This disclosure relates generally to mixtures and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for determining a viscosity of oil in a mixture.
Formation fluid flowing from a subterranean formation into a downhole tool is often a mixture of oil and water. Generally, the mixture is unstable and, therefore, the oil and the water separate over time if the mixture is static. Generally, to determine a viscosity of the oil in the formation fluid, a sample of the formation fluid is stored in a container until the oil separates from the water, or a chemical demulsifier may be added to the mixture to cause the oil and the water to separate. The oil may then be removed from the container, and a viscosity of the oil may be determined.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
An example method disclosed herein includes determining water fractions of a mixture flowing into a downhole tool and determining viscosities of the mixture. The mixture includes water and oil. The example method also includes determining a viscosity of the oil based on the water fractions and the viscosities.
Another example method disclosed herein includes determining a viscosity of a flowing mixture as a function of a fraction of a dispersed phase of the mixture and extrapolating the fraction of the dispersed phase to zero.
Embodiments of methods and apparatus for determining a viscosity of oil in a mixture are described with reference to the following figures. The same numbers are used throughout the figures to reference like features and components.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and within which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments by which the examples described herein may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
One or more aspects of the present disclosure relate to determining a viscosity of oil in a mixture. In some examples, apparatus and methods disclosed herein are implemented in a downhole tool and/or wireline-conveyed tools such as a Modular Formation Dynamics Tester (MDT) of Schlumberger Ltd.
Example methods disclosed herein may include determining water fractions of a mixture flowing into a downhole tool and determining viscosities of the mixture. The mixture may include water and oil. In some examples, formation fluid in a subterranean formation may be a mixture including oil and water (i.e., a suspension and/or dispersion of water in oil or oil in water). As the formation fluid flows into the downhole or wireline-conveyed tool, water fractions of the formation fluid may decrease monotonically. The water fractions of the mixture may be determined by determining optical densities of the mixture. The viscosities of the mixture may be determined by increasing a stability or emulsification of the mixture (e.g., by agitating the mixture) and using a vibrating wire viscometer. The example methods may also include determining a viscosity of the oil based on the water fractions and the viscosities. The viscosity of the oil may be determined by determining a viscosity of the mixture as a function of the water fraction of the mixture and extrapolating the water fraction of the mixture to zero.
A drill string 12 is suspended within the borehole 11 and has a bottom hole assembly 100 which includes a drill bit 105 at its lower end. The surface system includes platform and derrick assembly 10 positioned over the borehole 11. The assembly 10 includes a rotary table 16, kelly 17, hook 18 and rotary swivel 19. The drill string 12 is rotated by the rotary table 16, energized by means not shown, which engages the kelly 17 at the upper end of the drill string 12. The drill string 12 is suspended from the hook 18, attached to a traveling block (also not shown), through the kelly 17 and the rotary swivel 19, which permits rotation of the drill string 12 relative to the hook 18. As is well known, a top drive system could alternatively be used.
In the example of this embodiment, the surface system further includes drilling fluid or mud 26 stored in a pit 27 formed at the well site. A pump 29 delivers the drilling fluid 26 to the interior of the drill string 12 via a port in the swivel 19, causing the drilling fluid 26 to flow downwardly through the drill string 12 as indicated by the directional arrow 8. The drilling fluid 26 exits the drill string 12 via ports in the drill bit 105, and then circulates upwardly through the annulus region between the outside of the drill string and the wall of the borehole, as indicated by the directional arrows 9. In this well known manner, the drilling fluid 26 lubricates the drill bit 105 and carries formation cuttings up to the surface as it is returned to the pit 27 for recirculation.
The bottom hole assembly 100 of the illustrated embodiment includes a logging-while-drilling (LWD) module 120, a measuring-while-drilling (MWD) module 130, a roto-steerable system and motor 150, and drill bit 105.
The LWD module 120 is housed in a special type of drill collar, as is known in the art, and can contain one or a plurality of known types of logging tools. It will also be understood that more than one LWD and/or MWD module can be employed, e.g. as represented at 120A. (References, throughout, to a module at the position of 120 can alternatively mean a module at the position of 120A as well.) The LWD module 120 includes capabilities for measuring, processing, and storing information, as well as for communicating with the surface equipment. In the present embodiment, the LWD module 120 includes a fluid sampling device.
The MWD module 130 is also housed in a special type of drill collar, as is known in the art, and can contain one or more devices for measuring characteristics of the drill string 12 and drill bit 105. The MWD tool further includes an apparatus (not shown) for generating electrical power to the downhole system. This may include a mud turbine generator powered by the flow of the drilling fluid, it being understood that other power and/or battery systems may be employed. In the present embodiment, the MWD module 130 includes one or more of the following types of measuring devices: a weight-on-bit measuring device, a torque measuring device, a vibration measuring device, a shock measuring device, a stick slip measuring device, a direction measuring device, and an inclination measuring device.
Referring to
The extendable probe assembly 316 may be configured to selectively seal off or isolate selected portions of the wall of the wellbore 302 to fluidly couple to an adjacent formation F and/or to draw fluid samples from the formation F. Accordingly, the extendable probe assembly 316 may be provided with a probe having an embedded plate, as described above. The formation fluid may be expelled through a port (not shown) or it may be sent to one or more fluid collecting chambers 326 and 328. In the illustrated example, the electronics and processing system 306 and/or a downhole control system are configured to control the extendable probe assembly 316 and/or the drawing of a fluid sample from the formation F.
The first fluid analyzer module 404 and/or the second fluid analyzer module 408 include one or more optical tools 412 and 414 (e.g., a In Situ Fluid Analyzer (IFA) of Schlumberger Ltd., a Live Fluid Analyzer (LFA) of Schlumberger Ltd., a Composition Fluid Analyzer (CFA) of Schlumberger Ltd., and/or any other suitable optical tool) disposed along the flowline 402 to determine a variety of characteristics (e.g., hydrocarbon composition, gas/oil ratio, live-oil density, pH of water, fluid color, etc.) and/or fluid concentrations (e.g., concentrations of methane, ethane-propane-butane-pentane, water, carbon dioxide, and/or other fluids) of the formation fluid flowing through the flowline 402. In some examples, the optical tools 412 and 414 are disposed along the flowline 402 upstream and/or downstream of the fluid agitator 410. In the illustrated example, the optical tools 412 and 414 are disposed upstream and downstream of the fluid agitator 410 along the flowline 402. The optical tools 412 and 414 include one or more sensors (not shown) to determine water fractions of the formation fluid by determining optical densities of the formation fluid.
The second fluid analyzer module 408 also includes at least one viscometer 416 such as, for example, a vibrating wire viscometer, a vibrating rod viscometer, and/or any other suitable viscometer. The viscometer 416 is disposed along the flowline 402 downstream of the fluid agitator 410 and the optical tools 412 and 414 to determine viscosities of the formation fluid.
During operation, the formation fluid flows from the subterranean formation into the downhole tool 400. The formation fluid is a mixture including oil and water (i.e., a suspension and/or dispersion of oil in water or water in oil). In some examples, water-based drilling fluid or oil-based drilling fluid is colloidally suspended and/or dispersed in the formation fluid flowing into the downhole tool 400. The formation fluid flows into the flowline 402 and through the first fluid analyzer module 404, the MRPO 406, and the second fluid analyzer module 408. As the formation fluid flows through the flowline 402, the first optical tool 412 and/or the second optical tool 414 determine water fractions of the formation fluid by determining optical densities of the formation fluid.
After the formation fluid flows through the first fluid analyzer module 404, the formation fluid flows through the fluid agitator 410 disposed in the MRPO 406. The formation fluid is agitated (i.e., sheared) via the fluid agitator 410 to cause droplets of the water (i.e., the dispersed phase) in the formation fluid to decrease in size. In some examples, the fluid agitator 410 is to cause the water droplets to disperse substantially uniformly throughout a continuous phase (e.g., oil) of the formation fluid. As a result, a stability and/or an emulsification of the formation fluid is increased (i.e., the mixture tightens and/or emulsifies). After the formation fluid is agitated via the fluid agitator 410, the viscometer 416 determines viscosities of the formation fluid. In some examples, the viscosities of the formation fluid are determined based on a shear rate of the viscometer 416. As described in greater detail below, based on the viscosities and the water fractions, the viscosity of only the oil in the formation fluid is determined.
Viscositymixture=A+B(Water Fraction)+C(Water Fraction)2. Equation (1)
In Equation 1, A is the viscosity of the oil in units of centipoise (cP) and B and C are constants in units of centipoise (cP). The water fraction is unitless. The viscosity of the oil in the formation fluid is determined by extrapolating the water fraction of the formation fluid to zero. For example, using values from the curve 700 of
Alternatively, some or all of the example process of
Further, although the example process of
At block 806, the stability or emulsification of the mixture is increased. For example, the mixture is agitated via the fluid agitator 410 to decrease sizes of droplets of the dispersed phase of the mixture and/or substantially uniformly disperse the droplets throughout the continuous phase. The fractions of the dispersed phase of the mixture are determined before and/or after the stability of the mixture is increased. At block 808, viscosities of the mixture are determined. For example, the viscometer 416 (e.g., a vibrating wire viscometer, a vibrating rod viscometer, etc.) determines the viscosities of the mixture. The viscosities are determined when the fractions of the dispersed phase of the mixture are decreasing monotonically.
At block 810, a viscosity of the mixture as a function of the fraction of the dispersed phase of the mixture is determined. For example, the viscosity of the mixture as a function of the fraction of the dispersed phase may be determined by using the viscosities and the fractions of the dispersed phase determined when the water fractions are decreasing monotically. At block 812, the water fraction of the dispersed phase of the mixture is extrapolated to zero. For example, the water fraction of the dispersed phase may be extrapolated to zero using a second order polynomial equation representing the viscosity of the mixture as a function of the fraction of the dispersed phase such as, for example, Equation 1. Thus, at block 814, a viscosity of the continuous phase (i.e., the oil) of the mixture is determined.
Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the example embodiments without materially departing from this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may not be structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together, whereas a screw employs a helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a screw may be equivalent structures. It is the express intention of the applicant not to invoke 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those in which the claim expressly uses the words ‘means for’ together with an associated function.
The Abstract at the end of this disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b) to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5070725 | Cox et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5095758 | Cox et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5331156 | Hines et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5680899 | Waid et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5939717 | Mullins | Aug 1999 | A |
6474152 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6688176 | Storm et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6912904 | Storm et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7114562 | Fisseler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134500 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7707897 | Ong | May 2010 | B2 |
8329965 | Matthews et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20090000390 | Duhanyan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110061439 | Dong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110136700 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120168153 | Joseph et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209541 | Ong et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
A.I. Memon, J. Gao, S.D. Tylor, T.L. Davies, N. Jia, “A Systematic Workflow Process for Heavy Oil Characterization: Experimental Techniques and Challenges”, CSUG/SPE 137006, pp. 1-18. |
M.-J. Tsang Mui Ching, Andrew E. Pomerantz, A. Ballard Andrews, Philip Dryden, Robert Schroeder, Oliver C. Mullins, and Christopher Harrison, “On the Nanofiltration of Asphaltene Solutions, Crude Oils, and Emulsions,” Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 5028-5037: DOI:10.1021/ef100645b, 2010 American Chemical Society, pp. 5028-5037. |
S.L. Kokal, “Crude Oil Emulsions,” Petroleum Engineering Handbook, vol. I, Chap. 12, pp. 533-570. |
Sunil Kokal, “SPE Distinguished Lecturer Series—Crude Oil Emulsions: Everything You Wanted to Know But Were Afraid to Ask,” SPE Foundation, pp. 1-38. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130255368 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |