The invention relates generally to lighting apparatus and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for causing LEDs to generate light output comprising a modulated signal.
Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) are increasingly being adopted as general illumination lighting sources due to their high energy efficiency and long service life relative to traditional sources of light such as incandescent, fluorescent and halogen. Each generation of LEDs are providing improvements in energy efficiency and cost per lumen, thus allowing for lighting manufacturers to produce LED light fixtures at increasingly cost competitive prices.
While the component LEDs are increasing in energy efficiency, there are considerable other components within an LED light fixture that cause drains on the overall lumens per Watt achievable within the overall system. For instance, inefficiencies within the optics used and the AC/DC power supply both reduce the overall energy efficiency for the light fixture. Further, operating the LEDs at non-optimal current (amperage) levels can reduce the energy efficiency of the LEDs and therefore the overall light fixture. In fact, if the current flowing through the LEDs exceeds a maximum allowable level, the LEDs may be damaged or permanently burnt out, and thus require replacement.
One issue that arises when managing the current flow through the LEDs is that LEDs are not constant in terms of their forward voltages (voltage drops), or other characteristics such as color/color temperature and brightness. Each LED that is manufactured is generally categorized based on a number of criteria including their forward voltage, this categorization being based on bin codes and therefore called “binning” In manufacturing light fixtures with LEDs, the developer will generally want a consistent light output from each of its “identical” light fixtures. To do this, the manufacturer will select the binning of its LEDs to be consistent. A problem that arises is that the more narrow the binning criteria provided by the developer, the higher prices that are typically charged for the LEDs. On the other hand, it becomes difficult to design a circuit for the LEDs if the uncertainty related to the forward voltages of the LEDs is significant.
In some architectures, the LED light fixtures are powered with a constant current power supply that can be locked to a particular current through a feedback control system using an inductor. In this architecture, the control system can manage differences in forward voltages within the LEDs within a predefined limit.
In other architectures, a constant voltage power supply is used and the current to flow through the LEDs is controlled by the voltage output from the voltage power supply and the impedances within the circuit. In this case, differences in forward voltages across LEDs within different light fixtures can make a significant difference in the current flowing through the LEDs. Further, the voltage output from the constant voltage power supply may be adjustable and adjustments in the voltage supply can further change the current flowing through the LEDs.
Against this background, there is a need for solutions that will mitigate at least one of the above problems and, in particular, to enable monitoring and/or control of the current flowing through the LEDs while not materially decreasing the efficiency of the system.
According to a first broad aspect, the invention seeks to provide a method comprising: determining a current level within a lighting circuit; and causing communication of an indication of the current level to cause a change in a DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit. In embodiments of the present invention, the DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit is generated by a constant voltage power supply that is adjustable within a range of DC supply voltage levels.
In some embodiments, a supply voltage control signal is generated using the current level and is transmitted to the constant voltage power supply to cause the constant voltage power supply to change the DC supply voltage level applied to the lighting circuit. In other embodiments, light output from the lighting circuit is controlled to provide the indication of the current level. In some embodiments, the indication of the current level is transmitted to a display apparatus. The method in some cases further comprises changing a DC supply voltage level applied to the lighting circuit in response to the communication of the indication of the current level.
According to a second broad aspect, the invention seeks to provide a lighting apparatus comprising a lighting circuit and a controller. The controller is operable to determine a current level within the lighting circuit and to cause communication of an indication of the current level to cause a change in a DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit. In some embodiments, the lighting apparatus further comprises a constant voltage power supply operable to generate the DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit, the DC supply voltage being adjustable within a range of DC supply voltages levels.
According to a third broad aspect, the invention seeks to provide a lighting apparatus comprising a lighting circuit and a controller. The controller is operable to determine a current level within the lighting circuit and to cause a change in a DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit in response to the current level. In some embodiments, the lighting apparatus further comprises a constant voltage power supply operable to generate the DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit, the DC supply voltage being adjustable within a range of DC supply voltages levels. In further embodiments, to cause a change in a DC supply voltage applied to the lighting circuit, the controller is operable to generate a supply voltage control signal using the current level and to transmit the supply voltage control signal to the constant voltage power supply to cause the constant voltage power supply to change the DC supply voltage level applied to the lighting circuit.
These and other aspects of the invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following description of certain embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
A detailed description of embodiments of the invention is provided herein below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawings are only for the purpose of illustration of certain embodiments of the invention and are an aid for understanding. They are not intended to be a definition of the limits of the invention.
The present invention is directed to methods and apparatus for changing a DC supply voltage applied to a lighting circuit. In embodiments of the present invention, a constant voltage power supply is used to power an LED lighting circuit in which there are uncertainties within the forward voltages of the LEDs, which in turn creates uncertainty with respect to the current level flowing through the LEDs. To manage these uncertainties, the current flowing through the LEDs is measured and an indication of the current level is communicated to a person who can manually adjust the DC voltage supply applied to the LED lighting apparatus by the constant voltage power supply. Alternatively, an automatic adjustment of the DC voltage supply applied to the LED lighting apparatus by the constant voltage power supply can be performed based upon the measured current level.
In some embodiments, as is described with reference to
The channel control transistor 104 is controlled by a Light Channel Control (LCC) signal at its gate/base which dictates when current flows through the LEDs. The LCC signal would generally be a Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) signal that is high and low for periods of time within a duty cycle. The ratio of the time that the LCC signal is high relative to the time that the LCC signal is low dictates the level of light output that would be visible from the LEDs. In particular, if the LCC signal is fully high, the LEDs will be “on” at all times and therefore will project lumens of light 100% of the time. On the other hand, if the LCC signal is 50% high and 50% low, the LEDs will be “on” half the time and therefore the LEDs will dimmed by 50% from the full “on” state. It should be understood that other levels of dimming could be performed by controlling the LCC signal. In some embodiments, the channel control transistor 104 could be removed. In this case, the LEDs 102 would be directly coupled to the current sense circuit 106 and would be always on when the supply voltage is applied.
According to embodiments of the present invention, there are instances that may require a determination of the current flowing through the LEDs 102. The current sense circuit 106 as shown in
The current sense voltage VCS is detected at an Analog to Digital Convertor (ADC) (not shown) or another circuit which may be used to create an indication of the voltage VCS on node N1. To provide an accurate detection of the current sense voltage VCS, it is desired that the signal to noise ratio of the voltage be relatively high. If the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 is substantially low, the voltage VCS will also be low and potentially difficult to accurately detect relative to noise within the circuit. Therefore, to provide an accurate detection of the current sense voltage VCS, it is desirable to have a relatively substantial resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106. On the other hand, the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 is a source of power loss and, the higher that the resistance RCS is and therefore the higher the accuracy of the voltage measurement, the lower the energy efficiency of the overall circuit of
The current sense control transistors 1101,1102 are controlled by a Current Sense Control (CSC) signal at their gates/bases that dictates the resistance across the current sense circuit 106. When the CSC signal is low, the transistors 1101,1102 are off and the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 is equal to the resistance RA of the current sense resistor 108. When the CSC signal is high, the transistors 1101,1102 are on and the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 is:
where R1 and R2 are the resistances of the drain-source or collector-emitter paths of the transistors 1101,1102 respectively when turned on. R1 and R2 are also known as the “on resistance” for the transistors 1101,1102 respectively.
In one particular example implementation, the resistance RA of resistor 108 may be 0.25Ω while the resistances R1,R2 may each be 0.025Ω. In this case, the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 when the transistors 1101,1102 are off would be 0.25Ω while the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 when the transistors 1101,1102 are on would be ˜0.012Ω. In this example, if the current flowing through the current sense circuit 106 is 4.0 A, the power loss when the transistors 1101,1102 are off would be ˜4.0 W while the power loss when the transistors 1101,1102 are on would be ˜0.19 W. This difference in power loss can have a significant difference in the overall energy efficiency of the circuit of
By normally having the current sense control transistors 1101,1102 on and only turning the transistors 1101,1102 off during a limited time for a current sense operation, the overall power loss from the current sense circuit 106 can be minimized. In one implementation, the duty cycle for the circuit of
To ensure that the current sense voltage VCS is in equilibrium and not in a transitional state caused by the turning off of the transistors 1101,1102, in some embodiments, the current sense voltage VCS is measured by the ADC at a later portion of the time that the CSC signal is low. For instance, if a duty cycle is divided into 256 slots and the duty cycle is 1 ms, each slot would comprise ˜3.9 μs. In this case, the detection of the current sense voltage VCS may take place 2-3 μs after the transistors 1101,1102 are turned off. Further, in some embodiments, the measuring of the current sense voltage VCS is performed in a plurality of duty cycles and the overall value is determined by averaging the values detected during the individual duty cycles.
If the values of the resistances RA, R1 and R2 are equal to the sample values 0.25Ω, 0.025Ω and 0.025Ω respectively and the current flowing through the current sense circuit 106 is 4.0 A, then the instantaneous power loss due to the current sense circuit 106 for the slots 9 to 31 of the duty cycle of
Although depicted with two current sense control transistors 1101,1102, it should be understood that there could be only one current sense control transistor or more than two. The number of current sense transistors used depends upon the desired adjustment in resistance within the current sense circuit 106. If only a single current sense control transistor is used, the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 when the CSC signal is high will be higher than the case in which two or more similar transistors are used. Using additional current sense transistors will further reduce the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 when the CSC signal is high, therefore reducing the power loss due to the current sense circuit 106 during this time.
Although a plurality of LEDs 102 is depicted in
Although the current sense circuit 106 of
The light engine 202 according to some embodiments of the present invention is similar to the circuit described herein with reference to
The controller 204 in
As one skilled in the art would understand, the controller 204 can take a number of different forms including a microcontroller programmed with software, firmware, an ASIC, an FPGA, a microprocessor, logical hardware components or other components that can generate digital signals. In one particular embodiment, the controller comprises a microprocessor from Microchip Technologies Inc. of Chandler, Ariz., USA.
The input device 206 may comprise a dimmer (ex. a triac dimmer, a 0-10V Lutron dimmer), an infrared remote control, a computer or any other device that can allow a user to make selections concerning aspects of the lighting apparatus 200. The aspects selected may comprise any one or more of the intensity, the color, the color temperature, tint, etc. In some cases, the input device 206 may comprise sensor devices such as an ambient light sensor, a motion sensor and/or an occupancy sensor. In these cases, the sensors may provide input signals to the controller 204 that affect the LCC signal(s) that the controller 204 transmits to the light engine 202. In some embodiments, the input device 206 may be integrated with another component such as the controller 204 or the encasement 212. In other cases, the lighting apparatus 200 may not have an input device 206. For instance, in one embodiment, variations in the aspects of the light output may be controlled by the controller 204 without external inputs using pre-programmed code. The pre-programmed code could be enabled based on an internal clock, a vibration detection sensor, an internal ambient light sensor, an internal motion sensor, an internal occupancy sensor, or another component that may trigger a change in an aspect of the lighting apparatus 200. Further, the pre-programmed code could be set at the factory to calibrate the color temperature/color of the lighting apparatus 200. Yet further, the lighting apparatus 200 in some embodiments comprises an intensity or color sense component and the pre-programmed code can correct for variations in the intensity, color temperature or color, for example variations may occur over time as LEDs may decrease in intensity at different rates over long time periods on the of months or years of operation.
The AC/DC power supply 208 may comprise a large number of different power supply configurations depending upon the particular application. For instance, the AC/DC power supply 208 should be selected to match the power needs of the light engine 202 and the controller 204 and particularly to the LEDs within the light engine 202 which will utilize the majority of the power. The AC/DC power supply 208 of
One skilled in the art will understand that the optics element 210 and the thermal element (not shown) can be implemented in many different manners depending on the specific technical requirements of the lighting apparatus 200. The optics element 210, according to some embodiments of the present invention, diffuse the light output from the LEDs such that a single color of light is perceivable at an output of the lighting apparatus 200. In one specific example, the optics element 210 comprises a frosted acrylic plate. The thermal element (not shown) may comprise a heat sink, a heat conductive plate or film, heat conductive fins, one or more heat pipes, a fan, a heat removal diaphragm or other elements that can enable flow of heat away from the LEDs.
It should be understood that the lighting apparatus 200 of
According to embodiments of the present invention, the controller 204 of
The controller 204 subsequently, at step 504, receives the current sense voltage VCS. This could be in digital form from an ADC that has converted the analog voltage to a digital form or could be in analog form and the controller 204 performs the conversion. Next, at step 506, the controller 204 calculates the current flowing through the current sense circuit 106 at the time that the current sense voltage VCS was measured. At this time, the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 was equal to the resistance RA of the current sense resistor 108. By dividing the current sense voltage VCS by the known value of the resistance RA, the controller 204 can calculate the current flowing the current sense circuit 106. This calculated current will correspond to the current flowing through the LEDs 102 during the current sense operation, but may not exactly indicate the current flowing through the LEDs during a normal operation in which the current sense transistors 1101,1102 are turned on and the resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 is significantly reduced. At step 508, the controller 204 may adjust the current calculated at step 506 to compensate for the change in resistance RCS across the current sense circuit 106 during normal operation relative to during current sense operation. In some embodiments, step 508 is not performed and the use of the current calculated at step 506 is utilized by the controller 204.
Next, at step 510, according to some embodiments of the present invention, the controller 204 communicates an indication of the current level calculated in one of steps 506 and 508. This communication can take place in a number of manners and, as will be described herein with reference to
In one particular implementation, the controller 204 determines whether the current level calculated is within an acceptable range of values for the current flowing through the LEDs within the light engine 202. If the current level calculated is not within the acceptable range of values, the controller 204 may control the LCC signal to go to a low state for all or substantially all of the time within a duty cycle and therefore effectively turn off the light output from the light engine 202. By doing this, a user can detect this information and interpret it as an indication of the current level. In response, the user can adjust the DCVC signal to correct the DC voltage level output from the AC/DC power supply 208. For instance, the controller 204 may only turn off the light output from the light engine 202 if the current level calculated is above a maximum acceptable level. By doing this, the controller 204 can protect the LEDs within the light engine 202 from excess current issues. The controller 204 can continually check the current level within the light engine 202 even after turning the light output off by selectively turning the LCC signal to a high state and the CSC signal to a low state for a short time period (for example one time slot out of 256 time slots) in each duty cycle or a plurality of duty cycles (ex. one time slot every second). In this example, once the user has adjusted the DCVC signal so that the DC voltage level applied as the supply voltage VDD is lowered to the point where the current level calculated by the controller 204 is below the maximum acceptable level, the controller 204 can control the LCC signal(s) as normal and allow a normal operation for the light output from the lighting apparatus 200 to continue.
In a second implementation, the controller 204 can communicate an indication of the current level in a different manner. For instance, in some embodiments, the controller 204 may control the LCC signal(s) in order to create a visible blinking in the light output from the lighting apparatus 200. The actual value of the current level calculated or an indication of the current level as it relates to an acceptable range of values, can be communicated using a series of flashes that may be of consistent length or alternatively be of different time length (ex. a set of short and long flashes that communicate information using a protocol such as Morse Code). In another variant, the controller 204 may cause the light output from the lighting apparatus to blink if the current level calculated is outside of the acceptable range for the light engine, the length of the blinks indicating to a user the difference between the current level calculated and the acceptable range of currents. For example, as the user adjusts the DCVC signal to move the DC voltage level applied to the light engine 202 towards the correct level, the blinks may decrease in length to indicate that the current level calculated is getting closer to the acceptable range. It should be understood that other techniques to communicate an indication of the current level calculated are possible using adjustments in the light output from the lighting apparatus 200.
In yet another implementation, the controller 204 can communicate an indication of the current level using changes in the light output from the lighting apparatus 200 that are not visible to the human eye. In order to accomplish this, the controller 204 may utilize a number of different modulation techniques including pulse position modulation, frequency modulation or pulse width modulation to generate the LCC signal(s) that in turn control the light output of the lighting apparatus 200. For example, the controller 204 may transmit digital information related to the current level calculated by adjusting the duty cycle utilized or by slightly adjusting the on/off time of the LEDs from duty cycle to duty cycle. The light output from the lighting apparatus 200 can then subsequently be received and interpreted by a separate apparatus as will be described with reference to
It should be noted that the adjustment of the DCVC signal could be accomplished in a number of manners depending upon the particular implementation within the AC/DC power supply 208. In some example implementations, an adjustment in the DCVC signal is triggered by a mechanical adjustment in an element such as a screw, dial, dimmer or other input device. In other implementations, the DCVC signal may be controlled electronically. In embodiments of the present invention related to
As shown, if the current level calculated is not acceptable at step 512, the controller 204 adjusts the DC supply voltage VDD output from the AC/DC power supply 208 by adjusting the DCVC signal. This adjustment may be precisely calculated to result in a current level within the light engine 202 that will be acceptable or alternatively may be an adjustment in the direction towards the current level becoming acceptable. In particular, the controller 204 may determine the level of the adjustment by the difference between the current level calculated and the acceptable range of current levels (or the exact value that is desired). After the adjustment at step 514, the controller 204 may continue to monitor the current level by returning to step 502 and repeating the steps of
Although the embodiments of
Although described as time slots within a duty cycle, it should be understood that the divisions within a duty cycle may be in any segments. For instance, in some embodiments of the present invention, the duty cycle is divided into time segments in μseconds. In other embodiments, the duty cycle is divided into time slots (ex. 256) but the actual number of time slots assigned to a particular operational state may not be an integer. In these cases, the exact selection of the number of time slots may be set by an average of the number of time slots across a plurality of duty cycles.
Although various embodiments of the present invention have been described and illustrated, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications and variations can be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/104,926 entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CHANGING A DC SUPPLY VOLTAGE APPLIED TO A LIGHTING CIRCUIT” by Briggs filed on May 10, 2011 which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/333,747 filed on May 11, 2010 and hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4593234 | Yang | Jun 1986 | A |
5006782 | Pelly | Apr 1991 | A |
5237264 | Moseley et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248919 | Hanna et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5783909 | Hochstein | Jul 1998 | A |
5803579 | Turnbull et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5932995 | Wagoner | Aug 1999 | A |
5949539 | Britton, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6069905 | Davis et al. | May 2000 | A |
6127798 | Lansang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150774 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175195 | Janczak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198230 | Leeb et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222352 | Lenk | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6307331 | Bonasia | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351079 | Willis | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6400482 | Lupton et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426599 | Leeb | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441558 | Muthu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445139 | Marshall et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6495964 | Muthu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504633 | Hovorka et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518561 | Miura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6548967 | Dowling et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6596977 | Muthu et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621235 | Chang | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6794831 | Leeb et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798152 | Rooke et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6853150 | Clauberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6894442 | Lim et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6954591 | Lupton et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7016115 | Leeb et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7141779 | Chew et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7233115 | Lys | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256554 | Lys | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265681 | Chen | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7321203 | Marosek | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7352135 | Shiotsu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7457089 | Ohshima | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7486032 | Lee | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495425 | Friedrich | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498754 | Masood | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511463 | Kumar | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7633577 | Moon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7649326 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7683470 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683504 | Blair et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7750616 | Liu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759881 | Melanson | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7847783 | Liu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8105854 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8193737 | Peker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8232742 | Briggs | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8247975 | Yoo et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8248439 | Ran et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8324834 | Wang et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8358085 | Catalano et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8587203 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8681192 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8766162 | Tanase | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8848202 | Dyer et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8941308 | Briggs | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9089024 | Briggs et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20040119602 | Blum et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040263093 | Matsubayashi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050127888 | Marschalkowski et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156644 | Karnahan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050173924 | French | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199841 | O'Maley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213353 | Lys | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050225264 | Kemp | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050269580 | D'Angelo | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060044800 | Reime | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049782 | Vornsand et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060113975 | Mednik et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060239689 | Ashdown | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070080911 | Liu et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103086 | Neudorf et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103832 | Ohshima | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159421 | Peker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182338 | Shteynberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195552 | Park | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229047 | Sigamani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070267978 | Shteynberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268028 | Moyer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278974 | Van De Ven | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080079705 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088769 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080138085 | Lin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150449 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080180040 | Prendergast et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080191642 | Slot et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224636 | Melanson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238341 | Korcharz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252664 | Huang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272277 | Wei | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090027652 | Chang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090096392 | Chandran et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134817 | Jurngwirth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090160422 | Isobe et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167194 | Mizuta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174337 | Miskin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195168 | Greenfeld | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090195183 | Yang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090251059 | Veltman | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251071 | Gater et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322252 | Shiu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100019692 | Kimura | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033146 | Irissou et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100033150 | Irissou et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046210 | Mathai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060187 | Newman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066266 | Huang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066484 | Hanwright et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072899 | Engstrand | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072902 | Wendt et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079124 | Melanson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100253 | Fausak et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102230 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117450 | Azrai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100156319 | Melanson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164406 | Kost et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171429 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171442 | Draper et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177127 | Akiyama et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194308 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245289 | Svajda | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264834 | Gaines et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277075 | Rees | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289424 | Chang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302477 | Ohmi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320936 | Yao | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320939 | Lai | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006691 | Blaha et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110050130 | Rudolph | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110068703 | McKinney | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086676 | Choi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101950 | Babb | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115394 | Shteynberg et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115412 | Welten | May 2011 | A1 |
20110187313 | Lee | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110193489 | Moss | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110194047 | Bruyneel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110227492 | Du et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110279040 | Briggs et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279048 | Briggs | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279053 | Briggs | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279055 | Briggs | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279057 | Briggs | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298386 | Corradi | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120146519 | Briggs | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120262071 | Briggs | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262076 | Briggs | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268019 | Briggs | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120312956 | Chang et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320626 | Quilici et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130009561 | Briggs | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015774 | Briggs | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130223058 | Briggs | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130293722 | Chen | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130297251 | Engel-Hall et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300316 | Engel-Hall et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201220626 | Apr 2009 | CN |
Entry |
---|
English machine translation of CN201220626Y, Apr. 15, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150327345 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61333747 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13104926 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14804312 | US |