Methods and apparatus for minimally invasive modular interbody fusion devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11491023
  • Patent Number
    11,491,023
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 4, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 8, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
The invention is a modular interbody fusion device for fusing adjacent spinal vertebrae that is adapted to be implanted in a prepared interbody space including a first modular segment having a width including a first rail extending at least partially along one side of the width and beyond a periphery of a body portion of the first modular segment, a second modular segment having a width and slidably connected to the first rail on one side of the width and having a second rail extending at least partially along another side of the width and beyond a periphery of a body portion of the second modular segment, a third modular segment having a width and slidably connected to the second rail on one side of the width and wherein the device has an expanded position in which the second and third modular segments are extended along the first and second rails and positioned in a generally end to end configuration spaced apart by the rails prior to implantation and an implanted position in which the modular segments are positioned in a generally side by side configuration that defines a unitary body that mimics the planar shape of the vertebra such that the device contacts and supports the adjacent vertebra.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to an implantable orthopedic fusion device for fusing joints in a patient such as a vertebral interbody fusion device. More particularly, the present invention relates to a rail-based modular interbody fusion device of predetermined size and shape.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Joint fusion or arthrodesis is a common approach to alleviate the pain due to deteriorated and/or arthritic joints. Joint fusion involves inducing bone growth between two otherwise mobile bones in a joint, which alleviates pain by immobilizing and stabilizing the joint. The joint is generally fused in its most functional position. The ankle, wrist, finger, toe, knee and vertebral joints are all examples of joints that may be fused to alleviate pain associated with unstable, deteriorated joints.


The spinal motion segment consists of two adjacent vertebral bodies, the interposed intervertebral disc, as well as the attached ligaments, muscles, bony processes and the facet joints. The disc consists of the end plates at the surfaces of the vertebral bones, the soft inner core, called the nucleus pulposus and the annulus fibrosus ligament that circumferentially surrounds the nucleus and connects the vertebrae together. In normal discs, the nucleus cushions applied loads, thus protecting the other elements of the spinal motion segment. The nucleus in a normal disc responds to compression forces by bulging outward against the vertebral end plates and the annulus fibrosus. The annulus consists of collagen fibers and a smaller amount of elastic fibers, both of which are effective in resisting tension forces. However, the annulus on its own is not very effective in withstanding compression and shear forces.


As people age the intervertebral discs often degenerate naturally. Degeneration of the intervertebral discs may also occur in people as a result of degenerative disc disease. Degenerative disc disease of the spine is one of the most common conditions causing back pain and disability in our population. When a disc degenerates, the nucleus dehydrates. When a nucleus dehydrates, its ability to act as a cushion is reduced. Because the dehydrated nucleus is no longer able to bear loads, the loads are transferred to the annulus and to the facet joints. The annulus and facet joints are not capable of withstanding their increased share of the applied compression and torsional loads, and as such, they gradually deteriorate. As the annulus and facet joints deteriorate, many other effects ensue, including the narrowing of the interspace, bony spur formation, fragmentation of the annulus, fracture and deterioration of the cartilaginous end plates, and deterioration of the cartilage of the facet joints. The annulus and facet joints lose their structural stability and subtle but pathologic motions occur between the spinal bones. As the annulus loses stability it tends to bulge outward and may develop a tear allowing nucleus material to extrude. Breakdown products of the disc, including macroscopic debris, microscopic particles, and noxious biochemical substances build up. The particles and debris may produce sciatica and the noxious biochemical substances can irritate sensitive nerve endings in and around the disc and produce low back pain. Affected individuals experience muscle spasms, reduced flexibility of the low back, and pain when ordinary movements of the trunk are attempted.


Degeneration of a disc is irreversible. In some cases, the body will eventually stiffen the joints of the motion segment, effectively re-stabilizing the discs. Even in the cases where re-stabilization occurs, the process can take many years and patients often continue to experience disabling pain. Extended painful episodes of longer than three months often leads patients to seek a surgical solution for their pain.


Several methods have been devised to attempt to stabilize the spinal motion segment. Some of these methods include: applying rigid or semi-rigid support members on the sides of the motion segment; removing and replacing the entire disc with an articulating artificial device; removing and replacing the nucleus; and spinal fusion involving permanently fusing the vertebrae adjacent the affected disc.


Spinal fusion is generally regarded as an effective surgical treatment to alleviate back pain due to degeneration of a disc. The fusion process requires that the vertebral endplates be prepared by scraping the surface of the existing vertebral bone to promote bleeding and release of bone growth factors, and placing additional bone or suitable bone substitute onto the prepared surface. Devices of an appropriate size made from rigid materials such as metals (including titanium and tantalum), some plastics (including polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or carbon fiber-filled PEEK), and allograft bone (primarily from donor femurs) are commonly inserted into the prepared disc cavity as part of the interbody fusion procedure to help distract and stabilize the disc space and put the vertebra into proper position while the bone growth process takes place.


The interbody fusion procedure may be accomplished from an anterior, transforaminal, or a posterior surgical approach.


Most devices used in interbody spinal fusion require a relatively large opening that is typically larger than the dimensions of the rigid and unitary fusion device or cage that is to be inserted, examples of such devices include, U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,373 to Ray et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,638 to Kuslich et al., and the NOVEL™ PEEK Spacers from Alphatec. In fact, many methods of interbody fusion, for example the method and device described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,327 to Brantigan, require bilateral placement of unitary devices through fairly large surgical openings. As with any surgical procedure, the larger the surgical access required, the higher the risk of infection and trauma to the surrounding anatomy.


There exists minimally invasive spinal fusion devices such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,679 to Kuslich and U.S. Pat. No. 6,997,929 to Manzi et al. The device disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,679 is a porous mesh bag that is filled in situ. The U.S. Pat. No. 6,997,929 is directed to a series of wafers that are vertically stacked to distract and support the vertebral endplates. U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,454 to Baumgartner discloses plastic beads which may be inserted one at a time into an intervertebral space on a flexible string. Further, U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,326 to Bao discloses hydrogel beads encased in a semi-permeable membrane.


While such minimally invasive technologies permit smaller access incision through the annulus (i.e. an annulotomy) to be used in a fusion procedure, the resulting fusion devices do not have the mechanical and dimensional features of the more rigid unitary fusion devices used in traditional surgical approaches and are less able to distract and stabilize the disc space. Thus, there is a need for a minimally invasive spinal fusion implant that could better emulate the mechanical and structural characteristics of a rigid unitary fusion device.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method and apparatus for a rail-based modular interbody fusion device having a predetermined size and shape when assembled in situ. In one embodiment, the modular interbody fusion device comprises generally solid modular segments with rails that operably connect adjacent modular segments. This configuration allows the interbody spacer to be adapted for implantation via a small access incision or annulotomy.


through various surgical approaches, including a posterior or a lateral approach. In one embodiment, the rails operate with a sliding mechanism to connect and interlock adjacent modular segments. A stem portion of the rails that extends beyond the periphery of the body of the prosthesis is removable after implantation such that the modular segments combine to form a single device with a relatively smooth outer circumference when assembled in situ. The modular fusion device can be configured to provide full contact with and closely mimic the geometry of the surfaces of the joint being fused so as to more closely mimic the functionality of the largest existing rigid and unitary fusion devices.


In one embodiment, an interbody modular fusion device is adapted to be implanted in a prepared intervertebral space and includes at least three modular segments each having a width. The first modular segment has a first rail extending at least partially along one side of the width and beyond a periphery of the first modular segment. The second modular segment is slidably connected to the first rail on one side of the width and has a second rail extending at least partially along another side of the width and beyond a periphery of the second modular segment. The third modular segment is slidably connected to the second rail on one side of the width. The interbody fusion device has an expanded position in which the modular segments are extended along the first and second rails and positioned in a generally end to end configuration spaced apart by the rails prior to implantation. The interbody fusion device also has an implanted position in which the modular segments are positioned in a generally side by side configuration that defines a single assembled body having a generally continuous periphery that generally corresponds to the inner boundary of the annulus.


In one embodiment, each modular segment has a compressive modulus in the superior to inferior direction from about 0.5-15 GPa, such that the compressive modulus of the interbody fusion device generally corresponds to the compressive modulus of the surrounding cortical bone.


In one embodiment, locking features are provided to ensure that the modular interbody spacer is a unitary device both before and after insertion. To prevent the device from being separated prior to insertion, locking features may be provided on the rigid rails to prevent modular segments from being slid back off of the rails. This ensures that each modular segment is connected in its proper position and in the proper order. In addition, locking features may be provided on the modular segments to lock them together upon insertion. This prevents individual segments from dislocating from the assembled prosthesis and migrating outside of the annulus. Further, the interbody fusion device may include grooves, ridges, or other structures on its outer surface to contact surrounding bone and prevent the device from migrating out beyond the anterior limit of the intervertebral space.


Another aspect of the present invention comprises a method for implanting an interbody spacer. Because the modular interbody spacer may be implanted one segment at a time, a hole made in the annulus for implantation of the prosthesis may be a fraction of the size of the device in its final assembled form. The first modular segment is inserted into the intervertebral space through the small hole in the annulus. The second modular segment is then slid up the first rigid rail and into the intervertebral space until the second modular segment interlocks with the first modular segment. The tail stem of the first rigid rail is then severed from the device. This severing may be accomplished by simply snapping the rail off the device. Alternatively, the tail stem may be attached to the device by a screw, a bayonet mechanism, a twist lock or the like. As such, the rails may be removed from the device by unscrewing, or releasing the bayonet, etc. Subsequent modular segments are slid up the adjoining rigid rail into the interbody space and then interlocked with the previously inserted modular segment in a similar manner. Once all of the modular segments have been inserted and all of the tail stems severed, the modular interbody spacer is fully inserted into the patient's interbody space.


Another aspect of the present invention provides an insertion tool that may be used to aid in the insertion, positioning, and rail removal of the modular interbody spacer. The proximal end of the tool has a handle with an enclosed ratchet or roller mechanism attached to and in line with the inner lumen of an elongated tube at the distal end of the tool through which a rail may be inserted. The elongated tube may have a slit or other openings along the length of the tube to aid in threading the rails into the tube. The insertion tool may be provided with a cutting mechanism for removing the rails from the modular segments once they are fully inserted.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a top view of a modular interbody spacer according to an embodiment of the present invention in its inserted configuration.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a modular interbody spacer according to an embodiment of the present invention at a first stage of insertion.



FIG. 3 is a perspective a view of a modular interbody spacer according to an embodiment of the present invention at a second stage of insertion.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a modular interbody spacer according to an embodiment of the present invention at a final state of insertion.



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an alternate embodiment of the device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring to FIG. 1, there can be seen a top view of a modular interbody spacer 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention as configured once inserted into the body. In this embodiment, modular disc prosthesis 100 comprises first 102, second 104, third 106, and fourth 108 modular segments. Interbody spacer 100 may be comprised of any suitable biomaterial, for example, a polymer, such as PEEK, a metal, such as titanium, trabecular metal, bone, or a resorbable material that may act as a scaffold for new bone growth and/or a carrier for stem cells.


Modular segments 102, 104, 106 and 108 may be inserted via a small annulotomy from a posterior or lateral approach. Interbody spacer 100 may then be constructed within the interbody space by first inserting modular segment 102 into the interbody space, then sliding modular segments 104, 106 and 108 along a series of rails wherein each segment locks with the previous segment to create an interbody spacer 100 having a final, assembled surface area that fully contacts and supports the vertebral end plates.


Interbody spacer 100 may include locking barbs that prevent individual units from backing out or extending beyond the anterior limit of the spacer. Spacer 100 may further include grooves, ridges 142 or other structures to engage the surrounding bone or otherwise prevent spacer 100 from backing out of the intervertebral space.


In a preferred embodiment, interbody spacer 100 may be made of PEEK having holes therethrough, allowing for tissue ingrowth thus promoting bony fusion. The holes 140 may be of varying size and shape. Holes 140 may be spaced apart on spacer 100 in any manner such that the compressive modulus of spacer 100 generally corresponds to the compressive modulus of the adjacent bone. Spacer 100 may also be of varying thicknesses to achieve the desired support and/or fusion of a particular intervertebral space, such as a lordotic configuration for L5-S1 fusion.


In an embodiment, prior to insertion, holes 140 of interbody spacer 100 may be packed or filled for example with, autologous bone graft, calcified or decalcified bone derivative, bone graft substitute, such as hydroxyapatite, agents to promote bone growth, such as bone morphogenetic protein, or osteogenic protein-1, antibiotics, anti-cancer agents, stem cells, biologically active cytokines, cytokine inhibitors, fibroblast growth factors, other osteoinductive and/or osteoconductive materials or any other material and combination thereof to promote fusion and/or stabilize the spinal motion segment.


In another embodiment, interbody spacer 100 may include surface modifications to provide for elution of medicants. Such medicants may include analgesics, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anticoagulants, antineoplastics or bioosteologics such as bone growth agents. In an alternative embodiment, spacer 100 may be comprised of a material, such as for example, porous PEEK, from which an imbibed medicant can elute. In yet another embodiment, an inner portion of the spacer 100 may be comprised of one material, while the outer portion is comprised of another material. For example, the inner portion may be comprised of a solid PEEK, while the outer portion is comprised of a porous PEEK. The surface of the porous PEEK may be coated with a bioactive agent or medicant. Spacer 100 may be imbedded with a radiopaque material, such as tantalum or titanium beads to allow for x-ray visualization of the implant.


In another embodiment, the rails may be used as fill tubes such that fill material may be injected or otherwise inserted into holes 140. Spacer 100 may also be manufactured to include channels or ducts 160 into which fill material may be inserted via the rails.


Referring to FIG. 2, there can be seen a portion of a modular interbody spacer 100 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention prior to insertion into the intervertebral space. In alternate embodiments, the modular interbody spacer may comprise greater or fewer numbers of modular segments and rails.


Prior to insertion, modular interbody spacer 100 further includes first 110, second 112, and third 114 rails. First modular segment 102 is rigidly attached to first rail 110 at first segment interlocking portion 116. As shown in FIG. 3, second modular segment 104 is slidably attached to first segment interlocking portion 116 at first slot 128 and rigidly attached to second rail 112 at second segment interlocking portion 118. As shown in FIG. 4, third modular segment 106 is slidably attached to second interlocking portion 118 at second slot 130 and rigidly attached to third rail 114 at third segment interlocking portion 120. Fourth modular segment 108 is slidably attached to third rail 114 at fourth slot 133.


As shown in FIG. 2, each rail 110, 112 and 114 includes an elongated stem portion 170, 172, 174 that extends beyond a periphery of the body of the spacer 100, respectively. Preferably these stem portions 170, 172, 174 are long enough to permit access into the intervertebral space such that one modular segment can be positioned inside the intervertebral space while the next modular segment on the rail is still outside of the body. In an exemplary embodiment, the length of the stem portions 170, 172, 174 ranges between 6 cm-20 cm. Each rail 110, 112 and 114 may further include a retaining portion to keep the device from being separated prior to insertion. The retaining portions are configured to prevent the corresponding modular segments from sliding off the rails. The retaining portions may be molded into the rails or may be separate pieces or deformations of the rails added during the manufacture of the device. Rails 110, 112, 114 may be sequentially removed from the implant as modular segments 102, 104, 106, and 108 are connected within the intervertebral 5 space and moved laterally.


The preferred embodiment is an interbody spacer that is packaged, sterile, and ready for implantation at the surgical site. The package may include any number of modular segments. In a preferred embodiment, the package would include 5 individual modular segments. Single module packages may also be used so that the surgeon may use as many segments as desired. Since the device is fully preformed and delivered as a unitary implant, the device is under direct surgeon control until the interbody spacer is completely formed. This unitary design reduces the need for the surgeon to determine how to configure the spacer to allow for the most efficacious placement of the spacer in the intervertebral space and assures that the components' order of insertion and connection are properly achieved. The size and shape of the modular interbody spacer provides a final, assembled surface area that fully contacts and supports the vertebral end plates, stabilizing the spinal unit. In this regard, it will be understood that the modular interbody spacer 100 of the present invention may be provided in a variety of different final assembled sizes to correspond to different sizes of different intervertebral spaces.


In an alternative embodiment as shown in FIG. 5, separate guide rods 150, 151 and a guide mechanism 152 may be used to assist in inserting and aligning the modular segments. Rod 150, 151 may be attached to the proximal end of each modular segment. A first rod 150 may be used to insert a first modular segment 102 into position. A second guide rod 151 may be attached to a second modular segment 104 and used to place the second modular segment 104 in position to mate and interlock with the first modular segment 102. The first rod 150 could then be detached. Subsequent segments could be inserted by repeating the process.


In an embodiment, a modular segment may include a tapped hole 154 such that rod 150 may be screwed into hole 154. Rod 150 does not participate in the interlocking mechanism of modular segments. In an embodiment, rod 150 may either be made of the same material as the modular segments, or rod 150 may be comprised of a different material, including, but not limited to, plastics such as PEEK, or metals such as stainless steel or titanium. According to one aspect of the present invention, rod 150 may be integral to the modular segments. For example, rod 150 may be injection molded from a plastic or machined from a plastic or metal.


In another embodiment of the present invention, rod 150 may be formed separately from the modular segments and then joined to the modular segments via a mechanical method such as a mating thread, twist-lock, snap-lock or such, or by the use of adhesives or other material joining methods such as thermal and ultrasonic welding. One advantage to using a mechanical method of joining rod 150 to the modular segments is the potential to re-engage the modular segments for removal from the disc space, should the need arise. The removal sequence of rods 150 from the modular segments following implantation of the modular segments in the disc space is the same as for interlocking rails.


In an embodiment, modular interbody spacer 100 may be introduced through an access tube that is inserted partially into the intervertebral space. The access tube is at least 3 inches long and preferably about 6 inches long. It should be noted that although the insertion of modular intervertebral spacer 100 is described in relation to a four-segment embodiment, embodiments having any other number of segments would be inserted in a similar fashion.


During insertion, slots 128, 130, 133 slide along the stem portions 170, 172, 174 of rails 110, 112, 114 and onto segment interlocking portions 116, 118, 120. Slots 128, 130, 133 and segment interlocking portions 116, 118, 120 may be provided with locking features to prevent separation of modular segments 102, 104, 106 and 108. Locking features, such as a barb or stud or a series of barbs or studs, may be provided such that once a slot is slid onto a segment interlocking portion, it cannot be slid back off of it. A ratchet and pawl may also be used to lock modular segments together. A ratchet release tool may also be provided in case separation of modular 10 segments is desired once they are locked together.


Various modifications to the disclosed apparatuses and methods may be apparent to one of skill in the art upon reading this disclosure. The above is not contemplated to limit the scope of the present invention, which is limited only by the claims below.

Claims
  • 1. A modular interbody fusion device for fusing adjacent spinal vertebrae that is adapted to be implanted in a prepared interbody space, the device comprising: a first modular segment having a first width including a first rail, the first rail having an elongated stem portion and extending at least partially along one side of the first width of the first modular segment, the elongated stem portion having a length of 6 to 20 centimeters;a second modular segment having a second width and a body portion structure on one side of the second width slidably connectable to the stem portion of the first rail; andan insertion guide rod and guide mechanism for sliding the second modular segment along the stem portion of the first rail to mate and interlock with the first modular segment wherein the device has an implanted position in which the modular segments are positioned in a generally side by side configuration that defines a unitary body including multiple holes therethrough adapted for tissue ingrowth and adapted to contact and support adjacent vertebra,wherein one or more insertion guide rods, including the insertion guide rod, may be mechanically attached to and detached from one or more modular segments thus allowing assembly of the fusion device through an access tube that is inserted partially into the intervertebral space;and wherein the modular interbody fusion device is a unitary implant such that the first modular segment, the second module segment, the insertion guide rod, and the guide mechanism, are pre-assembled in an expanded position from which the second modular segment slides along the stem portion of the first rail to interlock with the first modular segment via the insertion guide rod and guide mechanism.
  • 2. The modular fusion device of claim 1 wherein each of the multiple holes couples to a channel in the unitary body to enable a fill material to be injected through each channel and into each one of the multiple holes.
  • 3. The modular fusion device of claim 2 wherein the fill material is selected from the group consisting of: bone graft, bone graft substitute, agents to promote bone growth, antibiotics, anti-cancer agents, stem cells, fibroblast growth factors, bone derivative, biologically active cytokines, cytokine inhibitors, osteoconductive material, osteoinductive material and any combination thereof.
  • 4. The modular fusion device of claim 1 wherein the one or more additional modular segments can be slidably connected sequentially to a previous modular segment wherein the device has an implanted position in which the first modular segment, the second modular segment and the one or more modular segments are positioned in a generally side by side configuration that defines a unitary body.
  • 5. The modular fusion device of claim 1, wherein the second modular segment includes a second rail extending at least partially along another side of the second width of the second modular segment.
  • 6. The modular fusion device of claim 1, wherein the multiple holes vary in size and shape.
  • 7. The modular fusion device of claim 1, wherein each of the multiple holes is elongated.
  • 8. The modular fusion device of claim 1, wherein each of the modular segments is manufactured from a material selected from the group consisting of titanium, trabecular metal, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), carbon-filled PEEK, or mixtures thereof.
  • 9. The modular fusion device of claim 1, wherein the multiple holes are spaced in a manner such that a compressive modulus of the unitary body corresponds to a compressive modulus of the adjacent spinal vertebrae.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/682,033, filed Aug. 21, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,195,048, issued Feb. 5, 2019, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/974,185, filed Oct. 11, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,737,414, issued Aug. 22, 2017; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/860,329 filed Nov. 21, 2006, each if which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

US Referenced Citations (278)
Number Name Date Kind
3030951 Mandarino Apr 1962 A
3728742 Averill et al. Apr 1973 A
3815599 Deyerle Jun 1974 A
3848601 Ma et al. Nov 1974 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
3867729 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
4081866 Upshaw et al. Apr 1978 A
4203444 Bonnell et al. May 1980 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4456745 Rajan Jun 1984 A
4463141 Robinson Jul 1984 A
4476293 Robinson Oct 1984 A
4477604 Oechsle, III Oct 1984 A
4502161 Wall Mar 1985 A
4647643 Zdrahala et al. Mar 1987 A
4651736 Sanders Mar 1987 A
4711639 Grundei Dec 1987 A
4722948 Sanderson Feb 1988 A
4743256 Brantigan May 1988 A
4743632 Marinovic May 1988 A
4772287 Ray et al. Sep 1988 A
4808691 Konig et al. Feb 1989 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4873308 Coury et al. Oct 1989 A
4880610 Constantz Nov 1989 A
4904260 Ray et al. Feb 1990 A
4911718 Lee et al. Mar 1990 A
4969888 Scholten et al. Nov 1990 A
5007940 Berg Apr 1991 A
5047055 Bao et al. Sep 1991 A
5067964 Richmond et al. Nov 1991 A
5082803 Sumita Jan 1992 A
5108404 Scholten et al. Apr 1992 A
5109077 Wick Apr 1992 A
5143942 Brown Sep 1992 A
5166115 Brown Nov 1992 A
5192326 Bao et al. Mar 1993 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5254662 Szycher et al. Oct 1993 A
5263987 Shah Nov 1993 A
5278201 Dunn et al. Jan 1994 A
5344458 Bonutti Sep 1994 A
5344459 Swartz Sep 1994 A
5397364 Kozak et al. Mar 1995 A
5458643 Oka et al. Oct 1995 A
5509934 Cohen Apr 1996 A
5514180 Heggeness May 1996 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5525418 Hashimoto et al. Jun 1996 A
5545229 Parsons et al. Aug 1996 A
5549683 Bonutti Aug 1996 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5556429 Felt Sep 1996 A
5562736 Ray et al. Oct 1996 A
5609635 Michelson Mar 1997 A
5624463 Stone et al. Apr 1997 A
5674294 Bainville et al. Oct 1997 A
5702453 Rabbe et al. Dec 1997 A
5702454 Baumgartner Dec 1997 A
5725531 Shapiro Mar 1998 A
5755797 Baumgartner May 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5776199 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5795353 Felt Aug 1998 A
5800547 Schafer et al. Sep 1998 A
5824093 Ray et al. Oct 1998 A
5860973 Michelson Jan 1999 A
5861041 Tienboon et al. Jan 1999 A
5888220 Felt et al. Mar 1999 A
5888227 Cottle Mar 1999 A
5888228 Knothe et al. Mar 1999 A
5893889 Harringson Apr 1999 A
5919236 Pfaff et al. Jul 1999 A
5944759 Link Aug 1999 A
5980522 Koros et al. Nov 1999 A
5989289 Coates et al. Nov 1999 A
5989291 Ralph et al. Nov 1999 A
6033438 Bianchi et al. Mar 2000 A
6048345 Berke et al. Apr 2000 A
6079868 Rydell Jun 2000 A
6080193 Hochshuler et al. Jun 2000 A
6096038 Michelson Aug 2000 A
6096080 Nicholson et al. Aug 2000 A
6102950 Vaccaro Aug 2000 A
6110210 Norton et al. Aug 2000 A
6113638 Williams et al. Sep 2000 A
6117174 Nolan Sep 2000 A
6132472 Bonutti Oct 2000 A
6139579 Steffee et al. Oct 2000 A
6140452 Felt et al. Oct 2000 A
6143033 Paul et al. Nov 2000 A
6146422 Lawson Nov 2000 A
6159211 Boriani et al. Dec 2000 A
6174311 Branch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176882 Bledermann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183517 Suddaby Feb 2001 B1
6190414 Young et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206923 Boyd et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206927 Fell et al. Mar 2001 B1
6224630 Bao et al. May 2001 B1
6224631 Kohrs May 2001 B1
6245108 Biscup Jun 2001 B1
6248131 Felt et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251140 Marino et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258125 Paul et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264695 Stoy Jul 2001 B1
6270528 McKay Aug 2001 B1
6302914 Michelson Oct 2001 B1
6342075 MacArthur Jan 2002 B1
6348071 Steffee et al. Feb 2002 B1
6371988 Pafford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371990 Ferree Apr 2002 B1
6387130 Stone et al. May 2002 B1
6419704 Ferree Jul 2002 B1
6419705 Erickson Jul 2002 B1
6436140 Liu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436143 Ross et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440169 Elberg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443988 Felt et al. Sep 2002 B2
6468311 Boyd et al. Oct 2002 B2
6488710 Besselink Dec 2002 B2
6511509 Ford et al. Jan 2003 B1
6524341 Lang et al. Feb 2003 B2
6533818 Weber et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537280 Dinger et al. Mar 2003 B2
6558421 Fell et al. May 2003 B1
6558424 Thalgott May 2003 B2
6562074 Gerbec et al. May 2003 B2
6595998 Johnson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6610092 Ralph et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610093 Pisharodi Aug 2003 B1
6620196 Trieu Sep 2003 B1
6648917 Gerbec et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652587 Felt et al. Nov 2003 B2
6669732 Serhan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6726720 Ross et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726721 Stoy et al. Apr 2004 B2
6733535 Michelson May 2004 B2
6740093 Hochschuler et al. May 2004 B2
6764514 Li et al. Jul 2004 B1
6770095 Grinberg et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773460 Jackson Aug 2004 B2
6793678 Hawkins Sep 2004 B2
6821298 Jackson Nov 2004 B1
6835206 Jackson Dec 2004 B2
6852129 Gerbec et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855165 Fell et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855167 Shimp et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866684 Fell et al. Mar 2005 B2
6893463 Fell et al. May 2005 B2
6896701 Boyd et al. May 2005 B2
6911044 Fell et al. Jun 2005 B2
6923831 Fell et al. Aug 2005 B2
6966928 Fell et al. Nov 2005 B2
7001431 Bao et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008452 Hawkins Mar 2006 B2
7018416 Hanson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7037339 Houfburg May 2006 B2
7238204 Le Couedic et al. Jul 2007 B2
7267690 Felt Sep 2007 B2
7291171 Ferree Nov 2007 B2
7297161 Fell Nov 2007 B2
7320709 Felt et al. Jan 2008 B2
7341602 Fell et al. Mar 2008 B2
7491235 Fell Feb 2009 B2
7491237 Randall et al. Feb 2009 B2
7563285 Ralph et al. Jul 2009 B2
7591853 Felt et al. Sep 2009 B2
7618458 Biedermann et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621960 Boyd et al. Nov 2009 B2
7666228 Le Couedic et al. Feb 2010 B2
7914582 Felt et al. Mar 2011 B2
8038718 Palm et al. Oct 2011 B2
8100977 Felt Jan 2012 B2
8828019 Raymond et al. Sep 2014 B1
9510953 Felt et al. Dec 2016 B2
9737414 Felt et al. Aug 2017 B2
20010004710 Felt et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010047207 Michelson Nov 2001 A1
20020026244 Trieu Feb 2002 A1
20020029084 Paul et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020055742 Lieberman May 2002 A1
20020099444 Boyd et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020127264 Felt et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020128713 Ferree Sep 2002 A1
20020183850 Felt et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030055506 Stoy et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065396 Michelson Apr 2003 A1
20030109928 Pasquet Jun 2003 A1
20030125739 Bagga et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130739 Gerbec et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135279 Michelson Jul 2003 A1
20030220691 Songer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030230198 Zitttel Dec 2003 A1
20030233147 Nicholson Dec 2003 A1
20030236571 Ralph et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002761 Rogers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006393 Burkinshaw Jan 2004 A1
20040010318 Ferree Jan 2004 A1
20040019354 Johnson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040049280 Cauthen Mar 2004 A1
20040054413 Higham et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059421 Glenn et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064144 Johnson et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040111155 Ferree Jun 2004 A1
20040127994 Kast et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162618 Mujwid et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172134 Berry Sep 2004 A1
20040186576 Biscup et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040220580 Johnson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220672 Shadduck Nov 2004 A1
20040225363 Richelsoph Nov 2004 A1
20040230198 Manzi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040267366 Kruger Dec 2004 A1
20040267367 O'Neil Dec 2004 A1
20050010290 Hawkins Jan 2005 A1
20050010295 Michelson Jan 2005 A1
20050015150 Lee Jan 2005 A1
20050033424 Fell Feb 2005 A1
20050055097 Grunberg et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050080489 Estes Apr 2005 A1
20050131543 Benzel et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154463 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050154465 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050187633 Ferree Aug 2005 A1
20050203599 Garabedian et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228500 Kim et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234555 Sutton et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240267 Randall et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050273178 Boyan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004454 Ferree et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025861 McKay Feb 2006 A1
20060058807 Landry et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058880 Wysocki et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069438 Zucherman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060106462 Tsou May 2006 A1
20060142858 Colleran et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142862 Diaz et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149383 Arnin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167550 Snell et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173542 Shikinami Aug 2006 A1
20060178745 Bartish et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189999 Zwirkoski Aug 2006 A1
20060190083 Arnin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195191 Sweeney et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060212118 Abernathie Sep 2006 A1
20060235535 Ferree et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247778 Ferree et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247781 Francis Nov 2006 A1
20060259144 Trieu Nov 2006 A1
20060264965 Shadduck et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293756 Felt Dec 2006 A1
20070027546 Palm Feb 2007 A1
20070032874 Lee et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050036 Felt Mar 2007 A1
20070233255 Song et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244485 Greenhalgh et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080039942 Bergeron Feb 2008 A1
20080065220 Alleyne et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080119853 Felt et al. May 2008 A1
20080125865 Abdelgany May 2008 A1
20080133017 Beyer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140206 Felt Jun 2008 A1
20080208343 Felt Aug 2008 A1
20080234820 Felt et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080249622 Gray Oct 2008 A1
20080262622 Butler Oct 2008 A1
20090069895 Gittings et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090138086 Dewey May 2009 A1
20090157186 Magerl Jun 2009 A1
20090270986 Christensen Oct 2009 A1
20090276047 Felt et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100030338 Simon Feb 2010 A1
20100057144 Felt et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100145457 Felt et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110270399 Yurek et al. Nov 2011 A1
20170181866 Felt et al. Jun 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
101193608 Jun 2008 CN
0 353 936 Feb 1990 EP
0 378 002 Jul 1990 EP
0 505 634 Sep 1992 EP
0 521 573 Jan 1993 EP
2781998 Feb 2000 FR
WO 9311723 Jun 1993 WO
WO 9530388 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9531946 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9531948 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9726847 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9820939 May 1998 WO
WO 9944509 Sep 1999 WO
WO 1999056800 Nov 1999 WO
WO 9961084 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0013619 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0059411 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0166021 Sep 2001 WO
WO 2002017821 Mar 2002 WO
WO 03099171 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004098466 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005051246 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2006051547 May 2006 WO
WO 2006127848 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006127849 Nov 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (77)
Entry
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,185, filed Oct. 11, 2007, inventors Felt et al.
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,998, filed May 15, 2013, inventors Felt et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/372,357, filed Mar. 9, 2006, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,205, filed Sep. 10, 2007, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,209, filed Sep. 9, 2007, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/372,477, filed Mar. 9, 2006, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,087, filed May 4, 2009, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,185, filed Oct. 11, 2007, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/098,601, filed Mar. 15, 2002, inventor Felt.
Transaction History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/121,455, filed Apr. 12, 2002, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/167,963, filed Jun. 12, 2002, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/722,019, filed Nov. 24, 2003, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,203, filed Dec. 10, 2007, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/489,264, filed Jul. 19, 2006, inventor Palm.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,402, filed Jun. 5, 2009, inventor Felt.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/328,498, filed Jan. 9, 2006, inventor Sweeney et al.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,225, filed Aug. 26, 2009, inventors Felt et al.
Details of Second Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2012 for Chinese Application No. 200680018453.0.
Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2012 for Chinese Application No. 200780050196.3 English Translation not available.
Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2013 for Chinese Application No. 200780050196.3. English Translation not available.
Office Action dated Jun. 4,2010for Chinese Application No. 200680034261.9.
Search Report dated Mar. 21, 2012 for European Application No. EP06771111.
Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013 for European Application No. 06771111.9.
Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2012 for European Application No. EP07853144.
Office Action dated Jul. 30,2013for Japanese Application No. 2009-538404.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese Application No. 2009-538404.
Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2011 for Japanese Application No. 2008-513686.
Notification of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 29, 2012 for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/20152.
Search Report dated Jul. 18, 2006 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/000558.
Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 4, 2009 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/024262.
Search Report dated Sep. 12, 2008 for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/20152.
IPRP and Written Opinion dated Sep. 25, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/032786.
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 19, 2013 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/032786.
An et al., “The Future of Spinal Fuzion. Txt.” ORTHO SuperSite, Aug. 2006 pp. 1-3.
Andersson et al., “Macintosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Rheumatology, The London Hospital, London, England, 1974, pp. 245-259.
Cameron et al., “Review of a Failed Knee Replacement and Some Observations on the Design of a Knee Resurfacing Prosthesis,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, vol. 97, No. 1, 1980, pp. 87-89.
Clary et al., “Experience with the MacIntosh Knee Prosthesis,” Southern Medical Journal, Journal of the Southern Medical Association, Mar. 1972, vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 265-272.
Cluett, “Discetomy-Spinal Surgery to remove herniated disc”, Nov. 29, 2005. 3 pages. http://orthopedica.about.com/cs/herniateddisk/a/repturedisk_3.htm.
Conaty, “Surgery of the Hip and Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” The Arthritis Servie (surgery) of Rancho, Los Amigos Hospital, Downey, Mar. 1973, vol. 55-A, No. 2, pp. 301-314.
Emerson et al., “The Use of the McKeever metallic Hemiarthroplasty for Unicompartmental Arthritis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1985, pp. 208-212.
Hackenberg et al., “Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results,” Eur Spine J, 2005, pp. 551-558.
Hastings, “Double Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Feb. 1973, vol. 55 B, No. 1, pp. 112-118.
Jessop et al., “Follow-up of the Macintosh Arthroplasty of the Knee Joint,” Rheum. Phys. Med., 1972, vol. XI, No. 5, pp. 224.
Kay et al., “The Macintosh Tibial Plateau Hemiprosthesis for the Rheumatoid Knee,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, May 1972, vol. 54B, No. 2, pp. 256-262.
Kowalski et al., “Biomechanics of bone fusion,” Neurosurg. Focus, Apr. 2001, vol. 10, pp. 1-7.
Kozinn et al., “Surgical Treatment of Unicompartmental Degenerative Arthritis of the Knee,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, Dec. 1988, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 545-564.
MacIntosh et al., “The Use of the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis for Advanced Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Knee,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, May 1972, vol. 54 B, No. 2, pp. 244-255.
McCallum et al., “Duplication of Medial Erosion in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1995, pp. 726-728.
McCollum et al., “Tibial Plateau Prosthesis in Arthroplasty of the Knee,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Jun. 1970, vol. 52-A., No. 4, pp. 827-828.
McKeever, “Tibial Plateau Prosthesis,” The Classic, pp. 3-12. Jan.-Feb. 1985.
Norton, “I:300 Interbody Fusion Device Technology Analysis,” ABS Advanced Biosurfaces, Inc., Mar. 26, 2007, pp. 1-18.
Porter, “MacIntosh Athroplasty: a long-term review,” J.R. Coll. Surg. Edinb., Aug. 1988, vol. 33, pp. 199-201.
Potter, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Jan. 1972, vol. 54-A, No. 1, pp. 1-24.
Potter, “Arthroplasty of the Knee with Tibial Metallic Implants of the McKeever and MacIntosh Design,” Surgical Clinics of North America, Aug. 1969, vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 903-915.
Powers et al., “Minimally Invasive Fusion and Fixation Techniques,” Neurosurg. Clin N Am, 2006, pp. 477-489.
RSB Spine, LLC, “510(k) Summary,” Sep. 18, 2007, 4 pages, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ryortho, “Here comes ProDisc” Orthopedics This Week, vol. 2, Issue 3. (published prior to Jan. 19, 2006).
Sbarbaro, “Hemitibial plateau prosthesis ten years experience in 500 knee arthroplasties,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 1973, pp. 91-100.
Schorn et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, vol. XVII, No. 3, pp. 155-163. 1978.
Scott et al., “McKeever Metallic Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Unicompartmental Degenerative Arthritis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Feb. 1985, vol. 67-A, No. 2, pp. 203-207.
Spine-Tech, Inc., “Summary of Safety and Effectiveness,” May 23, 2996, 100 pages, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Wayne, “Use of the McIntosh Prosthesis in Surgical Reconstruction of the Knee,” Abstracts of the 1971 Proceedings, Jun. 1972, No. 85, pp. 292-293.
Shin et al., “Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion via a Unilateral Approach,” Yonsei Medical Journal, 2006, vol. 47, pp. 319-325.
Stauffer et al., “The MacIntosh Prosthesis, Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation,” Arch Surg, Jun. 1975, vol. 110, pp. 717-720.
Steffen et al., “Effect of Implant Design and Endplate Preparation on the Compressive Strength of Interbody Fusion Constructs,” SPINE, 2000, vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 1077-1084.
Swanson et al., “Unicompartmental and Bicompartmental Arthroplasty of the Knee with a Finned Metal Tibial-Plateau Implant,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Oct. 1985, vol. 67-A, No. 8, pp. 1175-1182.
Synthes Spine, “510 (k) Summary—Revised Sep. 2007” 5 pages, Sep. 14, 2007West Chester, Pennsylvania.
Tan et al., Interbody Device Shape and Size are Important to Strengthen the Vertebra—Implant Interface, SPINE 2005. vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 638-644.
Taylor et al., “MacIntosh arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis,” Proceedings and Reports of Universities, Colleges, Councils and Associations, pp. 119-120.
Toth et al., “Polyehteretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications,” Biomaterials, 2006, pp. 324-334.
Vadapalli et al., “Biomechanical Rationale for Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Finite Element Study,” SPINE, 2006, vol. 31, No. 26, pp. E992-E998.
Vertebral Technologies, “InterFuse® Interbody Fusion System,” 2009, pamphlet.
Wordsworth et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty for the rheumatoid knee: a 10-year follow up,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1985, pp. 738-741.
Zwillich, Artificial Spinal Disc Nears Approval. WebMD Medical News. Nov. 29, 2005. 4 pages, http://www.webmd.com/content/article/88/9801.htm.
Get ADR.com Top Surgeons—Latest Orthopedic Options, Nov. 29, 2005, 2 pages, http://www.getadr.com/link.htm.
Get ADR.com Top Surgeons—Latest Orthopedic Options, Nov. 29, 2005, 2 pages, http://www.getadr.com/maverick.htm.
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,295, filed Nov. 29, 2016, inventors Felt et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190269524 A1 Sep 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60860329 Nov 2006 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15682033 Aug 2017 US
Child 16266788 US
Parent 11974185 Oct 2007 US
Child 15682033 US