1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for separating and joining tubulars in a wellbore; more particularly, the present invention relates to cutting a tubular in a wellbore using rotational and radial forces brought to bear against a wall of the tubular.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the completion and operation of hydrocarbon wells, it is often necessary to separate one piece of a downhole tubular from another piece in a wellbore. In most instances, bringing the tubular back to surface for a cutting operation is impossible and in all instances it is much more efficient in time and money to separate the pieces in the wellbore. The need to separate tubulars in a wellbore arises in different ways. For example, during drilling and completion of an oil well, tubulars and downhole tools mounted thereon are routinely inserted and removed from the wellbore. In some instances, tools or tubular strings become stuck in the wellbore leading to a “fishing” operation to locate and remove the stuck portion of the apparatus. In these instances, it is often necessary to cut the tubular in the wellbore to remove the run-in string and subsequently remove the tool itself by milling or other means. In another example, a downhole tool such as a packer is run into a wellbore on a run-in string of tubular. The packing member includes a section of tubular or a “tail pipe” hanging from the bottom thereof and it is advantageous to remove this section of tail pipe in the wellbore after the packer has been actuated. In instances where workover is necessary for a well which has slowed or ceased production, downhole tubulars routinely must be removed in order to replace them with new or different tubulars or devices. For example, un-cemented well casing may be removed from a well in order to reuse the casing or to get it out of the way in a producing well.
In yet another example, plug and abandonment methods require tubulars to be cut in a wellbore such as a subsea wellbore in order to seal the well and conform with rules and regulations associated with operation of an oil well offshore. Because the interior of a tubular typically provides a pathway clear of obstructions, and because any annular space around a tubular is limited, prior art devices for downhole tubular cutting typically operate within the interior of the tubular and cut the wall of the tubular from the inside towards the outside.
A prior art example of an apparatus designed to cut a tubular in this fashion includes a cutter run into the interior of a tubular on a run-in string. As the tool reaches a predetermined area of the wellbore where the tubular will be separated, cutting members in the cutting tool are actuated hydraulically and swing outwards from a pivot point on the body of the tool. When the cutting members are actuated, the run-in string with the tool therebelow is rotated and the tubular therearound is cut by the rotation of the cutting members. The foregoing apparatus has some disadvantages. For instance, the knives are constructed to swing outward from a pivot point on the body of the cutting tool and in certain instances, the knives can become jammed between the cutting tool and the interior of the tubular to be cut. In other instances, the cutting members can become jammed in a manner which prevents them from retracting once the cutting operation is complete. In still other examples, the swinging cutting members can become jammed with the lower portion of tubular after it has been separated from the upper portion thereof. Additionally, this type of cutter creates cuttings that are difficult to remove and subsequently causes problems for other downhole tools.
An additional problem associated conventional downhole cutting tools includes the cost and time associated with transporting a run-in string of tubular to a well where a downhole tubular is to be cut. Run-in strings for the cutting tools are expensive, must be long enough to reach that section of downhole tubular to be cut, and require some type of rig in order to transport, bear the weight of, and rotate the cutting tool in the wellbore. Because the oil wells requiring these services are often remotely located, transporting this quantity of equipment to a remote location is expensive and time consuming. While coil tubing has been utilized as a run-in string for downhole cutters, there is still a need to transport the bulky reel of coil tubing to the well site prior to performing the cutting operation.
Other conventional methods and apparatus for cutting tubulars in a wellbore rely upon wireline to transport the cutting tool into the wellbore. However, in these instances the actual separation of the downhole tubular is performed by explosives or chemicals, not by a rotating cutting member. While the use of wireline in these methods avoids time and expense associated with run-in strings of tubulars or coil tubing, chemicals and explosives are dangerous, difficult to transport and the result of their use in a downhole environment is always uncertain.
There is a need therefore, for a method and apparatus for separating downhole tubulars which is more effective and reliable than conventional, downhole cutters. There is yet a further need for an effective method and apparatus for separating downhole tubulars which does not rely upon a run-in string of tubular or coil tubing to transport the cutting member into the wellbore. There is yet a further need for a method and apparatus of separating downhole tubulars which does not rely on explosives or chemicals. There is a yet a further need for methods and apparatus for connecting a first tubular to a second tubular downhole while ensuring a strong connection therebetween.
The present invention provides methods and apparatus for cutting tubulars in a wellbore. In one aspect of the invention, a cutting tool having radially disposed rolling element cutters is provided for insertion into a wellbore to a predetermined depth where a tubular therearound will be cut into an upper and lower portion. The cutting tool is constructed and arranged to be rotated while the actuated cutters exert a force on the inside wall of the tubular, thereby severing the tubular therearound. In one aspect, the apparatus is run into the well on wireline which is capable of bearing the weight of the apparatus while supplying a source of electrical power to at least one downhole motor which operates at least one hydraulic pump. The hydraulic pump operates a slip assembly to fix the downhole apparatus within the wellbore prior to operation of the cutting tool. Thereafter, the pump operates a downhole motor to rotate the cutting tool while the cutters are actuated.
In another aspect of the invention, the cutting tool is run into the wellbore on a run-in string of tubular. Fluid power to the cutter is provided from the surface of the well and rotation of the tool is also provided from the surface through the tubular string. In another aspect, the cutting tool is run into the wellbore on pressurizable coiled tubing to provide the forces necessary to actuate the cutting members and a downhole motor providing rotation to the cutting tool.
In another aspect of the invention, the apparatus includes a cutting tool having hydraulically actuated cutting members, a fluid filled pressure compensating housing, a torque anchor section with hydraulically deployed slips, a brushless dc motor with a source of electrical power from the surface, and a reduction gear box to step down the motor speed and increase the torque to the cutting tool, as well as one or more hydraulic pumps to provide activation pressure for the slips and the cutting tool. In operation, the anchor activates before the rolling element cutters thereby allowing the tool to anchor itself against the interior of the tubular to be cut prior to rotation of the cutting tool. Hydraulic fluid to power the apparatus is provided from a pressure compensated reservoir. As oil is pumped into the actuated portions of the apparatus, the compensation piston moves downward to take up space of used oil.
In yet another aspect of the invention, an expansion tool and a cutting tool are both used to affix a tubular string in a wellbore. In this embodiment, a liner is run into a wellbore and is supported by a bearing on a run-in string. Disposed on the run-in string, inside of an upper portion of the liner is a cutting tool and therebelow an expansion tool. As the apparatus reaches a predetermined location of the wellbore, the expander is actuated hydraulically and the liner portion therearound is expanded into contact with the casing therearound. Thereafter, with the weight of the liner transferred from the run-in string to the newly formed joint between the liner and the casing, the expander is de-actuated and the cutter disposed thereabove on the run-in string is actuated. The cutter, through axial and rotational forces, separates the liner into an upper and lower portion. Thereafter, the cutter is de-actuated and the expander therebelow is re-actuated. The expansion tool expands that portion of the liner remaining thereabove and is then de-actuated. After the separation and expanding operations are complete, the run-in string, including the cutter and expander are removed from the wellbore, leaving the liner in the wellbore with a joint between the liner and the casing therearound sufficient to fix the liner in the wellbore.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides apparatus and methods to join tubulars in a wellbore providing a connection therebetween with increased strength that facilitates the expansion of one tubular into another.
So that the manner in which the above recited features, advantages and objects of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
By suitably pressurizing the core 115 of the tool 100, the pistons 120 can be driven radially outwards with a controllable force which is proportional to the pressurization, and thereby the rollers 116 and cutters 105 can be forced against the inner wall of a tubular in a manner described below. Conversely, when the pressurization of the core 115 of the tool 100 is reduced to below whatever is the ambient pressure immediately outside the tool 100, the pistons 120 (together with the piston-mounted rollers 116) are allowed to retract radially back into their respective recesses 114.
Hydraulic fluid to power the both the upper 230 and lower 235 pumps is provided from the pressure compensated reservoir 215. As fluid is pumped behind a pair of slip members 245a, 245b located on the slip assembly 220, the compensation piston will move in order to take up space of the fluid as it is utilized. Likewise, the rollers 116 of the cutting tool 100 operate on pressurized fluid from the reservoir 215.
The slip members 245a, 245b and the radially slidable pistons 210 housing the rollers 116 and cutters 105 preferably have return springs installed therebehind which will urge the pistons 245a, 245b, 210 to a return or a closed position when the power is removed and the pumps 230, 235 have stopped operating. Residual pressure within the system is relieved by means of a control orifice or valves in the supply line (not shown) to the pistons 245a, 245b, 120 of the slip assembly and the cutting tool 100. The valves or controlled orifices are preferably set to dump oil at a much lower rate than the pump output. In this manner, the apparatus of the present invention can be run into a wellbore to a predetermined position and then operated by simply supplying power from the surface via the wireline 205 in order to fix the apparatus 200 in the wellbore and cut the tubular. Finally, after the tubular 150 has been severed and power to the motor 225 has been removed, the slips 245a, 245b and cutters 105 will de-actuate with the slips 245a, 245b and the cutters 105 returning to their respective housings, allowing the apparatus 200 to be removed from the wellbore.
Referring again to
As the foregoing demonstrates, the present invention provides an easy efficient way to separate tubulars in a wellbore without the use of a rigid run-in string. Alternatively, the invention provides a trip saving method of setting a string of tubulars in a wellbore. Also provided is a space saving means of setting a liner in a wellbore by expanding a first section of tubular into a larger section of tubular therearound.
As illustrated by the foregoing, it is possible to form a mechanical connection between two tubulars by expanding the smaller tubular into the inner surface of the larger tubular and relying upon friction therebetween to affix the tubulars together. In this manner, a smaller string of tubulars can be hung from a larger string of tubulars in a wellbore. In some instances, it is necessary that the smaller diameter tubular have a relatively thick wall thickness in the area of the connection in order to provide additional strength for the connection as needed to support the weight of a string of tubulars therebelow that may be over 1,000 ft. in length. In these instances, expansion of the tubular can be frustrated by the excessive thickness of the tubular wall. For instance, tests have shown that as the thickness of a tubular wall increases, the outer surface of the tubular can assume a tensile stress as the interior surface of the wall is placed under a compressive radial force necessary for expansion. When using the expansion tool of the present invention to place an outwardly directed radial force on the inner wall of a relating thick tubular, the expansion tool, with its actuated rollers, places the inner surface of the tubular in compression. While the inside surface of the wall is in compression, the compressive force in the wall will approach a value of zero and subsequently take on a tensile stress at the outside surface of the wall. Because of the tensile stress, the radial forces applied to the inner surface of the tubular may be inadequate to efficiently expand the outer wall past its elastic limits.
In order to facilitate the expansion of tubulars, especially those requiring a relatively thick wall in the area to be expanded, formations are created on the outer surface of the tubular as shown in FIG. 15.
In use, the connection would be created as follows: A tubular string 500 with the features illustrated in
In another aspect, the invention provides a method and apparatus for expanding a first tubular into a second and thereafter, circulating fluid between the tubulars through a fluid path independent of the expanded area of the smaller tubular.
In operation, a tubular string having the features shown in
While foregoing is directed to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/712,789, filed Nov. 13, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,598,678, which is a Continuation-in-Part Application based upon U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/470,176, which was filed on Dec. 22, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,446,323 and upon U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/469,692, which was filed Dec. 22, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,148. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
761518 | Lykken | May 1904 | A |
988054 | Wiet | Mar 1911 | A |
1233888 | Leonard | Jul 1917 | A |
1301285 | Leonard | Apr 1919 | A |
1324303 | Carmichael | Dec 1919 | A |
1358818 | Bering | Nov 1920 | A |
1545039 | Deavers | Jul 1925 | A |
1561418 | Duda | Nov 1925 | A |
1569729 | Duda | Jan 1926 | A |
1597212 | Spengler | Aug 1926 | A |
1739932 | Ventresca | Dec 1929 | A |
1750627 | Crum | Mar 1930 | A |
1809988 | Raymond | Jun 1931 | A |
1880218 | Simmons | Oct 1932 | A |
1930825 | Raymond | Oct 1933 | A |
1952652 | Brannon | Mar 1934 | A |
1981525 | Price | Nov 1934 | A |
2017451 | Wickersham | Oct 1935 | A |
2214226 | English | Sep 1940 | A |
2216226 | Bumpous | Oct 1940 | A |
2383214 | Prout | Aug 1945 | A |
2424878 | Crook | Jul 1947 | A |
2499630 | Clark | Mar 1950 | A |
2519116 | Crake | Aug 1950 | A |
2627891 | Clark | Feb 1953 | A |
2633374 | Boice | Mar 1953 | A |
2663073 | Bieber et al. | Dec 1953 | A |
2695449 | Chauvin | Nov 1954 | A |
2754577 | Maxwell | Jul 1956 | A |
2898971 | Hempel | Aug 1959 | A |
3028915 | Jennings | Apr 1962 | A |
3039530 | Condra | Jun 1962 | A |
3087546 | Wooley | Apr 1963 | A |
3167122 | Lang | Jan 1965 | A |
3179168 | Vincent | Apr 1965 | A |
3186485 | Owen | Jun 1965 | A |
3188850 | Linthicum et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3191677 | Kinley | Jun 1965 | A |
3191680 | Vincent | Jun 1965 | A |
3195646 | Brown | Jul 1965 | A |
3203451 | Vincent | Aug 1965 | A |
3203483 | Vincent | Aug 1965 | A |
3245471 | Howard | Apr 1966 | A |
3297092 | Jennings | Jan 1967 | A |
3326293 | Skipper | Jun 1967 | A |
3353599 | Swift | Nov 1967 | A |
3354955 | Berry | Nov 1967 | A |
3467180 | Pensotti | Sep 1969 | A |
3477506 | Malone | Nov 1969 | A |
3489220 | Kinley | Jan 1970 | A |
3498376 | Sizer et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3583200 | Cvijanovic et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3669190 | Sizer et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3689113 | Blaschke | Sep 1972 | A |
3691624 | Kinley | Sep 1972 | A |
3712376 | Owen et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3746091 | Owen et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3776307 | Young | Dec 1973 | A |
3780562 | Kinley | Dec 1973 | A |
3785193 | Kinley et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3818734 | Bateman | Jun 1974 | A |
3820370 | Duffy | Jun 1974 | A |
3911707 | Minakov et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3948321 | Owen et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3977076 | Vieira et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4069573 | Rogers, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4127168 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4159564 | Cooper, Jr. | Jul 1979 | A |
4288082 | Setterberg, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4311194 | White | Jan 1982 | A |
4319393 | Pogonowski | Mar 1982 | A |
4324407 | Upham et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4349050 | Bergstrom et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4359889 | Kelly | Nov 1982 | A |
4362324 | Kelly | Dec 1982 | A |
4371199 | Kushner et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382379 | Kelly | May 1983 | A |
4387502 | Dom | Jun 1983 | A |
4389765 | Thompson, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4393931 | Muse et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4407150 | Kelly | Oct 1983 | A |
4414739 | Kelly | Nov 1983 | A |
4429620 | Burkhardt et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4445201 | Pricer | Apr 1984 | A |
4450612 | Kelly | May 1984 | A |
4470280 | Kelly | Sep 1984 | A |
4483399 | Colgate | Nov 1984 | A |
4487630 | Crook et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4502308 | Kelly | Mar 1985 | A |
4505142 | Kelly | Mar 1985 | A |
4505612 | Shelley, Jr. | Mar 1985 | A |
4531581 | Pringle et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4567631 | Kelly | Feb 1986 | A |
4581617 | Yoshimoto et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4588030 | Blizzard | May 1986 | A |
4626129 | Kothmann et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4697640 | Szarka | Oct 1987 | A |
4807704 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4848462 | Allwin | Jul 1989 | A |
4848469 | Baugh et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862966 | Lindsey et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866966 | Hagen | Sep 1989 | A |
4883121 | Zwart | Nov 1989 | A |
4976322 | Abdrakhmanov et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4997320 | Hwang et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5014779 | Meling et al. | May 1991 | A |
5048612 | Cochran | Sep 1991 | A |
5052483 | Hudson | Oct 1991 | A |
5052849 | Zwart | Oct 1991 | A |
5086845 | Baugh | Feb 1992 | A |
5156209 | McHardy | Oct 1992 | A |
5181570 | Allwin et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184687 | Abdrakhmanov et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5201817 | Hailey | Apr 1993 | A |
5267613 | Zwart et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271472 | Leturno | Dec 1993 | A |
5301760 | Graham | Apr 1994 | A |
5307879 | Kent | May 1994 | A |
5322127 | McNair et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5348095 | Worrall et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5366012 | Lohbeck | Nov 1994 | A |
5409059 | McHardy | Apr 1995 | A |
5435400 | Smith | Jul 1995 | A |
5467826 | Miller | Nov 1995 | A |
5472057 | Winfree | Dec 1995 | A |
5494106 | Gueguen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5520255 | Barr et al. | May 1996 | A |
5553679 | Thorp | Sep 1996 | A |
5560426 | Trahan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5636661 | Moyes | Jun 1997 | A |
5667011 | Gill et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685369 | Ellis et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5706905 | Barr | Jan 1998 | A |
5785120 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787984 | Mabile | Aug 1998 | A |
5887668 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901787 | Boyle | May 1999 | A |
5901789 | Donnelly et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918677 | Head | Jul 1999 | A |
5924745 | Campbell | Jul 1999 | A |
5960895 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979571 | Scott et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021850 | Wood et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029748 | Forsyth et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6065536 | Gudmestad et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070671 | Cumming et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073692 | Wood et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098717 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6325148 | Trahan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354373 | Vercaemer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425444 | Metcalfe et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6446323 | Metcalfe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446724 | Baugh et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6454013 | Metcalfe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457532 | Simpson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6571672 | Rudd | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631759 | Cook et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648075 | Badrak et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20010020532 | Baugh | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010040054 | Haugen et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020139540 | Lauritzen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020145281 | Metcalfe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166668 | Metcalfe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030085041 | Maguire et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030136561 | Metcalfe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
225326 | Sep 1910 | DE |
3213464 | Oct 1983 | DE |
4133802 | Oct 1991 | DE |
0952305 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0961007 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1 242 714 | Sep 2002 | EP |
14073 | Jun 1904 | GB |
730338 | May 1955 | GB |
792886 | Apr 1958 | GB |
997721 | Sep 1965 | GB |
1277461 | Jun 1972 | GB |
1448304 | Feb 1976 | GB |
1457843 | Dec 1976 | GB |
1582392 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2216926 | Oct 1989 | GB |
2313860 | Dec 1997 | GB |
2320734 | Jul 1998 | GB |
2329918 | Apr 1999 | GB |
2347445 | Sep 2000 | GB |
2350137 | Nov 2000 | GB |
976019 | May 1991 | RU |
WO 9201139 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9324728 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9325800 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9425655 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9721901 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9800626 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9902818 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9918328 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9923354 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0037766 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0037767 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0037771 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0183943 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0160545 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0238343 | May 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030106698 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09712789 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10348617 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09470176 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09712789 | US | |
Parent | 09469692 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09470176 | US |