The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for making coatings and articles from various material compositions involving use of ultrasonic spray as the core method of coating deposition. Ultrasonic spray deposition produces coatings that are more dense, more uniform, and thinner than coatings produced using other methods. These coatings may be used for a variety of applications, including for example coatings for cutting tools where toughness and wear resistance are important and thing coatings are necessary, coatings for biomedical implants, and other applications where thin and uniform coatings are needed.
In one embodiment of the present invention, ultrasonic spray deposition (USD) is used to deposit a base layer on the substrate, followed by chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) to introduce a binder phase that creates a composite coating with good adherence of the binder to the initial phase particles and adherence of the composite coating to the substrate. U.S. Pat. No. 6,607,782 issued Aug. 19, 2003 to Ajay P. Malshe, et al., disclosed a method that used electrostatic spray coating (ESC) to deposit the initial base layer, followed by CVI as the second step. The present invention, which uses USD followed by CVI as one embodiment, provides important advantages over the previously disclosed method, including:
We have used this process to create coatings consisting of cubic boron nitride (cBN), deposited using USD, and titanium nitride (TiN) applied using CVI in various embodiments. This process can be used with many materials not usable with other processes, including nitrides, carbides, carbonitrides, borides, oxides, sulphides and silicides.
In addition, other binding or post-deposition treatment processes can be applied as alternatives to CVI, depending on the substrate, the coating materials, and the application requirements of the coating, in various embodiments. This invention is directed in various embodiments to multiple methods for creating coatings, comprised of a single material or multiple materials in combination, using USD as the process for initial deposition of a base or green coating. Coatings can be applied to a variety of substrates including those with complex geometries. The application also describes apparatus or equipment designs used to perform ultrasonic spray deposition.
Disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for producing a coating on a substrate, beginning with ultrasonic spray deposition to deposit a base coating layer.
The deposition system 200 may use any of several methods to produce an initial coating or base layer on the substrate. One such deposition method is ultrasonic spray deposition (USD), described further below.
After the initial deposition step, dry solid particles of the coating material(s) are in contact with the substrate. The substrate with deposition 270 is the output of the deposition step 200 as illustrated in
The substrate 270 with deposition of a base layer then undergoes a post-deposition treatment step 300. Post-deposition treatment is used to bind the deposited dry particles to one another and to the substrate. Suitable treatment methods include:
Each of these methods applies one or more short bursts of high energy (microwave, laser, infrared, or high temperature and high pressure) to sinter the particles of the initial coating deposition, binding them to each other and to the substrate. These methods can allow binding of the green coating to the substrate with less exposure of the substrate to high temperatures for long periods of time.
Another binding method is use of high temperature-high pressure (HT-HP), a process that is currently used for a variety of purposes including fabrication of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) solid compacts. In this invention, HT-HP is used as a post-deposition binding step to bind the deposited particles to each other and to the substrate.
In some embodiments, an additional treatment step (not shown in the figures) is applied after the post-deposition treatment step 300, to add an additional phase to the coating. One example of this is the use of electrostatic spray coating or ultrasonic spray deposition as a final step, after deposition and sintering of a base coating, for the purpose of applying active biological agents to the base coating. As a more specific example, a dental implant or other biomedical device, possibly with a porous surface layer, can be coated using ESC or USD followed by microwave sintering of the base coating. Then in an additional post-sintering deposition step, an active agent can be applied, such as a biocidal or anti-bacterial agent, other active agents such as bone-morphogenic proteins, or particles carrying drugs for drug delivery at the surface of the device after implantation. These are just examples of how a post-processing step can be used to apply additional components to a base coating for specific purposes.
Other additional treatment steps (not shown in the figures) that can be applied after post-deposition treatment 300 can be used to enhance the binding of the coating and to reduce or eliminate defects and non-uniformities in the coating. For example, suitable treatments for hard coatings such as those used for cutting tools include high temperature-high pressure (HT-HP) and infrared sintering (pulsed infrared radiation). Other methods using transient energy sources also may be used to enhance the characteristics of the final coating on the substrate.
As shown in
The liquid used to create the dispersion can be chosen from among a number of suitable candidates, including methanol, ethanol, and the like. For ultrasonic spray of cubic boron nitride (cBN), we have used ethanol (C2H5OH) as the liquid. Ethanol has hydrophilic molecules or polar molecules, which helps to attach cBN particles with hygroscopic characteristics and to keep the particles suspended in the liquid. Other dispersants that are of polar characteristics can also be applied, or applied in combination with surfactants for further uniform dispersion.
An ultrasonic signal generator 240 is connected to a piezoelectric element within the atomizer 235. The piezoelectric element converts the ultrasonic signal into mechanical action that atomizes the liquid dispersion into droplets, which are fed to a nozzle 245. By adjusting the frequency of the ultrasonic signal, the size of the resulting droplets can be adjusted. Higher frequencies produce smaller droplets. For example, in one embodiment a frequency of 125 KHz is used, which produces droplets that have a median size of about 20 microns.
The nozzle directs the droplets toward the substrate or part to be coated, 170. The liquid in the droplets evaporates, either in transit toward the substrate or after deposition on the substrate or a combination of the two. The result is a dry powder deposition of coating material(s) on the substrate. As an option, a gas flow (using air, nitrogen, or other suitable gas) may be introduced around the exit of the nozzle to further direct the droplet spray toward the surface. This can improve the speed of deposition as well as increase the efficiency of material deposition (fraction of material that is deposited on the substrate). The gas may be heated to speed up evaporation of the liquid.
Ultrasonic spray deposition (USD) offers several advantages over electrostatic spray coating (ESC) that make USD more suitable for some applications. Compared to ESC, USD can be used to create thinner coatings. Also, because the coating material is dispersed in a liquid that tends to de-agglomerate the material, and the ultrasonic atomization process itself tends to break up agglomerates, the resulting deposition is more uniform with a smoother surface. We also have found that we are able to create higher density coatings with USD, i.e., the volumetric fraction of coating material in the coating preform can be made higher with USD than with ESC.
In this embodiment, the droplets are given an electrostatic charge by positioning one or more conducting electrodes 265 near the exit of the ultrasonic spray nozzle 245. By applying a high voltage to the electrode(s), using an adjustable high voltage generator 260, and grounding the substrate 170 (the substrate must have a surface with a certain conductivity), the droplets exiting the ultrasonic nozzle are charged and follow the electric field lines to the substrate. A variety of shapes and configurations can be used for the electrode, including a circular or elliptical collar, as well as one or more point electrodes arranged near the nozzle exit.
By adjusting the positioning of the nozzle 245, electrode 265 and substrate 170 and adjusting the voltage, electrode-substrate distance, ultrasonic frequency (influencing droplet size) and spray pressure from the pressure delivery system 220, the balance between electrostatic influence and the ultrasonic spray of the droplets can be altered to provide the characteristics needed for a given coating application. Adjusting the voltage level and the distance between the spray nozzle and the substrate can modify the transit time for droplets between nozzle and substrate. As an option, the carrier gas can be heated, affecting the rate at which droplets evaporate during transit. These various adjustments can be used to optimize the process such that the desired balance is achieved between dry deposition (droplets have evaporated prior to reaching the substrate) and wet deposition (droplets are still liquid when they deposit on the surface), allowing all dry, all wet, or hybrid wet/dry deposition to be used depending on what is best for the application.
This approach combines the positive aspects of both ultrasonic spray deposition (USD) and electrostatic charging, which provides several advantages:
A key part of the pressure delivery system for ultrasonic spray deposition is an ultrasonic tank, which maintains a suspension of particles within a dispersant for delivery to the ultrasonic spray system.
The vessel is pressurized using compressed air, nitrogen or other suitable gas under pressure, which enters the vessel at the compressed air inlet (5). For some applications, maintaining control of the humidity level or dew point of the gas may be required. As an option, the gas can be pre-heated to speed up the removal of the dispersant in the course of deposition. A pressure relief valve (7) is provided as a safety measure to prevent the vessel or other parts of the pressurized assembly from being over-pressurized and potentially leaking or rupturing.
The particle suspension exits the pressure vessel through a fluid pickup tube (6). The distance between the bottom of the fluid pickup tube and the bottom of the pressure vessel can be adjusted to ensure that fluid is drawn from a location within the pressure vessel that has consistent particle density and good suspension. Liquid level indication (not shown in the figure) is provided external to the pressure vessel.
As an option, the ultrasonic tank can employ any of a variety of means for maintaining a uniform dispersion of the particles. For example, in one embodiment shown in the figure, a commercial ultrasonic water bath (1) is used to surround the pressure vessel with sonicated water (2), which imparts ultrasonic vibrations to the pressure vessel and the suspension within. Other examples include use of mechanical vibrators attached to a surrounding bath or to the pressure vessel, an ultrasonic vibrator stick or similar device immersed in the suspension inside the vessel, mechanical stirrers, and other vibration or sonication means.
The chamber is sealed so as to prevent egress of the coating material or ingress of contaminants. Material that is not deposited on the substrate(s) is collected in a powder recycling collector (5) so that material may be recycled. In the preferred embodiment, the unused material exits the sealed chamber via a liquid bath or by other filtering mean so that the material is captured for re-use and is prevented from being released to the environment.
In a preferred embodiment, the adjustments provided on the stage suspension assembly (3) are located external to the chamber by extending the assembly through the top of the chamber through openings that are sealed using O-ring type seals or other sealing means. With this design, adjustments in stage-to-nozzle distance can be made without opening the chamber.
As the sun plate rotates, the planetary gears move around the central axis of the assembly and, due to their interaction with the internal ring gear, the planetary gears also rotate on their own axes. Substrates are mounted on the individual planetary gear stages. The dual rotation action enhances the uniformity of the deposition on the substrate by ensuring that all points on the surface of the substrate are exposed equally to the material spray.
The planetary and ring gears can mesh using conventional gear teeth, or the planetary gears can be made as rollers that are pressed outward (e.g., by springs) such that the outer edge of each roller contacts the surface of the internal ring gear and friction causes the planetary gears to rotate.
For any type of electrostatic deposition, the planetary gears must be grounded in order to ground the substrate that is mounted on them. This requires that a means be provided to electrically connect the planetary gears to a grounded member. In one embodiment in which the planetary gears are rollers, the springs that press against the planetary gear shafts and hold the planetary gears against the internal ring gear also act as brushes to make an electrical connection between the planetary gears and the rest of the grounded rotating stage assembly.
The speed of the electric motor can be adjusted to ensure that the substrate to be coated is exposed to all parts of the deposition spray pattern equally in order to achieve the desired uniformity of coating. The speed can be adjusted by changing the power input (voltage) to the DC motor. In the specific embodiment shown in the figure, the ratio of the rotational speed of the planetary gears to that of the overall sun plate is fixed by the gear ratio. However, in alternative embodiments one or more additional motors or other means can be provided such that the two speeds can be adjusted independently.
The rotating stage also can be translated by mounting it on an appropriate platform that is moved laterally in either the x or the y direction, and the stage also can be translated in the z-axis direction (vertical direction in the figure), moving the rotating stage closer to or further away from the spray source.
The same arrangement is used for ultrasonic spray deposition with electrostatic charging. In that case, an electrode and adjustable voltage source are provided and the substrate is grounded to provide electric field-assisted ultrasonic deposition. A commercial high-voltage generator available for ESC systems can be used; however, we have found that some modification is required for this application, namely modifying the voltage generator so that it can be applied to dispersants that have widely different dielectric constants.
Other optional features that can be included in the system described here are:
This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2007/022221, filed 18 Oct. 2007, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/852,863, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Making Coatings Using Ultrasonic Spray Deposition,” and filed on Oct. 19, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2007/022221 | 10/18/2007 | WO | 00 | 10/26/2010 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008/051434 | 5/2/2008 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4031278 | Patel | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4105571 | Shaub et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4168241 | Kozima et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4334928 | Hara et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4485759 | Brandolf | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4715972 | Pacholke | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4745010 | Sarin et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4842893 | Yializis et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4877677 | Hirochi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4940521 | Dinter | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5097800 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102592 | McCauley et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5129918 | Chattopadhay | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5273790 | Herb et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5286565 | Holzl et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5328875 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330854 | Singh et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5363821 | Rao et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5389118 | Hinterman et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5391422 | Omori et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5407464 | Kaliski | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5441762 | Gray et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451260 | Versteeg et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5466642 | Tajima et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5500331 | Czekai et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5503913 | Konig et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5534808 | Takaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5614140 | Pinneo | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5677060 | Terentieva et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679399 | Shlenker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687905 | Tsai | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5704556 | McLaughlin | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5733609 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5766783 | Utsumi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5800866 | Myers et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5830813 | Yao et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5834689 | Cook | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5882777 | Kukino et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889219 | Moriguchi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897751 | Makowiccki et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902671 | Kutscher | May 1999 | A |
| 5928771 | DeWald, Jr. et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5945166 | Singh et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5985356 | Schultz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004617 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6196910 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217843 | Homyonfer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6240873 | Bertellotti et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258139 | Jensen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258237 | Gal-Or et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6346290 | Schultz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6368665 | Hunt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372012 | Majagi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6410086 | Brandon et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6450393 | Doumanidis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6484826 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6540800 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6544599 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6607782 | Malshe et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6756119 | Clough | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6852948 | Harrison | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6861088 | Weber et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6864201 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6933049 | Wan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6933263 | Manka et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6962895 | Scharf et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7018606 | Tenne et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018958 | Arrowsmith et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7022653 | Hartley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034091 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7052532 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7060319 | Fredrickson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7247346 | Sager et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7250195 | Storey et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7442665 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 20020086189 | Pham et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176989 | Knudsen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003237 | Seabaugh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030025014 | Sun et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162179 | Potyrailo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030219544 | Smith et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040018238 | Shukla | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038808 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040228963 | Bergh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050064088 | Fredrickson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050072266 | Zaech | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079200 | Rathenow et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123759 | Weinberg et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233062 | Hossainy et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244644 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260455 | Xin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008589 | Lin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120947 | Tenne et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144335 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177573 | Pui et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193890 | Owens et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198940 | McMorrow | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198941 | Behan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198942 | O'Connor et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199013 | Malshe et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060219294 | Yabuuchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060275542 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003749 | Asgari | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070004884 | Bildstein | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057138 | Esser | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065668 | Idei | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154634 | Renn | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070224239 | Behan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080029625 | Talton | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050450 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066375 | Roos et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080166493 | Xiao et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280141 | Dobbs et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080305259 | Saijo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311306 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312111 | Malshe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090014062 | Kayama | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 60153113 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| 03274283 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 4290578 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 6297429 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| 2004267893 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2005307277 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006231169 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 0039358 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 2005071704 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Zhi et al., SnO2 Nanoparticle-Functionalized Boron Nitride Nanotubes, Published on Web Apr. 12, 2006, J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 8548-8550. |
| Nguyen, H.Q. et al., “Nano-enamel: a new way to produce glass-like protective coatings for metals,” Materials and Corrosion 53, 772-782 (2002). |
| European Search Report for EP07852841 (dated May 30, 2014). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110033609 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60852863 | Oct 2006 | US |