Methods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8974531
  • Patent Number
    8,974,531
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 30, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 10, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis into a space between two vertebrae involves inserting the prosthesis partway into the space under constraint to prevent endplates of the prosthesis from articulating, releasing the prosthesis from constraint, and inserting the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space. In some embodiments, the method involves grasping the prosthesis with a grasping device to insert the prosthesis partway under constraint, loosing the grasping device to release the prosthesis from constraint, and pushing the prosthesis farther into the disc space using the grasping device and/or one or more separate pusher devices. A system includes a grasping device, at least one separate pushing device, and optionally a vertebral spreading device and/or a vertebral midline indicator device.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to medical devices and methods. More specifically, the invention relates to intervertebral disc prostheses.


Back pain takes an enormous toll on the health and productivity of people around the world. According to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, approximately 80 percent of Americans will experience back pain at some time in their life. In just the year 2000, approximately 26 million visits were made to physicians' offices due to back problems in the United States. On any one day, it is estimated that 5% of the working population in America is disabled by back pain.


One common cause of back pain is injury, degeneration and/or dysfunction of one or more intervertebral discs. Intervertebral discs are the soft tissue structures located between each of the thirty-three vertebral bones that make up the vertebral (spinal) column. Essentially, the discs allow the vertebrae to move relative to one another. The vertebral column and discs are vital anatomical structures, in that they form a central axis that supports the head and torso, allow for movement of the back, and protect the spinal cord, which passes through the vertebrae in proximity to the discs.


Discs often become damaged due to wear and tear or acute injury. For example, discs may bulge (herniate), tear, rupture, degenerate or the like. A bulging disc may press against the spinal cord or a nerve exiting the spinal cord, causing “radicular” pain (pain in one or more extremities caused by impingement of a nerve root). Degeneration or other damage to a disc may cause a loss of “disc height,” meaning that the natural space between two vertebrae decreases. Decreased disc height may cause a disc to bulge, facet loads to increase, two vertebrae to rub together in an unnatural way and/or increased pressure on certain parts of the vertebrae and/or nerve roots, thus causing pain. In general, chronic and acute damage to intervertebral discs is a common source of back related pain and loss of mobility.


When one or more damaged intervertebral discs cause a patient pain and discomfort, surgery is often required. Traditionally, surgical procedures for treating intervertebral discs have involved discectomy (partial or total removal of a disc), with or without fusion of the two vertebrae adjacent to the disc. Fusion of the two vertebrae is achieved by inserting bone graft material between the two vertebrae such that the two vertebrae and the graft material grow together. Oftentimes, pins, rods, screws, cages and/or the like are inserted between the vertebrae to act as support structures to hold the vertebrae and graft material in place while they permanently fuse together. Although fusion often treats the back pain, it reduces the patient's ability to move, because the back cannot bend or twist at the fused area. In addition, fusion increases stresses at adjacent levels of the spine, potentially accelerating degeneration of these discs.


In an attempt to treat disc related pain without fusion, an alternative approach has been developed, in which a movable, implantable, artificial intervertebral disc (or “disc prosthesis”) is inserted between two vertebrae. A number of different intervertebral disc prostheses are currently being developed. For example, the inventors of the present invention have developed disc prostheses described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/855,817 and 10/855,253, previously incorporated by reference. Other examples of intervertebral disc prostheses are the LINK® SB CHARITÉ™ disc prosthesis (provided by DePuy Spine, Inc.) MOBIDISK™ disc prosthesis (provided by LDR Medical), the BRYAN™ cervical disc prosthesis (provided by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.), the PRODISC™ disc prosthesis or PRODISC-C™ disc prosthesis (from Synthes Stratec, Inc.), and the PCM™ disc prosthesis (provided by Cervitech, Inc.).


To insert an artificial intervertebral disc prosthesis, and indeed for performing most disc-related surgeries, it is typically necessary to gain access to the disc and the intervertebral space from an anterior to posterior direction (i.e., through the front of the patient), to avoid coming in contact with the spinal cord. Thus, surgical procedures on a disc are typically approached anteriorly through the neck or abdomen, depending on which disc (or discs) is being repaired. Methods for inserting a disc prosthesis generally involve removing the damaged disc, preparing the surfaces of the two vertebral bones to receive the prosthesis, spreading the two vertebrae apart using one or more spreading devices, and inserting the prosthesis into the space between the two vertebrae. Examples of such methods are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,478,800, 6,235,030, 6,652,533, 6,689,132, 6,261,296 and 6,666,866, and in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2001/0031969, 2001/0029377, 2003/0153916, 2002/0198532, 2004/0024407, 2003/0216737, 2003/0204261, 2003/0135220 and 2003/0014114. Due to the invasive nature of such procedures, one important goal is to reduce invasiveness, thus causing as little trauma to tissues surrounding the surgical site as possible.


The main drawback of currently available methods for inserting intervertebral disc prostheses is that they require a larger amount of spreading apart (or “distraction”) of the two vertebrae than is optimal. Over-distraction is necessary when using such methods because it is important to insert the disc prosthesis all the way into the disc space, to position the center of rotation of the prosthesis closer to the posterior portion of the vertebrae than to the anterior portion. This allows the vertebrae to move as they were intended and avoids placing undue strain on the facet joints of the vertebrae or on other structures. To push a prosthesis toward the back of a disc space, however, it is typically necessary to spread the two vertebrae apart widely, since the anterior portion of the disc space is usually wider (or higher) than the posterior portion. In some methods, an artificial disc is placed by placing a first endplate into the space, placing a second endplate into the space, and then spreading the vertebrae wide enough to wedge a core in between the two endplates. In other methods, the vertebrae are spread apart as far as practicable, the whole prosthesis is inserted while one or more spreading devices are in place, and not until the prosthesis is completely inserted is the spreading device removed. In either case, as well as in other currently available methods, the two vertebrae adjacent the prosthesis are typically spread farther apart than would be desirable for a longer amount of time than would be desirable. In some cases, the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) is released, or “cut,” to enable sufficient distraction for disc placement.


Distracting vertebrae can damage muscles, ligaments, nerves and/or other tissues in and around the vertebral column. Such damage may actually cause the patient to experience as much, or even more, pain after surgery than was caused by the original disc problem.


Therefore, as the use of intervertebral disc prostheses increases, an increasing need exists for improved methods and apparatus for inserting such prostheses. Ideally, such intervertebral prosthesis insertion methods and devices would provide for insertion of a prosthesis a desired distance into an intervertebral space while reducing the need for intervertebral distraction, thus preventing or at least reducing trauma to surrounding tissues. Also ideally, such insertion methods and devices would be relatively simple and easy to use, thereby reducing the overall invasiveness of the procedure. At least some of these objectives will be met by the present invention.


2. Description of the Background Art


A number of exemplary intervertebral disc prostheses are listed above. Published US patent applications 2002/0035400A1 and 2002/0128715A1 describe disc implants which comprise opposing plates with a core between them over which the plates can slide. The core receives one or more central posts, which are carried by the plates and which locate in opposite ends of a central opening in the core. Such arrangements limit the load bearing area available between the plates and core.


Other patents related to intervertebral disc prostheses include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,759,766; 4,863,477; 4,997,432; 5,035,716; 5,071,437; 5,370,697; 5,401,269; 5,507,816; 5,534,030; 5,556,431; 5,674,296; 5,676,702; 5,702,450; 5,824,094; 5,865,846; 5,989,291; 6,001,130; 6,022,376; 6,039,763; 6,139,579; 6,156,067; 6,162,252; 6,315,797; 6,348,071; 6,368,350; 6,416,551; 6,592,624; 6,607,558 and 6,706,068. Other patent applications related to intervertebral disc prostheses include U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2003/0009224; 2003/0074076; 2003/0191536; 2003/0208271; 2003/0135277; 2003/0199982; 2001/0016773 and 2003/0100951. Other related patents include WO 01/01893A1, EP 1344507, EP 1344506, EP 1250898, EP 1306064, EP 1344508, EP 1344493, EP 1417940, EP 1142544, and EP 0333990.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally provides methods for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis, as well as devices and systems for performing the methods. One advantage of these improved methods is that a disc prosthesis may be inserted with minimal or reduced intervertebral distraction, thus avoiding trauma to tissues in and around the insertion site. Reduced distraction is generally achieved by inserting a prosthesis into an intervertebral space while allowing endplates of the prosthesis to articulate during at least part of the insertion process. For the purposes of this application, to “articulate” means to move relative to another structure. Thus, allowing endplates of an intervertebral prosthesis to articulate means that endplates are free to move relative to each other, relative to a core of the prosthesis, relative to a ball and socket joint of the prosthesis, relative to a mobile or fixed center of rotation of the prosthesis and/or the like. Although the following description often focuses on disc prostheses having two endplates and a core, various embodiments of the insertion method may be applied to any other intervertebral disc prosthesis. Articulation of the endplates during insertion allows the prosthesis to be pushed posteriorly into a disc space without excessive intervertebral distraction or significant forces being applied to the vertebrae, thus achieving desirable positioning of the prosthesis while avoiding trauma to surrounding muscles, ligaments, nerves and the like.


In one aspect of the present invention, a method of inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae involves inserting the prosthesis partway into the space under constraint to prevent endplates of the prosthesis from articulating, releasing the prosthesis from constraint, and inserting the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space. As mentioned above, in some embodiments, the endplates of the constrained prosthesis are prevented from articulating about a core of the prosthesis, while the endplates of the unconstrained prosthesis are generally free to articulate about the core to help the prosthesis conform to the space between the two vertebrae. In alternative embodiments, the unconstrained endplates may be free to articulate about a ball and socket joint or other structure.


In one embodiment, inserting the prosthesis partway under constraint involves grasping the endplates with an insertion tool such that they cannot move relative to the core and pushing the prosthesis partway into the space using the insertion tool. In such embodiments, releasing the prosthesis from constraint may involve loosening the insertion tool. In some embodiments, the loosened insertion tool may then be used to insert the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the intervertebral space. Additionally, or alternatively, a separate pusher tool may be used to insert the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space.


In some embodiments, inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the space between the vertebrae involves inserting the prosthesis less than halfway into the space. In one embodiment, for example, the constrained prosthesis is inserted about one third of the way into the space and then subsequently inserted farther into the space. In alternative embodiments, the constrained prosthesis may be pushed more than halfway into the space, less than one third of the way into the space, or any other suitable distance into the space. The unconstrained prosthesis is then inserted any desired distance farther into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis is inserted sufficiently far into the space that a center of rotation of the prosthesis is closer to the posterior edges of the vertebrae than to the anterior edges of the vertebrae.


In some embodiments, the prosthesis is inserted in approximately an anterior to posterior direction. In alternative embodiments, the prosthesis may be inserted in an anterolateral-to-posterior direction, lateral-to-lateral direction or posterior-to-anterior direction. Typically, inserting the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space involves pushing the prosthesis into the space. In other embodiments, however, techniques other than pushing may be used to insert the prosthesis, such as pulling. In some embodiments, pushing the prosthesis farther into the space involves individually pushing upper and lower endplates of the prosthesis. Alternatively, or additionally, the upper and lower endplates of the prosthesis may be simultaneously pushed into the intervertebral space. In various embodiments, individual and simultaneous endplate pushing may be performed using the grasping device, a separate pusher device, or both.


In some embodiments, the method also includes inserting a vertebral spacing device at least partway into the space and manipulating the spacing device to increase a height of the space. An example of such a spacing device is described by the assignees of the present application in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000171, filed Jan. 26, 2004, the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The spacing step is typically performed before inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the intervertebral space comprises sliding the prosthesis between two opposing jaws of the spacing device. In such an embodiment, inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the space may optionally further involve sliding at least one fin on at least one outer surface of the endplates through at least one corresponding slot in the opposing jaws. In one embodiment, such a fin (or fins) may then be slid into a corresponding slot formed in one of the vertebrae.


Some embodiments also involve using a vertebral midpoint indicator device to locate a midpoint of at least one of the two vertebrae, and marking the midpoint on one or both of the two vertebrae. An example of a midline indicator device is described by the assignees of the present application in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000170, filed Jan. 26, 2004, the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Midline finding and marking are typically performed before inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, locating the midpoint involves inserting the vertebral midpoint indicator device into the space between the vertebrae and imaging the midpoint indicator device using a radiographic imaging device.


In another aspect of the present invention, a method of inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae involves sliding the prosthesis partway into the space between the vertebrae between two opposing jaws of a spacing device, removing the spacing device from the space to release the prosthesis from constraint, and pushing the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space while allowing endplates of the prosthesis to articulate. In this method, the endplates of the prosthesis are constrained from articulating when the prosthesis is disposed between the jaws. Again, in some embodiments, the unconstrained endplates articulate about a core of the prosthesis, while in alternative embodiments they may articulate about a ball and socket joint or other structure. Such a method may optionally further include inserting the spacing device at least partway into the space and manipulating the spacing device to increase a height of the space. Any of the additional or alternative features described above may also be applied in various embodiments.


In another aspect of the present invention, a device for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae includes: an elongate rigid shaft having a proximal end and a distal end; an adjustable grasping member coupled with the distal end for releasably grasping endplates of the intervertebral prosthesis; and an actuator disposed near the proximal end of the shaft and coupled with the grasping member for adjusting the grasping member to grasp and release the prosthesis. The grasping member is adapted to grasp the prosthesis such that the endplates are constrained from articulating and such that the outer diameter of the grasping member does not extend beyond a largest diameter of the endplates. Additionally, the grasping member is adapted for pushing the prosthesis into the space between the two vertebrae either while grasping the prosthesis or after releasing the prosthesis.


In some embodiments, the grasping member comprises movable opposing jaws adapted to simultaneously grasp inner rims of the endplates. Such a grasping member may, for example, be coupled with the actuator via at least one rod extending through the shaft. For example, the grasping member may include a first half coupled with a first movable rod extending from the actuator and a second half coupled with a second movable rod extending from the actuator. In some embodiments, the actuator comprises a thumb screw adapted to move the first and second rods closer together and farther apart by turning the thumb screw in opposite directions. In alternative embodiments, the actuator may include, but is not limited to, a trigger, tongs and a movable handle. In a number of embodiments, the device is shaped to pass between two opposable jaws of a vertebral spacing device disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae. Also in some embodiments, the grasping member may be adapted to push the endplates either simultaneously or individually into the space.


In another aspect of the present invention, a system for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae includes a prosthesis grasping device for grasping the prosthesis and pushing the prosthesis at least partway into the space and at least one prosthesis pusher device for pushing the prosthesis farther into the space. The grasping device is similar to the device described immediately above and may include any of the described features. The pusher device may include: an elongate shaft having a proximal end and a distal end; a concave pusher portion disposed at the distal end, the pusher portion adapted to push the endplates either simultaneously or individually into the space; and a handle disposed at the proximal end.


In some embodiments, the system further includes a vertebral spacing device for increasing a height of the space between the two vertebrae. An example of such a spacing device is described in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000171, which was previously incorporated by reference. In such embodiments, the grasping member is adapted to slide through the vertebral spacing device disposed between two adjacent vertebrae. Optionally, the pusher device may also be adapted to slide through the spacing device.


The system may optionally further include a vertebral body midline indicator device for locating a midline on a vertebral body of at least one of the two vertebrae. An example of a midline indicator device is described in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000170, which was previously incorporated by reference.


These and other aspects and embodiments will be described in further detail below, with reference to the drawing figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1E demonstrate a method for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are top views of a grasping device for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2C is a side view of the distal end of the device in FIGS. 2A and 2B.



FIG. 3 is a top view of a pusher device for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 4A-4E are various views of a spreader device for distracting two adjacent vertebrae for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 demonstrates the spreading action of the spreader device in FIGS. 4A-4E.



FIGS. 6A-6D are various views of a vertebral body midline indicator device according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 7A and 7B demonstrate indication of vertebral midline using the device in FIGS. 6A-6D.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIGS. 1A-1E, in one embodiment a method for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis 104 into an intervertebral space IS between two adjacent vertebrae V first involves inserting the disc prosthesis 104 partway into the space IS while the prosthesis 104 is constrained (FIG. 1A). By “constrained” it is meant that endplates 106 of the prosthesis 104 are not free to articulate (move) about a core 112 (FIGS. 1B-1E) of the prosthesis 104. To insert the prosthesis 104 partway under constraint, an insertion device 102 may be used. Such an insertion device 102 may suitably include a grasping member 110 coupled with an elongate shaft 108. At an end opposite the grasping member 110 (not shown), the insertion device 102 may include a handle, an actuator to control the grasping member 110 and/or any other suitable features, some of which are described further below.


The prosthesis 104 may be inserted as far into the intervertebral space IS under constraint as is desired. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis 104 is inserted under constraint approximately one-third of the way into the space IS. In other embodiments, the prosthesis 104 may be inserted less than one-third of the way, closer to one-half of the way, or any other suitable distance into the space IS.


As shown in FIG. 1B, once the prosthesis 104 is inserted partway under constraint, the insertion device 102 may be removed, thus releasing the prosthesis 104 from constraint. From this point forward, the endplates 106 of the prosthesis 104 are free to move about the prosthesis core 112. Examples of such a prosthesis 104 with endplates 106 and core 112 are described by the assignees of the present application in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/855,817 and 10/855,253, previously incorporated by reference, although any other suitable prosthesis may be used in various embodiments.


Referring now to FIGS. 1C-1E, in some embodiments the insertion device 102 may be used to push the unconstrained prosthesis 104 farther into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, one or more separate pusher devices (not shown) may be used in addition to or instead of the insertion device 102 for pushing the prosthesis 104 farther into the space IS. FIGS. 1C and 1D demonstrate that in one embodiment the grasping member 110 of the insertion device 102 is adapted to push individually against the upper (FIG. 1C) and lower (FIG. 1D) endplates 106. As shown in FIG. 1E, the grasping member 110 may also be adapted to push simultaneously against the upper and lower endplates 106, thus pushing the prosthesis 104 as a unit farther into the intervertebral space IS.


By inserting the prosthesis 104 farther into the space IS while it is unconstrained, thus allowing the endplates 106 to articulate about the core 112, the method reduces the need for increasing the height of the intervertebral space IS by distracting the vertebrae V away from each other. Because the endplates 106 are free to articulate, the prosthesis 104 is better able to conform to the intervertebral space IS, thus reducing trauma to the vertebrae V and also limiting trauma to surrounding structures caused by over-distraction.


The unconstrained prosthesis 104 may be inserted as far into the intervertebral space IS as is desired. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis 104 is pushed far enough into the space IS so that a center of rotation of the prosthesis 104 is closer to a posterior edge P (FIG. 1E) of the vertebrae V than to an anterior edge A of the vertebrae V. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable insertion distance or depth may be used. Once a desired amount of insertion is achieved, the insertion device 102 is removed and the prosthesis 104 is in place between the two adjacent vertebrae V.


In various embodiments, the method just described may include fewer steps or additional steps. For example, in one embodiment, a spreader device is inserted between the two vertebrae V to spread them apart before inserting the constrained prosthesis 104. An example of such a spacing device is described in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000171, previously incorporated by reference. In such embodiments, the insertion device 102 is typically sized to fit between opposing jaws of the spreader device. When the prosthesis 104 is partially inserted, the spreader device is removed from the intervertebral space IS, and the prosthesis 104 is released from constraint and inserted the rest of the way into the space IS. Also in some embodiments, a midline indicator device may be used to facilitate the location of a midline on one or both of the two adjacent vertebrae V. An example of such a midline indicator device is described in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000170, previously incorporated by reference. Typically, the midline indicator is used before the disc prosthesis 104 is inserted. These and other steps or features may be included in various embodiments of the method without departing from the scope of the invention.


Referring now to FIGS. 2A-2C, one embodiment of an insertion device 120 for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis 140 suitably includes an elongate shaft 126, a grasping member 122 coupled with the distal end of the shaft 126, and a handle 128 at the proximal end of the shaft 120, including one or more actuators 130 for controlling movement of the grasping member 122. One or more rods 124 or other connectors extend from the grasping member 122 through the shaft 126 to the actuator 130. In the embodiment shown, for example, the grasping member 122 comprises two opposable tongs or jaws, which may be moved closer together or farther apart (double-headed arrows) via the actuator 130 and rods 124. The actuator 130 shown is a thumb screw. In alternative embodiments, scissor-type mechanisms, spring loaded tongs, a triggering mechanism or any other suitable grasping and actuating means may be used. Any suitable material or combination of materials may be used to manufacture the insertion device, including but not limited to stainless steel and/or other suitable metals.


As shown in FIG. 2B, the insertion device 120 may grasp a disc prosthesis 140 such that the grasping member 122 does not protrude beyond an outer edge 141 of the prosthesis 140. In other words, the grasping member 122 holds onto an inner portion of the prosthesis 140, so that it will not extend beyond the lateral edges 141 of the prosthesis 140. This configuration is advantageous during insertion, as the grasping member 122 is essentially out of the way, within the outer edge 141 of the prosthesis 140.



FIG. 2C is a side view of a distal end of the insertion device 120 shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. It is more readily seen that the disc prosthesis 140 includes a core 146 and two endplates 142. Each endplate 142 includes an inner rim 144 that contacts the core 146 and a fin 148 for enhancing attachment to vertebral bone. The grasping member 122 of the insertion device 120 grasps the inner rims 144 of the endplates 142, thus positioning it within the outer edges 141 of the endplates 142. Of course, in various embodiments of the methods described herein, any suitable alternative prosthesis may be used, as well as any suitable insertion device (or devices).


Referring now to FIG. 3, in some embodiments a separate pusher device 150 may be used to push an unconstrained prosthesis 140 farther into an intervertebral space. The pusher device 150 is typically constructed of stainless steel or other suitable metal and suitably includes an elongate shaft 152, a pusher member 154 at the distal end of the shaft 152, and a handle 158 at the proximal end of the shaft 152. The pusher member 154 includes a concave inner portion 156 for pushing against the inner rims 144 of endplates 142 of the prosthesis 140. The concave portion 156 may be tapered and/or rounded to facilitate pushing against upper and lower endplates 142 individually while also allowing for simultaneous pushing against both endplates 142. In alternative embodiments, the pusher device 150 may have any of a number of alternative configurations, shapes, sizes and the like. In some embodiments, multiple pusher devices 150 of different configurations and/or sizes are provided to allow a physician to select one or more desired devices 150.


Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4E, a spreader device 10 for spreading adjacent vertebrae to facilitate intervertebral disc prosthesis 30 insertion is shown. Again, the device 10 is described in greater detail in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000171, which was previously incorporated by reference. The spreader device 10 generally includes distally located opposable jaws 12, a slidable pusher member 45 and an actuator 15. The opposable jaws 12 are carried by arms 14 which form part of a scissors-type mechanism having a single hinge point 15. Handles 16 on the proximal end of the device are used to manipulate the opposable jaws 12. When the handles 16 are actuated, arms 14 translate the actuation motion to the single hinge point scissors type mechanism 15. This causes the opposable jaws 12 to open or close. The jaws 12 have opposing surfaces 18 formed with ribs 20 and transverse slots 22 which extend for the height of the jaws as seen in FIG. 4B. At their free ends, the jaws 12 are provided with relatively sharp tips or blades 24 having curved extremities 26.



FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate how the handles 14 are inclined relative to the jaws 12. Manipulation of the handles 16 by moving them causes the jaws 12 to open or close. Other embodiments include a double hinge instead of the single hinge 15 which would pivot the jaws apart from one another when the handles 16 are displaced towards one another.


The insertion device 10 illustrated in FIGS. 4A-4E is designed for placement of an intervertebral prosthetic disc 30. Such a prosthetic disc 30 comprises opposing endplates 32 which are located on opposite sides of a central core 34. The opposing endplates 32 articulate about the central core 34. The prosthetic disc 30 also comprises projecting fins 36 which are aligned with matching slots 40 in the vertebrae 38 during implantation. Typically slots 40 are saw cut into the vertebrae 38.


A method of inserting the intervertebral prosthesis is illustrated in FIGS. 4D and 5. In order to place the prosthesis 30, the vertebrae 38 are distracted by a distance sufficient for at least partial insertion of the prosthesis 30. To achieve this, the tips 24 of the opposable jaws 12 are inserted between the vertebrae 38 with the slots 22 in the opposable jaws 12 aligned with the slots in the vertebrae 40. The handles 16 are then manipulated to force the opposable jaws 12 apart which also forces the vertebrae 38 apart from one another, creating a gap. The prosthesis 30 is then inserted into the gap 42 between the opposable jaws 12 where it is held therein with fins 36 engaged with the corresponding slots 22. The prosthesis 30 is then slipped distally in the gap while being guided by the fins 36 cooperating with the slots 22. The prosthesis 30 is moved through the inter jaw gap and past the jaw tips 24 in order to locate the prosthesis 30 between the vertebrae 38 with fins 36 in the vertebral cut slots 40. The slots 22 in the opposable jaws 12 help to guide the fins 36 into the vertebral cut slots 40.



FIG. 4C illustrates the jaws 12 inclined towards one another, in the direction towards the tips 24. The gap 42 between the jaws 12 at the top is large enough for insertion of the prosthesis 30 between them at that point. Therefore, in an alternative method of placing the prosthesis, the prosthesis 30 may be located initially in the gap 42 and then it may be pushed down towards the tip 24, forcing the jaws 12 open and similarly forcing the vertebrae 38 apart from one another. A pusher 45 may be used to hold, position and drive the prosthesis 30 during the placement procedure. A force may be applied manually to pusher 45 or it may be tapped on the upper end to drive the prosthesis downward.


Alternatively, the prosthesis placement procedure may be modified so that the initial distraction of the vertebra 38 is achieved by manipulation of the handles 16 and then a force may be applied manually to the pusher 45 or it may be tapped in order to create the final intervertebral gap and placement of the prosthesis 30. The spreader device 10 serves both to facilitate insertion of the prosthesis 30 between the vertebrae 38 and also to ensure that the prosthesis 30 is accurately guided into position with its fins 36 lined up with the vertebral slots 40.



FIG. 5 shows in greater detail (solid-tipped arrows) the various motions involved in inserting the spreader device 10 into the intervertebral space and manipulating the handles 16 to force open the jaws 12 and thus increased the height of the intervertebral space between the two adjacent vertebrae 38. As mentioned above, use of this or other spreader devices 10 is optional and is not required in all embodiments.



FIGS. 6A-6D show another optional device for use in the insertion methods of the present invention. As mentioned above, a midline indicator device 210 such as the one shown is described in greater detail in PCT Patent Application Number 2004/000170, which was previously incorporated by reference. The midline indicator 210 suitably includes an elongate shaft 212 and a body 214 coupled with one end of the shaft 212. The shaft 212 may be made of one or more radiopaque materials, such as but not limited to stainless steel, titanium or the like. Alternatively, the shaft 212 may be radiolucent. The body 214 is made of one or more radiolucent materials, such as a polymer, so that it is not visible on radiographs. Embedded in the body 214 are two elongate radiopaque markers 216, also made of any suitable radiopaque material(s). The markers 216 are parallel to the shaft 212 and are located on opposite sides and equidistant from the shaft 212.



FIGS. 7A and 7B demonstrate a method for using the midline indicator to find a vertebral body midline 222. FIG. 7A shows, in anterior view, adjacent upper 218 and lower 220 vertebrae. To determine the midline 222, the surgeon uses the shaft 212 to insert the body 214 between the vertebrae 218, 220. The surgeon then attempts to position the shaft 212 at the vertebral midline 222, and a radiograph is taken of the vertebrae 218, 220 and indicator 210 from the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction. The surgeon then examines the radiograph to determine whether the markers 216 are equidistant laterally from the lateral osseous edges 223 of the vertebrae 218, 220—i.e., that the distance 225 is the same on both sides, and that the markers 216 are aligned with the pedicles.


Additionally, if the shaft 212 and markers 216 are properly aligned in the A-P direction, they will appear as dots on the radiograph. If the midline indicator 210 is turned, however, as is demonstrated by the dotted lines in FIG. 7B, the shaft 212 and markers 216 will show up as lines or stretched-out dots on the radiograph. The A-P direction of the radiograph is shown by 224, with misalignment of the indicator 210 shown by angles θ. By consulting one or more radiographs and manipulating the indicator 210, the surgeon positions the handle 212 of the indicator 210 at the vertebral midline 222. The surgeon may then make a mark 226 in one or more vertebrae 218, 220 to indicate the midline 222. The mark 226 may be made by any suitable means, such as by burning with an electrocautery device, marking with a marking pen, inserting a pin, or the like. After one or more midline marks 226 are made, the midline indicator 210 is removed and the disc prosthesis (not shown) is inserted. Again, the midline finding step is optional.


Although the foregoing is a complete and accurate description of the invention, any suitable modifications, additions or the like may be made to the various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, nothing described above should be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention as it is described in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae, the system comprising: an intervertebral prosthesis having two endplates which are movable with respect to one another, a core disposed between the two endplates, inner rims located on the two endplates and contacting the core, and fins for attachment to vertebral bone, the inner rims located between the two endplates and the fins located opposite the inner rims;a prosthesis grasping device comprising: an elongate rigid shaft having a proximal end and a distal end;an adjustable grasping member coupled with the distal end for releasably grasping the two endplates of the intervertebral prosthesis, the grasping member comprising movable opposing jaws configured to simultaneously grasp around the inner rims of the two endplates such that the endplates are constrained from articulating and such that an outer diameter of the grasping member does not extend beyond a largest diameter of the endplates; andan actuator disposed on and at least partially inside the shaft entirely between the proximal end and the distal end and coupled with the grasping member for adjusting the grasping member to grasp and release the prosthesis without moving the shaft.
  • 2. A system as in claim 1, wherein the grasping member is adapted to grasp the endplates such that they are prevented from articulating about the core of the prosthesis.
  • 3. A system as in claim 1, wherein the grasping member is coupled with the actuator via at least one rod extending through the shaft.
  • 4. A system as in claim 3, wherein the grasping member comprises: a first half coupled with a first movable rod extending from the actuator; anda second half coupled with a second movable rod extending from the actuator.
  • 5. A system as in claim 4, wherein the actuator comprises a thumb screw adapted to move the first and second rods closer together and farther apart by turning the thumb screw in opposite directions.
  • 6. A system as in claim 1, wherein the actuator is selected from the group consisting of a thumb screw, a trigger, tongs and a movable handle.
  • 7. A system as in claim 1, wherein the device is shaped to pass between two opposable jaws of a vertebral spacing device disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae.
  • 8. A system as in claim 1, wherein the grasping member is adapted to push the endplates simultaneously into the space.
  • 9. A system as in claim 1, further comprising: at least one prosthesis pusher device configured for engaging and pushing the prosthesis farther into the space.
  • 10. A system as in claim 9, wherein each pusher device comprises: an elongate shaft having a proximal end and a distal end;a concave pusher portion disposed at the distal end of the elongate shaft, the pusher portion adapted to push the endplates either simultaneously or individually into the space; anda handle disposed at the proximal end of the elongate shaft.
  • 11. A system as in claim 9, wherein the pusher portion has a concave shape configured for pushing against the inner rims of the two endplates.
  • 12. A system as in claim 9, wherein the prosthesis grasping device is shaped to pass between two opposable jaws of a vertebral spacing device disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae.
  • 13. A system as in claim 9, wherein the grasping member is adapted to push the endplates simultaneously into the space.
  • 14. A system as in claim 9, further comprising a vertebral spacing device for increasing a height of the space between the two vertebrae, wherein the grasping member is adapted to slide through the vertebral spacing device disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae.
  • 15. A system as in claim 14, wherein each pusher device is adapted to slide through the spacing device.
  • 16. A system as in claim 1, wherein the two endplates are separable from each other.
  • 17. A system as in claim 1, wherein the inner rims surround the core.
  • 18. A system for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae, the system comprising: an intervertebral prosthesis having two endplates and a core which are movable with respect to one another and disposed between the two endplates, inner rims located on the two endplates and contacting the core, and fins for attachment to vertebral bone, wherein the two endplates and the core are in contact with one another in an insertion configuration, the inner rims located between the two endplates;a prosthesis grasping device comprising: an elongate rigid shaft having a proximal end and a distal end;an adjustable grasping member coupled with the distal end for releasably grasping the two endplates of the intervertebral prosthesis, the grasping member comprising movable opposing jaws configured to simultaneously grasp around the inner rims of the two endplates such that the endplates and the core are in contact with one another in the insertion configuration and the endplates are constrained from articulating in the insertion configuration, wherein an outer diameter of the grasping member does not extend beyond a largest diameter of the endplates; andan actuator disposed on the shaft and coupled with the grasping member for adjusting the grasping member to grasp and release the prosthesis.
  • 19. A system as in claim 18, wherein the inner rims surround the core.
  • 20. A system for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae, the system comprising: an intervertebral prosthesis having two endplates which are movable with respect to one another, a core disposed between the two endplates, inner rims located on the two endplates and contacting the core, and fins for attachment to vertebral bone, the inner rims comprising annular rims positioned radially inside of a largest diameter of the endplates;a prosthesis grasping device comprising: an elongate rigid shaft having a proximal end and a distal end;an adjustable grasping member coupled with the distal end for releasably grasping the two endplates of the intervertebral prosthesis, the grasping member comprising movable opposing jaws configured to simultaneously grasp around the inner annular rims of the two endplates such that the endplates are constrained from articulating and such that an outer diameter of the grasping member does not extend beyond the largest diameter of the endplates; andan actuator coupled with the grasping member for adjusting the grasping member to grasp and release the prosthesis about the annular rims.
  • 21. A system as in claim 20, wherein the inner rims surround the core.
  • 22. A system for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae, the system comprising: an intervertebral prosthesis having two endplates which are movable with respect to one another, a core disposed between the two endplates, and inner rims located on the two endplates and contacting the core, the inner rims located between the two endplates;a prosthesis grasping device comprising: an elongate rigid shaft having a proximal end and a distal end;an adjustable grasping member coupled with the distal end for releasably grasping the two endplates of the intervertebral prosthesis, the grasping member comprising movable opposing jaws configured to simultaneously grasp around the inner rims of the two endplates such that the endplates are constrained from articulating and such that an outer diameter of the grasping member does not extend beyond a largest diameter of the endplates; andan actuator disposed on and at least partially inside the shaft entirely between the proximal end and the distal end and coupled with the grasping member for adjusting the grasping member to grasp and release the prosthesis without moving the shaft.
  • 23. A system as in claim 22, wherein the inner rims surround the core.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION DATA

The present application is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/044,175 filed Mar. 7, 2008, which application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/913,780 filed Aug. 6, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,585,326); the full disclosures, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (421)
Number Name Date Kind
3486505 Morrison Dec 1969 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4531917 Linkow et al. Jul 1985 A
4566466 Ripple et al. Jan 1986 A
4619660 Christiansen et al. Oct 1986 A
4673407 Martin Jun 1987 A
4759766 Buttner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4863477 Monson Sep 1989 A
4904261 Dove et al. Feb 1990 A
4917704 Frey et al. Apr 1990 A
4932969 Frey et al. Jun 1990 A
4946378 Hirayama et al. Aug 1990 A
4997432 Keller Mar 1991 A
5035716 Downey Jul 1991 A
5057108 Shetty et al. Oct 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5122130 Keller Jun 1992 A
5195526 Michelson Mar 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5306308 Gross et al. Apr 1994 A
5314477 Marnay May 1994 A
5320644 Baumgartner Jun 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5394457 Leibinger et al. Feb 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5415704 Davidson May 1995 A
5458642 Beer et al. Oct 1995 A
5462575 Del Corso Oct 1995 A
5484437 Michelson Jan 1996 A
5489307 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5505732 Michelson Apr 1996 A
5507816 Bullivant Apr 1996 A
5534030 Navarro et al. Jul 1996 A
5556431 Buttner-Janz Sep 1996 A
5674296 Bryan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676701 Yuan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676702 Ratron Oct 1997 A
5683465 Shinn et al. Nov 1997 A
5702450 Bisserie Dec 1997 A
5709683 Bagby Jan 1998 A
5728159 Stroever et al. Mar 1998 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5776198 Rabbe et al. Jul 1998 A
5782832 Larsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5824094 Serhan et al. Oct 1998 A
5836948 Zucherman et al. Nov 1998 A
5865846 Bryan et al. Feb 1999 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5895428 Berry Apr 1999 A
5899901 Middleton May 1999 A
5899911 Carter May 1999 A
5928284 Mehdizadeh Jul 1999 A
5989251 Nichols Nov 1999 A
5989291 Ralph et al. Nov 1999 A
6001130 Bryan et al. Dec 1999 A
6019792 Cauthen Feb 2000 A
6022376 Assell et al. Feb 2000 A
6039761 Li et al. Mar 2000 A
6039763 Shelokov Mar 2000 A
6080155 Michelson Jun 2000 A
6083228 Michelson Jul 2000 A
6086613 Camino et al. Jul 2000 A
6096038 Michelson Aug 2000 A
6132465 Ray et al. Oct 2000 A
6136031 Middleton Oct 2000 A
6139551 Michelson et al. Oct 2000 A
6139579 Steffee et al. Oct 2000 A
6143033 Paul et al. Nov 2000 A
6146421 Gordon et al. Nov 2000 A
6156067 Bryan et al. Dec 2000 A
6159214 Michelson Dec 2000 A
6162252 Kuras et al. Dec 2000 A
6174311 Branch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176881 Schar et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193757 Foley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6224595 Michelson May 2001 B1
6224607 Michelson May 2001 B1
6231609 Mehdizadeh May 2001 B1
6235030 Zuckerman et al. May 2001 B1
6261296 Aebi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264695 Stoy Jul 2001 B1
6290726 Pope et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296664 Middleton Oct 2001 B1
6315797 Middleton Nov 2001 B1
6319257 Carignan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322567 Mittelstadt et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336941 Subba Rao et al. Jan 2002 B1
6348071 Steffee et al. Feb 2002 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368351 Glenn et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375681 Truscott Apr 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395032 Gauchet May 2002 B1
6402785 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409766 Brett Jun 2002 B1
6413278 Marchosky Jul 2002 B1
6416551 Keller Jul 2002 B1
6436098 Michelson Aug 2002 B1
6440139 Michelson Aug 2002 B2
6447544 Michelson Sep 2002 B1
6478800 Fraser et al. Nov 2002 B1
6517544 Michelson Feb 2003 B1
6517580 Ramadan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6520967 Cauthen Feb 2003 B1
6520996 Manasas et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527804 Gauchet et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533817 Norton et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537279 Michelson Mar 2003 B1
6554863 Paul et al. Apr 2003 B2
6554864 Ralph et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562047 Ralph et al. May 2003 B2
6562074 Gerbec et al. May 2003 B2
6565574 Michelson May 2003 B2
6582466 Gauchet Jun 2003 B1
6582468 Gauchet Jun 2003 B1
6592624 Fraser et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599294 Fuss et al. Jul 2003 B2
6607558 Karus Aug 2003 B2
6607559 Ralph et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610092 Ralph et al. Aug 2003 B2
6623525 Ralph et al. Sep 2003 B2
6645248 Casutt Nov 2003 B2
6648895 Burkus et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652533 O'Neil Nov 2003 B2
6660038 Boyer, II et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666866 Mertz et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669731 Ralph et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669732 Serhan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673113 Ralph et al. Jan 2004 B2
6682562 Viart et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689132 Biscup Feb 2004 B2
6706068 Ferree Mar 2004 B2
6709439 Rogers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712819 Zucherman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712825 Aebi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719794 Gerber et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723097 Fraser et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726720 Ross et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726721 Stoy et al. Apr 2004 B2
6733532 Gauchet et al. May 2004 B1
6740118 Eisermann et al. May 2004 B2
6740119 Ralph et al. May 2004 B2
6752832 Neumann Jun 2004 B2
6755841 Fraser et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764512 Keller Jul 2004 B2
6764515 Ralph et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770095 Grinberg et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790233 Brodke et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793678 Hawkins Sep 2004 B2
6814737 Cauthan Nov 2004 B2
6821298 Jackson Nov 2004 B1
6827740 Michelson Dec 2004 B1
6830570 Frey et al. Dec 2004 B1
6846328 Cauthen Jan 2005 B2
6852126 Ahlgren Feb 2005 B2
6863673 Gerbec et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875213 Michelson Apr 2005 B2
6896680 Michelson May 2005 B2
6899735 Coates et al. May 2005 B2
6936071 Marnay et al. Aug 2005 B1
6936132 Topolnitsky Aug 2005 B2
6964686 Gordon Nov 2005 B2
6966929 Mitchell Nov 2005 B2
6966931 Huang Nov 2005 B2
6981989 Fleischmann et al. Jan 2006 B1
6986788 Paul et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989011 Paul et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994727 Khandkar et al. Feb 2006 B2
7011684 Eckman Mar 2006 B2
7022138 Mashburn Apr 2006 B2
7025787 Bryan et al. Apr 2006 B2
7044983 Cheng May 2006 B1
7056344 Huppert et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060073 Frey et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066958 Ferree Jun 2006 B2
7081120 Li et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083651 Diaz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087055 Lim et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097648 Globerman et al. Aug 2006 B1
7115132 Errico et al. Oct 2006 B2
7118580 Beyersdorff et al. Oct 2006 B1
7147665 Bryan et al. Dec 2006 B1
7153325 Kim et al. Dec 2006 B2
7169182 Errico et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179294 Eisermann et al. Feb 2007 B2
7182784 Evans et al. Feb 2007 B2
7198644 Schultz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7207991 Michelson Apr 2007 B2
7214244 Zubok et al. May 2007 B2
7217291 Zucherman et al. May 2007 B2
7235082 Bartish et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235103 Rivin Jun 2007 B2
7250060 Trieu Jul 2007 B2
7255714 Malek Aug 2007 B2
7261739 Ralph et al. Aug 2007 B2
7267688 Ferree Sep 2007 B2
7270679 Istephanous et al. Sep 2007 B2
7270682 Frigg et al. Sep 2007 B2
7303582 Brady Dec 2007 B2
7303583 Schar et al. Dec 2007 B1
7318839 Malberg et al. Jan 2008 B2
7326250 Beaurain et al. Feb 2008 B2
7331995 Eisermann et al. Feb 2008 B2
7429270 Baumgartner et al. Sep 2008 B2
7442211 de Villiers et al. Oct 2008 B2
7452380 Zubok et al. Nov 2008 B2
7491241 Errico et al. Feb 2009 B2
7494508 Zeegers Feb 2009 B2
7517363 Rogers et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531001 de Villiers et al. May 2009 B2
7549995 Schultz et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563284 Coppes et al. Jul 2009 B2
7563286 Gerber et al. Jul 2009 B2
7585326 de Villiers et al. Sep 2009 B2
7637913 de Villiers et al. Dec 2009 B2
7708776 Blain et al. May 2010 B1
7708777 O'Neil et al. May 2010 B2
7731753 Reo et al. Jun 2010 B2
8348958 Ralph et al. Jan 2013 B2
8388684 Bao et al. Mar 2013 B2
20010016773 Serhan et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010029377 Aebi et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020022845 Zdeblick et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020035400 Bryan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020045904 Fuss et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020068936 Burkus et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091392 Michelson Jul 2002 A1
20020116009 Fraser et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123753 Michelson Sep 2002 A1
20020128715 Bryan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020165550 Frey et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177897 Michelson Nov 2002 A1
20020198532 Michelson Dec 2002 A1
20030009224 Kuras Jan 2003 A1
20030023245 Ralph et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028249 Baccelli et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040746 Mitchell et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045884 Robie et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030045939 Casutt Mar 2003 A1
20030069586 Errico et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074076 Ferree Apr 2003 A1
20030078590 Errico et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083747 Winterbottom et al. May 2003 A1
20030100951 Serhan et al. May 2003 A1
20030125739 Bagga Jul 2003 A1
20030130662 Michelson Jul 2003 A1
20030135277 Bryan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139812 Garcia et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030187448 Michelson Oct 2003 A1
20030191536 Ferree Oct 2003 A1
20030195517 Michelson Oct 2003 A1
20030195631 Ferree Oct 2003 A1
20030199982 Bryan Oct 2003 A1
20030204261 Eisermann et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208271 Kuras Nov 2003 A1
20030229358 Errico et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233145 Landry et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002761 Rogers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024407 Ralph Feb 2004 A1
20040024410 Olson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030391 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040034426 Errico et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040054411 Kelly et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059318 Zhang et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073307 Keller Apr 2004 A1
20040073311 Ferree Apr 2004 A1
20040073312 Eisermann et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093087 Ferree et al. May 2004 A1
20040097928 Zdeblick et al. May 2004 A1
20040098131 Bryan et al. May 2004 A1
20040117021 Biedermann et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040143270 Zucherman et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143332 Krueger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143334 Ferree Jul 2004 A1
20040167626 Geremakis et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040176843 Zubok et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186569 Berry Sep 2004 A1
20040215342 Suddaby Oct 2004 A1
20040225295 Zubok et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225365 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236426 Ralph et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243238 Arin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254644 Taylor Dec 2004 A1
20050015094 Keller Jan 2005 A1
20050015095 Keller Jan 2005 A1
20050015152 Sweeney Jan 2005 A1
20050021042 Marnay et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021145 de Villiers et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021146 de Villiers et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027360 Webb et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033305 Schultz Feb 2005 A1
20050038515 Kunzler Feb 2005 A1
20050043800 Paul et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050085917 Marnay et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050107881 Alleyne et al. May 2005 A1
20050113842 Bertagnoli et al. May 2005 A1
20050113928 Cragg et al. May 2005 A1
20050143749 Zalenski et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143824 Richelsoph et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149189 Mokhtar et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154463 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050165408 Puno et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171604 Michalow Aug 2005 A1
20050192586 Zuckerman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050192670 Zubok et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197706 Hovorka et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216081 Taylor Sep 2005 A1
20050216084 Fleischmann et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234553 Gordon Oct 2005 A1
20050251260 Gerber et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251261 Peterman Nov 2005 A1
20050251262 de Villiers et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261772 Filippi et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267580 Suddaby Dec 2005 A1
20050267581 Marnay et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004377 Keller Jan 2006 A1
20060004453 Bartish et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015183 Gilbert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020342 Ferree et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025862 de Villiers et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029186 de Villiers et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060030860 Peterman Feb 2006 A1
20060030862 de Villiers et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036325 Paul et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041313 Allard et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041314 Millard Feb 2006 A1
20060052870 Feree Mar 2006 A1
20060064169 Feree Mar 2006 A1
20060069439 Zucherman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060116768 Krueger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142858 Colleran et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142862 Diaz et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155378 Eckman Jul 2006 A1
20060167549 Mathys et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060178744 de Villiers et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178746 Bartish et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195097 Evans et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200239 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224241 Butler et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235426 Lim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235525 Gil et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235527 Buettner-Janz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241641 Albans et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241766 Felton et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259144 Trieu Nov 2006 A1
20060259146 Navarro et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265068 Schwab Nov 2006 A1
20060265077 Zwirkoski Nov 2006 A1
20060287728 Mokhtar et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293752 Moumene et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293753 Thramann Dec 2006 A1
20060293754 de Villiers et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010826 Rhoda et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021837 Ashman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032875 Blacklock et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061011 de Villiers et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067035 Falahee Mar 2007 A1
20070067036 Hudgins et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073398 Fabian et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070093898 Schwab et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100453 Parsons et al. May 2007 A1
20070100454 Burgess et al. May 2007 A1
20070100456 Dooris et al. May 2007 A1
20070123903 Raymond et al. May 2007 A1
20070123904 Stad et al. May 2007 A1
20070135923 Peterman et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070162133 Doubler et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168033 Kim et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168036 Ainsworth et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179615 Heinz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070213821 Kwak et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233077 Khalili Oct 2007 A1
20070233247 Schwab Oct 2007 A1
20070233248 Schwab et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233251 Abdou Oct 2007 A1
20070270970 Trieu Nov 2007 A1
20070282449 de Villiers et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299521 Glenn et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015698 Marino et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015701 Garcia et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021557 Trieu Jan 2008 A1
20080051900 de Villiers et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051901 de Villiers et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080125864 de Villiers et al. May 2008 A1
20080125865 Abdelgany May 2008 A1
20080133011 de Villiers et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154301 de Villiers et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154382 de Villiers et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080215155 de Villiers et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221696 de Villiers et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228274 de Villiers et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228277 de Villiers et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080294259 de Villiers et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090043391 de Villiers et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048674 Zubok et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048677 McLeod et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090076614 Arramon Mar 2009 A1
20090105833 Hovda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105834 Hovda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105835 Hovda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090192617 Arramon et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090205188 de Villiers et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210060 de Villiers et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222101 de Villiers et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090276051 Arramon et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090326656 de Villiers et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004746 Arramon Jan 2010 A1
20100016972 Jansen et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016973 de Villiers et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030335 Arramon Feb 2010 A1
20100049040 de Villiers et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100069976 de Villiers et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076558 de Villiers et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100087868 Barr et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100179419 de Villiers et al. Jul 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (57)
Number Date Country
3023353 Sep 1981 DE
9920209 Apr 1999 DE
WO 9930651 Jun 1999 DE
10035182 Jul 2002 DE
20310433 Sep 2003 DE
0 333 990 Sep 1989 EP
0333990 May 1990 EP
0 560 140 Sep 1993 EP
0 560 141 Sep 1993 EP
0 591 712 Apr 1994 EP
0 820 740 Jan 1998 EP
1 142 544 Oct 2001 EP
1 153 582 Nov 2001 EP
1153582 Nov 2001 EP
1 250 898 Oct 2002 EP
1 306 064 May 2003 EP
1 344 493 Sep 2003 EP
1 344 506 Sep 2003 EP
1 344 507 Sep 2003 EP
1 344 508 Sep 2003 EP
1 405 615 Apr 2004 EP
1 417 940 May 2004 EP
1 570 813 Sep 2005 EP
2 803 741 Jul 2001 FR
61-122859 Jun 1986 JP
63-164948 Jul 1988 JP
01-136655 May 1989 JP
06-007391 Jan 1994 JP
2002-521090 Jul 2002 JP
2003-508119 Mar 2003 JP
WO 9817209 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9817209 Sep 1998 WO
WO 0004851 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0035384 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0042954 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0042954 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101893 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0115637 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0168003 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0211650 Feb 2002 WO
WO 2004000170 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004000171 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004026187 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004041131 May 2004 WO
WO 2004054477 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2005004756 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005004756 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005004757 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005053580 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005072662 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005112834 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2005112834 May 2006 WO
WO 2006119092 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006119092 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007121320 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2007121320 Jun 2008 WO
039312 Nov 2003 ZA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
Buttner-Janz, “The Development of the Artificial Disc,” Introduction, pp. 1-18, Library of Congress Catalogue No. 92-75582, ISBN 0-9635430-0-8 (1989).
Hellier et al., “Wear Studies for Development of an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis,” Spine, vol. 17 No. 6 Supplement pp. 86-96 (1992).
Lee et al., “Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model,” Spine vol. 25, No. 19, pp. 2431-2439 (2000).
Lehuec et al., “Shock Absorption in Lumber Disc Prosthesis,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 346-351(2003).
International search report and written opinion dated Apr. 6, 2007 for PCT/US2005/027049.
International search report dated Jul. 21, 2005 for PCT/US2005/026160.
International search report dated Jul. 27, 2007 for PCT/US2005/002263.
Japanese office action dated Feb. 12, 2010 for JP 2004-524870.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,352, filed Sep. 14, 2012, de Villiers et al.
European search report and opinion dated May 2, 2012 for EP Application No. 05777414.3.
Office action dated Feb. 5, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,780.
Office action dated Feb. 20, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,175.
Office action dated Mar. 22, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,165.
Office action dated Mar. 31, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,175.
Office action dated Jul. 16, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,780.
Office action dated Aug. 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,175.
Office action dated Oct. 5, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,165.
Office action dated Nov. 13, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,175.
Office action dated Jul. 3, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,352.
Office action dated Jul. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/044,175.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100100141 A1 Apr 2010 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10913780 Aug 2004 US
Child 12044175 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12044175 Mar 2008 US
Child 12650231 US