Methods and apparatus for client aggregation of television programming in a networked personal video recording system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8737801
  • Patent Number
    8,737,801
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 15, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 27, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A networked personal video recording (“PVR”) system couples a plurality of clients to one or more PVR media servers over a network. One or more PVR media servers include television tuners to tune television signals. A storage medium buffers the television signals to implement PVR functionality. For example, the PVR media server records television programs for clients. Clients are assigned to television tuners, and the clients display television programs received at the assigned tuner. The network transfers the buffered television signals to the clients.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention is directed toward the field of video recording, and more particularly toward a networked personal video recording system.


2. Art Background


Typically, a personal video recorder (“PVR”) includes a storage device, such as a hard disk drive, and a television input. Similar to a video cassette recorder, the PVR system permits a user to record television programming. Specifically, the PVR system stores a digital representation of television signals on the storage device for subsequent replay by the user. The PVR system also buffers live television. For this application, television signals are stored on the storage device and output to a television for viewing by a user. The function of buffering television permits a user to seemingly manipulate live television. For example, a user may pause, rewind, and, to a limited extent, fast forward the live television signal. Due to the numerous functions and features, PVR systems have become very popular. However, these PVR systems typically operate on a signal television signal for subsequent display on a single television. As such, it is desirable to develop a PVR system that effectively integrates one or more television inputs with a network of televisions.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A personal video recording (“PVR”) system aggregates television programming information from multiple sources. The PVR system includes at least one PVR media server. A network couples a plurality of clients to a PVR media server. The PVR media server tunes television signals in a plurality of tuners. The television signals are buffered in a storage medium. To aggregate television programming information, a client generates a request for a list of television programming from each of the PVR media servers on the network. In response, PVR media servers transmit a list of television programming available through their respective PVR media servers. The requesting client aggregates a list of the television programming information available within the PVR system.


In one embodiment, the PVR system aggregates a list of television programming across a plurality of PVR media servers, a plurality of television tuners, and/or a plurality of television service providers. The television programming information may identify either live television or television programs previously stored on the storage medium. The PVR system aggregates television programming to permit viewing the information by channel, time slots, television show genre, television show episodes, and actors appearing in television shows.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for the networked PVR system of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for the networked PVR system of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of television signal buffering for the networked PVR system.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating on embodiment for a buffer in the networked PVR system.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for viewing video in the networked PVR system.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for using the networked PVR system of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for scheduling events in the networked PVR system of the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for recording programs.



FIG. 9 illustrates client device aggregation of media in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for client media aggregation over a network.



FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for software components operating on a networked PVR system device.



FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an example home network for the networked PVR system.



FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for discovering devices in the networked PVR system.



FIG. 14 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for a data model for elements of a networked PVR system.



FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of accessing a data store through the networked PVR system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for the networked PVR system of the present invention. For this embodiment, a home entertainment system includes “n” clients and “m” personal video recording (“PVR”)-media servers (i.e., “n” and “m” are any integer values greater than or equal to one). A client, as used herein, is any device that plays back media. For example, a client may comprise a television to playback video and live television. A server, as used herein, connotes any device that stores or acquires media. A PVR-media server connotes any device that delivers video to the network, including a device that acquires television signals and buffers television signals for viewing by the clients. For example, a PVR-media server may comprise a device with storage, designed specifically to minimize cost or a PVR-media server may comprise a personal computer.


As shown in FIG. 1, different types of media, including television signals, are input to each PVR-media server. The PVR-media servers may store media, including audio and video, for access by the clients. In addition, the PVR-media servers buffer live television. Each client (e.g., client1, client2 and clientn) may access media stored or buffered on the PVR-media servers via network 110. Network 110 may comprise any type of network, including wireless networks. For example, network 110 may comprise networks implemented in accordance with standards, such as IEEE 802.3, Ethernet 10/100 on Category 5, HPNA, Home Plug, IEEE 802.11x, IEEE 1394, and USB 1.1/2.0.


The networked system 100, shown in FIG. 1, may be implemented in a residence. For example, each client may consist of a television for viewing stored video and television. Such an example home system may include a client television located in the living room, one or more client televisions located in bedrooms, and a client television located in the kitchen. In general, system 100 permits any client to playback media (e.g., video) stored or acquired through any of the PVR-media servers. The PVR-media servers may be configured to acquire television signals from different sources. For example, PVR-media server1 may acquire a television signal from a satellite television system, whereas PVR-media server2 may acquire a television signal from a cable television system. A PVR-media server includes permanent storage (e.g., hard disk drive) and at least one television tuner. Thus, system 100 permits any client to access media from any tuner or media stored on any PVR-media server.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for the networked PVR system of the present invention. Similar to system 100 of FIG. 1, system 200 includes “n” clients, including at least two televisions. For this example system, there are three PVR-media servers (PVR-media server1, PVR-media server2, and PVR-media server3). The clients access media (e.g., video) through network 210. Each PVR-media server includes storage (220, 230 and 240) and “n” tuners (i.e., “n” represents any integer greater than or equal to one). The PVR-media servers receive a television signal. For this example, PVR-media server1 and PVR-media server2 receive a signal from television service provider1, and PVR-media server3 receives a television signal from television service provider2. Under this configuration, any client (i.e., client1, client2, and clientn) may receive an output video signal demodulated by any tuner (i.e., any one of “n” tuners from PVR-media server1, PVR-media server2, and PVR-media server3).



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of television signal buffering for the networked PVR system. Every tuner has a continuous ring buffer. In one embodiment, the size of the ring buffer is flexible, and may be configured. For example, the ring buffer may permit storage of sixty (60) minutes of television. In turn, each client has an independent buffer position for every ring buffer and stored video available in the system. FIG. 3 illustrates an example networked PVR system with “n” tuners. The “n” tuners may be implemented in conjunction with one or more PVR-media servers. As shown in FIG. 3, the output of each tuner is input to a corresponding buffer (e.g., ring buffer). Each client, client1-n, has an associated buffer position for each tuner-buffer pair. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, client1 has buffer positions for tuner1, tuner2, and tunern. Similarly, clientn also has independent buffer positions for tuners 1-n. In general, a buffer position may comprise a pointer to a position within a video or to a position within a tuner buffer. Each tuner buffer position is depicted in FIG. 3 as a timeline, wherein the beginning and end line segments represent the length of the buffer, and the center line segments represent the clients current buffer position.


A buffer in the networked PVR system includes a write tap and a plurality of read taps. FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating on embodiment for a buffer in the networked PVR system. A tuner 410 outputs data (e.g., MPEG encoded video) for storage on buffer 420. In one embodiment, the buffer comprises a hard disk drive. The tuner 410 may write to the hard disk drive using a file system. In other embodiments, the tuner 410 may execute direct write operations on the hard disk drive. The buffer has a plurality of read taps. For the example shown in FIG. 4, the buffer has “n” read taps (i.e., “n” represents any integer greater than or equal to one). Each read tap supports an independent buffer position. For example, read tap1 supports tuner buffer position1, read tap2 supports tuner buffer position2, and read tapn supports tuner buffer positionn. In one software embodiment, the software conducts multiple read operations on a file to generate the multiple taps.


In one embodiment, the system sets boundary conditions on the relative positions of read and write buffer taps. One boundary condition requires that the read tap not fall behind the write tap an amount greater than the buffer length. For example, a client may view a buffered television program using a first buffer position (i.e., read tap). For this example, a client may pause the viewing of the television program. If this occurs, the first buffer position is constant (i.e., the first buffer position is not advanced). However, the write position is advanced as the television signal is received. Therefore, the distant between the write buffer position and the read buffer position is increased. If the difference between the read buffer position and the write buffer position exceeds the length of the buffer, then an event is generated. A response to the event may be to advance the read buffer position. Also, in another scenario, if a read buffer position advances forward to the corresponding write buffer position, then the read buffer position becomes the location of the write buffer position (i.e., the read buffer position does not advance beyond the write buffer position). For example, a client may fast forward a buffer television program up to the current write position.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for viewing video in the networked PVR system. Initially, the user receives a menu option, displayed on a client television, to watch live TV or to select media from a PVR-media server (block 520, FIG. 5). If the client does not elect to watch live television, then the client selects media stored on a PVR-media server (blocks 520 and 530, FIG. 5). Then, as discussed below, the client sets the buffer position through the system. If the user elects to watch live television, then the client selects a television service provider (block 510, FIG. 5). If there is only one television service provider available to the client, then the system eliminates the function of block 510. In one embodiment, the service provider selection may be configured during a set-up mode. For example, the television in the living room may be configured to always receive a television signal from a satellite system. The system selects a tuner for the client (block 540, FIG. 5). In one embodiment, the system automatically allocates, for the client television, an available tuner.


The user views the program at the client (block 580, FIG. 5). If the user desires to change the program, then the client selects programming from the electronic programming guide displayed at the client (blocks 555 and 550, FIG. 5). If the user does not desire to change the program, then the user potentially sets the buffer position. If the user has an existing buffer position and the user desires to set the program to an existing buffer position, then the user selects, through a menu, the existing buffer position (blocks 570 and 572, FIG. 5). If the client does not have an existing buffer position, then the system sets the buffer position to the start of the file/media (blocks 570 and 574, FIG. 5). The user may desire to change the buffer position to an existing buffer position (block 560FIG. 5). If the user desires to set the program to an existing buffer position, the user, through the system, changes the buffer position. (block 565, See FIG. 6). For example, the user may select a program already in progress. Under this scenario, the user may wish to view the program from the beginning. To accomplish this, the user selects a new buffer position to start at the beginning of the program. The user then views the program at the client (block 580, FIG. 5).


In one embodiment, the PVR-media server acquires programming data, referred to as an electronic programming guide (“EPG”), from an EPG content provider. The EPG dataset provides a list of programs, including channels and times, available from the corresponding television service provider. Typically, the EPG data is provided on a service basis from the EPG content provider. The PVR-media server contacts the EPG content provider to acquire updated programming data. The PVR system utilizes the EPG data to schedule programs as well as to provide programming menus to the clients. Thus, for this embodiment, the PVR system scheduler is specific to an EPG data set. However, a home media networked system may include servers that utilize different EPG content providers, and consequently operate using different EPG data sets. For this embodiment, users only view channel selection menus based on the underlying EPG data sets. Thus, the menu presented at the client is dependent upon the underlying PVR-media server.


In one embodiment, the PVR system permits a client to select television programs without requiring the client to understand the notion of a television tuner. For example, two clients may be receiving a signal from the same tuner. Under this scenario, one of the clients may desire to change the channel to view a different program without affecting the ability of the other client to view the current program. The PVR system provides a menu that permits the user to select additional programming. In one embodiment, the programming menu is based on a specific television service provider and corresponding EPG content provider.


In one embodiment, the user selects programming within a television service provider—EPG content data set. A client may set-up the system to automatically select a preferred television service provider. If a user executes an operation that requires a new tuner, the user selects programming from the previously selected EPG content provider. After the user selects a new program, the system allocates a tuner to the user. Under this scenario, the user does not need to understand the notion of a tuner. Instead, the client only selects a program or cancels an event in order to acquire use of a tuner. If a tuner is not available for allocation to the user, then the system resolves conflict through predetermined “conflict management” procedures. One embodiment for resolving certain conflicts that arise in networked PVR systems is described more fully below.


The networked PVR system permits users to select buffer positions from different clients. For example, a user watching a program at a first client (e.g., television in living room) may go to another room and pickup that program from a second client (e.g., television in kitchen) where they left off watching on the first client. Under this scenario, the user may pause the program playing at the living room client for subsequent viewing at the kitchen client. FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for using the networked PVR system of the present invention. For this scenario, the user selects, from a client, a program for viewing (block 610, FIG. 6). The user may then desire to select that program from a different client. To accomplish this, the user queries the PVR system to determine other clients tuned to be selected program (block 620, FIG. 6). If other clients are tuned to the selected program, then the system displays a list of clients tuned to the program (blocks 630 and 640, FIG. 6). For the above scenario, the user may query the PVR system from the client in the kitchen to pickup the program paused in the living room. In one embodiment, the user, from a client, pulls-up a menu item to determine “Who is watching the selected program?” In response, the PVR system displays a menu of client locations currently playing the selected program. For the above example, the PVR system displays the “living room client” to identify that the selected program is currently playing in the living room. Alternatively, if no other clients are tuned to the selected program, then the buffer position is set to the start of the program (blocks 630 and 655, FIG. 6).


If the user desires to select a buffer position of another client, then the PVR system copies a buffer position from the selected client for use as the buffer position for the user's client (blocks 650 and 660, FIG. 6). For the above example, the user, at the kitchen client, selects the buffer position of the living room client, so as to pickup the selected program at the position of the program was paused. Alternatively, the user may desire to view the selected program from the start of the program (blocks 650 and 655, FIG. 6). In one embodiment, the PVR system may synchronize two buffer positions for simultaneous playback at two clients. For example, a user may desire to playback a music video at two different clients so as to play the music over a broader area of the home.


In one embodiment, the PVR system assigns states to television tuners. For this embodiment, a television tuner includes one of the following states: busy, maybe free, and totally free. A busy state indicates that the server is currently recording a program using the tuner. The maybe free state indicates that a client may be viewing a program using the tuner. For example, a user may select to view a program at a client. Thereafter, the PVR system does not actually know whether the user is still viewing the program (e.g., as the user may have just turned off their monitor). Under this scenario, the tuner is designated as “maybe free.” If the tuner is designated as “totally free”, then the tuner was not allocated by the scheduler and a client was not viewing programming with the tuner. As described fully below, the tuners states are used to allocate tuners.


In one embodiment, the PVR system utilizes a scheduler. In general, the scheduler acts as a “to do list” for the system. For example, the scheduler executes a process to record programs selected by system users. The programs may be selected for recording on an individual basis, or the programs may be scheduled for recording based on a subscription. The scheduler resolves issues of conflict management in order to allocate resources to record programs.


In one embodiment, the PVR system supports “subscriptions.” In general, with a subscription, the system records recurring broadcasts of a selected program. Using a subscription, a user need only select the program for subscription to record all occurrences of that program. In one embodiment, the scheduler of a PVR-media server identifies events to fulfill subscriptions. For example, a user may select a subscription to a television show, “Reality Television.” The scheduler of a PVR-media server determines, from the EPG data set, all unique episodes of the television show, “Reality Television.” The scheduler generates events, one event for each unique episode identified, to record the event. In one embodiment, a subscription is scheduled within a single PVR-media server. However, in other embodiments, subscriptions may be pushed to other PVR-media servers. For example, the scheduler of a first PVR-media server may include events pertaining to a subscription. If the first PVR-media server has conflicts with one or more events of the subscription, then an event of the entire subscription may be assigned to a second PVR-media server. If this occurs, the scheduler of the second PVR-media server fulfills the subscription (e.g., in the same manner as the scheduler for the first PVR-media server). For example, events from the scheduler of the first PVR-media server may be transferred to the scheduler of the second PVR-media server. In addition, the scheduler of the second PVR-media server may assume the task of scheduling future events for the subscription. Also, subscriptions may be pushed between PVR-media servers if a PVR-media server is removed from the network.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for scheduling events in the networked PVR system of the present invention. First, a user selects, through a menu, programs to record, either individually or through a subscription (block 710, FIG. 7). In response, the system selects a tuner available during the time slot of the event (block 720, FIG. 7). In addition, the system allocates storage space on the storage medium for the scheduled program (block 730, FIG. 7). If a “re-schedule” of event occurs in the system, the process is repeated to both allocate available tuners and available storage space (blocks 740, 720 and 730, FIG. 7). In one embodiment, a “re-schedule” event occurs when the electronic programming guide data is downloaded to a PVR-media server. A re-schedule event also occurs when a user deletes an item from the scheduler. For example, a user may delete an event to record a program that previously canceled another program from a prior subscription. Under this scenario, the system reschedules the prior subscription because the user canceled the conflicting program.


When the time to set-up the scheduled event has arrived (e.g., a time prior to the time of the scheduled event), the system initiates the process to commence recording of the scheduled event (blocks 750 and 760, FIG. 7). One embodiment for recording a scheduled event, including resolving conflicts of tuner resources, is described fully below in conjunction with a description of FIG. 8. If the event is canceled, then the system frees a tuner and de-allocates space on the storage medium for the cancelled event (blocks 770 and 775, FIG. 7). Also, the scheduler is run to determine any new allocations to fill the slot (block 785, FIG. 7). In one embodiment, the system also permits the user to re-schedule, instead of cancel, the event. Alternatively, if the event is not canceled, then the scheduled event is recorded (blocks 770 and 780, FIG. 7).


In one embodiment, the PVR system assigns equal ownership to all clients using a tuner. For example, three clients may be utilizing the same tuner (i.e., all three clients are viewing the same program although potentially at different portions of the program). If one client changes the channel of the tuner, then the tuner is set to the new the channel, and consequently all three clients are tuned to the new program.


The PVR system resolves several conflicts that may occur in a networked PVR system (i.e., referred to as “conflict management”). Some conflicts that arise in a networked PVR system include: inadequate storage space to record new programs; an insufficient number of tuners to record scheduled programming; inconsistent input, including requests to change the channel when recording a scheduled event; and an insufficient number of tuners to record events.


In one embodiment, if a PVR-media server has insufficient storage space to record a scheduled event, then the system automatically deletes content prior to recording. One embodiment to assign priority for content deletion is described more fully below.



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for recording programs. Just prior to the time of a scheduled event, the PVR system determines whether a tuner is available (blocks 810 and 820, FIG. 8). If a tuner is available (i.e., the tuner is designated as “totally free”), then the tuner is assigned to record the program (blocks 820 and 880, FIG. 8). If no tuners are designated “totally free” on the PVR-media server, then the system determines whether there are any other PVR-media servers with tuners (block 822, FIG. 8). If so, another PVR-media server is selected, and the system determines whether the selected PVR-media server has an available tuner (blocks 825 and 820, FIG. 8). This process is repeated for all PVR-media servers on the network.


If a tuner is not available (i.e., all tuners on the network are designated as either “busy” or “maybe free”), then the system queries the clients allocated or potentially allocated to the tuners to determine whether the clients desire to cancel the scheduled event (block 830, FIG. 8). For example, in one embodiment, to query the clients, the PVR system displays a menu screen on each client asking whether the system should proceed with the scheduled event. All clients allocated to the tuner receive the inquiry. For example, the screen display may ask “System needs to change the channel to record program X at time Y, is this OK?” If all of the client responses are yes to the inquiry, then the system proceeds to record the scheduled event. If a client does not answer the inquiry in a predetermined amount of time, then the system also proceeds to record the scheduled event.


The PVR system retrieves the responses from the clients (block 840, FIG. 8). If any one of the clients cancels the event, then the system determines whether there are additional PVR-media servers with tuners to allocate to record the scheduled event (blocks 850 and 860, FIG. 8). If there are no more additional PVR-media servers, then the scheduled event is canceled (blocks 860 and 870, FIG. 8). Alternatively, if there are additional PVR-media servers in the system, then the process is repeated to allocate available tuners (blocks 860, 820, 830, 840, and 850, FIG. 8). This process to assign tuners is repeated for all PVR-media servers in the system.


The process of FIG. 8 may be used to allocate tuners for multiple events scheduled at the same time. For example, three programs may be scheduled for recording at an instance in time. The process is repeated for each of the programs. For example, if a client cancels the first scheduled program, then that program is pushed to, if available, another PVR-media server in the system. Then, all the relevant clients receive another inquiry with regard to the scheduling of the second program. Again, if anyone of the clients cancel the second program, the scheduling of the second program is potentially shifted to another PVR-media server.


In one embodiment, the PVR networked system has the ability for the user to “lock a tuner.” For example, if a user is watching a TV show that spans several hours (e.g. baseball game, academy awards, etc.), then the user may not want to receive multiple requests to change the channel to a previously scheduled event. In one embodiment, the user may select an option in the system to bypass the inquiry to change the channel. When enabled, the system does not display the inquiry to re-allocate the tuner to resolve tuner resource conflicts during the user's program.


In one embodiment, the networked PVR system includes advanced conflict management. In general, advanced conflict management aids the user to resolve conflicts using means other then querying the user to cancel scheduled events. For example, an advanced conflict manager may automatically seek out alternate presentations of identical television episodes, and present to the user an option for the system to record the program when a conflict does not arise. Thus, if a user attempts to record two shows simultaneously, the system may return a message stating that “The episode of “Your Favorite Show”, set to record at 9 pm on channel 4, is now set to record at 11 pm on channel 7.”


A user may attempt to change a channel on a tuner currently recording a scheduled event. Under this scenario, the system prompts the user to cancel the scheduled event. Also, a user may attempt to record a program when there are no more available tuners in the system. Under this scenario, the user receives a list, from the entire network, of events to cancel. For example, a system may have three tuners. A first tuner may be recording a first scheduled event, a second tuner may be recording a second scheduled event, and a third tuner may be allocated for use by at least one client. If the user attempts to record another program, the system displays the three programs currently allocated to the three tuners. In response, if the user still wants to record the new program, the user cancels one of the events displayed.


In one embodiment, the PVR system includes a “deletion manager.” In general, a deletion manager determines the priority to delete content stored in the PVR-media servers. In one embodiment, the deletion manager utilizes a date based deletion system. Under a date based deletion system, the first recorded program is also the first program scheduled for deletion. After a predetermined amount of time, an item is tagged on a menu to inform the user that the program may be deleted. Additional icons may be used to inform the user concerning potential deletion of programs. For example, another icon may be used to inform the user that the item may be deleted, and a different icon may be used to inform the user that the program will not be deleted.


In one embodiment, the deletion manager uses a priority system based on “sooner” or “later” flags. Under this system, the user marks content for deletion “sooner” or “later.” The deletion manager analyzes content to delete items marked “sooner” before items marked “later.” This system may be used in conjunction with the date based deletion system described above. In another embodiment, the user ranks content for a priority of deletion in accordance with a range (e.g., 1-5).


Client Device Aggregation:


The networked PVR system utilizes a “peer-to-peer” architecture. All client devices on the media platform have the ability to communicate with other devices, including multiple client devices and multiple PVR-media servers. This architecture permits a device to obtain all media, including television signals, available on the network and to aggregate the media for presentation on that device.


A device, including a client device or a server device, may enter and/or exit the home network, at any time, and still maintain full functionality. Thus, when a device is powered off, other devices automatically recognize that the device is no longer available on the home network. When a new device is added or a portable device comes onto the network, the other nodes automatically recognize the new devices. The other nodes may utilize the services on the added device. A new PVR-media server may also automatically recognize new devices, as long as at least one other PVR-media server is currently on the network.



FIG. 9 illustrates client device aggregation of television signals in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. For this example, three PVR-media servers (910, 920, and 930) are coupled to home network 940. As shown in FIG. 9, each PVR-media server has at least one tuner. For example, PVR-media server 930 has three tuners (932, 934 and 936). In addition, the PVR-media servers may store various media items (e.g., video, audio, photos, etc). Also, for this example, client device 950 resides on the home media network 940. Client device 950 may comprise a television.


After completing a discovery process, client device 950 determines programming available on home network 940. Thus, client device 950 aggregates programming from all tuners for use at client device 950. As shown in FIG. 9, client device 950 aggregates all programming available through PVR-media servers 910, 920 and 930.


The networked PVR system provides the capability to identify all programming as unique. For example, all programming classified under the genre “comedy” is recognized as such, and the system displays them accordingly. Two or more actors may have the same name. The networked PVR system utilizes a distributed database that allows the system to distinguish among unique programs. Thus, if a program is offered over two different television service providers, then during client device aggregation, the client device recognizes only a single program. For the example of FIG. 9, the movie, “Greatest American Movie”, is offered through both PVR-media server 920 and PVR-media server 910. During client programming aggregation, client device 950 recognizes the movie, “Greatest American Movie”, offered through both PVR-media servers 910 and 920, as the same program. Thus, client device 350 only recognizes the movie, “Greatest American Movie”, as a single program.


The underlying protocols alone do not permit a client device to aggregate programming from devices on the home network. The protocols themselves have no requirement to support a distributed system. For this embodiment of the networked PVR system, aggregation logic creates a distributed system using non-distributed protocols. The aggregation logic uses multiple protocols to integrate devices on the home network.



FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for client aggregation of programs over a network. Initially, a client device discovers devices (e.g., PVR-media servers) on the home network (block 1010, FIG. 10). One embodiment for discovering devices on the home network is described more fully below. Based on information learned in the discovery process, the client device constructs state information for the discovered devices (block 420, FIG. 10). The client device receives a request for media items (block 430, FIG. 10). The aggregation logic receives requests from software components operating above the aggregation logic. For example, the client device may comprise a television operating a user interface. A user may request, using a remote control device, a list of all television programs, either live or pre-recorded, available on the home network. For this example, application logic on the user interface translates the request for programs, and forwards the request to the aggregation logic.


The aggregation logic for the client device acquires programming information from all PVR-media servers that provide the selected programs. For example, if the client requests television programs from a specific genre (e.g., comedy), then the client device acquires all programs classified in that genre available from all PVR-media servers. This operation is illustrated in FIG. 10 (blocks 1040, 1050, 1060, 1070 and 1080). Specifically, an identifier (i.e., n=0) to select a specific PVR-media server is set (block 440, FIG. 10). The client device connects to a selected PVR-media server (e.g., PVR-media server[0]) using state information acquired during the discovery process (block 1050, FIG. 10). Specifically, the client device translates the request for programming to a protocol supported by the selected PVR-media server, and forwards the request to the PVR-media server. In one embodiment, the client device invokes a service on the selected PVR-media server to obtain the programming (block 1060, FIG. 10). In one embodiment, the client device invokes a content manager service on the PVR-media server to acquire a list of programs available. If there are more PVR-media servers available on the home network, the client device identifies a new PVR-media server to acquire programming (blocks 1070 and 1080, FIG. 10). When the client device has acquired a list of programming from all the available PVR-media servers, the process is complete.



FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for software components operating on a networked PVR system device. Software components 500 include, at the highest level, application software 502. The application software 502 implements functionality for an underlying device. For example, application software 502 may implement functions for a DVD player. As shown in FIG. 11, underneath the application software 502 is aggregation logic 520. As discussed above, aggregation logic 520 permits a client device to aggregate media items and television programming on the home network.


The software components 500 also include user interface (“UI”) rendering logic 510. UI rendering component 510 translates scene information to display information suitable for display on the client device. The UI rendering component 510 also renders the display data. For example, if the underlying client device includes a television display (e.g., CRT), then UI rendering engine 510 generates graphics data from scene information, and renders the graphics data on the television display.


As shown in FIG. 11, the client device incorporates one or more network protocols and remote procedure calls (“RPC”) mechanisms. For example, FIG. 11 shows that the client device supports network protocolA (1125), network protocolB (1130), and network protocoln (1135). For this example, client device software 500 supports RPC mechanismA (1140), RPC mechanismB (1145), and RPC mechanismn (1150).


The client device software 500 supports one or more services. As shown in FIG. 11, one or more methods of a service are accessible through an interface. In general, the methods, when invoked, provide specific functionality for the underlying service. For this example, client device software 500 includes serviceA (555), serviceB (560), and servicen (565). Each service is associated with one or more methods (i.e., method(1)-method(n)).


In one embodiment, the networked PVR system supports a plurality of underlying protocols. In general, the protocols define commands, RPC mechanisms, and interfaces to services. In one embodiment, the networked PVR system supports an industry defined UPnP protocol. In general, the UPnP protocol defines discovery over IP networks, an RPC mechanism, and interfaces for activating services. UPnP services include: a content directory service, a connection manager service, an audio/video (“A/V”) transport service and an A/V control service.


In one embodiment, the networked PVR system also supports a proprietary protocol (i.e., non-industry standard protocol). For this embodiment, the proprietary protocol defines a network discovery process, an RPC mechanism, and an interface to services. The services include a content manager, a media player service, and a PVR control interface. The content manager service allows a client device to interface to a database. Specifically, using the content manager service, the client device may extract information (e.g., URL to identify media, metadata, etc.) from a database on another network device. Thus, the content manager service provides a means for a device of the networked PVR system to query a database. The media player service defines an interface to permit playback functionality (e.g., initiate and control media streams). The PVR control interface enables streaming media on a non-stored object. In addition, the PVR control interface permits a user to record current programming as well as schedule recording of future programming.


In one embodiment, the discovery process on the proprietary protocol implements asynchronous based messaging. The discovery protocol operates on any network that supports packet based messaging or on a serialized network. In one embodiment, the discovery protocol includes an “announce” command, a “discovery” command, and a “bye-bye” command. The announce command is used by a device to announce its presence on the home media network. A discovery command is a request for an announcement (i.e., queries whether any client devices are on the home network). The “bye-bye” command is used by a client device to announce that the client device is leaving the network. In one embodiment, there are two types of announcements and two types of “bye-bye” commands: one for devices and one for services.


In one embodiment, the RPC mechanism, supported by the proprietary protocol, uses a packet-based protocol. The services include methods and an identification number to permit a device on the home network to construct RPC based packets with the appropriate arguments. In general, an RPC mechanism permits a device to control another device on the network. The protocol is effectuated through requests and responses. The RPC packets include a header. In one embodiment, the header contains: version information, a command class (maps to a particular service), the command (the method the device is requesting or the response coming from the method), an identification (identification of requests or identification of responses corresponding to a request), and a length. After the header, the RPC protocol format specifies data (i.e., arguments for requests and returns values for responses).



FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an example home network for the networked PVR system. For this example, a home network includes PVR-media server 1250, DVD player 1240, and PVR-media server 1230. A client device (1210), which includes a television, enters the home network 620, and discovers, using a supporting protocol, three devices (e.g., PVR-media server 1250, DVD player 1240, and PVR-media server 1230). As shown in FIG. 12, client device 1210 stores state information for each of the devices discovered on home network 1220. Specifically, client device 1210 stores, for device1 (PVR-media server 1230) a supporting network protocol (i.e., network protocolA) as well as a list of services supported by the devices (i.e., serviceA and serviceC). The network protocol also specifies an RPC mechanism to execute remote procedure calls on PVR-media server 1230. Similarly, state information for device2 (i.e., DVD player 1240) indicates that device2 supports network protocolA and implements serviceA and serviceB. Device3, PVR-media server 1250, supports network protocolC, and implements serviceA and serviceB.


As shown in FIG. 12, each service (e.g., serviceA, serviceB, and serviceC) supports an interface. The interface defines a specification to provide a means to access the methods or commands within a service. As such, the client device 1210 utilizes services (serviceA or serviceB) on PVR-media server 1250 through their respective interfaces. Note that PVR-media server 1230, DVD player 1240 and PVR-server 1250 all implement serviceA. Each interface for serviceA is the same to permit uniform accessibility to the service. However, the implementation of serviceA in each of the devices may be different.


In one embodiment, a networked PVR system implementation provides security. For this embodiment, the announcement command is open ended, such that the protocol only defines a minimum specification for communication. Thus, announcement protocols may support multiple network specifications, including TCP and secure sockets layer (“SSL”). The protocol supports implementation on TCP/IP networks. In addition, the protocol supports SSL operating on TCP/IP networks. SSL permits secure communications, including authentication, between two parties on a network.


The proprietary protocol also permits an implementation using partial security. For this embodiment, a service may include some methods that require secure communications and other methods that do not require secure communications. Thus, some methods utilize SSL technology to realize secure communications between two devices on the home network.


Discovery:



FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment for discovering devices in the networked PVR system. A new device (i.e., a device not currently connected to the network) is connected to the home media network (block 1310, FIG. 13). In order to communicate on the network, the new device obtains a network address (block 1320, FIG. 13). For example, in an IP network, the client requires an IP address. If the underlying network supports TCP/IP, then the client device determines if there is a DHCP server. If so, the DHCP server assigns the IP address to the new device. If not (i.e., the DHCP server is not available to assign the new device an IP address), then the new device selects an IP address from a pool and determines whether any other device on the home network has that IP address. If no other device on the network has that IP address, then the client device uses this IP address. This process of auto IP addressing allows communication on a home network within a single subnet.


The new device transmits an “announcement” command over the network (block 1330, FIG. 13). The format of the announcement command complies with a protocol supported by the devices. The new device may broadcast or multicast the announcement command over the network. For example, in an IP network, the new device may multicast the announcement in order to expand subnets if the home network includes a gateway. A multicast format is used to specify specific IP addresses (e.g., transmitting an announcement only to those devices on the network interested or compatible with the new device). As used herein, compatible devices are those devices that may be interested in communicating with the client device.


In response to the new device's announcement command, the new device constructs state information. In general, the state information provides details regarding devices available on the network. The state information includes protocols and services supported by those devices. When compatible devices on the network receive the announcement command, those compatible devices may add information, encapsulated in the announcement command, to a local cache.


If there are no compatible devices on the network or the new device does not desire to utilize a service on the network, then the process terminates. For example, if the new device is a television, then compatible devices include those PVR-media servers storing video (e.g., DVD, MPEG, etc.) as well as providing live or pre-recorded television. If there are other compatible devices on the network, those devices expose one or more services to the new device (block 1350, FIG. 13). To discovery services on the network, the new device transmits a discovery command and waits for a response. For this example, a PVR-media server, which provides live television, exposes an interface to allow the new device to aggregate programming provided by the PVR-media server (e.g., programming provided by a television service provider).


In response to the request (e.g., new device application logic), the new device connects to a compatible device via a supporting protocol (block 760, FIG. 13). Specifically, the device translates the protocol for the appropriate device using the state information. For example, if the compatible device supports an industry standard protocol, then the new device selects the industry standard protocol to communicate to that device. The new device utilizes the services on the compatible device (block 1370, FIG. 13).


A PVR-media server entering a home network is one example of the discovery process. For this example, the PVR-media server, after obtaining a network address, transmits an announcement command over the network. The PVR-media server announces the services it supports (e.g., content manager, media player service and PVR control interface), and exposes interfaces to network clients to permit access to those services. If a device enters the network, the device waits for an announcement from the server. When the client identifies the PVR-media server, the client connects to the PVR-media server via a protocol the server specified in the announcement command. This process allows the client device to navigate media and programming on the PVR-media server. Using the supporting protocol, the client device connects to a playback device (e.g., television), either itself or another playback device, and instructs the playback device to play the program that a user selected from programming available on the PVR-media server.


Networked PVR Data Model:


The networked PVR system operates in conjunction with a data model. The format and arrangement of underlying database is not defined by the networked PVR system. In the data model, objects (e.g., media items) have unique identifications in the database. The objects also have an associated “type” (e.g., channels, time slots, episodes, and shows). The data model defines relationships to define structure and hierarchy among objects and types.



FIG. 14 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for a data model for elements of a networked PVR system. For this embodiment, many service providers are mapped to a single MSO package. In general, the MSO package defines data (e.g., time, channel, content, etc.) for television programming. Data is extracted to map the MSO package to channels. The channels data object defines all channels available. As shown in FIG. 14, each channel maps to multiple time slots. An episode data object is mapped to one or more time slots. The episode data object identifies each individual episode of a program. In turn, the episode data object maps to one or more episodes to a show. An actors data object is mapped to each episode to identify actors. Also, a genres data object is used to classify shows in genres (e.g., comedy, drama, action, sports, etc.).


In one embodiment, the database for the networked PVR system comprises a relational database (e.g., key value pair database or standard query language (“SQL”) database). For this embodiment, the database maps objects for storage in the relational database. Although one embodiment of the networked PVR system utilizes a relational database, other databases may be used without deviating from the spirit or scope of the invention.



FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of accessing a data store in the networked PVR system. A client device 1510 is connected to a home network 1520. As shown in FIG. 15, device 1530 and device 1540 are also coupled to home network 1520. Device 1540 includes a persistent data store, labeled Database B in FIG. 15. Similarly, device 1530 includes a persistent data store, Database A. Device 1530 and 1540 support a service that permits access to information in the persistent data stores. In one embodiment, the content manager service is used. Specifically, a first implementation of the content manager serviceA supports access to Database A, and a second implementation of the content manager serviceB supports access to Database B.


Client device 1510 may obtain information from Database A and Database B. To query Database B, client device 1510 obtains a connection with device 1540 in a manner as described above. The client device 1510 invokes methods via an interface on content manager serviceB. For example, client device 1510 may desire to obtain a list of all genres recognized by the networked PVR system. This information may be stored in database B. Client device 1510 generates a request using data model parameters specified in the interface for content manager serviceB. For the example above, client device 1510 generates a request to content manager serviceB to identify all objects with the type “genre.” In response to the request, client manager serviceB translates the data model notion of “genre” to a query compatible with Database B. For example, if Database B supports SQL, then content manager serviceB generates a SQL request to Database B to obtain all records in a table with the type “genre.”


The implementation of the content manager service performs the translation from the networked PVR system data model to an underlying database implementation. For the example in FIG. 15, the content manager serviceA supports a first translation to Database A, and the content manager serviceB supports a second translation for requests for data stored in Database B. Accordingly, client device 1510 uses the same request, as defined by the interface on both content manager services, to access different database implementations (e.g., Database A and Database B).


In one embodiment, the networked PVR system is implemented using a database. In general, the database stores objects, attributes associated with those objects, and associations between those objects. For example, the database stores an identification of television programs available within the media space. The database stores a plurality of attributes, so as to associate one or more attributes for each object. In one embodiment, the objects include. Thus, a track may be associated with one or more albums, one or more artists, one or more genres, and one or more playlists. Attributes include titles, creation dates, and multiple associated media files. Thus, a track may have associated album art, lyrics, etc.


The networked PVR system database permits classifying audio tracks in an extremely versatile manner. For example, a user may desire to classify a track or album (i.e., collection of tracks) in more than one genre because the user associates the music with two different types of genres (e.g., rock and blues). Also, a musical track may be a result of a collaboration between two artists. To properly classify the track, a user of the networked PVR system may associate the track with two different artists. As illustrated by the above examples, the networked PVR system provides minimum flexibility in classifying and organizing music.


The networked PVR system handles each classification or item as a distinct object. For example, for the music jukeb13 application, playlists, genres, artists, albums, and tracks are all handled as individual objects. This feature, which supports independent objects for organization and classification of items, provides minimum flexibility in organizing and classifying music. For example, the user may create nested playlists, such that a first playlist may be wholly contained within a second playlist. Prior art music systems only deal with playlists by tracks. For these prior art systems, a playlist only consists of tracks. In the networked PVR system, playlists may comprise any “objects.” Therefore, playlists may be created from one or more artists, genres, albums or other playlists.


The use of objects in organizing and playing music also permits artists with the same name to be treated differently. Prior art digital music systems store metadata to identify artists. If a user executes a search on the metadata using these prior art systems, there is no way for the system to differentiate among artists with the same name. In the networked PVR system, each artist is treated as an object. Thus, two artists with the same name are two distinct objects, and may be manipulated as two separate artists.


The networked PVR system utilizes distributed iterators. A response to a query to a database may generate a huge amount of data. In one embodiment, the networked PVR system protocol supports transmitting a portion of the data, and maintaining a pointer to identify the data that has been sent. In one embodiment, the protocol uses iterators. The use of iterators by the networked PVR system allows the system to track a portion of data (e.g., a list) transferred from one device to another device. The iterator is implemented such that the iterator dynamically changes if items in the database change during transfer of the data. In general, the iterator specifies a position in an array. A list is a result from the database. For example, the response to a query to a database may produce a list of audio tracks. Subsequently, an audio track, extracted as part of the example query, may be deleted. In another scenario, an audio track, specified by the query, may be added to the database.


If the networked PVR system is implemented using the proprietary protocol and a TCP/IP network, the system associates state with the request for database information. This state information is utilized to maintain iterator information.


Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific exemplary embodiments, it will be appreciated that various modifications and alterations might be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for aggregating television programming in a personal video recording (“PVR”) system, said method comprising the steps of: transmitting a request from a client device for a list of television programming available from a media server on a network, wherein the media server is configured to: receive a plurality of television signals;tune to each of the plurality of television signals using a respective tuner of a plurality of tuners, wherein each of the plurality of tuners has an associated continuous ring buffer; andstore each of the plurality of television signals in a continuous ring buffer associated with a respective tuner of the signal;receiving, from the media server, a list of television programming available through the media server; andaggregating, at the client device, a list of television programming information available from the media server based on the received list.
  • 2. The method as set forth in claim 1, further comprising the step of receiving the stored television signals from the media server, so as to display television programs of said television signals at the client device.
  • 3. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of transmitting a request for a list of television programming is responsive to discovering the media server on said network.
  • 4. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming across a plurality of media servers.
  • 5. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming across at least one media server comprising a plurality of television tuners.
  • 6. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming across a plurality of television service providers.
  • 7. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said television programming comprises buffered live television.
  • 8. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said television programming comprises television programming previously stored on a storage medium.
  • 9. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system further comprises the step of determining whether television programming is unique from other television programming.
  • 10. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by channel.
  • 11. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by time slots.
  • 12. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by television shows.
  • 13. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by genre.
  • 14. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by television show episodes.
  • 15. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by actors appearing in television shows.
  • 16. A non-transitory computer readable medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the computer, causes the computer to perform the step of: transmitting a request from a client device for a list of television program available from a media server on a network, wherein the media server is configured to:receive a plurality of television signals;tune to each of the plurality of television signals using a respective tuner of a plurality of tuners, wherein each of the plurality of tuners has an associated continuous ring buffer; andstore each of the plurality of television signals in a continuous ring buffer associated with a respective tuner of the signal;receiving, from the media server, a list of television programming available through the media server; andaggregating, at the client device, a list of television programming information available from the media server based on the received list.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, further comprising the step of receiving the stored television signals from the media server, so as to display television programs of said television signals at said clients.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of transmitting a request for a list of television programming is responsive to discovering the media server.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming across a plurality of media servers.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming across at least one media server comprising a plurality of television tuners.
  • 21. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming across a plurality of television service providers.
  • 22. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein said television programming comprises buffered live television.
  • 23. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein said television programming comprises television programming previously stored on a storage medium.
  • 24. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of determining whether television programming is unique from other television programming.
  • 25. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by channel.
  • 26. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by time slots.
  • 27. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by television show.
  • 28. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by genre.
  • 29. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by television show episodes.
  • 30. The non-transitory computer readable medium as set forth in claim 16, wherein the step of aggregating a list of television programming available on said PVR system comprises the step of aggregating a list of television programming by actors appearing in television shows.
  • 31. A personal video recording (“PVR”) system comprising: a client device configured to: transmit a request from a client device for a list of television programming available from a media server on a network, wherein the media server is configured to: receive a plurality of television signals;tune to each of the television signals using a respective tuner of a plurality of tuners, wherein each of the plurality of tuners has an associated continuous ring buffer; andstore each of the plurality of television signals in a continuous ring buffer associated with a respective tuner of the signal;receive, from the media server, a list of television programming available through the media server; andaggregate, at the client device, a list of television programming information available from the media server based on the received list.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application claims benefit to and is a continuation of the United States patent application entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CLIENT AGGREGATION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMING IN A NETWORKED PERSONAL VIDEO RECORDING SYSTEM,” having Ser. No. 10/613,400, filed on Jul. 2, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,454,120.

US Referenced Citations (423)
Number Name Date Kind
4063220 Metcalfe et al. Dec 1977 A
4079419 Siegle et al. Mar 1978 A
4081754 Jackson Mar 1978 A
4193120 Yello Mar 1980 A
4206483 Nakamura Jun 1980 A
4264924 Freeman Apr 1981 A
4264925 Freeman et al. Apr 1981 A
4267563 Sato et al. May 1981 A
4305101 Yarbrough et al. Dec 1981 A
4310924 Miyasaka et al. Jan 1982 A
4325081 Abe et al. Apr 1982 A
4334242 Marigold Jun 1982 A
4355415 George et al. Oct 1982 A
4390901 Keiser Jun 1983 A
4429385 Cichelli et al. Jan 1984 A
4435842 Mayumi et al. Mar 1984 A
4449249 Price May 1984 A
4475153 Kihara et al. Oct 1984 A
4488179 Kruger et al. Dec 1984 A
4519003 Scholz May 1985 A
4573072 Freeman Feb 1986 A
4593414 Koyanagi Jun 1986 A
4598288 Yarbrough et al. Jul 1986 A
4602279 Freeman Jul 1986 A
4605964 Chard Aug 1986 A
4605973 Von Kohorn Aug 1986 A
4621259 Schepers et al. Nov 1986 A
4625080 Scott Nov 1986 A
4631601 Brugliera et al. Dec 1986 A
4635121 Hoffman et al. Jan 1987 A
4641205 Beyers, Jr. Feb 1987 A
4694490 Harvey et al. Sep 1987 A
4706121 Young Nov 1987 A
4718107 Hayes Jan 1988 A
4751578 Reiter et al. Jun 1988 A
4755883 Uehira Jul 1988 A
4832373 Swan May 1989 A
4843482 Hegendorfer Jun 1989 A
4847698 Freeman Jul 1989 A
4847700 Freeman Jul 1989 A
4857999 Welsh Aug 1989 A
4879611 Fukui et al. Nov 1989 A
4885579 Sandbank Dec 1989 A
4899370 Kameo et al. Feb 1990 A
4908707 Kinghorn Mar 1990 A
4908713 Levine Mar 1990 A
4930158 Vogel May 1990 A
4945563 Horton et al. Jul 1990 A
4959720 Duffield et al. Sep 1990 A
4977455 Young Dec 1990 A
5036314 Barillari et al. Jul 1991 A
5038211 Hallenbeck Aug 1991 A
5047867 Strubbe et al. Sep 1991 A
5068733 Bennett Nov 1991 A
5105184 Pirani et al. Apr 1992 A
5109279 Ando Apr 1992 A
5134719 Mankovitz Jul 1992 A
5151789 Young Sep 1992 A
5155591 Wachob Oct 1992 A
5172413 Bradley et al. Dec 1992 A
5187589 Kono et al. Feb 1993 A
5195134 Inoue Mar 1993 A
5200822 Bronfin et al. Apr 1993 A
5210611 Yee et al. May 1993 A
5223924 Strubbe Jun 1993 A
RE34340 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5233423 Jernigan et al. Aug 1993 A
5241428 Goldwasser et al. Aug 1993 A
5253066 Vogel Oct 1993 A
5285284 Takashima et al. Feb 1994 A
5296931 Na Mar 1994 A
5323234 Kawasaki Jun 1994 A
5325183 Rhee Jun 1994 A
5335277 Harvey et al. Aug 1994 A
5353121 Young et al. Oct 1994 A
5371551 Logan et al. Dec 1994 A
5398074 Duffield et al. Mar 1995 A
5410344 Graves et al. Apr 1995 A
5412720 Hoarty May 1995 A
5414455 Hooper et al. May 1995 A
5416508 Sakuma et al. May 1995 A
5432561 Strubbe Jul 1995 A
5434626 Hayashi et al. Jul 1995 A
5440678 Eisen et al. Aug 1995 A
5442389 Blahut et al. Aug 1995 A
5452012 Saitoh Sep 1995 A
5459522 Pint Oct 1995 A
5461415 Wolf et al. Oct 1995 A
5469206 Strubbe et al. Nov 1995 A
5479266 Young et al. Dec 1995 A
5479268 Young et al. Dec 1995 A
5479302 Haines Dec 1995 A
5479497 Kovarik Dec 1995 A
5483278 Strubbe et al. Jan 1996 A
5485197 Hoarty Jan 1996 A
5485219 Woo Jan 1996 A
5488409 Yuen et al. Jan 1996 A
5517254 Monta et al. May 1996 A
5517257 Dunn et al. May 1996 A
5523794 Mankovitz et al. Jun 1996 A
5523796 Marshall et al. Jun 1996 A
5524195 Clanton, III et al. Jun 1996 A
5528304 Cherrick et al. Jun 1996 A
5532754 Young et al. Jul 1996 A
5534911 Levitan Jul 1996 A
5537141 Harper et al. Jul 1996 A
5539449 Blahut et al. Jul 1996 A
5539822 Lett Jul 1996 A
5541662 Adams et al. Jul 1996 A
5541738 Mankovitz Jul 1996 A
5543852 Yuen et al. Aug 1996 A
5543929 Mankovitz et al. Aug 1996 A
5550576 Klosterman Aug 1996 A
5557338 Maze et al. Sep 1996 A
5559548 Davis et al. Sep 1996 A
5559549 Hendricks et al. Sep 1996 A
5559550 Mankovitz Sep 1996 A
5568272 Levine Oct 1996 A
5581614 Ng et al. Dec 1996 A
5583560 Florin et al. Dec 1996 A
5583561 Baker et al. Dec 1996 A
5583563 Wanderscheid et al. Dec 1996 A
5583653 Timmernians Dec 1996 A
5585838 Lawler et al. Dec 1996 A
5585858 Harper et al. Dec 1996 A
5585866 Miller et al. Dec 1996 A
5589892 Knee et al. Dec 1996 A
5592551 Lett et al. Jan 1997 A
5592571 Peters et al. Jan 1997 A
5594509 Florin et al. Jan 1997 A
5600364 Hendricks et al. Feb 1997 A
5602582 Wanderscheid et al. Feb 1997 A
5606374 Bertram Feb 1997 A
5617565 Augenbraun et al. Apr 1997 A
5619274 Roop et al. Apr 1997 A
5621456 Florin et al. Apr 1997 A
5621579 Yuen Apr 1997 A
5629733 Youman et al. May 1997 A
5630067 Kindell et al. May 1997 A
5630119 Aristides et al. May 1997 A
5631995 Weissensteiner et al. May 1997 A
5632007 Freeman May 1997 A
5635978 Alten et al. Jun 1997 A
5635989 Rothmuller Jun 1997 A
5648824 Dunn et al. Jul 1997 A
5650826 Eitz Jul 1997 A
5650831 Farwell Jul 1997 A
5652613 Lazarus et al. Jul 1997 A
5652615 Bryant et al. Jul 1997 A
5654748 Matthews, III Aug 1997 A
5654886 Zereski, Jr. et al. Aug 1997 A
5657072 Aristides et al. Aug 1997 A
5657414 Lett et al. Aug 1997 A
5659367 Yuen Aug 1997 A
5661516 Carles Aug 1997 A
5666498 Amro Sep 1997 A
5666645 Thomas et al. Sep 1997 A
5671225 Hooper et al. Sep 1997 A
5684525 Klosterman Nov 1997 A
5689666 Berquist et al. Nov 1997 A
5694163 Harrison Dec 1997 A
5694176 Bruette et al. Dec 1997 A
5694381 Sako Dec 1997 A
5699107 Lawler et al. Dec 1997 A
5699125 Rzeszewski et al. Dec 1997 A
5701383 Russo et al. Dec 1997 A
5710601 Marshall et al. Jan 1998 A
5717452 Janin et al. Feb 1998 A
5724091 Freeman et al. Mar 1998 A
5724203 Kwoh et al. Mar 1998 A
5727060 Young Mar 1998 A
5732216 Logan et al. Mar 1998 A
5734853 Hendricks et al. Mar 1998 A
5737028 Bertram et al. Apr 1998 A
5745710 Clanton, III et al. Apr 1998 A
5751282 Girard et al. May 1998 A
5752159 Faust et al. May 1998 A
5754771 Epperson et al. May 1998 A
5758257 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5760821 Ellis et al. Jun 1998 A
5761607 Gudesen Jun 1998 A
5768528 Stumm Jun 1998 A
5771354 Crawford Jun 1998 A
5778181 Hidary et al. Jul 1998 A
5778182 Cathey et al. Jul 1998 A
5781226 Sheehan Jul 1998 A
5781228 Sposato Jul 1998 A
5781246 Alten et al. Jul 1998 A
5790198 Roop et al. Aug 1998 A
5790202 Kummer et al. Aug 1998 A
5796952 Davis et al. Aug 1998 A
5801747 Bedard Sep 1998 A
5801787 Schein et al. Sep 1998 A
5802284 Karlton et al. Sep 1998 A
5805155 Allibhoy et al. Sep 1998 A
5805763 Lawler et al. Sep 1998 A
5805804 Laursen et al. Sep 1998 A
5808608 Young et al. Sep 1998 A
5808694 Usui et al. Sep 1998 A
5809204 Young et al. Sep 1998 A
5812123 Rowe et al. Sep 1998 A
5812205 Milnes et al. Sep 1998 A
5812937 Takahisa Sep 1998 A
5815662 Ong Sep 1998 A
5818438 Howe et al. Oct 1998 A
5819019 Nelson Oct 1998 A
5819156 Belmont Oct 1998 A
5822123 Davis et al. Oct 1998 A
5828420 Marshall et al. Oct 1998 A
5828945 Klosterman Oct 1998 A
5838314 Neel et al. Nov 1998 A
5841938 Nitta et al. Nov 1998 A
5844620 Coleman et al. Dec 1998 A
5850218 LaJoie et al. Dec 1998 A
5867227 Yamaguchi Feb 1999 A
5903314 Niijima et al. May 1999 A
5909212 Nishina et al. Jun 1999 A
5917481 Rzeszewski et al. Jun 1999 A
5940073 Klosterman et al. Aug 1999 A
5940387 Humpleman Aug 1999 A
5940572 Balaban et al. Aug 1999 A
5945988 Williams et al. Aug 1999 A
5949954 Young et al. Sep 1999 A
5959592 Petruzzelli Sep 1999 A
5963264 Jackson Oct 1999 A
5963645 Kigawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5970486 Yoshida et al. Oct 1999 A
5973683 Cragun et al. Oct 1999 A
5974222 Yuen et al. Oct 1999 A
5977964 Williams et al. Nov 1999 A
5987213 Mankovitz et al. Nov 1999 A
5991799 Yen et al. Nov 1999 A
5995155 Schindler et al. Nov 1999 A
5999688 Iggulden et al. Dec 1999 A
6002394 Schein et al. Dec 1999 A
6005561 Hawkins et al. Dec 1999 A
6005631 Anderson et al. Dec 1999 A
6006257 Slezak Dec 1999 A
6020880 Naimpally Feb 2000 A
6020883 Herz et al. Feb 2000 A
6038367 Abecassis Mar 2000 A
6052145 Macrae et al. Apr 2000 A
6057872 Candelore May 2000 A
6057890 Virden et al. May 2000 A
6058238 Ng May 2000 A
6061097 Satterfield May 2000 A
6091883 Artigalas et al. Jul 2000 A
6091884 Yuen et al. Jul 2000 A
6094680 Hokanson Jul 2000 A
RE36801 Logan et al. Aug 2000 E
6115057 Kwoh et al. Sep 2000 A
6118493 Duhault et al. Sep 2000 A
6122011 Dias et al. Sep 2000 A
6125230 Yaqinuma Sep 2000 A
6125231 Yuen et al. Sep 2000 A
6130726 Darbee et al. Oct 2000 A
6133910 Stinebruner Oct 2000 A
6141488 Knudson et al. Oct 2000 A
6147715 Yuen et al. Nov 2000 A
6157413 Hanafee et al. Dec 2000 A
6163316 Killian Dec 2000 A
6167188 Young et al. Dec 2000 A
6172674 Etherdge Jan 2001 B1
6177931 Alexander et al. Jan 2001 B1
6208335 Gordon et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208799 Marsh et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219839 Sampsell Apr 2001 B1
6233389 Barton et al. May 2001 B1
6239794 Yuen et al. May 2001 B1
6240105 Zetts May 2001 B1
6240241 Yuen May 2001 B1
6256071 Hiroi Jul 2001 B1
6263501 Schein et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275648 Knudson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289346 Milewski et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292624 Saib et al. Sep 2001 B1
6324338 Wood et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326982 Wu et al. Dec 2001 B1
6327418 Barton Dec 2001 B1
6334022 Ohba et al. Dec 2001 B1
6345279 Li et al. Feb 2002 B1
6388714 Schein et al. May 2002 B1
6414725 Clarin et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434614 Blumenau Aug 2002 B1
6441832 Tao et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442332 Knudson et al. Aug 2002 B1
RE37881 Haines Oct 2002 E
6470319 Ryan Oct 2002 B1
6473559 Knudson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6486892 Stern Nov 2002 B1
6487362 Yuen et al. Nov 2002 B1
6498895 Young et al. Dec 2002 B2
6505348 Knowles et al. Jan 2003 B1
6532589 Proehl et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549715 Sasaki Apr 2003 B1
6564005 Berstis May 2003 B1
6564378 Satterfield et al. May 2003 B1
6574716 Dovi Jun 2003 B2
6601237 Ten Kate et al. Jul 2003 B1
6640145 Hoffberg et al. Oct 2003 B2
6670971 Oral Dec 2003 B1
6678737 Bucher Jan 2004 B1
6721954 Nickum Apr 2004 B1
6725253 Okano et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727914 Gutta Apr 2004 B1
6744967 Kaminski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748481 Parry et al. Jun 2004 B1
6756997 Ward, III et al. Jun 2004 B1
6772433 LaJoie et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788882 Geer et al. Sep 2004 B1
6789204 Abdelnur et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792197 Helmstetter Sep 2004 B1
6820278 Ellis Nov 2004 B1
6850693 Young et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853728 Kahn et al. Feb 2005 B1
6857130 Srikantan et al. Feb 2005 B2
6934964 Schaffer et al. Aug 2005 B1
6961511 Ohno et al. Nov 2005 B2
6977897 Nelson et al. Dec 2005 B1
7088910 Potrebic et al. Aug 2006 B2
7089321 Hayashi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7089348 Parry et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096486 Ukai et al. Aug 2006 B1
7116894 Chatterton Oct 2006 B1
7130623 Kirkeby et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139868 Parry et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143170 Swildens et al. Nov 2006 B2
7151886 Young et al. Dec 2006 B2
7165098 Boyer et al. Jan 2007 B1
7185355 Ellis et al. Feb 2007 B1
7187847 Young et al. Mar 2007 B2
7209640 Young et al. Apr 2007 B2
7243364 Dunn et al. Jul 2007 B2
7293276 Phillips et al. Nov 2007 B2
7298960 Taylor et al. Nov 2007 B1
7430753 Gray et al. Sep 2008 B2
7454120 Putterman et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457511 Putterman et al. Nov 2008 B2
7477832 Young et al. Jan 2009 B2
7546363 Harrow et al. Jun 2009 B2
7603022 Putterman et al. Oct 2009 B2
7640564 Green et al. Dec 2009 B2
7650621 Thomas et al. Jan 2010 B2
7739709 Ellis et al. Jun 2010 B2
7779445 Ellis Aug 2010 B2
7840977 Walker et al. Nov 2010 B2
7930431 Kuroiwa et al. Apr 2011 B2
8438601 Putterman et al. May 2013 B2
20010043795 Wood et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020010917 Srikantan et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020016818 Kirani et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020059599 Schein et al. May 2002 A1
20020059621 Thomas et al. May 2002 A1
20020073229 Hayashi Jun 2002 A1
20020090203 Mankovitz Jul 2002 A1
20020152311 Veltman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174430 Ellis et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184451 Dovi Dec 2002 A1
20020191954 Beach et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194585 Connelly Dec 2002 A1
20020194598 Connelly Dec 2002 A1
20020194607 Connelly Dec 2002 A1
20030009766 Marolda Jan 2003 A1
20030020744 Ellis et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030046057 Okunishi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030086023 Chung et al. May 2003 A1
20030110499 Knudson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030118323 Ismail et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149980 Hassell et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030149988 Ellis et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030154486 Dunn et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030154493 Kagle et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030204848 Cheng Oct 2003 A1
20030204856 Buxton Oct 2003 A1
20030210898 Juen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040008971 Young et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040013406 Barton et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040107236 Nakagawa et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128686 Boyer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040163130 Gray et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181814 Ellis et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186901 Guigui Sep 2004 A1
20040215757 Butler Oct 2004 A1
20040218905 Green et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040221019 Swildens Nov 2004 A1
20040221302 Ansari et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040268407 Sparrell et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050002638 Putterman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050002640 Putterman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005300 Putterman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010671 Grannan Jan 2005 A1
20050028208 Ellis et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044567 Young et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050102698 Bumgardner et al. May 2005 A1
20050149964 Thomas et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152669 Kim et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050204388 Knudson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240968 Knudson et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251827 Ellis et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273819 Knudson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283547 Parry et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060018625 Johnson et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060039361 Ohno et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060080415 Tu Apr 2006 A1
20060101417 Hoh May 2006 A1
20060114360 Kortum et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136965 Ellis et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060140584 Ellis et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060179462 Willame et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070058924 Yeh Mar 2007 A1
20070067800 Wachtfogel et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070101377 Six et al. May 2007 A1
20070104456 Craner et al. May 2007 A1
20070157234 Walker Jul 2007 A1
20070157241 Walker Jul 2007 A1
20070157266 Ellis et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070199030 Ellis et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080115169 Ellis et al. May 2008 A1
20080184327 Ellis et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090074380 Boston et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090222875 Cheng et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100074600 Putterman et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100175086 Gaydou et al. Jul 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (158)
Number Date Country
4440419 May 1996 DE
0122626 Oct 1984 EP
0133985 Mar 1985 EP
2262253 Apr 1988 EP
0424469 May 1991 EP
0572090 Dec 1993 EP
0682452 Nov 1995 EP
0753964 Jan 1997 EP
0762756 Mar 1997 EP
0763938 Mar 1997 EP
0836320 Apr 1998 EP
0843468 May 1998 EP
0848554 Jun 1998 EP
0854645 Jul 1998 EP
0874524 Oct 1998 EP
0940983 Sep 1999 EP
0940985 Sep 1999 EP
1280122 Jan 2003 EP
1355496 Oct 2003 EP
1387272 Feb 2004 EP
1473934 Nov 2004 EP
2227622 Aug 1990 GB
2229595 Sep 1990 GB
2346251 Aug 2000 GB
06-111413 Apr 1994 JP
06-303541 Oct 1994 JP
09-289630 Nov 1997 JP
10-042242 Feb 1998 JP
10-112087 Apr 1998 JP
10-164487 Jun 1998 JP
11-088280 Mar 1999 JP
11-136615 May 1999 JP
11-266414 Sep 1999 JP
11-313280 Nov 1999 JP
11-353071 Dec 1999 JP
2000-013708 Jan 2000 JP
2000-138886 May 2000 JP
2000-224533 Aug 2000 JP
2000-235546 Aug 2000 JP
2000-306314 Nov 2000 JP
2001-088372 Apr 2001 JP
2001-165669 Jun 2001 JP
2001-167522 Jun 2001 JP
2001-257950 Sep 2001 JP
2001-346137 Dec 2001 JP
2002-185951 Jun 2002 JP
2003-199004 Jul 2003 JP
2003-304503 Oct 2003 JP
2004-007592 Jan 2004 JP
2004-23326 Jan 2004 JP
2009-515437 Apr 2009 JP
247388 Oct 1994 TW
WO 8804507 Jun 1988 WO
WO 9000847 Jan 1990 WO
WO 9007844 Jul 1990 WO
WO 9100670 Jan 1991 WO
WO 9107050 May 1991 WO
WO 9204801 Mar 1992 WO
WO 9222983 Dec 1992 WO
WO 9304473 Mar 1993 WO
WO 9308542 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9323957 Nov 1993 WO
WO 9413284 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9414284 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9501058 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9504431 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9511567 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9518449 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9531069 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9532584 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9532585 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9532587 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9609721 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9613932 May 1996 WO
WO 9625821 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9626605 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9627982 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9631980 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9633572 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9634491 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9636172 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9637075 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9641418 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9641472 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9641478 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9713368 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9731479 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9732434 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9734413 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9734414 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9740623 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9742763 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9746016 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9746943 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9747124 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9748228 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9748230 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9749237 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9749242 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9801995 Jan 1998 WO
WO 9806219 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9807277 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9810589 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9812872 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9816056 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9817064 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9826584 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9826594 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9826596 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9838831 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9839893 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9843183 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9847279 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9847283 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9847287 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9847289 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9903267 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9912346 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9945700 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9952279 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9957839 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9960790 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9966725 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0004706 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0007368 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0008850 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0008851 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0008852 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0011869 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0016548 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0028739 May 2000 WO
WO 0035193 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0058833 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0058967 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0059214 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0059223 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0062298 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0062299 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0062533 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0067475 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0103088 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0122729 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0146843 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147238 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147249 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147257 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147273 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147279 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0176239 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0176248 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0186511 Nov 2001 WO
WO 02069636 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02078317 Oct 2002 WO
WO 03026187 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03032620 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03047235 Jun 2003 WO
WO 2004059528 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2008042242 Apr 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (34)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 10/613,470, filed Jul. 2, 2003, Putterman, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/613,400, filed Jul. 2, 2003, Putterman, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/613,999, filed Jul. 8, 2003, Yamamoto, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/613,401, filed Jul. 2, 2003, Putterman, et al.
Article: “Automatic Windows 98/ME TCP/IP Addressing without a DHCP Server” Oct. 20, 2000.
“DirecTV Digital Satellite Receiver—Operating Instructions,” Sony Electronics Inc. (2001).
“DirecTV Receiver —Owner's Manual,” DirecTV, Inc. (2002).
“DirecTV Receiver with TiVo Digital Satellite Receiver/Recorder SAT-T60—Installation Guide,” Sony Corporation (2000).
“DirecTV Receiver with TiVo Installation Guide,” Philips (2000).
“DirecTV Receiver with TiVo Viewers Guide” (1999, 2000).
“DishPro Satellite System—Users Guide,” Dish Network, (undated), accessed 2008.
“Fall 2001 TiVo Service Update with Dual Tuner!,” TiVo Inc. (2001).
“PTV Recorder Setup Guide,” Philips (2000).
“RCA Satellite Receiver User's Guide,” Thomson Multimedia Inc. (2001).
“Start Here,” Sony, TiVo and DirecTV, (undated), accessed 2008.
“Universal Plug and Play Device Artchitecture,” Version 1.0 (Jun. 8, 2000).
“VPV—Videotext Programs Videorecorder”, by Bensch, IEEE Jun. 1988, pp. 788-792.
Advanced Analog Systems—Addressable Terminals, General Instrument Corp. of Horsham, Pennsylvania (URL:http//www.gi.com/BUSAREA/ANALOG/TERMINAL/WATCH/watch.html), Printed from the Internet on Mar. 4, 1999.
Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); DVB specification for data broadcasting, European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Draft EN 301 192 V1.2.1 (Jan. 1999).
Electronic Programme Guide (EPG); Protocol for a TV Guide using electronic data transmission, by European Telecommunication Standards Institute, May 1997, Valbonne, France, publication No. ETS 300 707.
Goland et al., Simple Service Discovery Protocol/1.0 Operating Without an Arbiter <draft-cai-ssdp-v1-03.txt>, SSDP Draft Standard. (Oct. 28, 1999) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cai-ssdp-v1-03.
Gong, A Software Architecture for Open Service Gateways, IEEE Internet Computing, Jan.-Feb. 2001 (FROM UV-449).
Hofmann et al., Videotext Programmiert Videorecorder, Rundfunktechnische Mitteilungen, Nov.-Dec. 1982, pp. 254-257 (translation attached).
http://www.iapplianceweb.com/story/OEG20040510N0003BC.htm (May 11, 2004).
Inside I-Guide User's Manual (Aug. 24, 2004).
Jaeger, Set-top Box Software Architecture for Digital Video Broadcast and Interative Services, IEEE 2001 (FROM UV-449).
Rewind, replay and unwind with new high-tech TV devices, LA Times, Magid. This document was printed from the Internet on Jun. 6, 1999 and bears a date of May 19, 1999.
Markoff, 2 Makers Plan Introductions of Digital VCR, The New York Times, Mar. 29, 1999.
Monaco et al., “Remote Device Command Resource Sharing over the Internet: A New Approach Based on a Distributed Layered Architecture,” IEEE Transaction on Computers, vol. 51, No. 7, Jul. 2002, pp. 787-792.
Saito, Takeshi, et al., “Homenetwork Architecture Considering Digital Home Appliance,” Technical Committee meeting of The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE), Japan, Nov. 6, 1997, vol. 97, No. 368, p. 57-64.
TivoToGo™ Transfers (printed Mar. 8, 2006).
User's Guide RCA Color TV with TV Plus + Guide, 1997.
Windows 98 Feature Combines TV, Terminal and the Internet, The New York Times, Aug. 18, 1998.
Wittress et al., Internet Protocol (IP) Set-Top Boxes, Microsoft Windows Embedded IP Set-Top Boxes, Microsoft Corporation, Sep. 2003.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090034935 A1 Feb 2009 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10613400 Jul 2003 US
Child 12252308 US