configuring, decryption, decompression, unpacking, distribution, reassignment, compilation, etc. in order to make them directly readable, interpretable, and/or executable by a computing device and/or other machine. For example, the machine readable instructions may be stored in multiple parts, which are individually compressed, encrypted, and stored on separate computing devices, wherein the parts when decrypted, decompressed, and combined form a set of executable instructions that implement a program such as that described herein.
In another example, the machine readable instructions may be stored in a state in which they may be read by a computer, but require addition of a library (e.g., a dynamic link library (DLL)), a software development kit (SDK), an application programming interface (API), etc. in order to execute the instructions on a particular computing device or other device. In another example, the machine readable instructions may need to be configured (e.g., settings stored, data input, network addresses recorded, etc.) before the machine readable instructions and/or the corresponding program(s) can be executed in whole or in part. Thus, the disclosed machine readable instructions and/or corresponding program(s) are intended to encompass such machine readable instructions and/or program(s) regardless of the particular format or state of the machine readable instructions and/or program(s) when stored or otherwise at rest or in transit.
The machine readable instructions described herein can be represented by any past, present, or future instruction language, scripting language, programming language, etc. For example, the machine readable instructions may be represented using any of the following languages: C, C++, Java, C#, Perl, Python, JavaScript, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Structured Query Language (SQL), Swift, etc.
As mentioned above, the example processes of
The artificial bird maker 205 can further use the sectioner 245 to section the artificial bird 105 into one or more sections that can be used for evaluating the ice density of the artificial bird 105 (block 315). For example, the sectioner 245 sections the artificial bird 105 into sections of equal length (e.g., a total of seven sections of equal length), as described in connection with
Once an artificial bird 105 has been formed with uniform density and the production of artificial bird(s) 105 begins for purposes of bird ingestion testing, a portion (e.g., at least one out of 20-30, etc.) of artificial birds can be tested during production to ensure that the density of the artificial bird remains consistent. In some examples, fluctuations in the ambient conditions can require more frequent testing (e.g., sectioning of a sample bird to determine its density) during the production process. To prepare the artificial bird(s) 105 for impact testing, the artificial bird maker 205 can position velocity target(s) inside the artificial bird 105 (block 335). For example, diameter paper velocity targets can be inserted into the artificial bird 105. For example, a total of size velocity targets can be positioned inside the artificial bird 105 by melting the side of the bird near the top, middle and bottom of the artificial bird 105 (e.g., using a target insertion tool) and inserting the velocity target(s). In some examples, the velocity targets can be further positioned at 120 degrees from the first velocity target set (e.g., for a slice view camera). In some examples, the freezer 240 freezes the artificial bird 105 once the velocity targets have been inserted into the bird and a few drops of water positioned over the top of the targets (e.g., to secure the targets within the bird).
Artificial bird(s) 105 manufactured for purposes of impact testing can be used by the artificial bird maker 105 to perform simulated bird ingestion on stationary and/or rotating engine components (block 340). For example, as described in connection with
Once the compressor 230 has compressed the ice surface of the first ice layer using the flat tamper and/or the cleated tamper, the sprayer 235 can be used to moisten the compressed layer of the crushed ice with water (e.g., to improve adhesion between the ice layers) (block 420). For example, the sprayer 235 can mist the surface of the ice with water prior to the positioning of a subsequent ice layer on top of the first ice layer. The mold filler 225 fills the mold with a subsequent layer of the crushed ice (e.g., a second crushed ice layer) (block 425). In some examples, the surface of the second layer of the crushed ice can also be compressed (e.g., using the compressor 230) and/or moistened (e.g., using the sprayer 235), as described in connection with the first ice surface layer (block 430). Once the mold filler 225 has filled the mold 115 with the ice layers (block 435), the controller 210 can determine whether the desired bird weight has been achieved (block 445). If the controller 210 determines that the mold 115 is not yet filled, control returns to the mold filler 225 to proceed with filling the mold with the crushed ice layer(s) (block 425). Once the controller 210 determines that the desired bird weight has been achieved (block 445) (e.g., based on the selected bird class), the crushed ice layers within the mold 115 are re-frozen, as described in connection with
The processor platform 500 of the illustrated example includes a processor 512. The processor 512 of the illustrated example is hardware. For example, the processor 512 can be implemented by one or more integrated circuits, logic circuits, microprocessors, GPUs, DSPs, or controllers from any desired family or manufacturer. The hardware processor may be a semiconductor based (e.g., silicon based) device. In this example, the processor 512 implements the example controller 210, the example bird class determiner 215, the example mold generator 220, the example mold filler 225, the example compressor 230, the example sprayer 235, the example freezer 240, the example sectioner 245, the example density determiner 250, and/or the example test results analyzer 255.
The processor 512 of the illustrated example includes a local memory 513 (e.g., a cache). The processor 512 of the illustrated example is in communication with a main memory including a volatile memory 514 and a non-volatile memory 516 via a bus 518. The volatile memory 514 may be implemented by Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS® Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM®) and/or any other type of random access memory device. The non-volatile memory 516 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the volatile memory 514 and the non-volatile memory 516 is controlled by a memory controller.
The processor platform 500 of the illustrated example also includes an interface circuit 520. The interface circuit 520 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB), a Bluetooth® interface, a near field communication (NFC) interface, and/or a PCI express interface.
In the illustrated example, one or more input devices 522 are connected to the interface circuit 520. The input device(s) 522 permit(s) a user to enter data and/or commands into the processor 512. The input device(s) 522 can be implemented by, for example, an audio sensor, a microphone, a camera (still or video), a keyboard, a button, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball, isopoint and/or a voice recognition system.
One or more output devices 524 are also connected to the interface circuit 520 of the illustrated example. The output devices 524 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a light emitting diode (LED), an organic light emitting diode (OLED), a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube display (CRT), an in-place switching (IPS) display, a touchscreen, etc.), a tactile output device, a printer and/or speaker. The interface circuit 520 of the illustrated example, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card, a graphics driver chip and/or a graphics driver processor.
The interface circuit 520 of the illustrated example also includes a communication device such as a transmitter, a receiver, a transceiver, a modem, a residential gateway, a wireless access point, and/or a network interface to facilitate exchange of data with external machines (e.g., computing devices of any kind) via a network 526. The communication can be via, for example, an Ethernet connection, a digital subscriber line (DSL) connection, a telephone line connection, a coaxial cable system, a satellite system, a line-of-site wireless system, a cellular telephone system, etc.
The processor platform 500 of the illustrated example also includes one or more mass storage devices 528 for storing software and/or data. Examples of such mass storage devices 528 include floppy disk drives, hard drive disks, compact disk drives, Blu-ray disk drives, redundant array of independent disks (RAID) systems, and digital versatile disk (DVD) drives.
The machine executable instructions 532 of
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the disclosed methods and apparatus permit for consistent and reproducible formation of ice structures that are representative of real bird densities encountered during engine operation. For example, artificial birds formed using the methods and apparatus described herein meet the criteria for bird ingestion testing (e.g., bird densities) as set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). For example, artificial birds formed using the methods and apparatus described herein reflect the amount of energy that can be released during bird ingestion by a turbine engine. Additionally, methods and apparatus disclosed herein allow for a systematic method for processing and handling an artificial bird for purposes of impact testing of an aircraft engine, including stationary and/or rotating engine components. As such, an artificial bird can be manufactured that represents the type of impact that a real bird can cause during a bird ingestion event (e.g., kinetic energy release), while permitting the formation of a structure that is uniform in shape and density, thereby allowing for consistent testing and analysis correlation. While the examples disclosed herein describe artificial bird fabrication for testing in aircraft-based systems, the methods and apparatus disclosed herein can be used for testing of the structural components of any type of engine and/or vehicle that encounters strikes with objects that are within the range of the aforementioned bird densities.
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been disclosed herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.
The following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description by this reference, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the present disclosure.
Further aspects of the disclosure are provided by the subject matter of the following clauses:
An apparatus to generate an artificial bird for impact testing, the apparatus including a mold generator to form a mold based on a bird class identification, a mold filler to fill the mold with a first layer of crushed ice and a second layer of crushed ice, a compressor to compress an ice surface of at least one of the first layer or the second layer of the crushed ice to form indentations on the ice surface, and a freezer to re-freeze the crushed ice layers inside the mold to form an artificial bird.
The apparatus of any preceding clause, further including a sectioner to section the artificial bird into sections of equal size to determine a density of at least one of the sections.
The apparatus of any preceding clause, wherein the bird class identification includes a bird weight, the bird weight used to determine a total amount of crushed ice used to fill the mold.
The apparatus of any preceding clause, wherein the compressor uses a flat tamper or a cleated tamper to apply one or more compression strokes to the ice surface.
The apparatus of any preceding clause further including a sprayer to mist an ice surface of the first layer with water prior to positioning the second layer of the crushed ice on the first layer of the crushed ice.
The apparatus of any preceding clause further including a controller to control parameters associated with generating the artificial bird, including at least one of a temperature, a number of ice layers, or a number of compression strokes.
A method to generate an artificial bird for impact testing, the method including forming a mold based on a bird class identification, filling the mold with a first layer of crushed ice and a second layer of crushed ice, compressing an ice surface of at least one of the first layer or the second layer of the crushed ice to form indentations on the ice surface, and re-freezing the crushed ice layers inside the mold to form an artificial bird.
The method of any preceding clause, further including sectioning the artificial bird into sections of equal size to determine an ice density of at least one section.
The method of any preceding clause wherein the compressing includes applying compression strokes to the ice to form one or more indentations on a surface of the ice.
The method of any preceding clause wherein the compression strokes are performed using a cleated tamper.
The method of any preceding clause further including misting a surface of the first layer or the second layer of the crushed ice prior to applying a subsequent layer of crushed ice.
The method of any preceding clause further including positioning a velocity target inside the artificial bird.
The method of any preceding clause further including performing a simulated bird ingestion event using artificial bird.
The method of any preceding clause further including determining impact energy release during the simulated bird ingestion event.
The method of any preceding clause wherein the mold is cylindrical.
A method of manufacturing an artificial bird for impact testing, including crushing an amount of ice corresponding to a desired artificial bird weight, positioning a first layer of crushed ice inside a mold, compressing a top of the first layer of the crushed ice, moistening the compressed top of the first layer, and positioning a second layer of crushed ice on the first layer.
The method of any preceding clause further including refreezing the crushed ice inside the mold to form the artificial bird.
The method of any preceding clause wherein the artificial bird is of uniform density.
The method of any preceding clause wherein the compressing is performed using a flat tamper followed by a cleated tamper.
The method of any preceding clause wherein parameters associated with generating the artificial bird are controlled during the bird formation, including at least one of a temperature, a number of ice layers, or a number of compression strokes.