The present invention relates to AC motor drive systems, and more particularly to methods and apparatus for fault tolerant control of AC motor drive systems in the presence of current sensor faults.
Most high performance AC motor drive systems today utilize phase current sensors. Phase current information is used for controlling the machine stator currents, which in turn indirectly control machine torque. Failure of a current sensor usually results in loss of control and shutdown of the AC motor drive system.
Recently, fault tolerant control of AC motor drives has been receiving attention in the literature due to increasing application of AC drives in the automotive industry. For example, Raymond Sepe, Jr. (“Fault Tolerant Operation of Induction Motor Drives with Automatic Controller Reconfiguration”, IEMDC 2001, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) addressed current sensor faults of the induction machine type drive. In the case of current sensor failure, the drive is reconfigured from indirect field-oriented control (IFOC) to volts/Hz scalar control. Although this approach may be suitable for asynchronous induction machine drives, it is not applicable to permanent magnet (PM) type synchronous machine drives.
Field oriented control schemes are the industry standard in high performance AC drives today. Field oriented control relies on synchronous frame current regulators to correctly control machine torque. Current information is most often obtained by sensing two of the three stator phase currents. Only two sensors are needed for a machine because the machine is presumed to have balanced three-phase currents. The third current is simply calculated from the two measured currents.
In the case of a current sensor failure, the machine currents become unregulated. Usually, current will become excessive and cause an inverter to enter a fault mode that shuts down the drive. Without current sensor information, a conventional drive system is unable to resume operation.
Some configurations of the present invention therefore provide a method for controlling an electric machine having current sensors for less than every phase of the electric machine. The method includes operating a processor to perform a test to determine whether a fault exists in one or more of the current sensors. The method further includes operating the processor to utilize a state observer of the electric machine to estimate states of the electric machine, wherein the state observer is provided input measurements from non-faulty current sensors, if there are any such current sensors. Measurements from the current sensor or sensors determined to be faulty are disregarded. The processor controls the electric machine utilizing results from the state observer. In some configurations, a first test is performed to preliminarily determine that a fault exists in one or more of the current sensors and another test is performed to finally determine that the fault exists in the one or more preliminarily determined current sensors. The first test may include a balancing test, a gain error test, and an offset error test.
Various configurations of the present invention provide an apparatus for controlling an electric machine having current sensors for less than every one of its phases. The apparatus includes an inverter configured to provide current to the electric machine and a processor configured to control the current provided to the electric machine by the inverter in accordance with a desired torque, power, or speed. The processor is further configured to utilize the inverter to test the current sensors to determine whether a fault exists in one or more of the current sensors. If a fault is determined to exist, the processor is also configured to utilize a state observer of the electric machine to estimate states of the electric machine, utilizing state input measurements from each non-faulty current sensor, if any. The processor is further configured to disregard the current sensor or sensors determined to be faulty; and to control the electric machine utilizing the inverter and results from the state observer.
Various configurations of the present invention allow AC motor drive systems to advantageously restart following detection of one or more current sensor faults. Thus, operation of the drive system can continue, albeit sometimes with reduced performance. Moreover, configurations of the present invention offer a type of fault control that is applicable to PM-type drive systems.
More particularly, configurations of the present invention allow an AC motor drive system to resume operation in a graceful manner, possibly with some degradation in performance. This capability may be important in certain applications. For example, configurations of the present invention utilized in an electric vehicle (EV) or hybrid-electric vehicle (HEV) allow a driver to “limp home” following a current sensor failure.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
More particularly, and referring to
In some configuration, control is accomplished utilizing a diagnostic component and a post-fault control component. To simplify the present explanation, it will be assumed that electric machine 22 is, in fact, an AC motor of the interior permanent magnet type, but the present invention is applicable to other types of motors, as well.
A sudden severe fault of a current sensor 18 or 20 will result in an over current malfunction of motor drive control apparatus 10. If there is no protection provided in the gate drive circuit for inverter 16, the severe fault will lead to unrecoverable faults of power semiconductors of inverter 16. Minor faults, such as gain and offset drifts of current sensors 18 and/or 20 would result in torque pulsations that are synchronized with inverter 16 output frequency. Large offset and/or scaling errors will degrade torque regulation. Offset and gain drift above a certain level will result in over current fault at high speeds of electric machine 22 and in heavy load conditions.
According to various configurations of the present invention, faults including the offset and gain drift are detected when electric machine 22 is not rotating. More particularly, processor 26 is configured, such as by a stored program, to utilize inverter 16 to test current sensors 18 and 20 to determine whether a fault exists in one or more of the current sensors. If a fault is determined to exist, processor 26 utilizes a state observer of electric machine 22 to estimate states of the electric machine, utilizing state input measurements from non-faulty current sensors 18 and/or 20, if any are non-faulty. Current sensors determined to be faulty are disregarded so that their measurements are not used. Processor 26 is further configured to control electric machine 22 utilizing inverter 16 and results from the state observer.
Thus, in some configurations and referring to
It can be seen that the transient term
can be suppressed by adjusting the phase of the applied voltage Vab according to power factor of circuit 30.
Processor 26 samples the sensed values of a-phase and b-phase currents ias and ibs, or more precisely, uses samples measurements from current sensors 18 and 20 as a function of time to infer time-varying currents ias and ibs. In
If the windings of electric machine 22, inverter 16, and current sensors 18 and 20 have no problem, sampled a-phase and b-phase currents ias and ibs, respectively, should be the same in magnitude and opposite in sign as shown in
for each phase current, individually. Thus, a gain error test comprises determining whether the RMS values of the sampled currents are within a (perhaps empirically determined) second predetermined limit that defines a predetermined nominal range. Furthermore, the sum of the measured values of each phase current should be around zero due to the zero DC transient and integer number of excitation cycles. A test of whether this sum is less than a (perhaps empirically determined) predetermined value or values comprises an offset error test. If the sum is not zero or near zero, there might be significant offset error in one or more current sensors 18, 20 or faults at inverter power circuit 16 or IPM motor 22 windings La, Lb, or Lc.
A combination of the balancing test, gain error test, and offset error test can determine whether one or more faults exists and preliminarily identify which of the two current sensors may be at fault. For example, if the balancing test or offset error test fails, one or both current sensors may be at fault. If the gain error test fails, the sampled current or currents that failed the test indicates which sensor may be at fault. These tests do not, however, rule out the possibility that something other than a sensor (e.g., a motor winding) may be at fault instead of a sensor. Thus, another test is performed if a fault is indicated to determine that the identified current sensor or sensors is or are at fault.
For this additional test, and referring to
If one or more current sensors are finally determined to be faulty, the measured value from the sensor is subsequently disregarded by processor 26. Instead, and referring to
The output of the observer is the estimated state vector {circumflex over (X)}, which contains the estimated synchronous frame currents îdsr and îqsr. Matrix A is a state matrix. Matrix C feeds back estimated states to be compared with measured stator currents (if available). Matrix L scales the measurement error to feedback into the observer as a correction term which reduces observer errors.
In some configurations and referring to
More generally, the state observer provided is modeled after the type of electric machine utilized as electric machine 22.
These experiments illustrate how moderate performance can be achieved in the presence of current sensor faults, thus allowing operation with degraded performance for the desired “limp home” capability.
More particularly, various configurations of the present invention allow AC motor drive systems to advantageously restart following detection of one or more current sensor faults. Thus, operation of the drive system can continue, albeit sometimes with reduced performance. Moreover, configurations of the present invention offer a type of fault control that is applicable to PM-type drive systems.
In addition, configurations of the present invention allow an AC motor drive system to resume operation in a graceful manner, possibly with some degradation in performance. Such capability is of great utility in electric vehicles (EV) and hybrid-electric vehicles (HEV), where such capability allows a driver to “limp home” or provide sufficient traction to pull the vehicle to a safe location following such a current sensor failure.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4509110 | Levesque et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4695941 | Kumar | Sep 1987 | A |
4761703 | Kliman et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4943758 | Tsurumiya | Jul 1990 | A |
5254921 | Matsubara | Oct 1993 | A |
5357181 | Mutoh et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5469032 | Otake | Nov 1995 | A |
5514978 | Koegl et al. | May 1996 | A |
5661380 | Obara et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677611 | Yoshihara et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689170 | Ishikawa | Nov 1997 | A |
5739649 | Akao | Apr 1998 | A |
5912539 | Sugitani et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6046553 | Matsunaga et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054827 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064172 | Kuznetsov | May 2000 | A |
6359405 | Tsurumi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6683435 | Liang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040239272 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |