Patent Grant
8090452
The invention pertains to control systems and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for networking, configuring and operating field devices, controllers, consoles and other control devices.
The terms “control” and “control systems” refer to the control of a device or system by monitoring one or more of its characteristics. This is used to insure that output, processing, quality and/or efficiency remain within desired parameters over the course of time. In many control systems, digital data processing or other automated apparatus monitor a device, process or system and automatically adjust its operational parameters. In other control systems, such apparatus monitor the device, process or system and display alarms or other indicia of its characteristics, leaving responsibility for adjustment to the operator.
Control is used in a number of fields. Process control, for example, is employed in the manufacturing sector for process, repetitive and discrete manufactures, though, it also has wide application in utility and other service industries. Environmental control finds application in residential, commercial, institutional and industrial settings, where temperature and other environmental factors must be properly maintained. Control is also used in articles of manufacture, from toasters to aircraft, to monitor and control device operation.
Modern day control systems typically include a combination of field devices, controllers, workstations and other more powerful digital data processing apparatus, the functions of which may overlap or be combined. Field devices include temperature, flow and other sensors that measure characteristics of the subject device, process or system. They also include valves and other actuators that mechanically, electrically, magnetically, or otherwise effect the desired control.
Controllers generate settings for the control devices based on measurements from sensor type field devices. Controller operation is typically based on a “control algorithm” that maintains a controlled system at a desired level, or drives it to that level, by minimizing differences between the values measured by the sensors and, for example, a setpoint defined by the operator.
Workstations, control stations and the like are typically used to configure and monitor the process as a whole. They are often also used to execute higher-levels of process control, e.g., coordinating groups of controllers and responding to alarm conditions occurring within them.
In a food processing plant, for example, a workstation coordinates controllers that actuate conveyors, valves, and the like, to transport soup stock and other ingredients to a processing vessel. The workstation also configures and monitors the controllers that maintain the contents of that vessel at a simmer or low boil. The latter operate, for example, by comparing measurements of vapor pressure in the processing vessel with a desired setpoint. If the vessel pressure is too low, the control algorithm may call for incrementally opening the heating gas valves, thereby, driving the pressure and boiling activity upwards. As the pressure approaches the desired setpoint, the algorithm requires incrementally leveling the valves to maintain the roil of the boil.
The field devices, controllers, workstations and other components that make up a process control system typically communicate over heterogeneous media. Field devices connect with controllers, for example, over dedicated “fieldbuses” operating under proprietary or industry-specific protocols. Examples of these are FoxCom™, Profibus, ControlNet, ModBus, DeviceNet, among others. The controllers themselves may be connected to one another, as well as to workstations, via backplane or other proprietary high-speed dedicated buses, such as Nodebus™. Communications among workstations and plant or enterprise-level processors may be via Ethernet networks or other Internet Protocol (IP) networks.
Control device manufacturers, individually, and the control industry, as a whole, have pushed for some uniformity among otherwise competing communication standards. The Foundation Fieldbus, for example, is the result of an industry-wide effort to define a uniform protocol for communications among processor-equipped (or “intelligent”) field devices. Efforts such as this have been limited to specific segments of the control hierarchy (e.g., bus communications among field devices) and are typically hampered by technological changes that all to soon render the standards obsolete.
Still less uniform are the command and operation of control devices. Though field devices may function at the direction of controllers and controllers, in turn, at the direction of workstations (or other plant-level processors), proprietary mechanisms within the individual components determine how they perform their respective functions. Even the commands for invoking those functions may be manufacturer- or product-specific. Thus, the commands necessary to drive actuators of one manufacturer will differ from those of another. How the corresponding commands are processed internally within the actuators differ still more (though, hopefully, the results achieved are the same). The specific programming codes used to effect a given control algorithm likewise differs among competing makes, as do those of the higher-level control processors.
Industry efforts toward harmonization of software for command and operation of control devices have focused on editing languages that define process control algorithms. This is distinct from the codes used to effect those algorithms within control devices and, rather, concerns software “tools” available to users to specify the algorithms, e.g., editors including IEC-1131 standard languages such as Field Blocks, Sequential Function Charts (SFC), Ladder Logic and Structured Text.
Less concerted are industry moves to extend monitoring and limited configuration capabilities beyond in-plant consoles, e.g., to remote workstations. An example of this was the abortive Java for Distributed Control (JDC) effort, which proposed enabling in-plant workstations to serve web pages to remote Java bytecode-enabled client computers. The latter used the to web pages to monitor and set control parameters which the workstations, in turn, incorporated into their own control schemes.
An academic system along these same lines was suggested by the Mercury Project of the University of Southern California, proposing the use of a web browser to enable remote users to control a robotic arm via a server that controlled the arm. A related company-specific effort included that announced by Tribe Computer Works that allegedly enabled users to manage routers and remote access servers over IP networks using web browser software. See, “Tribe Defines Net Management Role For Web Browser Software,” Network World, May 22, 1995, at p. 14.
Thus sets the stage for the present invention, an object of which is to provide improved methods and apparatus for networking, configuring and operating field devices, controllers, consoles and other control devices. A related object is to provide such methods and apparatus for process control.
Further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as reduce the confusion, complexity and costs attendant to prior art control systems.
Related objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as can be implemented with commercial off the shelf hardware and software.
Still further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as achieve confusion-, complexity- and cost-reduction without hampering manufacturer creativity and without removing incentives to development of product differentiators.
The foregoing are among the objects attained by invention which provides, in one aspect, an improved field device for a process or other control system. The field device includes a virtual machine environment for executing Java byte code (or other such intermediate code) that, for example, configures the device to execute a control algorithm.
By way of non-limiting example, the field device can be an “intelligent” transmitter or actuator that includes a low power processor, along with a random access memory, a read-only memory, FlashRAM, and a sensor interface. The processor can execute a real-time operating system, as well as a Java virtual machine (JVM). Java byte code executes in the JVM to configure the field device to perform typical process control functions, e.g., for proportional integral derivative (PID) control and signal conditioning.
Further aspects of the invention provide a field device, such as a low-power intelligent actuator, that incorporates an embedded web server. This can be used to configure, monitor and/or maintain the device itself (as well as other elements of the control system) via a browser attached directly to the device or coupled to it over the network. To this end, the field device can incorporate a configuration editor, e.g., operating on a processor within the field device, that an end-user executes via the browser and web server.
Such a configuration editor can, in related aspects of the invention, be enabled or disabled depending on the environment in which it is used and more specifically, for example, the type of network in which it is incorporated. Thus, for example, the editor can be disabled when the field device is incorporated in a process control network that includes, e.g., an applications development environment suitable for configuration of the field device. Conversely, it can be enabled when the field device is incorporated in a network that lacks such a capability.
Still further aspects of the invention provide a field device as described above that includes an interface to an IP network, through which the device communicates with other elements of the control system. The IP network can be, for example, an Ethernet network. Moreover, it can be “powered,” carrying electrical power as well as packets, datagrams, and other control or data signals. The field device, in related aspects of the invention, draws operational power, e.g., for its processor and other components, from such a network.
Yet further aspects of the invention provide a field device as described above that obtains configuration information and/or its network address from such an IP network upon start-up. To this end, on power-up or coupling to the network, the field device can supply an identifier (e.g., attained from a letterbug, assigned by a hub, or otherwise) to a DHCP or other server on the network. Once provided with an IP address, the field device can formally enter into the control network, e.g., by posting its characteristics to a network bulletin board, e.g., using a network enabler such as a Jini and/or JavaSpace server, or the like. Other network devices monitoring or notified via such a bulletin board can send configuration information to the field device or otherwise.
Still further aspects of the invention provide control devices, such as servers, control stations, operator consoles, personal computers, handheld computers, and the like, having attributes as described above. Such control devices can have other attributes, according to further aspects of the invention. Thus, by way of non-limiting example, they can provide web servers that collect process data from one or more control devices, generate source for operator displays, provide access to the control system, and host an applications development environment.
Still other aspects of the invention provide process, environmental, industrial and other control systems that comprise field and control devices as described above that are coupled via an IP network and, particularly, for example, by a powered IP network.
Additional aspects of the invention are directed to DHCP servers and network enablers (optionally, including web servers) for use in control systems as described above. Related aspects provide such servers and enablers as are embodied in solid state technologies, e.g., with no moving parts.
These and other aspects of the invention are evident in the attached drawings, and in the description and claims that follow.
A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which:
The networked control devices include actuators, such as the valves depicted as controlling inlets and outlets 24-28 and 34. A further actuator is shown controlling paddle 30. These and other actuators utilized by the control system are constructed and operated in the conventional manner, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. The actuators operate under control of respective field device controllers, labeled CTL, that are also constructed and operated in the conventional manner to provide initialization, signal conditioning and communications functions.
Rather than using separate controllers CTL, the actuators can be of the intelligent variety and can include integral microprocessors or other digital data processing apparatus for control, initialization, signal conditioning, communications and other control-related functions. For sake of convenience, the label CTL is used regardless of whether the control-related functionality is integral to the actuators (e.g., as in the case of intelligent actuators) or otherwise.
Illustrated sensor 29 monitors a temperature, level or other characteristic of fluid in chamber 22. The sensor 29, as well as other sensing apparatus utilized by the system, are constructed and operated in the conventional manner known in the art, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. They can be coupled to the control network via a transmitter or other interface device INT that, too, is constructed and operated in the conventional manner, as modified by the teachings hereof. The interface devices facilitate initialization, signal conditioning and communications between the sensors and the control system. As above, one or more sensors can be of the intelligent variety, incorporating integral microprocessors or other digital data processing capabilities for initialization, signal conditioning, communications and other control-related functions. Here, too, the label INT is used in reference to the control-related functionality, regardless of whether embodied in an intelligent transmitter or otherwise.
The networked control devices include one or more controllers 36 that monitor and control respective aspects of the hypothetical mixing process in the conventional manner, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. The controllers can comprise mainframe computers, workstations, personal computers, special-purpose hardware or other digital data processing apparatus capable of performing conventional monitoring and control functions. Preferred controllers are constructed and operated in the manner of the CP control processors commercially available from the assignee hereof, as modified in accord with the teachings herein.
The control system 10 includes a variety of devices that serve as user interfaces and that provide configuration and/or control functions, all in the conventional manner as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. Illustrated for these purposes are workstation 40, laptop computer 42 and handheld computer 44. These devices can provide configuration and control functions directly, as in the case of workstation 40, or in cooperation with server devices, e.g., as in the case of handheld computer 44 and server 46. Apparatus 40-44 can couple with the control network directly, e.g., via bus or network connection, or indirectly, e.g., via satellite, wireless connection or modem connection.
The control devices 36-46, CTL and INT, collectively, referred to as “native” devices, are coupled for communications via a medium that permits at least selected ones of the devices to communicate with one another. To this end, in the illustrated embodiment those devices are coupled via one or more networks 48 that are, preferably, IP-based such as, by way non-limiting example, Ethernets. The network(s) can include, as indicated by the multiple segments shown in the drawing, multiple segments such as various wide and local area networks. They may also include high and/or low bandwidth components, such as phone lines, and low and/or high latency components, such as geosynchronous satellites networks.
Native enterprise server 52 (corresponding, by way of non-limiting example, to server 46) comprises a mainframe computer or engineering workstation that executes enterprise-level applications such as, by non-limiting example, those for financial, asset planning and procurement, distribution and/or human resources. In addition, it supports web serving, as well as optional object, relational and other database management systems. Server 52 executes Windows NT, Solaris or another conventional commercial or proprietary operating system. It is also equipped with a Java Virtual Machine (JVM), e.g., capable of executing Java virtual machine instructions (bytecodes), of performing remote method invocation (RMI), and of supporting Jini networking. The enterprise server 12 can be coupled to further networks, e.g., to the Internet, as shown, in any manner known in the art.
Native thin client 54 (corresponding, for example, to handheld computer 44) provides similar functionality as server 52, though its actual processing activity is limited to user input and output. Application processing, such as financial, asset planning and procurement, distribution and/or human resources, are performed on behalf of client 54 by a server, such as server 52. The operating system and JVM functions may be embedded in the conventional manner of a thin client. The thin client 54 is coupled to the enterprise server 52 over a business information network 66 (corresponding, for example, to network 48), typically, an Ethernet or other IP network, configured in a LAN, WAN or the like.
Native plant server 56 (corresponding, by way of non-limiting example to workstation 40) comprises a plant control console or engineering workstation modified in accord with the teachings hereof, executing plant-level control applications including system, process, engineering, plant information, configuration, lab quality, maintenance, resource and documentation applications of the type known in the art. Like enterprise server 52, plant server 56 can execute Windows NT, Solaris or other conventional operating systems. It is also preferably equipped to execute a Java Virtual Machine as described above. Plant server 56 is coupled to the enterprise server 52 and thin client 54 over the business information network 66.
Native thin client 58 provides similar functionality as server 56 though, again, relies on that (or another) server to perform most processing activity. As above, the operating system and JVM functions may be embedded in the conventional manner of a thin client. The thin client 58 is coupled to the plant server 56 over a control network 68 (corresponding, for example, to network 48), e.g., an Ethernet.
Native controller 60 (corresponding, for example, to controller 36) executes control algorithms to control associated non-native field devices 64, e.g., via any variety of commercial and/or proprietary field bus 70 hardware and protocols. Where processing resources are limited, the controller 60 utilizes a embedded operating system that supports web serving and the JVM. The controller 60 is coupled to the plant sever 66 and to the thin client 58 via control network 68.
Native field device 62 is a sensor, actuator or other field device. The illustrated device is of the intelligent variety, including processor (not shown) and operating system. It can be of the type commercially available in the marketplace, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. The illustrated device supports web serving and JVM, as described above. The device 62 provides information collection and control functions, as illustrated.
Referring to
In addition to web technologies, the illustrated control system 10 uses an object location service, a commercial messaging service, and standard networking equipment, such as hubs, routers, network interface cards, where applicable. It also relies on common standards, where applicable, such as 802.3, Internet RFCs, the IEEE 1451 sensor standards. The system 10 supports a heterogeneous computing environment and utilizes industry standards (e.g., Microsoft standards) to provide communications between the native control components to the business and desktop environments.
1 Device Hardware
1.1 Platform-Defining Control Devices
In the illustrated embodiment, native control devices such as controllers 36, 60, workstation 40, servers 46, 52, 56 providing a platform for the control system typically include a central processing unit (CPU), memory (RAM), network support hardware, access to permanent storage, an operating system, and a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) including the TCP/IP suite. In addition, the devices include web server software, e.g., software of the type that serves graphical “web” pages in response to requests by other devices. Configurator software can be provided, as well, permitting each device to configure the control system or selected portions of it. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that not all of these components need be included in all native control devices, e.g., some commercially available JVMs can serve as an OS themselves.
Process control object (PCO) software provided on the platform-defining control devices comprise a collection of data and methods implemented in Java and executed on the native control devices' JVMs to perform typical process control functions, by way of non-limiting example, signal conditioning and PID control. Likewise, station management object (SMO) software on the devices comprise data and methods that allow the device to report its health, performance, and other status information in a uniform manner. The SMO software can implement SNMP or the equivalent Java functionality.
Software is also provided on the platform-defining controls devices for messaging services for data transfer and alarm/event notification, as well as software comprising system management pages. Each control device may include additional software, of course, depending on its functionality.
1.2 Field Devices
Native intelligent field devices typically include a low power CPU, e.g., a NetARM or Java Chip; a real-time OS like VxWorks, QNX, PSOS; RAM; FlashRAM to serve as permanent storage; ROM/EEPROM to serve as the home for the OS and other permanent software; an Ethernet interface; power from the Ethernet interface (in the event a powered Ethernet network or hub is used) or otherwise; a sensor interface, e.g., IEEE 1451.1 and 1451.2; JVM; a web server, and a device specific configurator servlet. A field device so constructed can be configured and monitored via a lightweight web browser, e.g., handheld computer 44, coupled to the device over the network 48.
The field devices can include serial interfaces to allow the attachment of these devices to HART, FoxComm, Profibus and other networks operating under a protocol different from that of network 48. Combined with appropriate software, these devices provide the user with a single transmitter suitable for use on any field network.
One configuration of a native intelligent field device including the elements described above these elements is shown in
1.2.1 Stoic Sensors
The control system 10 can include one or more stoic sensors, not illustrated, that constitute minimal sensing elements. Typically, these are simply silicon chips that are packaged to allow them to sense the process environment and that have only enough electronics to relay measurements to a pair of wires that carry the raw signal to another device for processing. Some stoic sensors generate a signal without external power; others require some excitation. In a preferred embodiment, native devices 36-46, CTL and INT according to the invention support the attachment of many stoic sensors.
1.2.2 I/O
1.2.2.1 Overview
Some I/O devices, e.g., thermocouples, RTDs and analog transmitters, may not use a transmitter compatible with the network 48 but, rather, send raw sensor output to a multiplexor for processing. To accommodate these devices, the system 10 includes two types of intelligent I/O cards: network I/O cards supporting IP and an API, and native I/O cards that support the protocol of network 48 (i.e., the “native” protocol) directly.
Network I/O cards are coupled directly to network 48. Native control devices are IP enabled and support the proprietary API of the cards, thereby, permitting reading and writing of their I/O registers. The cards' respective APIs support retrieval of data in several formats (raw counts, linearized counts, engineering units, etc.), as well as the assignment of simple configuration information to those registers, if the device supports such functions. To this end, the native devices utilize I/O classes that corresponding to the native I/O protocols. Redundant I/O devices can be physically interfaced transparently through a single I/O card or through multiple independent network I/O cards. Logically, PCOs support at least the use of multiple independent cards. Alternative I/O features may be used in addition. Native I/O cards are substantially similar to native-enabled transmitters, except for packaging and scale. These I/O cards may be considered as small multi-loop controllers or multiplexors.
1.2.2.2 Foreign Device Integration
Networked I/O cards are utilized with devices that cannot otherwise directly interface with the network 48. The cards, in this case, provide an interface that permits at least reading and writing of relevant device values, which can be stored internally to the card and accessed via its API. Foreign devices that are control systems in its own right typically maintain objects or other data structures representing process values and associated data. A preferred interface to these “devices” are through objects that wrap the foreign function blocks with the services expected of native devices, e.g., detail displays and configurators, which are accessed in exactly the same manner as native ones of those same services. For example, a name service is be able to locate foreign blocks and the native API of system 10 permits querying those blocks for values.
1.3 Native Controllers
In a preferred embodiment, all native devices may be used as controllers, though, dedicated I/O-less native controllers, such as controllers 36 and 60, are typically required for unit-wide operations. Thus, for example, control can also be provided by personal computers, workstations and servers of the type shown as elements 40, 42, 46, in
1.4 Native Compliant Workstations
Native workstations, e.g., such as element 40, can be constitute web browser-enabled devices that communicate with web servers, such as element 46, that actually collect the process data from other native devices. In addition, the workstations can consist of a flat panel display, OS and web browser in ROM (or on a memory card), web page (process graphic) database/cache, connections for optional annunciator keyboards, option for wireless Ethernet, and, optional, battery operation. Data supporting the operator interface comes from native devices directly.
1.5 Native Web Server
If a generic web browser-enabled device is the operator's console, a native web server, such as servers 46, 52, 56 sources the operator displays. This can be implemented with redundancy using technologies NT's clustering capabilities, or the like. Additionally, a native web server provides access to a illustrated control system 10 to users not physically attached to the illustrated control system 10, e.g., as illustrated with respect to elements 44 and 46 of
1.6 Native Enablers
1.6.1 The illustrated control system 10 includes native enablers 49, such as Jini and JavaSpaces devices and Solid-State DHCP servers. These enablers, which are optionally redundant, are preferably fully solid state with persistent memories. They do not use batteries for their persistent memory, though they may well plug into a wall outlet for power in non-industrial environments. The Jini and JavaSpaces serve as community “bulletin boards.” These are used to notify system monitors that native devices have been added to or removed from the system. The system monitors respond to such notices by triggering appropriate actions.
The illustrated control system 10 assumes that each native device is able to acquire an IP address when it comes on-line. To minimize configuration, a DHCP server, illustrated for example by element 49, is required to furnish these addresses. To ensure maximum availability of this critical server, it is preferably a solid-state device and, optionally, includes a redundant partner DHCP Server. A particular native DHCP server provides addresses for a portion of the network 48. It obtains its configuration by notifying the system 10 that it has come on line.
Those skilled in the art will, of course, appreciate that IP addresses can be selected by mechanisms other than DHCP servers.
1.6.2 Native Internetwork Server
An internetwork server 47 is used to link separate control systems networks 48. It provides a platform for inter-network communications, controlled access to data, name conflict resolution, and other services need to efficiently, securely, and transparently accomplish the connection of one or more illustrated control systems to another.
2 SubSystems
2.1 Software Downloads
The illustrated system permits the electronic downloading of software and/or licenses for execution on the native devices. This includes native software objects, updates and/or licenses for same. To ensure proper operation of the process facility even in the event of insufficient licenses, downloaded software registers with the system monitor and declares whether or not it is licensed. In the case of insufficient licensing, the system monitor's notifies the customer appropriately.
In instances where appropriate native software modules and authorizations are in place, the system 10 can access a download site, e.g., an Internet e-commerce site, and determines if updates are available. If so, it notifies the user and invites him/her to request downloading of the upgrade. Such an e-commerce or other web site can also provide configuration tools that allow the user to design, implement, and test a new PCO block. This allows the user to access complex and/or rapidly improving software tools without having to maintain them locally. For this purpose, the use is charged, e.g., a modest access fee.
2.2 Security
The system 10 includes a native security system to control access to managed objects based on the type of access, e.g., (i) extra-network, i.e., users who are accessing the illustrated control system 10 from a non-native station; (ii) inter-network, i.e., users who are operating from a native workstation on a different physical native network; and (iii) intra-network, i.e., users who are operating from a native workstation within the particular native network.
Secured extra-system access is provided through a native secure web server, e.g., server 46, that permits dial-up, network, and other remote access and that supplies and defines the permitted extra-network access, including the API available to applications hosted outside the network or on the server. See, for example, elements 44 and 46 of
Inter-system access is provided by a gateway device, such as server 47, that permits the secure transfer of data. This device negotiates secure access, deals with name conflicts between systems, and provides support for various physical media A pair of such devices are provided to account for situations where the source is local to the sink. In a preferred system, the server 47 or other gateway encrypts the data so that others cannot read it. Likewise, it authenticates message sources to verify that they are coming from a matching device. A preferred gateway minimizes the number of packet transfers so as to minimize delays over slow or high latency links.
Secured intra-system access is controlled based on the user and the workstation, leveraging the Java security model and other security models to the extent possible. The native security system authenticates users, e.g., regardless of whether they are attempting access from operator's console or via an application program.
The native security system manages access to objects, including PCO attributes (i.e., variables and/or parameters of PCOs), system monitors, and native messages. It allows applications to add objects to the list of managed objects. Read and write access is preferably controlled separately, i.e., as if a single PCO attribute was two separate objects.
The security model is based on a lock and key approach. Each PCO attribute, for example, is assigned to one of a large number of locks. The user is given different keys for read and write access to object attributes. This key may be modified according to the type of native workstation used for access. The key is passed to the object attribute when the object attribute is accessed. If the access is a connection, it need be passed only once. The object attribute compares the key to its lock and allow or deny access as appropriate.
A software tool is supplied with the applications development environment (ADE) or configurator that allows identification of users; access points allowed by the user; object attribute groups accessible to the user; and access type (read or write) to the object types. The object attribute groups define collections of object attributes via similar security access guidelines, e.g., alarm limits might be in one group and tuning parameters might be in another. The security model is embedded in the APIs providing access to the secured objects. This assures that that access is granted only after the native security system has performed the necessary verifications.
2.3 Maintenance and Support
The illustrated control system 10 supports the on-line upgrade of all application software from remote and local workstations. Application software, for purposes of this discussion, includes the system monitor, PCOs, and other Java-based code. Native diagnostic and maintenance tools work over user-supplied or other IP-based networks, providing that they allow services such as the world wide web to operate over them to external sites. For networks that do not permit this, the illustrated control system 10 provides modules that support direct connections to a native support center via dialup analog phone lines, and dialup high speed lines, e.g., ISDN and ADSL. Native maintenance, including software updates, operate over these connections; hence, it is not necessary for a person to be physically present to update system or application software.
The illustrated control system IO includes diagnostics to track problems from the hardware upwards. Maintenance staff can run in parallel diagnostic versions of the software. Such software running in open loop or switched into operation as necessary is believed particularly advantageous for support purposes.
2.4 Configuration
An application development environment (ADE) coordinates configuration in the illustrated control system 10, e.g., except for devices (such as certain transmitters and positioners) where use of an ADE is not advantageous and for which internal configuration is preferred. Characteristics of the ADE are its use in configuring/building control applications including control schemes, displays, historians, etc.; support of multiple simultaneous users; support of remote, concurrent development; support of change tracking and change management including task based activity traces, summary reports, change annotation, approval cycles, and user identification; a human interface component that runs in any web browser coupled to the system; a server component that runs on any user-supplied system; permanent storage comprising a commercial database for which a JDBC implementation is available; allowing the definition of configuration object templates; allowing the instantiation of configuration object templates into configuration objects; allowing the user to add and remove editors for configuration object components in real-time; limiting the user's access to configuration capabilities in the various pieces of equipment; and supporting application distribution along with verification of download permissions.
With respect to the support of multiple simultaneous users, system editors provide object-based “check-out” and “check-in.” No other user is allowed to edit a checked-out object or any of the objects that it contains. As an alternative, editors support the concept of task-based configuration activities and the related “check-out” and “check-in” facilities required to make it work. When an object is checked out, it is assigned to a task. Objects are not checked back in, tasks are. A build manager has the responsibility of integrating the tasks.
The native ADE delivers lower engineering and maintenance costs through the unification of application development, preservation of application expertise, reduction of application development effort, and the deployment of developed applications. Is it based on industry standards (e.g., IEC 1131 and IEC 1499) to preserve the user's investment in training and applications. It also produces appropriately formatted Java class for execution in native devices. Since the native ADE produces output that can be read and loaded into a JVM and since the native control devices include JVM, one control configurator can configure all native devices.
In a preferred embodiment, the ADE imports configurations from legacy systems; supports the use of third-party control algorithms; and supports both bulk building of control configurations and on-line changes with validation.
Configuration is not limited to implementation on a web browser, though this can be advantageous since it allows configuration from many types of device without installation of special software, i.e., it provides a thin-client configuration mechanism. For device configuration, there are two cases: a device used in illustrated control system 10 and a device used outside illustrated control system 10. For devices used outside illustrated control system 10, the configurator is placed in the device so that it can be configured even without the native ADE. This on-board configurator allows the device to be configured for use with Profibus, Foundation Fieldbus, on 4-20 ma wires, and other industry-standard or proprietary networks. For devices used in the native environment, (i) a copy of the configurator is available from a native web server for off-line configuration and download, and (ii) the on-board configurator is disabled to prevent changes in the configuration except through the ADE.
2.5 Human Interface
The illustrated system's primary human interface (HI) device is a web browser. The current range of devices executing these spans cellular phones to mainframe computers. The native HI is multilingual, i.e., it supports the presentation of information in a default language and one or more secondary languages simultaneously. All standard native applications support text substitution based on the currently selected language. Error messages are likewise in the currently selected language.
2.6 Process Control
Process Control is implemented using process control objects (PCOs) running in an execution environment consisting of a JVM and any associated applications required to load and execute the specified control strategies. Control strategies are specified in terms of PCO composites. PCOs are Java classes designed to be modular and easily upgraded even during operation. The native PCO configurator, from a high level view, creates instances of these classes, connects them as necessary, and installs them in particular devices.
Process control objects consist of two user-available types: blocks and composites. PCO blocks are, from the user's point of view, similar to conventional function blocks. Likewise, composites are similar to conventional collections of function blocks. Distinguishing external features of PCOs include the fact that changes involve the addition/deletion of PCOs and cause new versions to be loaded into the targeted native device. The new version runs in parallel with the old version until the engineer decides that it is operating properly and “swaps” the control from old to new.
Composite PCOs may span stations transparently. PCOs are bound to stations very late in the configuration process and may be migrated from one station to another at any time. Further, PCOs from different sources may operate in the same device if the configurator supports the use of multiple PCO libraries.
A native PCO configurator supports multiple libraries of PCOs from multiple vendors; permits the creation of composite PCOs from other PCOs; permits the use of composite PCOs as templates, with a composite PCO definition specifying which fields is altered in a template; permits the assignment of PCOs to physical devices; provides IEC 1131/1499 influenced view of the configuration process, i.e., support for Logic Diagrams, Structured Text, Sequential Function Charts, Function Blocks, and PCOs, while producing Java byte code as its output.
The creation of composites includes the raising of internal (deeply buried) names to the top level of the composite PCO. For example, a cascaded Temperature/Flow loop might have the temperature and flow measurements referenced as TC_CASCADE:PRIMARYFLOW and TC_CASCADE:SECONDARYFLOW or as the longer fully qualified name. The configurator works both off-line in a bulk creation mode and on-line in an individual correction mode.
2.7 Communications: Object Location, Message Transfer, and Data Transfer
The concepts of object location and data/message transfer are closely bound. A process control system imposes significant quality of service requirements on any services used to locate objects of interest and to acquire values from or make changes to those objects. The illustrated system includes an object location and data transfer service that provides a communication model definition, security, object location services, network types requiring support, quality of service, APIs (Java and non-Java), maintenance and upgrade strategy, and interoperability with existing control systems. In addition, the communications system addresses the particular needs of process data transfer.
2.8 Critical Applications
2.8.1 Time Synchronization
The illustrated control system 10 supports time synchronization to the millisecond in each station on the network 46. Where equipment configuration renders this impossible, time synchronization to 50 ms is provided.
2.8.2 Alarm and Message Management
The illustrated control system 10 provides a facility that centralizes viewing, recording, organizing, and categorizing the messages generated by the system monitor, the operator action journals, the PCOs, and other systems that record textual information. This application is the basis for alarm management strategies including inferential alarming and alarm prediction. However, the message management facility is not in and of itself an alarm historian. Rather, it relies on a native historian to provide the long-term storage of this information.
2.8.3 Historian
The native historian provides the fundamental data collection, reduction, and archival services. The data collected includes process values and messages from various applications within the illustrated control system 10. In addition, it provides historical data in support of several other common applications—typically known as plant information management system (PIMS) programs and trend window support. The historian is capable of exporting its data to user-selected databases.
2.8.4 Plant Information Management System
These applications include a simple and easy to report writing facility, a calculation facility that can use historical and real-time data to compute new values, and a desktop visualization system that uses the historians data instead of real-time data. The desktop visualization system uses the native graphics capabilities to connect the graphics to the historian and to allow the operator to “move” the entire graphic backwards and forwards through the historical data. The values calculated by the calculation facility are stored in PCOs that represent the data and generate appropriate alarms. The report writing facility supports shift reports with calendar adjustments as a simple to use feature. In addition, it facilitates the definition of ad-hoc reports using a page layout metaphor.
3 Interoperablity
Interoperability of the illustrated control system 10 with legacy process control systems can be facilitated by adding a networked I/O module to the I/O chain of existing I/O cards, adding a native device integrator to talk to other networks of devices, or utilizing a native API for Microsoft- and Solaris-based applications.
4 Operating the Control System
4.1 System Startup and Management
4.1.1 Device Identification
Each native device is assigned a name that is used to identify the device and obtain any configuration information that it needs. Embodiments of the invention use alternate approaches to identifying a device, including using a hub that is configured by the user to assign a name to each of its ports, e.g., using letterbug or software configuration; installing a letterbug, e.g., on the workshop bench, which tells the device its name; using a PC or handheld computer, e.g., on the workshop bench, to give the device its name; or using soft letterbugs.
4.1.2 Address Acquisition
After a native device has its name, it acquires its IP address from its environment. The illustrated embodiment uses DHCP for this purpose. Preferably, the DHCP server is a native device, such as enabler 49, though other DHCP servers can be used, as well.
4.1.3 Registration of the Device
Once the device knows its address, it registers its characteristics on a native bulletin board, which can be colocated with the DHCP server, e.g., in an enabler 49. Typically, many software services in the system 10 register with the bulletin board for notification of additions of native devices. Upon registration of a device, these services are notified and enter into relationships, if any, with the new device. A typical situation would involve notifying a system monitor process that a native device is active. That process then updates its web page with information about this device. In a preferred embodiment that utilizes a hierarchical network, each bulletin board is covers a given “territory” or region of the network.
4.1.4 Configuration Acquisition
If a device is unconfigured, it marks the “Configured” attribute on its bulletin board entry as “False”. Any system monitor receiving device notifications to this effect generates an alert. Once a device has its name, it is able to communicate with any networked supply of non-volatile storage. This is particularly useful in the case of devices with limited in device non-volatile storage, whom a system configuration utility notifies of the location of configuration information. Devices that can retain all of their configuration information can start up using that configuration. Actions taken during start-up, e.g., taking PID algorithms out of hold, are configurable.
4.1.5 System Monitors
A system monitor monitors the health of system components (hardware and software), monitors the health and operation of user applications, provides configuration information to devices that request it, and monitors the licensing of software and upgrades for purposes of alerting the appropriate groups. The system monitor supports standard SNMP agents and any native specific system management protocols.
The predominant source of information used by the system monitors are the bulletin boards which, as noted above, are used by the native devices to record their current state of operation. As devices are added and removed from the bulletin boards, the system monitor displays that information. The information posted on the bulletin boards includes diagnostic information. A system monitor not only displays this information but also allows the user to access and operate any embedded diagnostic displays and operations.
4.2 Device Configuration and Management
4.2.1 Device Startup
Restart of a native device is effected by the steps of
The steps involved in on-line native device configuration are:
If the device is on a native network 48, the native configurator (ADE) is used to make the changes. In this case, the web browser is pointed at the web server that hosts the ADE. This approach eliminates conflicts between field change and database changes. The configuration of non-native devices is provided by a service that encapsulates the native commands and passes them through a native device to the actual foreign device.
The steps in PCO configuration are
As noted above, the proposed security mechanism is a lock and key. In this model, the attributes of an object that are available to be manipulated are assigned a lock number. An application registers with the security system at start-up to obtain a key. The value of the key depends on the effective user id (name) and the station on which the application is running. The key is never visible to the user, so he/she cannot alter it. This key is available to any library that uses the security system to ensure proper access.
5.1.1.2 Security Database
A security database contains a list of users. For each user it allows the specification of a master key, i.e., a bit array with a bit set for each lock the user is allowed to unlock. There is one master key for each object type supported by the security system. By default, the security system supports the creation of master keys for the system monitor, process data (PCO attributes), and native messages (events). The database also allows modifications to the master key for a user based on the station used to perform an operation. These exceptions can be expressed as IP addresses, station names, or by the type of access being used (e.g., extra-system, inter-system, or intra-system).
5.1.1.3 Operation
The security system supports caching the security system database on specific servers to improve redundant operation and to speed key queries. This is generally not a significant issue since the query is done once per application. Each time an operation is attempted or, in some circumstances, once per connection, the key is passed to the target object along with any other information required by the object to achieve the user's request. It is the responsibility of the object to match a bit in the key with the lock on the attribute or method being altered. If there is a match, the operation proceeds. If the match fails, the operation is aborted and the calling application is notified of the failure. If the lock is zero, the operation is allowed to continue.
5.1.1.4 Use
According to a preferred practice, the illustrated control system 10 supports at least 256 individual locks. This allows the application engineer to define 255 groups of objects for each type of object being accessed.
5.1.1.5 Impact on PCOs and Other System Components
The value record of a PCO attribute includes two keys: one for read access and one for write access. A default value for the key can be inherited according to rules concerning the use of the attribute, e.g., all alarm attributes have an assigned group by default. A system monitor interface implements the same mechanism.
5.2 Maintenance and Support
5.3 Configuration
A configuration object (CO) is a collection of objects plus the editor used to manipulate them. A Configuration Object Template (COT) is a CO that has not been instantiated. The application development environment (ADE) is the environment for configuration object editors. It shows the user the existing COs in the CO being edited and a list of available templates. It provides the mechanism for adding objects to a CO by instantiating a COT and for removing COs. A Configuration Object Component (COC) is any of the objects found in a Configuration Object. Typical components are: PCOs, Process Graphics, Reports, Historian Configuration Objects, etc. The ADE has two components: the human interface and the server. Several human interfaces can access the same server at any time.
When a Native device is placed on-line, its internal configuration services are disabled. All configuration instructions come from the application development environment. Where on-line configuration is permitted, the system monitor or other system component flags any configuration mismatches.
Invoking the ADE is tantamount to starting the editor of a particular top-level CO. The ADE presents all of the available COs within the selected CO and all of the available COTs. The ADE provides a mechanism for manipulating those objects and for adding new objects by instantiating COTs. Since the objects within the ADE are also Configuration Objects, i.e., they are themselves collections of objects with associated editors, configuration involves selecting an object, invoking its editor, and making changes. Each editor knows how to store its object's data in the persistent storage.
The ADE preferably includes a system editor, a control editor, a graphic editor, a message manager editor, a historian editor. All editors support the use and creation of templates by the user. The also support the assignment of their objects to particular stations in the native network. Not all objects require assignment, but the editors are responsible for it.
5.3.1 System Editor
The system editor allows the user to configure a logical arrangement of native device objects. The only devices it configures are those that are native-enabled. If a device, such as Networked I/O, does not support Native, this editor is not interested in it. The following table lists those devices, what they do, and what needs to be configured.
As with the other editors, the system editor is object oriented and template driven. The user is allowed to select an object type from a palette and attach it to the appropriate stations. Individual Device Editors are provided for each of the device types.
5.3.1.1 DHCP/Bulletin Board Editor
If the device is assigned to another DHCP/bulletin board device or a web server, the editor allows the user to specify the number of IP addresses that this device needs to be able to supply below it. In this case, when the device starts up, it gets its own IP address and IP address range from the Web Server or DHCP/bulletin board device to which it is assigned. If it is not assigned to such a device, the editor allows a range of IP addresses to be assigned to it. It is assumed that the device gets its own IP address from another, non-Native DHCP Server.
5.3.1.2 Native PCO Platforms
Each device type on the network is provided a specific editor to control its specific configuration. Typical devices are: transmitters, actuators, controllers, etc. These editors are available for off-line configuration. In this case, the system monitor downloads any approved configurations at the next start-up. The editors may also be available on-board the device (e.g., for fixed function devices such as single station controllers), which allows direct configuration through a web browser. The on-board facility is automatically disabled once the device is placed on a native network. This ensures database consistency while allowing the use of the device on non-native networks. In the illustrated embodiment, device specific configurators are provide in ADE add-in and on-board, preferably, with the same code would be available and used for both.
5.3.1.3 Native Workstations
The configuration of this device includes user name(s) allowed; read only operation; full fledged operator; and so forth.
5.3.1.4 Native Server
The configuration of this station is a range of addresses if it is acting as a DHCP server.
5.3.2 The Control Editor
The Control Editor implements PCOs plus four of the IEC 1131-3 languages (LD, ST, SFC, and FB). Any control schemes built in those languages are translated into a Java file, compiled, and downloaded. The IEC 1131-3 concept of configurations, resources, programs, and tasks are translated into the native environment that consists of set of native platforms. In addition, the Control Editor supports defining of control schemes using PCOs in the same manner that it supports the use of IEC Function Blocks; supports the assignment of control entities to specific PCO platforms; the importation of instruments lists to generate, and PCOs.
5.3.3 The Graphic Editor
The Graphic Editor support all of the human interface (HI) functionality and graphics typical of this type of editor.
5.3.4 Application Configuration
Applications can only be assigned to native web servers.
5.3.4.1 Historian Object Editor
A historian object when found in a CO is a representation of a portion of the full historian configuration, e.g., a slice of the historian. The historian object consists of the name of the historian to receive the data and a list of PCO attributes. Each attribute is associated with certain critical information related to the historian, e.g., change deltas, sample rates, reduction operations, archive characteristics, etc. Starting the historian editor resulting in showing the full configuration of the historian(s) to which this object is assigned.
5.3.4.1.1 Historian Data Definition Object Editor
One historian object exists for each historian in the system. These objects are created automatically if a historian data definition object is created and assigned to a historian. The data in this object controls the general function of the historian, e.g., where it runs in the system, what its archive policy is, what its data reduction policy is, etc.
5.4 Process Control
5.4.1 Definition of the Process Control Domain
The process control domain is usually divided into three primary control styles: (i) analog control (continuous), (ii) logic control (ladder logic), and (iii) sequential control (supervisory operation of logic and analog control structures). In addition, every process control system must address batch (or recipe based) manufacturing with the related topics of lot tracking and validation.
The illustrated control system 10 views these styles as particular visualizations of the process control functionality. This means that these three types of control do not exist as objects. Rather, the control system receives a class definition of a process control object (PCO) which it instantiates and executes. It is the responsibility of the control editor to create the correct representation of the control structure while also representing that control structure in one of the industry standard formats, i.e., ladder-logic, function blocks, or structured text, or PCOs directly
Sequential Function Charts are a meta-language used to control the execution of the other three languages. In the illustrated embodiment, it serves as a wrapper class for the other classes. The source code for a control scheme and the critical values for its PCO attributes, i.e., its checkpoint file, are held in the non-volatile memory of the Native device.
5.4.2 Process Control Objects
5.4.2.1 PCO Attributes
The fundamental control object is a PCO attribute. As noted above, these are provided in two types: variables and parameters. An example of a variable attribute is a measurement in a PID block. In the illustrated system, a PCO attribute is an object in its own right and it contains certain vital information when it is retrieved. This information is “atomic”, i.e., all information is obtained with an attribute, not just its “value”. The minimal set of information from a PCO variable attribute is value, data type, quality information time tag in milliseconds, and alarm status. It is this object that is transferred from one PCO to another to implement the transfer of information needed in an actual control scheme.
Parameter attributes bundle less information than a variable attribute. The typical example of a parameter attribute is the proportional band of a PID block. In the illustrated control system 10, this attribute has less supporting information than a variable attribute, e.g., it would not have an engineering unit range.
5.4.2.2 PCO Blocks
PCO attributes and methods to operate on those attributes are combined into PCO Blocks. These blocks are analogous to the control blocks in other systems, e.g., I/A Series FoxBlocks, IEC 1131-3 Function Blocks, and Foxboro Microspec Blocks. However, because they are implemented in Java, they can be executed on any microprocessor running any OS that supports a JVM. In addition, they are designed to occupy only the amount of RAM required for the selected options and to be on-line replaceable.
PCO blocks capture and encapsulate knowledge of regulatory control algorithms needed to by continuous processes. The PCO user block can be used to integrate particular user-defined control algorithms into a PCO control scheme. It is the PCO user block that is used to implement control strategies that are defined using one of the IEC 1131-3 control languages.
5.4.2.3 PCO Composites
PCO Composites are implementations of a control strategy. They consist of PCO blocks and other PCO composites linked in such a manner as to provide the control mechanisms needed for a particular process. It is the PCO composite that captures application level control expertise, e.g., complex control structures for major pieces of equipment or even the simpler idioms of cascade control.
5.4.3 PCO Execution Environment
The PCO execution environment is the software in a native control device that supports the execution of PCOs. This software includes the JVM and any other required code, such as a class loader that loads stand-alone applications for each composite, a class loader that loads an applet for each composite, a block processor that loads Java byte codes for a composite and executes each composite in turn, and a block processor that loads Java byte codes for PCO Blocks and executes each blocks in turn.
5.5 Communications
5.5.1 Requirements
5.5.1.1 Communication Model Definition
Several types of communication are provided in the illustrated control system 10. These types include data transfer, message transfer between application programs, object movement (downloads), class file (code) transfers, and events (unsolicited messages).
The communications mechanism is redundant, i.e., the failure of one station in the system does not prevent communication (new or established) between any two other stations. It also minimizes the impact on uninvolved stations when the service is used by its clients, e.g., a message is not sent to a network segment if it is not going to be used there. The communications mechanism, moreover, provides an encapsulated implementation that can be replaced “under the hood” as new technologies become available. Also, it allows the illustrated control system 10 to be configured for the appropriate communication resources, e.g., the number of outbound connections. Moreover, it provides performance statistics, e.g., high, low, average transfer times between two stations, bytes per seconds between two stations, etc., for viewing in the system monitor. Still further, it automatically reconnects to an object if it is relocated on or removed from/restored to the network.
Data transfer in the illustrated control system 10 is provided by a mechanism that permits clients to subscribe to updates in a object. It also provides a mechanism for one-shot get/set access to an object. A client of the data transfer facility supplies the control system with a (i) number of objects that it needs, (ii) conditions under which it wants updates: change delta, maximum time between updates, or both, (iii) be capable of retrieving the values all at once (a snapshot), and (iv) be capable of retrieving the values as series of changes with the option to block, for a user specified amount of time, while waiting for a change. Client publication (write lists) are not supported in the illustrated embodiment. Target devices subscribe to the data in the source device.
With respect to client one-shots (get), the client of the data transfer facility supplies the system with a number of objects that it needs and retrieve the values all at once (a snapshot). Conversely, with respect to client one-shots (set), the client supplies the system with a number of objects that it wishes to change, and set any part of the object if it has access. The parts referred to are the supporting information in a PCO attribute as well as the value part.
5.5.1.1.1 Message Transfer
5.5.1.1.1.1 General
While the message transfer mechanism is a general case of the data transfer mechanism, its requirements are given separately. The client of the message transfer facility must support private conversations between applications using a reliable communications mechanism and support by subscription publication of information from one server to many clients.
5.5.1.1.1.2 Private Conversations
The private conversation mode allows applications to find each other by their application name:
the client application is not required to know the station name or IP address of the server application. It also allow applications to send records (messages) of arbitrary size: the private conversation mode guarantees that the message boundary is recognized and that order is preserved. Moreover, it allows both the sending and receiving process to determine if the connection is lost. Still further, it supports transaction based message transfer, i.e., the sender does not get an acknowledgement until the receiver says that the message is safely stored.
5.5.1.1.1.3 Subscriptions
The subscription facility supports senders and listeners. A sender is a process that has data that may be of interest to one or more listeners. The subscription mode supports this type of operation by allowing a “sending” process to register that it will produce messages of a particular type, allowing a “listening” process to register to receive all messages of a particular type, supporting transaction based subscription if the client so requests (this request would have no impact on the sender), and supporting transaction based publishing by a server if the server requests it (this request would have no impact on the receiver). If no listeners are registered, the subscription facility defines how the message is handled.
5.5.1.2 Security
The native communications system is linked to the native security system to ensure that unauthorized users are unable to access objects. The illustrated control system 10 does not arbitrate between users of a resource. The prevention of multiple access to an object is the responsibility of the object. The breaking of an application secured link by an operator is not a function of the illustrated control system 10.
5.5.1.3 Object Location Services
Object are located by name. To this end, the object location service supports the location of named objects; supports hierarchical object names; allows rule based specification of the name delimiting character; locates an object based on a “longest fit” because (a) not all parts of an object name are globally known and (b) not all parts of an object are in the same physical location; supports the implementation of naming scopes, i.e., limiting the visibility of names; supports the use of a name search path so that relative names can be located; is redundant; supports locating many types of objects, e.g., server processes, PCO attributes, and application programs; and supports the addition of related information about the object in the name directory, e.g., object type, short-cut information to be used by the process that owns the object, object type/implemented interface, and information. With respect to the last item, the object location services permit a client to request the name of a service that supports a specific interface. This allows new interfaces to be added to a service without breaking an old one.
5.5.1.4 Networks
The illustrated control system operates over any IP based network 48. By way of non-limiting example, the illustrated control system 10 operates over wide area networks supplied by the customer, installed plant LANs supplied by the customer, dedicated LANs supplied either by the customer or the vendor, redundant LANs supplied by the vendor. This operation is transparent to all applications using the system 10. While it is recognized that performance are degraded over low bandwidth (phone lines) and high latency (geosynchronous satellites) networks, the system 10 optimizes as best it can to minimize the impact of different network types. In short, the illustrated control system 10 does not assume that it “owns” the network.
5.5.1.5 Quality of Service
5.5.1.5.1 Performance
Assume that the illustrated control system 10 is operating in support of a PCO in a dedicated control station (not a transmitter) or in a PC, it supports at least 10,000 object value gets/sets per second if the object is in the local station; supports at least 100 get/set per second requests from a client if the object is in a remote station; supports at least 50 get/set requests per second made to a server from a remote client; is able to locate 3000 objects per second; is able to detect a communication failure in no more than 1000 milliseconds; ensures that the time to move data from a server station to a client station (API call to API call) is less than 100 milliseconds in a normally configured network; allows a server station to move 6000 values out of its box every second; allows a client station to accept at least 2000 values every second; allows an unlimited (but, configured) number of names to be defined in the system; and supports the registration of 50,000 globally known names without requiring a reconfiguration. All server stations are able to support at least 30 client stations for continuous data feed without requiring a reconfiguration. All client stations support at least 30 server stations for continuous data feeds without requiring a reconfiguration.
5.5.1.6 APIs
Within the illustrated control system 10 environment an API are provided for all of the above services. This API are delivered as a Java Bean so that the underlying communications mechanism may be replaced without breaking all of the applications that use the service.
5.5.1.7 Maintenance and Upgrades of Messaging Services
The illustrated control system 10 defines and enforces a mechanism for supporting inter-operability of messages from stations at different versions. A mechanism like interface inheritance is provided, i.e., a message carries in it enough “type” information that the receiving application knows how to “decode” the message even if the receiving application is at a lower level. This adds fields to messages if necessary, but not remove/replace old fields.
5.5.1.8 Integration of Non-Native Based Systems
The illustrated control system 10 supports integration of non-Java applications using appropriate technologies, e.g., CORBA, COM/DCOM/ActiveX, and emulation of APIs. Physical gateways are permitted, but these gateways provide only a minimal amount of configuration.
5.5.1.9 Object Location Service Implementation
5.5.1.9.1 The All Java Approach
5.5.1.9.1.1 Description
JINI and JavaSpaces technologies permit object location within the illustrated system. JINI technology allows native devices to register names in a globally available database. JINI clients can find this database and perform searches against it. JavaSpaces allow a device to register important information in a globally available bulletin board. JavaSpaces provide four simple services: posting, removal, query by example, and notification. The notification feature informs prospective users of a class of objects when such objects are added and removed from the JavaSpace. A JavaSpace handles services like system monitoring.
5.5.1.9.2 The Enhanced Object Manager Approach
5.5.1.9.2.1 Description
As an alternative, an enhanced object manager (EOM) approach to address location and connection of data clients and servers can be utilized as follows:
SNTP (Simple Network Time Protocol) is used to keep operator stations and similar non-process data producers in sync. This protocol is as accurate as 1 ms in a carefully controlled environment, but 50 ms is more common on shared networks. Controllers requiring high accuracy are placed on tightly controlled networks or equipped with an interrupt used to coordinate time updates. In either case, a master timekeeper tied to a well known reliable data source—GPS clock or broadcasted time from the national atomic clocks. This master time keeper generates the interrupt and SNTP. It is built with a highly reliable internal clock so that loss of time feed does not result in significant drift within the Mean Time to Repair (MTTR).
5.6.2 Alarm and Message Management
Alarm and message manage requires that all process alarming to be based on the top-level composite's attributes; that acknowledgments be handled at the composite level; that PCOs, system monitors, and the native human interface a reliable message protocol to send the message to a message management system (MMS); that the MMS is used by end-users to view the current alarm state and the alarm history; and that the MMS use the plant historian to permanently store and archive messages.
To meet the control market's requirement for a message management system, the illustrated control system 10 provides a message management support service (MMSS) in the native devices that are used to deliver messages to a Message Manager. The service operates as follows.
When a client of the MMSS connects to the MMSS server, the MMSS server send any messages in its internal alarm queue that are older than the time of the connection to the client; transmits the alarm state at the time of the connection to the client, and transmit any new messages subsequent to the connection. If the connection to the MMSS client fails, there is no impact on the operation of the control station or the control network; minor delays associated with detecting the loss of connection are generally viewed as acceptable. The MMSS support at least two (2) and, preferably, four simultaneous clients.
The alarm state of a PCO attribute is defined to include block attribute identification (full PATH attribute name, at least); the bad I/O status of the block for I/O attributes; an indication of the alarm status for each alarm type defined for the attribute; the priority, criticality, and acknowledgment status of the attribute; the on/off status of the attribute, i.e., is it updating; the status of the alarm inhibit and alarm disable or alarm option parameters, and the time tag of each alarm event stored within the block, e.g., the into alarm time, the acknowledged time, and the return to normal time. This information is recovered from all currently active alarms.
5.6.2.1 Configuration
5.6.2.1.1 Process Alarms
When a composite is configured, the application engineer specifies which attributes of the PCOs within the composite are to be annunciated. When a composite is placed on line, it notifies the object location service that it exists. A message management service are notified of the new composite and arrange for notification from the device.
5.6.2.1.2 System Alarms and Messages
No user configuration is required to get these alarms into the MMS. The sources of such messages arranges for the appropriate notification.
5.6.2.1.3 Native Operator Actions
No user configuration is required to get these alarms into the MMS. The sources of such messages arranges for the appropriate notification.
5.6.2.2 Native Message Management Service
The MMS are centralized and redundant. It provides a complete alarm state for the plant at any time including startup. It retains a message history for as long as configured through the use of the plant historian. Users view the alarms through to the Alarm Manager.
6 Native Hardware SubSystems
6.1 Field Devices
6.1.1 Overview
The native field devices are coupled to the network 48 via an IP network, preferably, Ethernet and, still more preferably, powered Ethernet. Powered Ethernet delivers the power, along with conventional Ethernet data. To this end, the native field devices use one of two wiring schemes, with each scheme supplying power to the field device: (a) standard four wire 10Base-T wiring, or (b) industry standard two-wires used for 4-20 ma based transmitters. The devices also provide a single Ethernet interface (or redundancy, where desired in the cabling or the field device); and connect to a non-redundant powered hub with the following features: (a) non-redundant connections to the IFDs; and (b) support for redundant connection to a plant-wide network. Where used, the powered Ethernet implementation leaves the physical and logical Ethernet interfaces in place. This means that except for adding a new wiring type, the physical layer, the data link layer, the use of CSMA/CD, and 10Base-T connectors are preserved.
The illustrated embodiment utilizes powered Ethernet hubs to provide communications and power to its intelligent field devices. These IFDs may be transmitters, actuators, Networked I/O, or PCO platforms. The powered hubs are preferably, stackable, DIN rail-mountable, support connection to a redundant network, and support both 10 Mbps and 100 Mbps Ethernet.
A further understanding of the operated of the powered Ethernet network and of the circuitry used within the native field and control devices to draw power therefrom may be attained by reference to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/444,827, filed Nov. 22, 1999, entitled POWERED ETHERNET FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,640,308), and by reference to the corresponding PCT Patent Application US00/10013, filed Apr. 14, 2000, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference, and a copy of which is attached as an appendix hereto.
On the software side, specific implementations of the native field devices support web based configuration, as described above. The support is supplied by including an embedded web server with a selection of pages used for configuration and maintenance.
6.1.2 Transmitters
Intelligent transmitters use the IEEE 1451 standard to communicate to their sensor(s). This facilitates use of the same module in many types of transmitters from potentially many vendors and allows the transmitter to support up to 255, perhaps externally mounted, sensing devices.
6.1.3 Positioners
The native intelligent positioners also support a powered Ethernet interface like the one used by the native intelligent transmitters.
6.2 Summary of Hardware/Software Features by Station Type
A summary of the features of native control devices follows. Blank cells indicate that the feature is not present in the indicated device.
Described above are apparatus and methods that achieve the goals of the invention. It will be appreciated that the embodiments described herein are examples and that other embodiment incorporating changes thereto also fall within the scope of invention. Thus, by way of example, it will be appreciated that the invention can be implemented using a virtual machine environment other than JVM and using bytecode other than Java bytecode. By way of further example, it will be appreciated that the apparatus and methods taught herein can be applied to a range of control application, in addition to process control.
This application is a divisional of Ser. No. 11/354,586, filed Feb. 14, 2006, entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROL USING CONTROL DEVICES THAT PROVIDE A VIRTUAL MACHINE ENVIRONMENT AND THAT COMMUNICATE VIA AN IP NETWORK (the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference), which is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/756,187, filed Jan. 13, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,020,532 entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROL USING CONTROL DEVICES THAT PROVIDE A VIRTUAL MACHINE ENVIRONMENT AND THAT COMMUNICATE VIA AN IP NETWORK (the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference), which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/591,604, filed Jun. 9, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,788,980 entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROL USING CONTROL DEVICES THAT PROVIDE A VIRTUAL MACHINE ENVIRONMENT AND THAT COMMUNICATE VIA AN IP NETWORK (the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference), which claims the priority of the following United States Patent Applications: U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/139,071, entitled OMNIBUS AND WEB CONTROL, filed Jun. 11, 1999; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/144,693, entitled OMNIBUS AND WEB CONTROL, filed Jul. 20, 1999; U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/149,276, entitled METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESS CONTROL (“AUTOARCHITECTURE”), filed Aug. 17, 1999; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/345,215, entitled PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH IMPROVED DISTRIBUTION, INSTALLATION, AND VALIDATION OF COMPONENTS, filed Jun. 30, 1999, the teachings of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3096434 | King | Jul 1963 | A |
| 3404264 | Kugler | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3665172 | Spaargaren et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3701280 | Stroman | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3802590 | Culver | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3810119 | Zieve et al. | May 1974 | A |
| 3825905 | Allen, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3959772 | Wakasa et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 4006464 | Landell | Feb 1977 | A |
| RE29383 | Gallatin et al. | Sep 1977 | E |
| 4058975 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4096566 | Borie et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4276593 | Hansen | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4302820 | Struger et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4312068 | Goss et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4323966 | Whiteside et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4347563 | Paredes et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4351023 | Richer | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4377000 | Staab | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4410942 | Milligan et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4413314 | Slater et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4423486 | Berner | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4428044 | Liron | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4435762 | Milligan et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4443861 | Slater | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4456997 | Spitza et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4466098 | Southard | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4471457 | Videki, II | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4488226 | Wagner, Jr. et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4493027 | Katz et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4530234 | Cullick et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4609995 | Hasebe et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4612620 | Davis et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4615001 | Hudgins, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4628437 | Poschmann et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4633217 | Akano et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4639852 | Motomiya et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4641269 | Japenga et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4641276 | Dunki-Jacobs | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4648064 | Morley | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4649479 | Advani et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4663704 | Jones et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4672530 | Schuss | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4675812 | Capowski et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4682158 | Ito et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4682304 | Tierney | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4683530 | Quatse | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4692859 | Ott | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4692918 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4703421 | Abrant et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4704676 | Flanagan et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4709325 | Yajima et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4719593 | Threewitt et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4727477 | Gavril | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4733366 | Deyesso et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4740955 | Litterer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4742349 | Miesterfeld et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4750109 | Kita et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4770841 | Haley et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4790762 | Harms et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4800512 | Busch | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4805107 | Kieckhafer et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4806905 | McGowan, III et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4816996 | Hill et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817094 | Lebizay et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4839854 | Sakami et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4872106 | Slater | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4885707 | Nichol et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4896290 | Rhodes et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4897777 | Janke et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| RE33162 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1990 | E |
| 4910658 | Dudash et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4910691 | Skeirik | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4918690 | Markkula, Jr. et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4924462 | Sojka | May 1990 | A |
| 4926158 | Zeigler | May 1990 | A |
| 4934196 | Romano | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4940974 | Sojka | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4958277 | Hill et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4959774 | Davis | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4965717 | Cutts, Jr. et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4965742 | Skeirik | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4965880 | Petitjean et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4991076 | Zifferer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4991170 | Kem | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5008805 | Fiebig et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5050165 | Yoshioka et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5068778 | Kosem et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5089927 | Bulan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089974 | Demeyer et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5109692 | Fitzgerald | May 1992 | A |
| 5121318 | Lipner et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122948 | Zapolin | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5124908 | Broadbent | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5129087 | Will | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131092 | Sackmann et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134574 | Beaverstock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5136704 | Danielsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5138708 | Vosbury | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140677 | Fleming et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5146589 | Peet, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5150289 | Badavas | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151930 | Hagl | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151978 | Bronikowski et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151981 | Westcott et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5159673 | Sackmann et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5162986 | Graber et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163055 | Lee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5164894 | Cunningham-Reid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5166685 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167009 | Skeirik | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5168276 | Huston et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5168441 | Onarheim et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5170340 | Prokop et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175698 | Barbanell | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175829 | Stumpf et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5181978 | Ochiai et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5193175 | Cutts, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197114 | Skeirik | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5202961 | Mills et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212784 | Sparks | May 1993 | A |
| 5218187 | Koenck et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224203 | Skeirik | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5233615 | Goetz | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5245704 | Weber et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5249274 | Sztipanovits et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5251125 | Karnowski et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255367 | Bruckert et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5257208 | Brown et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5258999 | Wernimont et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5271013 | Gleeson | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5276901 | Howell et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5283729 | Lloyd | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289365 | Caldwell et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5291390 | Satou et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295258 | Jewett et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295263 | Kojima et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297143 | Fridrich et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5301346 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5302952 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5303227 | Herold et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5303375 | Collins et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5303392 | Carney et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5307346 | Fieldhouse et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5307372 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5307463 | Hyatt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5309556 | Sismilich | May 1994 | A |
| 5310998 | Okuno | May 1994 | A |
| 5317726 | Horst | May 1994 | A |
| 5325339 | Yost et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5327144 | Stilp et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5335186 | Tarrant | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5335221 | Snowbarger et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5339362 | Harris | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5339680 | Bronkal et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347181 | Ashby et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5349343 | Oliver | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5349678 | Morris et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352033 | Gresham et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5353217 | Berghs et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5359721 | Kempf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5361198 | Harmon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367640 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371895 | Bristol | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5377315 | Leggett et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5381529 | Matsushima et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5384910 | Torres | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386417 | Daugherty et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5390321 | Proesel | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392280 | Zheng | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392389 | Fleming | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394522 | Sanchez-Frank et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5398331 | Huang et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5400140 | Johnston et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405779 | McCabe et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5408603 | Van de Lavoir et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410141 | Koenck et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410492 | Gross et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410717 | Floro | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5420977 | Sztipanovits et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5421017 | Scholz et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5422816 | Sprague et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426732 | Boies et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428734 | Haynes et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428769 | Glaser et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428781 | Duault et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5432705 | Severt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5432711 | Jackson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434952 | Yen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434997 | Landry et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437007 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440237 | Brown et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442791 | Wrabetz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444851 | Woest | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444861 | Adamec et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450403 | Ichii et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450425 | Gunn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450764 | Johnston et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5451923 | Seberger et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5451939 | Price et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452201 | Pieronek et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453933 | Wright et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5457797 | Butterworth et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459825 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459839 | Swarts et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5461611 | Drake, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5461710 | Bloomfield et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5463735 | Pascucci et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5467264 | Rauch et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469150 | Sitte | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469570 | Shibata | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481715 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5481718 | Ryu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5481741 | McKaskle et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5483660 | Yishay et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485617 | Stutz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485620 | Sadre et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5490276 | Doli, Jr. et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491625 | Pressnall et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491791 | Glowney et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5493534 | Mok | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5499023 | Goldschmidt | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499365 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499371 | Henninger et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500934 | Austin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501608 | Scheer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504672 | Hardiman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5504895 | Kurosawa et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5504902 | McGrath et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509811 | Homic | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5513095 | Pajonk et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5513192 | Janku et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5513354 | Dwork et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5517645 | Stutz et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5517655 | Collins et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519605 | Cawlfield | May 1996 | A |
| 5519701 | Colmant et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522044 | Pascucci et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5526287 | French | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5526353 | Henley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530377 | Walls | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530643 | Hodorowski | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530868 | Record et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5531328 | Rochelo et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534912 | Kostreski | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5535425 | Watanabe | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5537548 | Fin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539638 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539909 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541810 | Donhauser et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542039 | Brinson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544008 | Dimmick et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544073 | Piety et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544321 | Theimer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548528 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549137 | Lenz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550980 | Pascucci et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551047 | Mori et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555213 | DeLong | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555416 | Owens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555437 | Packer | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555510 | Verseput et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5557559 | Rhodes | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559691 | Monta et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559963 | Gregg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561770 | de Bruijn et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563400 | Le Roux | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5564055 | Ashaashari et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5566320 | Hubert et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568378 | Wojsznis | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5572643 | Judson | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5572673 | Shurts | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576946 | Bender et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579220 | Barthel et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579487 | Meyerson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581760 | Atkinson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586066 | White et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586112 | Tabata et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586156 | Gaubatz | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586329 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586330 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587899 | Ho et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594858 | Blevins | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594899 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596331 | Bonaffini et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596752 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598536 | Slaughter, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598566 | Pascucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600845 | Gilson | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602749 | Vosburgh | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604737 | Iwami et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604871 | Pecone | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608607 | Dittmer | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5608608 | Flint et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5611057 | Pecone et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613148 | Bezviner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613164 | DiAngelo et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613190 | Hylton | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617540 | Civanlar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5621871 | Jaremko et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5621890 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623592 | Carlson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623670 | Bohannon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627979 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5629872 | Gross et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5629949 | Zook | May 1997 | A |
| 5630056 | Horvath et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5630152 | DeLuca et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633811 | Canada et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5642259 | Ma | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642511 | Chow et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5648768 | Bouve | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649121 | Budman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5655092 | Ojala et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659680 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659727 | Velissaropoulos et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5664101 | Picache | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5664168 | Yishay et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671374 | Postman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671436 | Morris et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5673401 | Volk et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5676141 | Hollub | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680404 | Gray et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680409 | Qin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682317 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682476 | Tapperson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687316 | Graziano et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5691897 | Brown et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5700090 | Eryurek | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701414 | Cheng et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701484 | Artsy | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704011 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5708709 | Rose | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5708779 | Graziano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713045 | Berdahl | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5715178 | Scarola et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5716221 | Kantner | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717880 | Imai et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717925 | Harper et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719761 | Gatti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724025 | Tavori | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726911 | Canada et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726912 | Krall, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727128 | Morrison | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732074 | Spaur et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732218 | Bland et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734902 | Atkins et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737529 | Dolin, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740429 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740441 | Yellin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742596 | Baratz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742762 | Scholl et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745049 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746511 | Eryurek et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748467 | Qin et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748896 | Daly et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748912 | Lee | May 1998 | A |
| 5751574 | Loebig et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5752007 | Morrison | May 1998 | A |
| 5752008 | Bowling | May 1998 | A |
| 5752246 | Rogers et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754189 | Doi et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754772 | Leaf | May 1998 | A |
| 5754830 | Butts et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757925 | Faybishenko | May 1998 | A |
| 5758073 | Liang et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758075 | Graziano et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761033 | Wilhelm | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761090 | Gross et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761405 | Tadamura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761421 | van Hoff et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761477 | Wahbe et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761499 | Sonderegger | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761518 | Boehling et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5764906 | Edelstein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768119 | Havekost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768510 | Gish | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774378 | Yang | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774670 | Montulli | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777874 | Flood et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778368 | Hogan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784557 | Oprescu | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786119 | Sorriero et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787247 | Norin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787272 | Gupta et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787280 | Joseph et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790791 | Chong et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5793963 | Tapperson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794071 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796602 | Wellan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797038 | Crawford et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801770 | Paff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5801942 | Nixon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5802389 | McNutt | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805153 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805889 | Van De Vanter | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805922 | Sim et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809247 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812394 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815152 | Collier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815659 | Umetsu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815710 | Martin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822220 | Baines | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828851 | Nixon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828882 | Hinckley | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5831669 | Adrain | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832268 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832418 | Meyer | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835704 | Li et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835712 | DuFresne | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835724 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835789 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838563 | Dove et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838910 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838920 | Rosborough | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838969 | Jacklin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839094 | French | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841360 | Binder | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841654 | Verissimo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841963 | Nakamikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841991 | Russell | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844601 | McPheely et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5844796 | Araki | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5844804 | Schussler | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5845078 | Tezuka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5845230 | Lamberson | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5847957 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848274 | Hamby et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848393 | Goodridge et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854750 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854944 | Catherwood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859966 | Hayman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5862052 | Nixon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864773 | Barna et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867704 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872992 | Tietjen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873089 | Regache | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874990 | Kato et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875430 | Koether | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876122 | Eryurek | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5878415 | Olds | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880775 | Ross | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884014 | Huttenlocher et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5903455 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5903894 | Reneris | May 1999 | A |
| 5905248 | Russell et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5905963 | Lysejko | May 1999 | A |
| 5907675 | Aahlad | May 1999 | A |
| 5909368 | Nixon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909586 | Anderson | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917822 | Lyles et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917840 | Cheney et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5920479 | Sojoodi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922050 | Madany | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5927398 | Maciulewicz | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928345 | Tetzlaff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930768 | Hooban | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935242 | Madany et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935249 | Stern et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940294 | Dove | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940839 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5946487 | Dangelo | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950006 | Crater et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956487 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959487 | Kawamura | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960205 | Mao et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960214 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966304 | Cook et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5969967 | Aahlad et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974497 | Teshome | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5975737 | Crater et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978578 | Azarya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978933 | Wyld et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980078 | Krivoshein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980090 | Royal, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5982362 | Crater et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5982762 | Anzai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987506 | Carter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5988852 | Nakanishi | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991795 | Howard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994998 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995916 | Nixon et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002104 | Hsu | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006164 | McCarty et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006171 | Vines et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008985 | Lake et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009103 | Woundy | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014591 | Ikeda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014612 | Larson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016515 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018627 | Iyengar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018816 | Tateyama | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6026336 | Sakurai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026352 | Burns et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032151 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032208 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| H1845 | Kelly | Mar 2000 | H |
| 6033257 | Lake et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6035264 | Donaldson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038271 | Olaker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038486 | Saitoh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044305 | Larson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049578 | Senechal et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049775 | Gertner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052629 | Leatherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055633 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6061603 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070186 | Nishio et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070250 | Yeager et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073109 | Flores et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6075863 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6076124 | Korowitz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078320 | Dove et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078848 | Bernstein et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080207 | Kroening et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085120 | Schwerdtfeger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088665 | Burns et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094655 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094684 | Pallmann | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095674 | Verissimo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6097761 | Buhring et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6098116 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104391 | Johnston, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104875 | Gallagher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105132 | Fritch et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108662 | Hoskins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112020 | Wright | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112246 | Horbal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115468 | De Nicolo | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6115744 | Robins et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6129449 | McCain et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129724 | Fleischman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131067 | Girerd et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6133914 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6134559 | Brumme et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6138140 | Yokote | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6138174 | Keeley | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139177 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140911 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141794 | Dice et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6148346 | Hanson | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148391 | Petrick | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151625 | Swales et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154875 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157864 | Schwenke et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160484 | Spahl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167253 | Farris et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167464 | Kretschmann | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6170007 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173414 | Zumkehr et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6175556 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6176421 | Royal, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183289 | Lake et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6185611 | Waldo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195694 | Chen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195774 | Jacobson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199068 | Carpenter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6199195 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6201996 | Crater et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212440 | Suzuki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212575 | Cleron et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212608 | Bak | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216158 | Luo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218930 | Katzenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219708 | Martenson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226783 | Limondin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236909 | Colson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246748 | Yano et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260187 | Cirne | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263487 | Stripf et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266716 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266724 | Harari et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268789 | Diamant et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269473 | Freed et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272529 | Lum | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6272556 | Gish | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282454 | Papadopoulos et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282455 | Engdahl | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285966 | Brown et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289299 | Daniel, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295356 | De Nicolo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295513 | Thackston | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298377 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308317 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311101 | Kastner | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314448 | Conner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314464 | Murata et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6317701 | Pyotsia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324607 | Korowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327511 | Naismith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332163 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334161 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336142 | Kato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345295 | Beardsley et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6345382 | Hughes | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6348874 | Cole et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349274 | Kay et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349287 | Hayashi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353859 | McKeehan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6353860 | Hare et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360091 | Schellinger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366300 | Ohara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370448 | Eryurek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370573 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373841 | Goh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377543 | Grover et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6382226 | Larson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393050 | Liu | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405099 | Nagai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405210 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6412070 | Van Dyke et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6418499 | Korowitz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6424883 | Hosokawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429885 | Saib et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6430564 | Judge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434594 | Wesemann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438182 | Olaker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442442 | Weinhofer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445962 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449624 | Hammack et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449715 | Krivoshein | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6480903 | Voutaz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480955 | DeKoning et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487214 | Bachar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487558 | Hitchcock | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493405 | Olaker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496892 | Lake et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499048 | Williams | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6501995 | Kinney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6510352 | Badavas et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6526455 | Kamimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526516 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6532531 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6557056 | Lanteigne et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6563420 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6574515 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6574694 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6594692 | Reisman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598224 | Maeda et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6609147 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6612022 | Gale et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6618754 | Gosling | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622147 | Smiga et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6636900 | Abdelnur | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6640308 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647495 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654353 | Tokura et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6671763 | Korowitz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6675193 | Slavin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687698 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6700869 | Falco et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6701284 | Huntley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6718215 | Friedrich et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6718533 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6738388 | Stevenson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6754885 | Dardinski et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760687 | Apel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6763370 | Schmeidler et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6775707 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6788980 | Johnson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6789054 | Makhlouf | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792321 | Sepe, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6799148 | Ling et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6799185 | Wallman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6799195 | Thibault et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6806847 | Nixon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807558 | Hassett et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6826590 | Glanzer et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6832223 | Scheifler et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6850973 | Larson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6853867 | Klindt et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6868538 | Nixon et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6874082 | Tateyama et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6888541 | Morse | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6895409 | Uluakar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6928396 | Thackston | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6959356 | Packwood et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6978194 | McIlhany et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6983227 | Thalhammer-Reyero | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7020532 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7024282 | Coogan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7032045 | Kostadinov | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7054793 | Moritz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7080366 | Kramskoy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7086009 | Resnick et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7089530 | Dardinski et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7096465 | Dardinski et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7110835 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7123974 | Hamilton | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7142322 | Lee | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7146231 | Schleiss et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146408 | Crater et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7151966 | Baier et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7158513 | Wada et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7162510 | Jammes | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7177052 | Lapstun et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7199784 | Mathiowetz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7245271 | Nixon et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249330 | Roesner et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7272815 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7275062 | Deitz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7337256 | Korowitz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7356588 | Stineman, Jr. et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7502656 | Thibault et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7574693 | Kemink | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7610354 | Adams et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7664574 | Imhof et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7720944 | Thibault et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7739361 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7882197 | Thibault et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890927 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899070 | Thibault et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 20010007133 | Moriconi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010007183 | Weder | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010025307 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034777 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034778 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034779 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034780 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034781 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037489 | Stripf et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044836 | Venkatraman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052109 | Nagashima et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013629 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049865 | Charnell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067370 | Forney et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020093980 | Trebes | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133636 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020150156 | Calvin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165848 | Rautenbach et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194393 | Hrischuk et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198920 | Resnick et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009250 | Resnick et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051068 | Eldridge | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115238 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167269 | Gupta | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200351 | O'Connor et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200369 | Musumeci | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208558 | Venkatraman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040103165 | Nixon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117534 | Parry et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221289 | D'Souza et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050138226 | Tateyama et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149893 | Roesner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160263 | Naizhen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050172258 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283730 | Uyttendaele et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060129724 | Kostadinov | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206860 | Dardinski et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206866 | Eldrige et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212146 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070006149 | Resnick et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070019560 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061786 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083552 | Allen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110835 | Maes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118805 | Kraus et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244571 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265089 | Robarts et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080040477 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046598 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052386 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119951 | Thibault et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120367 | Thibault et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126500 | Thibault et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133700 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134215 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080148170 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216169 | Naizhen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222276 | Thibault et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090094326 | Thibault et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118845 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118846 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125128 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125129 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125130 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125131 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132996 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164031 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193347 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090241086 | Saito et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259751 | Thibault et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319058 | Rovaglio et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005425 | Kodosky et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011127 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011311 | Kodosky et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076604 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121999 | Isenmann et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131084 | Van Camp | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222902 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223593 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305720 | Doll et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305721 | Kostadinov et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110040390 | Blevins et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093098 | Kostadinov et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0411869 | Feb 1991 | EP |
| 0592921 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0640905 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0660231 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0906595 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 1006691 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 02159526 | Jun 1990 | JP |
| 09033647 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| 10019655 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 11143511 | May 1999 | JP |
| WO-9114324 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| WO-9504314 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO-9623377 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| WO-9631047 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO-9707486 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO-9726587 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO-9820649 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO-9829804 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO-9836518 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO-9854843 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-0077592 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO-03039098 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2010138412 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080040477 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60139071 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60144693 | Jul 1999 | US | |
| 60149276 | Aug 1999 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11354586 | Feb 2006 | US |
| Child | 11781219 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10756187 | Jan 2004 | US |
| Child | 11354586 | US | |
| Parent | 09591604 | Jun 2000 | US |
| Child | 10756187 | US |
