The present disclosure relates to methods and apparatus for counterbalance-assisted manufacturing operations, and more specifically, to methods and apparatus for performing counterbalanced drilling operations on aircraft fuselage sections
The fabrication of large structures may involve the performance of large numbers of manufacturing operations, such as the drilling of a large number of holes in the components of the structure. Conventional structures that require a large number of drilling operations include, for example, aircraft, missiles, ships, railcars, sheet metal buildings, and other similar structures. In particular, conventional aircraft fabrication processes typically involve the drilling of a large number of holes in wing sections of the aircraft to allow these sections to be attached to each other and to the airframe with fasteners (e.g. rivets). Other types of manufacturing operations that may be involved in the construction of structures include riveting, cutting, welding, sanding, measuring and inspecting operations.
A variety of devices have been developed to facilitate drilling operations involving the drilling of a large number of holes. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,763 issued to Jack et al. discloses a drilling system that includes a pair of rails temporarily attached to an aircraft fuselage. A support carriage is slideably coupled to the rails and supports a drill assembly. A template attached to the aircraft fuselage provides an index of the desired locations of the holes that are to be formed in the aircraft fuselage. As the carriage is moved along the rails, a locking mechanism (or trigger) interacts with the template to securely position the carriage for a subsequent drilling operation.
Although desirable results have been achieved using the prior art drilling systems, some disadvantages have been noted. The drill assemblies that are conventionally used for such operations typically weigh approximately twenty pounds, and may be relatively bulky and awkward to handle. These attributes may lead to operator fatigue, and may reduce the efficiency of the fabrication process. Furthermore, the weight and bulk of the drill assembly may cause the supporting assembly of the rails and the carriage to sag, twist, or bend, depending on the orientation of the fuselage section under work, which may result in inaccuracies or misalignment of the resulting holes. For the foregoing reasons, an unmet need exists for an improved support assembly for performing manufacturing operations, including drilling operations.
The present disclosure is directed to methods and apparatus for counterbalanced manufacturing operations, and more specifically, to methods and apparatus for performing counterbalanced drilling operations on aircraft fuselage sections. Apparatus and methods in accordance with the present disclosure may advantageously reduce the amount of fatigue experienced by an operator of a manufacturing tool, and may improve the efficiency and accuracy of the manufacturing operations performed with the manufacturing tool.
In one embodiment, an assembly for performing a manufacturing operation on a workpiece includes a base, a tool support assembly, and a biasing device. The tool support assembly includes a first component coupled to the base and a second component moveable along a translation axis relative to the first component, the second component being configured to be coupled to a tool operable to perform the manufacturing operation on the workpiece. The biasing device includes a first portion coupled to the first component, a second portion coupled to the second component, and a control component. The first and second portions are moveably coupled and configured to apply a biasing force to the second component to at least partially counterbalance a force exerted on the second component along the translation axis by a weight of the tool support assembly and the tool during performance of the manufacturing operation. The control component configured to adjustably control at least one of a magnitude and a direction of the biasing force applied to the second component.
In another embodiment, an assembly for performing a manufacturing operation on a workpiece, comprises a base configured to be attached to the workpiece, a tool assembly, and a biasing device. The tool assembly includes a first component coupled to the base; a second component moveable along a translation axis relative to the first component; and a manufacturing tool operatively coupled to the second component and configured to perform the manufacturing operation on the workpiece. Similarly, the biasing device includes a first portion coupled to the first component; a second portion coupled to the second component, the first and second portions being moveably coupled to define a chamber; and a control component configured to adjustably control a flow of pressurized medium to the chamber to apply a biasing force to the second component to at least partially counterbalance a force exerted on the second component along the translation axis by a weight of the tool assembly during performance of the manufacturing operation.
In a further embodiment, a method of performing a manufacturing operation on a workpiece, comprises: moveably supporting a manufacturing tool relative to the workpiece using a tool assembly having a first component and a second component moveably coupled to the first component and to the manufacturing tool, the second component being moveable along a translation direction with respect to the first component; applying a biasing force to the second component of the tool assembly using a biasing device having a first portion coupled to the first component and a second portion coupled to the second component, the first and second portions being moveably coupled and configured to apply the biasing force to at least partially counterbalance a force applied to the second component by a weight of the manufacturing tool; controllably adjusting at least one of a magnitude and a direction of the biasing force applied to the second component; and performing the manufacturing operation on the workpiece using the manufacturing tool.
The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed above can be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present invention or may be combined in yet other embodiments further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
Embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present disclosure relates to methods and apparatus for counterbalanced manufacturing operations, and more specifically, to methods and apparatus for performing counterbalanced drilling operations on aircraft fuselage sections. Many specific details of certain embodiments of the present disclosure are set forth in the following description and in
As shown in
The carriage assembly 120 shown in
With continued reference to
As further shown in
In one particular embodiment, the support assembly 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure may be employed in drilling operations. For example,
In operation, the vacuum control valve 115 (
With the carriage assembly 120 positioned on the rail assembly 110, the carriage assembly 120 may be secured to the track assembly 110 such that the carriage assembly 120 may move back and forth along the x-axis of the track assembly 110, but will otherwise not become separated from the track assembly 110.
Next, with the supply line 138 coupled to the counterbalance control valve 140, the operator 104 may adjust a biasing pressure within the biasing cylinder 136 by actuating the counterbalance control valve 140, thereby providing a desired amount of biasing force along the y-axis. For example,
It will be appreciated that the biasing cylinder 136 may be used to counterbalance the weight of a tool assembly 160 mounted on the counterbalance assembly 130. In some embodiments, the tool assembly 160 may be mounted below the track assembly 110 such that the counterbalance assembly 130 tends to pull the tool assembly 160 toward the track assembly 110. In alternate embodiments, the tool assembly 160 may be mounted above the track assembly 110 so that the counterbalance assembly 130 tends to push the tool assembly 160 away from the track assembly 110.
A manufacturing tool may then be coupled to the counterbalance assembly 130 for performing a manufacturing process on the workpiece 102. For example,
With the drilling assembly 160 (or other manufacturing tool) secured to the counterbalance assembly 130, the operator may adjust the counterbalance control valve 140 so that the tool support 134 is biased upwardly along the y-axis (
In an alternate method of operation, the support assembly 100 may be secured to the workpiece 102, and a manufacturing tool (e.g. the drilling assembly 160) may be attached to the carriage assembly 120 of the support assembly 100. Next, the drilling assembly 160 may be securely engaged with the workpiece 102, such as, for example, by engaging the clamp collet 166 of the drill assembly 160 through a hole 107 in the workpiece 102. With the drilling assembly 160 secured to the workpiece 102, the support assembly 100 may then be disengaged from the workpiece 102 such that the support assembly 100 is supported by the drilling assembly 160 attached to the workpiece 102. The support assembly 100 may then be moved (or translated) with respect to the drilling assembly 160 to a different location on the workpiece 102, with the support assembly 100 remaining moveably coupled to the drilling assembly 160 during this portion of the process. With the support assembly 100 positioned at a new location on the workpiece 102, the support assembly 100 may be re-engaged with the workpiece 102, and the manufacturing operations with the manufacturing tool may be resumed along a new section of the workpiece 102.
In one particular embodiment, after the drilling assembly 160 (or other manufacturing tool) is secured to the workpiece 102, and with the drilling assembly 160 coupled to the counterbalance assembly 130, the counterbalance control valve 140 of the counterbalance assembly 130 may be adjusted to provide a biasing force in a direction that counterbalances the gravitational force on the support assembly 100. In this way, the counterbalance assembly 130 may be used to assist the operator 104 in the re-positioning of the support assembly 100 on the workpiece 102. In a preferred embodiment, the counterbalance assembly 130 is adjusted to approximately equal the gravitational force on the support assembly 100 so that when the support assembly 100 is disengaged from the workpiece 102 and is supported by the drilling assembly 160 secured to the workpiece 102, the support assembly 100 may be easily translated (rolled or slid) through the carriage assembly 120 similar to a carriage on a relatively-older model typewriter.
The support assembly 100 may provide significant advantages over prior art apparatus and methods for performing manufacturing operations on the workpiece 102. Because the counterbalance assembly may be adjusted to counterbalance the weight of a manufacturing tool, the operator is not required to bear the weight of the manufacturing tool while performing the manufacturing operation. The operator is therefore less likely to become fatigued during the manufacturing operation, which may improve the operator's satisfaction and comfort during performance of the manufacturing operation. Reducing the operator's fatigue may also lead to improved efficiency and improved accuracy in the performance of the manufacturing operation. Furthermore, reducing the fatigue of the operator may be especially advantageous for those manufacturing operations that require a large number of operations using the manufacturing tool on the workpiece.
The support assembly 100 may also advantageously improve the quality of the manufacturing operations by ensuring accurate, consistent positioning of the manufacturing tool with respect to the workpiece. Because the support assembly 100 supports and controls the orientation of the manufacturing tool with respect to the surface of the workpiece, the manufacturing operations may be more accurately and consistently conducted. The operator does not need to support the weight of the manufacturing tool during the manufacturing operation, but rather, may remain involved in moving the manufacturing tool to the desired location and operating the controls of the manufacturing tool to perform the desired operation. Thus, the orientation of the manufacturing tool with respect to the surface of the workpiece may be un-effected by fatigue or skill level of the operator.
Furthermore, because support assemblies in accordance with the present disclosure may be easily moved along the surface of the workpiece, the speed with which manufacturing operations may be performed may be increased. As noted above, with a manufacturing tool securely engaged with the workpiece, the support assembly 100 may be detached from the workpiece and may be moveably translated relative to the manufacturing tool to a new location on the workpiece. At the new location, the support assembly may be re-engaged with the workpiece, and the manufacturing operations may be permitted to continue. The counterbalance assembly may be used to facilitate this process by providing a biasing force that counterbalances the weight of the support assembly, thereby assisting the operator with translation of the support assembly to the new location. Thus, the apparatus and methods in accordance with the present disclosure may provide yet another improvement in the efficiency of manufacturing operations.
It may be appreciated that support assemblies in accordance with the present disclosure, including the particular embodiment of the support assembly 100 described above, may be used to provide counterbalancing support to a wide variety of manufacturing tools, and that the teachings of the present disclosure are not limited to manufacturing operations that involve drilling. For example, support assemblies in accordance with the present disclosure may be used to support riveters, mechanical and electromagnetic dent pullers, welders, wrenches, clamps, sanders, nailers, screw guns, or virtually any other desired type of manufacturing tools or measuring instruments.
It may also be appreciated that a variety of alternate embodiments of apparatus and methods may be conceived in accordance with the present disclosure, and that the disclosure is not limited to the particular apparatus and methods described above and shown in the accompanying figures. For example, it may be noted that the track assembly 110 and the carriage assembly 120 may be eliminated, and that the counterbalance assembly 130 may simply be secured directly to the workpiece 102 by one or more attachment assemblies (e.g. vacuum cup assemblies 114), to allow counterbalanced manufacturing operations at a single point on the workpiece 102, or along a single line of points on the workpiece 102 that may be parallel with the y-axis. Furthermore, the counterbalance assembly 130 may be modified or inverted with respect to the carriage assembly 120 so that the tool support 134 is positioned above the track assembly 110 rather than below the track assembly 110.
Furthermore, the carriage assembly 120 and the track assembly 110 may assume a wide variety of alternate embodiments. For example, in one embodiment, the counterbalance assembly 130 may be coupled to the rail and carriage assembly taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,763 issued to Jack et al. In yet another embodiment, the counterbalance assembly 130 may be used in combination with any of the carriage assemblies and track assemblies disclosed in co-pending, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/016,524, which application is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically,
As shown in
The widths of the rails 22, 24 extend substantially parallel to the surface of the workpiece 102 when the vacuum cup assemblies 114 are attached to the workpiece surface 102. Because the rails 22, 24 may bend relatively easily about the widthwise directions and to twist about their longitudinal axes, the rails 22, 24 may flex and twist as needed to substantially follow the surface of the workpiece 102 and the vacuum cup assemblies 114 maintain each rail at a substantially constant distance from the surface of the workpiece 102. In this manner, the major surfaces of the rails 22, 24 may be substantially perpendicular to the surface normal of the workpiece 102 at any point along each rail.
With continued reference to
The spring plates 34, 36 on which the rollers 32 are mounted may flex and twist as needed (i.e. as dictated by the contour of the workpiece surface 102 as the carriage assembly 220 traverses the rails 22, 24) to allow a limited degree of relative movement to occur between the first base member 30 and the rollers 32. This is facilitated by making the spring plates 34, 36 relatively narrow at their middles and wider at their ends, so that the plates 34, 36 preferentially bend and twist at approximately the middle rather than at the ends where the rollers 32 are mounted. Thus, a limited degree of relative movement can occur between the first base member 30 and the rails 22, 24. The net result is that the support assembly 200 enables the carriage assembly 220 to traverse the rails 22, 24 along the X-axis (i.e. the axis parallel to the length direction of the rails 22, 24) even though the rails 22, 24 may be bending and twisting in somewhat different ways relative to each other. In effect, the rails 22, 24 conform to the contour of the workpiece surface 102 and thus approximate a normal to the surface at any point along the path defined by the rails 22, 24. Consequently, a reference axis of the carriage assembly 220 (in the illustrated embodiment, an axis normal to the plane of the first base member 30) is maintained substantially normal to the workpiece surface 102 at any position of the carriage assembly 220 along the rails 22, 24.
As best shown in
To improve accuracy of the X-axis position of the carriage assembly 220, the pinion gear 44 may have a constant height relative to the rack 38 at any point along the reference rail 24. To accomplish this height control, the rotation axis of the pinion gear 44 may preferably lie in the same plane as that defined by the rotational axes of the two rollers 32 mounted on the end of the spring plate 36. More particularly, the axes of the rollers 32 may be substantially parallel to each other and substantially normal to the workpiece surface 102, and the axis of the pinion gear 44 may be substantially parallel to the workpiece surface 102 and may lie in the plane of the roller axes.
As further shown in
In operation, the counterbalance assembly 130 described above with reference to
As best shown in
As shown in
The manufacturing assembly 300 shown in
It will be appreciated that in the support assembly 100 described above with respect to
While specific embodiments of the disclosure have been illustrated and described herein, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by the disclosure of the specific embodiments set forth above. Instead, the present disclosure should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This patent application is a continuation of, commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,443 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Counterbalance-Assisted Manufacturing Operations” filed on Jun. 25, 2003, which application is incorporated herein by reference. This patent application is also related to commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/016,524 entitled “Flexible Track Drilling Machine” filed Dec. 10, 2001, and to the following, commonly-owned U.S. patent applications also filed on Jun. 25, 2003: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,472 entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Manufacturing Operations Using Opposing-Force Support Systems”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,625 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Track Members Having a Neutral-Axis Rack”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,473 entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Manufacturing Operations Using Non-Contact Position Sensing”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,402 entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Servo-Controlled Manufacturing Operations”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1630528 | Doyle | May 1927 | A |
1676206 | Ratliff | Jul 1928 | A |
1741044 | Whipple et al. | Dec 1929 | A |
2151205 | Hawn | Mar 1939 | A |
RE21795 | Verderber | May 1941 | E |
2360942 | Ellerstein | Oct 1944 | A |
2488992 | Taylor | Nov 1949 | A |
2868043 | Robbins | Jan 1959 | A |
2901946 | Grabes | Sep 1959 | A |
2911860 | Winslow et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
2922323 | Weidner | Jan 1960 | A |
2946246 | Allan | Jul 1960 | A |
2963927 | Hanger | Dec 1960 | A |
3021539 | Uhtenwoldt | Feb 1962 | A |
3156126 | Olsen | Nov 1964 | A |
3216032 | Hoffman | Nov 1965 | A |
3226027 | Cable et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3348248 | Milkert | Oct 1967 | A |
3456738 | Harry | Jul 1969 | A |
3575364 | Frederick | Apr 1971 | A |
3581623 | Galbarini | Jun 1971 | A |
3592095 | Passa et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3599958 | Schindler | Aug 1971 | A |
3627436 | Adams et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3633433 | Schurch | Jan 1972 | A |
3663115 | Vindez et al. | May 1972 | A |
3732608 | Knopf | May 1973 | A |
3772930 | Lamport et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
RE28121 | Gulley | Aug 1974 | E |
3851536 | Zeldman | Dec 1974 | A |
3874244 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3878734 | Zeldman et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3935985 | Prudhomme et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3990689 | Eklund, Sr. | Nov 1976 | A |
4025218 | Logan et al. | May 1977 | A |
4031931 | Balcombe | Jun 1977 | A |
4091712 | Geiger | May 1978 | A |
4123187 | Turner | Oct 1978 | A |
4149822 | Lehmkuhl | Apr 1979 | A |
4179231 | Hadden | Dec 1979 | A |
4268949 | Sato | May 1981 | A |
4324514 | Craven | Apr 1982 | A |
4353308 | Brown | Oct 1982 | A |
4388890 | Wester et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396318 | Jensen et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4468159 | Oster | Aug 1984 | A |
4520684 | Meyer et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4561814 | Dahlgren, Jr. et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4570542 | Cable et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4591301 | Pelfrey | May 1986 | A |
4599018 | Woods | Jul 1986 | A |
4686397 | Becker | Aug 1987 | A |
4720897 | Orrell et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4740117 | Schaff Deleury et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
D297144 | Kazlauskas | Aug 1988 | S |
4761876 | Kosmowski | Aug 1988 | A |
4778317 | Earle, III et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787786 | Freud et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4818154 | Bye et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4850763 | Jack et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4932814 | York | Jun 1990 | A |
4958967 | Adachi | Sep 1990 | A |
5032051 | Gilmore | Jul 1991 | A |
5051044 | Allen | Sep 1991 | A |
5062746 | Deremo | Nov 1991 | A |
5070792 | Harris | Dec 1991 | A |
5072948 | Kostrzewski | Dec 1991 | A |
5129865 | Brock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5173015 | Maynard | Dec 1992 | A |
5297907 | Strait et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5323962 | Jassby et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5348429 | Pfister | Sep 1994 | A |
5352069 | Rourke | Oct 1994 | A |
5383751 | Wheetley et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390557 | Tsukada | Feb 1995 | A |
5395187 | Slesinski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403133 | Kim | Apr 1995 | A |
5437580 | Doring | Aug 1995 | A |
5445478 | Ordogh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5468099 | Wheetley et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477597 | Catania et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482411 | McGlasson | Jan 1996 | A |
5486074 | Jordan | Jan 1996 | A |
5537927 | Rogovein et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542796 | Bratten et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573076 | McCannon, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582067 | Snider | Dec 1996 | A |
5609444 | Valsecchi | Mar 1997 | A |
5613810 | Bureller | Mar 1997 | A |
5661892 | Catania et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664311 | Banks et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5697413 | Fuller | Dec 1997 | A |
5713702 | Turner | Feb 1998 | A |
5934848 | Hamalainen | Aug 1999 | A |
6007278 | Arsenault | Dec 1999 | A |
6036409 | Rissler | Mar 2000 | A |
6073326 | Banks et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099213 | Kammeraad et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6210084 | Banks et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220099 | Marti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240332 | Buttrick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283684 | Jarvis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309145 | Tremblay et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334745 | Bennett, Sr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357101 | Sarh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378197 | Hansen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382889 | Brown et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413022 | Sarh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428452 | Dahlstrom et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428453 | Hoppe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430796 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439813 | Repossini | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467385 | Buttrick et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494307 | Kozak et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505393 | Stoewer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6547496 | Chun et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550129 | Buttrick, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575673 | Born | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6612792 | Barclay | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634838 | Kitamura et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6796014 | Sarh | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6843328 | Boyl-Davis et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855099 | Hazlehurst et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6902362 | Ferrari et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916141 | Owen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926094 | Arntson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7273333 | Buttrick et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20020001511 | Reguzzi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020127069 | Luigi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020159853 | Barclay | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168241 | David et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030047332 | Merrick | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030207742 | Hazlehurst et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040076484 | Alam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040234352 | Vanderpol et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245879 | Hirzel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050158134 | Roders | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
383281 | Nov 1931 | BE |
562676 | Jun 1960 | BE |
9001062 | Apr 1990 | DE |
19834702 | Feb 2000 | DE |
0917920 | May 1990 | EP |
1132164 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2285972 | May 1976 | FR |
55120910 | Sep 1980 | JP |
58028442 | Feb 1983 | JP |
401064711 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01210207 | Aug 1989 | JP |
05318218 | Dec 1993 | JP |
WO03049899 | Jun 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080019784 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10606443 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11782615 | US |