Methods and apparatus for counter-current leaching of finely divided solids

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9931584
  • Patent Number
    9,931,584
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 29, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 3, 2018
    6 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 196 014520
    • 196 046000
    • 208 177000
    • 208 187000
    • 208 299000
    • 208 301000
    • 208 302000
    • 208 303000
    • 208 305000
    • 210 634000
    • 210 663000
    • 210 669000
    • 210 670000
    • 210 675000
    • 210 800-802
    • 210 804000
    • 210 806000
    • 210 259-261
    • 210 263000
    • 210 264000
    • 210 265000
    • 210 511000
    • 210 513000
    • 210 521000
    • 210 522000
    • 423 024000
    • 423 027000
    • 423 031000
    • 423 063000
    • 423 068000
    • 423 070000
    • 423 074000
    • 423 086000
    • 423 112000
    • 423 131000
    • 423 139000
    • 423 150100
    • 423 150200
    • 423 157000
    • 423 181000
    • 423 205000
    • 423 208000
    • 423 658500
    • CPC
    • B01D11/02
    • B01D11/0223
    • B01D11/0242
    • B01D11/0253
    • B01D11/028
    • B01D11/0284
    • B01D21/00
    • B01D21/0039
    • B01D21/0042
    • B01D21/0045
    • B01D21/24
    • B01D21/245
    • C10G1/04
    • C10G1/047
    • C10G53/04
    • C10G53/08
    • C10G73/06
    • C10G73/26
    • C10G73/40
    • C10G73/42
    • C22B3/00
    • C22B3/0001
    • C22B3/0002
    • C22B3/0004
    • C22B3/0005
    • C22B3/0098
    • C22B3/02
    • C22B3/04
    • C22B3/20
    • C22B3/22
    • C22B3/42
    • C22B15/0065
    • C22B23/0407
    • C22B23/0453
    • C22B60/0221
  • International Classifications
    • B01D11/02
    • B01D21/00
    • B01D21/24
    • Term Extension
      240
Abstract
This disclosure describes systems, methods, and apparatus for counter-current solids leaching. A multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber can include a top and bottom end, a barren liquor input, two or more regions for countercurrent mixing, and a barren solids output. The input can be configured to receive barren liquor. The two or more regions for countercurrent mixing and separation can be configured to mix and separate liquid and solid phases. The barren solids output can be configured to collect and discharge barren solids from the bottom end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber. A fluidized bed chamber and clarifier chamber can also be included, where the fluidized bed receives a fluidizable slurry of pregnant solids and the clarifier chamber aids in separating liquids from solids passing from a top of the fluidized bed chamber to the top end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates generally to solid waste treatment. In particular, but not by way of limitation, the present disclosure relates to systems, methods and apparatuses for separation and removal of soluble species from insoluble, finely divided dry solids, or finely divided solids present in the form of paste, sludge, or slurry.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Drilling for oil and gas produces large quantities of drill cuttings and drilling fluids that are comprised of mixtures of finely divided solids (silt, clay, pulverized formation minerals, barite, etc.) that are often saturated with, or suspended in, salt brine and/or organic liquid. These drilling residues require expensive disposal to protect human health and the environment.


When deposited on the landscape or simply buried, drilling residues pose unacceptable environmental hazards due to leaching of salt and organic species by water from natural precipitation that leads to ground- and surface water contamination. Attempts to stabilize drilling residue by addition of fly-ash, cement kiln dust, or other solidifying agents before burial, also have proven ineffectual and unsatisfactory largely because the salts and organic species remain leachable. Consequently, the current primary means of disposal of drilling residues is solidification, transport, and disposal in a hazardous waste landfill.


Solidification of oily drilling residues is most often accomplished by centrifugation or thermal desorption to remove the organic phase. Residual solids from centrifugation contain both leachable organic and inorganic (salt) species. Residual solids from thermal desorption also contain leachable salts. These solidified residues cannot be land-disposed on-site and must, instead, be transported and disposed at a hazardous waste landfill incurring substantial additional costs.


Solidification of drilling residues comprised of brine muds and cuttings is most often accomplished by addition of drying agents such as fly-ash or cement kiln dust. These means of solidification of drilling residue increase both the mass and volume of material that must be transported and disposed in a landfill, which increases both transportation and disposal costs.


In order to avoid the expense and liabilities associated with transportation and landfilling of hazardous drilling residues, it is desirable to render said residues suitable for land-spreading or other means of on-site disposal. On-site disposal of drilling residues requires means to separate soluble or leachable salts from finely divided dry solids or finely divided solids present in the form of paste, sludge, or slurry.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that the greatest impediment to efficient leaching or washing of fine solids is caused by the amount of interstitial liquor present in saturated fine sediments and the difficulty of separating said interstitial liquor from the surrounding fine solids.


Settled, saturated fine solids derived from drilling with salt brine muds exhibit void fractions in the range from about 40% to 55% yielding mass fractions of interstitial liquid in the range from about 20% to 35% depending on solids particulate density and concentration of salt in the interstitial liquor. If the salt concentration in the interstitial liquor is near saturation, say 24% by mass, then batch-wise washing or dilution with fresh water implies consumption of very large quantities of salt-free water in order to render saturated solids containing acceptably low concentrations (<1,000 mg/kg) of salt as required for on-site disposal.


For example, if an aliquot of saturated cuttings exhibiting a settled void volume of 40% is washed with a void volume of salt free water, the settled residue after washing will exhibit interstitial fluid having one-half the initial concentration of salt. Each successive washing stage will reduce the concentration of salt in the interstitial fluid by half again. Therefore, it would require 7 stages of washing, settling and decanting to reduce the concentration of salt from saturation (240,000 mg/L) to below 2,000 mg/L in the final interstitial fluid. Total wash water consumption would be 2.8 volumes per volume of saturated solids treated.


For on-site treatment, where fresh water needs to be transported to the site, using minimum wash water is an economic and logistical imperative. Analysis shows that the total amount of wash water needed to achieve a specified degree of salt removal is inversely proportional to the number of washing stages used. Furthermore, the minimum mass ratio of wash water to solids treated for a specified degree of salt removal is achieved by using a true counter-current, multistage, contacting regime. An additional advantage of using minimum wash water is that lower volumes of higher-concentration pregnant liquor are produced. Since high concentration dense brine has value in the oil field, the counter-current cuttings leaching system has the potential to greatly reduce disposal costs, or produce a merchantable product from drilling residues.


Disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for accomplishing true counter-current, multistage, washing and leaching, to remove soluble salts from finely divided dry solids, or finely divided solids present in the form of paste, sludge, or slurry, while producing a low volume of high concentration pregnant liquor for re-use or sale.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that disclosed methods and apparatus may be applied to other industrial separations, including but not limited to, decontamination of soils, mineral and ore beneficiation, recovery of fertilizer values from cement kiln dust, recovery of chemical values from waste solids, regeneration of ion exchange resins and adsorption media, and performing numerous liquid/solid and liquid/liquid extractions.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention that are shown in the drawings are summarized below. These and other embodiments are more fully described in the Detailed Description section. It is to be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the forms described in this Summary of the Invention or in the Detailed Description. One skilled in the art can recognize that there are numerous modifications, equivalents and alternative constructions that fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as expressed in the claims.


Some embodiments of the disclosure may be characterized as an apparatus for leaching fine solids. The apparatus can include a multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber having: a top end; a bottom end; a barren liquor input configured to receive barren liquor; two or more regions for countercurrent mixing and separation of liquid and solid phases; and a barren solids output configured to collect and discharge barren solids from the bottom end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber. The apparatus can also include a fluidized bed chamber with a top and bottom end, and joined at its top end with the top end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber, the fluidized bed chamber including a pregnant solids input configured to receive a fluidizable slurry of pregnant solids. The apparatus can further include a clarifier chamber with a top and a bottom end, and joined at its bottom to the top end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber and the top end of the fluidized bed chamber.


Other embodiments of the disclosure may be characterized as a method for leaching fine solids. The method can include receiving barren liquor and pregnant solids near a bottom of a fluidized bed to form a mixture. The method can also include fluidizing the mixture to form a fluidized mixture that moves toward a top of the fluidized bed. The method can yet further include the fluidized mixture entering a region near a top of the fluidized bed that is shared with a top of a multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber, the region having a larger cross section than a cross section of either the fluidized bed or the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber alone. Yet further, the method can include receiving a leach or wash solution near a bottom of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber. Additionally, the method can include allowing the pregnant solids to descend within the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber via the force of gravity. Yet further, the method can include separating solids and liquids via multiple mixing and separating stages of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber. Moreover, the method can include collecting and discharging barren solids from a bottom of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber. Finally, the method can include collecting and discharging pregnant liquor from a clarifier arranged atop both the fluidized bed and the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

Various objects and advantages and a more complete understanding of the present disclosure are apparent and more readily appreciated by referring to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a counter-current solids leaching system.



FIG. 2 shows an integrated process flow diagram using the counter-current solids leaching system for treating drill cuttings.



FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of a method for counter-current solids leaching.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a counter-current flow, solids leaching system 100 comprised of a multistage leaching chamber 101 fitted with inter-stage thickener plates 102, and separated from a fluidized bed 103 by a vertical overflow weir 106. The leaching chamber 101 and fluidized bed 103 are connected at their upper end to a sedimentation clarifier 105.


Pregnant solids are fed to the lower portion of the fluidized bed 103 where they are fluidized by recycled fluidizing liquor that is introduced to the bottom of the fluidized bed chamber via a fluidizing liquor distributor 104. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the fluidizing liquor distributor 104, without limitation, may be selected from the group consisting of screens, perforated plates, perforated tubes, sintered metal or plastic plates, tuyer plates, bubble cap plates, dense media, and open tubes.


Fluidized solids rise vertically in the fluidized bed 103 and are transported to the region of the top of the overflow weir 106 where the superficial velocity of the fluidizing liquor is reduced below the minimum fluidizing velocity for the solids. The reduction in fluidizing velocity occurs as the fluidized bed expands into the increased cross section provided by the combined leaching chamber 101 and fluidized bed 103.


The clarifier 105 further increases the cross section and reduces the upward component of velocity of the up-welling fluidizing liquor such that all but the finest particles settle by gravity into the leaching chamber 101.


Solids slide down the inclined thickener plates 102 to the plate gaps and fall over the plate precipice in a thin sheet. The downward velocity of the falling sheet is much greater than the Stokes settling velocity of any individual particle in the sheet. The falling sheet of solids is intercepted by counter flowing leach or wash solution, having a substantial horizontal streamline component. The wash water partially fragments the falling sheet of solids and pushes it toward the outside wall of the leaching chamber 101. Near the wall, the wash solution streamline is forced back to upward vertical, creating a shear zone, in the thickener plate gap, between the falling and fragmenting sheet of solids and the rising wash water stream. Some of the falling solids are re-entrained by the upward flow of wash water and are carried into the interstitial volume above the plate.


The interstitial volume above each thickener plate 102 receives solids falling from the plate above and solids re-entrained by the wash water moving through the plate gap from below. In the interstitial volume above the plate, wash water moves in a substantially horizontal streamline across the column, to the opposing gap, and above the bulk of the disbursed solids. This promotes settling and transport of solids down the plate. Sweep flock settling is the predominant mechanism in this region, with larger flocks and particles, carrying finer materials downward to the thickener plate and occluding them in the sheet discharge. In this manner, the concentration of solids in the region above the plate increases until the settling, transport, and sheet discharge reach steady state equilibrium with the sludge solids feed rate. Each stage provides a turbulent contact zone and a quiescent settling zone. Downward transport of particles is not governed by Stokes law, and the solids loading to the pregnant liquor discharge is determined by the dimensions of the sedimentation clarifier 105.



FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of an integrated process flow diagram 200 for employing the counter-current flow solids leaching system 100 to remove dissolved solids from finely divided drilling residues, also referred to as cuttings.


Cuttings feed in the form of dry solids or solids present as paste, sludge, or slurry are fed to a feed pump 201 where they are comingled and mixed with filter cake from a blowback filter 202 before being fed to the previously disclosed counter-current flow solids leaching system 100.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that the feed pump 201, without limitation, may be selected from the group consisting of high-shear mixers, pug mills, mixing tanks, progressive cavity pumps, rotary lobe pumps, flexible impeller pumps, rotary valves, and centrifugal slurry pumps.


Pregnant liquor discharged from the counter-current flow solids leaching system 100 is filtered using a blow-back filter 202 to produce clarified product brine for beneficial use or disposal, plus a thickened filter cake that is recycled to the feed pump 201.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that the blow-back filter 202, without limitation, may be selected from the group consisting of bag filters, belt filters, filter presses, V-Sep filters, sintered metal filters, ceramic filters, deep bed filters, lamella thickeners, sedimentation clarifiers, electro-coagulation clarifiers, and centrifugal clarifiers.


Recycle of pregnant liquor to the feed pump and fluidized bed concentrates soluble salts in the recycled fluid and maximizes the concentration and specific gravity of the product brine. High specific gravity brines have value in the oil field. In addition, high-concentration brines exhibit reduced volume and reduced cost for transportation and off-site disposal via deep well injection.


Settled, barren solids exiting the bottom of the counter-current flow solids leaching system 100 may be dewatered using a dewatering screw press 203 or other dewatering equipment. Dewatering produces a reduced volume, reduced mass, stackable, easily handled and transported solid residue. Water thus removed from the barren solids may be comingled with the leach or wash solution fed to the leaching system 100 in order to reduce the total fresh solution required for operation of the system.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that the dewatering press 203, without limitation, may be selected from the group consisting of dewatering screw presses, belt filters, pressure filters, V-Sep filters, gas displacement dryers, and centrifugal separators.


Operational Experience


A prototype commercial countercurrent solids leaching system as shown in FIG. 2 has been operated on a drilling site in the Williston basin to treat salt water brine mud cuttings and other solid residues derived from horizontal drilling operations in the Bakken formation. The prototype commercial countercurrent solids leaching system demonstrated removal of 98.8% to 99.4% of chlorides from feed materials containing an average of 57,315 mg Cl/L, and at feed rates as much as 20% above the system design rating. Treated material exhibited chloride concentrations below the regulatory limit for surface application of 250 mg/kg.


The instant invention has been reduced to practice and successfully demonstrated at the prototype commercial scale throughput of 500 lbm/hr, and with feed material-to-fresh water mass ratios in the range from 1.2 to 4.6. Demonstration testing showed that the prototype countercurrent solids leaching system requires from 43% to 85% less fresh water when compared to conventional leaching techniques base on equivalent throughput and salt removal.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for leaching fine solids, the apparatus comprising: a multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber having: a top end;a bottom end;a barren liquor input configured to receive barren liquor in the form of leach or wash solution;two or more regions for countercurrent mixing and separation of liquid and solid phases; anda barren solids output configured to collect and discharge barren solids from the bottom end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber;a fluidized bed chamber with a top and bottom end, and joined at its top end with the top end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber, the fluidized bed chamber including a pregnant solids input configured to receive a fluidizable slurry of pregnant solids; anda clarifier chamber with a top and a bottom end, and joined at its bottom to the top end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber and the top end of the fluidized bed chamber.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluidized bed chamber and the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber are separated by a shared partition wall furnished with an aperture through which solids can move from the fluidized bed chamber and into the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said shared partition wall is furnished with an aperture, near the top of said shared partition wall, said aperture configured to allow transfer of solids at uniform mass flux over the area of the aperture, and from the fluidized bed chamber into the top end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the two or more regions for countercurrent mixing and separation of liquid and solid phases is an arrangement of inclined fixed thickener plates.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein said inclined fixed thickener plates are arranged at an angle with a horizontal.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein said inclined fixed thickener plates are affixed in an alternating array on two opposing inside walls of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber, and spaced such that solids falling from at least a first of the thickener plates will intercept an upper surface of a thickener plate located below and opposite the at least a first of the thickener plates.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the solids falling from the at least a first of the thickener plates intercept the upper surface of the thickener plate below the at least a first of the thickener plates at a point on the thickener plate below that is no greater than one-half of a length of the thickener plate below, wherein the length is measured from an attachment point of the thickener plate below to a side of the leaching chamber.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein given a vertical axis drawn from a bottom end of one of the thickener plates through a point on another thickener plate below and opposing the one of the thickener plates, a distance along this vertical axis between a point where the vertical axis intersects the end of the one of the thickener plates and the point on the another thickener plate is less than 20% of a horizontal distance between the end of the one of the thickener plates and wall of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber opposing the one thickener plate.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the barren solids output is a dewatering screw press.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the dewatering screw press provides barren liquor to the bottom end of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber.
  • 11. A method for leaching fine solids, the method comprising: receiving barren liquor and pregnant solids near a bottom of a fluidized bed to form a mixture;fluidizing the mixture to form a fluidized mixture that moves toward a top of the fluidized bed;the fluidized mixture entering a region near a top of the fluidized bed that is shared with a top of a multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber, the region having a larger cross section than a cross section of either the fluidized bed or the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber alone;receiving a leach or wash solution near a bottom of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber;allowing the pregnant solids to descend within the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber via the force of gravity;separating solids and liquids via multiple mixing and separating stages of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber;collecting and discharging barren solids from a bottom of the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber; andcollecting and discharging pregnant liquor from a clarifier arranged atop both the fluidized bed and the multi-stage countercurrent leaching chamber.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. §119

The present application for patent claims priority to Provisional Application No. 62/114,444 entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COUNTER-CURRENT LEACHING OF FINELY DIVIDED SOLIDS” filed Feb. 10, 2015, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (112)
Number Name Date Kind
1604649 Manning Oct 1926 A
1608661 Nordell Nov 1926 A
1707302 Godsey Apr 1929 A
1740199 Nordell Dec 1929 A
2222828 Guthrie Nov 1940 A
2273557 Bonotto Feb 1942 A
2556480 Miller Jun 1951 A
2585491 Olsen Feb 1952 A
2585492 Olsen Feb 1952 A
2614133 Ockert Oct 1952 A
2631727 Cichelli Mar 1953 A
2666500 Cahn et al. Jan 1954 A
2671714 McIlhenney et al. Mar 1954 A
2673176 Whitney Mar 1954 A
2679539 McKay May 1954 A
2696304 Gilmore Oct 1954 A
2696305 Slover Dec 1954 A
2731149 Findlay Jan 1956 A
2744840 Daniels et al. May 1956 A
2767140 Fitch Oct 1956 A
2773028 Monet Dec 1956 A
2815322 Higgins Dec 1957 A
2852464 Nordell Sep 1958 A
2863829 Henke et al. Dec 1958 A
2866827 Jurgeleit et al. Dec 1958 A
2881127 Hetzel Apr 1959 A
2951036 Bodkin et al. Aug 1960 A
2959542 Pye et al. Nov 1960 A
2963431 Dorn et al. Dec 1960 A
2985589 Broughton et al. May 1961 A
3002922 Baddour Oct 1961 A
3019079 Donohue Jan 1962 A
3084120 Cecil et al. Apr 1963 A
3152072 Yomiyama et al. Oct 1964 A
3193498 Platzer et al. Jul 1965 A
3200067 Levendusky Aug 1965 A
3201491 Stine et al. Aug 1965 A
3207577 Mizuma Sep 1965 A
3215624 Frazer et al. Nov 1965 A
3231492 Stine et al. Jan 1966 A
3264099 Johnson Aug 1966 A
3268605 Boyd, Jr. Aug 1966 A
3298950 Mindler Jan 1967 A
3311552 Staats Mar 1967 A
3378339 Yamashiki Apr 1968 A
3403097 Yamashiki et al. Sep 1968 A
3446357 Gomella May 1969 A
3607740 Akeroyd Sep 1971 A
3679581 Kunz Jul 1972 A
3956115 Arion May 1976 A
3993562 Kashiwabara et al. Nov 1976 A
4035292 Himsley Jul 1977 A
4070281 Tagashira et al. Jan 1978 A
4085042 Misumi et al. Apr 1978 A
4087357 Barrett et al. May 1978 A
4088563 Marquardt May 1978 A
4177144 Hickey Dec 1979 A
4181605 Braswell Jan 1980 A
4202737 Shimizu May 1980 A
4228001 Carlson Oct 1980 A
4229292 Mori et al. Oct 1980 A
4246355 Bolto et al. Jan 1981 A
4279755 Himsley Jul 1981 A
4412866 Schoenrock et al. Nov 1983 A
4412923 Capitani et al. Nov 1983 A
4427639 Himsley Jan 1984 A
4448693 Kiehling et al. May 1984 A
RE31687 Himsley Sep 1984 E
4563337 Kim Jan 1986 A
4604209 Himsley Aug 1986 A
4645595 Kim et al. Feb 1987 A
4652352 Saieva Mar 1987 A
4661258 Phillips Apr 1987 A
4693818 Terrien et al. Sep 1987 A
4740310 Dickey Apr 1988 A
4775484 Schmidt et al. Oct 1988 A
4808317 Berry et al. Feb 1989 A
4842744 Schade Jun 1989 A
4864012 Britt Sep 1989 A
4906361 Arnaud Mar 1990 A
4923615 Mehmet May 1990 A
4923616 Hirata May 1990 A
5066371 DeVoe et al. Nov 1991 A
5124043 Arnaud Jun 1992 A
5126056 Carlson Jun 1992 A
5156736 Schoenrock Oct 1992 A
5232953 Johnson Aug 1993 A
5250273 Hornsey Oct 1993 A
5531902 Gallup Jul 1996 A
5534153 Scott et al. Jul 1996 A
5547551 Bahar et al. Aug 1996 A
5580445 Iwatsuka et al. Dec 1996 A
5580461 Cairns et al. Dec 1996 A
5614100 Gallup Mar 1997 A
5707514 Yamasaki et al. Jan 1998 A
5736052 Concklin Apr 1998 A
5772891 Yamasaki et al. Jun 1998 A
6059974 Scheurman, III May 2000 A
6228257 Arnaud May 2001 B1
6334956 Hanemaaijer Jan 2002 B1
6340427 Fukui et al. Jan 2002 B1
6375851 Sterling et al. Apr 2002 B1
6563010 Liepa May 2003 B1
6576137 Ma Jun 2003 B1
6716344 Bassi Apr 2004 B1
7368059 Drake May 2008 B2
7862715 Drake Jan 2011 B2
8721894 Drake May 2014 B2
9643862 Drake May 2017 B2
20120094364 Lali Apr 2012 A1
20130001136 Adeyinka Jan 2013 A1
20130331632 Drake Dec 2013 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
Savage, Matthew O., “Advisory Action before the Filing of an Appeal Brief re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed Dec. 16, 2009, p. 4, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Appeal Brief Under 37 CFR 41.37 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed May 7, 2010, p. 37, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Grounds of Rejection to be Reviewed on Appeal for the Appeal Brief Previously Submitted on May 7, 2010 Under 37 CFR 41.37”, Jun. 19, 2010, p. 5, Published in: US.
Philar, Ravi, “Office Action in re Canadian Patent Application 2,555,292”, dated Mar. 22, 2012, p. 2, Published in: CA.
Philar, Ravi, “Office Action re Canadian Patent Application 2,555,292”, dated May 16, 2011, p. 3, Published in: CA.
Dekleine, Geoffrey, “Response to Office Action in re Canadian Patent Application 2,555,292”, dated Mar. 22, 2012, p. 2, Published in: CA.
Dekleine, Geoffrey, “Response to Office Action in re Canadian Patent Application 2,555,292”, dated Nov. 16, 2011, p. 7, Published in: CA.
Lowe, Delores, “Notification of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief”, dated May 21, 2010, p. 4, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,296”, dated Jan. 2, 2013, p. 8, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,296”, dated Apr. 9, 2013, p. 25, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,926”, dated Nov. 5, 2013, p. 12, Published in: US.
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,296”, dated Jan. 28, 2013, p. 8, Published in: US.
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,296”, dated May 29, 2013, p. 14, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Office Action in re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, dated Mar. 11, 2009, p. 10, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Office Action in re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, dated Jul. 16, 2008, p. 13, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Office Action in re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, dated Sep. 28, 2007, p. 7, Published in: US.
Savage, Matthew O., “Final Office Action in re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, dated Oct. 7, 2009, p. 12, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed Jan. 7, 2010, p. 12, Published in: US.
Smith, Duane, “Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review”, Jan. 27, 2010, p. 3, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Response to Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2007 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed Jan. 5, 2008, p. 15, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Response to Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2009 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed Jul. 10, 2009, p. 23, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Response to Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2009 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed Dec. 7, 2009, p. 21, Published in: US.
O'Dowd, Sean R., “Response to Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2008 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/052,409”, filed Dec. 16, 2008, p. 18, Published in: US.
Drake, Ron, “Inventor Supplemental Declaration”, Dec. 16, 2009, p. 2, Published in: US.
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2013 re U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,296”, filed Jan. 17, 2016, p. 9, Published in: US.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160230483 A1 Aug 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62114444 Feb 2015 US