The present disclosure relates to methods and apparatus for spray drying a liquid product into a dried powder without applying heat, or applying substantially low amounts of heat.
Spray drying is a method of producing a dry powder from a liquid or slurry by rapidly drying with a hot gas (usually air). Spray drying technology has existed since the late 1800's and has continually evolved over the past century.
The spray drying process begins with a liquid solvent, commonly water, containing dissolved or suspended components such as an emulsion. The suspension includes a substance to be encapsulated (the load) and an amphipathic carrier (usually some sort of modified starch), which are homogenized as a suspension in the liquid solvent. The load is typically some constituent component(s) of a food, fragrance, medicament, etc., and the homogenized suspension is often referred to as a slurry.
Spray dryers use some type of atomizer, such as a spray nozzle, to disperse the slurry into a controlled spray having some relatively controlled droplet size. Depending on the process requirements, droplet sizes may range from about 10 to 500 microns in diameter. The most common applications require droplet sizes in the 50 to 200 micron range.
In conjunction with atomization, the slurry is fed into a drying chamber, usually a tower into which heated air is also introduced. The temperature of the air as it enters the drying chamber is well over the boiling point of water, usually in the range of 180-200° C. The heated air supplies energy for evaporation of volatile components of the liquid (the water) from the droplets. As the water evaporates, the carrier forms a hardened shell around the load, producing a dried powder.
Reference is made to
The slurry formed in the solution tank 4 is delivered to an atomizer 6 using a feed pump 5 or other means of conveyance. The slurry enters the atomizer 6 and leaves the atomizer as a spray of liquid droplets 8, and the droplets 8 are introduced into a drying chamber 7. Concurrently, a feed of air is heated by a process heater 11 and supplied into the drying chamber 7 by a blower 10. The water evaporated from the droplets 8 enters the heated air as the atomized liquid droplets 8 dry to form solid particles after exposure to the incoming heated air.
The dried powder leaves the dryer chamber 7 along with the water vapor laden air, and is carried to a cyclone separator 12, which removes the dried particles from the circulating air stream and deposits the particles into a collection container 13. The water vapor laden air exits the collection container 13 and enters a baghouse 14, where very fine particles are removed before the water vapor laden air is sent into a condenser 9, via blower 15. The condenser 9 removes the water vapor from the process air, and the collected water may be re-used or discarded.
One of the prominent attributes of the traditional spray drying process is the high temperature of the inlet gas (typically on the order of 200° C.) leaving the heater 11 and entering the drying chamber 7, as well as the temperature of the outlet gas exiting the drying chamber 7, which is usually in excess of 100° C. Although the liquid droplets 8 are injected into the high temperature environment within the chamber 7, the droplets 8 do not actually reach the inlet gas temperature. The droplets 8, however, do become heated to a point at which considerable portions of desired constituents of the droplets (i.e., portions of the load) are undesirably modified, such as evaporated and/or oxidized. The undesirable modification to the load (load loss) leads to a reduction in flavor (in the case of food loads), a reduction in aroma (in the case of fragrances), etc. Essentially, evaporation and heat degradation of the load lowers the performance characteristics of the final powder product, and therefore results in a significant degradation of performance in commercial use and a significant loss of revenue.
The above disadvantageous characteristics of the conventional spray dry process have resulted in many process modifications and emulsion formulations to compensate for heat induced alterations in the load. This is especially true in the pharmaceutical industry, where excessive heating during spray drying leads to degradation of the active ingredient in a powdered medicament. This also presents a challenge to flavorists in the powdered flavor industry to design flavor formulations that can survive the drying process and deliver acceptable (although significantly flawed) flavor characteristics.
In view of the above, there are needs in the art for new methods and apparatus for carrying out the spray drying process, which reduce or eliminate the disadvantageous characteristics of the conventional spray dry process.
Methods and apparatus for spray drying a liquid product into a dried powder without applying heat provide for: forming a slurry including a liquid solvent, a carrier, and an active ingredient; applying an electrostatic charge to the slurry; atomizing the charged slurry to produce a plurality of electrostatically charged, wet particles; suspending the electrostatically charged, wet particles for a sufficient time to permit repulsive forces induced by the electrostatic charge on at least some wet particles to cause at least some of such particles to divide into wet sub-particles; and continuing the suspending step, without the presence of any heated drying fluids, for a sufficient time to drive off a sufficient amount of the liquid solvent within most of the wet particles to leave a plurality of dried particles (the powder), each dried particle containing the active ingredient encapsulated within the carrier.
Preferably, a temperature of the non-heated drying fluid is less than about 100° C. at introduction into the drying chamber, such as at least one of: less than about 75° C. at introduction into the drying chamber; less than about 45° C. at introduction into the drying chamber; less than about 35° C. at introduction into the drying chamber; less than about 30° C. at introduction into the drying chamber; and at about an ambient temperature of a room within which the drying chamber is located.
The methods and apparatus may further provide for subjecting the electrostatically charged, wet particles to a non-heated drying fluid within a drying chamber to drive off the liquid solvent. Alternatively or additionally, the methods and apparatus may further provide for dehumidifying the non-heated drying fluid prior to introduction into the drying chamber. Alternatively or additionally, the methods and apparatus may further provide for applying one or more electric fields within the drying chamber to urge at least one of the wet particles and the dry particles to travel in a direction defined from an inlet end of the drying chamber to an outlet end of the drying chamber.
The methods and apparatus may further provide for controlling one or more of a viscosity of the slurry during formation a ratio of water within the slurry during formation, such that one or more of: (i) the viscosity of the slurry at the atomization step is at least one of: greater than about 300 mPa-s; greater than about 350 mPa-s; greater than about 400 mPa-s; greater than about 500 mPa-s; greater than about 600 mPa-s; greater than about 700 mPa-s; between about 500-16,000 mPa-s; and between about 1000-4000 mPa-s; and (ii) the ratio of water within the slurry at the atomization step is at least one of: between about 20-50 weight percentage; between about 20-45 weight percentage; between about 20-45 weight percentage; between about 20-40 weight percentage; about 30 weight percentage.
The apparatus may include a drying chamber, including an inlet end, an outlet end, and an internal volume within which the liquid product is dried, where the drying chamber is formed from a non-electrically conductive material.
Additionally or alternatively, a first electrode may be located at or near the inlet end of the drying chamber; and a second electrode may be located at or near the outlet end of the drying chamber, where application of a source of voltage potential between the first and second electrodes induces an electric field within the drying chamber sufficient to urge particles of the liquid product, produced by way of atomization, from the inlet end toward the outlet end of the drying chamber. Preferably, the first and second electrodes are disposed external to the drying chamber, yet induce an electric field within the internal volume of the drying chamber by virtue of the formation of the drying chamber from the non-electrically conductive material.
The apparatus may additionally or alternatively include a nozzle operating to atomize a slurry to produce a plurality of wet particles, where the slurry includes a liquid solvent, a carrier, and an active ingredient. The apparatus may further include at least one electrode operating to contact the slurry and apply an electrostatic charge thereto, such that the nozzle operates to produce a plurality of electrostatically charged wet particles. The at least one electrode may be disposed within the nozzle such that the slurry contacts the electrode and becomes electrostatically charged while flowing from an inlet end to an outlet end of the nozzle.
A dried powder produced using one or more aspects of the invention may include: a plurality of dried particles, which individually contain an amount of final active ingredient encapsulated within a carrier resulting from drying a slurry containing an initial active ingredient, a liquid solvent and the carrier, wherein: the initial active ingredient includes one or more constituent components, at least one of which is among one or more principle molecular types from which at least one of a desirable food, flavor, fragrance, medicament, and pigment is obtained; the final active ingredient includes one or more of the constituent components corresponding with those of the initial active ingredient as modified by the drying of the slurry; and wherein a weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the final active ingredient is within about 5% of a weight percentage of the corresponding principle molecular types in the initial active ingredient.
Alternatively or additionally, the weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the final active ingredient may be within about 3%, 2% or 1% of a weight percentage of the corresponding principle molecular types in the initial active ingredient.
Additionally or alternatively, a dried powder produced using one or more aspects of the invention may include: a plurality of dried particles, which individually contain an amount of active ingredient encapsulated within a carrier, wherein: the active ingredient includes one or more constituent components, at least one of which is among one or more principle molecular types from which at least one of a desirable food, flavor, fragrance, medicament, and pigment is obtained; and wherein a weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the active ingredient does not vary by more than about 5% during aging of the dried powder during any period of elevated temperature of about 95° F. up to about 1000 hours.
Additionally or alternatively, the weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the active ingredient does not vary by more than about 3%, 2% or 1% during aging of the dried during any period of elevated temperature of about 95° F. up to about 1000 hours.
Other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art from the description herein taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
For the purposes of illustration, there are forms shown in the drawings that are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
With reference to the drawings, wherein like numerals indicate like elements, there is shown in
By way of a high level description, the system 100 includes a drying chamber 107 into which a slurry is fed by way of a feed pump 5 (or equivalent conveying mechanism). The slurry enters an atomizer 106 and leaves the atomizer as a spray of liquid droplets 108, which are introduced into the drying chamber 7. Concurrently, a feed of non-heated fluid (such as air or another suitable gas) is supplied into the drying chamber 107 by a blower 10. The supplied air may be subjected to dehumidification (via dehumidifier 110) prior to introduction into the drying chamber 107. The atomized liquid droplets 108 dry to form solid particles after exposure to the incoming air. Water evaporates from the droplets 108 and enters the air within the drying chamber 107. Dried powder leaves the drying chamber 107 along with the water vapor laden air, and is carried to a cyclone separator 12, which removes the dried particles from the circulating air stream and deposits the particles into a collection container 13. The water vapor laden air exits the collection container 13 and enters a baghouse 14, where very fine particles are removed before the water vapor laden air is sent into a condenser 9, via blower 15. The condenser 9 removes the water vapor from the process air, and the collected water may be re-used or discarded.
There are a number of very significant differences between the systems of
Among the reasons that non-heated air may be used in the spray drying system 100 and process is that the slurry is not conventional. In general, the slurry includes a liquid solvent, a carrier, and an active ingredient. The liquid solvent is usually water, however, other suitable solvents may be employed if needed or desired. The carrier is usually a modified starch. The active ingredient may be any desirable single constituent component or a combination of constituent components, at least one of which is among one or more principle molecular types from which at least one of a desirable food, flavor, fragrance, medicament, pigment, probiotic, bacteria, etc. is obtained.
Formation of the slurry is controlled such that regulation of at least one of the viscosity, the amount of liquid solvent (e.g., water), or other suitable metric relating to the water content of the slurry, is obtained. For example, the formation of the slurry may include controlling a viscosity of the slurry such that the viscosity at the atomization step is at least one of: greater than about 300 mPa-s; greater than about 350 mPa-s; greater than about 400 mPa-s; greater than about 500 mPa-s; greater than about 600 mPa-s; greater than about 700 mPa-s; between about 500-16,000 mPa-s; and between about 1000-4000 mPa-s. Additionally or alternatively, the formation of the slurry may include controlling a ratio of water within the slurry such that the ratio of water within the slurry at the atomization step is at least one of: between about 20-50 weight percentage; between about 20-45 weight percentage; between about 20-45 weight percentage; between about 20-40 weight percentage; and about 30 weight percentage. In order to provide some information as to the significant differences between a slurry according to one or more embodiments of the invention and conventional slurries, it is noted that conventional slurries have viscosities between about 10-200 mPa-s and contain an amount of water between about 50-70% by weight.
Another reason that non-heated air may be used in the spray drying system 100 (and process) relates to an unconventional electrostatic charging process that is conducted before, during or after atomization. In particular, an electrostatic charge is applied to the slurry or to the atomized droplets 108, preferably the former. In this regard, the system 100 includes a high voltage supply 104 (such as about 45 kV DC) that is coupled to one or more electrodes (not shown in
The respective charge on the wet droplets 108 produces a force that tends to cause adjacent droplets to repel one another. Additionally, the force on a given droplet 108 opposes the surface tension of such given droplet 108. When the charge on the given droplet 108 exceeds a threshold level, the Rayleigh limit, the droplet 108 becomes unstable and smaller satellite droplets 108 are ejected from the given (parent) droplet 108. One or more of the satellite droplets 108, in turn, might also become unstable and produce additional satellite droplets 108, since the surface charge density does not diminish in the satellite droplets 108 as evaporation takes place.
The electrostatically charged, wet particles/droplets 108 are suspended for a sufficient time within the drying chamber 107 to permit the aforementioned repulsive forces induced by the electrostatic charge on at least some wet particles/droplets 108 to cause at least some of such particles to divide into wet sub-particles/droplets 108. The suspension of the droplets 108 continues, without the presence of any heated drying fluids, for a sufficient time to drive off a sufficient amount of the liquid solvent within most of the wet particles/droplets 108 to leave a plurality of dried particles (the powder), each dried particle containing the active ingredient encapsulated within the carrier. Notably, the production of sub-particles/droplets 108 from a given volume of atomized slurry (i.e., from a given droplet 108) results in faster drying of such volume due to a greatly increased aggregate surface area of the sub-particles/droplets 108 and concomitant reduction of particle volume of each sub-particle/droplet 108 following each fission event.
The production of sub-particles/droplets 108 may be referred to as coulombic fission. The time scale for such coulombic fission events is on the order of a few microseconds to milliseconds. The fission of about ten (10) sub-particles/droplets 108 from a given particle/droplet 108 reduces a diameter of the given particle/droplet 108 by about 30%. The amount of time that it takes to achieve such reduction in diameter (on the order of a few microseconds to milliseconds) is an order of magnitude faster than diffusive evaporation in the presence of heated air, which occurs with a characteristic time t in accordance with the following formula:
t=do2/k
where do is the diameter of the particle and k is the evaporative diffusion coefficient. For particles in the 20 to 200 mm diameter range, the time to any significant diameter reduction by evaporation is on the order of tenths to several seconds, which is far longer (one to two orders of magnitude) than diameter reduction by coulombic fission.
The individual or combined characteristics of relative low water content in the slurry and electrostatic charge on the droplets 108 permits vastly a different temperature condition within the drying chamber 107 as compared with prior art systems and processes. For example, a temperature of the non-heated drying fluid (air) introduced into the drying chamber 107 may be at least one of: less than about 100° C.; less than about 75° C.; less than about 45° C.; less than about 35° C.; less than about 30° C.; and at about an ambient temperature of a room within which the drying chamber 107 is located. The above temperature ranges assume a lower limit above freezing.
It has been demonstrated that an inlet air temperature of about 40° C. may result in an outlet air temperature of about 32° C. from the drying chamber 107.
While elevated temperatures as compared to the convention spray drying process of the prior art may not be necessary, it may be desirable to ensure that the drying fluid (air) introduced into the drying chamber 107 is of relatively low water content. Thus, the system 100 may include the process dehumidifier 110 in order to remove some amount of water from the air prior to introduction into the drying chamber 107. After dehumidification, the non-heated air as input into the drying chamber 107 may be at a relative humidity of about 7%.
The atomizer 106 may be implemented by way of any of the known methods, apparatus, and/or techniques. For example, the atomizer 106 may be implemented using at least one of: a nozzle technique, a centrifugal technique, a pneumatic technique, and an ultrasonic technique. For most atomization techniques, the slurry does not leave the atomizing mechanism as a final droplet 108, but rather as a fragment of a thin liquid film or ligament. The formation of droplets 108 takes place immediately after the liquid has left the atomizing mechanism, due to the surface tension of the liquid. The droplet size from a given type of atomization depends on the energy input into breaking the slurry into fragments, i.e., increasing the overall effective surface area of the slurry.
The average droplet size and distribution may be fairly constant for a given atomization technique, and may be in the range of 10-300 microns. The electrostatic charge process and resultant coulombic fission process in accordance with the various embodiments herein produces, in general, larger particles than conventional spray drying processes. The larger particles, however, come from even larger, parent particles, which conventional atomizers cannot adequately produce. The daughter particles produced in accordance with the embodiments herein are smaller, and the process tends to make bimodal size distributions for very viscous slurries.
Centrifugal (or rotary) atomization may be considered the most common form of atomization. Centrifugal atomization employs a rotating disc or wheel, which breaks the liquid stream of slurry into droplets. The centrifugal atomization device may employ a disc or wheel of about 5 to 50 cm in diameter, which spins in the range of about 5,000 to 40,000 rpm. The size of the droplets 108 produced by a centrifugal atomization device is about inversely proportional to the peripheral speed of the disc or wheel.
Nozzle atomization employs a pump (e.g., the feed pump 5 of
Two-fluid pneumatic atomization employs the interaction of the slurry with another fluid, usually compressed air using a fluid nozzle for the compressed air and a fluid nozzle for the slurry. The pressure of the air and slurry may be in the range of about 200 to 350 kPa. Particle size is controlled by varying a ratio of the compressed air flow to that of the slurry flow.
Sonic atomization employs ultrasonic energy to vibrate a surface at ultrasonic frequencies. The slurry is brought into contact with the vibrating surface in order to produce the particles/droplets 108.
With reference to
The two-fluid atomizer 200 includes a body 202 having a proximal end 204 and a distal end 206. A channel 208 extends through the body 202 and includes an inlet 210, generally near the proximal end 204 of the body 202, and an outlet 212, generally near the distal end 206 of the body 202. The channel 208 operates to convey a first of the two-fluids, i.e., the slurry, from the inlet 210 to the outlet 212.
The two-fluid atomizer 200 also includes at least one electrode 214 operating to contact the slurry and apply an electrostatic charge thereto, such that the two-fluid atomizer 200 operates to produce a plurality of electrostatically charged wet particles/droplets 108. In one or more embodiments, the at least one electrode 214 may be disposed within the body 202 of the two-fluid atomizer 200 such that the slurry contacts the electrode 214 and becomes electrostatically charged while flowing from the inlet 210 to the outlet 212 of the channel 208. As illustrated in
With reference to
The two-fluid atomizer 200 may further include a nozzle cap 222, which generally surrounds the nozzle 220 and permits the nozzle orifice 236 to extend through a bore 266 at a distal end thereof. The nozzle cap 222 includes an engagement feature at a proximal end thereof, which engages the distal end of the body 202. In particular, the nozzle cap 222 includes a threaded shank 238, which threads into a complementary threaded bore 240 of the body 202. A sealing ring 242 may be employed to ensure a fluid tight seal as between an internal surface 244 of the nozzle cap 222 and an external surface 246 of the nozzle 220, thereby forming an internal volume 248 therebetween.
The two-fluid atomizer 200 includes another channel 250 extending through the body 202, which includes an inlet 252, generally near the proximal end 204 of the body 202, and an outlet 254, generally near the distal end 206 of the body 202. The channel 250 operates to convey a second of the two-fluids, i.e., the non-heated air, from the inlet 252 to the outlet 254. The outlet 254 is in fluid communication with the internal volume 248 (between the internal surface 244 of the nozzle cap 222 and the external surface 246 of the nozzle 220). Thus, the channel 250 operates to convey the non-heated air from the proximal end 204 to the distal end 206 of the two-fluid atomizer 200. The flow of the non-heated air through the two-fluid atomizer 200 may be about 5100 m3/hr at an input pressure of about 130 psi.
As best seen in
The swirling fluid motion of the non-heated air, as it leaves the nozzle 220 and nozzle cap 222, imparts a swirling agitation to the plurality of wet particles/droplets 108 as they leave the nozzle 220. Such swirling agitation may suspend and agitate the wet particles/droplets 108 in order to achieve the aforementioned fission and evaporation. The above approach to atomization enables relatively high slurry throughput, on the order of 1-20 kg/hr at an input pressure of about 20-100 psi.
Reference is now made to
A benefit of using non-heated air (which is directly counter to the conventional wisdom in the spray drying art) is that the drying chamber 107 may be formed from a non-metallic material; indeed, the temperature inside the drying chamber 107 may be less than 50° C. Thus, materials such as polymer-based composites may be employed for implementing the basic drying chamber 107. By way of example, filament wound fiberglass composite tanks (which are used for storage of water, various food stuffs, grain storage, brines and many non-food based applications) have excellent load carrying properties and can be used for making very large tanks. In one or more embodiments, such filament wound fiberglass composite materials may be used to fabricate the drying chamber 107 discussed herein. An advantage of using engineered plastics is the lower cost of the basic materials and the cost of manufacturing when compared to similar sized vessels made from stainless steel, for example. These materials also enable greater flexibility in the design of the drying chamber 107, making complex shapes possible, which are much more difficult and expensive to manufacture from stainless steel.
The use of non-metallic, non-conducting dielectric materials to form the drying chamber 107 (such as the engineered plastic composite materials), permits the use of one or more electric fields within the drying chamber 107 itself, to urge the particles/droplets 108 into desired trajectories and/or to urge such particles/droplets 108 from the inlet end 300 toward the outlet end 302 of the drying chamber 107. Notably, it is virtually impossible to develop an electric field inside a metallic, conductive vessel of the prior art because all charge accumulates on the surface of the vessel.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, the drying chamber 107 may include a first electrode 310 located at or near the inlet end 300 thereof, and a second electrode 312 located at or near the outlet end 302 of the drying chamber 107. The application of a source of voltage potential between the first and second electrodes 310, 312 induces an electric field (illustrated as broken lines) within the drying chamber 107 sufficient to urge the particles/droplets 108 into desired trajectories as they dry within the chamber 107. One such desirable trajectory is to cause the lines of the electric field to extend generally parallel to the walls of the drying chamber 107, even where such walls taper toward the outlet end 302. To achieve such trajectory, the second electrode 312 would have to be of a relatively small diameter as compared to the first electrode 310 (as is depicted by only the solid portion of the line of the electrode 312.) If the first and second electrodes 310, 312 are of generally the same diameter, then the lines of the electric field would extend generally parallel to the walls of the drying chamber 107, and then pass through the tapered walls at the outlet end 302. Other particle trajectories may be achieved based on number, location, size, and shape of the electrodes. As illustrated, the first and second electrodes 310, 312 may be disposed external to the drying chamber 107, yet induce an electric field within the internal volume 304 of the drying chamber 107 by virtue of the formation thereof from non-electrically conductive material.
To illustrate the utility of the no heat spray drying process for probiotic applications, Dannon™ Aunatural plain yogurt was subject to spray drying process described herein. In order to show that the bacteria (called L. acidophilus) survived the process, the spray dried yogurt was used to produce a new culture of yogurt. Since yogurt is approximately 85% water by weight, a slurry was formed using 643 grams of starch M180 and 357 grams of yogurt to make 1 kg batch of slurry. The starch to yogurt ratio was about 1.8. The slurry was subject to the no-heat drying process discussed above with respect to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The above data reveal that not only are some of the structures and processes of the system 100 of
Another way to characterize the inventive characteristics of the dried powder/fibers is that a weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the active ingredient does not vary significantly (not by more than about 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, or 1%) during aging of the dried powder during any period of elevated temperature of about 95° F. up to about 1000 hours.
The present disclosure provides a new method of spray drying, using a low temperature, e.g., “no heat”, spray drying process that produces powder products with superior flavor retention and stability. The spray drying method of the present disclosure does not employ purposely heated gas for removing water from the atomized fluid droplets, as has been the case in previously employed spray drying operations. The spray drying method of the present disclosure instead uses unheated air, e.g., dehumidified air, to carry out high throughput atomization processes, utilizing unique dryer designs and high solids content (low water content) slurries/emulsions with extremely high viscosities (for example, viscosities in a range of from 500 to 10000 mPa-s) to produce powders dried at low temperatures, such as temperatures on the order of from 5 to 50° C.
In specific embodiments, the air utilized in the spray drying operation may have a relative humidity of 10% or less, e.g., less than 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, or 1%. The dewpoint of such air may be in a range of from −20° C. to 5° C., such as in a range of from −15° C. to 5° C., from −12° C. to 3° C., from −12° C. to 0° C., from −12° C. to −5° C., or any other suitable dewpoint range appropriate to the spray drying operation.
The use of high solids content emulsions (with solids concentrations of at least 40% by weight, based on total weight of the emulsion, and preferably at least 50% by weight on the same total weight basis) in the low temperature, e.g., no heat, spray drying process of the present disclosure provides a host of desirable attributes to the final powders produced by the process, such as: (1) high particle density, with density greater than that of water (i.e., >1 g/cc), so that the particles readily sink into aqueous solution and become rapidly dissolved or suspended, (2) greater resistance to oxidation imparted by the higher solids content, (3) substantial energy efficiency from the use of high solids content slurries/emulsions coupled with low temperatures, since about half as much water is evaporated as compared to traditional spray drying processes, and (4) superior retention of high value active ingredients such as flavors or fragrances, as another substantial economic advantage brought about by low temperature drying and high solids content slurries/emulsions.
By contrast, conventional high temperature drying processes lose a significant amount of the highly volatile flavor or fragrance active constituents to evaporation and oxidation, resulting in powders with less desirable flavor and aroma attributes. These powders resulting from high temperature conventional processes are typically of small average diameter, e.g., on the order of 60-100 micrometers, are not fully dense, and are difficult to dissolve in aqueous solutions. Powders produced by the low temperature spray drying process of the present disclosure, by contrast, have large average diameters, such as on the order of 125-250 micrometers, are fully dense, and readily go into solution.
The spray drying process of the present disclosure as a consequence of its low temperature, e.g., no heat, character, may be utilized for preparation of spray dried products that contain highly volatile components, e.g., volatile active ingredients whose boiling points are less than 100° C., and may for example be less than 90° C., 80° C., 70° C., 65° C., 60° C., 55° C., 50° C., 45° C., 40° C., 35° C., or even lower.
The spray drying process of the present disclosure may be employed to form spray dried powders and fibers in which one or more of the principle molecular types include aldehydes such as acetaldehydes, valeraldehyde, iso-valeraldehyde, etc., dimethyl and other alkyl sulfides, acetates such as ethyl acetates and other alkyl acetates, propionates such as ethyl proprionate, alkyl butyrates such as methyl butyrate and ethyl butyrate, ketones, esters, etc.
Spray dried powders and fibers of the present disclosure, wherein volatile active ingredient(s) are highly retained, may be incorporated into any suitable products, such as for example beverages, sports beverages, nutritional beverages, gums, dairy products, soups, sauces, condiments, baked goods, personal-care products, oral care products, detergents, fresheners, etc.
Spray dried powders and fibers of the present disclosure thus can be produced in which the final active ingredient includes one or more of the constituent components corresponding to those of the initial active ingredient as modified by the spray drying process, wherein the spray dried powder or fiber composition has at least one of the characteristics of (i) a weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the final active ingredient which is within about 15% of a weight percentage of the corresponding principle molecular types in the initial active ingredient, and which may for example be within about 12%, 10%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or 1% of the weight percentage of the corresponding principle molecular types in the initial active ingredient, and (ii) a weight percentage of at least one of the one or more principle molecular types in the final active ingredient which does not vary by more than about 15% during aging of the dried powder or fiber during any period of elevated temperature of about 95° F. up to about 1000 hours, and which may for example not vary by more than about 12%, 10%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or 1% during such aging.
The present disclosure thus embodies a novel approach for slurry or emulsion formulation for use in a low/no heat spray drying process, resulting in greatly improved powder properties and sensory characteristics of taste, aroma, etc.
In addition to having broad utility for processing of a wide variety of natural and artificial products, the spray drying process of the present disclosure is useful in the context of increasing utilization of natural products, including the proliferating use of essential oils extracted from natural sources. Essential oils are composed of wide ranges of lipophilic and highly volatile components covering a diverse spectrum of chemical classes. Essential oils, however, are susceptible to conversion and degradation reactions. Heat and light exposure and oxygen availability can significantly impact essential oil integrity. The low temperature spray drying process of the present disclosure substantially mitigates the degrading effects of heat and oxidation on the encapsulated flavor oil, as is illustrated in the following examples.
In order to demonstrate some of the important advantages of the “no heat” spray dry process over traditional spray dry processing, flavor powders prepared by both methods were subjected to an accelerated aging test. The test powders were placed into an oven maintained at a temperature of 95° Fahrenheit. Once every seven days a sample of each powder was analyzed via gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis to determine the presence or absence of key molecular constituents. The flavor oil for analysis was extracted from the powder samples using standard procedures.
The results for both conventionally spray dried and no heat spray dried powders were also compared to a control sample of the starting neat flavor oil (“Neat Oil”) subjected to the same storage conditions as the powders. The test was run for a period of 9 weeks. This test simulates degradation processes that a powder will experience over its shelf life. The primary degradation processes are oxidation of key flavor molecules, with the oxidation products being the cause of spoilage and development of “off” taste in the product. The GC-MS comparison also reveals deficits in key flavor constituents due to evaporation that occurred during the spray dry processing as compared to the starting flavor oil control sample.
In this study a lemon-lime flavor oil was selected because it is highly representative of the key volatile essential oil flavor molecules (top notes) that are present in a wide range of citrus based flavors. These key flavor molecules are highly susceptible to oxidation, have low boiling points, and are easily evaporated.
The emulsions for both samples contained a 10% by weight load of the lemon-lime flavor oil. Both emulsions used a carrier starch and emulsifier. The spray drying emulsion in accordance with the present disclosure (Sample A, “Zoom”) contained 30% water, 6% starch emulsifier, and the remainder was 54% starch (all percentages by weight, based on total weight of the composition) and was spray dried at an inlet air temperature of 42° C. The sample for traditional spray dry processing (Sample B, “Spray”) was produced by Adron, Inc., (94 Fanny Rd, Boonton, N.J. 07005, USA), using the same lot of lemon lime flavor oil.
The most abundant and readily perceived molecule in citrus flavors is d-limonene. D-limonene is a volatile top note component, which adds to the fresh, light, lemon, orange, and sweet citrus notes in the flavor. A decrease of d-limonene concentration in the citrus flavor composition dramatically alters the citrus flavor in an undesirable manner. When citrus oils spoil it is primarily due to oxidation of d-limonene. Oxidation decreases the d-limonene concentration, thereby giving rise to various unwanted oxidation products, such as p-cymene, p-cymene-8ol, epoxides, menthadienols, and gamma-terpinene.
These results illustrate two important findings. First, the concentration of d-limonene in the traditional spray dried powder was lower than the control and the Zoom dried samples from the outset, reflecting the occurrence of evaporation that takes place during the traditional spray drying process due to the presence of heat as the powder is made. Second, as time progressed, the concentration of d-limonene continued to decrease in the traditionally spray dried sample, while the control neat oil and Zoom dried samples did not show any significant degradation.
Gamma-terpinene is normally present in lemon and lime oils, and contributes to the top note of the flavor. When gamma-terpinene oxidizes the principal oxidation product is para-cymene (p-cymene). The concentration of gamma-terpinene as a function of time is shown in
Terpineols are a small constituent of citrus oils, which contribute to heavier, less fresh tastes. It is well known that alpha and gamma terpineols can be produced from limonene. The increased presence of alpha and gamma terpineol indicate ongoing oxidation processes.
The formation of limonene and terpinolene epoxides and p-menthadienol are the result of oxidation processes. These unwanted byproducts form far more rapidly in traditional spray dry powders than in the control neat oil or the Zoom dried powder, as shown by the results in
Similar results are shown in
Trans- and cis-carveol are also formed as a result of oxidation of limonene. Their concentration in the neat oil is very low. When the concentration of these constituents becomes too high in a citrus oil, it indicates the occurrence of spoilage, and results in an off-taste.
This assessment involved the determination of the oxidation product p-cymene-8-ol in the control neat oil (“Neat Oil”), the traditional spray dried powder (Sample B, “Spray”) and the low temperature spray dried powder in accordance with present disclosure (Sample A, “Zoom”), as a function of time of exposure to hot air at a temperature of 95° F.
The results are shown in
The foregoing empirical results show the substantially increased stability of spray dried products that is achievable by the “no heat” spray drying process of the present disclosure. These results show that such no heat spray drying process achieves extremely low loss of volatile flavor components that would otherwise occur as a result of evaporation and that the incidence of oxidative reactions in the spray dried powders of the present disclosure are greatly reduced, as compared with the levels that occur in traditional spray dried products. The spray dried powder products of the present disclosure retain dramatically higher levels of highly volatile and critical top note components of flavor oils. As a result, the shelf lives of spray dried powder products of the present disclosure greatly exceed those of traditional spray dried powder products.
This is a continuation under 35 USC 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/606,771 filed Jan. 27, 2015 in the names of Charles P. Beetz, Robert Corbett, and David Salem for “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR LOW HEAT SPRAY DRYING,” which in turn is a continuation-in-part under 35 USC 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/245,369 filed Sep. 26, 2011 in the names of Charles P. Beetz, Robert Corbett, and David Salem for “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR LOW HEAT SPRAY DRYING,” and issued Jan. 27, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,939,388, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 USC 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/386,762, filed Sep. 27, 2010 in the names of Charles P. Beetz, Robert Corbett, and David Salem for “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR LOW HEAT SPRAY DRYING.” The disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/606,771 and 13/245,369 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/386,762 are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their respective entireties, for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1829477 | Douthitt | Oct 1925 | A |
2884049 | Barzelay | Apr 1959 | A |
2911036 | Lazar et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
2954293 | Rusoff | Sep 1960 | A |
3554768 | Feldman | Jan 1971 | A |
3615723 | Meade et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3655397 | Parliment et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3677321 | Felstead | Jul 1972 | A |
3679416 | Reich | Jul 1972 | A |
3740865 | Laguilharre | Jun 1973 | A |
3741273 | Meade | Jun 1973 | A |
3805869 | Winter et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3817308 | Bundo | Jun 1974 | A |
3840996 | Grindstaff et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3844969 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3886297 | Parliment et al. | May 1975 | A |
3920815 | Harvey et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3956521 | Pisecky et al. | May 1976 | A |
3962321 | Parliment et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3962384 | Cannalonga et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3963559 | Petersen et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3966975 | Hansen et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4001437 | Jaeggi et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4032465 | Bauer et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4062641 | Hovmand et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4070766 | Kamphuis | Jan 1978 | A |
4072570 | Williams | Feb 1978 | A |
4099982 | Hansen et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4141783 | Pisecky et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4198308 | Micciche | Apr 1980 | A |
4261793 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4276312 | Merritt | Jun 1981 | A |
4281024 | Hauberg et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4302481 | Ribnitz et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4362273 | Seino et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4420442 | Sands | Dec 1983 | A |
4422900 | Bordelon et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4438147 | Hedrick, Jr. | Mar 1984 | A |
4476042 | Sprecker et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4476147 | Hall et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4481221 | Mookherjee et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4481224 | Muralidhara et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4490403 | Pisecky et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4511592 | Percel et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4515987 | Boden et al. | May 1985 | A |
4520032 | Hall et al. | May 1985 | A |
4521613 | Pittet et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4521634 | Fujioka et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4522765 | Wiegers et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4524010 | Reuter et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4525364 | Wiegers et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4532145 | Saleeb et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4532364 | Fujioka et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535192 | Hall et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4537704 | Sprecker et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4539143 | Boden et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4539209 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4544775 | Fujioka et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4548821 | Hall et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4552770 | Pittet et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4565707 | Pittet et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4568538 | Boden et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4571344 | Pittet et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4600576 | Pittet et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613511 | Pittet et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4614831 | Sprecker et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619780 | Fujioka et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4620945 | Mookherjee et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4623538 | Pittet et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4623547 | Pittet et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4626440 | Pittet et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4629586 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4629805 | Sprecker et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4632831 | Hall | Dec 1986 | A |
4643903 | Sprecker et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4661281 | Seiter et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677207 | Boden et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4679733 | Lipp | Jul 1987 | A |
4680142 | Pittet et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4681976 | Sprecker et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4724121 | Weyand | Feb 1988 | A |
4762636 | Balliello et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4794193 | Pittet et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4804496 | Lowery et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4840801 | Mookherjee et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849125 | Seiter et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4865853 | Mookherjee et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4873112 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4883884 | Boden et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4892910 | Klesse et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4931203 | Ahmed et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936901 | Surgant et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4950495 | Boden et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962089 | Boden et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4983579 | Boden et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5004618 | Buckholz, Jr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5067655 | Farago | Nov 1991 | A |
5094860 | Newhall et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100509 | Pisecky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5124162 | Boskovic et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130149 | Keller et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137741 | Zampino et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5153011 | Patel et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5196219 | Hsu et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5227017 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5338553 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5354742 | Deming et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5391647 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5443829 | Kensil et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445839 | Hagiwara et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5462978 | Penzel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5506353 | Subramaniam | Apr 1996 | A |
5525367 | King et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5593715 | Christensen | Jan 1997 | A |
5596817 | Hansen | Jan 1997 | A |
5702749 | Sugiura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5723424 | Jennings | Mar 1998 | A |
5759599 | Wampler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773061 | Getler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786017 | Blake et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5840360 | Larsen | Nov 1998 | A |
5891473 | Stanier | Apr 1999 | A |
5968575 | Rasmussen | Oct 1999 | A |
6048565 | Getler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058624 | Bach et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077543 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6200949 | Reijmer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237247 | Van Den Meersche | May 2001 | B1 |
6251463 | Rossy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253463 | Hansen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325859 | De Roos et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335045 | Peters et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6387431 | Gautschi | May 2002 | B1 |
6391361 | Peters et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
RE37860 | Blake et al. | Sep 2002 | E |
6474573 | Kelly | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482433 | DeRoos et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497911 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6560897 | Chickering, III et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582728 | Platz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607771 | Benczedi et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607778 | Mutka et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6649267 | Agawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652898 | Jensen | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656394 | Kelly | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6689755 | Gabel et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723359 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734158 | Starkenmann | May 2004 | B2 |
6763607 | Beyerinck et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769200 | Raehse et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6838100 | Jaeger et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6902751 | Schleifenbaum et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6929814 | Bouwmeesters et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933265 | Marty | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6962006 | Chickering, III et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964385 | Kelly | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7022665 | Decorzant et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7090832 | Zanone et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097872 | Dewis et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128936 | Hansen | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7176176 | Pickenhagen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176177 | Lambrecht et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7204998 | Holzner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252848 | Gelin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7316826 | Kindel et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332468 | Widder et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348035 | Schleifenbaum et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7361376 | Dewis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7378121 | Ley et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7534460 | Dewis et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7651713 | Keller | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8939388 | Beetz | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9332776 | Beetz | May 2016 | B1 |
20020187221 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003212 | Chien et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021883 | Skiff | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030075012 | Knunz | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082272 | Bouwmeesters et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030192815 | Kelly | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196957 | Henningfield et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205629 | Kelly | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040062845 | Krawczyk et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040253343 | Ha et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031769 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050209443 | Bolen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050282728 | Narula et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060035008 | Virgallito et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060159818 | Kunieda | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060264130 | Karles et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070054837 | Weiss et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078071 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070117727 | Narula et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070166185 | Bartels | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184163 | Toth et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218179 | Ott et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231424 | Castro et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297993 | Kindel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008801 | Barnekow et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015264 | Schleifenbaum et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080057175 | Barnekow et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063747 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064625 | Holscher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081779 | Holscher | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107786 | Barnekow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113073 | Ley et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080199592 | Fexer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214675 | Ley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220140 | Ley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080227866 | Ley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241322 | Bunge | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080242585 | Ott et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080242740 | Ley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080292763 | Looft et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080305052 | Ley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317923 | Ley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090081140 | Brocke et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091049 | Nielsen | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092725 | Panten et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110796 | Backes et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124701 | Langer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090155445 | Le et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155446 | Reiss et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163403 | Levorse, Jr. et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163404 | Levorse, Jr. et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090252789 | Trophardy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090291176 | Nagao et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100055267 | Popplewell et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100196493 | Buisson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110059205 | Gaysinsky et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064783 | Bang-Madsen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130022728 | Popplewell et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140193562 | Popplewell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140205713 | Hans et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
549614 | Feb 1986 | AU |
1162699 | Feb 1984 | CA |
1334460 | Mar 1989 | CA |
1314432 | Mar 1993 | CA |
2171389 | Mar 1996 | CA |
2258751 | Dec 1997 | CA |
2253154 | May 1999 | CA |
2321660 | Sep 1999 | CA |
2407614 | Nov 2001 | CA |
2663386 | Apr 2008 | CA |
0322137 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0344375 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0232313 | May 1990 | EP |
0180366 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0420509 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0227486 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0515478 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0429482 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0461197 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0517423 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0366898 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0619075 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0832695 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1064856 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1106081 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1280591 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1435797 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2052622 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2138567 | Dec 2009 | EP |
675118 | Feb 1946 | GB |
1015599 | Jan 1966 | GB |
2364714 | Feb 2002 | GB |
62024 | Dec 1994 | IE |
9117821 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9428181 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9513864 | May 1995 | WO |
9517174 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9713416 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9714288 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9733485 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9804243 | Feb 1998 | WO |
0167897 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0207541 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2005063032 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006082536 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007054853 | May 2007 | WO |
2007096790 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007135583 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008047301 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008077399 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008113778 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2010104713 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011121468 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012122010 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition of ‘Hygroscopic’, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hygroscopic (Accessed: Nov. 17, 2015). |
Killeen, M., “The Process of Spray Drying and Spray Congealing”, “Pharmaceutical Engineering”, Jul./Aug. 1993, pp. 56, 58-62, 64, vol. 13. |
Langrish, T., et al., “Spray drying of food ingredients and applications of CFD in spray drying”, “Chemical Engineenng and Processing”, 2001, pp. 345-354, vol. 40. |
Leuenberger, H., “Spray freeze-drying—the process of choice for low water soluble drugs?”, “Journal of Nanoparticle Research”, 2002, pp. 111-119, vol. 4. |
Moeller, J., et al., “A Primer on Spray Drying”, “Chemical Engineering”, Nov. 2009, p. 34-40. |
Mumenthaler, M., et al., “Atmospheric spray-freeze drying: a suitable alternative in freeze-drying technology”, “International Journal of Pharmaceutics”, 1991, pp. 97-110, vol. 72. |
Rayleigh, L., “XX. On the Equilibrium of Liquid Conducting Masses Charged With Electricity”, “Philosophical Magazine Series 5”, 1882, pp. 184-186, vol. 14, No. 87. |
Sirignano, W., “Fluid Dynamics and Transport of Droplets and Sprays, Second Edition”, Jan. 2010, p. 34, Publisher: Cambridge University Press. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,369, filed Sep. 26, 2011. |
Westergaard, V., “The New Niro Integrated Filter Dryer IFD”, “Danish Dairy and Food Industry . . . worldwide”, Sep. 2002, pp. 62-64. |
Note: For the non-patent literature citations that no month of publication is indicated, the year of publication is more than 1 year prior to the effective filing date of the present application. |
Note: As to any co-pending U.S. applications cited herein, Applicant will provide at the examiner's request copies of any documents desired by the examiner from the USPTO file history of any such co-pending applications. |
Bailey, A., “Electrostatic Spraying of Liquids”, Apr. 1988, pp. 1-35, Publisher: Research Studies Press Ltd., Published in: Taunton, Somerset, England. |
Broadhead, J., et al., “The Spray Drying of Pharmaceuticals”, “Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy”, 1992, pp. 1169-1206, vol. 18, No. 11 and 12. |
Coumans, W., et al., “Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Aroma Retention in Spray Drying and Freeze Drying”, “Drying Technology”, 1994, pp. 99-149, vol. 12, No. 1 and 2. |
Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review (Paper #11) dated Dec. 15, 2015 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,939,388 (IPR2015-01418). |
Dobry, D., et al., “A Model-Based Methodology for Spray-Drying Process Development”, “J. Pharm. Innov.”, Jul. 25, 2009, pp. 133-142, vol. 4. |
Sea Processing Engineering, Inc., “GEA Powder Technology Division: Niro: Spray Drying”, Accessed via http://www.niroinc.com/html/drying/fdpdfs/480gbspraydrying.pdf, Aug. 22, 2002, pp. 1-15. |
Gohel, M., et al., “Spray Drying: A Review”, “Pharmaceutical Reviews”, Sep. 28, 2009, pp. 1-20, vol. 7, No. 5. |
Gomez, A., et al., “Charge and fission of droplets in electrostatic sprays”, “Phys. Fluids”, Jan. 1994, pp. 404-414, vol. 6, No. 1. |
Goula, A., et al., “Spray Drying of Tomato Pulp: Effect of Feed Concentration”, “Drying Technology”, 2004, pp. 2309-2330, vol. 22, No. 10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160223255 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61386762 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14606771 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15092561 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13245369 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14606771 | US |