The present invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for sealing vascular punctures and wounds, and more particularly, to a device that may be used to deliver ultrasound energy to a vascular puncture site to arrest bleeding.
Various surgical procedures are performed by medical specialists such as cardiologists and radiologists, utilizing percutaneous entry into a blood vessel. To facilitate cardiovascular procedures, a small gauge needle is introduced through the skin and into a target blood vessel, often the femoral artery. The needle forms a puncture through the blood vessel wall at the distal end of a tract that extends through the overlying tissue. A guide wire is then introduced through the bore of the needle, and the needle is withdrawn over the guide wire. An introducer sheath is next advanced over the guide wire; the sheath and guide wire are left in place to provide access during subsequent procedure(s). The sheath facilitates passage of a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic instruments and devices into the vessel and its tributaries. Illustrative diagnostic procedures include angiography, intravascular ultrasonic imaging, and the like; exemplary interventional procedures include angioplasty, atherectomy, stent and graft placement, embolization, and the like. After this procedure is completed, the catheters, guide wire, and introducer sheath are removed, and it is necessary to close the vascular puncture to provide hemostasis and allow healing.
The most common technique for achieving hemostasis is to apply hard pressure on the patient's skin in the region of the tissue tract and vascular puncture to form a blood clot. Initially, pressure is applied manually and subsequently is maintained through the use of mechanical clamps and other pressure-applying devices. While effective in most cases, the application of external pressure to the patient's skin presents a number of disadvantages. When applied manually, the procedure is time-consuming and requires the presence of a medical professional for thirty minutes or more. For both manual and mechanical pressure application, the procedure is uncomfortable for the patient and frequently requires the administration of analgesics to be tolerable. Moreover, the application of excessive pressure can occlude the underlying artery, resulting in ischemia and/or thrombosis. Even after hemostasis has apparently been achieved, the patient must remain immobile and under observation for hours to prevent dislodgment of the clot and to assure that bleeding from the puncture wound does not resume. Renewed bleeding through the tissue tract is not uncommon and can result in hematoma, pseudoaneurisms, and arteriovenous fistulas. Such complications may require blood transfusion, surgical intervention, or other corrective procedures. The risk of these complications increases with the use of larger sheath sizes, which are frequently necessary in interventional procedures, and when the patient is anticoagulated with heparin or other drugs.
In recent years, several hemostasis techniques have been proposed to address the problem of sealing vessel wall punctures following percutaneous transcatheter procedures. Related prior art is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,320,639; 5,370,660; 5,437,631; 5,591,205; 5,830,130; 5,868,778; 5,948,425; 6,017,359; and 6,090,130. In each of these patents, bioabsorbable, thrombogenic plugs comprising collagen and other materials are placed proximal to the vessel wall puncture site to stop bleeding. The large hemostasis plug stimulates blood coagulation in the vessel puncture site, but blocks the catheter entry tract, making catheter reentry more difficult, if required.
Other related prior art disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,707,393; 5,810,884; 5,649,959; and 5,350,399 provides for the use of small dissolvable disks or anchors that are placed in the vessel to block or clamp the puncture hole. However, any device remaining in the vessel lumen increases the risk of thrombus formation. Such a device also can detach and cause occlusion in a distal blood vessel, which would likely require major surgery to remove.
Additional prior art includes U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,779,719; 5,496,332; 5,810,850; and 5,868,762. In the disclosure of these patents, needles and sutures delivered through catheters are used to ligate the puncture. The suturing procedure requires particular skill. Suture material left in the vessel may cause tissue irritation that will prolong the healing process.
Still other prior art is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,626,601, wherein a procoagulant is injected into the puncture, with a balloon catheter blocking inside the vessel lumen. However, in some cases, the clotting agent may leak past the balloon into the vessel lumen and cause stenosis.
Yet other prior art references related to this topic include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,929,246; 5,810,810; and 5,415,657, which disclose the use of a laser or of radio-frequency (RF) energy that is transmitted to the blood vessel through a catheter to thermally fuse or weld the punctured tissue together.
All of the above cited prior art references require either introducing and leaving foreign objects in the patient's body, and/or inserting a tubular probe of large diameter into the tissue channel left by the catheter in order to seal the puncture.
As will be evident from the preceding discussion, there is a clear need for an improved method and apparatus for sealing a puncture left in a blood vessel, following an intravascular catheterization procedure. The method and apparatus should cause rapid cessation of bleeding, not rely on blood clot formation, and should be independent of the patient's coagulation status. By employing such a method and apparatus, the patient will be more comfortable as a result of shortened hemostasis and ambulation times, and physician and hospital resources will thereby be minimized. In addition, the method and apparatus should not leave any foreign object in the patient's body, to reduce the risk of stenosis at or distal to the puncture wound. An ideal device will be noninvasive and should not include any component that must be inserted in the catheter tract and which might further damage the wound and impede the sealing process.
In accord with the present invention, a method and apparatus are defined that provide advantageous solutions to the problem of expeditiously and safely sealing vascular catheter entry wounds made in connection with medical procedures. The method includes the steps of determining a site of the puncture in the vascular vessel and positioning an ultrasonic transducer applicator at a position adjacent to the site. The ultrasonic transducer applicator is coupled to a control that includes a processor programmed to administer ultrasonic energy in a manner that efficaciously seals a puncture. A user is enabled to initiate a process that is controlled by the control, so that very little operator training is required. The control automatically controls the ultrasonic transducer applicator so that the ultrasonic energy produced by the ultrasonic transducer applicator is focused at the site and is administered at a sufficient intensity and duration to denature tissue at the puncture, closing and sealing the puncture.
To determine the site of the puncture, an imaging ultrasonic beam is generated with the ultrasonic transducer applicator and is transmitted into the patient, proximate an expected location for the site. A reflection of the imaging ultrasonic beam is then received from within the patient using the ultrasonic transducer applicator, producing a corresponding output signal. The output signal is processed with the processor included in the control to facilitate determining the site of the puncture.
For example, a visual indication of a location of the site of the puncture can be provided to enable an operator to position the ultrasonic transducer applicator so that the ultrasonic energy produced by the ultrasonic transducer applicator is directed at the site. Such a visual indication may be in the form of, for example, lighted display indicators. In one form of the present invention, the visual indication includes an image of the site in which an axis of the vascular vessel is visually evident, enabling the operator to position the ultrasonic transducer applicator longitudinally along the axis of the vascular vessel so that the ultrasonic energy is directed at the site of the puncture.
In an alternative embodiment, an object is provided that extends into the puncture from outside the patient. The operator can then estimate the location of the puncture along the longitudinal axis of the vessel based upon a disposition of the object extending outside the patient. As yet a further alternative, the visual indication includes an image of the site in which the object extending into the puncture is evident. An estimate is made of the location of the puncture based upon a disposition of the object in the image.
Finally, the output signal can be processed with the processor to determine the site of the puncture. An indicator disposed on the ultrasonic transducer applicator can be controlled by the processor to provide an indication of a direction in which the ultrasonic transducer applicator should be moved to position it adjacent to the site of the puncture.
The processor is preferably used for automatically controlling at least one of a direction, an intensity, and a focus of the ultrasonic energy, to ensure that the ultrasonic energy is administered to the site of the puncture. Using the processor, the ultrasonic energy is directed so as to overscan the site of the puncture, ensuring that the puncture is closed and sealed. For example, the processor can move the focus of the ultrasonic energy while it is being administered, to overscan the site of the puncture. As another alternative, an ultrasound emitter of the ultrasonic transducer applicator has an aspheric shape so that the ultrasonic energy that is directed at the site of the puncture covers a larger area that overscans the site. Other transducer configurations that provide a laterally broadened focal region may also be employed.
Preferably, the ultrasonic transducer applicator uses a common array of transducers for generating both the imaging ultrasound beam and the ultrasound energy that closes and seals the puncture.
It is also contemplated that the administration of the ultrasonic energy be interrupted, to again generate the imaging ultrasound beam, thereby confirming whether the ultrasonic energy is being directed at the site of the puncture.
The processor is preferably employed to control a force applied against a surface of the patient using a force generator included in the ultrasonic transducer applicator. This force is controlled so that a pressure developed by the force is sufficient to substantially stop fluid leakage from the vascular vessel, but not so great as to substantially occlude fluid flow through the vascular vessel.
Another aspect of the invention is directed to enclosing the unit applicator within a protective, acoustic coupling shell. The protective, acoustic coupling shell is adapted to contact an external dermal portion of the patient in order to convey the ultrasonic energy transdermally to the site of the puncture, while isolating an ultrasonic emitter surface on the ultrasonic transducer from direct, contacting exposure to the patient. The protective, acoustic coupling shell is preferably pre-sterilized and preferably includes a gel patch on an outer surface that is protected by a tab. The tab is removed prior to contacting the external dermal surface of the patient.
Still another aspect of the present invention is directed to apparatus. The apparatus include elements that carry out functions generally consistent with the steps of the method discussed above.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Use of Ultrasound for Sealing Punctures
Because of its unique properties in soft tissue, ultrasound can be brought to a tight focus at a distance from its source. If sufficient energy is radiated within the ultrasound beam, cells located in the focal volume can be rapidly heated, while intervening and surrounding tissues are spared. Surrounding tissues are unaffected in the unfocused portion of the ultrasound beam because the energy is spread over a correspondingly larger area and associated heating is minimized.
Whereas ultrasound intensities on the order of 0.1 Watts/cm2 are employed in diagnostic imaging applications, intensities in excess of 1,000 Watts/cm2 are typical in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) applications. At the focal point, these high intensities result in large, controlled temperature rises within a matter of seconds.
It has been demonstrated in numerous in vivo animal studies that HIFU can rapidly seal blood vessel punctures and lacerations over a wide range of sizes. When accurately targeted on a vascular wound, ultrasound has been shown to induce complete hemostasis in less than one minute in the femoral, carotid, and axillary arteries, and in the femoral and jugular veins of large animals, while blood flow through the treated vessels remained unaffected. These investigations included: (a) sealing punctured, surgically exposed vessels using visual targeting, (b) sealing incised, surgically exposed vessels using visual targeting, (c) sealing surgically exposed, punctured vessels using Doppler-guided ultrasound targeting, and (d) noninvasive sealing of punctured vessels under ultrasound imaging guidance wherein complete hemostasis was noted in 13±12 seconds.
The mechanism of hemostasis in these ultrasound-exposed vascular wounds appears thermal in origin and involves denaturization of native perivascular collagen with subsequent formation of an extensive fibrin network that covers the hole, thereby sealing it closed. The fibrin links with adjacent vessel wall tissues to form a seal that has been shown to be independent of puncture hole size. Acoustic streaming forces generated by the HIFU beam were also observed to play a role in opposing the escape of blood from the vascular wound. Blood clotting is not believed to be a factor in achieving acoustic hemostasis, as evidenced by equally rapid and complete wound sealing in highly anticoagulated animals and in ex vivo vessels in which saline has been substituted for blood.
Overview of the Present Invention
The user enters various conventional scan and control parameters into an input unit 70, which typically includes user input devices 72. Examples of such devices include a keyboard, knobs, and buttons. The input unit is connected to a processing system 74, which will typically comprise a plurality of microprocessors and/or digital signal processors. Processing system 74 may, however, also be implemented using a single processor of sufficient speed to handle the various tasks described below. A conventional memory 75 will normally be included in the system to store, among other data, transmission control parameters and imaging data generated in any given implementation of the present invention.
Processing system 74 sets, adjusts, and monitors the operating parameters of a conventional transmission and control circuit 76. Control circuit 76 forms a transmit ultrasonic waveform by generating and applying electrical control and driving signals to an ultrasound transducer 78, which preferably comprises an array of individually controllable piezoelectric elements. As is well known in the art, the piezoelectric elements generate ultrasonic waves when electric, signals of a proper frequency are applied to them; conversely, when receiving reflected ultrasonic waves, they generate electrical signals corresponding to the mechanical vibrations caused by the returning ultrasonic waves.
Transducer 78 is positioned against it portion 82 of the body of a patient, and by varying the phasing, amplitude, and timing of the driving signals for the transducer array elements, ultrasonic waves are focused to form a transmit beam 314 of high-intensity ultrasound.
In
As will be clear from the description of the present invention below, it is not necessary for the system to include an imaging capability. However, the provision of an imaging capability, including pulse-echo lines of interrogation that are not displayed as images, in the present invention should assist a user to more accurately locate a vascular puncture site. It is recognized that a full display of the insonified vascular target site is not required.
Nonetheless, since imaging of a vascular target site is preferable and will employ echo processing (especially, Doppler),
Note that it is not essential, according to the present invention, that the transducer 78 be used externally, relative to the patient's body. It is also contemplated that the transducer may be maneuvered inside a patient's body, and the beam focused on a puncture from inside the body. For example, a transesophageal probe, laparoscopic, or other probe inserted into a body cavity, such as the vagina or rectum can be used to practice the present invention. A suitably designed probe inserted into an open body cavity or via minimally invasive means could be used to arrest bleeding in surgical or trauma care situations. Yet, most of the following discussion is directed to a preferred embodiment of the present invention in which the transducer is intended to be used externally, since an initial commercial product in accord with the present invention will be designed for such use.
A conventional display system 92 may also be included in order to display information concerning transmission power, time, focus data, etc. The display system will include known circuitry for scan conversion and for driving the display, as needed. These circuits are well known and therefore need not be specifically illustrated or described further to provide an enabling disclosure.
It should be noted that the present invention can be employed to seal vascular wounds of various types and is not limited to the type of wound created as a result of interventional procedures in which a catheter has been introduced into a vascular vessel. As noted above, application of thermal treatment to the tissue overlying a wound has been demonstrated to seal the wound. In the present invention, a practical method has been developed for repeatedly and reliably achieving sealing of the puncture in a vascular vessel.
Steps carried out in this method are shown in
Key steps in the method for vascular sealing described here include:
A clinically acceptable device for sealing a puncture wound in accord with the present invention must meet a number of requirements, including:
These requirements are met by the present invention, as described below, and as defined in the claims that follow. A preferred embodiment of the device includes the components shown in
As shown in
In the illustrated preferred embodiment, electrical connections comprising wires 26 are routed within the outer housing 10 and out in a sealed bushing 44 that mounts a cable 28 to the control unit 6. Cable 28 is sufficiently long, on the order of 10 feet in length, so that the control unit may be conveniently located at a distance from the patient and operator location.
Applicator unit housing 10 is shaped to be used with a slip-on, generally single-use protective applicator shell 4 (illustrated schematically in
Sterile, generally gas free acoustic coupling gel 62 is deposited in a patch on the bottom of flexible bottom 58. Prior to use, the gel is held in place and sealed by semi-sticky adhesive coated tab 60. Tab 60 is removed by the operator just prior to use, thereby exposing the gel so that it provides a good acoustic coupling with the surface of the patient's body. Protective applicator shell 4 thus provides a sterile barrier over the multi-use applicator unit and conveniently provides a pre-determined amount of a specific appropriate acoustic coupling medium. Although not shown, it is contemplated that the bottom of the interior cavity of the shell may also include a layer of acoustic coupling gel to ensure good acoustic coupling between the applicator unit through the protective, applicator coupling shell.
With reference to
In the preferred embodiment the architecture of control unit 6 is based on a programmable processing unit which processes various signals and controls a number of functional modules. A microprocessor is well suited to perform the computation and control functions required. Applicator unit 2 is coupled to control unit 6 by a plurality of signal paths 212, 214, 216, and 218. Signal path 212 couples display drivers 200, which are controlled by a computer/controller 236, with indicators 30, 32, 34, and 36 on the applicator unit. Control button 14 on the applicator unit is coupled through signal line 214 to an interface 202 and thus to the computer/controller. Force sensing transducer 42 produces an output signal indicative of the force (i.e., the pressure) applied against the surface of the patient's tissues by the applicator unit, and this signal is conveyed by signal lines 216 to an interface 204, which provides the signal to the computer/controller. In response to the magnitude of the monitored force, the computer/controller produces a control signal applied to a driver 206, which provides the current signal used to energize force transducer 16, to determine any additional force that it generates to achieve a desired pressure on the site of the puncture that is sufficient to prevent loss of fluid from the vessel, but not so great as to occlude the flow of fluid through the vessel.
Signal lines 240 couple ultrasonic array assembly 20 to a transmit/receive switch 224. The transmit/receive switch determines the operational mode of the ultrasonic array assembly under the control of the computer/controller. When operating in a diagnostic mode in which the ultrasonic array assembly is producing an imaging ultrasound beam, the signal corresponding to the echo reflected received by ultrasonic array assembly 20 from tissue and other structures is conveyed through transmit/receive switch 224 and through signal lines 222 to an amplifier digitizer array 220. The output signals from the amplifier digitizer array are conveyed to computer/controller 236 through signal lines 228. When the ultrasonic array assembly is generating either the imaging beam or the HIFU beam, it is responding to signals received from an RF generator 232 that is coupled to a phase shift/amplifier array 234 by signal lines 236, and to a control signal provided by the computer/controller and conveyed to the phase shift/amplifier on a signal line 230. The output of the phase shift/amplifier is conveyed on signal lines 226 to transmit/receive switch 224, and thus, to ultrasonic array assembly 20 through signal lines 240. Manual control inputs 241 are coupled to computer/controller 236 through signal lines 242.
A number of variously advantageous transducer configurations may alternatively be employed in this invention. Possibilities include:
An aspheric ultrasonic transducer configuration has the advantage of covering a large treatment area on the surface of the vessel without the complication of electronic or mechanical beam steering. Covering a large area (i.e., overscanning) is desired in order to ensure that the actual site of the puncture wound is treated, given its positional ambiguity.
In one preferred embodiment, the method described includes a series of manual steps (operator actions) and automated steps. The automated steps are carried out as control processes or algorithms executed by one or more processors and other hardware in accord with machine instructions executed by the one or more processors. It is understood that variations in the order of these steps, and in the total complement of steps implemented is possible in alternative embodiments. Steps as shown in
In a step 100 labeled Patient Preparation, the operator positions the patient and the apparatus so that the applicator unit is conveniently positioned over the puncture wound area, e.g., over the puncture made by a catheter in the femoral artery. Shell 4 is removed from its sterile package and fitted onto applicator unit 2, and gel sealing tab 60 (shown in
A step 102 labeled Manually Align is then carried out. With the catheter introducer in the wound, the operator palpates the area locating the point at which the introducer just enters the artery. The operator marks this location on the patient's skin with a suitable marking device (e.g. a surgical marker), drawing a line substantially perpendicular to the perceived direction of the artery, extending approximately 3 cm from the entry wound location. It is the purpose of this marking to estimate the longitudinal location of the wound; the operation of the HIFU sealing process provides for an overscan of the wound area so that practical variations in the operator's ability to make the longitudinal position estimate are permissible. Other techniques for locating the site of the puncture are discussed below. In a more preferred embodiment, lateral and range locations of the wound are more precisely located by the automated capability of the processor(s) used in the apparatus.
Also within step 102, the operator places the device over the wound location, aligning fiducial mark “56” (shown in
The axial alignment indications are, in this preferred embodiment, derived from two ultrasonic pulsed Doppler interrogations.
In the alignment sequence illustrated in
Alternatively, another advantageous configuration for guiding the manual alignment process uses multiple Doppler lines and multiple indicators, with reference to
With verified alignment in step 106. the system proceeds to a step 108 labeled Set Pressure, wherein the pressure over the artery is set and controlled within a predetermined range using force generator 18 (
In this preferred embodiment, when the system has completed the pressure application cycle described above, indicator 32 (
A step 116 then makes a ranging measurement to estimate the acoustic path length between ultrasonic transducer assembly 20 and the vessel boundary. i.e. the distance between points F and C along line 306 in
FC˜(FE COS A+FD COS B)/2 Equation 1
A step 120 estimates the acoustic attenuation at the therapeutic frequency between ultrasonic transducer assembly 20 and the target collagen layer overlaying the vascular wound, path F-C in
A step 122 determines the therapeutic ultrasound exposure parameters to be employed. Dimension F-C, the attenuation estimate, and optionally, patient parameters (e.g., size and weight), input at module 240 in
Ultrasound scan geometry, intensity and time parameters are determined to accomplish three key objectives: (1) provide a sufficient overscan of a longitudinal and lateral surface of the target vessel so as to include the site of the wound; (2) ensure delivery of an appropriate energy dose to the collagen layer in the region of the target site to raise its temperature to a range of between 60 and 100 degrees Celsius for a predetermined period of time; and, (3) assure that the skin and interpath tissue is not exposed to a temperature-time exposure that will result in pain and or irreversible tissue damage.
Therapeutic scan geometry is shown in
A step 126 carries out the therapeutic exposure cycle. It is generally desirable to hold the applicator unit in place, providing the established orientation and pressure for a period of time after the therapeutic exposure cycle. A hold interval 130 (
In situations where there is concern for inadvertent exposure of a nerve structure, an additional sequence depicted in
Alternative Techniques for Aligning the Applicator Unit
Step 102, which facilitates alignment of the applicator unit over the wound area and targeting of the therapeutic exposure, may be accomplished using several alternative approaches compared to that described above. It is desired to employ an approach for targeting and aligning the applicator unit that is easy to implement and requires minimum operator instruction. The approach further should be consistent with minimizing bleeding during the process of achieving alignment. Additionally, the approach should be robust and provide targeting of the wound site with sufficient accuracy such that the wound will reliably be included within the area of therapeutic exposure.
A principle employed in the present invention is the concept that the overscan of the target location during therapeutic exposure is sufficient to accommodate targeting ambiguity and possible patient or operator movement during the procedure. Nevertheless, accurate targeting is needed to ensure efficacy of the wound sealing process.
In the preferred embodiment described above, pulsed Doppler ranging was employed to locate the axis of the vessel, and the operator was advised of the longitudinal location of the wound on the vessel by reference to visual landmarks on the skin surface. Alternatively, by inclusion of additional automation, the need for the operator to locate the longitudinal position is eliminated, thereby substantially simplifying the targeting procedure for the operator.
These alternative approaches make use of the entry channel along which the introducer and guide wire are commonly passed during diagnostic and interventional catheterization procedures.
A sufficient number of the parameters in the above described geometry may be determined by several novel methods and their associated apparatus. As previously described, acoustic pulsed Doppler may be employed to determine the distance “C”-“F” (reference
The spatial location of line 512 may be determined by employing a substantially rigid, straight locator rod 554 as depicted in
Several alternative approaches may be employed to determine the spatial location of the longitudinal axis of locator rod 554 and thus, to determine precise wound location as described above. These approaches include:
Although the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred form of practicing it, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that many modifications can be made thereto within the scope of the claims that follow. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the invention in any way be limited by the above description, but instead be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/896,740, filed Oct. 1, 2010, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/619,996, filed Jan. 4, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/616,831, filed Jul. 10, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/696,076, filed Oct. 25, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,656,136, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/163,466, filed Oct. 25, 1999, and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/171,703, filed Dec. 23, 1999.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
385256 | Eggers | Jun 1888 | A |
3274437 | Mastrup | Sep 1966 | A |
3499437 | Balamuth | Mar 1970 | A |
3552382 | Mount | Jan 1971 | A |
3847016 | Ziedonis | Nov 1974 | A |
3927662 | Ziedonis | Dec 1975 | A |
4059098 | Murdock | Nov 1977 | A |
4167180 | Kossoff | Sep 1979 | A |
4197856 | Northrop | Apr 1980 | A |
4206763 | Pedersen | Jun 1980 | A |
4237901 | Taenzer | Dec 1980 | A |
4273127 | Auth et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4315514 | Drewes et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4469099 | McEwen | Sep 1984 | A |
4479494 | McEwen | Oct 1984 | A |
4484569 | Driller et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4545386 | Hetz et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4594895 | Fujii | Jun 1986 | A |
4601296 | Yerushalmi | Jul 1986 | A |
4605010 | McEwen | Aug 1986 | A |
4688578 | Takano et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4708836 | Gain et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4748985 | Nagasaki | Jun 1988 | A |
4757820 | Itoh | Jul 1988 | A |
4770175 | McEwen | Sep 1988 | A |
4773865 | Baldwin | Sep 1988 | A |
4784148 | Dow et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4841979 | Dow et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850363 | Yanagawa | Jul 1989 | A |
4858613 | Fry et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4905672 | Schwarze et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4913155 | Dow et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4929246 | Sinofsky | May 1990 | A |
4931047 | Broadwin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938216 | Lele | Jul 1990 | A |
4938217 | Lele | Jul 1990 | A |
4957099 | Hassler | Sep 1990 | A |
5005579 | Wurster et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
RE33590 | Dory | May 1991 | E |
5026387 | Thomas | Jun 1991 | A |
5036855 | Fry et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5039774 | Shikinami et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042486 | Pfeller et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5065742 | Belikan et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5080101 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5080102 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5150712 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5170790 | Lacoste et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178135 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178148 | Lacoste et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181522 | McEwen | Jan 1993 | A |
5194291 | D'Aoust et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211160 | Talish et al. | May 1993 | A |
5215680 | D'Arrigo | Jun 1993 | A |
5219401 | Cathignol et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230334 | Klopotek | Jul 1993 | A |
5230921 | Waltonen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233994 | Shmulewitz | Aug 1993 | A |
5243988 | Sieben et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5254087 | McEwen | Oct 1993 | A |
5263957 | Davison | Nov 1993 | A |
5290278 | Anderson | Mar 1994 | A |
5307816 | Hashimoto et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311869 | Okazaki | May 1994 | A |
5312431 | McEwen | May 1994 | A |
5318035 | Konno et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5352195 | McEwen | Oct 1994 | A |
5364389 | Anderson | Nov 1994 | A |
5383896 | Gershony et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391140 | Schaetzle et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391197 | Burdette et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394877 | Orr et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5415657 | Taymor-Luria | May 1995 | A |
5439477 | McEwen | Aug 1995 | A |
5453576 | Krivitski | Sep 1995 | A |
5454373 | Koger et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5454831 | McEwen | Oct 1995 | A |
5471988 | Fujio et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474071 | Chapelon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492126 | Hennige et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503152 | Oakley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507744 | Tay et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507790 | Weiss | Apr 1996 | A |
5515853 | Smith et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520188 | Hennige et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522878 | Montecalvo et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524620 | Rosenschein | Jun 1996 | A |
5526815 | Granz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534232 | Denes et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536489 | Lohrmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553618 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556415 | McEwen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5578055 | McEwen | Nov 1996 | A |
5584853 | McEwen | Dec 1996 | A |
5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607447 | McEwen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609485 | Bergman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5626601 | Gershony et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628730 | Shapland et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630837 | Crowley | May 1997 | A |
5638823 | Akay et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643179 | Fujimoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5649954 | McEwen | Jul 1997 | A |
5655538 | Lorraine et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5655539 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657760 | Ying et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665073 | Bulow et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681339 | McEwen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685307 | Holland et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695493 | Nakajima et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697897 | Buchholtz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
D389574 | Emerson et al. | Jan 1998 | S |
5704361 | Seward et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711058 | Frey et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713363 | Seward et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716374 | Francese et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720286 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720287 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726066 | Choi | Mar 1998 | A |
5735796 | Granz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738635 | Chapelon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741295 | McEwen | Apr 1998 | A |
5755228 | Wilson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762066 | Law et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769790 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788636 | Curley | Aug 1998 | A |
5807285 | Vaitekunas et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810007 | Holupka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810810 | Tay et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817021 | Reichenberger | Oct 1998 | A |
5823962 | Schaetzle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824015 | Sawyer | Oct 1998 | A |
5824277 | Campos | Oct 1998 | A |
5827204 | Grandia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827268 | Laufer | Oct 1998 | A |
5833647 | Edwards | Nov 1998 | A |
5840028 | Chubachi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846517 | Unger | Dec 1998 | A |
5852860 | Lorraine et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853752 | Unger et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855589 | McEwen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873828 | Fujio et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879314 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882302 | Driscoll et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895356 | Andrus | Apr 1999 | A |
5904659 | Duarte | May 1999 | A |
5906580 | Kline-Schoder et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911735 | McEwen | Jun 1999 | A |
5919139 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
5921994 | Andreas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922945 | Allmaras et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931786 | Whitmore, III et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5931853 | McEwen | Aug 1999 | A |
5935144 | Estabrook | Aug 1999 | A |
5935146 | McEwen | Aug 1999 | A |
5935339 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951476 | Beach | Sep 1999 | A |
5957849 | Munro | Sep 1999 | A |
5964782 | Lafontaine et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976092 | Chinn | Nov 1999 | A |
5979453 | Savage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993389 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997481 | Adams et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013031 | Mendlein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014473 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6033506 | Klett | Mar 2000 | A |
6036650 | Wu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037032 | Klett et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039694 | Larson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042556 | Beach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050943 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067371 | Gouge et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068596 | Weth et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071239 | Cribbs et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6071277 | Farley et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078831 | Belef et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083159 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087761 | Lorraine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102860 | Mooney | Aug 2000 | A |
6106463 | Wilk | Aug 2000 | A |
6120453 | Sharp | Sep 2000 | A |
6128522 | Acker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6179831 | Bliweis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182341 | Talbot et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193660 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200268 | Vince et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200539 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206843 | Iger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213939 | McEwen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217530 | Martin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221015 | Yock | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231507 | Zikorus et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233477 | Chia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246156 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254601 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259945 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261233 | Kantorovich | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263551 | Lorraine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267734 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270458 | Barnea | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277077 | Brisken et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311692 | Vaska et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315441 | King | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6332089 | Acker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6361496 | Zikorus et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361548 | McEwen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6398792 | O'Connor | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6399149 | Klett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406759 | Roth | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409720 | Hissong et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419669 | Frazier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425867 | Vaezy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425876 | Frangi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432067 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443894 | Sumanaweera et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453526 | Lorraine et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6488639 | Ribault et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491672 | Slepian et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494848 | Sommercorn et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500133 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520915 | Lin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6548047 | Unger | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551576 | Unger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559644 | Froundlich et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562037 | Paton et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565557 | Sporri et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576168 | Hardcastle et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584360 | Francischelli et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6595934 | Hissong et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599256 | Acker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599288 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602251 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612988 | Maor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6616624 | Kieval | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633658 | Dabney et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652461 | Levkovitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656131 | Alster et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6656136 | Weng et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676601 | Lacoste et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682483 | Abend et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685639 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706892 | Ezrin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709392 | Salgo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709407 | Fatemi | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716184 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719699 | Smith | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726627 | Lizzi et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735461 | Vitek et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6755789 | Stringer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764488 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6846291 | Smith et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868739 | Krivitski et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875176 | Mourad et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6875420 | Quay | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6905498 | Hooven | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932771 | Whitmore et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955648 | Mozayeni et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978174 | Gelfand et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7022077 | Mourad et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052463 | Peszynski et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063666 | Weng et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128711 | Medan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149564 | Vining et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162303 | Levin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7211060 | Talish et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7260250 | Summers et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7285093 | Anisimov et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7445599 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7470241 | Weng et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7499748 | Moffitt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510536 | Foley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530958 | Slayton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534209 | Abend et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553284 | Vaitekunas | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7617005 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620451 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628764 | Duarte et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7684865 | Aldrich et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697972 | Verard et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20010014775 | Koger et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014805 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032382 | Lorraine et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041910 | McEwen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044636 | Pedros et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032394 | Brisken et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020055736 | Horn et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095164 | Andreas et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020193831 | Smith, III | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009194 | Saker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018255 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036771 | McEwen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050665 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069569 | Burdette et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114756 | Li | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120204 | Unger et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153849 | Huckle et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030195420 | Mendlein et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208101 | Cecchi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216792 | Levin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002654 | Davidson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030227 | Littrup et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030268 | Weng et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054287 | Stephens | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054289 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078034 | Acker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078219 | Kaylor | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082978 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097840 | Holmer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106880 | Weng et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113524 | Baumgartner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122493 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127798 | Dala-Krishna et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153126 | Okai | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158154 | Hanafy et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040234453 | Smith | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254620 | Lacoste et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267252 | Washington et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043625 | Oliver et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046311 | Baumgartner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054955 | Lidgren | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065436 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070790 | Niwa et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085793 | Glossop | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090104 | Yang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096542 | Weng et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124884 | Bolorforosh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154299 | Hoctor et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165298 | Larson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182297 | Gravenstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182319 | Glossop | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240102 | Rachlin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240103 | Byrd et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240126 | Foley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240170 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060025756 | Francischelli et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058678 | Vitek et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060122514 | Byrd et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184069 | Vaitekunas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235300 | Weng et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070004984 | Crum et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055155 | Owen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106339 | Errico et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142879 | Greenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149880 | Willis | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167806 | Wood et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179379 | Weng et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213616 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233185 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239000 | Emery et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265687 | Deem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080033292 | Shafran | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039746 | Hissong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045864 | Candy et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045865 | Kislev | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047325 | Bartlett | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080200815 | Van Der Steen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234569 | Tidhar et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255498 | Houle | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255642 | Zarins et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312561 | Chauhan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317204 | Sumanaweera et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319375 | Hardy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012098 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036948 | Levin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054770 | Daigle | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062697 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062873 | Wu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076409 | Wu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088623 | Vortman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112095 | Daigle | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112133 | Deisseroth et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090163982 | deCharms | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090221939 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247911 | Novak et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264755 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306644 | Mayse et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326379 | Daigle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100092424 | Sanghvi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125269 | Emmons et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100174188 | Wang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110028867 | Choo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110118602 | Weng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110178403 | Weng et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178445 | Weng et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110230763 | Emery et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230796 | Emery et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4110308 | Oct 1992 | DE |
4230415 | Mar 1994 | DE |
102 09 380 | Sep 2003 | DE |
0 225 120 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0 239 999 | Oct 1987 | EP |
0 383 270 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0420758 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 679 371 | Nov 1995 | EP |
1 219 245 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1265223 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 449 583 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1874192 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2181342 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2303131 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2672486 | Aug 1992 | FR |
WO 9731364 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9811840 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9858588 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9907432 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9922652 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9948621 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0072919 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0134018 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 02069805 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2004064598 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086086 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005030295 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005056105 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006113445 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007073551 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2009026534 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009158399 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 0153757 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011053757 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011053772 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vaezy et al., Use of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound to Control Bleeding, 1999, The Society for Vascular Surgery, pp. 533-542. |
Mughal et al., Assessment of Bone Status Using the Contact Ultrasound Bone Analyser, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1997, p. 535-536. |
Accord et al., “The Issue of Transmurality in Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.” Cardiothoracic Surgery Network: 3pp, Feb. 8, 2007. |
Amenta et al., “A New Voronoi-Based Surface Reconstruction Algorithm.” Computer Graphics: 7pp, 1998. |
American Red Cross., “Blood 101.” 4pp., Dec. 11, 2007. |
Anand et al., “Monitoring formation of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) induced lesions using backscattered ultrasound.” Acoustical Society of America; Mar. 10, 2004. |
Anand et al., “Using the ATL 1000 to Collect Domodulated RF Data for Monitoring HIFU Lesion Formation.” Presented at SPIE Medical Imaging 2003. 11pp, 2003. |
Aurenhammer, F. “Voronoi diagrams—A Survey of a Fundamental Geometric Data Structure.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 23, No. 3: 345-405, Sep. 1991. |
Bachmann et al., “Targeting Mucosal Addressin Cellular Adhesion Molecule (MAdCAM)-1 to Noninvasively Image Experimental Crohn's Disease.” Gastroenterology; vol. 130: 8-16, 2006. |
Barthe et al. “Efficient Wideband Linear Arrays for Imaging and Therapy” IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. pp. 1249-1252 (1999). |
Bauer et al., “Ultrasound Imaging with SonoVue: Low Mechanical Index Real-Time Imaging.” Acad. Radiol.; vol. 9, Suppl. 2: S282-S284, 2002. |
Beard et al., “An Annular Focus Ultrasonic Lens for Local Hyperthermia Treatment of Small Tumors.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology; vol. 8, No. 2: 177-184, 1982. |
Bokarewa et al., “Tissue factor as a proinflammatory agent.” Arthritis Research, vol. 4: 190-195, Jan. 10, 2002. |
Bots et al., “Intima Media Thickness as a Surrogate Marker for Generalised Atherosclerosis.” Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, ProQuest Medical Library; vol. 16, No. 4: 341-351, Jul. 2002. |
Brayman et al., “Erosion of Artificial Endothelia In Vitro by Pulsed Ultrasound: Acoustic Pressure, Frequency, Membrane Orientation and Microbubble Contrast Agent Dependence.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology; vol. 25, No. 8: 1305-1320, 1999. |
Buller et al., “Accurate Three-dimensional Wall Thickness Measurement From Multi-Slice Short-Axis MR Imaging.” Computers in Cardiology, 245-248, 1995. |
Byram et al., “3-D Phantom and In Vivo Cardiac Speckle Tracking Using a Matrix Array and Raw Echo Data.” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 57, No. 4; 839-854, Apr. 2010. |
Campese, V., Krol, E. Neurogenic Factors in Renal Hypertension. Current Hypertension Reports 2002, 4:256-260. |
Canadian Examination Report dated Nov. 14, 2007 in CA Patent Application 2,387,127, filed Oct. 25, 2000. |
Chao et al., “Aspheric lens design.” Ultrasonics Symposium, 2000 IEEE, vol. 2: Abstract Only, Oct. 2000. |
Chelule et al., “Fabrication of Medical Models From Scan Data via Rapid Prototyping Techniques.” 9 pp., Feb. 7, 2007. |
Chen et al., “A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 113, No. 1: 643-665, Jan. 2003. |
Chen et al., “Inertial Cavitation Dose and Hemolysis Produced In Vitro With or Without Optison.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 29, No. 5: 725-737, 2003. |
Chen et al., DC-Biased Electrostrictive Materials and Transducers for Medical Imaging, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, IEEE, Aug. 1997. |
Chong et al., “Tissue Factor and Thrombin Mediate Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.” The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, vol. 75: S649-655, 2003. |
Damianou, et al., “Application of the Thermal Dose Concept for Predicting the Necrosed Tissue Volume During Ultrasound Surgery”, IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, (1993) 1199-1202. |
Dayton et al., “The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, No. 5, Part 1: 2183-2192, Nov. 2002. |
Dempsey et al., “Thickness of Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaque and Ischemic Risk.” Neurosurgery, vol. 27, No. 3: 343-348, 1990. |
Dewhirst, et al., “Basic principles of thermal dosimetry and thermal thresholds for tissue damage from hyperthermia”, Int. J. Hyperthermia, (2003) 19(3):267-294. |
Dibona, G. F., et al., Chaotic behavior of renal sympathetic nerve activity: effect of baroreceptor denervation and cardiac failure, Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 279:F491-501, 2000. |
Dibona, G.F.: “Neural control of the kidney: functionally specific renal sympathetic nerve fibers.” Am J. Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 279: R1517-1524, 2000. |
Dibona, GF. Functionally Specific Renal Sympathetic Nerve Fibers: Role in Cardiovascular Regulation. American Journal of Hypertension. 2001 vol. 14(6) 163S-170S. |
Doumas, M., et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation: The Jury is Still Out, The Lancet, Nov. 2010, vol. 376, Issue 9756, pp. 1878-1880. |
Ebbini et al., “Image-guided noninvasive surgery with ultrasound phased arrays.” SPIE, vol. 3249: 230-239, Apr. 2, 1998. |
Edelsbrunner, Herbert. “Geometry and Topology for Mesh Generation.” Cambridge University Press: 68pp, 2001. |
Esler, Murray D., et al., Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatmentresistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial, Nov. 2010, The Lancet, vol. 376, Issue 9756, pp. 1903-1909. |
European Examination Report dated Mar. 7, 2008 in EP Patent Application 989717.4, filed Oct. 25, 2000. |
Everbach et al., “Cavitational Mechanisms in Ultrasound-Accelerated Thrombolysis at 1 MHz.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 26, No. 7: 1153-1160, 2000. |
Ewert et al., “Anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies stimulate neutrophils to damage human endothelial cells.” Kidney International, vol. 41: 375-383, 1992. |
Fjield et al.; “A parametric study of the concentric-ring transducer design for MRI guided ultrasound surgery.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am 100 (2) Pt. 1, Aug. 1996. |
Ganapathy et al., “A New General Triangulation Method for Planar Contours.” Computer Graphics vol. 16, No. 3:69-75, 1982. |
Grassi, G. Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System in Human Hypertension. Journal of Hypertension. 1998, 16: 1979-1987. |
Gray, Henry. “The Skull.” Anatomy of the Human Body: 7pp., 1918. |
Guzman et al., “Ultrasound—Mediated Disruption of Cell Membranes. I. Quantification of Molecular uptake and Cell Viability. / II. Heterogeneous effects on cells.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 110, No. 1: 588-606, Jul. 2001. |
Hachimine, K. et. al. Sonodynamic Therapy of Cancer Using a Novel Porphyrin Derivative, DCPH-P-Na(I),which is Devoid of Photosensitivity. Cancer Science 2007; 98: 916-920. |
Hadimioglu et al., “High-Efficiency Fresnel Acoustic Lenses.” Ultrasonics Symposium 1993 IEEE: 579-582, 1993. |
Han et al., “A Fast Minimal Path Active Contour Model.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 10, No. 6: 865-873, Jun. 2001. |
Hatangadi, Ram. “A Novel Dual Axis Multiplanar Transesophageal Ultrasound Probe for Three-Dimensional Echocardiograph.” University of Washington, Department of Sciences and Engineering, vol. 55-11B: Abstract 1pg, 1994. |
Holt et al., “Bubbles and Hifu: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” Boston University, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering: 120-131, 2002. |
Hubka et al., “Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular wall thickness: In vitro and in vivo validation.” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 15, No. 2: 129-135, 2002. |
Hutchinson et al. “Intracavitary Ultrasound Phased Arrays for Noninvasive Prostate Surgery.” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics. Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 43(6):1032-1042 (1996). |
Hwang et al., “Vascular Effects Induced by Combined 1-MHz Ultrasound and Microbubble Contrast Agent Treatments In Vivo.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 31, No. 4: 553-564, 2005. |
Hynynen et al., “Potential Adverse Effects of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure on Blood Vessels In Vivo.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 22, No. 2: 193-201, 1996. |
Iannuzzi et al., “Ultrasonographic Correlates of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke.” Stroke, ProQuest Medical Library, vol. 26, No. 4: 614-619, 1995. |
Idell et al., “Fibrin Turnover in Lung Inflammation and Neoplasia.” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 163: 578-584, 2001. |
Indman, Paul. “Alternatives in Gynecology.” Hysteroscopy, OBGYN.net, Oct. 14, 2004. http://www.gynalternatives.com/hsc.html. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 5, 2003 for PCT Application No. PCT/US00/35262. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2001 for PCT Application No. PCT/US00/35262. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 4, 2005 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/001893. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 11, 2007 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/041163. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2008 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/087310. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 30, 2007 for Application No. PCT/US2006/027688 filed on Jul. 13, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 18, 2001 for PCT Application No. PCT/US00/41606. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 29, 2007 for PCT Application No. PCT/US04/31506. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial International Search Report dated Nov. 29, 2006 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/027688. |
Janssen, BJ and Smits, J. Renal Nerves in Hypertension. Mineral and Electrolyte Metabolism. 1090; 15:74-82, 1989. |
Jolesz, F. MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery. Annual Review of Medicine. 2009 60: 417-30. |
Kaczkowski et al., “Development of a High Intensity Focused Ultrasound System for Image-Guided Ultrasonic Surgery.” Ultrasound for Surgery, Oct. 14, 2004. (http://cimu.apl.washington.edu/hifusurgerysystem.html). |
Kang et al., “Analysis of the Measurement Precision of Arterial Lumen and Wall Areas Using High-Resolution MRI.” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 44: 968-972, 2000. |
Klibanov et al., “Detection of Individual Microbubbles of an Ultrasound contrast Agent: Fundamental and Pulse Inversion Imaging.” Academy of Radiology, vol. 9, Suppl. 2: S279-S281, 2002. |
Kojima, T., Matrix Array Transducer and Flexible Matrix ARRY Transducer,Proceedings of the Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2:649-653 (1986). |
Krum, H et. al. Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: a Multicentre Safety and Proof-of-Principle Cohort Study. Lancet 2009 373; 1275-81. |
Krum, H. et. al. Pharmacologic Management of the Cardiorenal Syndrome in Heart FAilure. Current Heart Failure Reports 2009, 6: 105-111. |
Kudo et al., “Study on Mechanism of Cell Damage Caused by Microbubbles Exposed to Ultrasound.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 29, Supplement: 4pp, 2003. |
Lalonde et al., “Field conjugate acoustic lenses for ultrasound hyperthermia.” Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions, vol. 40, Issue 5: Abstract 1 pg., Sep. 1993. |
Martin et al., Hemostasis of Punctured Vessels Using Doppler-Guided High Intensity Ultrasound, Ultrasound in Med.& Biol., vol. 25, pp. 985-990, 1999, USA. |
Meyers, D. “Multiresolution tiling.” Computer Graphics, No. 5: 325-340, 1994. |
Miller et al., “A Review of In Vitro Bioeffects of Inertial Ultrasonic Cavitation From a Mechanistic Perspective.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 22, No. 9: 1131-1154, 1996. |
Miller et al., “Diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies induces capillary rupture in mice.” PNAS, vol. 97, No. 18: 10179-10184, 2000. |
Moss, Nicholas G. Renal Function and Renal Afferent and Efferent Nerve Activity. American Journal Physiology. 243 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiology) 12: F425-F433, 1982. |
n. a., “Breast Cancer—Insightec: focused ultrasound for non invasive treatment.” FAQ, Oct. 14, 2004. (http://www.exablate2000.com/physicians—faq.html). |
n. a., “Cavitation.” Ultrasound TIP—U.S. Database: Dec. 12, 2007. |
n. a., “Mechanical Bioeffects in the Presence of Gas-Carrier Ultrasound Contrast Agents.” Journal of Ultrasound & Medicine, vol. 19: 120-142, 2000. |
Ng et al., “Therapeutic Ultrasound: Its Application in Drug Delivery.” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 22, No. 2: 204-233, 2002. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 25, 2003 from U.S. Appl. No. 09/696,076, filed Oct. 25, 2000. |
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,195. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/619,996. |
Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2006 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/671,417, filed Sep. 24, 2003. |
Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,656. |
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,938. |
Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/619,996. |
Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2007 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/671,417, filed Sep. 24, 2003. |
Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/616,831. |
Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,528. |
Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/247,969. |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/247,969. |
Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,569. |
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/202,195. |
Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2002 from U.S. Appl. No. 09/696,076, filed Oct. 25, 2000. |
Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,526. |
Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,256. |
Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,656. |
O'Leary et al., “Carotid-artery Intima and Media Thickness as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Older Adults.” Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, No. 1: 14-22, Jan. 7, 1999. |
Ostensen et al., “Characterization and Use of Ultrasound Contrast Agents.” Academy of Radiology, vol. 9, Suppl. 2: S276-S278, 2002. |
Owaki et al., “The Ultrasonic Coagulating and Cutting System Injuries Nerve Function.” Endoscopy, vol. 34, No. 7: 575-579, 2002. |
Pernot, et al., “Temperature Estimation Using Ultrasonic Spatial Compound Imaging”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, (May 2004) 51(5):606-615. |
Pignoli et al., “Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging.” Circulation, vol. 74, No. 6:1399-1406, Dec. 1986. |
Poliachik et al., “Activation, Aggregation and Adhesion of Platelets Exposed to High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 27, No. 11: 1567-1576, 2001. |
Poliachik et al., “Effect of High —Intensity Focused Ultrasound on Whole Blood With or Without Microbubble Contrast Agent.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 25, No. 6: 991-998, 1999. |
Porter et al., “Ultrasound, Microbubbles and Thrombolysis.” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 44, No. 2: 101-110, Oct. 2001. |
Recchia et al., Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization of Blood during Stasis and Thrombosis with a Real-Time Linear-Array Backscatter Imaging System., Coronary Artery Disease, 1993, 4:987-994. |
Rivens et al., “Vascular Occlusion Using Focused Ultrasound Surgery for Use in Fetal Medicine.” European Journal of Ultrasound, vol. 9: 89-97, 1999. |
Rose, Joseph, “Source Influence” Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media, pp. 200-227, Cambridge University Press, 1999, USA. |
Rosen et al., “Vascular Occlusive Diseases.” 37pp., revised 2002. |
Rosenschein et al., “Shock-Wave Thrombus Ablation, A New Method for Noninvasive Mechanical Thrombolysis.” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 70, Issue 15: Abstract, Nov. 15, 1992. |
Rosenschein et al., “Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Nonivasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis-Preclinical Results.” Circulation, vol. 102: 238-245, 2000. (http://www.circulationaha.com.org). |
Sanghvi et al. “High-Intensity Focused Ultrasounds.” Experimental and Investigational Endoscopy. 4(2):383-395 (1994). |
Schlaich, MP. Sympathetic Activation in Chronic Renal Failure. Journal American Society Nephrology 20: 933-939, 2009. |
Schulte-Altedorneburg et al., “Accuracy of In Vivo Carotid B-Mode Ultrasound Compared with Pathological Analysis: Intima-Media Thickening, Lumen Diameter, and Cross-Sectional Area.” Stroke, vol. 32, No. 7: 1520-1524, 2001. |
Sheahan et al., Observing the Bracial Artery through a Pressure Cuff, Physiol. Meas. 14 (1993) 1-6. |
Sherrit et al., The Characterisation and Modelling of Electrostrictive Ceramics for Transducers, Ferroelectrics, 228:(1-4), pp. 167-196, 1999. |
Shrout et al., Classification of Electrostrictive-Based Materials for Transducers, 1993. |
Shung, et al., “Ultrasonic Characterization of Blood During Coagulation”, J. Clin. Ultrasound, (1984) 12:147-153. |
Simon, et al, “Two-Dimensional Temperature Estimation Using Diagnostic Ultrasound”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, (Jul. 1998) 45(4):1088-1099. |
Tachibana et al., “Albumin Microbubble Echo-Contrast Material as an Enhancer for Ultrasound Accelerated Thrombolysis.” Circulation, vol. 92: 1148-1150, 1995. |
Tachibana et al., “The Use of Ultrasound for Drug Delivery.” Echocardiography, vol. 18, No. 4: 323-328, May 2001. |
Tardy et al., “In Vivo Ultrasound Imaging of Thrombi Using a Target-specific Contrast Agent.” Academy of Radiology, vol. 9, Suppl. 2: S294-S296, 2002. |
ter Haar. G. “Ultrasound Focal Beam Surgery.” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 21(9):1089-1100 (1995). |
Vaezy et al., “Hemostasis of Punctured Blood Vessels Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound,” Ultrasound in Med.& Biol., vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 903-910,1998, USA. |
Vaezy et al., “Acoustic surgery.” Physics World: 35-39, Aug. 2001. |
Vaezy et al., “Hemostasis and Tumor Treatment using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Experimental Investigations and Device Development.” First International Workshop on the Application of HIFU in Medicine: 46-49, 2001. |
Vaezy et al., “Hemostasis using high intensity focused ultrasound.” European Journal of Ultrasound, vol. 9: 79-87, 1999. |
Vaezy et al., “Intra-operative acoustic hemostasis of liver: production of a homogenate for effective treatment.” Ultrasonics, vol. 43: 265-269, 2005. |
Vaezy et al., Use of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound to Control Bleeding, Mar. 1999, J Vasc Surg, vol. 29, pp. 533-542. |
Valente, JF et. al. Laparoscopic Renal Denervation for Intractable ADPKD Related Pain. Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation. 2001 16:160. |
Von Land et al., “Development of an Improved Centerline Wall Motion Model.” IEEE: 687-690, 1991. |
Watkin et al., “Multi-Modal Contrast Agents: A First Step.” Academy of Radiology, vol. 9, Suppl. 2: S285-S287, 2002. |
Wickline et al., “Blood Contrast Enhancement with a Novel, Non-Gaseous Nanoparticle Contrast Agent.” Academy of Radiology, vol. 9, Suppl. 2: S290-S293, 2002. |
Williamson et al., “Color Doppler Ultrasound Imaging of the Eye and Orbit.” Survey of Ophthamology, vol. 40, No. 4: 255-267, 1996. |
Yu et al., “A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.” Urological Research, PubMed: Abstract, 2004. |
Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/896,740. |
Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/026,108. |
Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,310. |
Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,533. |
Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,959. |
Takeuchi et al., Dec. 4, 1990, Relaxor ferroelectric transducers, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 697-705. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/896,740. |
Final Office Action dated May 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/026,108. |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,689. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,689. |
Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,418. |
Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/346,466. |
Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/951,850. |
Final Office Action dated May 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,656. |
Office Action dated May 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,144. |
First Action Interview Office Action Summary dated May 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,703. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,655. |
Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,450. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 27, 2011 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/033337. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2011 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/052197. |
Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,775. |
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,763. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2010 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/052193. |
Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/896,740. |
Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,689. |
Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,418. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110118602 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60163466 | Oct 1999 | US | |
60171703 | Dec 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12896740 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13011533 | US | |
Parent | 11619996 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12896740 | US | |
Parent | 10616831 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11619996 | US | |
Parent | 09696076 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10616831 | US |