This patent application is related to, commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/016,524 entitled “Flexible Track Drilling Machine” filed Dec. 10, 2001, and to the following concurrently-filed, commonly-owned U.S. patent applications: “Methods and Apparatus for Counterbalance-Assisted Manufacturing Operations” bearing patent application Ser. No. 10/606,443 “Methods and Apparatus for Track Members Having a Neutral-Axis Rack” bearing patent application Ser. No. 10/606,625 “Apparatus and Methods for Manufacturing Operations Using Non-Contact Position Sensing” bearing patent application Ser. No. 10/606,473 and “Apparatus and Methods for Servo-Controlled Manufacturing Operations” bearing patent application Ser. No. 10/606,402.
The present disclosure relates to methods and apparatus for manufacturing operations using opposing-force support systems, and more specifically, to methods and apparatus for drilling operations on aircraft fuselage sections using adjacent hole clamp-up systems.
The fabrication of large structures may involve the drilling of a large number of holes in the components of the structure. Conventional structures that require a large number of drilling operations include, for example, aircraft, missiles, ships, railcars, sheet metal buildings, and other similar structures. In particular, conventional aircraft fabrication processes typically involve the drilling of a large number of holes in wing sections of the aircraft to allow these sections to be attached to each other and to the airframe.
A variety of devices have been developed to facilitate drilling operations involving the drilling of a large number of holes. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,763 issued to Jack et al. discloses a drilling system that includes a pair of rails temporarily attached to an aircraft fuselage. A support carriage is slideably coupled to the rails and supports a drill assembly. A template attached to the aircraft fuselage provides an index for the desired locations of the holes that are to be formed in the aircraft fuselage. As the carriage is moved along the rails, a locking mechanism (or trigger) interacts with the template to securely position the carriage for a subsequent drilling operation.
Although desirable results have been achieved using the prior art drilling systems, some disadvantages have been noted. For example, the performance of prior art drill assemblies may be reduced when operating on relatively lighter, more flexible structures. In such cases, drill thrust may become too high and may cause undesirable bending or structural deflection of the workpiece, which may in turn result in reduced hole quality. Also, on such relatively light, flexible structures, the forces applied by the drilling system on the structure may require careful control to avoid overexertion against the structure. This may slow the manufacturing operation and reduce throughput. For the foregoing reasons, an unmet need exists for an improved support assembly for performing manufacturing operations, including drilling operations.
The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods for manufacturing operations using opposing-force support systems, and more specifically, to methods and apparatus for drilling operations on aircraft fuselage sections using hole clamp-up systems. Apparatus and methods in accordance with the present invention may advantageously prevent deflections of a workpiece during a manufacturing operation, thereby improving the accuracy, consistency, efficiency, and throughput of the manufacturing operation.
In one embodiment, an apparatus for supporting a manufacturing tool relative to a workpiece includes a track assembly adapted to be attached to the workpiece, and a carriage moveably coupled to the track assembly. The carriage includes a tool support adapted to receive and support a manufacturing tool. An opposing-force support assembly is operatively coupled to the carriage and is adapted to be secured to the workpiece. The opposing-force support assembly at least partially counterbalances a manufacturing force exerted on the workpiece by the manufacturing tool.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for manufacturing operations using opposing-force support systems. Many specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following description and in
With continued reference to
Similarly, the y-axis carriage 124 includes a support member 136 slideably coupled to a slot 138 disposed in the base member 126 of the x-axis carriage 122 (
As best shown in
It will be appreciated that the clamp-up actuator 162 may be any type of suitable actuator, including a hydraulic, pneumatic, or electrically-driven actuator. Similarly, the first, second and third actuators 166, 176, 178 may be hydraulic, pneumatic, electric, or any other suitable type of actuators. In one particular embodiment, the first, second and third actuators 166, 176, 178 are so-called “return to home” pneumatic actuators that are coupled by one or more pneumatic supply lines 179 (
In operation, the manufacturing assembly 100 may be mounted onto the workpiece 102 and vacuum may be provided to the vacuum assemblies 114, thereby securing the track assembly 110 in a desired position. A hole 103 may be formed in the workpiece 102 in any desired manner, such as during fabrication of the workpiece 102, or using the tool assembly 150 or another drilling device. Next, the clamp-up pin 164 may be positioned in the hole 103. The positioning of the clamp-up pin 164 into the hole 103 may be accomplished in a variety of ways. For example, the position of the clamp-up pin 164 along the x-axis may be accomplished by controllably positioning the x-axis carriage 122 using the first drive motor 130, or controllably positioning the first baseplate 168 along the first auxiliary rails 170 using the second actuator 176, or by a combination of both of these methods. Similarly, the position of the clamp-up pin 164 along the y-axis may be accomplished by controllably positioning the y-axis carriage 124 using the second drive motor 140, or by controllably actuating the first actuator 166, or both. Finally, the position of the clamp-up pin 164 along the z-axis may be accomplished by controllably positioning the second baseplate 172 along the second auxiliary rails 174 using the third actuator 178. In one particular embodiment, the x-axis and y-axis carriages 122, 124 are employed to perform coarse, relatively large scale positioning, and the second and first actuators 176, 166 are used to provide finer, relatively small scale positioning of the clamp-up pin 164 along the x- and y-axes, respectively.
The above-described positioning of the opposing-force support assembly 160 may be accomplished in an automated or semi-automated manner using the controller 134 equipped with conventional, computerized numerically-controlled (CNC) methods and algorithms. Alternately, the positioning may be performed manually by an operator, such as, for example, by temporarily disabling or neutralizing the above-referenced motors and actuators of the carriage and clamp-up assemblies 120, 160 to permit the opposing-force support assembly 160 to be positioned manually.
With further reference to
After one or more manufacturing operations have been performed on the workpiece 102, the opposing-force support assembly 160 may be detached from the workpiece 102 by deactivating the clamp-up actuator 162 and removing the clamp-up pin 164 from the hole 103. If desired, the opposing-force support assembly 160 may then be repositioned to a new location and may be secured again to the workpiece 102 by inserting the clamp-up pin 164 into a different hole 103 (such as one of the newly formed holes) and actuating the opposing-force support assembly 160 in the manner described above. With the opposing-force support assembly 160 secured to the workpiece 102 in the new location, additional manufacturing operations may be conducted on the workpiece 102 as desired.
Manufacturing assemblies having opposing support systems in accordance with the teachings of the present invention may advantageously improve the quality of manufacturing operations on a workpiece. Because the opposing-force support assembly 160 opposingly supports (or counterbalances) the workpiece during the application of forces on the workpiece by the tool assembly 150, the workpiece 102 may be less likely to bend or deflect during the manufacturing process, especially for relatively thin or relatively flexible workpieces. Since deflections of the workpiece 102 may be reduced or eliminated, the orientation of the tool assembly 150 with respect to the workpiece 102 may be more easily maintained by the carriage assembly 120. Thus, the manufacturing operations may be more accurately and consistently conducted using the manufacturing assembly 100. Because the manufacturing operations may be more accurately and consistently performed, the costs associated with inspecting and reworking the workpiece 102 during the manufacturing operation may be reduced.
The manufacturing assembly 100 having the opposing-force support assembly 160 may also improve the speed with which manufacturing operations may be performed. Because the opposing-force support assembly 160 provides opposing support to the workpiece 102 during manufacturing operations, the tool assembly 150 may be more forcefully applied to the workpiece 102. In this way, the speed with which the manufacturing operations are performed may be increased, and the efficiency and throughput of the manufacturing operations may be improved.
It will be appreciated that a wide variety of suitable embodiments of opposing support assemblies 160 may be conceived in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. For example, a variety of clamp-up pins 164 and clamp-up actuators 162 are known that may be employed to secure the opposing-force support assembly 160 to the workpiece 102, including, for example, a collet device of the type generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,396,318 issued to Jensen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,187 issued to Slesinski et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,036,409 issued to Rissler, or a clamping device of the type generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,482,411 issued to McGlasson and U.S. Pat. No. 6,283,684 B1 issued to Jarvis. In one alternate embodiment, the hole 103 may be a threaded hole 103, and the clamp-up pin 164 may be a threaded member that threadedly engages the threaded hole 103. In further embodiments, the clamp-up pin 164 and clamp-up actuator 162 may be replaced with any other suitable securing devices, including one or more of the above-referenced vacuum cup assemblies 114, magnets, or other electro-magnetic apparatus, such as, for example, an apparatus that exerts a force on a workpiece in a manner similar to the electromagnetic dent remover apparatus commercially-available from Electroimpact, Inc. of Everett, Wash.
It may also be appreciated that manufacturing assemblies in accordance with the present invention, including the particular embodiment of the manufacturing assembly 100 described above, may be used to provide opposing support to a wide variety of manufacturing tools, and that the teachings of the present invention are not limited simply to manufacturing operations that involve drilling. For example, manufacturing assemblies having opposing support assemblies in accordance with the present invention may be used to support riveters, mechanical and electromagnetic dent pullers, welders, wrenches, clamps, sanders, nailers, screw guns, or virtually any other desired type of manufacturing tools or measuring instruments.
It may also be appreciated that a variety of alternate embodiments of apparatus and methods may be conceived in accordance with the present invention, and that the invention is not limited to the particular apparatus and methods described above and shown in the accompanying figures. For example, it may be noted that the carriage assembly 120 and the track assembly 110 may assume a wide variety of alternate embodiments. For example, in one embodiment, the opposing-force support assembly 160 may be coupled to the rail and carriage assembly taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,763 issued to Jack et al. In yet another embodiment, the opposing-force support assembly 160 may be used in combination with any of the carriage assemblies and track assemblies disclosed in co-pending, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/016,524, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Specifically,
The widths of the rails 22, 24 extend substantially parallel to the surface of the workpiece 102 when the vacuum cup assemblies 114 are attached to the workpiece surface 102. Because the rails 22, 24 may bend relatively easily about the widthwise directions and to twist about their longitudinal axes, the rails 22, 24 may flex and twist as needed to substantially follow the surface of the workpiece 102 and the vacuum cup assemblies 114 maintain each rail at a substantially constant distance from the surface of the workpiece 102. In this manner, the major surfaces of the rails 22, 24 may be substantially perpendicular to the surface normal of the workpiece 102 at any point along each rail.
With continued reference to
The spring plates 34, 36 on which the rollers 32 are mounted may flex and twist as needed (i.e. as dictated by the contour of the workpiece surface 102 as the carriage assembly 220 traverses the rails 22, 24) to allow a limited degree of relative movement to occur between the x-axis carriage 30 and the rollers 32. This is facilitated by making the spring plates 34, 36 relatively narrow at their middles and wider at their ends, so that the plates 34, 36 preferentially bend and twist at approximately the middle rather than at the ends where the rollers 32 are mounted. Thus, a limited degree of relative movement can occur between the x-axis carriage 30 and the rails 22, 24. The net result is that the x-axis carriage 30 enables the carriage assembly 220 to traverse the rails 22, 24 along the x-axis (i.e. the axis parallel to the length direction of the rails 22, 24) even though the rails 22, 24 may be bending and twisting in somewhat different ways relative to each other. In effect, the rails 22, 24 conform to the contour of the workpiece 102 and thus approximate a normal to the surface at any point along the path defined by the rails 22, 24. Consequently, a reference axis of the carriage assembly 220 (in the illustrated embodiment, a z-axis normal to the plane of the x-axis carriage 30) is maintained substantially normal to the workpiece 102 at any position of the carriage assembly 220 along the rails 22, 24.
As best shown in
To improve accuracy of the x-axis position of the carriage assembly 220, the pinion gear 44 may have a constant height relative to the rack 38 at any point along the reference rail 24. To accomplish this height control, the rotation axis of the pinion gear 44 may preferably lie in the same plane as that defined by the rotational axes of the two rollers 32 mounted on the end of the spring plate 36. More particularly, the axes of the rollers 32 may be substantially parallel to each other and substantially normal to the workpiece surface 102, and the axis of the pinion gear 44 may be substantially parallel to the workpiece surface 102 and may lie in the plane of the roller axes.
As further shown in
As shown in
In operation, the opposing-force support assembly 160 described above with reference to
While specific embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should not be limited by the disclosure of the specific embodiments set forth above. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1676206 | Ratliff | Jul 1928 | A |
1741044 | Whipple et al. | Dec 1929 | A |
2151205 | Hawn | Mar 1939 | A |
RE21795 | Verderber | May 1941 | E |
2911860 | Winslow et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
2946246 | Allan | Jul 1960 | A |
2963927 | Hanger | Dec 1960 | A |
3348248 | Milkert | Oct 1967 | A |
3456738 | Harry | Jul 1969 | A |
3575364 | Frederick | Apr 1971 | A |
3592095 | Passa et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3599958 | Schindler | Aug 1971 | A |
3627436 | Adams et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3633433 | Schurch | Jan 1972 | A |
3663115 | Vindez et al. | May 1972 | A |
3732608 | Knopf | May 1973 | A |
3874244 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3935985 | Prudhomme et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3990689 | Eklund, Sr. | Nov 1976 | A |
4031931 | Balcombe | Jun 1977 | A |
4091712 | Geiger | May 1978 | A |
4123187 | Turner | Oct 1978 | A |
4149822 | Lehmkuhl | Apr 1979 | A |
4268949 | Sato | May 1981 | A |
4353308 | Brown | Oct 1982 | A |
4388890 | Wester et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396318 | Jensen et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4468159 | Oster | Aug 1984 | A |
4561814 | Dahlgren et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4570542 | Cable et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4591301 | Pelfrey | May 1986 | A |
4599018 | Woods | Jul 1986 | A |
4686397 | Becker | Aug 1987 | A |
4720897 | Orrell et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4740117 | Schaff Deleury et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4761876 | Kosmowski | Aug 1988 | A |
4778317 | Earle, III et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787786 | Freud et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4850763 | Jack et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4932814 | York | Jun 1990 | A |
4958967 | Adachi | Sep 1990 | A |
5032051 | Gilmore | Jul 1991 | A |
5062746 | Deremo | Nov 1991 | A |
5072948 | Kostrezewski | Dec 1991 | A |
5173015 | Maynard | Dec 1992 | A |
5297907 | Strait et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5323962 | Jassby et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5348429 | Pfister | Sep 1994 | A |
5352069 | Rourke | Oct 1994 | A |
5383751 | Wheetley et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390557 | Tsukada | Feb 1995 | A |
5395187 | Slesinski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403133 | Kim | Apr 1995 | A |
5468099 | Wheetley et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477597 | Catania et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482411 | McGlasson | Jan 1996 | A |
5537927 | Rogovein et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542796 | Bratten et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573076 | McCannon, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582067 | Snider | Dec 1996 | A |
5609444 | Valsecchi | Mar 1997 | A |
5661892 | Catania et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664311 | Banks et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5697413 | Fuller | Dec 1997 | A |
5934848 | Hamalainen | Aug 1999 | A |
6007278 | Arsenault | Dec 1999 | A |
6036409 | Rissler | Mar 2000 | A |
6073326 | Banks et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6210084 | Banks et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220099 | Marti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240332 | Buttrick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283684 | Jarvis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309145 | Tremblay et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334745 | Bennett, Sr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357101 | Sarh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382889 | Brown et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413022 | Sarh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428452 | Dahlstrom et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428453 | Hoppe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430796 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439813 | Repossini | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467385 | Buttrick et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494307 | Kozak et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505393 | Stoewer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547496 | Chun et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550129 | Buttrick, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6612792 | Barclay | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6634838 | Kitamura et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6796014 | Sarh | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6843328 | Boyle-Davis et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6855099 | Hazlehurst et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6902362 | Ferrari et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6926094 | Arntson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
20020001511 | Reguzzi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020127069 | Luigi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168241 | David et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030207742 | Hazlehurst et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040076484 | Alam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040234352 | Vanderpol et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245879 | Hirzel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050158134 | Roders | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19834702 | Feb 2000 | DE |
55120910 | Sep 1980 | JP |
58028442 | Feb 1983 | JP |
64-064711 | Mar 1989 | JP |
05318218 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05-318215 | Dec 1993 | JP |
01-210207 | Aug 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040265077 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |