This patent relates generally to audience measurement and, more particularly, to determining the operating state of audio-video devices.
Media ratings and metering information is typically generated by collecting viewing records or other media consumption information from a group of statistically selected households. Each of the statistically selected households typically has a data logging and processing unit commonly referred to as a “home unit.” In households having multiple viewing sites (e.g., multiple television systems or, more generally, multiple media presentation devices), the data logging and processing functionality may be distributed among a single home unit and multiple site units, where one site unit may be provided for each viewing site, location or area. The home unit (or the combination of the home unit and the site units) is often in communication with a variety of attachments that provide inputs to the home unit or receive outputs from the site unit to gather data from the audio-video (AV) devices at the selected site.
Available AV devices are becoming more complex in functionality and interoperability with other AV devices. As a result, manufacturers are exploring new, user-friendly ways of standardizing interfaces to simplify for the user the set-up and operation of these devices. For example, High-Definition Multimedia Interface-Consumer Electronic Control (HDMI-CEC) simplifies the setup and operation of an otherwise complex arrangement of AV network devices
An AV network configured in this manner is typically monitored using hardware, firmware, and/or software to interface with the AV devices to extract or to generate signal information that may be used to determine viewing habits. Many AV networks are also configured so that the AV devices coupled to the network may be powered independently. As a result, a set top box, for example, may be powered on while a television associated with the set top box is off. Thus, monitoring AV networks having independently powered devices typically involves an additional device or method to determine the operating state of the television set to ensure that the collected data reflects media information actually viewed or consumed.
In addition, building security and building monitoring systems, which may use a variety of AV devices, are becoming more prevalent. Such systems enable a building owner to determine the state of various electronic appliances in the building, even when the building owner is located remotely from the building premises. In many instances, the building owner may desire to know the operating state, e.g., on state or off state, of a particular appliance such as a television or other media delivery/presentation device. In another setting, parents often have an interest in monitoring their children's television viewing habits, electronic gaming habits, and computer usage habits. A component of monitoring such habits involves determining the on or off state of the appliance, electronic device, etc. of interest.
Certain examples are shown in the above-identified figures and described in detail below. In describing these examples, like or identical reference numbers may be used to identify common or similar elements. Although the example systems described herein include, among other components, software executed on hardware, such apparatus is merely illustrative and should not be considered as limiting. Any or all of the disclosed components could be embodied exclusively in hardware, exclusively in software, exclusively in firmware or in some combination of hardware, firmware or software.
For media ratings to have value to advertisers or producers of media content, metering data used to generate the ratings must provide an accurate representation of the viewing habits of persons in metered environments (e.g., households). Generating accurate metering data has become more difficult as the audio-visual (AV) devices presenting media content in metered households have become more complex in functionality and interoperability. To reduce the complexity of connecting and operating the AV devices, AV device manufacturers have developed AV network protocols (e.g., HDMI-CEC) for transmitting digital messages between AV devices.
Messages transmitted via an AV network convey information between devices related to the operating states of the devices (e.g., power status, tuning status, record and playback information and remote control information). The message data transmitted via an AV network may be utilized (e.g., extracted and analyzed) to identify the operating states of AV devices that are coupled to the AV network and which are presenting media content to people in metered households or other monitored environments. Proper identification of the operating states of AV devices is crucial in ensuring that the metering data collected accurately reflects consumption of media content by persons and, as a result, ensuring that the data may be used to produce media ratings with value to advertisers or producers of media content.
The example methods and apparatus described herein may be used to identify operating states (e.g., on/off power status) of AV devices (e.g., televisions, set top boxes, digital video disc recorders, etc.) connected to or otherwise communicatively coupled to an AV network. The AV devices on an AV network may power up independently, may include multiple functionalities within one device (e.g., a tuner, digital video recording and/or playback, etc.) and may have multiple audio and video source inputs or outputs. Multiple media presentation devices of a particular type (e.g., televisions) may also exist on the AV network.
In general, the example methods and apparatus described herein identify the operating states of AV devices on an AV network by identifying the on or off status of the AV devices, the audio and video sources supplying the media content to a media presentation device and/or viewing modes (e.g., play, fast forward, reverse, pause, etc.) of each of the AV devices. Additionally, the example methods and apparatus may identify the operating state of an AV device by analyzing the operating state of a plurality of AV devices on the AV network. For example, if multiple AV devices on an AV network are identified to be in an operating state associated with supplying media content to a person, the operating states of each AV device may be further analyzed to determine which of the AV devices are in an operating state indicating that the AV device is actually or actively supplying media content to the person viewing the media presentation device.
More specifically, the example methods and apparatus described herein identify the operating state of an AV device by monitoring and analyzing messages transmitted on a bus (e.g., an Inter-Integrated Circuit bus) communicatively coupled between a processor and an AV network controller within a first AV device. An example method and apparatus described in more detail below monitors a bus, extracts messages associated with an operation of a second AV device, analyzes the extracted messages to determine whether further information is needed to identify the operating state of the second AV device, and requests missing information from the second AV device. The example method and apparatus may then identify the operating state of the second AV device by analyzing the extracted messages along with the information requested from the second AV device.
In one example implementation, a message monitor is implemented within a first AV device (e.g., a set top box) and configured to monitor messages associated with the operation of a second AV device (e.g., a digital video disc recorder (DVDR)). The message monitor monitors messages transmitted on a bus between a processor and a network controller within the first AV device. An extractor then extracts messages associated with the operation of the second AV device such as, for example, a power-on command sent to a DVDR or various playback operations (e.g., play or fast forward) associated with the DVDR. An analyzer analyzes the extracted messages to identify missing information that may be needed to identify the operating state of the second AV device and commands a requester to send a message to the second AV device requesting the missing information. Once the requested missing information is extracted from the bus, an identifier identifies the operating state of the second AV device. This example implementation may be used to identify the operating state of every AV device located on the AV network. Alternatively or additionally, the example implementation may identify the operating state of the second AV device by analyzing the operating states of a plurality of AV devices connected to the AV network.
Before discussing the example methods and apparatus for determining the operating state of audio-video devices in detail, a brief discussion of the manners in which AV devices are connected to and communicate via an AV network is first provided below. Available AV devices, such as those depicted in
To enable an AV network to provide features such as one-button-play functionality and other high level control functions, each AV device connected to the AV network must be able to address directly all other AV devices on the AV network. To accomplish this, each AV device on the network is assigned a physical address and a logical address. For example, when an AV device is added to the AV network, the AV device is assigned a physical address corresponding to its physical location on the AV network and a logical address corresponding to the functionality of the device. If an AV device connected to the AV network does not fully support the protocol utilized in the AV network, the AV device may be assigned a physical address but not a logical address. Multiple methods of addressing could be used and one such example is set forth in the High-Definition Multimedia Interface specification, version 1.3 provided through HDMI Licensing, LLC, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
An HDMI-CEC network is created through the interconnection of two or more HDMI-CEC compliant devices. Physical addresses are assigned to an AV device on the HDMI-CEC network according to the location at which the AV device is connected to the AV network and are used to ensure that media content is routed correctly from a source AV device (e.g., a DVDR) to a media presentation device (e.g., a television). The root device of the AV network (e.g., a television) is always assigned the physical address 0.0.0.0. A first AV device on the AV network may have one or more ports available for connecting a second AV device to the AV network. The physical address of the second AV device is created by incorporating the physical address of the first AV device and the number of the port of the first AV device to which the second AV device is connected. For example, a second AV device may be connected to port 2 of a first AV device having the physical address of 1.2.0.0 and, therefore, the second AV device may be assigned the physical address of 1.2.2.0.
Another method of addressing AV devices on an AV network uses logical addressing based on the functionality (e.g., television, tuner, recording device, playback device or audio system) of the AV device. An AV device may incorporate one or more functionalities such as, for example, a STB may have two tuners and two digital recording devices implemented internally. Each functionality type (e.g., recording device or tuner) implemented within a device is assigned a logical address. However, if an AV device contains multiple instances associated with a functionality, the AV device may only be assigned one logical address of that functionality, and the AV device may be required to manage the multiple instances of functionality internally. In the above-mentioned STB example, the STB may be assigned a physical address of 1.2.0.0, a logical address for a tuner and another logical address for a recording device. The STB may then manage second instances of a tuner and a recording device internally.
HDMI-CEC is an AV device network communication protocol designed to be implemented using a single wire, multi-drop bus for which all messages transferred via the AV network (i.e., via the single wire bus) are received substantially simultaneously by all AV devices on the AV network. The messages transmitted via the AV network contain fields that indicate the message source (e.g., the logical address of the AV device sending the message), the message destination (e.g., the logical address of the AV device intended as the recipient of the message) and an operation code (e.g., a command to the destination device or request for status information). Some messages (e.g., broadcast messages) contain a message destination that indicates that all AV devices on the AV network are the intended recipients of the messages. The AV devices indicated as the message destination process the operation code sent in the message and reply to the AV device indicated as the message source.
In the example implementation illustrated in
The STB 106 may also send and receive commands and/or other information via the AV network 100 with an AV network controller 210. The AV network controller 210 is capable of exchanging commands and/or other information with other AV network devices (e.g., the television 104, the DVDR 108, etc.) via the AV network 100 using communications compliant with any desired protocol such as, for example, HDMI-CEC. The AV network controller 210 may be implemented within in a single integrated circuit, with multiple integrated circuits or combined within an integrated circuit with other functionality. The processor 208 and the AV network controller 210 communicate via a bus 212, which may be implemented as an Inter-Integrated Circuit (I2C) bus or any other bus capable of transmitting data between integrated circuits. Commands received by the remote control receiver 204 and/or the manual user interface 202 may be processed by the processor 208 and transferred via the bus 212 or via an additional data bus such as the data bus 206. Although the data busses 206 and 212 are depicted as separate busses, the functionality of these busses may be implemented using a single bus. The example system 200 also includes a bus monitor 214 implemented within the processor 208 and is designed to extract messages conveyed between networked AV devices via the bus 212.
In the illustrated example, the operating state identifier system 200 implemented within the STB 106 is configured to identify the operating state of any AV device communicatively coupled to the AV network 100. The operating state identifier system 200 identifies the operating state of an AV device by monitoring messages transmitted via the bus 212, extracting messages transmitted via the bus 212 between the processor 208 and the AV network controller 210, analyzing the extracted messages and requesting any missing information associated with the operating state of the AV device. The operating state identifier system 200 may identify the operating state of an AV device on the AV network 100 by analyzing the extracted messages along with any missing information returned by the AV device.
To examine the illustrated example in more detail, the operating state identifier system 200 may be used to identify the operating state of an AV device (e.g., the DVDR 108) on the AV network 100 that is actively providing media content to a media presentation device (e.g., the television 104) consumed (e.g., viewed and/or listened to) by a person. Further, the operating state identifier system 200, as illustrated, is implemented within the processor 208 of the STB 106, but could be implemented within a processor within any device communicatively coupled to the AV network 100.
A person (e.g., the person 102) may interact with the STB 106 via the user interface 202 (e.g., by operating buttons, keys, switches or knobs) or via a remote control device 114 via the remote control receiver 204, or a combination of these interfaces. The remote control device 114 (
All AV devices connected to the AV network 100 receive commands and/or messages conveyed via the AV network 100, but only an AV device (e.g., the DVDR 108) indicated as the message destination device processes the message and responds to the source AV device (e.g., the STB 106).
The bus monitor 214, in this example implemented within the processor 208, monitors communications (e.g., messages) conveyed on the bus 212 and extracts information associated with the commands and/or messages conveyed between the AV network controller 210 and the processor 208. The commands and/or messages may be associated with the operation of any device communicatively coupled to the AV network 100, including the STB 106.
Further, the bus monitor 214 analyzes the extracted messages and may request missing information that may be used to identify the operating state of an AV device. The missing information may include, but is not limited to, commands provided to the AV device through the user interface 202 or messages transmitted through a remote control directly to the AV device and not conveyed via the AV network 100. For example, the person 102 (
As noted above,
The messages transmitted via the AV network 100 contain fields that indicate the message source (e.g., the logical address of the AV device sending the message), the message destination (e.g., the logical address of the AV device intended as the recipient of the message) and an operation code (e.g., a command to the destination device or a request for status information). Additionally, the operation code field may contain additional, optional data for describing the operation code. In the example events of
Turning in more detail to the events in
The bus monitor 214 may use Events A-D of
Finally, the bus monitor 214 may further identify another operating state of the DVDR 108 as messages extracted indicate that the user has finished viewing the media content (events J-L). The messages extracted indicate that the disc tray was opened (event J) and closed without media installed (event K) and that the DVDR 108 was transitioned from an on state to a standby state (event L), which the bus monitor 214 may use to identify the operating state of the DVDR 108 as standby without media installed.
The example apparatus 400 includes the message monitor 402 to monitor the communications or messages between the AV network controller 210 (
The requester 408 requests the missing information identified by the analyzer 406 from the targeted AV device. The identifier 410 is configured to identify an operating state of the targeted AV device by analyzing the extracted messages and the responses from the AV device providing the missing information requested by the requester 408. The memory 412 is also in communication with the example apparatus 400. The memory 412 may be a non-volatile memory (e.g., flash memory), a mass storage device (e.g., a disk drive), a volatile memory (e.g., static or dynamic random access memory) or any combination of the enumerated memory types.
Some or all of the message monitor 402, the extractor 404, the analyzer 406, the requester 408, the identifier 410 or parts thereof, may be implemented using instructions, code, and/or other software and/or firmware, etc. stored on a machine accessible medium that are executed by, for example, a processor (e.g., the processor 800 of
The example apparatus 400 may be implemented in the processor 208 (
Initially, the message monitor 402 monitors communications on a data bus (e.g., the bus 212) communicatively coupling a processor (e.g., the processor 208) and an AV network controller (e.g., the AV network controller 210) for communications between AV devices (e.g., the television 104, the DVDR 108, the STB 106, etc.) on an AV network, such as the AV network 100 of
The analyzer 406 analyzes the extracted messages to determine whether additional information may be needed to determine the operating state of the second AV device (block 514). If the analyzer 406 determines more information is needed, then the requester 408 conveys the request via the AV network controller 210 via the bus 212, which, in turn, conveys the request to the second AV device via the AV network 100 (block 516). The message monitor 402 and the extractor 404 continue to monitor the communications on the bus 212 and extract messages associated with the operation of the second AV device (blocks 502-512).
The analyzer 406 may determine that information associated with the operating state of the second AV device is missing through direct analysis of the messages extracted by the extractor 404. For example, the analyzer 406 may examine the temporal sequence of the extracted messages, identify periods where messages may have been expected but none were extracted, and determine that information associated with commands that may have been entered via another user interface (e.g., the user interface 202 of
Once the analyzer 406 determines that no further information is needed to identify the operating state of the second AV device (block 514), the identifier 410 identifies the operating state of the second AV device by examining the extracted messages and the responses to the requests for missing information and stores the operating state data in the memory 412 (block 518). For example, the identifier 410 may analyze the messages shown in the events B-I of
As mentioned above, the generation of media ratings with value to advertisers is an important goal for gathering accurate metering data at a metered household (e.g., the home of the person(s) represented by the person 102 of
If each AV device in the device column 600 of
Another possible scenario is illustrated in
In
Initially, the method 700 identifies all AV devices connected to the AV network 100 (block 702). The identification of the AV devices on the AV network 100 may be included in another process such as the example method 500 of
Once an identifier (e.g., the identifier 410 of
The processor 802 is in communication with the main memory (including a RAM 808 and/or a ROM 810) via a bus 812. The RAM 808 may be implemented by dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random-access memory (SDRAM), and/or any other type of RAM device, and the ROM 810 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. A memory controller 814 may control access to the memory 808 and the memory 810.
The processor platform 802 also includes an interface circuit 816. The interface circuit 816 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an the AV network controller 210, external memory interface, serial port, general purpose input/output, etc. One or more input devices 818 and one or more output devices 820 are connected to the interface circuit 816.
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4230990 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4658290 | McKenna et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4885632 | Mabey et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4905080 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907079 | Turner et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4943963 | Waechter et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5034902 | Steinmann | Jul 1991 | A |
5251324 | McMullan, Jr. | Oct 1993 | A |
5319453 | Copriviza et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5374951 | Welsh | Dec 1994 | A |
5448554 | Van Steenbrugge | Sep 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488408 | Maduzia et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5581800 | Fardeau et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5608445 | Mischler | Mar 1997 | A |
5629739 | Dougherty | May 1997 | A |
5630203 | Weinblatt | May 1997 | A |
5631995 | Weissensteiner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5787334 | Fardeau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5844636 | Joseph et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6202210 | Ludtke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6389403 | Dorak, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400996 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405370 | Jarrell | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6460018 | Kasai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496862 | Akatsu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6675383 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700893 | Radha et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704929 | Ozer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6779198 | Morinaga et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792469 | Callahan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6983478 | Grauch et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7359528 | Rhoads | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7404016 | Emerson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7690017 | Stecyk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7827319 | Kimura et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8526626 | Nielsen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8763022 | Ramaswamy | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20010007149 | Smith | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020010919 | Lu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020059577 | Lu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073419 | Yen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078441 | Drake et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129368 | Schlack et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020173911 | Brunet et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194592 | Tsuchida et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005432 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023967 | Kim | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030041141 | Abdelaziz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040116067 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040254887 | Jacoby | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066210 | Chen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086334 | Aaltonen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050278731 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289613 | Lawrence | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060075420 | Ludvig et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075421 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070053513 | Hoffberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070186229 | Conklin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080025707 | Sawada et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056675 | Wright et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082661 | Huber | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098426 | Candelore | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120440 | Balasubramanian et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148307 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080244680 | Mochizuki | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263579 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090178087 | Menn et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241148 | Lo | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20140250449 | Ramaswamy | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3742426 | Jun 1989 | DE |
0843468 | May 1998 | EP |
1100265 | May 2001 | EP |
1318676 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1586045 | Oct 2005 | EP |
2738977 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2745144 | Aug 1997 | FR |
2265736 | Oct 1993 | GB |
2406451 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2003323362 | Nov 2003 | JP |
9217027 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9417609 | Aug 1994 | WO |
9806193 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9831114 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0161892 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0165747 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2004051997 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005079457 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005079941 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005125198 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006012629 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006014495 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006020560 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006014495 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006037631 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006055897 | May 2006 | WO |
2007048124 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US1992/002211, mailed Jul. 20, 1992 (1 page). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US1998/000091, mailed Apr. 28, 1998 (2 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2001/005104, mailed Sep. 28, 2001 (3 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2002/038012, mailed May 22, 2003 (2 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2005/005079, mailed Jun. 17, 2005 (2 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2005/023995, mailed Dec. 23, 2005 (1 page). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/EP2005/010739, mailed Apr. 26, 2006 (4 pages). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2005/042108, mailed Aug. 17, 2006 (1 page). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2005/026426, mailed Aug. 18, 2006 (1 page). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2005/028106, mailed Mar. 12, 2007 (1 page). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2006/060118, mailed Mar. 14, 2008 (1 page). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report,” issued by the International Searching Authority in connection with counterpart PCT application No. PCT/US2005/005064, mailed Sep. 25, 2008 (1 page). |
Svenska Elektriska Kommissionen, SEK, English language translation of “Domestic and Similar Electronic Equipment Interconnection Requirements: AV.Link,” Serial No. SS-EN 50157-1, Jul. 1998 (20 pages). |
Svenska Elektriska Kommissionen, SEK, English language translation of “Domestic and Similar Electronic Equipment Interconnection Requirements: AV.Link,” Serial No. SS-EN 50 157-2-1, Apr. 1996 (33 pages). |
Svenska Elektriska Kommissionen, SEK, English language translation of “Domestic and Similar Electronic Equipment Interconnection Requirements: AV.Link,” Serial No. SS-EN 50157-2-2, Aug. 1998 (18 page). |
Svenska Elektriska Kommissionen, SEK, English language translation of “Domestic and Similar Electronic Equipment Interconnection Requirements: AV.Link,” Serial No. SS-EN 50157-2-3, Aug. 1998 (12 pages). |
Friess, Steve, “Nielsen, TiVo Try Ratings Game,” www.wired.com, Sep. 13, 2002 (2 pages). |
NXP Semiconductors, Product Data Sheet of “TDA 9950 CEC/PC-bus Translator,” released on Nov. 16, 2007 (24 pages). |
BPR, Ltd., “The Scart Connector,” 2003 (6 pages). |
Boccaccio, Jeff, “Inside HDMI CEC: The Little-Known Control Feature,” Dec. 28, 2007 (7 pages). |
Jones et al., “CEC-Enabled HDMI System Design for Multi-Vendor Compatibility,” www.videsignline.com, Jun. 20, 2008 (9 pages). |
Gardiner et al., “Digital Television Project Provision of Technical Assistance, Preliminary Investigation of a SCART Lead Benchmarking Scheme,” DTG Management Services, Ltd., Feb. 7, 2005 (27 pages). |
Belinfante et al., “Specification Based Formal Testing: The EasyLink Case Study,” University of Twente, Enschede, N.L., and Philips Research, Eindhoven, N.L., published in 2001 (10 pages). |
“Designing EC into Your Next HDMI Product,” www.quantumdata.com (11 pages). |
Hitachi, Ltd. et al., “High-Definition Multimedia Interface, Specification Version 1.3a,” Nov. 10, 2006 (276 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100079597 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |