1. Field
The invention generally relates to generating a transport data stream with picture data, and more particularly to generating transport data streams for use in digital television systems.
2. Description of Related Art
In order to transmit images for digital television (TV), typically the digitally recorded image sequence is transformed in a first processing step which performs, in part, source encoding—in this case, video encoding—into a stream of successive data frames, each of which contains image data of one image.
Currently, video encoding for digital television is defined by the MPEG4-10 (H.264/AVC) encoding and compression standard. In this context, a stream of successive data frames has a cyclically repeating sequence of several data frames, or group of pictures (GOP), that is composed of an I-frame (intra-coded frame) with all image data belonging to one image transmitted at the start of the GOP, several P-frames (predictive coded frames), and/or B-frames (bidirectional coded frames). While a P-frame contains only the altered image data of the appurtenant image relative to the image data of the image belonging to the preceding P-frame or I-frame, the altered image data of the appurtenant image relative to the image data of up to n preceding and up to n following P-frames or I-frames are deposited in the B-frame. Also, in the event of a scene change in the image sequence, an I-frame is used instead of a P-frame that reproduces the scene change better.
These structure characteristics of the GOP used in a stream of successive data frames can be parameterized in the case of the MPEG4-10 (H.264/AVC) encoding standard at the initialization of the transmission system. For the continuous operation of the transmission system, the number of data frames per GOP (i.e., the number of images per GOP) and the number of generated data frames per time unit (i.e., image repetition rate or video frame rate) can be adjusted.
In the next processing step of channel encoding, a data structure of the channel-encoded data stream is generated, starting from the GOP data structure of the stream of successive data frames. The format of the data structure depends on the digital TV transmission standard under which it is implemented and its corresponding encoding algorithm.
In the case of the U.S. digital mobile television standard, the Advanced Television Systems Committee Mobile/Handheld (ATSC-M/H) standard, for example, a stream of ATSC-M/H data frames (or simply ATSC-M/H “frames”) consisting in each case of 5 ATSC-M/H sub data frames (or simply “subframes”) is formed as shown in
WO 2008/092705 A2, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, provides additional background on systems operating under the ATSC Digital Television Standard (A/53) and on providing ATSC interoperability.
As can be seen in the table shown in
Differing pulsing between the image repetition rate in the GOP-structured data frame stream and the fixed transmission rate of ATSC-M/H data frames for an image repetition rate of 30 images/second is shown graphically in
If at any time a new program is selected by the viewer of digital television in which a P-frame is received, an insufficient reconstruction of the image belonging to the P-frame results, which manifests itself as artifacts in the image or in a very noisy picture due to the reduced image information of the P-frame and the lacking image information of the I-frame referenced by the P-frame. A successful source decoding will not result until after the channel decoding of the initially received I-frame. This unpredictable start of a successful source decoding due to the undetermined position of the initially received I-frame and, as a result, disadvantageously delays the entry time into a digital television program when the program is joined or in the event of a program change.
Example embodiments of the present invention generate an image data stream, for digital television, with minimized delays of the entry time into a program or in the event of a program change.
Particularly, methods and devices for generating a transport data stream are provided including generating a data stream of successive second data frames with a GOP structure belonging to the respective program by a source encoder belonging to the respective program that, as P-, B- and/or I-frames, contain the image data of an image of a digitally recorded image sequence of the respective program. On the basis of parameters determined for each first data frame of the data transport stream, such as transmission start and transmission duration, the point in time of the transmission of each second data frame of the data stream belonging to the respective program is determined by the respective source encoder by allocating the respective second data frame to one of the first data frames of the transport data stream. Subsequently, second data frames realized by the respective source encoder as P-frames or B-frames that are to be transmitted in their entirety at the start of first data frames of the respective data stream are replaced by second data frames realized as I-frames. Finally, each first data frame of the transport data stream is packed by a multiplexer with second data frames of data streams each belonging to one program whose time of transmission fits the start of transmission and the length of transmission of the respective first data frame.
In this way it is assured that the second data frame to be transmitted next, at the start of the respective first data frame, is an I-frame and the source encoding of the second data frame realized as I-frame and of the GOP connected therewith may occur in the event of a connection to a program or a program change following the reception and the channel decoding, without delay or at least with a minimized delay.
The transmission of the image data in the transport data stream preferably occurs in accordance with the Advanced Television System Committee-Mobile/Handheld Standard (ATSC-M/H Standard) so that the parameter “length of transmission time” of the first data frame of the transport data stream is established in accordance with this standard.
Since the conversion of a P-frame or a B-frame into an I-frame at the start of the respective first data frame leads to an increase of the data amount to be transmitted in the respective first data frame, the increase in the data volume in a first data frame is at least partially compensated through various embodiments which provide data volume reduction.
In one embodiment, data volume is reduced by providing a conversion of a second data frame realized as P- or B-frame. This is carried out at the start of a first data frame if the interval between the start of the respective first data frame and the next second data frame realized as I-frame located in the respective first data frame is larger than a predetermined first minimal interval. In this case, the acquired gain in minimizing the delayed entry time when a program change occurs, or a connection to a program is made, justifies the increase of the data volume in the respective first data frame caused by the above measure.
In another embodiment concerning data volume reduction, the increase of the data volume in the respective first data frame is compensated by minimizing the data volume in the remaining I-frames of the respective first data frame, e.g, an I-frame at the start of a GOP or an I-frame due to a scene change in the image sequence. The reduction of the data volume may in this context occur by a reduction of the quantification of the individual image elements of the image transmitted in the respective I-frame, such as the number of bits or bytes for the description of color and/or brightness of the image element. A reduction of the data amount in the remaining I-frames of the respective first data frame is carried out only if the interval from the start of the respective first data frame to the respective I-frame is greater than a predetermined second minimal interval. In this case, the GOP belonging to the respective I-frame is shortened in such way that the lower picture quality of the full picture reconstructed from an I-frame with a minimized data volume and of the full images reconstructed from the subsequent P-frames causes only an insignificant loss of quality in the image sequence for the viewer.
In yet another embodiment which provides data volume reduction, the increase in the data volume in the respective first data frame is compensated by an extension of the duration of a GOP. In this way, the number of I-frames per time unit is reduced and thus also the larger data volume connected with each I-frame relative to the lower data volume of the P-frames per time unit. Since the structural parameters of a GOP relative to the running time of the transmission system can not be changed, they must be set at the time of initialization of the transmission system.
In order to communicate to the multiplexer a respective first data frame of the transport data stream into which the individual second data frame of the data stream belonging to the respective program is to be packed, a source encoder transmits to the multiplexer the transmission times of the second data frames to be transmitted in the respective first data frame of the transport data stream in the individual transmission antennas of the transmission system. This is realized in a single frequency network, at the “air interface”, as a reference mark that is deposited in the first data packet of the second data frame of the respective data stream to be transmitted at the start of the respective first data frame.
In an embodiment, the reference mark is executed as a time stamp with a transmission time of a coordinated universal time (Universal Time Coordinated (UTC)). In another embodiment, the transmission time is indicated as a time interval relative to the initialization time (01/01/1980) or any other chosen reference time within the coordinated universal time.
In another embodiment, the determination of the start of the transmission and the transmission length of each first data frame of the transport data stream is determined by the single source encoder.
To this end, each source encoder receives a reference time from a reference timer allocated to it that is synchronized with the reference time of a reference timer allocated to the multiplexer. This results in an identical chronological referencing between the determination of the transmission start and the transmission length of each first data frame of the transport data stream in each source encoder and the setting of the corresponding parameters in the multiplexer.
Alternatively, each source encoder receives the reference time from a reference timer allocated to the multiplexer via the multiplexer.
The determination of the start of the transmission and the transmission length of each first data frame of the transport data stream can also be determined by the multiplexer and transferred to each source encoder.
Only complete second data frames are packed in a first data frame of the data stream. Second data frames that each extend across two successive first data frames are in each case transferred as entire second data frames either in the preceding first data frame or in the subsequent second data frame. The second data frame is allocated to the two first data frames on which the larger share of the image data transmitted in the second frame chronologically falls. Such an allocation of a complete second data frame to one of the two successive first data frames is made possible by providing an additional transmission capacity reserve. In the event a program is being joined or a program change occurs, this avoids the fraction of a second data frame transmitted at the start of a first data frame from being rejected due to the absence of the corresponding other fraction of the second data frame and, in the event of an I-frame transmitted only fractionally, the source encoding can not be started until the reception of the next I-frame in the same or in the following first data frame.
The second data frames of the respective data stream jointly packed into a first data frame of the transport data stream are completed and transmitted to the multiplexer by the respective source encoder. Particularly, at a generating time that precedes the transmission time of the second data frame to be transmitted at the start of the respective first data frame by the transmission time between the respective source encoder and the multiplexer.
In one embodiment, the point in time of the second data frames of the data stream belonging to the respective program that are to be packed in a specific first data frame of the transport data stream is determined by the source encoder.
In another embodiment, the point in time of the second data frames of the data stream belonging to the respective program that are to be packed in a specific first data frame of the transport data stream is determined by the multiplexer and transmitted to the respective source encoder.
The features and advantages of the example embodiments of the invention presented herein will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings.
Example embodiments of processes and devices for generating a transport data stream for digital TV will now be described with reference to
In step S10, a picture sequence s1, s2, . . . , sn is recorded for each program 1, 2, . . . , n including individual digital images having a specific image repetition frequency. In step S20, a data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn with successive source-encoded second data frames is generated from an image sequence associated with a respective program by a respective source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n shown in
The individual second data frames that are source-encoded as I-, P- or B-frames of the data streams d1, d2, . . . , dn and associated to a program 1, 2, . . . n are packed in one of the subsequent process steps in the successive first data frames of a single data stream dTR by a multiplexer 2 and channel-encoded in a downstream channel encoder 6 as shown in
For an alignment of these parameters, in an embodiment a virtual GOP structure is generated in each case in the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn by the respective source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n whose parameters, e.g., transmission start and transmission length, are in agreement with the corresponding parameters of the first data frames of the common transport data stream dTR, each of which contains one virtual GOP. To this end, such parameters of the individual successive channel-encoded first data frames of the common transport data stream dTR and thus of the appurtenant successive virtual GOPs are determined in process step S30.
In the case of a transmission of digital television signal in accordance with the ATSC-M/H digital mobile television standard, the length of an ATSC-M/H data frame packed by a multiplexer 2 and channel-encoded by a channel encoder 6 amounts to 967.88 ms according to the table in
In order to bring the GOP structure of the individual data streams d1, d2, . . . , dn in relation to the virtual GOP structure, the transmission intervals of the individual second data frames of the individual data streams d1, d2, . . . , dn belonging in each case to one program must be determined in relation to the transmission start and the transmission length of the individual first data frames of the common transport data stream dTR.
To this end, in an embodiment of the device according to the present invention, each source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n is allocated one reference timer 51, 52, . . . , 5n, and generates a transport data stream for digital television as shown in
Another embodiment of the device for generating an image data stream for digital television is shown in
The allocation of each second data frame of the data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn generated by the respective source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n to a virtual GOP and thus to one of the first data frames of the common transport data stream dTR can be done by using the parameters transmission start and transmission length of each virtual GOP.
In the case of a second data frame extending across two successive ATSC-M/H data frames, as shown in
Referring again to
In step S50, the increase in the data volume within each virtual GOP of the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn, and thus within a first data frame of the transport data stream dTR caused by the conversion of a second data frame realized as P-frame or as B-frame into a second data frame realized as I-frame at the start of the respective virtual GOP, is at least partially compensated by data volume reduction within the respective virtual GOP or, respectively, within a first data frame of the transport data stream dTR. Techniques for providing such data volume reduction will now be described in more detail.
The reduction of the image data volume per pixel of a second data frame not positioned at the start of a virtual GOP and realized as an I-frame by reducing the quantification of the image data volume is carried out only if the chronological distance between the second data frame positioned at the start of a virtual GOP and realized as I-frame and the respective second data frame not positioned at the start of a virtual GOP and realized as I-frame is greater than a predetermined second minimal time interval. In this way it is assured that a data volume reduction in a second data frame not positioned at the start of a virtual GOP and realized as I-frame is carried out only if this second data frame realized as I-frame is positioned closer to the end than to the start of the respective virtual GOP and therefore a data volume reduction is not crucial for the quality of the transmission of image data.
In step S60, the transmission point in time (i.e. the transmission start of the respective second data frame in a transmission antenna 4 of the transmission system realized as single frequency network) is determined via the allocation to a specific ATSC-M/H data frame determined in step S30 for each second data frame of the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn and deposited as reference mark in the first data packet of the second data frame positioned at the start of the respective GOP.
Finally, the individual data packets or, respectively, second data frames allocated to the individual GOPs of the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn are completed by the respective source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n and transferred to the multiplexer 2 at their respective generation point in time which results from the point in time of transmission of the second data frame of the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn to be transmitted at the start of the respective virtual GOP less the transmission time between the source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n and the multiplexer 2.
The point in time of the generation of the second data frames of the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn to be packed into one common first data frame of the common transport data stream dTR is determined by the appurtenant source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n.
Instead of using the reference time, the transmission start of each individual ATSC-M/H data frame functioning as first data frame (i.e., ATSC-M/H data frame cycle) or the point in time of generation for the second data frames of the respective data stream d1, d2, . . . , dn to be packed into each individual ATSC-M/H data frame functioning as first data frame (i.e., generation cycle) can be transmitted to each individual source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n by the multiplexer 2 via the cycle line T.
In this manner, the respective source encoder 11, 12, . . . , 1n determines the transmission point in time of each second data frame in the respective first frame of the common transport data stream dTR directly on the basis of one of these two cycles (i.e., ATSC-M/H data frame cycle or generation cycle).
As soon as all the second data frames of the individual data streams d1, d2, . . . , dn that have been packed into a common first data frame of the common transport data stream dTR are present in the buffer, the respective first data frame realized as ATSC-M/H data frame is generated in the next process step by allocating the second data frames belonging in each case to the individual programs to the respective ATSC-M/H data frame and channel-encoding them in a channel encoder 6 downstream of the multiplexer 2, for example a Reed Solomon encoding algorithm. In turn, the channel-encoded data portions are packed into one or several time slots allocated to the respective program within the respective ATSC-M/H data frame.
In step S120, a first data frame of the common transport data stream dTR realized in that fashion as an ATSC-M/H data frame is transferred to the exciter (i.e., transmission unit) 3 at the respective transmission point in time.
In exciter 3, the first data frame of the common transport data stream dTR, realized as ATSC-M/H data frame and received in each case, is modulated in step S130 to a high-frequency carrier and amplified to the required transmission level.
Finally, the respective first data frame of the common transport data stream dTR modulated on a high-frequency carrier and realized as an ATSC-M/H data frame is broadcasted in step S140 through a transmission antenna 4. Particularly, at the broadcasting point in time that results from the respective transmission point in time plus the time of transmission between the channel encoder 6 and the transmission antenna 4—so-called transmitter antenna delay (TAD time).
The invention is not limited to the embodiments, variants and subvariants, of the method and the device in accordance with the invention for the generation of a transport data stream for digital television. In addition to the ATSC-M/H standard, for example, other existing and future transmission standards of digital television and other picture transmission methods, for example via satellite, the Internet or any other transmission route, are covered in particular by the invention.
The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, in a computer program product or software, hardware or any combination thereof, without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present invention.
Software embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a computer program product, or software, that may include an article of manufacture on a machine accessible or machine readable medium having instructions. The instructions on the machine accessible or machine readable medium may be used to program a computer system or other electronic device. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing or transmitting electronic instructions. The techniques described herein are not limited to any particular software configuration. They may find applicability in any computing or processing environment. The terms “machine accessible medium” or “machine readable medium” used herein shall include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or transmitting a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methods described herein. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, process, application, module, unit, logic, and so on) as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of stating that the execution of the software by a processing system causes the processor to perform an action to produce a result.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention should not be limited by any of the above described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
In addition, it should be understood that the figures illustrated in the attachments, which highlight the functionality and advantages of the present invention, are presented for example purposes only. The architecture of the present invention is sufficiently flexible and configurable, such that it may be utilized (and navigated) in ways other than that shown in the accompanying figures.
Further, the purpose of the foregoing Abstract is to enable the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the public generally, and especially the scientists, engineers and practitioners in the art who are not familiar with patent or legal terms or phraseology, to determine quickly from a cursory inspection the nature and essence of the technical disclosure of the application. The Abstract is not intended to be limiting as to the scope of the present invention in any way. It is also to be understood that the steps and processes recited in the claims need not be performed in the order presented.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2008 050 222 | Oct 2008 | DE | national |
| 10 2008 054 305 | Nov 2008 | DE | national |
| 10 2008 059 028 | Nov 2008 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5216503 | Paik et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5506844 | Rao | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5614914 | Bolgiano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5835493 | Magee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5903574 | Lyons | May 1999 | A |
| 5966120 | Arazi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6005605 | Kostreski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6088337 | Eastmond et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6118797 | O'Shea | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6130898 | Kostreski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6192070 | Poon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6269092 | Schilling | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6313885 | Patel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324186 | Mahn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6335766 | Twitchell et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6414720 | Tsukidate et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6477180 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480236 | Limberg | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6496477 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6507618 | Wee et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6631491 | Shibutani et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6640239 | Gidwani | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6721337 | Kroeger et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6727847 | Rabinowitz et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6728467 | Oshima | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6744789 | Michener | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6772434 | Godwin | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6801499 | Anandakumar et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6804223 | Hoffmann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6816204 | Limberg | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6861964 | Breti et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6862707 | Shin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6879720 | Sarachik et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6930983 | Perkins et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6996133 | Bretl et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7110048 | Weiss | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7111221 | Birru et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7197685 | Limberg | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7310354 | Fimoff et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7324545 | Chuah et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7336646 | Muller | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7349675 | Karr et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7382838 | Peting | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7496094 | Gopinath et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7532677 | Simon | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7532857 | Simon | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7539247 | Choi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7551675 | Kroeger | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7554912 | Rodriguez-Sanchez et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7558279 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7564905 | Park et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7593474 | Jeong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7599348 | Kang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7667780 | Weiss | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7702337 | Vare et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7715491 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7733819 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7779327 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7783316 | Mitchell | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7801181 | Song et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7804909 | Choi et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7822134 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7830974 | Choi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7852961 | Chang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7856590 | Kim et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7933351 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8009662 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 20010017849 | Campanella et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020085548 | Ku et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020170060 | Lyman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030053493 | Graham Mobley et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099303 | Birru et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100267 | Itoh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030206596 | Carver et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20050013249 | Kong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044475 | Yedidia et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046600 | Bretl et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074074 | Limberg | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050084023 | Bott et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147186 | Funamoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207416 | Rajkotia | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238100 | Hsiao et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249300 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249301 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002464 | Choi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050770 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060126556 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200852 | Simon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200853 | Simon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211436 | Paila et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244865 | Simon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060245516 | Simon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070066272 | Vassiliou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074267 | Clerget et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091857 | Elstermann | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143810 | Yousef | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174880 | Fite et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189410 | Zeng | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070230460 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080056219 | Venkatachalam | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175148 | Todd et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181112 | Beck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205215 | Kikuchi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209464 | Wright-Riley | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211969 | Simon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080247442 | Orlik et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254739 | Kidd et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259835 | Venkatachalam et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273698 | Manders et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003432 | Liu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090013356 | Doerr et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090016435 | Brandsma et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090034442 | Song et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090040962 | Oger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100459 | Riedl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175355 | Gordon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090201997 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228764 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228765 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090252266 | Heinemann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265751 | Limberg | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293086 | Lutterbach et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023972 | Summers et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100254449 | Rusch-Ihwe | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110170015 | Kim et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230202 | Wood et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 199 60 295 | Jun 2001 | DE |
| 196 17 293 | Nov 2001 | DE |
| 101 12 773 | Sep 2002 | DE |
| 10 2006 015 393 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 10 2007 012 465 | May 2008 | DE |
| 0 837 609 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0 926 894 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 1 079 631 | Feb 2001 | EP |
| 1 670 150 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1 753 249 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 1 950 962 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 1 965 386 | Sep 2008 | EP |
| 1 965 389 | Sep 2008 | EP |
| 2 399 719 | Sep 2004 | GB |
| WO-0203728 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO-03009590 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-03045064 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2004062183 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004062283 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO-2007114653 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2006046107 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006066617 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006084361 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007046672 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008042694 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008100000 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2008117981 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009016175 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010000407 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| ATSC Digital Television Standard (A/53) Revision E, Advanced Television Systems Committee, Dec. 27, 2005. |
| ATSC Recommended Practice: Design of Synchronized Multiple Transmitter Networks (A/111), Advanced Television Systems Committee, Sep. 3, 2004. |
| ATSC Standard: Synchronization Standard for Distributed Transmission (A/110), Advanced Television Systems Committee, Jul. 14, 2004. |
| ATSC Standard: Synchronization Standard for Distributed Transmission, Revision A (A/110A), Advanced Television Systems Committee, Jul. 19, 2005. |
| ATSC Standard: Synchronization Standard for Distributed Transmission, Revision B (A/110B), Advanced Television Systems Committee, Dec. 24, 2007. |
| ATSC Technology Group Report: DTV Signal Reception and Processing Considerations, Doc. T3-600r4, Advanced Television Systems Committee, Sep. 18, 2003. |
| Battisa, “Spectrally Efficient High Data Rate Waveforms for The UFO SATCOM Channel”, Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 98, Proceedings, Oct. 18-21, 1998, pp. 134-139, IEEE vol. 1. |
| Citta, R., et al., “ATSC Transmission System: VSB Tutorial”, Zenith Electronics Corporation, Symposium Handout, Montreuz Symposium, Jun. 12, 1997. |
| “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); DVB Mega-Frame for Single Frequency Network (SFN) Synchronization”, European Broadcasting Union; eTSI TS 101 191 v1.4.1, Jun. 2004. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2006/007265, Oct. 4, 2007. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/EP2008/000837, Aug. 6, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2006/020599, Nov. 30, 2007. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2006/022300, Dec. 27, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/EP2008/000837, Aug. 12, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2006/007251, May 20, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2006/007265, Sep. 4, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2006/015317, May 14, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2006/020599, Aug. 31, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2006/022300, Mar. 29, 2007. |
| Lecture 4: Digital Television the DVB transport stream, obtained from http://www.abo.fi/˜jbjorkqv/digitv/lect4.pdf (last visited May 4, 2006). |
| Lee, Y., et al., “ATSC Terrestrial Digital Television Broadcasting Using Single Frequency Networks”, ETRI Journal, Apr. 2004, pp. 92-100, vol. 26, No. 2. |
| Owen, H., “Proposed Modifications to ATSC Digital Television Standard to Improve Performance in the Face of Dynamic Multipath for Both Fixed and Mobile Operation”, Sarnoff Corporation, Apr. 2, 2001, Princeton, New Jersey. |
| Patel, C. B., et al., “Proposal to ATSC Subcommittee T3/59 to Provide 8-VSB With a Repetitive-PN1023 Signal for Rapidly and Reliably Initializing Tracking in an Adaptive Equalizer Despite Adverse Multipath Conditions”, Apr. 12, 2001. |
| Proposal for Enhancement of ATSC RF Transmission System (Revision to A/53), submitted by Samsung, Draft ver. 1.0, Sep. 16, 2004. |
| Raghunandan, K., “Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service (SDARS) System Architecture and Receiver Review”, IEEE, Oct. 27, 2005. |
| Vogel, W. J., et al., “Propagation Effects and Satellite Radio Design”, Paper No. 1445, Maastricht Exhibition and Congress Centre (MECC), Aug. 17-24, 2002, Maastricht, the Netherlands. |
| Wang, “A New Implementation of Single Frequency Network Based on DMB-T”, 2004 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (2004 ICCCAS), Jun. 27-29, 2004, pp. 246-249, vol. 1. |
| Wang, X., et al., “Transmitter Identification in Distributed Transmission Network and Its Applications in Position Location and a New Data Transmission Scheme”, NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference, Apr. 16-21, 2005, pp. 511-520, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
| Whitaker, J. C., “Standard Handbook of Video and Television Engineering”, Chapter 17.2 “ATSC DTV Received Systems”, 2000, pp. 17-63 to 17-99. |
| “Universal Mobile Telecommunication Systems (UMTS); Introduction of the Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS) in the Radio Access Network (Ran); Stage 2” (3GPP TS 25.346 version 7.4.0 Release 7); ETSI TS 125 346 No. V7.4.0 (Jun. 2007), IEEE, Lis, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, vol. 3-R2, No. V7.4.0, Jun. 1, 2007. |
| ATSC Digital Television Standard (A/53), “Annex D: RF/Transmission Systems Characteristics”, Sep. 16, 1995, pp. 46-60. |
| “European Broadcasting Union Union Europeenne de Radio-Television Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Specification for Service Information (SI) in DVB systems; ETS 300 468”, ETSI Standards, Lis, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, vol. BC, Second Edition, Jan. 1, 1997, pp. 1-72. |
| Lee et al., “ATSC Terrestrial Digital Television Broadcasting Using Single Frequency Networks”, XP-002556814, ETRI Journal, vol. 26, No. 2, Apr. 2004, pp. 92-100. |
| “ATSC Digital Television Standard (Annex D), RF/Transmission Systems Characteristics”, Advanced Television Systems Committee, Sep. 16, 1995, pp. 46-60. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100085489 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |