Patent Grant
11481030
The accompanying drawings illustrate a number of exemplary embodiments and are a part of the specification. Together with the following description, these drawings demonstrate and explain various principles of the present disclosure.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference characters and descriptions indicate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements. While the exemplary embodiments described herein are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail herein. However, the exemplary embodiments described herein are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the present disclosure covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Examples of the present disclosure are directed to detection of signals from a user and control of an artificial reality device based on the detected signals. As is explained in greater detail below, embodiments of the present disclosure may include systems having a head-mounted device configured to present an artificial reality view to a user and a control device including a plurality of electromyography (EMG) sensors. One or more processors, that may be located in any system component, may be programmed to detect EMG signals corresponding to user gestures associated with the EMG data received from the sensors and to classify the EMG signals to identify gesture types. The control signal may trigger the head-mounted device to modify the artificial reality view, for example, based on the gesture type(s).
Accurate control of objects (real or virtual) within an artificial reality environment may be useful to maintain an immersive experience. Gestures may be a useful way of controlling objects and need not require interaction with any real physical object. For example, actions such as pressing the key of a keyboard, turning a dial, pressing a button, selecting an item from a menu (among many other actions) may be simulated by a user gesture. A tapping gesture may simulate a key press. Furthermore, identification of which body part (e.g., which finger) has been used to perform a gesture allows further control of an artificial reality environment.
Features from any of the embodiments described herein may be used in combination with one another in accordance with the general principles described herein. These and other embodiments, features, and advantages will be more fully understood upon reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims.
The following provides, with reference to
This disclosure is directed to event detector models that may be used to detect user gestures. Such detector models may involve recording a series of EMG signals (datasets) while one or more users perform different gestures. In some examples, example gestures may include finger taps (e.g., simulated keypresses), but other types of gestures may analogously be used to implement example event detector models.
Gestures may include discrete events that span a finite period of time and may be characterized, in some embodiments, by one or more electromyography signals (including electromyography wavelets) representing muscle activations. Configuring systems to detect and classify such gestures using machine learning techniques may involve a significant amount of labeled training samples. Hence, systems that may rapidly learn gestures from few samples and capture and interpret meaningful features from human gestures in an unsupervised or self-supervised way are highly desirable. Examples described herein provide such unsupervised and/or self-supervised models.
The dataset may include EMG signals corresponding to index and middle finger taps. The dataset may be divided into a training set including 50 consecutive finger taps for each finger, recorded at approximately 2 Hz, and a test set including 20 consecutive finger taps for each finger, recorded at approximately 2 Hz. The above datasets may represent less than 2 minutes of recorded data. Any other suitable data sets may also be used as a training set.
A covariance mapped to the tangent space may be selected as a feature. A short time window (30 ms) and a stride of 5 samples, corresponding to a data rate of 400 Hz, may be used for the feature extraction. The dimensionality of the feature space may be reduced to find events in the dataset through the application of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on 5 components. Thereafter, the data may be centered (e.g., by removing the median) and finally, the local maximum (peak) may be identified on the first component.
Data around each event may be sliced in epochs in preparation for the cluster analysis. In one example, a window of 150 ms may be centered around each event to slice the data, and any other suitable window size may be used in a similar manner. Thereafter, each of the epochs may be vectorized and subjected to a K-Means clustering process to extract the three clusters. For visualization purposes, a dimensionality reduction process based on Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) may be applied to plot the clusters shown in
In some examples, timing adjustments may be performed on the registered events. The timing of each event may be associated with the local maxima on the first component identified using the execution of a PCA analysis. The ground truth may then be generated from the acquired samples to train an event detection model.
In some examples, jitter and misalignments may be reduced or eliminated by finding an optimal offset for each epoch by analyzing the autocorrelation between the epoch and the average across all the event. Accordingly, different offsets (−10 to 10 samples) may be tested, and the timing that maximizes the correlation may then be selected. The testing process may be executed iteratively until all epochs are properly aligned.
A binary time series may be labeled with a value of one when an event is detected (the event occurred) and a zero when the event is not detected (e.g., the event may not have occurred). A model to predict such a time series may be trained based on the labeled samples. The output of the model then may be compared against a predetermined energy threshold and debounced to configure the event detector.
Exemplary parameters may be configured for the model's ground truth. After re-synchronization, the events may be centered around the peak of the first PCA component. The model may rely on the full event time course, and the model may predict the event once a user finished its execution. Accordingly, the labels may be shifted or offset based on the event timing. This parameter may be referred to as “offset.”
In some examples, the model may not perfectly predict the right single time sample corresponding to an event. Accordingly, the model may be configured to predict a value, such as 1, on several consecutive time samples surrounding the center of the event. This parameter may be referred to as a “pulse width.”
In some examples, the offset may be set at 75 ms after the event peak (approximately 30 samples after the event's peak) and the pulse width may be set as 25 ms. These examples, and other examples, are non-limiting, and other parameter values may be used depending of particularities of the signals used during the training of the event detector model.
The model may be trained to predict the labels used. The model may be applied on a test set, and the inferenced outputs may be compared to a predetermined threshold and debounced to elicit the identification of discrete events.
In some examples, events may be classified from snapshots taken from the EMG signals. Snapshots taken around the time events may be detected or registered by the event detector. The event classifier model may be trained to distinguish between different types or classes of events. Such a classification is possible in part because each event is associated with a class or type of event corresponding to a characteristic or stereotypical signal associated with specific muscle activations synchronized with the occurrence of the event. Eighteen datasets may be used, and each dataset may be gathered from a different user. The datasets include recordings of EMG signals capture from key down, key up, and tap events. The total number of events used per user may be approximately 160 (80 for each finger index and middle).
The covariance may be estimated using a 40 ms time window and a stride of 2.5 ms, resulting from a feature sampling frequency of 400 Hz. The covariances may be then projected in the tangent space, and the dimension may be reduced by selecting the diagonal and two adjacent channels (represented in the matrix by the values located above and below the diagonal). A feature space of a dimension size of 48 is produced by the application of the above operations.
A window of signal ranging from −100 ms to +125 ms around each key press event may be extracted (e.g., sliced and buffered). Such windows may include approximately 90 EMG sample values. At the end of the aforementioned operations, a dataset of size 160×90×48 (N_events×N_time_samples×N_features) may be obtained for each user.
In the event models shown in
Several classification models may be used to implement single user event classification models. In some examples, each trial may be vectorized into a large vector (with dimensions corresponding to number of times points×features). Once such large vectors are generated, a classifier may be produced based on logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron, and may be implemented in a gesture classification model.
In some examples, the dimensionality of the data (on the feature dimension) may be reduced by applying a spatial filter then, vectorizing the result and using a classifier. Examples of spatial filters may be based, for example, on extraction of Common Spatial Patterns (CSP), or xDawn enhancement of evoked potentials in ensemble with a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). Through the application of CSP, a subspace that maximizes the difference in variance of the sources may be determined. In an xDawn approach, spatial filters may be estimated from class averages rather than raw data (which may increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)).
In some examples, a model may be developed by a method including one or more of the following approaches: concatenating an event model of each class (e.g., middle finger keypress and index finger key press) to each trial; estimating the covariance matrix; tangent space mapping, and applying LDA. Such approaches may produce a compact representation of the signal, and may be effective with low SNR.
A stratified random split with 90% training and 10% test may be used in part to conserve class balance. A random split may also be used. A 99% accuracy in average across users may be achieved using the linear regression classifier, with 95% for the worst user.
Training set size may be modified. The size of the training set may be changed in the split, from 5% to 90%. The amount of test data may remain fixed at 10%. Two classifiers may be used, LR and XDCov+LDA. Ten stratified random splits with 10% test and variable train size may be used for cross validation.
A plateau of accuracy may be reached at around 80 events. Twenty events may be used to achieve an accuracy of 95% with a classifier based on logistic regression. The classifier based on XDCov+LDA may take a greater number of events to converge.
Window size may also be adjusted. The size of the window used to classify the event may impact the latency of the event detection. Accordingly, the model's performance may vary depending on the window size parameter, which may be adjusted accordingly.
In some implementations, a single time point for the classification may be used to uncover which time point contains information. Alternatively, an increasing window size (containing all past time points), from, for example, −100 ms to +125 ms after the keypress event may be used. For each time point or window size, a user specific model may be trained, and the performance of the resulting classifier(s) or mode(s) may then be evaluated. A logistic regression model or other suitable model, as discussed above, may be used to implement a classifier. Cross validation may be achieved using 10 stratified random splits with 10% reserved for testing purposes and 90% used for of training purposes. These numerical values, and other values discussed herein, are exemplary and not limiting.
A generalization across time may be used to determine how independent time samples. As part of the generalization across time, a classifier may be trained at a single time point, and then the classifier may be tested at another time point. This approach may determine if the different processes involved in the event are stationary. If the same combination of source is similarly active across two different time points, then it may be implied that the single user model may be transferred or used to classify events produced by other users.
A classifier based on logistic regression may be trained for each user and each time point. The accuracy of each classifier may then be evaluated for every other time point (for the same user). The accuracy across all users may then be averaged, as well as the structure of the accuracy matrix.
In some examples, generalized cross-user classification models may be used. A classifier may be trained with the data collected from several users, and the trained classifier obtained may be tested for its performance on a test user. As discussed above, several types of classifiers may be implemented to determine an optimal type of classifier. Data extracted from one user may be left out for cross validation purposes. On average, the accuracy achieved across the implemented models may be around 82%. A large variance across users may also be observed.
In some examples, model transfer across pairs of users may be used. A classifier model may be trained based on data extracted from one user, and then the accuracy of the model may then be evaluated in relation to the data for every other user. The classifier model may be based on logistic regression.
In some examples, user adaptation may also be used. Based on the investigation of single user event classification models, even classes derived from a single user may be separated, and a relatively small amount of labeled training data may be used to obtain a reasonably accurate single user event classification model.
From the generalized cross-user classification model results, it may be inferred that some user specific classification models transfer adequately to other users. Based on these initial results, the following examples follow. In some examples, models from other (different) users may be used get a good estimate of labels for a present user. Also, using this estimation of labels, a user specific model may be trained to obtain a performance close to that of a single user model trained with labeled data.
User embedding may also be used. An embedding space where the two event classes may be clustered may be generated. The user transfer matrix suggests that, for each test user, there are generally some (e.g., two) single user models that may adequately transfer. A user embedding space including the outputs of a collection of single user models may be constructed. Specifically, a simple nearest-centroid classifier over a covariance feature (XDCov+MDM) may be built. The advantage of the XDCov+MDM approach with respect to linear regression or other alternative probabilistic models is that an event may still contribute to cluster separability even if the model may be calibrated inappropriately.
The output of the XDCov+MDM model may be a function of the softmax applied over the distance to the centroid of each event class. In some examples (e.g., binary classifications), one dimension may be used for each user specific mode. The number of dimensions, however, may be extended depending on the classification type, such as a classification that may be made from a pool of more than two possible classes, for example, greater than a binary classification.
The embedding associated with a user may be trained with samples derived from all the users, minus one user, from a group of users. Thereafter, the samples associated with the user not used in the training of the embedding may be projected into the trained embedding. Thus, a space of X−1 dimensions may be produced, where X is the number of users from the group of users.
After producing the embedding as discuss above, a clustering process may be executed to separate the clusters corresponding to the different types of event classes (such as index finger tap and middle finger tap or pinches or snaps or other gesture types to be separated). For example, a K-means process may be run on the set of data points produced using the embedding.
A self-supervised user model may also be developed. After a set of labels may be produced using, for example, the clustering technique, such labels may be used to train a user specific model from the original dataset. An XDCov and a linear displacement analysis, or other suitable classification model may be implemented, for example, if it is known that the chosen classification model does not overfit the model substantially and may be insensitive to noise included in the labeled data.
An accuracy of 98% may be achieved using the full training set, which may include the data points of all the users from the group of users.
The window size may be adjusted to improve the performance of the self-supervised model. Observing the accuracy of the self-supervised model as the window size increases may be used to determine an optimal window size. Data from one user may be omitted for cross validation of the model. For the clustering and user specific model, a 10 fold random split with 10% of test data and 90% training data may be used. In this case, it may be determined that the self-supervised model performed better with a full window size. This may be explained by the observation that, in this instance, a small window size did not produce a separable cluster. Accordingly, a large window size may be used to obtain labeled data, then a user specific model may be trained using a relatively small window size, for example, using the labels.
A similar approach may be used to study data size effects. An ensemble of single user models may be used to evaluate performance. Cross validation may include leaving one user out for the alignment, then using the same 10 fold random split with 10% of test data and an increasing training size from 5 to 90%. The ensemble approach may reach an accuracy of 96% after 30 events, and then the accuracy may plateau after that for larger numbers of events.
Supervised domain adaptation may use a Canonical Partial Least Square (CPLS) model. In some examples, a method based on domain adaptation may be used instead of building a user specific model, for example, by determining a data transformation that may result in adequate transfer across users. A CPLS model may be used to perform the domain adaptation. A transformation function may be determined to align models of each event class (e.g., different gesture types such as index finger tap, middle finger tap, index finger to thumb pinch, middle finger to thumb pinch, finger snap, etc.) for one user with models for each event class of another user.
Data distribution after alignment may be studied by considering the UMAP embedding of the data before and after transformation.
The transformation process for each pair of users from the group of users may be studied. The user-to-user transfer matrix may be reproduced after performing the alignment. A single user model may be trained, and then for each test user, the data may be aligned, and the accuracy of the model may be tested on the transformed data. Cross validation may include, for a test user, estimating the event class model on the first 40 events (or other number of events), then performing domain adaptation, and finally testing the accuracy of the model on the remaining events (e.g., 120 events). Numerical values used in these (and other) examples are exemplary and not limiting.
The amount of data needed to reach optimal adaptation may be determined. Performance evaluation may be made using an ensemble of a single user model, in part because it may be possible to adapt data between pairs of users. Cross validation may include leaving one user out of the alignment, and thereafter using a 10 fold random split with 10% of test data and increasing the training size from 5 to 90%. Numerical values are exemplary and not limiting.
In some embodiments, the output of one or more of the sensing components may be optionally processed using a hardware-based signal processing circuit (e.g., to perform amplification, filtering, rectification, and/or another suitable signal processing function). In some embodiments, at least some signal processing of the output of the sensing components may be performed in software. Thus, signal processing of signals sampled by the sensors may be performed in hardware, software, or by any suitable combination of hardware and software, as aspects of the technology described herein are not limited in this respect. A non-limiting example of an analog circuit used to process signal data from sensors 2610 is discussed in more detail below, with reference to
In some examples, the dongle may be inserted into a separate computer device, that may be located within the same environment as the user, but not carried by the user. This separate computer may receive control signals from the control device and further process these signals to provide a further control signal to the head-mounted device. The control signals may trigger the head-mounted device to modify the artificial reality view. In some examples, the dongle (or equivalent circuit in a head-mounted device or other device) may be network enabled, allowing communication with a remote computer through the network, and the remote computer may provide control signals to the head-mounted device, to trigger the head-mounted device to modify the artificial reality view. In some examples, a dongle may be inserted into a head-mounted device to provide improved communications functionality, and the head-mounted device may perform further processing (e.g., modification of the AR image) based on the control signal received from the control device 2710.
In some examples, the configuration of the dongle portion may be included in a head-mounted device, such as an artificial reality headset. In some examples, the circuit described above in
A head-mounted device may include an antenna similar to antenna 2752 described above in relation to
An example device may include a control device and one or more devices (such as one or more dongle portions, headsets, remote computer devices, and the like) in communication with the control device (e.g., via BLUETOOTH or another suitable short-range wireless communication technology). The control device may include one or more sensors, which may include electrical sensors including one or more electrodes. The electrical outputs from the electrodes, which may be referred to as sensor signals, may be provided to an analog circuit configured to perform analog processing (e.g., filtering, etc.) of the sensor signals. The processed sensor signals may then be provided to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC), which may be configured to convert analog signals to digital signals that may be processed by one or more computer processors. Example computer processors may include one or more microcontrollers (MCU), such as the nRF52840 (manufactured by NORDIC SEMICONDUCOTR). The MCU may also receive inputs from one or more other sensors. The device may include one or more other sensors, such as an orientation sensor, which may be an absolute orientation sensor and may include an inertial measurement unit. An example orientation sensor may include a BN0055 inertial measurement unit (manufactured by BOSCH SENSORTEC). The device may also include a dedicated power supply, such as a power and battery module. The output of the processing performed by MCU may be provided to an antenna for transmission to the dongle portion or another device. Other sensors may include mechanomyography (MMG) sensors, sonomyography (SMG) sensors, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) sensors, and other suitable type of sensors.
A dongle portion, or other device such as a head-mounted device, may include one or more antennas configured to communicate with the control device and/or other devices. Communication between system components may use any suitable wireless protocol, such as radio-frequency signaling and BLUETOOTH. Signals received by the antenna of the dongle portion (or other device) may be provided to a computer through an output, such as a USB output, for further processing, display, and/or for effecting control of a particular physical or virtual object or objects.
Although the examples provided with reference to
In some examples, the control glove 2830 (that may be more simply referred to as a glove) may include one or more magnetic tracker receivers. For example, a finger of the glove may include at least one receiver coil, and detection of a tracker signal from the at least one receiver coil induced by a magnetic tracker transmitter may be used to determine the position and/or orientation of at least portion of the finger. One or more receiver coils may be associated with each portion of a hand, such as a finger (such as the thumb), palm, and the like. The glove may also include other sensors providing sensor signals indicative of the position and/or configuration of the hand, such as electroactive sensors. Sensor signals, such as magnetic tracker receiver signals, may be transmitted to a control device, such as a wearable control device. In some examples, a control device (such as a wrist-mounted control device) may be in communication with a control glove, and receive sensor data from the control glove using wired and/or wireless communication. For example, a flexible electrical connector may extend between a control device (e.g., a wrist-mounted control device) and the glove. In some examples, the control device may include a glove, and/or may include a wrist-strap.
In some examples, the control device 2820 may include an EMG control interface similar to the device illustrated in
The control device, such as wearable control device 2820, may include an analog circuit including at least one amplifier configured to amplify analog electrical signals originating from a body of the user (e.g., from electrodes in contact with the skin, and/or one or more other sensors), and an analog-to-digital converter configured to convert the amplified analog electrical signals to digital signals that may be used to control the system, such as a virtual reality (VR) and/or augmented reality (AR) system.
In some examples, an augmented reality system may include a magnetic tracker. The magnetic tracker may include a transmitter positioned in the headset, or other location, and one or more receivers, that may be associated with tracked objects or body parts of a user (such as hands, or other limbs or portions thereof, or joints) of a user.
In some examples,
In some examples, event detection and classification may be performed by unsupervised or self-supervised models, and these approaches may be used to detect user gestures. Models may be trained for a particular user, or in some examples a model may be trained on a different user, and the training data for the different user adapted for use with a present user. In example training approaches, EMG data may be detected, and optionally recorded for analysis. A model may be trained using EMG data that may be obtained as one or more users perform one or more gestures. Example gestures include finger taps (e.g., simulated keypresses), other finger movements (such as finger curls, swipes, pointing gestures, and the like), or other types of gestures and/or sensor data may be analogously used to train example event detector models.
In some embodiments, by building an embedding space including a single user model, clearly separable clusters of events may be obtained. Clustering techniques may be implemented to determine labels for each event, and a user specific model may be then trained using the labeled data. By using at least one of these techniques, a very high accuracy rate (e.g., 98% accuracy rate) may be reached in a purely unsupervised fashion. For instance, using a relatively small number of samples (e.g., less than 40 event samples), a relatively high (e.g., 95% accuracy) may be achieved.
Further, in some embodiments, single-user event templates may be adapted to other users, reducing further the amount of additional data that may be needed for use of the models with the adapted users. For instance, domains may be adapted using PLS by aligning datasets across pairs of users. For instance, a PLS may be trained to align event templates across users. An ensemble of aligned user templates may lead to a high accuracy (e.g., 96% accuracy), requiring very few event data to be collected (e.g., less than 10 events).
Poses may be defined as body positions that are static over time and in theory may be maintained indefinitely. In contrast, in some examples, gestures may be defined as including dynamic body positions, that may have a start time and an end time, per occurrence. Accordingly, gestures may be defined as discrete events of a particular gesture type. Representative examples of gesture types include snaps, finger taps, finger curls or bends, pointing, swiping, turning, grasping, or other finger motions. In some examples, gestures may include movements of at least a portion of the arm, wrist, or hand, or other muscle activation. In some examples, visually perceptible movement of the user may not be required, and a gesture may be defined by a muscle activation pattern, independent of any visually perceptible movement of a portion of the user's body.
A generic event detector may generate an output signal when a gesture event is detected, for example, in a continuous stream of electromyography (EMG) data. A control signal for a computer device, such as an artificial reality system, may be based on the output signal of the generic event detector. The generic event detector may produce an output signal each time a user performs a gesture. In some examples, the output signal may be produced independently of the type of performed gesture. In some examples, an event classifier may execute when the event detector detects an event, such as a gesture. The event classifier may determine information related to the gesture, such as a gesture type, performed by the user. The gesture type may include one or more of the following: a physical action performed, the body part (such as a finger or other body part) used to perform the physical action, an intended action of the user, other physical action(s) performed the same or an approximately same time. A control signal may also be based on a combination of sensor data from one or more sensor types. A corresponding control signal may be sent to an augmented reality (AR) system, and the control signal may be based, at least in part, on the gesture type. The control signal may modify the artificial reality display by one or more of the following: selection of an item, performance of a task, movement of an object by a degree and/or direction that may be, at least in part, determined by the gesture type, interaction with a user interface of an object (e.g., a real or virtual object), or other action. In some embodiments, gestures may be classified as a particular gesture type based on one or more electromyography signals, such as electromyography wavelets.
In some examples, a method of detecting events, such as gestures, may include obtaining first set of electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a gesture of a first user, training a first classifier by clustering event data determined from the obtained first set of EMG signals, labeling a second set of obtained EMG data using the first classifier, and training an event detector using the labeled second set of EMG data.
In some examples, a method for classifying events, such as gestures, may include one or more of the following steps; generating a plurality of single user event classifiers, generating a multi-user event classifier using the plurality of single user classifiers, labeling electromyography (EMG) data using the generated multi-user classifier, generating data transformations corresponding to a plurality of users, generating a single user classifier correlated with a first user of the plurality of users, labeling received EMG data for a second user of the plurality of users using the data transformation for the second user and the single user classifier for the first user, and training the event detector using the labeled EMG data.
In some examples, a method for training an event detector, such as a gesture detector, is provided. The method may include one or more of the following steps; obtaining electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to the gesture, generating feature data from the EMG data, detecting events in the feature data, generating epochs using the feature data, where each epoch may be centered around one of the detected events, clustering the epochs into types, where at least one the types may correspond to the gesture, aligning the epochs by type to generate aligned epochs, training a labeling model using the aligned epochs, labeling the feature data using the labeling model to generate labeled feature data, and training an event detector using the labeled feature data.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier may include one or more of the following steps; obtaining electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a plurality of gestures, generating feature data from the EMG data, detecting events in the feature data using an event detector, generating epochs using the feature data, each epoch centered around one of the detected events, generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs, labeling the EMG data using the single-user event classification model, and training an event classifier using the labeled EMG data.
In some examples, a method of generating a single-user event classification model using epochs may include one or more of the following steps; generating vectorized epochs using the epochs, and generating the single-user event classification model by training one or more of a logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron classifier using the vectorized epochs. In some examples, wherein generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs includes generating spatially-filtered, reduced-dimension epochs using the epochs, generating vectorized epochs using the spatially-filtered, reduced-dimension epochs, and generating the single-user event classification model by training one or more of a logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron classifier using the vectorized epochs. In some examples, wherein generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs includes generating one or more event models using the epochs, each event model corresponding to a gestures, generating combined epochs by combining each of the epochs with the one or more event models, and generating the single-user event classification model by training one or more of a logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron classifier using the combined epochs.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier is provided. The method may include one or more of the following steps; obtaining electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a plurality of gestures for a plurality of users, generating feature data from the EMG data, detecting events in the feature data using an event detector, generating epochs using the feature data, each epoch centered around one of the detected events, generating a cross-user event classification model using the epochs, labeling the EMG data using the cross-user event classification model, and training an event classifier using the labeled EMG data.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier is provided. The method may include one or more of the following steps; generating an embedding model using a plurality of single user event classification models, generating embedded events using the embedding model and electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a plurality of gestures for a user, clustering the embedded events into clusters corresponding to the plurality of gestures, associating labels with the EMG data based on the clustered embedded events, and training an event classifier for the user using the EMG data and associated labels.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier is provided. The method may include one or more of the following steps; generating, for each of a plurality of users, an event template for each of a plurality of events, determining alignment transformations between the event templates for each of the plurality of events across the plurality of users, transforming EMG data for a first user using ones of the determined alignment transformations for a second user, associating labels with the EMG data using the transform EMG data and a single user event classification model of the second user, and training an event classifier for the user using the EMG data and associated labels.
In some examples, a system for gesture detection is provided. The system may include at least one processor, and at least one non-transitory memory including instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system for gesture detection to perform operations including associating, using an event detector, an event label with a portion of electromyography data, in response to associating the event label with the portion of electromyography data associating, using an event classifier, a gesture label with the portion of electromyography data, and outputting an indication of at least one of the event label or the gesture label.
Examples described herein may include various suitable combinations of example aspects, provided such aspects are not incompatible.
Example systems and methods may include user-based models for detecting gestures in an accurate and unsupervised manner. Event detector models are provided that may be trained on a limited set of user data for a particular user, and using labels and clustering methods, the accuracy of the event detector may be increased while limiting the number of event data instances.
By building an embedding space including a single user model, clearly separable cluster of events may be obtained. Clustering techniques may be implemented to determine labels of each event and a user specific model may be then trained using the labeled data. In some examples, 98% accuracy may be reached by applying this process, in a purely unsupervised fashion. Also, 95% accuracy may be reached using a limited number (e.g., 40) of event samples.
Domain adaptation with PLS may include the one or more of the following. Dataset across pairs of users may be aligned by training a PLS to align the event templates. An ensemble of aligned single user may lead to 96% accuracy. The alignment requires very little data to be performed (such as less than 10 events).
A generic event detector may emit an output signal when a gesture event is detected in a continuous stream of electromyography (EMG) data. An example generic event detector may produce an output signal each time a user performs a gesture, and the output signal may be produced independently of the type of performed gesture.
An event classifier may execute when the event detector identifies a gesture event. The event classifier may then determine the gesture type performed by a user.
In some examples, a method for detecting events may include one or more of the following: obtaining first set of electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a gesture of a first user; training a first classifier by clustering event data determined from the obtained first set of EMG signals; and labeling a second set of obtained EMG data using the first classifier; and training an event detector using the labeled second set of EMG data. Example approaches may include providing a general event detector.
In some examples, a method for classifying events may include one or more of the following: generating a plurality of single user event classifiers; generating a multi-user event classifier using the plurality of single user classifiers; labeling electromyography (EMG) data using the generated multi-user classifier; generating data transformations corresponding to a plurality of users; generating a single user classifier correlated with a first user of the plurality of users; labeling received EMG data for a second user of the plurality of users using the data transformation for the second user and the single user classifier for the first user; and training the event detector using the labeled EMG data. Example approaches may include providing a general event classifier.
In some examples, a method for training an event detector may include one or more of the following: obtaining electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a gesture; generating feature data from the EMG data; detecting events in the feature data; generating epochs using the feature data, each epoch centered around one of the detected events; clustering the epochs into types, at least one the types corresponding to the gesture; aligning the epochs by type to generate aligned epochs; training a labeling model using the aligned epochs; labeling the feature data using the labeling model to generate labeled feature data; and training an event detector using the labeled feature data. Example approaches may include generating a classifier to label unlabeled data, and then generating an event detector using the labeled data.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier may include one or more of the following: obtaining electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a plurality of gestures; generating feature data from the EMG data; detecting events in the feature data using an event detector; generating epochs using the feature data, each epoch centered around one of the detected events; generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs; labeling the EMG data using the single-user event classification model; and training an event classifier using the labeled EMG data. Example approaches may include generating a single-user event classification model to label unlabeled data, then generating an event classifier using the labeled data.
In some examples, generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs may include one or more of the following: generating vectorized epochs using the epochs; and generating the single-user event classification model by training one or more of a logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron classifier using the vectorized epochs. Example approaches may include generating a single-user event classification model from vectorized trials.
In some examples, generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs may include one or more of the following: generating spatially-filtered, reduced-dimension epochs using the epochs; generating vectorized epochs using the spatially-filtered, reduced-dimension epochs; and generating the single-user event classification model by training one or more of a logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron classifier using the vectorized epochs. This approach may be used to generate a single-user event classification model from reduced dimension data generated by spatially filtering the trials.
In some examples, generating a single-user event classification model using the epochs may include one or more of the following: generating one or more event models using the epochs, each event model corresponding to a gesture; generating combined epochs by combining each of the epochs with the one or more event models; and generating the single-user event classification model by training one or more of a logistic regression, random forest, or multilayer perceptron classifier using the combined epochs. Example approaches may include generating a single-user event classification model by generating event templates and concatenating the event templates with the trials.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier includes one or more of the following: obtaining electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a plurality of gestures for a plurality of users; generating feature data from the EMG data; detecting events in the feature data using an event detector; generating epochs using the feature data, each epoch centered around one of the detected events; generating a cross-user event classification model using the epochs; and labeling the EMG data using the cross-user event classification model; and training an event classifier using the labeled EMG data. Example approaches may include generating a cross-user event classification model to label unlabeled data, and then generating an event classifier using the labeled data.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier may include one or more of the following: generating an embedding model using a plurality of single user event classification models; generating embedded events using the embedding model and electromyography (EMG) data including EMG signals corresponding to a plurality of gestures for a user; clustering the embedded events into clusters corresponding to the plurality of gestures; associating labels with the EMG data based on the clustered embedded events; and training an event classifier for the user using the EMG data and associated labels. Example approaches may include generating a user independent event classification model to label unlabeled data from an ensemble of single-user event classification models, and then generating an event classifier using the labeled data.
In some examples, a method for training an event classifier may include one or more of the following: generating, for each of a plurality of users, an event template for each of a plurality of events; determining alignment transformations between the event templates for each of the plurality of events across the plurality of users; transforming EMG data for a first user using at least one of the determined alignment transformations for a second user; associating labels with the EMG data using the transform EMG data and a single user event classification model of the second user; and training an event classifier for the user using the EMG data and associated labels. Example approaches may include using alignment transformations between users to transform data for labeling by a single user-specific event classification model, then generating an event classifier using the labeled data.
In some examples, a system for gesture detection may be configured to use an event detector to identify gestures and an event classifier to classify gestures, where the event detector may be trained using a training method (such as a training method described herein). In some examples, a system for gesture detection may include: at least one processor; and at least one non-transitory memory including instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system for gesture detection to perform operations including: associating, using an event detector, an event label with a portion of electromyography data; in response to associating the event label with the portion of electromyography data associating, using an event classifier, a gesture label with the portion of electromyography data; and outputting an indication of at least one of the event label or the gesture lab.
Exemplary computer-implemented methods may be performed by any suitable computer-executable code and/or computing system, where one or more steps of the method may represent an algorithm whose structure may include and/or may be represented by multiple sub-steps.
In some examples, a system includes at least one physical processor, and physical memory including computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the physical processor, cause the physical processor to perform one or more methods or method steps as described herein. In some examples, a computer-implemented method may include the detection and classification of gestures, and control of an artificial reality system using detected gesture types.
In some examples, a non-transitory computer-readable medium includes one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to perform one or more method steps as described herein. In some examples, a computer-implemented method may include the detection and classification of gestures, and control of an artificial reality system using detected gesture types.
Examples include a control device including a plurality of electromyography (EMG) sensors, and/or other sensors, and at least one physical processor programmed to receive sensor data, detect sensor signals corresponding to user gestures within the sensor data, classify the sensor signals to identify gesture types, and provide control signals based on the gesture types. The control signals may trigger the head-mounted device to modify the artificial reality view.
Example 1. An example system includes: a head-mounted device configured to present an artificial reality view to a user; a control device including a plurality of electromyography (EMG) sensors including electrodes that contact the skin of the user when the control device is worn by the user; at least one physical processor; and physical memory including computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the physical processor, cause the physical processor to: process one or more EMG signals as detected by the EMG sensors; classify the processed one or more EMG signals into one or more gesture types; provide control signals based on the gesture types, where the control signals trigger the head-mounted device to modify at least one aspect of the artificial reality view.
2. The system of example 1, wherein the at least one physical processor is located within the control device.
Example 3. The system of any of examples 1-2, wherein the at least one physical processor is located within the head mounted device, or within an external computer device in communication with the control device.
Example 4. The system of any of examples 1-3, wherein the computer-executable instructions when executed by the physical processor, cause the physical processor to classify the processed EMG signals into one or more gesture types using a classifier model.
Example 5. The system of any of examples 1-4, wherein the classifier model is trained using training data including a plurality of EMG training signals for the gesture type.
Example 6. The system of any of examples 1-5, wherein the training data is obtained from a plurality of users.
Example 7. The system of any of examples 1-6, wherein the head mounted device includes a virtual reality headset or an augmented reality device.
Example 8. An example method includes obtaining one or more electromyography (EMG) signals from a user; processing the one or more EMG signals to generate associated feature data; classifying the associated feature data into one or more gesture types using a classifier model; and providing a control signal to an artificial reality (AR) device, based on the one or more gesture types, wherein the classifier model is trained using training data including a plurality of EMG training signals for the one or more gesture types.
Example 9. The method of example 8, wherein the classifier model is trained by clustering feature data determined from EMG training signals.
Example 10. The method of any of examples 8-9, wherein the classifier model is trained using EMG training signals obtained from a plurality of users.
Example 11. The method of any of examples 8-10, wherein the plurality of users does not include the user.
Example 12. The method of any of examples 8-11, further including training the classifier model by: obtaining EMG training signals corresponding to a gesture type; training the classifier model by clustering EMG training data obtained from the EMG training signals.
Example 13. The method of any of examples 8-12, where in the classifier model is further trained by: determining the time dependence of EMG training signals relative to a time of a respective EMG training signal maximum; aligning the time dependence of a plurality of EMG training signals by adding a time offset to at least one EMG training signal of the plurality of EMG training signals; obtaining a signal characteristic from the aligned plurality of EMG training signals; and training the classifier model to detect EMG signals having the signal characteristic.
Example 14. The method of any of examples 8-13, wherein the classified model is further trained by: obtaining training data including EMG training signals corresponding to a gesture type; and averaging the EMG training signals corresponding to each occurrence of the gesture type to obtain a gesture model for the gesture type, wherein the classifier model uses the gesture model to classify EMG signals.
Example 15. The method of any of examples 8-14, wherein the gesture model is a user-specific gesture model for the gesture type.
Example 16. The method of any of examples 8-14, wherein the gesture model is a multiple user gesture model based on EMG training data obtained from a plurality of users, the multiple user gesture model being a combination of a plurality of user-specific gesture models.
Example 17. The method of any of examples 8-16, wherein the artificial reality device includes a head-mounted device configured to present an artificial reality image to a user, the method further including modifying the artificial reality image based on the control signal.
Example 18. The method of any of examples 8-17, wherein modifying the artificial reality image includes selection or control of an object in the artificial reality image based on the gesture type.
Example 19. An non-transitory computer-readable medium includes one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to: receive one or more electromyography (EMG) signals as detected by EMG sensors; process the one or more EMG signals to identify one or more features corresponding to a user gesture types; use the one or more features to classify the one or more EMG signals into the gesture type; provide a control signal based on the gesture type; and transmit the control signals to a head-mounted device to trigger the modification of an artificial reality view in response to the control signals.
Example 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of example 19, wherein the computer device is configured to classify the EMG signals to the identify gesture type based on a gesture model determined from training data obtained from a plurality of users.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may include or be implemented in conjunction with various types of artificial reality systems. Artificial reality is a form of reality that has been adjusted in some manner before presentation to a user, that may include, for example, a virtual reality, an augmented reality, a mixed reality, a hybrid reality, or some combination and/or derivative thereof. Artificial-reality content may include completely computer-generated content or computer-generated content combined with captured (e.g., real-world) content. The artificial-reality content may include video, audio, haptic feedback, or some combination thereof, any of that may be presented in a single channel or in multiple channels (such as stereo video that produces a three-dimensional (3D) effect to the viewer). Additionally, in some embodiments, artificial reality may also be associated with applications, products, accessories, services, or some combination thereof, that are used to, for example, create content in an artificial reality and/or are otherwise used in (e.g., to perform activities in) an artificial reality.
Artificial-reality systems may be implemented in a variety of different form factors and configurations. Some artificial reality systems may be designed to work without near-eye displays (NEDs). Other artificial reality systems may include an NED that also provides visibility into the real world (e.g., augmented-reality system 3100 in
Turning to
In some embodiments, augmented-reality system 3100 may include one or more sensors, such as sensor 3140. Sensor 3140 may generate measurement signals in response to motion of augmented-reality system 3100 and may be located on substantially any portion of frame 3110. Sensor 3140 may represent a position sensor, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), a depth camera assembly, a structured light emitter and/or detector, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, augmented-reality system 3100 may or may not include sensor 3140 or may include more than one sensor. In embodiments in which sensor 3140 includes an IMU, the IMU may generate calibration data based on measurement signals from sensor 3140. Examples of sensor 3140 may include, without limitation, accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, other suitable types of sensors that detect motion, sensors used for error correction of the IMU, or some combination thereof.
Augmented-reality system 3100 may also include a microphone array with a plurality of acoustic transducers 3120(A)-1320(J), referred to collectively as acoustic transducers 3120. Acoustic transducers 3120 may be transducers that detect air pressure variations induced by sound waves. Each acoustic transducer 3120 may be configured to detect sound and convert the detected sound into an electronic format (e.g., an analog or digital format). The microphone array in
In some embodiments, one or more of acoustic transducers 3120(A)-(F) may be used as output transducers (e.g., speakers). For example, acoustic transducers 3120(A) and/or 3120(B) may be earbuds or any other suitable type of headphone or speaker.
The configuration of acoustic transducers 3120 of the microphone array may vary. While augmented-reality system 3100 is shown in
Acoustic transducers 3120(A) and 3120(B) may be positioned on different parts of the user's ear, such as behind the pinna, behind the tragus, and/or within the auricle or fossa. Or, there may be additional acoustic transducers 3120 on or surrounding the ear in addition to acoustic transducers 3120 inside the ear canal. Having an acoustic transducer 3120 positioned next to an ear canal of a user may enable the microphone array to collect information on how sounds arrive at the ear canal. By positioning at least two of acoustic transducers 3120 on either side of a user's head (e.g., as binaural microphones), augmented-reality system 3100 may simulate binaural hearing and capture a 3D stereo sound field around about a user's head. In some embodiments, acoustic transducers 3120(A) and 3120(B) may be connected to augmented-reality system 3100 using a wired connection 3130, and in other embodiments acoustic transducers 3120(A) and 3120(B) may be connected to augmented-reality system 3100 using a wireless connection (e.g., a Bluetooth connection). In still other embodiments, acoustic transducers 3120(A) and 3120(B) may not be used at all in conjunction with augmented-reality system 3100.
Acoustic transducers 3120 on frame 3110 may be positioned along the length of the temples, across the bridge, above or below display devices 3115(A) and 3115(B), or some combination thereof. Acoustic transducers 3120 may be oriented such that the microphone array is able to detect sounds in a wide range of directions surrounding the user wearing the augmented-reality system 3100. In some embodiments, an optimization process may be performed during manufacturing of augmented-reality system 3100 to determine relative positioning of each acoustic transducer 3120 in the microphone array.
In some examples, augmented-reality system 3100 may include or be connected to an external device (e.g., a paired device), such as neckband 3105. Neckband 3105 generally represents any type or form of paired device. Thus, the following discussion of neckband 3105 may also apply to various other paired devices, such as charging cases, smart watches, smart phones, wrist bands, other wearable devices, hand-held controllers, tablet computers, laptop computers, other external compute devices, etc.
As shown, neckband 3105 may be coupled to eyewear device 3102 using one or more connectors. The connectors may be wired or wireless and may include electrical and/or non-electrical (e.g., structural) components. In some cases, eyewear device 3102 and neckband 3105 may operate independently without any wired or wireless connection between them. While
Pairing external devices, such as neckband 3105, with augmented-reality eyewear devices may enable the eyewear devices to achieve the form factor of a pair of glasses while still providing sufficient battery and computation power for expanded capabilities. Some or all of the battery power, computational resources, and/or additional features of augmented-reality system 3100 may be provided by a paired device or shared between a paired device and an eyewear device, thus reducing the weight, heat profile, and form factor of the eyewear device overall while still retaining desired functionality. For example, neckband 3105 may allow components that would otherwise be included on an eyewear device to be included in neckband 3105 since users may tolerate a heavier weight load on their shoulders than they would tolerate on their heads. Neckband 3105 may also have a larger surface area over which to diffuse and disperse heat to the ambient environment. Thus, neckband 3105 may allow for greater battery and computation capacity than might otherwise have been possible on a stand-alone eyewear device. Since weight carried in neckband 3105 may be less invasive to a user than weight carried in eyewear device 3102, a user may tolerate wearing a lighter eyewear device and carrying or wearing the paired device for greater lengths of time than a user would tolerate wearing a heavy standalone eyewear device, thereby enabling users to more fully incorporate artificial reality environments into their day-to-day activities.
Neckband 3105 may be communicatively coupled with eyewear device 3102 and/or to other devices. These other devices may provide certain functions (e.g., tracking, localizing, depth mapping, processing, storage, etc.) to augmented-reality system 3100. In the embodiment of
Acoustic transducers 3120(I) and 3120(J) of neckband 3105 may be configured to detect sound and convert the detected sound into an electronic format (analog or digital). In the embodiment of
Controller 3125 of neckband 3105 may process information generated by the sensors on neckband 3105 and/or augmented-reality system 3100. For example, controller 3125 may process information from the microphone array that describes sounds detected by the microphone array. For each detected sound, controller 3125 may perform a direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation to estimate a direction from which the detected sound arrived at the microphone array. As the microphone array detects sounds, controller 3125 may populate an audio data set with the information. In embodiments in which augmented-reality system 3100 includes an inertial measurement unit, controller 3125 may compute all inertial and spatial calculations from the IMU located on eyewear device 3102. A connector may convey information between augmented-reality system 3100 and neckband 3105 and between augmented-reality system 3100 and controller 3125. The information may be in the form of optical data, electrical data, wireless data, or any other transmittable data form. Moving the processing of information generated by augmented-reality system 3100 to neckband 3105 may reduce weight and heat in eyewear device 3102, making it more comfortable to the user.
Power source 3135 in neckband 3105 may provide power to eyewear device 3102 and/or to neckband 3105. Power source 3135 may include, without limitation, lithium ion batteries, lithium-polymer batteries, primary lithium batteries, alkaline batteries, or any other form of power storage. In some cases, power source 3135 may be a wired power source. Including power source 3135 on neckband 3105 instead of on eyewear device 3102 may help better distribute the weight and heat generated by power source 3135.
As noted, some artificial reality systems may, instead of blending an artificial reality with actual reality, substantially replace one or more of a user's sensory perceptions of the real world with a virtual experience. One example of this type of system is a head-worn display system, such as virtual-reality system 3200 in
Artificial reality systems may include a variety of types of visual feedback mechanisms. For example, display devices in augmented-reality system 3100 and/or virtual-reality system 3200 may include one or more liquid crystal displays (LCDs), light emitting diode (LED) displays, organic LED (OLED) displays digital light project (DLP) micro-displays, liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS) micro-displays, and/or any other suitable type of display screen. Artificial reality systems may include a single display screen for both eyes or may provide a display screen for each eye, that may allow for additional flexibility for varifocal adjustments or for correcting a user's refractive error. Some artificial reality systems may also include optical subsystems having one or more lenses (e.g., conventional concave or convex lenses, Fresnel lenses, adjustable liquid lenses, etc.) through which a user may view a display screen. These optical subsystems may serve a variety of purposes, including to collimate (e.g., make an object appear at a greater distance than its physical distance), to magnify (e.g., make an object appear larger than its actual size), and/or to relay light (to, e.g., the viewer's eyes). These optical subsystems may be used in a non-pupil-forming architecture (such as a single lens configuration that directly collimates light but may result in so-called pincushion distortion) and/or a pupil-forming architecture (such as a multi-lens configuration that may produce barrel distortion to nullify pincushion distortion).
In addition to or instead of using display screens, some artificial reality systems may include one or more projection systems. For example, display devices in augmented-reality system 3100 and/or virtual-reality system 3200 may include micro-LED projectors that project light (using, e.g., a waveguide) into display devices, such as clear combiner lenses that allow ambient light to pass through. The display devices may refract the projected light toward a user's pupil and may enable a user to simultaneously view both artificial reality content and the real world. The display devices may accomplish this using any of a variety of different optical components, including waveguides components (e.g., holographic, planar, diffractive, polarized, and/or reflective waveguide elements), light-manipulation surfaces and elements (such as diffractive, reflective, and refractive elements and gratings), coupling elements, etc. Artificial reality systems may also be configured with any other suitable type or form of image projection system, such as retinal projectors used in virtual retina displays.
Artificial reality systems may also include various types of computer vision components and subsystems. For example, augmented-reality system 3100 and/or virtual-reality system 3200 may include one or more optical sensors, such as two-dimensional (2D) or 3D cameras, structured light transmitters and detectors, time-of-flight depth sensors, single-beam or sweeping laser rangefinders, 3D LiDAR sensors, and/or any other suitable type or form of optical sensor. An artificial reality system may process data from one or more of these sensors to identify a location of a user, to map the real world, to provide a user with context about real-world surroundings, and/or to perform a variety of other functions.
Artificial reality systems may also include one or more input and/or output audio transducers. For example, elements 3206(A), and 3206(B) may include voice coil speakers, ribbon speakers, electrostatic speakers, piezoelectric speakers, bone conduction transducers, cartilage conduction transducers, tragus-vibration transducers, and/or any other suitable type or form of audio transducer. Similarly, input audio transducers may include condenser microphones, dynamic microphones, ribbon microphones, and/or any other type or form of input transducer. In some embodiments, a single transducer may be used for both audio input and audio output.
In some examples, artificial reality systems may include tactile (i.e., haptic) feedback systems, that may be incorporated into headwear, gloves, body suits, handheld controllers, environmental devices (e.g., chairs, floormats, etc.), and/or any other type of device or system. Haptic feedback systems may provide various types of cutaneous feedback, including vibration, force, traction, texture, and/or temperature. Haptic feedback systems may also provide various types of kinesthetic feedback, such as motion and compliance. Haptic feedback may be implemented using motors, piezoelectric actuators, fluidic systems, and/or a variety of other types of feedback mechanisms. Haptic feedback systems may be implemented independent of other artificial reality devices, within other artificial reality devices, and/or in conjunction with other artificial reality devices.
By providing haptic sensations, audible content, and/or visual content, artificial reality systems may create an entire virtual experience or enhance a user's real-world experience in a variety of contexts and environments. For instance, artificial reality systems may assist or extend a user's perception, memory, or cognition within a particular environment. Some systems may enhance a user's interactions with other people in the real world or may enable more immersive interactions with other people in a virtual world. Artificial reality systems may also be used for educational purposes (e.g., for teaching or training in schools, hospitals, government organizations, military organizations, business enterprises, etc.), entertainment purposes (e.g., for playing video games, listening to music, watching video content, etc.), and/or for accessibility purposes (e.g., as hearing aids, visuals aids, etc.). The embodiments disclosed herein may enable or enhance a user's artificial reality experience in one or more of these contexts and environments and/or in other contexts and environments.
As detailed above, the computing devices and systems described and/or illustrated herein broadly represent any type or form of computing device or system capable of executing computer-readable instructions, such as those contained within the modules described herein. In their most basic configuration, these computing device(s) may each include at least one memory device and at least one physical processor.
In some examples, the term “memory device” generally refers to any type or form of volatile or non-volatile storage device or medium capable of storing data and/or computer-readable instructions. In one example, a memory device may store, load, and/or maintain one or more of the modules described herein. Examples of memory devices include, without limitation, Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), flash memory, Hard Disk Drives (HDDs), Solid-State Drives (SSDs), optical disk drives, caches, variations or combinations of one or more of the same, or any other suitable storage memory.
In some examples, the term “physical processor” generally refers to any type or form of hardware-implemented processing unit capable of interpreting and/or executing computer-readable instructions. In one example, a physical processor may access and/or modify one or more modules stored in the above-described memory device. Examples of physical processors include, without limitation, microprocessors, microcontrollers, Central Processing Units (CPUs), Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) that implement softcore processors, Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), portions of one or more of the same, variations or combinations of one or more of the same, or any other suitable physical processor.
Although illustrated as separate elements, the modules described and/or illustrated herein may represent portions of a single module or application. In addition, in certain embodiments one or more of these modules may represent one or more software applications or programs that, when executed by a computing device, may cause the computing device to perform one or more tasks. For example, one or more of the modules described and/or illustrated herein may represent modules stored and configured to run on one or more of the computing devices or systems described and/or illustrated herein. One or more of these modules may also represent all or portions of one or more special-purpose computers configured to perform one or more tasks.
In addition, one or more of the modules described herein may transform data, physical devices, and/or representations of physical devices from one form to another. For example, one or more of the modules recited herein may receive data to be transformed (such as data based on detected signals from a user, such as EMG data), transform the data, output a result of the transformation to perform a function (e.g., outputting control data, controlling an AR system, or other function), or otherwise use the result of the transformation to perform a function, and store the result of the transformation to perform a function. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of the modules recited herein may transform a processor, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, and/or any other portion of a physical computing device from one form to another by executing on the computing device, storing data on the computing device, and/or otherwise interacting with the computing device.
In some embodiments, the term “computer-readable medium” generally refers to any form of device, carrier, or medium capable of storing or carrying computer-readable instructions. Examples of computer-readable media include, without limitation, transmission-type media, such as carrier waves, and non-transitory-type media, such as magnetic-storage media (e.g., hard disk drives, tape drives, and floppy disks), optical-storage media (e.g., Compact Disks (CDs), Digital Video Disks (DVDs), and BLU-RAY disks), electronic-storage media (e.g., solid-state drives and flash media), and other distribution systems.
The process parameters and sequence of the steps described and/or illustrated herein are given by way of example only and may be varied as desired. For example, while the steps illustrated and/or described herein may be shown or discussed in a particular order, these steps do not necessarily need to be performed in the order illustrated or discussed. The various exemplary methods described and/or illustrated herein may also omit one or more of the steps described or illustrated herein or include additional steps in addition to those disclosed.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third” does not, by itself, connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed. Such terms may be used merely as labels to distinguish one element from another element having an otherwise similar name.
The preceding description has been provided to enable others skilled in the art to best utilize various aspects of the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein. This exemplary description is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The embodiments disclosed herein should be considered in all respects illustrative and not restrictive. Reference should be made to the appended claims and their equivalents in determining the scope of the present disclosure.
Unless otherwise noted, the terms “connected to” and “coupled to” (and their derivatives), as used in the specification and claims, are to be construed as permitting both direct and indirect (i.e., using other elements or components) connection. In addition, the terms “a” or “an,” as used in the specification and claims, are to be construed as meaning “at least one of.” Finally, for ease of use, the terms “including” and “having” (and their derivatives), as used in the specification and claims, are interchangeable with and have the same meaning as the word “including.”
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/826,478, filed Mar. 29, 2019, the disclosure of which is incorporated, in its entirety, by this reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1411995 | Dull | Apr 1922 | A |
| 3580243 | Johnson | May 1971 | A |
| 3620208 | Wayne et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3735425 | Hoshall et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3880146 | Everett et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4055168 | Miller et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4602639 | Hoogendoorn et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4705408 | Jordi | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4817064 | Milles | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4896120 | Kamil | Jan 1990 | A |
| 5003978 | Dunseath, Jr. | Apr 1991 | A |
| D322227 | Warhol | Dec 1991 | S |
| 5081852 | Cox | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5251189 | Thorp | Oct 1993 | A |
| D348660 | Parsons | Jul 1994 | S |
| 5445869 | Ishikawa et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5462065 | Cusimano | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5482051 | Reddy et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5605059 | Woodward | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5625577 | Tosiyasu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5683404 | Johnson | Nov 1997 | A |
| 6005548 | Latypov et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009210 | Kang | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6032530 | Hock | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6066794 | Longo | May 2000 | A |
| 6184847 | Fateh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6238338 | DeLuca et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6244873 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6377277 | Vamamoto | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| D459352 | Giovanniello | Jun 2002 | S |
| 6411843 | Zarychta | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6487906 | Hock | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6510333 | Licata et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6527711 | Stivoric et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6619836 | Silvant et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6658287 | Litt et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6720984 | Jorgensen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6743982 | Biegelsen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6771294 | Pulli et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6774885 | Even-Zohar | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6807438 | Brun Del Re et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| D502661 | Rapport | Mar 2005 | S |
| D502662 | Rapport | Mar 2005 | S |
| 6865409 | Getsla et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| D503646 | Rapport | Apr 2005 | S |
| 6880364 | Vidolin et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6901286 | Sinderby et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6927343 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6942621 | Winash et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6965842 | Rekimoto | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6972734 | Ohshima et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6984208 | Zheng | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7022919 | Brist et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7086218 | Pasach | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7089148 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| D535401 | Travis et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
| 7173437 | Hervieux et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7209114 | Radley-Smith | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| D543212 | Marks | May 2007 | S |
| 7265298 | Maghribi et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7271774 | Puuri | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7333090 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7351975 | Brady et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7450107 | Radley-Smith | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7491892 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7517725 | Reis | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7558622 | Tran | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7574253 | Edney et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580742 | Tan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7596393 | Jung et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7618260 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7636549 | Ma et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640007 | Chen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7660126 | Cho et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7761390 | Ford | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7787946 | Stahmann et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7805386 | Greer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7809435 | Ettare et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7844310 | Anderson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7870211 | Pascal et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7901368 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7925100 | Howell et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7948763 | Chuang | May 2011 | B2 |
| D643428 | Janky et al. | Aug 2011 | S |
| D646192 | Woode | Oct 2011 | S |
| 8054061 | Prance et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| D654622 | Hsu | Feb 2012 | S |
| 8170656 | Tan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8179604 | Prada Gomez et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8188937 | Amafuji et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8190249 | Gharieb et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| D661613 | Demeglio | Jun 2012 | S |
| 8203502 | Chi et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8207473 | Axisa et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8212859 | Tang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8311623 | Sanger | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8348538 | Van Loenen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8351651 | Lee | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8355671 | Kramer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8384683 | Luo | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8389862 | Arora et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8421634 | Tan et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8427977 | Workman et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| D682727 | Bulgari | May 2013 | S |
| 8435191 | Barboutis et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8437844 | Syed Momen et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8447704 | Tan et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8467270 | Gossweiler, III et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8469741 | Oster et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8484022 | Vanhoucke | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| D689862 | Liu | Sep 2013 | S |
| 8591411 | Banet et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| D695454 | Moore | Dec 2013 | S |
| 8620361 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8624124 | Koo et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8702629 | Giuffrida et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8704882 | Turner | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8718980 | Garudadri et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8743052 | Keller et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
| 8744543 | Li et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8754862 | Zaliva | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8777668 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| D716457 | Brefka et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
| D717685 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2014 | S |
| 8879276 | Wang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8880163 | Barachant et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8883287 | Boyce et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8890875 | Jammes et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8892479 | Tan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8895865 | Lenahan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8912094 | Koo et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914472 | Lee et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
| 8922481 | Kauffmann et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
| 8970571 | Wong et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8971023 | Olsson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9018532 | Wesselmann et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9037530 | Tan et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9086687 | Park et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9092664 | Forutanpour et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| D736664 | Paradise et al. | Aug 2015 | S |
| 9146730 | Lazar | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| D741855 | Park et al. | Oct 2015 | S |
| 9170674 | Forutanpour et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| D742272 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2015 | S |
| D742874 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2015 | S |
| D743963 | Osterhout | Nov 2015 | S |
| 9182826 | Powledge et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9211417 | Heldman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9218574 | Phillipps et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| D747714 | Erbeus | Jan 2016 | S |
| 9235934 | Mandella et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9240069 | Li | Jan 2016 | B1 |
| D750623 | Park et al. | Mar 2016 | S |
| D751065 | Magi | Mar 2016 | S |
| 9278453 | Assad | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9299248 | Lake et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| D756359 | Bailey et al. | May 2016 | S |
| 9329694 | Slonneger | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9341659 | Poupyrev et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9351653 | Harrison | May 2016 | B1 |
| 9367139 | Ataee et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9372535 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9389694 | Ataee et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9393418 | Giuffrida et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9402582 | Parviz et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9408316 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9418927 | Axisa et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9439566 | Arne et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9459697 | Bedikian et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9472956 | Michaelis et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9477313 | Mistry et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9483123 | Aleem et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9529434 | Choi et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9597015 | McNames et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9600030 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9612661 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9613262 | Holz | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9654477 | Kotamraju | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9659403 | Horowitz | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9687168 | John | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9696795 | Margolina et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9720515 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9741169 | Holz | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9766709 | Holz | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9785247 | Horowitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9788789 | Bailey | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9864431 | Keskin et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9867548 | Le et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9880632 | Ataee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9891718 | Connor | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9921641 | Worley, III et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
| 10042422 | Morun et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10070799 | Ang et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10078435 | Noel | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10101809 | Morun et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10152082 | Bailey | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10188309 | Morun et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10199008 | Aleem et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10203751 | Keskin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10216274 | Chapeskie et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10251577 | Morun et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10310601 | Morun et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10331210 | Morun et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10362958 | Morun et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10409371 | Kaifosh et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10437335 | Daniels | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10460455 | Giurgica-Tiron et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10489986 | Kaifosh et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10496168 | Kaifosh et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10504286 | Kaifosh et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10520378 | Brown et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
| 10528135 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10558273 | Park et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10592001 | Berenzweig et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10610737 | Crawford | Apr 2020 | B1 |
| 10676083 | De Sapio et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
| 10687759 | Guo et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10905350 | Berenzweig et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10905383 | Barachant | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10937414 | Berenzweig et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10990174 | Kaifosh et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11009951 | Bailey et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11150730 | Christopher et al. | Oct 2021 | B1 |
| 20020032386 | Sackner et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077534 | DuRousseau | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094701 | Biegelsen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198472 | Kramer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030036691 | Stanaland et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051505 | Robertson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144586 | Tsubata | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144829 | Geatz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171921 | Manabe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030184544 | Prudent | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010210 | Avinash et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054273 | Finneran et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068409 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073104 | Brun del Re et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080499 | Lui | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092839 | Shin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194500 | Rapport | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210165 | Marmaropoulos et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243342 | Rekimoto | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254617 | Hemmerling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005637 | Rapport | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012715 | Ford | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070227 | Shen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070791 | Edney et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115561 | Stahmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119701 | Lauter et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177038 | Kolpin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060037359 | Stinespring | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058699 | Vitiello et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061544 | Min et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121958 | Jung et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129057 | Maekawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149338 | Flaherty et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211956 | Sankai | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070009151 | Pittman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016265 | Davoodi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023662 | Brady et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070132785 | Ebersole et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148624 | Nativ | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172797 | Hada et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070177770 | Derchak et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185697 | Tan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256494 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285399 | Lund | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080001735 | Tran | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051673 | Kong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052643 | Ike et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080058668 | Momen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103639 | Troy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103769 | Schultz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136775 | Conant | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152217 | Greer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163130 | Westerman | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214360 | Stirling et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221487 | Zohar et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262772 | Luinge et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278497 | Jammes et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285805 | Luinge et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005700 | Joshi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090007597 | Hanevold | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090027337 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031757 | Harding | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090040016 | Ikeda | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090051544 | Niknejad | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079607 | Denison et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079813 | Hildreth | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090082692 | Hale et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090082701 | Zohar et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090102580 | Uchaykin | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112080 | Matthews | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124881 | Rytky | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189864 | Walker et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189867 | Krah et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195497 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204031 | Mcnames et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209878 | Sanger | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090251407 | Flake et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265671 | Sachs et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318785 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319230 | Case, Jr. et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326406 | Tan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327171 | Tan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100030532 | Arora et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100041974 | Ting et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063794 | Hernandez-Rebollar | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106044 | Linderman | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113910 | Brauers et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228487 | Leuthardt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234696 | Li et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100240981 | Barboutis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249635 | Van Der Reijden | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280628 | Sankai | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292595 | Paul | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292606 | Prakash et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292617 | Lei et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100293115 | Seyed Momen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306713 | Geisner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100315266 | Gunawardana et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100317958 | Beck et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110007035 | Shai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110018754 | Tojima et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066381 | Garudadr et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077484 | Van Slyke et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110082838 | Niemela | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092826 | Lee et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119216 | Wigdor | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110133934 | Tan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110134026 | Kang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151974 | Deaguero | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166434 | Gargiulo | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172503 | Knepper et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173204 | Murillo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173574 | Clavin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205242 | Friesen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213278 | Horak et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221672 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224556 | Moon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224564 | Moon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230782 | Bartol et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248914 | Sherr | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262002 | Lee | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270135 | Dooley et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295100 | Hegde et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313762 | Ben-David et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120007821 | Zaliva | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029322 | Wartena et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120051005 | Vanfleteren et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066163 | Balls et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120071780 | Barachant | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101357 | Hoskuldsson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117514 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120157789 | Kangas et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165695 | Kidmose et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120184838 | John et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120188158 | Tan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203076 | Fatta et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209134 | Morita et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265090 | Fink et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265480 | Oshima | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283526 | Gommesen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120293548 | Perez et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302858 | Kidmose et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323521 | De Foras et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130004033 | Trugenberger | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130005303 | Song et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130020948 | Han et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130027341 | Mastandrea | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130038707 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130077820 | Marais et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080794 | Hsieh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130106686 | Bennett | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123656 | Heck | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130127708 | Jung et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131538 | Gaw et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130135223 | Shai | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130141375 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144629 | Johnston et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165813 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191741 | Dickinson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130198694 | Rahman et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207889 | Chang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130217998 | Mahfouz et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130221996 | Poupyrev et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130232095 | Tan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130259238 | Xiang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130265229 | Forutanpour et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130265437 | Thorn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130271292 | McDermott | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130285913 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293580 | Spivack | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310979 | Herr et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130312256 | Wesselmann et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317382 | Le et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317648 | Assad | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130332196 | Pinsker | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140020945 | Hurwitz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140028546 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140045547 | Singamsetty et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049417 | Abdurrahman et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140052150 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140092009 | Yen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094675 | Luna et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098018 | Kim et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100432 | Golda et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140107493 | Yuen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140121471 | Walker | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140122958 | Greenebrg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142937 | Powledge et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143064 | Tran | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140147820 | Snow et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194062 | Palin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140196131 | Lee | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140198034 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140198035 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140198944 | Forutanpour et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140200432 | Banerji et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201666 | Bedikian et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140223462 | Aimone et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140236031 | Banet et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240103 | Lake et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240223 | Lake et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245200 | Holz | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249397 | Lake et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257141 | Giuffrida et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277622 | Raniere | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278139 | Hong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278441 | Ton et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140279860 | Pan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282282 | Holz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140285326 | Luna et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140297528 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140299362 | Park et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140304665 | Holz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140310595 | Acharya et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330404 | Abdelghani et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140334083 | Bailey | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140334653 | Luna et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140337861 | Chang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140340857 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344731 | Holz | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140349257 | Connor | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140354528 | Laughlin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140354529 | Laughlin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140355825 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140358024 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140358825 | Phillipps | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140359540 | Kelsey et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361988 | Katz et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364703 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140365163 | Jallon | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368428 | Pinault | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368474 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140375465 | Fenuccio et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140376773 | Holz | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150006120 | Sett et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150010203 | Muninder et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150011857 | Henson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150019135 | Kacyvenski | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150025355 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150029092 | Holz et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150035827 | Yamaoka et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045689 | Barone | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045699 | Mokaya et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051470 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150057506 | Luna et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150057770 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150065840 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150070270 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150070274 | Morozov | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150072326 | Mauri et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150084860 | Aleem et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150091790 | Forutanpour et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150094564 | Tashman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150099946 | Sahin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150106052 | Balakrishnan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150109202 | Ataee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150124566 | Lake et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150128094 | Baldwin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150141784 | Morun et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150148641 | Morun et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150157944 | Gottlieb | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150160621 | Yilmaz | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150169074 | Ataee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150170421 | Mandella et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150177841 | Vanblon et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182113 | Utter, II | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182130 | Utter, II | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182160 | Kim et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182163 | Utter | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182164 | Utter, II | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182165 | Miller et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150186609 | Utter, II | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150187355 | Parkinson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193949 | Katz et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150199025 | Holz | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150213191 | Abdelghani et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216475 | Luna et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150220152 | Tait et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223716 | Korkala et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150230756 | Luna et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150234426 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150237716 | Su et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150242009 | Xiao et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150242575 | Abovitz et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150261306 | Lake | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150261318 | Scavezze et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272483 | Etemad et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150277575 | Aleem et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288944 | Nistico et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150289995 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150296553 | DiFranco et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150302168 | De Sapio et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305672 | Grey et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150309563 | Connor | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150309582 | Gupta | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150312175 | Langholz | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150313496 | Connor | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150323998 | Kudekar et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150325202 | Lake et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150332013 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150346701 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150351690 | Toth et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355716 | Balasubramanian et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355718 | Slonneger | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150366504 | Connor | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150370326 | Chapeskie et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150370333 | Ataee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150379770 | Haley, Jr. et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160011668 | Gilad-Bachrach et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160020500 | Matsuda | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160026853 | Wexler et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160049073 | Lee | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160050037 | Webb | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160071319 | Fallon et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160092504 | Mitri et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160099010 | Sainath et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160107309 | Walsh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160113587 | Kothe et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160144172 | Hsueh et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160150636 | Otsubo | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156762 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160162604 | Xiaoli et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160170710 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160187992 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160195928 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160199699 | Klassen | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160202081 | Debieuvre et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206206 | Avila et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160207201 | Herr et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160217614 | Kraver et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160235323 | Tadi et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160239080 | Marcolina et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160242646 | Obma | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160259407 | Schick | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262687 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160263458 | Mather et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160274732 | Bang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160274758 | Bailey | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160275726 | Mullins | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160282947 | Schwarz et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160291768 | Cho et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160292497 | Kehtarnavaz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160309249 | Wu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160313798 | Connor | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160313801 | Wagner | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160313890 | Walline et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160313899 | Noel | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160314623 | Coleman et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160342227 | Natzke et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160350973 | Shapira et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170031502 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170035313 | Hong et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170061817 | Mettler | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170068445 | Lee et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170075426 | Camacho et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170079828 | Pedtke et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170080346 | Abbas | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170090604 | Barbier | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170091567 | Wang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095178 | Schoen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170119472 | Herrmann et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170123487 | Hazra et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170124474 | Kashyap | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170124816 | Yang et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170147077 | Park et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170161635 | Oono et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170188878 | Lee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170188980 | Ash | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170197142 | Stafford et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170209055 | Pantelopoulos et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170220923 | Bae et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170237789 | Harner et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170237901 | Lee et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170259167 | Cook et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170262064 | Ofir et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170277282 | Go | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170285744 | Juliato | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170285756 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170285757 | Robertson et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170285848 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296363 | Yetkin et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170301630 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170308118 | Ito | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170312614 | Tran et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170329392 | Keskin et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170329404 | Keskin et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340506 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170344706 | Torres et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170347908 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170371403 | Wetzler et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180000367 | Longinotti-Buitoni | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180018825 | Kim et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180020285 | Zass | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180020951 | Kaifosh et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180020978 | Kaifosh et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180020990 | Park et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180024634 | Kaifosh et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180024635 | Kaifosh et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180024641 | Mao et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180064363 | Morun et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180067553 | Morun et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180068489 | Kim et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180074332 | Li et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180081439 | Daniels | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180088675 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180088765 | Bailey | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180092599 | Kerth et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180093181 | Goslin et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180095542 | Mallinson | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180095630 | Bailey | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180101235 | Bodensteiner et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180101289 | Bailey | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180107275 | Chen et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180120948 | Aleem et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180133551 | Chang et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180140441 | Poirters | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180150033 | Lake et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180153430 | Ang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180153444 | Yang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180154140 | Bouton | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180168905 | Goodall et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180178008 | Bouton et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180217249 | La Salla et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180239430 | Tadi et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180240459 | Weng et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180247443 | Briggs et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180279919 | Bansbach et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180301057 | Hargrove et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180307314 | Connor | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180314879 | Khwaja et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180321745 | Morun et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180321746 | Morun et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180330549 | Brenton | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180333575 | Bouton | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344195 | Morun et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180356890 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180360379 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190008453 | Spoof | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190025919 | Tadi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190027141 | Strong et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190033967 | Morun et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190033974 | Mu et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190038166 | Tavabi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190076716 | Chiou et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190089898 | Kim et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190113973 | Coleman et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190121305 | Kaifosh et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190121306 | Kaifosh et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190146809 | Lee et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190150777 | Guo et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190192037 | Morun et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190196585 | Laszlo | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190196586 | Laszlo | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190197778 | Sachdeva et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190209034 | Deno et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190212817 | Kaifosh et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216619 | McDonnall et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190223748 | Al-Natsheh et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190227627 | Kaifosh et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228330 | Kaifosh et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228533 | Giurgica-Tiron et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228579 | Kaifosh et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228590 | Kaifosh et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228591 | Giurgica-Tiron et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190247650 | Tran | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190279407 | McHugh et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190294243 | Laszlo | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190056422 | Park et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190324549 | Araki et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190348026 | Berenzweig et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190348027 | Berenzweig et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190357787 | Barachant et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190362557 | Lacey et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200042089 | Ang | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200057661 | Bendfeldt | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200065569 | Nduka et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200069210 | Berenzweig et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200069211 | Berenzweig et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200073483 | Berenzweig et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200077955 | Shui et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200097081 | Stone et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200111260 | Osborn et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200142490 | Kiong et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200143795 | Park et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200163562 | Neaves | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205932 | Zar et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200225320 | Belskikh et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200245873 | Frank et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200275895 | Barachant | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200301509 | Liu et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305795 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200320335 | Shamun | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20210109598 | Zhang | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210117523 | Kim et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210290159 | Bruinsma et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20220256706 | Xiong et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2902045 | Aug 2014 | CA |
| 2921954 | Feb 2015 | CA |
| 2939644 | Aug 2015 | CA |
| 1838933 | Sep 2006 | CN |
| 103777752 | May 2014 | CN |
| 105009031 | Oct 2015 | CN |
| 105190477 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105190578 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 106102504 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 110300542 | Oct 2019 | CN |
| 111902077 | Nov 2020 | CN |
| 112074225 | Dec 2020 | CN |
| 112469469 | Mar 2021 | CN |
| 112822992 | May 2021 | CN |
| 4412278 | Oct 1995 | DE |
| 0301790 | Feb 1989 | EP |
| 1345210 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 2198521 | Jun 2012 | EP |
| 2541763 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2959394 | Dec 2015 | EP |
| 3104737 | Dec 2016 | EP |
| 3200051 | Aug 2017 | EP |
| 3487395 | May 2019 | EP |
| 2959394 | May 2021 | EP |
| H05277080 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 3103427 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2002287869 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2005095561 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2009050679 | Mar 2009 | JP |
| 2010520561 | Jun 2010 | JP |
| 2016507851 | Mar 2016 | JP |
| 2017509386 | Apr 2017 | JP |
| 2019023941 | Feb 2019 | JP |
| 2021072136 | May 2021 | JP |
| 20120094870 | Aug 2012 | KR |
| 20120097997 | Sep 2012 | KR |
| 20150123254 | Nov 2015 | KR |
| 20160121552 | Oct 2016 | KR |
| 20170067873 | Jun 2017 | KR |
| 20170107283 | Sep 2017 | KR |
| 10-1790147 | Oct 2017 | KR |
| 9527341 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| 2006086504 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2008109248 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| 2009042313 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2010104879 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2011070554 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2012155157 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2014130871 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2014186370 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| 2014194257 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2014197443 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2015027089 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| 2015073713 | May 2015 | WO |
| 2015081113 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015100172 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2015123445 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| 2015184760 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2015192117 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2015199747 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2016041088 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| 2017062544 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| 2017075611 | May 2017 | WO |
| 2017092225 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| 2017120669 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| 2017172185 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| 2017208167 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| 2018022602 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| 2018098046 | May 2018 | WO |
| 2019099758 | May 2019 | WO |
| 2019147953 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| 2019147958 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| 2019147996 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| 2019217419 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| 2019226259 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| 2019231911 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| 2020047429 | Mar 2020 | WO |
| 2020061440 | Mar 2020 | WO |
| 2020061451 | Mar 2020 | WO |
| 2020072915 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2020/025772 dated Aug. 3, 2020, 13 pages. |
| Cote-Allard et al., “Deep Learning for Electromyographic Hand Gesture Signal Classification Using Transfer Learning”, vol. 27, No. 4, Jan. 26, 2019, pp. 1-18. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19806723.3, dated Jul. 7, 2021, 13 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19810524.9, dated Mar. 17, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19850130.6, dated Sep. 1, 2021, 14 Pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19855191.3, dated Dec. 6, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19883839.3, dated Dec. 15, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Farina D., et al., “Man/Machine Interface Based on the Discharge Timings of Spinal Motor Neurons After Targeted Muscle Reinnervation,” Nature Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 6, 2017, vol. 1, Article No. 0025, pp. 1-12. |
| Favorskaya M., et al., “Localization and Recognition of Dynamic Hand Gestures Based on Hierarchy of Manifold Classifiers,” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, May 25-27, 2015, vol. XL-5/W6, pp. 1-8. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018,127 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,383, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 66 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 27 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,207, filed Sep. 20, 2019, 76 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 42 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,427, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 95 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 73 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,454, filed May 8, 2018, 19 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 30 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,207, filed Sep. 20, 2019, 91 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,279, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 45 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,279, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 58 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,435, filed Nov. 17, 2017, 70 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 15 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/505,836, filed Oct. 3, 2014, 52 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 11 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,072, filed Jul. 25, 2017, 36 Pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,998, filed Mar. 14, 2019, 33 Pages. |
| Fong H.C., et al., “PepperGram With Interactive Control,” 22nd International Conference Onvirtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), Oct. 17, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Gallina A., et al., “Surface EMG Biofeedback,” Surface Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Applications, 2016, pp. 485-500. |
| Ghasemzadeh H., et al., “A Body Sensor Network With Electromyogram and Inertial Sensors: Multimodal nterpretation of Muscular Activities,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Mar. 2010, vol. 14 (2), pp. 198-206. |
| Gopura R.A.R.C., et al., “A Human Forearm and Wrist Motion Assist Exoskeleton Robot With EMG-Based Fuzzy-Neuro Control,” Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Oct. 19-22, 2008, 6 pages. |
| Gourmelon L., et al., “Contactless Sensors for Surface Electromyography,” Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, NY, Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 2006, pp. 2514-2517. |
| Hauschild M., et al., “A Virtual Reality Environment for Designing and Fitting Neural Prosthetic Limbs,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Mar. 2007, vol. 15 (1), pp. 9-15. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/017799, dated May 16, 2014, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/037863, dated Aug. 21, 2014, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043693, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 7 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043791, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 9 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/031114, dated Nov. 19, 2020, 16 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/049094, dated Mar. 11, 2021, 24 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/052151, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 9 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/017799, dated Sep. 3, 2015, 8 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/037863, dated Nov. 26, 2015, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/052143, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/067443, dated Jun. 9, 2016, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2015/015675, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 8 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043686, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043792, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 8 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/056768, dated Apr. 30, 2020, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/061409, dated May 28, 2020, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015174, dated Aug. 6, 2020, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015183, dated Aug. 6, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 10 pages. |
| Al-Jumaily A., et al., “Electromyogram(EMG) Driven System based Virtual Reality for Prosthetic and Rehabilitation Devices,” Proceedings Of the 11th Internationalconference On Information Integration Andweb-Based Applications & Services, Jan. 1, 2009, pp. 582-586. |
| Al-Mashhadany Y.I., “Inverse Kinematics Problem (IKP) of 6-DOF Manipulator By Locally Recurrent Neural Networks (LRNNs),” Management and Service Science (MASS), International Conference on Management and Service Science., IEEE, Aug. 24, 2010, 5 pages. |
| Al-Timemy A.H., et al., “Improving the Performance Against Force Variation of EMG Controlled Multifunctional Upper-Limb Prostheses for Transradial Amputees,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Jun. 2016, vol. 24 (6), 12 Pages. |
| Arkenbout E.A., et al., “Robust Hand Motion Tracking through Data Fusion of 5DT Data Glove and Nimble VR Kinect Camera Measurements,” Sensors, 2015, vol. 15, pp. 31644-31671. |
| Benko H., et al., “Enhancing Input On and Above the Interactive Surface with Muscle Sensing,” The ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS), Nov. 23-25, 2009, pp. 93-100. |
| Berenzweig A., et al., “Wearable Devices and Methods for Improved Speech Recognition,” U.S. Appl. No. 16/785,680, filed Feb. 10, 2020, 67 pages. |
| Boyali A., et al., “Spectral Collaborative Representation based Classification for Hand Gestures Recognition on Electromyography Signals,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2016, vol. 24, pp. 11-18. |
| Brownlee J., “Finite State Machines (FSM): Finite State Machines as a Control Technique in Artificial Intelligence (Al),” FSM, Jun. 2002, 12 pages. |
| Cannan J., et al., “A Wearable Sensor Fusion Armband for Simple Motion Control and Selection for Disabled and Non-Disabled Users,” Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference, IEEE, Sep. 12, 2012, pp. 216-219, XP032276745. |
| Cheng J., et al., “A Novel Phonology- and Radical-Coded Chinese Sign Language Recognition Framework Using Accelerometer and Surface Electromyography Sensors,” Sensors, 2015, vol. 15, pp. 23303-23324. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) for European Patent Application No. 17835112.8, dated Dec. 14, 2020, 6 Pages. |
| Communication Pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC, Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 14753949.8, dated Sep. 30, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,072, inventors Patrick; Kaifosh et al., filed on Jul. 25, 2017. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,435, inventors Ning; Guo et al., filed on Nov. 17, 2017. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, inventors Stephen; Lake et al., filed on Jan. 29, 2018. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, inventors Adam; Berenzweig et al., filed on May 8, 2018. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,998, inventors Patrick; Kaifosh et al., filed on Mar. 14, 2019. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,383, inventors Adam; Berenzweig et al., filed on Aug. 30, 2019. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,427, inventors Adam; Berenzweig et al., filed on Aug. 30, 2019. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 44 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,998, filed Mar. 14, 2019,43 pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,383, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 94 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,427, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 93 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,207, filed Sep. 20, 2019, 67 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/505,836, filed Oct. 3, 2014, 59 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,435, filed Nov. 17, 2017, 24 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 54 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,384, filed May 8, 2018, 44 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,454, filed May 8, 2018, 45 Pages. |
| Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 93 Pages. |
| Corazza S., et al.,“ A Markerless Motion Capture System to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics: Visual Hull and Simulated Annealing Approach,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Jul. 2006, vol. 34 (6), pp. 1019-1029, [Retrieved on Dec. 11, 2019], 11 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6999610_A_Markerless_Motion_Capture_System_to_Study_Musculoskeletal_Biomechanics_Visual_Hull_ and_Simulated_Annealing_Approach. |
| Costanza E., et al., “EMG as a Subtle Input Interface for Mobile Computing,” Mobile HCI, LNCS 3160, 2004, pp. 126-130. |
| Costanza E., et al., “Toward Subtle Intimate Interfaces for Mobile Devices Using an EMG Controller,” CHI, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 2-7, 2005, pp. 481-489. |
| Csapo A.B., et al., “Evaluation of Human-Myo Gesture Control Capabilities in Continuous Search and Select Dperations,” 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, Oct. 16-18, 2016, pp. 000415-000420. |
| Davoodi R., et al., “Development of a Physics-Based Target Shooting Game to Train Amputee Users of Multi joint Upper Limb Prostheses,” Presence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012, vol. 21 (1), pp. 85-95. |
| Delis A.L., et al., “Development of a Myoelectric Controller Based on Knee Angle Estimation,” Biodevices, International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices, Jan. 17, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Diener L., et al., “Direct Conversion From Facial Myoelectric Signals to Speech Using Deep Neural Networks,” International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Oct. 1, 2015, 7 pages. |
| DING I-J., et al., “HMM with Improved Feature Extraction-Based Feature Parameters for Identity Recognition of Gesture Command Operators by Using a Sensed Kinect-Data Stream,” Neurocomputing, 2017, vol. 262, pp. 108-119. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 19861903.3, dated Oct. 12, 2021, 2 pages. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 19863248.1, dated Oct. 19, 2021, 2 pages. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 19868789.9, dated May 9, 2022, 9 pages. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 19890394.0, dated Apr. 29, 2022, 9 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18879156.0, dated Mar. 12, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19743717.1, dated Mar. 3, 2021, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19744404.5, dated Mar. 29, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19799947.7, dated May 26, 2021, 10 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17835111.0, dated Nov. 21, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17835112.8, dated Feb. 5, 2020, 17 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17835140.9, dated Nov. 26, 2019, 10 Pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18869441.8, dated Nov. 17, 2020, 20 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 10, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 2 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2020 for U.S. ApplicationNo. U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,446, filed Oct. 4, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 18, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,279, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 42 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 19, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,427, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 22 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 19, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,409, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 36 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 20, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,419, filed Apr. 19, 2019, 28 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 23, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 23, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,072, filed Jul. 25, 2017, 26 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/257,979, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 22 Pages. |
| Office action for European Application No. 17835112.8, dated Feb. 11, 2022, 11 Pages. |
| Office Action for European Patent Application No. 19743717.1, dated Apr. 11, 2022, 10 pages. |
| Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 18879156.0, dated Dec. 7, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Picard R.W., et al., “Affective Wearables,” Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Cambridge, Ma, USA, Oct. 13-14, 1997, pp. 90-97. |
| Preinterview First Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/785,680, filed Feb. 10, 2020, 90 Pages. |
| Rekimoto J., “GestureWrist and GesturePad: Unobtrusive Wearable Interaction Devices,” ISWC Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2001, 7 pages. |
| Saponas T.S., et al., “Demonstrating the Feasibility of Using Forearm Electromyography for Muscle-Computer Interfaces,” CHI Proceedings, Physiological Sensing for Input, Apr. 5-10, 2008, pp. 515-524. |
| Saponas T.S., et al., “Enabling Always-Available Input with Muscle-Computer Interfaces,” Conference: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 7, 2009, pp. 167-176. |
| Saponas T.S., et al., “Making Muscle-Computer Interfaces More Practical,” CHI, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Apr. 10-15, 2010, 4 pages. |
| Sartori M., et al., “Neural Data-Driven Musculoskeletal Modeling for Personalized Neurorehabilitation Technologies,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, May 5, 2016, vol. 63 (5), pp. 879-893. |
| Sato M., et al., “Touche: Enhancing Touch Interaction on Humans, Screens, Liquids, and Everyday Objects,” CHI, Austin, Texas, May 5-10, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Sauras-Perez P., et al., “A Voice and Pointing Gesture Interaction System for Supporting Human Spontaneous Decisions in Autonomous Cars,” Clemson University, All Dissertations, May 2017, 174 pages. |
| Shen S., et al., “I Am a Smartwatch and I Can Track My User's Arm,” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, MobiSys, Jun. 25-30, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Son M., et al., “Evaluating the Utility of Two Gestural Discomfort Evaluation Methods,” PLOS One, Apr. 19, 2017, 21 pages. |
| Strbac M., et al., “Microsoft Kinect-Based Artificial Perception System for Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation Assisted Grasping,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, BioMed Research International [online], 2014, Article No. 740469, 13 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/740469. |
| Torres T., “Myo Gesture Control Armband,” PCMag, Jun. 8, 2015, 9 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2485462,00.asp. |
| Ueno A., et al., “A Capacitive Sensor System for Measuring Laplacian Electromyogram through Cloth: A Pilot Study,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Cite Internationale, Lyon, France, Aug. 23-26, 2007, pp. 5731-5734. |
| Ueno A., et al., “Feasibility of Capacitive Sensing of Surface Electromyographic Potential through Cloth,” Sensors and Materials, 2012, vol. 24 (6), pp. 335-346. |
| Valero-Cuevas F.J., et al., “Computational Models for Neuromuscular Function,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2009, vol. 2, NIH Public Access Author Manuscript [online], Jun. 16, 2011 [Retrieved on Jul. 29, 2019], 52 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116649/. |
| Wittevrongel B., et al., “Spatiotemporal Beamforming: A Transparent and Unified Decoding Approach to Synchronous Visual Brain-Computer Interfacing,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, Nov. 15, 2017, vol. 11, Article No. 330, 13 Pages. |
| Wodzinski M., et al., “Sequential Classification of Palm Gestures Based on A* Algorithm and MLP Neural Network for Quadrocopter Control,” Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2017, vol. 24 (2), pp. 265-276. |
| Xiong A., et al., “A Novel HCI based on EMG and IMU,” Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Phuket, Thailand, Dec. 7-11, 2011, pp. 2653-2657. |
| Xu Z., et al., “Hand Gesture Recognition and Virtual Game Control Based on 3D Accelerometer and EMG Sensors,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, D211 Sanibel Island, Florida, Feb. 8-11, 2009, pp. 401-406. |
| Xue Y., et al., “Multiple Sensors Based Hand Motion Recognition Using Adaptive Directed Acyclic Graph,” Applied Sciences, MDPI, 2017, vol. 7 (358), pp. 1-14. |
| Yang Z., et al., “Surface EMG Based Handgrip Force Predictions Using Gene Expression Programming,” Neurocomputing, 2016, vol. 207, pp. 568-579. |
| Zacharaki E.I., et al., “Spike Pattern Recognition by Supervised Classification in Low Dimensional Embedding Space,” Brain Informatics, 2016, vol. 3, pp. 73-83. |
| Zhang X., et al., “A Framework for Hand Gesture Recognition Based on Accelerometer and EMG Sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, Nov. 2011, vol. 41 (6), pp. 1064-1076. |
| Koerner M.D., “Design and Characterization of the Exo-Skin Haptic Device: A Novel Tendon Actuated Textile Hand Exoskeleton,” Abstract of thesis for Drexel University Masters Degree [online], Nov. 2, 2017, 5 pages, Retrieved fom the Internet: URL: https://dialog.proquest.com/professional/docview/1931047627?accountid=153692. |
| Lee D.C., et al., “Motion and Force Estimation System of Human Fingers,” Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, 2011, vol. 17 (10), pp. 1014-1020. |
| Li Y., et al., “Motor Function Evaluation of Hemiplegic Upper-Extremities Using Data Fusion from Wearable Inertial and Surface EMG Sensors,” Sensors, MDPI, 2017, vol. 17 (582), pp. 1-17. |
| Lopes J., et al., “Hand/Arm Gesture Segmentation by Motion Using IMU and EMG Sensing,” ScienceDirect, Jun. 27-30, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 107-113. |
| Marcard T.V., et al., “Sparse Inertial Poser: Automatic 3D Human Pose Estimation from Sparse IMUs,” arxiv.org, Computer Graphics Forum, 2017, vol. 36 (2), 12 pages, XP080759137. |
| Martin H., et al., “A Novel Approach of Prosthetic Arm Control using Computer Vision, Biosignals, and Motion Capture,” IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotic Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies (CIR2AT), 2014, 5 pages. |
| McIntee S.S., “A Task Model of Free-Space Movement-Based Geastures,” Dissertation, Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University, Computer Science, 2016, 129 pages. |
| Mendes Jr.J.J.A., et al., “Sensor Fusion and Smart Sensor in Sports and Biomedical Applications,” Sensors, 2016, vol. 16 (1569), pp. 1-31. |
| Mohamed O.H., “Homogeneous Cognitive Based Biometrics for Static Authentication,” Dissertation submitted to University of Victoria, Canada, 2010, [last accessed Oct. 11, 2019], 149 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1828/321. |
| Morris D., et al., “Emerging Input Technologies for Always-Available Mobile Interaction,” Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2010, vol. 4 (4), pp. 245-316. |
| Naik G.R., et al., “Source Separation and Identification issues in Bio Signals: A Solution using Blind Source Separation,” Chapter 4 of Recent Advances in Biomedical Engineering, Intech, 2009, 23 pages. |
| Naik G.R., et al., “Real-Time Hand Gesture Identification for Human Computer Interaction Based on ICA of Surface Electromyogram,” IADIS International Conference Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction, 2007, pp. 83-90. |
| Naik G.R., et al., “Subtle Hand Gesture Identification for HCI Using Temporal Decorrelation Source Separation BSS of Surface EMG,” Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications, IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 30-37. |
| Negro F., et al., “Multi-Channel Intramuscular and Surface EMG Decomposition by Convolutive Blind Source Separation,” Journal of Neural Engineering, Feb. 29, 2016, vol. 13, 18 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 32 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 66 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,446, filed Oct. 4, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,435, filed Nov. 17, 2017, 32 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,072, filed Jul. 25, 2017, 59 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/424,144, filed May 28, 2019, 11 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 11 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,207, filed Sep. 20, 2019, 51 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,409, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 71 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,207, filed Sep. 20, 2019, 35 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,279, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 38 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 46 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,419, filed Apr. 19, 2019, 26 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 16, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,384, filed May 8, 2018, 13 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 16, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 12 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/577,207, filed Sep. 20, 2019, 32 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,454, filed May 8, 2018, 59 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,454, filed May 8, 2018, 41 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,435, filed Nov. 17, 2017, 35 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,342, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 16 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,383, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 53 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,427, filed Aug. 30, 2019, 52 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/505,836, filed Oct. 3, 2014, 54 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,446, filed Oct. 4, 2019, 28 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 24, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,998, filed Mar. 14, 2019, 20 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 26, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,998, filed Mar. 14, 2019, 60 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,279, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 44 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/257,979, filed Jan. 25, 2019, 63 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,072, filed Jul. 25, 2017, 99 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,430, filed May 8, 2018, 57 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/593,446, filed Oct. 4, 2019, 43 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/505,836, filed Oct. 3, 2014, 37 Pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/882,858, filed Jan. 29, 2018, 22 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,454, filed May 8, 2018, 24 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,384, filed May 8, 2018, 39 Pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/424,144, filed May 28, 2019, 28 Pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015238, dated Aug. 6, 2020, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/028299, dated Dec. 10, 2020, 11 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/034173, dated Dec. 10, 2020, 9 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/046351, dated Feb. 25, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/052131, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/054716, dated Apr. 15, 2021, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/061759, dated May 27, 2021, 12 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/063587, dated Jun. 10, 2021, 13 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2020/049274, dated Mar. 17, 2022, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/052143, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 8 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/067443, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/015675, dated May 27, 2015, 9 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043686, dated Oct. 6, 2017, 9 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043693, dated Oct. 6, 2017, 7 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043791, dated Oct. 5, 2017, 10 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/056768, dated Jan. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/061409, dated Mar. 12, 2019, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/063215, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 17 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015167, dated May 21, 2019, 7 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015174, dated May 21, 2019, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015244, dated May 16, 2019, 8 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/020065, dated May 16, 2019, 10 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/028299, dated Aug. 9, 2019, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/031114, dated Dec. 20, 2019, 18 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/034173, dated Sep. 18, 2019, 10 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/037302, dated Oct. 11, 2019, 13 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/042579, dated Oct. 31, 2019, 8 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/046351, dated Nov. 7, 2019, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/049094, dated Jan. 9, 2020, 27 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/052131, dated Dec. 6, 2019, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/052151, dated Jan. 15, 2020, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/054716, dated Dec. 20, 2019, 11 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/061759, dated Jan. 29, 2020, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/063587, dated Mar. 25, 2020, 16 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/025735, dated Jun. 22, 2020, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/025797, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/049274, dated Feb. 1, 2021, 17 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/061392, dated Mar. 12, 2021, 12 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043792, dated Oct. 5, 2017, 9 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015134, dated May 15, 2019, 11 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015180, dated May 28, 2019, 10 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015183, dated May 3, 2019, 8 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015238, dated May 16, 2019, 8 Pages. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for International Application No. PCT/US2019/031114, dated Aug. 6, 2019, 7 pages. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for International Application No. PCT/US2019/049094, dated Oct. 24, 2019, 2 Pages. |
| Jiang H., “Effective and Interactive Interpretation of Gestures by Individuals with Mobility Impairments,” Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance, Purdue University Graduate School, Graduate School Form 30, Updated on Jan. 15, 2015, 24 pages. |
| Kainz et al., “Approach to Hand Tracking and Gesture Recognition Based on Depth-Sensing Cameras and EMG Monitoring,” Acta Informatica Pragensia, vol. 3, Jan. 1, 2014, pp. 104-112, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://aip.vse.cz/pdfs/aip/2014/01/08.pdf. |
| Kawaguchi J., et al., “Estimation of Finger Joint Angles Based on Electromechanical Sensing of Wrist Shape,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Sep. 2017, vol. 25 (9), pp. 1409-1418. |
| Kim H., et al., “Real-Time Human Pose Estimation and Gesture Recognition from Depth Images Using Superpixels and SVM Classifier,” Sensors, 2015, vol. 15, pp. 12410-12427. |
| Kipke D.R., et al., “Silicon-Substrate Intracortical Microelectrode Arrays for Long-Term Recording of Neuronal Spike Activity in Cerebral Cortex,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Jun. 2003, vol. 11 (2), 5 pages. Retrieved on Oct. 7, 2019 [Jul. 10, 2019] Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.ece.uvic.ca/-bctill/papers/neurimp/Kipke_etal_2003_01214707.pdf. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200310539 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62826478 | Mar 2019 | US |
